Impact of glycemic treatment choices on cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes

Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Review

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic condition commonly complicating type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to poor quality of life and increased risk of major adverse lower-limb (MALE) and cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE). Therapeutic management of PAD in T2D patients is much more arduous, often due to bilateral, multi-vessel, and distal vascular involvement, in addition to increased systemic polyvascular atherosclerotic burden. On the other hand, the pathophysiological link between PAD and T2D is very complex, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction and increased subclinical inflammation in addition to chronic hyperglycemia. Therefore, the clinical approach should not ignore vascular protection with the aim of reducing limb and overall CV events besides a mere glucose-lowering effect. However, the choice of the best medications in this setting is challenging due to low-grade evidence or lacking targeted studies in PAD patients. The present review highlighted the strong relationship between T2D and PAD, focusing on the best treatment strategy to reduce CV risk and prevent PAD occurrence and worsening in patients with T2D. The Medline databases were searched for studies including T2D and PAD up to June 2024 and reporting the CV effectiveness and safety of the most used glucose-lowering agents, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design, or country. The main outcomes considered were MACE-including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and CV death-and MALE-defined as lower-limb complications, amputations, or need for revascularization. To the best of our current knowledge, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors represent the best choice to reduce CV risk in T2D and PAD settings, but a personalized approach should be considered. GLP-1 receptor agonists should be preferred in subjects with prevalent atherosclerotic burden and a history of previous MALE, while SGLT2 inhibitors should be used in those with heart failure if overall CV benefits outweigh the risk of lower-limb complications.

Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in adults with diabetes mellitus in Hungary: a population-based study

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary artery disease are highly prevalent conditions that are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in Hungary. The conditions are attributed to identical risk factors, and individuals with DM are primarily susceptible to cardiovascular complications, which are the leading causes of death and disability in patients with DM. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CVD in individuals with DM and to investigate the association between potential risk factors and the presence of CVD among individuals with DM in a population-based sample.

Methods

The study was based on data from three waves of the European Health Interview Surveys (EHIS) conducted in Hungary in 2009, 2014, and 2019.

Results

The prevalence of CVD among patients with DM decreased during the study period and that socioeconomic factors, cardiometabolic risk factors including high blood pressure and high cholesterol, and depression are major contributors to CVD burden in patients with DM in Hungary.

Discussion

Our findings suggest the importance of regular check-up for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, better focus on socioeconomic status, as well as ongoing monitoring of mental health among patients with diabetes. Further research is needed to understand the potential causes behind the observed decrease in CVD prevalence.

Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Risk in Lithuania-Results from EUROASPIRE V Survey

Background and Objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines define targets for lifestyle and risk factors for patients at high risk of developing CVD. We assessed the control of these factors, as well as CVD risk perception in patients enrolled into the primary care arm of the European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE V) survey in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: Data were collected as the part of the EUROASPIRE V survey, a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional observational study. Adults without a documented CVD who had been prescribed antihypertensive medicines and/or lipid-lowering medicines and/or treatment for diabetes (diet and/oral antidiabetic medicines and/or insulin) were eligible for the survey. Data were collected through the review of medical records, patients' interview, physical examination and laboratory tests. Results: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. Very few patients reached targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (4.5%), waist circumference (17.4%) and body mass index (15.4%). Only 31% of very high CVD risk patients and 52% of high-risk patients used statins. Blood pressure target was achieved by 115 (57.2%) patients. Only 21.7% of patients at very high actual CVD risk and 27% patients at high risk correctly estimated their risk. Of patients at moderate actual CVD risk, 37.5% patients accurately self-assessed the risk. About 60%-80% of patients reported efforts to reduce the intake of sugar, salt or alcohol; more than 70% of patients were current nonsmokers. Only a third of patients reported weight reduction efforts (33.3%) or regular physical activity (27.4%). Conclusions: The control of cardiovascular risk factors in a selected group of primary prevention patients was unsatisfactory, especially in terms of LDL-C level and body weight parameters. Many patients did not accurately perceive their own risk of developing CVD.

Programmed cell death protein 4 deficiency suppresses foam cell formation by activating autophagy in advanced glycation end-product low-density lipoprotein-induced macrophages

BACKGROUND

Advanced glycation end-product is a modified form of low-density lipoprotein (AGE-LDL) and accelerates atherosclerosis through undefined mechanisms. Programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4), a transcriptional regulator, plays an important role in the regulation of autophagy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of PDCD4 involved in AGE-LDL-induced foam cell formation.

METHODS

The characterization of AGE-LDL was measured by the thiobarbituric assay and agarose gel electrophoresis in vitro. RAW264.7, THP-1 cell line and primary peritoneal macrophages of mice were transfected with shPDCD4 plasmid AGE-LDL-induced foam cell formation was stained by Oil Red, and the levels of autophagy and apoptosis were determined by Western blot analysis. Autophagosome was observed with immunofluorescence microscopy. Mitochondrial membrane potential and autophagic flux were assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

AGE modification resulted in significant reduction of absorbance shown by thiobarbituric assay and augmentation of electrophoresis mobility. Further studies suggest that macrophages exposed AGE-LDL triggered autophagy in the early stage of foam cell formation. PDCD4 deficiency enhanced lipoautophagy but inhibited apoptosis and mitochondria dysfunction. Previous studies have been reported that autophagy is an adaptive response might prevent lesional macrophage apoptosis. In our study, we found PDCD4 deficiency attenuated apoptosis and AGE-LDL-induced foam cell formation relied on increased autophagy.

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed that PDCD4 deficiency can facilitate autophagy and benefit for AGE-LDL-induced foam cell formation.

Tight glycemic control and cardiovascular effects in type 2 diabetic patients

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with poor glycemic control is one of the leading causes for cardiovascular mortality in diabetic patients. Tight glycemic control with glycosylated haemoglobin of <7 gms% is recommended as a routine and < 6.5 gms% is recommended for young and newly diagnosed diabetics. Treatment goal aims at achieving near normal blood glucose level, and directed at management of other co morbid conditions such as obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Oral hypoglycemic agents are the preferred drugs, alone or in combination. Preference for glitazones is declining due to the increasing evidences of associated adverse events. Gliptins appear as promising agents with lesser tendency to cause hypoglycemia, but their long term safety and efficacy is yet to be established. We emphasize the role of preventive measures in prediabetics and in established DM, treatment should be individualized and customized to minimize hypoglycemic effects and to retain quality of life.

Cardiovascular event rates and healthcare resource utilisation among high-risk adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large population-based study

OBJECTIVE

This study ascertained the incidence and resource utilisation of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary bypass surgery or angioplasty among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) over 3 and 5 years.

METHODS

Respondents from the US, population-based SHIELD study with T2DM and at cardiovascular risk were stratified into an established CVD cohort and a risk factors cohort. Proportion of respondents self-reporting a new MI, stroke or revascularisation was calculated. Multivariate discrete logistic hazards models were utilised.

RESULTS

Incidence rate in the established CVD cohort (n = 1198) was 26.3% over 3 years (31.2%, 5 years) and in the risk factors cohort (n = 924) 18.8% over 3 years (26.0%, 5 years). Healthcare resource use was significantly greater among respondents who had a new CV event than among those not experiencing an event (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with T2DM at risk for CVD had a high incidence of CV events in this large US study, which represents a significant burden on the healthcare system.

Midlife type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control as risk factors for cognitive decline in early old age: a post-hoc analysis of the Whitehall II cohort study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk for dementia, but whether it affects cognition before old age is unclear. We investigated whether duration of diabetes in late midlife and poor glycaemic control were associated with accelerated cognitive decline.

METHODS

5653 participants from the Whitehall II cohort study (median age 54.4 years [IQR 50.3-60.3] at first cognitive assessment), were classified into four groups: normoglycaemia, prediabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes, and known diabetes. Tests of memory, reasoning, phonemic and semantic fluency, and a global score that combined all cognitive tests, were assessed three times over 10 years (1997-99, 2002-04, and 2007-09). Mean HbA1c was used to assess glycaemic control during follow-up. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, health-related behaviours, and chronic diseases.

FINDINGS

Compared with normoglycaemic participants, those with known diabetes had a 45% faster decline in memory (10 year difference in decline -0.13 SD, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.00; p=0.046), a 29% faster decline in reasoning (-0.10 SD, -0.19 to -0.01; p=0.026), and a 24% faster decline in the global cognitive score (-0.11 SD, -0.21 to -0.02; p=0.014). Participants with prediabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes had similar rates of decline to those with normoglycaemia. Poorer glycaemic control in participants with known diabetes was associated with a significantly faster decline in memory (-0.12 [-0.22 to -0.01]; p=0.034) and a decline in reasoning that approached significance (-0.07 [-0.15 to 0.00]; p=0.052).

INTERPRETATION

The risk of accelerated cognitive decline in middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes is dependent on both disease duration and glycaemic control.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health, UK Medical Research Council.

The effect of empagliflozin on arterial stiffness and heart rate variability in subjects with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus

Background

Individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus are at high risk for the development of hypertension, contributing to cardiovascular complications. Hyperglycaemia-mediated neurohormonal activation increases arterial stiffness, and is an important contributing factor for hypertension. Since the sodium glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin lowers blood pressure and HbA1c in type 1 diabetes mellitus, we hypothesized that this agent would also reduce arterial stiffness and markers of sympathetic nervous system activity.

Methods

Blood pressure, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability (HRV) and circulating adrenergic mediators were measured during clamped euglycaemia (blood glucose 4–6 mmol/L) and hyperglycaemia (blood glucose 9–11 mmol/L) in 40 normotensive type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Studies were repeated after 8 weeks of empagliflozin (25 mg once daily).

Results

In response to empagliflozin during clamped euglycaemia, systolic blood pressure (111 ± 9 to 109 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.02) and augmentation indices at the radial (-52% ± 16 to -57% ± 17, p = 0.0001), carotid (+1.3 ± 1 7.0 to -5.7 ± 17.0%, p < 0.0001) and aortic positions (+0.1 ± 13.4 to -6.2 ± 14.3%, p < 0.0001) declined. Similar effects on arterial stiffness were observed during clamped hyperglycaemia without changing blood pressure under this condition. Carotid-radial pulse wave velocity decreased significantly under both glycemic conditions (p ≤ 0.0001), while declines in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were only significant during clamped hyperglycaemia (5.7 ± 1.1 to 5.2 ± 0.9 m/s, p = 0.0017). HRV, plasma noradrenalin and adrenaline remained unchanged under both clamped euglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions.

Conclusions

Empagliflozin is associated with a decline in arterial stiffness in young type 1 diabetes mellitus subjects. The underlying mechanisms may relate to pleiotropic actions of SGLT2 inhibition, including glucose lowering, antihypertensive and weight reduction effects.

Trial registration

Clinical trial registration: NCT01392560

Comparative analysis of the neurovascular injury and functional outcomes in experimental stroke models in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats

Diabetes worsens functional outcome and is associated with greater hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after ischemic stroke. We have shown that diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats develop greater HT and neurological deficit despite smaller infarcts after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) with the suture model. However, the impact of (1) the duration of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R); (2) the method of ischemia; and (3) acute glycemic control on neurovascular injury and functional outcome in diabetic stroke remained unanswered. Wistar and GK rats were subjected to variable MCAO by suture or embolus occlusion. A group of GK rats were treated with insulin or metformin before stroke with suture occlusion. In all groups, infarct size, edema, HT occurrence and severity, and functional outcome were measured. Infarct size at 24h was smaller in GK rats with both suture and embolic MCAO, but expanded with longer reperfusion period. Edema and HT were increased in GK rats after 90min and 3h occlusion with the suture model, but not in the embolic MCAO. Neurological deficit was greater in diabetic rats. These findings suggest that diabetes accelerates the development of HT and amplifies vascular damage in the suture model where blood flow is rapidly reestablished. Acute metformin treatment worsened the infarct size, HT, and behavior outcome, whereas insulin treatment showed a protective effect. These results suggest that the impact of ischemia/reperfusion on neurovascular injury and functional outcome especially in disease models needs to be fully characterized using different models of stroke to model the human condition.

Cardiovascular implications of antihyperglycemic therapies for type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Several risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, are often present in varying combinations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with a clustering of these risk factors, termed the metabolic syndrome, are at greater risk for CVD than are patients with only a single risk factor. Although glycemic control is the central feature of type 2 DM management, patients require an individualized approach to therapy that takes their other CVD risk factors into account.

OBJECTIVE

This review examined the effects of antidiabetes therapy on glycemic control, as well as its potential to affect body weight, serum lipids, and blood pressure (BP), and thus CVD risk.

METHODS

Information was obtained by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1995 through March 2010. The search terms included type 2 DM, metabolic syndrome, CV complications of type 2 DM, and therapy for type 2 DM. Articles that described relevant details of the metabolic syndrome, CV complications of type 2 DM, and effects of antidiabetes therapy on glycosylated hemoglobin, body weight, serum lipids, and BP were selected for in-depth review. Only English language publications were reviewed. Clinical trials, meta-analyses, and review articles on the key words were preferentially selected for review and analysis. Non-English language publications, case reports, letters to the editor, and similar types of publications were excluded.

RESULTS

Although all approved antidiabetes agents lowered glucose, their effect on other CV risk factors, such as BP, lipids, and weight, differed significantly. Therapy with insulin, the sulfonylureas, and the thiazolidinediones was associated with weight gain. Metformin and the dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors were generally considered weight neutral, whereas the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and amylin agonists were associated with weight loss. Metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinedioness, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors had modest effects on serum lipid levels and BP. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists generally had beneficial effects on serum lipid levels and systolic and diastolic BP.

CONCLUSION

A wide variety of agents were available to aid glycemic control in patients with type 2 DM. These agents had variable effects on known CV risk factors that might be present in this patient population, including excess body weight, elevated BP, and increased serum lipids. Some of the newer agents improved glycemic control while also having potentially favorable effects on these CV risk factors. The impact of various agents on known CV risk factors should be considered when selecting a therapeutic regimen.

Macrovascular effects and safety issues of therapies for type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes has long been recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, peripheral arterial disease, cardiomyopathy, and congestive heart failure. Cardiovascular (CV) complications are the leading cause of comorbidity and death in the patient with diabetes. Vascular complications of diabetes also extend to microvascular disease, manifest as diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. The impact of glycemic control in reducing microvascular complications is well established. Although more controversial, there is also evidence that glycemic control can limit macrovascular disease, including CAD, peripheral arterial disease, and stroke. Glycemic control in the context of type 2 diabetes, as well as prediabetes, is also intertwined with CV risk factors such as obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and blood pressure control. Similarly, major issues and concerns have arisen around the CV safety of antidiabetic therapy. Together, these issues have focused attention on the need to understand the CV effects of current treatments for type 2 diabetes and the optimal strategies for care of patients with this disease.

Incretin-based therapies in complex patients: practical implications and opportunities for maximizing clinical outcomes: a discussion with Dr. Vivian A. Fonseca

Elderly patients and patients with renal impairment present unique challenges in the management of diabetes mellitus. Impaired renal function is a common comorbidity (or complication) associated with type 2 diabetes, as well as a complicating factor in the treatment of the disease. Renal insufficiency, which can result in elevated plasma concentrations of pharmaceutical agents, may preclude the use of some antihyperglycemic medications and require that the dosages of others be reduced. Failure to select and dose medications carefully in these patients may increase the risk of hypoglycemia and other adverse effects. For example, elevated plasma concentrations of some sulfonylureas may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. Because patients with chronic renal insufficiency tend to retain fluids, treatment with a thiazolidinedione--a class of agents associated with fluid retention--may exacerbate the risk of edema. Older patients with type 2 diabetes--like patients with renal insufficiency an important and populous subgroup--also have issues with therapy selection and dosing regimens. As a result of the effects of aging on kidney function, older patients may also be subject to elevated plasma levels with consequent additional risk of hypoglycemia and other adverse events. Because older patients tend to be treated with multiple medications for multiple comorbidities, it becomes challenging to design regimens that avoid or reduce the risk of drug-drug interactions. For both older patients and patients with chronic renal insufficiency, the most important drug-related adverse effect to avoid is hypoglycemia. Accordingly, incretin-based agents have an advantage because they are unlikely to cause hypoglycemia.

Improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia and arterial stiffness upon switching from premixed human insulin 30/70 to biphasic insulin aspart 30/70

Postprandial hyperglycemia is known to be associated with increasing cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) reflects arterial stiffness and is more useful for predicting coronary atherosclerosis than intima-media thickness. Premixed human insulin 30/70 (BHI30) containing rapid-acting insulin has been used conventionally as a biphasic insulin. Recently, a biphasic insulin analogue preparation, biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp30), containing ultrarapid-acting insulin has been approved and expected to improve postprandial hyperglycemia. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of switching the biphasic insulin from BHI30 to BIAsp30 on arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Twenty-six type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (glycosylated hemoglobin >6.5%) who were already receiving biphasic insulin therapy with BHI30 twice daily were observed for 3 months. Afterward, BHI30 was switched to BIAsp30. At 3 months after switching, relative mobility of the peak of LDL fraction decreased significantly (from 0.3462 ± 0.041 to 0.3356 ± 0.035, P < .01); and CAVI also decreased significantly (from 9.77 ± 1.11 to 9.35 ± 1.17 m/s, P < .005). A significant negative correlation was observed between the change in CAVI and change in 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) (r = -0.3929, P < .05). A stronger correlation between change in CAVI and change in 1,5-AG was observed in the subgroup of patients whose 1,5-AG levels were elevated after switching (r = -0.6261, P < .05) compared with all subjects. These results suggest that switching biphasic insulin from BHI30 to BIAsp30 improves arterial stiffness, and the improvement of arterial stiffness may be associated with improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia.

Pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients inadequately controlled on insulin

Insulin resistance and impaired beta-cell function are primary defects that occur early in the course of development of type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance leads to hyperinsulinemia in order to maintain normal glucose tolerance. In most cases of type 2 diabetes, beta-cell dysfunction develops subsequent to the development of insulin resistance, and it is not until such beta-cell dysfunction develops that any abnormality in glucose tolerance is seen. Insulin resistance is a primary defect in type 2 diabetes. The risk of coronary heart disease is significantly increased in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovascular disease causes 80% of all diabetic mortality, and in 75% of those cases, it is a result of coronary atherosclerosis. These points provide a rationale for early and aggressive management of cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Thiazolidinediones represent an effective tool for targeting some features of this increased risk as they decrease insulin resistance and can prevent and/or delay diabetes progression.

Liraglutide, the once-daily human GLP-1 analog, in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disorder characterized by continuous deterioration in β-cell function requiring an escalation of therapeutic efforts in order to maintain glycemic control. Recent studies have demonstrated that the current antidiabetic treatments, including metformin, sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones, are not durable, resulting in an increase of hemoglobin A_1c over time with all three therapies. Many current antidiabetic treatments (sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones and insulin) are associated with the undesirable feature of weight gain. In addition, sulfonylureas and insulin are associated with an increased risk for hypoglycemia. The unsatisfactory results with the current pharmacological therapies for Type 2 diabetes have encouraged the development of a number of novel treatments. Among these are the incretin-based therapies, which include glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists; this article focuses on one of these agonists, the human GLP-1 analog liraglutide. Liraglutide has been approved for use in Type 2 diabetic individuals in several countries, including Europe, the USA and Japan.

Assessing the cardio-cerebrovascular safety of vildagliptin: meta-analysis of adjudicated events from a large Phase III type 2 diabetes population

AIM

To assess the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (CCV) safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor vildagliptin.

METHODS

Data were pooled from 25 Phase III studies of vildagliptin, used either as monotherapy or combination therapy, with durations of 12 weeks to > or = 2 years. The safety of vildagliptin [50 mg qd (N = 1393) or 50 mg bid (N = 6116)] was assessed relative to a pool of all comparators [both placebo and active comparators (N = 6061)]. CCV events were adjudicated in a prospective, blinded fashion by an independent CCV adjudication committee. Meta-analysis of confirmed CCV events was performed with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs); categories included in the composite endpoint were acute coronary syndrome, transient ischaemic attack (with imaging evidence of infarction), stroke and CCV death. Subgroup analyses by age (< and > or = 65 years), gender and cardiovascular (CV) risk status [high CV risk status defined as a previous history of events in the Standard MedDRA Queries of ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure, ischaemic cerebrovascular conditions and/or embolic/thrombotic events, arterial) were also carried out. In addition, unadjusted and exposure-adjusted incidences are presented for both the composite endpoint and its components.

RESULTS

Relative to all comparators, the RRs for the composite endpoint were < 1 for both vildagliptin 50 mg qd [RR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.37, 2.11)] and vildagliptin 50 mg bid [RR = 0.84; 95% CI (0.62, 1.14)]. The results were consistent across subgroups defined by age, gender and CV risk status, including the higher CV risk subgroups of elderly patients [RR for vildagliptin 50 mg bid vs. all comparators = 1.04; 95% CI (0.62, 1.73)], males [RR = 0.87; 95% CI (0.60, 1.24)] or patients with a high CV risk status [RR = 0.78; 95% CI (0.51, 1.19)]. The exposure-adjusted incidences of each component of the composite endpoint for vildagliptin 50 mg bid were also lower than or similar to those of all comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large meta-analysis, vildagliptin was not associated with an increased risk of adjudicated CCV events relative to all comparators in the broad population of type 2 diabetes including patients at increased risk of CCV events.

Resistance exercise training lowers HbA1c more than aerobic training in adults with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 10 weeks of resistance or treadmill exercises on glycemic indices levels prior to and immediately following exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

Twenty inactive subjects (mean age 53.5 years) with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the study. Baseline HbA1c, blood glucose levels, heart rate, and blood pressure were measured for each subject prior to the initiation of the exercise program. Subsequently, subjects were matched to age, waist circumference and sex and assigned to either isocaloric resistance or treadmill exercise groups, which met 3 times per week for 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a reduction in pre and post-exercise blood glucose and HbA1c values. There was no change in resting blood pressure or heart rate in either group during the course of the 10 week intervention. The group receiving resistance exercises showed significant differences in the daily pre-exercise plasma glucose readings between the beginning and end of the exercise protocol (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements in the mean HbA1c reading pre and post training in both groups (p < 0.001). However, the greater reduction was noted in the resistance exercise group, and at 10 weeks their HbA1c levels were significantly lower than the group that received treadmill exercises (p < 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Ten weeks of resistance exercises were associated with a significantly better glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes compared to treadmill exercise.

A cardiologic approach to non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with heart disease

Classical non-insulin antihyperglycemic drugs currently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) comprise five groups: biguanides, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, glitazones and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Novel compounds are represented by the incretin mimetic drugs like glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1), the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) agonists (glitazars) and amylin mimetic drugs. We review the cardiovascular effects of these drugs in an attempt to improve knowledge regarding their potential risks when treating T2DM in cardiac patients. Metformin may lead to lethal lactic acidosis, especially in patients with clinical conditions that predispose to this complication, such as recent myocardial infarction, heart or renal failure. Sulfonylureas exert their effect by closing the ATP-dependent potassium channels. This prevents the opening of these channels during myocardial ischemia, impeding the necessary hyperpolarization that protects the cell. The combined sulfonylurea/metformin therapy reveals additive effects on mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Meglitinides effects are similar to those of sulfonylureas, due to their almost analogous mechanism of action. Glitazones lower leptin levels, leading to weight gain and are unsafe in NYHA class III or IV. The long-term effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors on morbidity and mortality rates is yet unknown. The incretin GLP-1 is associated with reductions in body weight and appears to present positive inotropic effects. DPP-4 inhibitors influences on the cardiovascular system seem to be neutral and patients do not gain weight. The future of glitazars is presently uncertain following concerns about their safety. The amylin mimetic drug paramlintide, while a satisfactory adjuvant medication in insulin-dependent diabetes, is unlikely to play a major role in the management of T2DM. Summarizing the present information it can be stated that 1. Four out the five classical oral antidiabetic drug groups present proven or potential cardiac hazards; 2. These hazards are not mere 'side effects', but biochemical phenomena which are deeply rooted in the drugs' mechanism of action; 3. Current data indicate that the combined glibenclamide/metformin therapy seems to present special risk and should be avoided in the long-term management of T2DM with proven CAD; 4. Glitazones should be avoided in patients with overt heart failure; 5, The novel incretin mimetic drugs and DPP-4 inhibitors--while usually inadequate as monotherapy--appear to be satisfactory adjuvant drugs due to the lack of known undesirable cardiovascular effects; 6. Customized antihyperglycemic pharmacological approaches should be implemented for the achievement of optimal treatment of T2DM patients with heart disease. In this context, it should be carefully taken into consideration whether the leading clinical status is CAD or heart failure.