Renal effects of added low-dose dopamine in acute heart failure patients with diuretic resistance to natriuretic peptide

Neurohormonal Effects of Intravenous Dopamine in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Background/Objectives: Many clinical trials have shown beneficial effects of low-dose dopamine on renal function, diuresis and symptom relief, or cardiac function in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF). The aim is to assess the neurohormonal effects and the effects on clinical outcomes of the addition of low-dose dopamine in furosemide treatment in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF. Methods: A total of 62 patients hospitalized for acute decompensation of HF, were randomly allocated to one of the following three groups: i. LDF (low-dose furosemide), ii. HDF (high-dose furosemide) and, iii. LDFD (low-dose furosemide and dopamine). Primary outcomes of the present analysis were biochemical and neurohormonal indices (i.e., urea, creatinine, hemoglobin, electrolytes, natriuretic peptides, troponin, renin, angiotensin, aldosterone, adrenaline, noradrenaline). Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes (i.e., length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 2-month mortality and rehospitalization, and 1-year mortality and rehospitalization). Results: Urea and creatinine levels were similar for each day among the three groups (p > 0.05). The amount of urine was similar among the three groups per measurement at 2, 4, 6 and at 8 h (p > 0.05). Biochemical and neurohormonal indices as well as clinical outcomes did not differ among patients receiving different doses of furosemide, nor in patients receiving furosemide in combination with dopamine (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Although the addition of low-dose dopamine to intravenous furosemide was considered to have some theoretical advantages in maintaining renal function, no significant differences in neurohormonal effects and clinical outcomes were observed in patients hospitalized for acute decompensation of HF.

Comprehensive Comparison of the Effect of Inotropes on Cardiorenal Syndrome in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Prevention of cardiorenal syndrome through treatment with inotropic agents remains challenging. This network meta-analysis evaluated the safety and renoprotective effects of inotropes on patients with advanced heart failure (HF) using a frequentist random-effects model. A systematic database search was performed until 31 January 2021, and a total of 37 trials were included. Inconsistency, publication bias, and subgroup analyses were conducted. The levosimendan group exhibited significantly decreased mortality compared with the control (odds ratio (OR): 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.84), milrinone (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30-0.84), and dobutamine (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) groups. In terms of renal protection, levosimendan (standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.67; 95% CI: 1.17-2.18) and dobutamine (SMD: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.87-2.12) more favorably improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than the control treatment did, but they did not significantly reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury. Furthermore, levosimendan had the highest P-score, indicating that it most effectively reduced mortality and improved renal function (e.g., GFR and serum creatinine level), even in patients with renal insufficiency. In conclusion, levosimendan is a safe alternative for protecting renal function on cardiorenal syndrome in patients with advanced HF.

Predictors of responders for low-dose carperitide monotherapy in patients with acute heart failure

Human atrial natriuretic peptide, known as carperitide, is approved for early relief of dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). However, the diuretic effect of carperitide is sometimes insufficient for controlling volume overload. We investigated predictors for the carperitide response in patients with AHF. Forty-seven patients (age: 74 ± 10 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 42.0% ± 15.9%) with AHF were enrolled and treated with carperitide monotherapy at a dose of 0.0125 μg/kg/min. Patients without sufficient diuresis (< 60 ml/h) or improvement of symptoms by 4 h after carperitide administration, despite increasing to twice the dose of carperitide and adding another agent, were defined as non-responders. Twenty-four (51%) patients were defined as responders and treated with low-dose carperitide monotherapy on the first day. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the response to carperitide monotherapy was independently predicted by serum creatinine levels and systolic blood pressure (SBP) on admission. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for predicting the response to carperitide by SBP was 0.808 (95% confidence interval [0.686-0.930], sensitivity: 83.3%, specificity: 65.2%, cutoff value: 135 mmHg). Four (8.5%) patients developed asymptomatic transient hypotension. Worsening renal function occurred within 3 days of admission in three (6.4%) patients who received low-dose carperitide therapy. SBP and serum creatinine levels on admission might be useful for predicting the diuretic response to low-dose carperitide monotherapy in patients with AHF. Initial use of low-dose carperitide therapy does not have adverse effects on renal function.

Dopamine in critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background

Dopamine has been used in patients with cardiac dysfunction for more than five decades. Yet, no systematic review has assessed the effects of dopamine in critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted following The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We searched for trials including patients with observed cardiac dysfunction published until 19 April 2018. Risk of bias was evaluated and Trial Sequential Analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and renal replacement therapy. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Results

We identified 17 trials randomising 1218 participants. All trials were at high risk of bias and only one trial used placebo. Dopamine compared with any control treatment was not significantly associated with relative risk of mortality (60/457 [13%] vs 90/581 [15%]; RR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.68‐1.21) or any other patient‐centred outcomes. Trial Sequential Analyses of all outcomes showed that there was insufficient information to confirm or reject our anticipated intervention effects. There were also no statistically significant associations for any of the outcomes in subgroup analyses by type of comparator (inactive compared to potentially active), dopamine dose (low compared to moderate dose), or setting (cardiac surgery compared to heart failure).

Conclusion

Evidence for dopamine in critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction is sparse, of low quality, and inconclusive. The use of dopamine for cardiac dysfunction can neither be recommended nor refuted.

Scaffold Repurposing of Nucleosides (Adenosine Receptor Agonists): Enhanced Activity at the Human Dopamine and Norepinephrine Sodium Symporters

We have repurposed (N)-methanocarba adenosine derivatives (A3 adenosine receptor (AR) agonists) to enhance radioligand binding allosterically at the human dopamine (DA) transporter (DAT) and inhibit DA uptake. We extended the structure-activity relationship of this series with small N6-alkyl substitution, 5'-esters, deaza modifications of adenine, and ribose restored in place of methanocarba. C2-(5-Halothien-2-yl)-ethynyl 5'-methyl 9 (MRS7292) and 5'-ethyl 10 (MRS7232) esters enhanced binding at DAT (EC50 ∼ 35 nM) and at the norepinephrine transporter (NET). 9 and 10 were selective for DAT compared to A3AR in the mouse but not in humans. At DAT, the binding of two structurally dissimilar radioligands was enhanced; NET binding of only one radioligand was enhanced; SERT radioligand binding was minimally affected. 10 was more potent than cocaine at inhibiting DA uptake (IC50 = 107 nM). Ribose analogues were weaker in DAT interaction than the corresponding bicyclics. Thus, we enhanced the neurotransmitter transporter activity of rigid nucleosides while reducing A3AR affinity.

A meta-analysis of low-dose dopamine in heart failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a major health problem worldwide with no proven therapy. Low-dose dopamine (LDD) has been applied to patients with HF to enhance diuresis and preserve renal function since the last century. However, the efficacy of LDD in HF has been questioned by several studies recently. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to appraise the effects of the LDD to HF.

METHODS

Relative trials were identified in the PubMed, The Web of Science, OVID EBM Reviews and Cochrane databases, and the relevant papers were examined. Pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by random effects models. The primary endpoints in our meta-analysis were renal function, determined by blood urea, creatinine levels, eGFR and urine output. Secondary endpoints were rates of all-cause mortality and readmission after treatment.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective study involving 587 patients were included in this analysis. LDD enhanced eGFR (MD, 7.44; 95% CI, 1.92-12.95; P=0.008), urine output (SMD, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.15-1.01; P=0.008) and decrease creatinine levels (MD, -0.36; 95% CI, -0.64/-0.08; P=0.004), blood urea (MD, -6.97; 95% CI, -13.12/-0.81; P=0.03). No statistically significant differences in the rates of mortality (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.62-1.20, P=0.37) and readmission (RR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.47-1.56, P=0.62) were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

LDD indeed brought benefits in terms of promoting diuresis and preserving renal function for HF patients. It did not demonstrate statistical significance in rates of readmission nor mortality. The efficacy of LDD to HF patients should be confirmed by further large, high quality clinical trials.