1
|
Fleischmann DF, Gajdi L, Corradini S, Schönecker S, Marschner S, Bodensohn R, Hofmaier J, Garny S, Forbrig R, Thon N, Belka C, Niyazi M. Re-irradiation treatment regimens for patients with recurrent glioma - Evaluation of the optimal dose and best concurrent therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024:110437. [PMID: 39013502 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Re-irradiation (reRT) is an effective treatment modality for patients with recurrent glioma. Data on dose escalation, the use of simulated integrated boost and concomitant therapy to reRT are still scarce. In this monocentric cohort of n = 223 patients we investigated the influence of reRT dose escalation as well as the concomitant use of bevacizumab (BEV) with regard to post-recurrence survival (PRS) and risk of radionecrosis (RN). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with recurrent glioma treated between July 2008 and August 2022 with reRT with BEV, reRT with temozolomide (TMZ) and reRT without concomitant systemic therapy were retrospectively analyzed. PRS and RN-free survival (RNFS) were calculated for all patients using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Univariable and multivariable cox regression was performed for PRS and for RNFS. The reRT Risk Score (RRRS) was calculated for all patients. RESULTS Good, intermediate and poor risk of the RRRS translated into 11 months, 9 months and 7 months of median PRS (univariable: p = 0.008, multivariable: p = 0.013). ReRT was applied with a dose of ≤36 Gy (n = 140) or >36 Gy (n = 83). Concomitant bevacizumab (BEV) therapy was performed in n = 122 and concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) therapy in n = 32 patients. Median PRS was 10 months in patients treated with >36 Gy and 8 months in patients treated with ≤36 Gy (univariable: p = 0.032, multivariable: p = 0.576). Regarding concomitant TMZ therapy, median PRS was 14 months vs. 9 months for patients treated with or without TMZ (univariable: p = 0.041, multivariable: p = 0.019). No statistically significant influence on PRS was seen for concomitant BEV therapy in this series. RN was less frequent for reRT with concomitant BEV, (17/122; 13.9 %) than for reRT without BEV (30/101; 29.7 %). Regarding RNFS, the hazard ratio for reRT with BEV was 0.436 (univariable; p = 0.006) and 0.479 (multivariable; p = 0.023), respectively. ReRT dose did not show statistical significance in regards to RN (univariable: p = 0.073, multivariable: p = 0.404). RNFS was longer for patients receiving concomitant BEV to reRT than for patients treated with reRT only (mean 31.7 vs. 30.9 months, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION In this cohort, in patients treated with concomitant BEV therapy RN was less frequently detected and in patients treated with concomitant TMZ longer PRS was observed. Based on these results, the best concomitant therapy and the optimal dose should be decided on a patient-by-patient basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Laura Gajdi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Forbrig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Galldiks N, Kaufmann TJ, Vollmuth P, Lohmann P, Smits M, Veronesi MC, Langen KJ, Rudà R, Albert NL, Hattingen E, Law I, Hutterer M, Soffietti R, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1181-1194. [PMID: 38466087 PMCID: PMC11226881 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain tumor diagnostics have significantly evolved with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In addition to anatomical MRI, these modalities may provide valuable information for several clinical applications such as differential diagnosis, delineation of tumor extent, prognostication, differentiation between tumor relapse and treatment-related changes, and the evaluation of response to anticancer therapy. In particular, joint recommendations of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Group, the European Association of Neuro-oncology, and major European and American Nuclear Medicine societies highlighted that the additional clinical value of radiolabeled amino acids compared to anatomical MRI alone is outstanding and that its widespread clinical use should be supported. For advanced MRI and its steadily increasing use in clinical practice, the Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition provided more recently an updated acquisition protocol for the widely used dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. Besides amino acid PET and perfusion MRI, other PET tracers and advanced MRI techniques (e.g. MR spectroscopy) are of considerable clinical interest and are increasingly integrated into everyday clinical practice. Nevertheless, these modalities have shortcomings which should be considered in clinical routine. This comprehensive review provides an overview of potential challenges, limitations, and pitfalls associated with PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques in patients with gliomas or brain metastases. Despite these issues, PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques continue to play an indispensable role in brain tumor management. Acknowledging and mitigating these challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, standardized protocols, and continuous innovation will further enhance the utility of these modalities in guiding optimal patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
| | | | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Brain Tumour Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael C Veronesi
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Goethe University, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Markus Hutterer
- Department of Neurology with Acute Geriatrics, Saint John of God Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Timmeren JE, Bussink J, Koopmans P, Smeenk RJ, Monshouwer R. Longitudinal Image Data for Outcome Modeling. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024:S0936-6555(24)00277-2. [PMID: 39003124 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
In oncology, medical imaging is crucial for diagnosis, treatment planning and therapy execution. Treatment responses can be complex and varied and are known to involve factors of treatment, patient characteristics and tumor microenvironment. Longitudinal image analysis is able to track temporal changes, aiding in disease monitoring, treatment evaluation, and outcome prediction. This allows for the enhancement of personalized medicine. However, analyzing longitudinal 2D and 3D images presents unique challenges, including image registration, reliable segmentation, dealing with variable imaging intervals, and sparse data. This review presents an overview of techniques and methodologies in longitudinal image analysis, with a primary focus on outcome modeling in radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E van Timmeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - J Bussink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - P Koopmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - R Monshouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Low JC, Cao J, Hesse F, Wright AJ, Tsyben A, Alshamleh I, Mair R, Brindle KM. Deuterium Metabolic Imaging Differentiates Glioblastoma Metabolic Subtypes and Detects Early Response to Chemoradiotherapy. Cancer Res 2024; 84:1996-2008. [PMID: 38635885 PMCID: PMC11176915 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-2552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Metabolic subtypes of glioblastoma (GBM) have different prognoses and responses to treatment. Deuterium metabolic imaging with 2H-labeled substrates is a potential approach to stratify patients into metabolic subtypes for targeted treatment. In this study, we used 2H magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) measurements of [6,6'-2H2]glucose metabolism to identify metabolic subtypes and their responses to chemoradiotherapy in patient-derived GBM xenografts in vivo. The metabolism of patient-derived cells was first characterized in vitro by measuring the oxygen consumption rate, a marker of mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle activity, as well as the extracellular acidification rate and 2H-labeled lactate production from [6,6'-2H2]glucose, which are markers of glycolytic activity. Two cell lines representative of a glycolytic subtype and two representative of a mitochondrial subtype were identified. 2H magnetic resonance spectroscopy and MRSI measurements showed similar concentrations of 2H-labeled glucose from [6,6'-2H2]glucose in all four tumor models when implanted orthotopically in mice. The glycolytic subtypes showed higher concentrations of 2H-labeled lactate than the mitochondrial subtypes and normal-appearing brain tissue, whereas the mitochondrial subtypes showed more glutamate/glutamine labeling, a surrogate for tricarboxylic acid cycle activity, than the glycolytic subtypes and normal-appearing brain tissue. The response of the tumors to chemoradiation could be detected within 24 hours of treatment completion, with the mitochondrial subtypes showing a decrease in both 2H-labeled glutamate/glutamine and lactate concentrations and glycolytic tumors showing a decrease in 2H-labeled lactate concentration. This technique has the potential to be used clinically for treatment selection and early detection of treatment response. SIGNIFICANCE Deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of glucose metabolism has the potential to differentiate between glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolic subtypes in glioblastoma and to evaluate early treatment responses, which could guide patient treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C.M. Low
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jianbo Cao
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Friederike Hesse
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alan J. Wright
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasia Tsyben
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Islam Alshamleh
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Mair
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin M. Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ene CI, Abi Faraj C, Beckham TH, Weinberg JS, Andersen CR, Haider AS, Rao G, Ferguson SD, Alvarez-Brenkenridge CA, Kim BYS, Heimberger AB, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Wang CM, Ghia AJ, McGovern SL, Chung C, McAleer MF, Tom MC, Perni S, Swanson TA, Yeboa DN, Briere TM, Huse JT, Fuller GN, Lang FF, Li J, Suki D, Sawaya RE. Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3728. [PMID: 38697991 PMCID: PMC11066027 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47998-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
With improvements in survival for patients with metastatic cancer, long-term local control of brain metastases has become an increasingly important clinical priority. While consensus guidelines recommend surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lesions >3 cm, smaller lesions (≤3 cm) treated with SRS alone elicit variable responses. To determine factors influencing this variable response to SRS, we analyzed outcomes of brain metastases ≤3 cm diameter in patients with no prior systemic therapy treated with frame-based single-fraction SRS. Following SRS, 259 out of 1733 (15%) treated lesions demonstrated MRI findings concerning for local treatment failure (LTF), of which 202 /1733 (12%) demonstrated LTF and 54/1733 (3%) had an adverse radiation effect. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size (>1.5 cm) and melanoma histology were associated with higher LTF rates. Our results demonstrate that brain metastases ≤3 cm are not uniformly responsive to SRS and suggest that prospective studies to evaluate the effect of SRS alone or in combination with surgery on brain metastases ≤3 cm matched by tumor size and histology are warranted. These studies will help establish multi-disciplinary treatment guidelines that improve local control while minimizing radiation necrosis during treatment of brain metastasis ≤3 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Christina Abi Faraj
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas H Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clark R Andersen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ali S Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Betty Y S Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chenyang Michael Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Subha Perni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina M Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory N Fuller
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dima Suki
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raymond E Sawaya
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Affairs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Piffer S, Greto D, Ubaldi L, Mortilla M, Ciccarone A, Desideri I, Genitori L, Livi L, Marrazzo L, Pallotta S, Retico A, Sardi I, Talamonti C. Radiomic- and dosiomic-based clustering development for radio-induced neurotoxicity in pediatric medulloblastoma. Childs Nerv Syst 2024:10.1007/s00381-024-06416-6. [PMID: 38642113 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06416-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Texture analysis extracts many quantitative image features, offering a valuable, cost-effective, and non-invasive approach for individual medicine. Furthermore, multimodal machine learning could have a large impact for precision medicine, as texture biomarkers can underlie tissue microstructure. This study aims to investigate imaging-based biomarkers of radio-induced neurotoxicity in pediatric patients with metastatic medulloblastoma, using radiomic and dosiomic analysis. METHODS This single-center study retrospectively enrolled children diagnosed with metastatic medulloblastoma (MB) and treated with hyperfractionated craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Histological confirmation of medulloblastoma and baseline follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were mandatory. Treatment involved helical tomotherapy (HT) delivering a dose of 39 Gray (Gy) to brain and spinal axis and a posterior fossa boost up to 60 Gy. Clinical outcomes, such as local and distant brain control and neurotoxicity, were recorded. Radiomic and dosiomic features were extracted from tumor regions on T1, T2, FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) MRI-maps, and radiotherapy dose distribution. Different machine learning feature selection and reduction approaches were performed for supervised and unsupervised clustering. RESULTS Forty-eight metastatic medulloblastoma patients (29 males and 19 females) with a mean age of 12 ± 6 years were enrolled. For each patient, 332 features were extracted. Greater level of abstraction of input data by combining selection of most performing features and dimensionality reduction returns the best performance. The resulting one-component radiomic signature yielded an accuracy of 0.73 with sensitivity, specificity, and precision of 0.83, 0.64, and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning radiomic-dosiomic approach effectively stratified pediatric medulloblastoma patients who experienced radio-induced neurotoxicity. Strategy needs further validation in external dataset for its potential clinical use in ab initio management paradigms of medulloblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Piffer
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence Division, Florence, Italy.
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Leonardo Ubaldi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence Division, Florence, Italy
| | - Marzia Mortilla
- Radiology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Ciccarone
- Medical Physics Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Genitori
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Livia Marrazzo
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence Division, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence Division, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Iacopo Sardi
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Cinzia Talamonti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence Division, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li K, Zhu Q, Yang J, Zheng Y, Du S, Song M, Peng Q, Yang R, Liu Y, Qi L. Imaging and Liquid Biopsy for Distinguishing True Progression From Pseudoprogression in Gliomas, Current Advances and Challenges. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00162-4. [PMID: 38614827 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Gliomas are aggressive brain tumors with a poor prognosis. Assessing treatment response is challenging because magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not distinguish true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP). This review aims to discuss imaging techniques and liquid biopsies used to distinguish TP from PsP. MATERIALS AND METHODS This review synthesizes existing literature to examine advances in imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance diffusion imaging (MRDI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) MRI, and liquid biopsies, for identifying TP or PsP through tumor markers and tissue characteristics. RESULTS Advanced imaging techniques, including MRDI and PWI MRI, have proven effective in delineating tumor tissue properties, offering valuable insights into glioma behavior. Similarly, liquid biopsy has emerged as a potent tool for identifying tumor-derived markers in biofluids, offering a non-invasive glimpse into tumor evolution. Despite their promise, these methodologies grapple with significant challenges. Their sensitivity remains inconsistent, complicating the accurate differentiation between TP and PSP. Furthermore, the absence of standardized protocols across platforms impedes the reliability of comparisons, while inherent biological variability adds complexity to data interpretation. CONCLUSION Their potential applications have been highlighted, but gaps remain before routine clinical use. Further research is needed to develop and validate these promising methods for distinguishing TP from PsP in gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaishu Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China; Department of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), 1# Jiazi Road, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China.; Department of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Qihui Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Junyi Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Yin Zheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Siyuan Du
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Meihui Song
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Qian Peng
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China
| | - Runwei Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), 1# Jiazi Road, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China
| | - Yawei Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), 1# Jiazi Road, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China
| | - Ling Qi
- Institute of Digestive Disease of Guangzhou Medical University, Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University,Qingyuan People's Hospital, Qingyuan 511518, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barrios-González DA, Gonzalez-Salido J, Colado-Martínez J, Philibert-Rosas S, Sotelo-Díaz F, Sebastián-Díaz MA, Gómez-Rodríguez LJ, Kerik-Rotenberg NE, Gutiérrez-Aceves GA, Martínez-Juárez IE. Unmasking the Mimic: Radionecrotic Lesion Masquerading as Brain Neoplasia on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cureus 2024; 16:e59259. [PMID: 38813315 PMCID: PMC11134471 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Corpus callosotomy is a therapeutic approach for drug-resistant epilepsy, with positive outcomes observed in managing atonic seizures. Despite a decline in its usage, radiosurgical callosotomy remains a viable option for drug-resistant epilepsy due to its low risks of post-radiation neoplasia, albeit not with exceptions. Brain radionecrosis is characterized by tissue death and vascular endothelial damage following the procedure. Despite the low risk of intracranial secondary malignancy associated with radiation in some cases, post-radiation lesions might present with distinct characteristics needing a thorough diagnostic approach. Herein, we present a unique case of a patient with focal epilepsy who developed a radionecrotic lesion following radiosurgical callosotomy, affecting the anterior cingulate cortex, and mimicking a central nervous system (CNS) tumor. Molecular imaging techniques, including 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18-FDG PET/CT) and 11C-acetate PET/CT scans, were employed to differentiate the lesion from a tumor. This case underscores the importance of considering radionecrosis as a differential diagnosis in patients who undergo radiosurgical callosotomy presenting with ring-like enhancement lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jimena Gonzalez-Salido
- Epilepsy Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico, Mexico City, MEX
| | | | | | - Fernando Sotelo-Díaz
- Neurosurgery Residency Program, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico, MEX
| | | | | | - Nora E Kerik-Rotenberg
- Molecular imaging unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City , MEX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu EL, Patel A, McGunigal MC, Johng SY, Mortazavi A, Jay AK, Ahn PH, Anaizi AN, DeKlotz TR. Characterization of cerebral radiation necrosis following the treatment of sinonasal malignancies. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2024; 9:e1200. [PMID: 38525116 PMCID: PMC10960240 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Our study aims to determine the incidence and potential risk factors for cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) following treatment of sinonasal malignancies. Methods One hundred thirty-two patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignancies over an 18-year period were identified at two institutions. Forty-six patients meeting inclusion criteria and treated with radiation therapy were included for analysis. Demographic and clinical-pathologic characteristics were collected and reviewed. Post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at least 1 year following treatment was reviewed to determine presence or absence of CRN. Results CRN was identified on MRI in 8 of 46 patients (17.4%) following radiation treatment. Patients with a history of reirradiation were more likely to develop CRN (50% vs. 10.5%, p < .05). The BEDs of radiation were also higher in CRN patients compared to non-CRN patients, but this difference was not significant (p > .05). CRN patients had a higher proportion of tumors with skull base involvement than non-CRN patients (100% vs. 57.9%, p = .037). Demographics, comorbidities, pathology, primary tumor subsite, chemotherapy use, and stage of disease demonstrated no significant increase in risk of CRN. Conclusions Reirradiation and tumor skull base involvement were significant risk factors associated with CRN. Higher average total prescribed and BEDs of radiation were seen in the CRN groups, but these differences were not statistically significant. Gender, comorbidities, tumor subsite, tumor location, and treatment type were not significantly different between groups. Level of evidence Level 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L. Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Atur Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Mary C. McGunigal
- Veteran Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare SystemState University of New York – Downstate Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | | | - Ann K. Jay
- Department of RadiologyMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Peter H. Ahn
- Department of Radiation OncologyMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Amjad N. Anaizi
- Department of NeurosurgeryMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Timothy R. DeKlotz
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashingtonDCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schüre JR, Casagranda S, Sedykh M, Liebig P, Papageorgakis C, Mancini L, Bisdas S, Nichelli L, Pinter N, Mechtler L, Jafari R, Boddaert N, Dangouloff-Ros V, Poujol J, Schmidt M, Doerfler A, Zaiss M. Fluid suppression in amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) CEST imaging: New theoretical insights and clinical benefits. Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:1354-1367. [PMID: 38073061 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI at 3T provides a unique contrast for brain tumor imaging. However, APTw imaging suffers from hyperintensities in liquid compartments such as cystic or necrotic structures and provides a distorted APTw signal intensity. Recently, it has been shown that heuristically motivated fluid suppression can remove such artifacts and significantly improve the readability of APTw imaging. THEORY AND METHODS In this work, we show that the fluid suppression can actually be understood by the known concept of spillover dilution, which itself can be derived from the Bloch-McConnell equations in comparison to the heuristic approach. Therefore, we derive a novel post-processing formula that efficiently removes fluid artifact, and explains previous approaches. We demonstrate the utility of this APTw assessment in silico, in vitro, and in vivo in brain tumor patients acquired at MR scanners from different vendors. RESULTS Our results show a reduction of the CEST signals from fluid environments while keeping the APTw-CEST signal intensity almost unchanged for semi-solid tissue structures such as the contralateral normal appearing white matter. This further allows us to use the same color bar settings as for conventional APTw imaging. CONCLUSION Fluid suppression has considerable value in improving the readability of APTw maps in the neuro-oncological field. In this work, we derive a novel post-processing formula from the underlying Bloch-McConnell equations that efficiently removes fluid artifact, and explains previous approaches which justify the derivation of this metric from a theoretical point of view, to reassure the scientific and medical field about its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Rüdiger Schüre
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefano Casagranda
- Department of R&D Advanced Applications, Olea Medical, La Ciotat, France
| | - Maria Sedykh
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Laura Mancini
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trus, London, UK
- Institute of Neurology UCL, London, UK
| | - Sotirios Bisdas
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College of London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trus, London, UK
- Institute of Neurology UCL, London, UK
| | - Lucia Nichelli
- Department of Neuroradiology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - Nandor Pinter
- DENT Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
- Department of Radiology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | | - Ramin Jafari
- Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nathalie Boddaert
- Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, AP-HP, Pediatric Radiology Department, Université Paris, Paris, France
- Imagine Institute, INSERM U1163, Université Paris cité, Paris, France
| | - Volodia Dangouloff-Ros
- Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, AP-HP, Pediatric Radiology Department, Université Paris, Paris, France
- Imagine Institute, INSERM U1163, Université Paris cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Manuel Schmidt
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arnd Doerfler
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Moritz Zaiss
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ngu S, Werner C, D' Amico RS, Wernicke AG. Whole brain radiation therapy resulting in radionecrosis: a possible link with radiosensitising chemoimmunotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256758. [PMID: 38016763 PMCID: PMC10685978 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionecrosis describes a rare but serious complication of radiation therapy. In clinical practice, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used in combination with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy, either concurrently or sequentially. There is a paucity of literature regarding radionecrosis in patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone (without additional SRS) in combination with immunotherapy or targeted therapies. It is observed that certain combinations increase the overall radiosensitivity of the tumorous lesions. We present a rare case of symptomatic radionecrosis almost 1 year after WBRT in a patient with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer on third-line chemoimmunotherapy. We discuss available research regarding factors that may lead to radionecrosis in these patients, including molecular and genetic profiles, specific drug therapy combinations and their timing or increased overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Ngu
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Cassidy Werner
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Randy S D' Amico
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Herrán de la Gala D, Casagranda S, Mathon B, Mandonnet E, Nichelli L. High perilesional T2-FLAIR signal around anterior temporal perivascular spaces: How can fluid suppressed Amide Proton Transfer weighted imaging further comfort the diagnosis. Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 103:119-123. [PMID: 37481093 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Areas of marked T2-FLAIR hyperintensity around perivascular spaces can be misdiagnosed as tumor, especially in case of lesion evolution. In this report, we show and describe increased T2-FLAIR signal intensity around anterior temporal perivascular spaces in three patients and shortly review this poorly known entity. In addition, we discuss for the first time the added value of fluid suppressed APTw imaging, an emerging noninvasive molecular technique, in the characterization of this "do not touch" abnormality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefano Casagranda
- Department of Research & Development Advanced Applications, Olea Medical, Avenue des Sorbiers, La Ciotat, France
| | - Bertrand Mathon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Mandonnet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Lucia Nichelli
- Department of Radiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martucci M, Russo R, Giordano C, Schiarelli C, D’Apolito G, Tuzza L, Lisi F, Ferrara G, Schimperna F, Vassalli S, Calandrelli R, Gaudino S. Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Treated Glioblastoma: A Pictorial Essay. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3790. [PMID: 37568606 PMCID: PMC10417432 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
MRI plays a key role in the evaluation of post-treatment changes, both in the immediate post-operative period and during follow-up. There are many different treatment's lines and many different neuroradiological findings according to the treatment chosen and the clinical timepoint at which MRI is performed. Structural MRI is often insufficient to correctly interpret and define treatment-related changes. For that, advanced MRI modalities, including perfusion and permeability imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, are increasingly utilized in clinical practice to characterize treatment effects more comprehensively. This article aims to provide an overview of the role of advanced MRI modalities in the evaluation of treated glioblastomas. For a didactic purpose, we choose to divide the treatment history in three main timepoints: post-surgery, during Stupp (first-line treatment) and at recurrence (second-line treatment). For each, a brief introduction, a temporal subdivision (when useful) or a specific drug-related paragraph were provided. Finally, the current trends and application of radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) in the evaluation of treated GB have been outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matia Martucci
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Rosellina Russo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Carolina Giordano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Chiara Schiarelli
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Gabriella D’Apolito
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Laura Tuzza
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.T.); (F.L.); (G.F.); (F.S.); (S.V.)
| | - Francesca Lisi
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.T.); (F.L.); (G.F.); (F.S.); (S.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Ferrara
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.T.); (F.L.); (G.F.); (F.S.); (S.V.)
| | - Francesco Schimperna
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.T.); (F.L.); (G.F.); (F.S.); (S.V.)
| | - Stefania Vassalli
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.T.); (F.L.); (G.F.); (F.S.); (S.V.)
| | - Rosalinda Calandrelli
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
| | - Simona Gaudino
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (R.R.); (C.G.); (C.S.); (G.D.); (R.C.); (S.G.)
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.T.); (F.L.); (G.F.); (F.S.); (S.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bompaire F, Birzu C, Bihan K, Desestret V, Fargeot G, Farina A, Joubert B, Leclercq D, Nichelli L, Picca A, Tafani C, Weiss N, Psimaras D, Ricard D. Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:405-416. [PMID: 37059646 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T cells) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI-related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavie Bompaire
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Service de Santé des Armées, Clamart, France; UMR 9010 Centre Borelli, Université Paris-Saclay, École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Service de Santé des Armées, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Saclay, France; OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France
| | - Cristina Birzu
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Bihan
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; AP-HP, Service de Pharmacologie, Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Inserm, CIC-1901, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - Virginie Desestret
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; Service de Neurocognition et Neuro-ophtalmologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre-Wertheimer, Lyon, France; Centre de Référence Maladies Rares pour les Syndromes Neurologiques Paranéoplasiques et les Encéphalites Auto-Immunes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron, France; MeLiS, UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, Inserm U1314, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Fargeot
- AP-HP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Antonio Farina
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares pour les Syndromes Neurologiques Paranéoplasiques et les Encéphalites Auto-Immunes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron, France; MeLiS, UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, Inserm U1314, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Service de Neurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Bastien Joubert
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; Centre de Référence Maladies Rares pour les Syndromes Neurologiques Paranéoplasiques et les Encéphalites Auto-Immunes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron, France; MeLiS, UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, Inserm U1314, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Service de Neurologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Delphine Leclercq
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; AP-HP, Service de Neuroradiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - Lucia Nichelli
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; AP-HP, Service de Neuroradiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Picca
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Camille Tafani
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Service de Santé des Armées, Clamart, France; OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Weiss
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Psicologia, Area del Farmaco e Salute del Bambino. Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy; AP-HP, Service de Soins Intensifs en Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France; École du Val-de-Grâce, Service de Santé des Armées, Paris, France
| | - Dimitri Psimaras
- OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Damien Ricard
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Service de Santé des Armées, Clamart, France; UMR 9010 Centre Borelli, Université Paris-Saclay, École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Service de Santé des Armées, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Saclay, France; OncoNeuroTox Group: Center for Patients with Neurological Complications of Oncologic Treatments, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles-Foix et Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Paris, France; École du Val-de-Grâce, Service de Santé des Armées, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grand S, Nedunchelian M, Charara S, Demaison R, Jean C, Galloux A, Kastler A, Attye A, Berthet C, Krainik A. Tumor or not a tumor: Pitfalls and differential diagnosis in neuro-oncology. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:378-393. [PMID: 37030987 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
The majority of intracranial expansive lesions are tumors. However, a wide range of lesions can mimic neoplastic pathology. Differentiating pseudotumoral lesions from brain tumors is crucial to patient management. This article describes the most common intracranial pseudotumors, with a focus on the imaging features that serve as clues to detect pseudotumors.
Collapse
|
16
|
Pinter NK. The Right Imaging Protocol for the Right Patient. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2023; 29:16-26. [PMID: 36795871 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article provides a high-level overview of the challenge of choosing the right imaging approach for an individual patient. It also presents a generalizable approach that can be applied to practice regardless of specific imaging technologies. ESSENTIAL POINTS This article constitutes an introduction to the in-depth, topic-focused analyses in the rest of this issue. It examines the broad principles that guide placing a patient on the right diagnostic trajectory, illustrated with real-life examples of current protocol recommendations and cases of advanced imaging techniques, as well as some thought experiments. Thinking about diagnostic imaging strictly in terms of imaging protocols is often inefficient because these protocols can be vague and have numerous variations. Broadly defined protocols may be sufficient, but their successful use often depends largely on the particular circumstances, with special emphasis on the relationship between neurologists and radiologists.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mayo ZS, Halima A, Broughman JR, Smile TD, Tom MC, Murphy ES, Suh JH, Lo SS, Barnett GH, Wu G, Johnson S, Chao ST. Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:23-31. [PMID: 36633800 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04225-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. RESULTS Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis. CONCLUSION Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - James R Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guiyun Wu
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. .,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amidon RF, Santos-Pinheiro F, Straza M, Prah MA, Mueller WM, Krucoff MO, Connelly JM, Kleefisch CJ, Coss DJ, Cochran EJ, Bovi JA, Schultz CJ, Schmainda KM. Case report: Fractional brain tumor burden magnetic resonance mapping to assess response to pulsed low-dose-rate radiotherapy in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1066191. [PMID: 36561526 PMCID: PMC9763264 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1066191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pulsed low-dose-rate radiotherapy (pLDR) is a commonly used reirradiation technique for recurrent glioma, but its upfront use with temozolomide (TMZ) following primary resection of glioblastoma is currently under investigation. Because standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has limitations in differentiating treatment effect from tumor progression in such applications, perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) can be used to create fractional tumor burden (FTB) maps to spatially distinguish active tumor from treatment-related effect. Methods We performed PWI prior to re-resection in four patients with glioblastoma who had undergone upfront pLDR concurrent with TMZ who had radiographic suspicion for tumor progression at a median of 3 months (0-5 months or 0-143 days) post-pLDR. The pathologic diagnosis was compared to retrospectively-generated FTB maps. Results The median patient age was 55.5 years (50-60 years). All were male with IDH-wild type (n=4) and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) hypermethylated (n=1) molecular markers. Pathologic diagnosis revealed treatment effect (n=2), a mixture of viable tumor and treatment effect (n=1), or viable tumor (n=1). In 3 of 4 cases, FTB maps were indicative of lesion volumes being comprised predominantly of treatment effect with enhancing tumor volumes comprised of a median of 6.8% vascular tumor (6.4-16.4%). Conclusion This case series provides insight into the radiographic response to upfront pLDR and TMZ and the role for FTB mapping to distinguish tumor progression from treatment effect prior to redo-surgery and within 20 weeks post-radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan F. Amidon
- School of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | - Michael Straza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Melissa A. Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Wade M. Mueller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Max O. Krucoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Jennifer M. Connelly
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | - Dylan J. Coss
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Elizabeth J. Cochran
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Joseph A. Bovi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Christopher J. Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diagnostic Value of 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI in Brain Metastases. Clin Nucl Med 2022; 47:1030-1039. [PMID: 36241129 PMCID: PMC9653108 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aims to evaluate whether combined 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI could provide additional diagnostic information compared with MRI alone in brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed or suspected recurrence of brain metastases received dynamic 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI. Lesion detection was evaluated on PET and MRI scans in 2 groups depending on prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS group) or not (no-SRS group). SUVs, time-activity curves, and volumetric analyses of the lesions were performed. RESULTS In the no-SRS group, 29/29 brain lesions were defined as "MRI positive." With PET, 19/29 lesions were detected and had high tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (D max MR , ≥7 mm; SUV max , 1.2-8.4; TBR, 3.9-25.9), whereas 10/29 lesions were undetected (D max MR , ≤8 mm; SUV max , 0.3-1.2; TBR, 1.0-2.7). In the SRS group, 4/6 lesions were defined as "MRI positive," whereas 2/6 lesions were defined as "MRI negative" indicative of radiation necrosis. All 6 lesions were detected with PET (D max MR , ≥15 mm; SUV max , 1.4-4.2; TBR, 3.6-12.6). PET volumes correlated and were comparable in size with contrast-enhanced MRI volumes but were only partially congruent (mean DSC, 0.66). All time-activity curves had an early peak, followed by a plateau or a decreasing slope. CONCLUSIONS 18 F-FACBC PET demonstrated uptake in brain metastases from cancer of different origins (lung, gastrointestinal tract, breast, thyroid, and malignant melanoma). However, 18 F-FACBC PET/MRI did not improve detection of brain metastases compared with MRI but might detect tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancement on MRI. 18 F-FACBC PET should be further evaluated in recurrent brain metastases.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hesse F, Wright AJ, Somai V, Bulat F, Kreis F, Brindle KM. Imaging Glioblastoma Response to Radiotherapy Using 2H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Measurements of Fumarate Metabolism. Cancer Res 2022; 82:3622-3633. [PMID: 35972377 PMCID: PMC9530651 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Early detection of tumor cell death in glioblastoma following treatment with chemoradiation has the potential to distinguish between true disease progression and pseudoprogression. Tumor cell death can be detected noninvasively in vivo by imaging the production of [2,3-2H2]malate from [2,3-2H2]fumarate using 2H magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic imaging. We show here that 2H MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging measurements of [2,3-2H2]fumarate metabolism can detect tumor cell death in orthotopically implanted glioblastoma models within 48 hours following the completion of chemoradiation. Following the injection of [2,3-2H2]fumarate into tumor-bearing mice, production of [2,3-2H2]malate was measured in a human cell line-derived model and in radiosensitive and radioresistant patient-derived models of glioblastoma that were treated with temozolomide followed by targeted fractionated irradiation. The increase in the [2,3-2H2]malate/[2,3-2H2]fumarate signal ratio posttreatment, which correlated with histologic assessment of cell death, was a more sensitive indicator of treatment response than diffusion-weighted and contrast agent-enhanced 1H MRI measurements, which have been used clinically to detect responses of glioblastoma to chemoradiation. Overall, early detection of glioblastoma cell death using 2H MRI of malate production from fumarate could help improve the clinical evaluation of response to chemoradiation. SIGNIFICANCE 2H magnetic resonance imaging of labeled fumarate metabolism can detect early evidence of tumor cell death following chemoradiation, meeting a clinical need to reliably detect treatment response in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Hesse
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alan J. Wright
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vencel Somai
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Flaviu Bulat
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Kreis
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin M. Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Focal cavity radiotherapy after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases: sparing neurotoxicity without compromising locoregional control. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:1105-1111. [PMID: 36149437 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02003-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Does focal cavity radiotherapy after resection of brain metastasis "spare" whole-brain radiotherapy, which is associated with toxicity for patients, through the complete course of their disease without compromising long-term local control of the brain? METHODS We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent adjuvant focal cavity radiotherapy between 2014 and 2021 at our center. RESULTS A total of 83 patients with 86 resected brain metastases were analyzed. 64% had singular, 36% two to four brain metastases. In cases with multiple metastases, omitted lesions were treated with radiosurgery. Median follow-up was 7.3 months (range 0-71.2 months), 1‑year overall survival rate was 57.8% (95% CI 44.9-68.8%). Radiotherapy was administered with a median biologically effective dose (α/β 10) surrounding the planning target volume of 48 Gy (range 23.4-60 Gy). Estimated 1‑year local control rate was 82.7% (95% CI 67.7-91.2%), estimated 1‑year distant brain control rate was 55.7% (95% CI 40.5-68.4%), estimated 1‑year leptomeningeal disease rate was 16.0% (95% CI 7.3-32.9%). Eleven distant brain recurrences could be salvaged with radiosurgery. In the further course of disease, 14 patients (17%) developed disseminated metastatic disease in the brain. Estimated 1‑year free of whole-brain radiotherapy rate was 72.3% (95% CI 57.1-82.9%). All applied treatments led to an estimated 1‑year neuro-control rate of 79.1% (95% CI 65.0-88.0%), estimated 1‑year radionecrosis rate was 23% (95% CI 12.4-40.5%). CONCLUSION In our single-center study, focal cavity radiotherapy was associated with high local control. In three out of four patients, whole-brain radiotherapy could be avoided in the complete course of disease, using radiosurgery as salvage approach without compromising neuro-control.
Collapse
|
22
|
Abdeen N. Editorial for "Histogram Analysis Based on Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging for Differentiation Between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Brain Metastasis and Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two ROI Placements". J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 57:1475-1476. [PMID: 36082991 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nishard Abdeen
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jacob J, Feuvret L, Simon JM, Ribeiro M, Nichelli L, Jenny C, Ricard D, Psimaras D, Hoang-Xuan K, Maingon P. Neurological side effects of radiation therapy. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:2363-2374. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-05944-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
24
|
Salvage Treatment for Progressive Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041096. [PMID: 35205844 PMCID: PMC8870695 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Thirty percent of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, and 15% of patients with the remaining subtypes of breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Available treatment methods include surgery and radiotherapy. However, some individuals will experience intracranial progression despite prior local treatment. This situation remains a challenge. In the case of progressing lesions amenable to local therapy, the choice of a treatment method must consider performance status, cancer burden, possible toxicity, and previously applied therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy rather than whole-brain radiotherapy should be used only if feasible. If local therapy is unfeasible, selected patients, especially those with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, may benefit from systemic therapy. Abstract Survival of patients with breast cancer has increased in recent years due to the improvement of systemic treatment options. Nevertheless, the occurrence of brain metastases is associated with a poor prognosis. Moreover, most drugs do not penetrate the central nervous system because of the blood–brain barrier. Thus, confirmed intracranial progression after local therapy is especially challenging. The available methods of salvage treatment include surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. This narrative review discusses possible strategies of salvage treatment for progressive brain metastases in breast cancer. It covers possibilities of repeated local treatment using the same method as applied previously, other methods of local therapy, and options of salvage systemic treatment. Repeated local therapy may provide a significant benefit in intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. However, it could lead to significant toxicity. Thus, the choice of optimal methods should be carefully discussed within the multidisciplinary tumor board.
Collapse
|