Pain and Itch Are Dual Burdens in Atopic Dermatitis

Lebrikizumab Combined with Topical Corticosteroids Improves Patient-reported Outcomes in Japanese Patients with Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis

Lebrikizumab has previously demonstrated efficacy in Phase 3 trials: ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 (as monotherapy), ADhere, and ADhere-J (in combination with topical corticosteroids). Here, the impact of lebrikizumab combined with low- to mid-potency topical corticosteroids on patient-reported outcomes at 16 weeks in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis is evaluated. Eligible patients (n = 286) were randomized 2:2:3 to receive placebo+ topical corticosteroids, 250 mg lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (LEBQ4W+topical corticosteroids, 500 mg loading dose at baseline), or 250 mg lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (LEBQ2W+ topical corticosteroids, 500 mg loading dose at baseline and Week 2) by subcutaneous injection. All PRO endpoints for the study were met; patients in the lebrikizumab in combination with topical corticosteroids groups demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in combination with topical corticosteroids in Skin Pain NRS, DLQI, POEM, WPAI-AD, and SCORAD scales. Lebrikizumab combined with topical corticosteroids compared with placebo+topical corticosteroids improved patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Atopic Dermatitis Itch: Scratching for an Explanation

Chronic pruritus is a cardinal symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD). The mechanisms underlying atopic itch involve intricate crosstalk among skin, immune components, and neural components. In this review, we explore these mechanisms, focusing on key players and interactions that induce and exacerbate itch. We discuss the similarities and differences between pruritus and pain in patients with AD as well as the relationship between pruritus and factors such as sweat and the skin microbiome. Furthermore, we explore novel targets that could provide significant itch relief in these patients as well as exciting future research directions to better understand atopic pruritus in darker skin types.

Similarities and differences in peripheral itch and pain pathways in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is predominantly characterized by intense itching, but concomitant skin pain is experienced by more than 40% of patients. Patients with AD display considerable somatosensory aberrations, including increased nerve sensitivity to itch stimuli (hyperknesis), perception of itch from innocuous stimuli (alloknesis), or perception of pain from innocuous stimuli (allodynia). This review summarizes the current understanding of the similarities and differences in the peripheral mechanisms underlying itch and pain in AD. These distinct yet reciprocal sensations share many similarities in the peripheral nervous system, including common mediators (such as serotonin, endothelin-1, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin), receptors (such as members of the G protein-coupled receptor family and Toll-like receptors), and ion channels for signal transduction (such as certain members of the transient receptor potential [TRP] cation channels). Itch-responding neurons are also sensitive to pain stimuli. However, there are distinct differences between itch and pain signaling. For example, specific immune responses are associated with pain (type 1 and/or type 3 cytokines and certain chemokine C-C [CCL2, CCL5] and C-X-C [CXCL] motif ligands) and itch (type 2 cytokines, including IL-31, and periostin). The TRP melastatin channels TRPM2 and TRPM3 have a role in pain but no known role in itch. Activation of μ-opioid receptors is known to alleviate pain but exacerbate itch. Understanding the connection between itch and pain mechanisms may offer new insights into the treatment of chronic pain and itch in AD.

Diet and skin health: The good and the bad

The skin protects humans from pathogens, ultraviolet light, chemicals, mechanical, thermal, and physical injuries as well as hazardous substances. Other important roles of the skin include the regulation of several important physiological processes of the body, sensing stimuli, synthesis of vitamin D, and immune surveillance. However, aging, diseases and environmental conditions significantly change the skin's behavior and functioning. The treatment and prevention strategies for various skin diseases especially photoaging usually include topical treatment with medical cosmetology, active ingredients and other physical means of photoprotection. In recent times, however, there is an increasing consciousness about the role of diet and nutrition in skin health with certain dietary components emerging as an adequate alternative approach to alleviate and prevent both endogenous and exogenous aging symptoms. Therefore, this narrative review uniquely discusses the basic structure of the skin and also addresses common dermatological signs of damaged skin, the impacts of unhealthy diet habits on the skin, and the beneficial effects of some healthy diet habits on skin health. The information and data were collated from various literature databases and resources such as Science Direct, PubMed, Wiley, Springer, Taylor and Francis, Inflibnet, Scopus, Google, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). In conclusion, diet and nutrition play essential roles in the optimum functioning of the human body, including the skin. Thus, certain diet habits such as less water intake, high-fat diet, refined sugar, and certain food additives are unhealthy and harmful to the skin while alternative healthy diet habits such as adequate water intake; consumption of antioxidants and polyphenolic-rich fruits, vegetables, nuts, and legumes; a low glycemic index diet; probiotics; and phytoestrogens should be adopted to enhance skin health.

Which Clinical Measurement Tools for Atopic Dermatitis Severity Make the Most Sense in Clinical Practice?

Assessment of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is essential for therapeutic decision making and monitoring treatment progress. However, there are a myriad of clinical measurement tools available, some of which are impractical for routine clinical use despite being recommended for clinical trials in AD. For measurement tools to be used in clinical practice, they should be valid, reliable, rapidly completed, and scored, and easily incorporated into existing clinic workflows. This narrative review addresses content, validity, and feasibility, and provides a simplified repertoire of assessments for clinical assessment of AD based on prior evidence and expert opinion. Tools that may be feasible for clinical practice include patient-reported outcomes (eg, dermatology life quality index, patient-oriented eczema measure, numerical rating scales for itch, pain, and sleep disturbance, AD Control Tool, and patient-reported global assessment), and clinician-reported outcomes (eg, body surface area and investigator's global assessment). AD is associated with variable clinical signs, symptoms, extent of lesions, longitudinal course, comorbidities, and impacts. Any single domain is insufficient to holistically characterize AD severity, select therapy, or monitor treatment response. A combination of these tools is recommended to balance completeness and feasibility.

Cutaneous Components Leading to Pruritus, Pain, and Neurosensitivity in Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing immunoinflammatory skin condition characterized by sensations such as pruritis, pain, and neuronal hypersensitivity. The mechanisms underlying these sensations are multifactorial and involve complex crosstalk among several cutaneous components. This review explores the role these components play in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis. In the skin intercellular spaces, sensory nerves interact with keratinocytes and immune cells via myriad mediators and receptors. These interactions generate action potentials that transmit pruritis and pain signals from the peripheral nervous system to the brain. Keratinocytes, the most abundant cell type in the epidermis, are key effector cells, triggering crosstalk with immune cells and sensory neurons to elicit pruritis, pain, and inflammation. Filaggrin expression by keratinocytes is reduced in atopic dermatitis, causing a weakened skin barrier and elevated skin pH. Fibroblasts are the main cell type in the dermis and, in atopic dermatitis, appear to reduce keratinocyte differentiation, further weakening the skin barrier. Fibroblasts and mast cells promote inflammation while dermal dendritic cells appear to attenuate inflammation. Inflammatory cytokines and chemokines play a major role in AD pathogenesis. Type 2 immune responses typically generate pruritis, and the type 1 and type 3 responses generate pain. Type 2 responses and increased skin pH contribute to barrier dysfunction and promote dysbiosis of the skin microbiome, causing the proliferation of Staphyloccocus aureus. In conclusion, understanding the dynamic interactions between cutaneous components in AD could drive the development of therapies to improve the quality of life for patients with AD.

Abrocitinib Provides Rapid and Sustained Improvement in Skin Pain and Is Associated with Improved Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult and Adolescent Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Skin pain in atopic dermatitis (AD) increases with disease severity and is associated with substantial quality of life (QoL) burden.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate abrocitinib efficacy on skin pain and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included data with abrocitinib administered as monotherapy (pooled phase 2b [NCT02780167] and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 [NCT03349060] and JADE MONO-2 [NCT03575871]) or in combination with topical therapy (phase 3 JADE COMPARE [NCT03720470] and JADE TEEN [NCT03796676]). Patients received oral, once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo for 12 or 16 weeks (JADE COMPARE). Skin pain was rated using the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) skin pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) item ("How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?") on a scale from 0 (not painful) to 10 (extremely painful). Itch (Peak Pruritus NRS) and QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index or Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was analyzed using mixed-effects repeated measures modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 1,822 patients (monotherapy pool, n = 942; JADE COMPARE, n = 595; and JADE TEEN, n = 285) were analyzed. LSM change from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score was significantly greater with abrocitinib versus placebo from week 2 through week 12 or 16 across all 3 study populations and occurred in a dose-dependent manner. A greater proportion of patients achieved a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score with abrocitinib (200 mg and 100 mg) versus placebo in the monotherapy pool (56% and 38% vs. 12%; week 12), JADE COMPARE (72% and 52% vs. 26%; week 16), and JADE TEEN (51% and 60% vs. 31%; week 12). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients achieved a stringent threshold of skin pain improvement (PSAAD skin pain score <2) with abrocitinib versus placebo. Adults and adolescents who achieved a ≥4-point improvement in skin pain reported greater QoL improvement than those who did not achieve a ≥4-point improvement. A positive correlation (≥0.3) was observed between skin pain and QoL and separately between skin pain and itch across the 3 study populations.

CONCLUSION

Abrocitinib as monotherapy or in combination with topical therapy improved skin pain and was associated with improved QoL in both adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD across all evaluated studies.

Mental health comorbidity in youth with atopic dermatitis: A narrative review of possible mechanisms

The presence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in youth has been linked to a variety of mental health concerns including disruptive behavior, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and diagnoses of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. However, the factors accounting for these relationships are not well understood. The current review summarizes possible mechanisms identified in previous research and highlights areas for future investigation. Among the primary mechanisms studied to date, child sleep is the only factor that has been characterized in relative detail, with findings generally supporting the mediating role of sleep problems in the relationship between AD and psychological symptoms. There is substantial evidence suggesting a negative impact of child AD on parent mental health and the impact of parent mental health on child psychological functioning, although the latter has not been assessed specifically in populations of children with AD. There is also preliminary support for other mechanisms, including pruritus and pain, atopic comorbidities, social functioning, and systemic antihistamine use, in the development of mental health concerns in pediatric AD. Furthermore, research suggests the presence of bidirectional relationships between AD and psychological functioning via inflammatory responses to stress and impaired treatment adherence. Overall, significant additional research is needed to better characterize the nature and magnitude of the relationships among these multiple mechanisms and various psychosocial outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings to date support routine screening of psychological health in patients with AD as well as screening for potential risk factors, which may also serve as targets of therapeutic intervention.

Burden of Disease and Unmet Needs in Atopic Dermatitis: Results From a Patient Survey

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects 2%-10% of adults worldwide. Occurrence and severity of symptoms and treatment success vary among patients. Objective: To determine disease severity, burden, and treatment use and satisfaction in adults with AD. Methods: An international internet-based survey was conducted (October 5-November 1, 2021) in participants with AD from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results: Of 2005 AD patients surveyed, 92% had body surface area (BSA) involvement <10%. Itch was the most bothersome symptom; 48.5% of participants reported severe itch in the past week (Itch Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] 7-10; 45.9% for BSA <10%, 75.0% for BSA ≥10%). Most participants reported moderate or severe sleep disturbance in the past week (Sleep NRS 4-10; 67.1% for BSA <10%, 92.3% for BSA ≥10%). Itch was the top reason for participants' most recent health care provider visit; reducing itching was their top treatment goal. Topical therapies, which were most commonly used, resulted in low treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: Itch was the most bothersome AD symptom. Although clinical development has focused on improving skin lesions, improving itch is patients' top treatment goal. This survey highlights the need for systemic antipruritic therapies that could reduce itch in nonlesional and lesional skin.

Can chronic spontaneous urticarial produce symptoms of neuropathic pain?

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a condition that is associated with recurrent pruritic hives and/or angioedema lasting for more than 6 weeks and is known to affect 1% of the population. Neuropathic pain can be defined as abnormal pain in the peripheral or central nervous system following injury and results from dysfunctions in the peripheral or central nervous system without peripheral nociceptor stimulation. Histamine appears in the pathogenesis of both the CSU and diseases of the neuropathic pain spectrum.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the symptoms of neuropathic pain in patients with CSU using scales.

METHOD

Fifty-one patients with CSU and 47 sex- and age-matched healthy controls were included in the study.

RESULTS

The results of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire revealed the scores in the sensory and affective domains, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and pain indices to be significantly higher in the patient group (p < 0.05 for all cases), while the overall pain assessment and sensory assessment based on the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) pain scale were also significantly higher in the patient group. Based on the assumption that scores of > 12 indicated neuropathy, 27 (53%) of the patients in the patient group and 8 (17%) in the control group were found to have neuropathy (p < 0.05).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Cross-sectional study, small patient sample and use of self-reported scales.

CONCLUSION

In addition to itching, patients with CSU should be aware of the potential for the association of neuropathic pain. In this chronic disease that is known to affect the quality of life, using an integrated approach with the patients and identifying accompanying problems are as important as treating the dermatological disorder.

Impact of itch and skin pain on quality of life in adult patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan: results from a real-world, point-in-time, survey of physicians and patients

OBJECTIVE

Itch is a common symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), however, there is limited evidence of the frequency and association of skin pain alongside itch. This study assessed the incremental dual burden and impact of itch and skin pain on satisfaction, quality of life and work productivity in patients with AD in Japan.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the 2020 Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists (n = 56) and their patients with history of moderate/severe AD (n = 265). Patients were grouped accordingly: no itch/skin pain (No I/SP, reference group, n = 89), itch/no skin pain (I-only, n = 71), and itch and skin pain (I + SP, n = 26). Descriptive analyses were performed alongside a range of regression models, dependent on outcome variables.

RESULTS

I + SP patients had a 4.97-point worse POEM score (p = .005) and 14.5% more overall work impairment (p = .034) versus the reference group. I-only and I + SP patients were 8.92 and 23.5 times more likely, respectively, to experience sleep disruption on a day-to-day basis (both p < .001). I + SP patients were 4.6 times more likely to be bothered by their symptoms (p = .034), had a mean EASI score 6.7 points higher (p = .008) and had 1.39 more areas affected (p = .001). I + SP patients were 7.26 times more likely to express dissatisfaction with lack of improvement in their condition and 8 times more likely to be dissatisfied with convenience of treatment (both p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This dissatisfaction, alongside variations in reported symptomatic burdens, suggests that physicians could consider alternative and/or novel therapeutic approaches for the management of both itch and skin pain.

Druggable Targets and Compounds with Both Antinociceptive and Antipruritic Effects

Pain and itch are both important manifestations of various disorders, such as herpes zoster, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Growing evidence suggests that both sensations have shared mediators, overlapping neural circuitry, and similarities in sensitization processes. In fact, pain and itch coexist in some disorders. Determining pharmaceutical agents and targets for treating pain and itch concurrently is of scientific and clinical relevance. Here we review the neurobiology of pain and itch and discuss the pharmaceutical targets as well as novel compounds effective for the concurrent treatment of these sensations.

Dermatological Conditions Inducing Acute and Chronic Pain

Pain is a common condition in dermatology. The aim of this review is to analyse the characteristics of pain in dermatology. Some skin diseases are conventionally known to cause pain; e.g. ulcers, pyoderma gangrenosum and herpes zoster. Common dermatoses, such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis, can also cause significant pain. Some conditions are characterized by neuropathic pain and/or pruritus, without visible primary lesions: e.g. the neurocutaneous diseases, including small fibre neuropathies. Patients often fear pain in skin surgery; however, surgical procedures are rather well tolerated and any pain is mainly due to administration of local anaesthetic. Some therapies may also be uncomfortable for the patient, such as photodynamic therapy or aesthetic procedures. Thus, pain in dermatology is common, and its aetiology and characteristics are very varied. Knowledge of the different situations that cause pain will enable dermatologists to propose suitable analgesic solutions.

Rapid Improvement in Skin Pain Severity and Its Impact on Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis From a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Baricitinib Phase 3 Study

BACKGROUND

Skin pain (discomfort/soreness) is a common symptom associated with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rapid changes in skin pain severity with baricitinib, and its impact on patient quality of life (QoL) in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to topical therapy.

METHODS

Adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to topical therapies (N = 440, BREEZE-AD5 [NCT03435081]) were randomized to once-daily placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, or baricitinib 2 mg for 16 weeks. Change in Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores were assessed for the randomized population. Skin Pain NRS and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were assessed for Skin Pain Response groups and patients with Body Surface Area (BSA) 10% to 50%.

RESULTS

Skin Pain NRS improvement was significant versus placebo by day 1 baricitinib 2 mg (least squares mean [LSM] difference -4.4%, P = .048) and by day 2 for baricitinib 1 mg (-6.7%, P = .011). As measured weekly, improvement was significant starting at Week 1 and remained significant through Week 16 for both doses. At Week 16, 70.9% of Skin Pain NRS responders vs 10.4% of nonresponders had a clinically meaningful improvement in DLQI (P < .0001). At week 16, LSM DLQI change from baseline was -11.1 for all Skin Pain NRS responders versus -3.5 for nonresponders (P < .0001). Patients with BSA 10% to 50% showed similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate-to-severe AD, treated with baricitinib, reported rapid improvements in skin pain severity by day 1 for baricitinib 2 mg and day 2 for baricitinib 1 mg and remained effective through 16 weeks of treatment, which positively impacted patient QoL.

Treatment Outcomes Associated With Dupilumab Use in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: 1-Year Results From the RELIEVE-AD Study

Importance

Clinical trial populations may not reflect clinical practice: knowledge generated in other settings can inform clinical decision-making.

Objective

To evaluate self-reported disease control and quality of life after initiating dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in the the clinical setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study using an online survey administered prior to (baseline) and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after dupilumab initiation included adults with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated treatment with dupilumab through the US patient support program and agreed to participate in the study. Data were collected between January 2018 and January 2020 and the analysis was completed in May 2020.

Interventions

Clinically driven treatment with dupilumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Disease control measured by the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT); concomitant AD therapies; satisfaction with therapy; skin symptoms (skin pain/soreness, hot/burning feeling, sensitivity to touch) assessed using numerical rating scales; flares; health-related quality of life assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index; sleep problems assessed using the ADCT item and a stand-alone question; and the AD-specific Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire.

Results

Of 699 patients who initiated dupilumab (431 [61.7%] female, 515 [73.7%] White), 632 and 483 completed the survey at months 1 and 12, respectively. As-observed results showed that most patients achieved adequate disease control (ADCT total score) at month 1 with further improvement at month 12 (385 of 632 patients [60.9%] and 374 of 483 [77.4%] for the 2 time points, respectively, vs 41 of 699 [5.3%] at baseline; both P < .001). Use of other AD therapies was reduced at each follow-up vs baseline, including topical and systemic corticosteroids, which were reduced at month 12 to 40.4% (195 of 483 patients) and 6.2% (30 of 483 patients), respectively, from 68.1% (476 of 699) and 34.9% (244 of 699), respectively, at baseline (both P < .001 vs baseline). Patient satisfaction with AD treatment was higher than baseline (120 of 699 [17.7%]) at each follow-up to 85.1% (411 of 483) at month 12 (P < .001). At each follow-up, patients reported reductions in flares, itch, skin symptoms, and improved sleep, health-related quality of life, and daily activities vs baseline. Results were consistent based on observed data and imputed data using pattern mixture models for missing data.

Conclusions and Relevance

Consistent with patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials, this cohort study found that dupilumab treatment was associated with rapid and sustained disease control for up to 12 months as demonstrated by statistically significant improvements relative to baseline on all patient-reported outcomes including treatment satisfaction.

Characteristics, mechanism, and management of pain in atopic dermatitis: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Developments in basic science and clinical research have increased our understanding of AD. Although pain as a symptom of AD is underemphasized in previous studies, multiple researchers address pain as a frequent burden of AD. However, the exact role of pain in AD is not fully understood.

AIMS

Our review aimed to summarize the current evidence focusing on characteristics, mechanism, and management of pain in AD.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We conducted a thorough literature review in the PubMed database to figure out different aspects discussing pain in AD, including pain symptoms, burden, the relationship between pain and itch, mechanism, and pain management in AD.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

AD patients affected by skin pain vary from 42.7%-92.2% with remarkable intensity and heavy burden. Skin pain and itch interacted both in symptoms and mechanisms. Atopic skin with the impaired barrier, neurogenic inflammation mediators, peripheral and central sensitization of pain may possibly explain pain mechanism in AD. Future research is needed to clarify the commonality and disparity of pain and itch in AD in order to seek efficacious medications and treatment.

Dermatology for the internist: optimal diagnosis and management of atopic dermatitis

Internists are front-line health care providers that commonly provide the first encounter to patients for dermatological conditions, especially atopic dermatitis (AD). Internists need to be comfortable with managing mild-moderate AD in their practices. Criteria and guidelines established in dermatology literature are available to help the general practitioner diagnose and treat AD. AD is a systemic disease associated with multiple cutaneous and extra-cutaneous comorbidities that warrant screening by internists, especially mental health conditions. Environmental factors may play a role in the development or worsening of AD; however, there is currently no strong evidence to guide specific population- or clinic-based interventions for their avoidance. While food allergies are common in AD patients, the role of food allergens as an exacerbating factor for AD is controversial. Before starting any dietary modifications, careful evaluation should be performed by an allergist. If the patient is not well-controlled despite adequate topical therapies or is experiencing severe/worsening disease, early referral to dermatology is warranted to rule out confounding diagnoses and/or escalation to systemic therapies. Finally, it is important to recognise the racial disparities present in AD and address these when formulating treatment plans.Key messages:Confounding dermatoses, either instead of or in addition to AD, should be considered in treatment-refractory AD, and the appropriate workup may be initiated while awaiting dermatology referral.AD patients have multiple cutaneous and extra-cutaneous comorbidities that warrant screening by internists, especially mental health conditions.

Effects of Pain From Atopic Dermatitis: Interview and Focus Group Study With Patients and Their Families

BACKGROUND

Pain is an underappreciated symptom of atopic dermatitis that can affect the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to understand the effect of pain on patients with atopic dermatitis and their family members and to recognize how this symptom affects HRQL.

METHODS

We conducted focus groups and interviews with patients with atopic dermatitis and their family members. Researchers independently coded the transcripts and reached a consensus on the major themes.

RESULTS

A total of 33 adult participants, consisting of 21 patients with atopic dermatitis (median age 47 years, range 22-77) and 12 family members (median age 50, range 22-72), attended either focus groups (23/33, 70%) or interviews (10/33, 30%), where we assessed their experiences of pain. Four themes emerged in our study. Itchiness and pain can be intertwined: pain was often caused by or otherwise associated with itchiness and could result from open sores and excoriated skin. Characteristics of pain: pain was most often described as burning. Other descriptors included mild, persistent discomfort; stinging; and stabbing. Effects of pain: pain negatively affected various aspects of daily life, including choice of clothing, sleep, social activities, and relationships. The location of painful areas could also limit physical activity, including sex. Pain management: pain from atopic dermatitis could be managed to varying degrees with different over-the-counter and prescription treatments. Systemic agents that cleared the skin also resolved the pain associated with atopic dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain can be a significant factor in the HRQL of patients with atopic dermatitis and should be considered by clinicians when caring for patients with atopic dermatitis.

Dupilumab Significantly Modulates Pain and Discomfort in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 5 Randomized Clinical Trials

Background

Pain is a frequent symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD).

Objectives

The aims of the study were to evaluate the effects of dupilumab on pain/discomfort in AD and to determine whether pain correlates with other outcomes.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of 5 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials in which adults with chronic AD received placebo or dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or once weekly with and without topical corticosteroids. Proportions of patients with no pain/discomfort on this dimension of the 5-dimension EuroQoL (EQ-5D) at week 16 (all trials) and week 52 (CHRONOS) were compared between placebo and dupilumab. Correlations were evaluated between pain/discomfort and signs and symptoms of AD.

Results

Among 2632 evaluated patients, 72.9% to 83.1% reported at least moderate pain/discomfort at baseline. Higher proportions treated with dupilumab reported no pain/discomfort at week 16 relative to placebo; risk differences ranged from 22.3% (95% confidence interval = 11.5%–33.1%) to 42.2% (95% confidence interval = 26.6%–57.8%, all P ≤ 0.0001), with similar effects observed at week 52. Correlations at baseline of pain/discomfort with signs and symptoms of AD were low to moderate.

Conclusions

Pain/discomfort, present in a substantial proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe AD, was significantly reduced by dupilumab treatment. Given the low-to-moderate correlations with other AD symptoms at baseline, pain likely represents a distinct AD symptom.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01859988, NCT02277743, NCT02277769, NCT02260986, and NCT02755649.

Baricitinib Rapidly Improves Skin Pain Resulting in Improved Quality of Life for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Analyses from BREEZE-AD1, 2, and 7

Introduction

Skin pain (described as discomfort or soreness) is increasingly recognized as a symptom of atopic dermatitis which impacts patient quality of life. This analysis examined the effect of baricitinib on skin pain in atopic dermatitis in three phase 3 studies (BREEZE-AD1, -AD2, and -AD7).

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1:1:1 to receive once-daily placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg in BREEZE-AD1 (N = 624) and -AD2 (N = 615) and 1:1:1 to receive once-daily placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, or 4 mg, with topical corticosteroids, in BREEZE-AD7 (N = 329) for 16 weeks. Patients recorded their skin pain severity using the Skin Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) via an electronic daily diary. Data were analyzed by study as least squares mean change from baseline in daily scores for the randomly assigned patients using mixed model repeated measures analysis. Analysis of Skin Pain NRS response was done using logistic regression using non-responder imputation.

Results

Baricitinib produced significant percentage change from baseline compared with placebo in patient-reported skin pain severity by day 2 in BREEZE-AD1 (baricitinib 4 mg − 11.9%, p < 0.001; baricitinib 2 mg − 6.4%, p = 0.016; baricitinib 1 mg − 6.2%, p = 0.016), -AD2 (baricitinib 4 mg − 12.6%, p < 0.001; baricitinib 2 mg − 5.6%, p = 0.036; baricitinib 1 mg − 6.9%, p = 0.011), and -AD7 (baricitinib 4 mg − 6.9%, p = 0.04; baricitinib 2 mg − 7.9%, p = 0.018). A greater proportion of patients treated with baricitinib reported at least a 4-point reduction in Skin Pain NRS score at week 16 (Skin Pain NRS responders) in BREEZE-AD1 (baricitinib 4 mg 25.3%, p < 0.001), -AD2 (baricitinib 4 mg 20.0%, p < 0.001; baricitinib 2 mg 19.0%, p < 0.001), and -AD7 (baricitinib 4 mg 48.8%, p < 0.001; baricitinib 2 mg 45.2%, p = 0.004) compared to placebo. A significantly higher proportion of Skin Pain NRS responders also achieved at least a 4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index at week 16 when compared with Skin Pain NRS non-responders in BREEZE-AD1 (89.2%, p < 0.0001), -AD2 (92.5%, p < 0.0001), and -AD7 (88.3%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Baricitinib improved patient-reported skin pain severity as early as day 2.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers

BREEZE-AD1, NCT03334396; BREEZE-AD2, NCT03334422; BREEZE-AD7, NCT03733301.

Role of reactive astrocytes in the spinal dorsal horn under chronic itch conditions

Astrocytes are the most abundant glial cells in the central nervous system (CNS), including the spinal cord. Neuronal damage induces astrocytes to become reactive and contribute to various CNS pathologies. Recent studies have demonstrated that astrocytes in the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) become reactive in a transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-dependent manner without neuronal damage under chronic itch conditions, causing release of the factor lipocalin-2, leading to induction of sensitization of gastrin releasing peptide-induced chemical itch signaling in the SDH. In this review, we describe recent advances in our understanding of SDH neuronal pathways for itch transmission, the mechanisms of SDH astrocytic activation and its contribution to abnormal itch processing and discuss the role of reactive astrocytes in the SDH in abnormal sensory processing under chronic itch conditions.

Pearls in Mitigating Application Pain of Topical Nonsteroidal Agents

BACKGROUND

Topical steroid-sparing agents (SSA), such as tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and crisaborole, represent an important therapeutic option in the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis. While these agents lack the common side effects associated with topical corticosteroids, they all share application site pain as an important adverse effect.

SUMMARY

Based on the available evidence and our experience, we suggest the following 7 practical strategies for decreasing the pain associated with SSA use. (1) Use a topical corticosteroid for a few days to reduce inflammation before starting the SSA treatment. (2) Use SSAs strategically. (3) Apply moisturizer before applying SSAs. (4) Store moisturizers in the refrigerator. (5) Ask the patient to apply the SSA on a small test area before broader application. (6) Apply the SSA on dry rather than on damp skin. (7) Consider using aspirin when appropriate for the patient.