Quantitative Analysis of 26 Opioids, Cocaine, and Their Metabolites in Human Blood by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Label-free, real-time monitoring of membrane binding events at zeptomolar concentrations using frequency-locked optical microresonators

G-protein coupled receptors help regulate cellular function and communication, and are targets of small molecule drug discovery efforts. Conventional techniques to probe these interactions require labels and large amounts of receptor to achieve satisfactory sensitivity. Here, we use frequency-locked optical microtoroids for label-free characterization of membrane interactions in vitro at zeptomolar concentrations for the kappa opioid receptor and its native agonist dynorphin A 1-13, as well as big dynorphin (dynorphin A and dynorphin B) using a supported biomimetic membrane. The measured affinity of the agonist dynorphin A 1-13 to the κ-opioid receptor was also measured and found to be 3.1 nM. Radioligand assays revealed a dissociation constant in agreement with this value (1.1 nM). The limit of detection for the κOR/DynA 1-13 was calculated as 180 zM. The binding of Cholera Toxin B-monosialotetrahexosyl ganglioside was also monitored in real-time and an equilibrium dissociation constant of 1.53 nM was found. Our biosensing platform provides a method for highly sensitive real-time characterization of membrane embedded protein binding kinetics that is rapid and label-free, for drug discovery and toxin screening among other applications.

Exploiting the power of UPLC in separation and simultaneous determination of pholcodine, guaiacol along with three specified guaiacol impurities

Pholcodine and guaiacol are widely used together in pharmaceutical syrups for cough treatment. On the other hand, the Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatographic technique is characterized by having the power of increasing chromatographic efficiency and decreasing run time compared to the traditional High Performance Liquid Chromatographic one. In this work, this power was exploited for the simultaneous determination of pholcodine, guaiacol along with three guaiacol impurities, namely; guaiacol impurity A, guaiacol impurity B, and guaiacol impurity E. Good separation was achieved by employing Agilent Zorbax C8 column (50 × 2.1 mm) as the stationary phase, and acetonitrile: phosphate buffer pH 3.5 (40: 60, by volume) as a mobile phase. The proposed method was validated as per International Council for Harmonisation guidelines. Linear relationships, at ranges of 50-1000 µg mL^-1 for pholcodine and 5-100 µg mL^-1 for guaiacol and the three related impurities, were established. Finally, the proposed method was applied for pholcodine and guaiacol determination in Coughpent® syrup and compared favorably to the reported one.

Development and validation of a fast UPLC-MS/MS screening method for the detection of 68 psychoactive drugs and metabolites in whole blood and application to post-mortem cases

We report a rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS method that allows the simultaneous detection of 68 commonly prescribed antidepressants, benzodiazepines, neuroleptics, and metabolites in whole blood with a small sample volume after a rapid protein precipitation. The method was also tested on post-mortem blood from 85 forensic autopsies. Three sets of commercial serum calibrators containing a mix of prescription drugs of increasing concentration were spiked with red blood cells (RBC) to obtain 6 calibrators (3 "serum calibrators" and 3 "blood calibrators"). Curves obtained from serum calibrators and from blood calibrators were compared using a Spearman correlation test and by analyzing slopes and intercepts, to assess if the points from six calibrators could be plotted together in a single calibration model. The validation plan included interference studies, calibration model, carry-over, bias, within-run and between-run precision, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), matrix effect and dilution integrity. Four deuterated Internal Standards (Nordiazepam-D5, Citalopram-D6, Ketamine-D4 and Amphetamine-D5) and two different dilutions were assessed. Analyses were performed using an Acquity UPLC® System coupled with triple quadrupole detector Xevo TQD®. The degree of agreement with a previously validated method was calculated on whole blood samples of 85 post-mortem cases, by performing a Spearman correlation test with a Bland-Altman plot. Percentage error between the two methods was evaluated. Slopes and intercepts of curves obtained from serum calibrators and from blood calibrators showed a good correlation, and the calibration model was built plotting all points together. No interferences were found. The calibration curve appeared to provide a better fit of the data using an unweighted linear model. Negligible carry-over was observed, and very good linearity, precision, bias, matrix effect and dilution integrity were achieved. The LOD and the LOQ were at the lower limits of the therapeutic range for the tested drugs. In a series of 85 forensic cases, 11 antidepressants, 11 benzodiazepines and 8 neuroleptics were detected. For all analytes, a very good agreement between the new method and the validated method was demonstrated. The innovation of our method consists in the use of commercial calibrators, readily available to most forensic toxicology laboratories, for the validation of a fast, inexpensive, wide-panel LC-MS/MS method that can be used as a reliable and accurate screening for psychotropic drug in postmortem samples. As observed in the implementation on real cases, this method could be profitably applied in forensic cases.

Combined Use of Flubromazepam and Stimulants: Blood and Oral Fluid Concentrations and Impact on Driving Ability

"Designer" benzodiazepines (DBZDs) are becoming increasingly available in Europe, with the European Monitoring Centre of Drugs and Drug Addiction currently monitoring ∼30 new benzodiazepines. The following driving under the influence of drug (DUID) case describes the oral fluid (OF) and blood concentrations, as well as the observed effects after the combined use of stimulants and flubromazepam. Both OF, collected via the Intercept i2 collector (Immunalysis, Pomona, CA, USA), and blood (collected in containers with various stabilizers) were screened using a liquid chromatographic (LC) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometric (MS-MS) method. In addition, various LC-MS-MS methods in multi-reaction monitoring mode were applied for confirmation and quantification. The OF and blood samples were taken 2 h 25 min and 9 h 19 min after the accident, respectively. OF contained 789 ng/mL amphetamine, 5,173 ng/mL MDMA, 168 ng/mL benzoylecgonine, 492 ng/mL cocaine, 134 ng/mL 4-methylmethcathinone (4-MMC) and traces of flubromazepam (less than limit of quantification (LLOQ); 2 ng/mL). The sodium-fluoride blood samples contained 19 ng/mL amphetamine, 284 ng/mL MDMA, 20 ng/mL MDA, 38 ng/mL benzoylecgonine, 4 ng/mL methylecgonine, 161 ng/mL flubromazepam and traces of 4-MMC (<LLOQ; 2.5 ng/mL). The driver was observed to have an irregular speed driving pattern and could not keep his lane. He demonstrated the following effects after the accident: bloodshot eyes, red face, sweating, fatigue, disorientation in time and space and mental confusion. Even 24 h after the accident, the driver was confused, disoriented, had red spots on his face and could not keep his balance. The effects of flubromazepam combined with several stimulants are demonstrated. Moreover, this case illustrates well the pros and cons of the different biological matrices applied in a DUID context. Differences between the biological matrices are not only observed concerning the ease/practicality of (on-site) collection, but also in the final drug detectability due to the large variations in OF/blood drug concentration ratios and metabolism/elimination rates as a result of the different chemical entities of the compounds.

A Single Method for 127 Recommended and Additional DUID Drugs in Blood and Urine by LC-MS/MS

Driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) cases continue to challenge forensic toxicologists as both the volume and complexity of casework increases. Comprehensive DUID testing should also meet the drafted ASB/ANSI standard and the NSC-ADID recommendations. A simple method using protein precipitation followed by filtration extraction with an 8-minute run time by LC-MS/MS was developed, and a comprehensive ASB/ANSI validation performed. Assessed in blood quantitatively, and urine qualitatively, is 127 target drug and metabolite analytes including cannabinoids (12), amphetamines (11), cocaine and metabolites (6), benzodiazepines (36), Z-drugs (5), opioids (27), anticonvulsants (3), first-generation antihistamines (6), muscle relaxants (2), dissociatives and hallucinogens (6), barbiturates (10), and miscellaneous substances (3). Limits of detection are appropriate for DUID, and other forensic casework such as drug-facilitated crime (DFC) and postmortem investigations. To demonstrate applicability, 78 proficiency test blood and urine samples, and 1,645 blood and urine samples from authentic cases samples demonstrated effective detection of target analytes in forensic casework. By increasing the analytical scope of multiple drug classes via a single method, this technique detects drugs that may have previously gone undetected, such as flualprazolam, etizolam, mitragynine, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, and psilocin, and improves laboratory efficiency by reducing the number of tests required. The described method is, to the authors' best knowledge, the only published single procedure to meet all drugs listed in the drafted ASB/ANSI standard, and recommended Tier 1 and traditional drugs from Tier 2 for DUID screening, whilst also achieving many drugs recommended for DFC and postmortem testing.

Simultaneous LC-MS/MS quantification of oxycodone, tramadol and fentanyl and their metabolites (noroxycodone, oxymorphone, O- desmethyltramadol, N- desmethyltramadol, and norfentanyl) in human plasma and whole blood collected via venepuncture and volumetric absorptive micro sampling

INTRODUCTION

A range of opioids are commonly prescribed to manage chronic pain, but individual patient responses vary greatly, especially in older populations. One source of that variability are differences in absorption, metabolism and excretion, i.e. pharmacokinetics. Blood, plasma and serum concentrations of opioids allow that variability to be quantified and may be used to optimise opioid dosing. As an aid to that process, there is an unmet need to rapidly quantify several opioids and their metabolites in a single analytical method.

AIMS

To develop a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous quantification of tramadol, oxycodone, fentanyl and their major metabolites in various human matrices.

METHODS

Sample preparation involved adding three deuterated internal standards followed by protein precipitation with 100 % acetonitrile, evaporation and reconstitution. Separation of analytes via LC was achieved on a reversed phase column via binary gradient elution using 0.005 % formic acid in water and 100 % acetonitrile as mobile phases. Analytes were detected via MS/MS with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM).

RESULTS

The method was accurate with the inter-day and intra-day accuracy of quality control samples (QCs) below 15 %. It was also precise with inter-day and intra-day coefficient of variation below 15 %. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.2 ng/mL for all analytes except tramadol and its metabolites, where the LLOQ was 10 ng/mL. Recovery was greater than 88 % for all analytes, except for O-desmethyltramadol (81 %). Analytes were stable over four freeze-thaw cycles, for 24 h on the bench top and for 24 h post-preparation. The inter- and intra-day variability of concentrations determined in blood and plasma were within 84-124%, whereas the inter- and intra-day variability for blood samples prepared using volumetric absorptive micro-sampling (VAMS) compared to those prepared from whole blood ranged between 83-122%.

CONCLUSION

A LC-MS/MS method is described that is able to accurately and precisely quantify a number of commonly prescribed opioids and their major metabolites in plasma and whole blood, including whole blood collected using VAMS.

The Interest of a Systematic Toxicological Analysis Combined with Forensic Advice to Improve the Judicial Investigation and Final Judgment in Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault Cases

The conviction rate in drug facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) cases is known to be very low. In addition, the potential impact of toxicological results on the case is often not well understood by the judicial authorities. The aims of this study were (1) to obtain more knowledge concerning the prevalence of incapacitating substances in DFSA cases, (2) to create a more efficient DFSA analysis strategy taking background information into account, and (3) to evaluate the potential impact of systematic toxicological analysis (STA) on the final judicial outcome. This small-scale epidemiological study (n = 79) demonstrates that ‘commonly-used’ illicit drugs, psychoactive medicines and ethanol are more prevalent in DFSA cases in contrast to the highly mediatized date rape drugs. Additionally, via case examples, the interest of performing STA—to prove incapacitation of the victim—in judicial procedures with mutual-consent discussions has been demonstrated as it led to increased convictions. However, more attention has to be paid to ensure a short sampling delay and to get more accurate information from the medical treatment of the alleged victim. This will improve the interpretation of the toxicological analysis and thus its applicability in a DFSA case. The future is multi-disciplinary and will certainly lead to an efficient and more cost-effective DFSA approach in which STA can impact the final judgment.

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs: A Single Parallel Monitoring-Based Quantification Approach on Whole Blood

Driving under the influence of psychoactive substances is a major cause of motor vehicle crashes. The identification and quantification of substances most frequently involved in impaired-driving cases in a single analytic procedure could be an important asset in forensic toxicology. In this study, a highly sensitive and selective liquid chromatography (LC) approach hyphenated with Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was developed for the quantification of the main drugs present in the context of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) using 100 μL of whole blood. This procedure involves a simple sample preparation and benefit from the selectivity brought by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) allowing to solve most DUID cases using a single multi-analyte injection. The method was fully validated for the quantification of the major classes of psychoactive substances associated with impaired-driving (cannabinoids, cocaine and its metabolites, amphetamines, opiates and opioids, and the major benzodiazepines and z-drugs). The validation guidelines set by the “Société Française des Sciences et des Techniques Pharmaceutiques” (SFSTP) were respected for 22 psychoactive substances using 15 internal standards. Trueness was measured to be between 95.3 and 107.6% for all the tested concentrations. Precision represented by repeatability and intermediate precision was lower than 12% while recovery (RE) and matrix effect (ME) ranged from 49 to 105% and from −51 to 3%, respectively. The validated procedure provides an efficient approach for the simultaneous and simple quantification of the major drugs associated with impaired driving benefiting from the selectivity of PRM.

Quantification of methadone, buprenorphine, naloxone, opioids, and their derivates in whole blood by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry: Analysis of their involvement in fatal forensic cases

Opioids represent a broad family of compounds that can be used in several indications: analgesics, antitussives, opioid substitution therapy (e.g. methadone, buprenorphine…). When these products are misused, they are often addictive. Thus, we aimed to develop an analytical method able to rapidly quantify several opiates and opioids (6-monoacetylmorphine, buprenorphine, codeine, dihydrocodeine, 2-ethyl-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, ethylmorphine, heroin, methadone, morphine, nalbuphine, naloxone, norbuprenorphine, norcodeine, norpropoxyphene, oxycodone and propoxyphene) in whole blood by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography combined with high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). The validated assay requires only 100 µL of the blood sample. The sample is prepared by a rapid liquid-liquid extraction using 5% zinc sulfate (W/V), methanol and acetonitrile. Calibration curves range from 0.98 to 1000 µg/L, except for buprenorphine (0.39-100 µg/L) and norbuprenorphine (0.20-100 µg/L). Inter- and intra-analytical accuracy was less than 15%. Therefore, we describe the development and full validation of an accurate, sensitive and precise assay using UHPLC-HRMS for the analysis of opioids in whole blood. After validation, this new assay is successfully applied on a routine laboratory application basis.

Determination of morphine and its metabolites in the biological samples: an updated review

Morphine (MO) as an opioid analgesic is used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pains, particularly cancer-related pains. Pharmacologic studies on MO are complicated due to drugs binding to the protein or metabolization to active metabolites, and even inter-individual variability. This necessitates the selection of a reliable analytical method for monitoring MO and the concentrations of its metabolites in the biological samples for the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic investigations. Therefore, this study was conducted to review all the analytical research carried out on MO and its metabolites in the biological samples during 2007-2019 as an update to the study by Bosch et al. (2007).

Simultaneous quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, cefazolin, doxapram and keto-doxapram in plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

A simple and specific UPLC–MS/MS method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, cefazolin, doxapram and its active metabolite keto‐doxapram. The internal standard was fentanyl‐d5 for all analytes. Chromatographic separation was achieved with a reversed‐phase Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column with a run‐time of only 5.0 min per injected sample. Gradient elution was performed with a mobile phase consisting of ammonium acetate or formic acid in Milli‐Q ultrapure water or in methanol with a total flow rate of 0.4 mL min⁻¹. A plasma volume of only 50 μL was required to achieve adequate accuracy and precision. Calibration curves of all five analytes were linear. All analytes were stable for at least 48 h in the autosampler. The method was validated according to US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. This method allows quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, cefazolin, doxapram and keto‐doxapram, which is useful for research as well as therapeutic drug monitoring, if applicable. The strength of this method is the combination of a small sample volume, a short run‐time, a deuterated internal standard, an easy sample preparation method and the ability to simultaneously quantify all analytes in one run.

Activity-Based Detection of Cannabinoids in Serum and Plasma Samples

BACKGROUND

Synthetic cannabinoids are the largest group of new psychoactive substances monitored by the European Monitoring Centre of Drugs and Drug Addiction. The rapid proliferation of novel analogs makes the detection of these new derivatives challenging and has initiated considerable interest in the development of so-called “untargeted” screening strategies to detect these compounds.

METHODS

We developed new, stable bioassays in which cannabinoid receptor activation by cannabinoids led to recruitment of truncated β-arrestin 2 (βarr2) to the cannabinoid receptors, resulting in functional complementation of a split luciferase, allowing readout via bioluminescence. Aliquots (500 μL) of authentic serum (n = 45) and plasma (n = 73) samples were used for simple liquid–liquid extraction with hexane:ethyl acetate (99:1 v/v). Following evaporation and reconstitution in 100 μL of Opti-MEM® I/methanol (50/50 v/v), 10 μL of these extracts was analyzed in the bioassays.

RESULTS

Truncation of βarr2 significantly (for both cannabinoid receptors; P = 0.0034 and 0.0427) improved the analytical sensitivity over the previously published bioassays applied on urine samples. The new bioassays detected cannabinoid receptor activation by authentic serum or plasma extracts, in which synthetic cannabinoids were present at low- or sub-nanogram per milliliter concentration or in which Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol was present at concentrations &gt;12 ng/mL. For synthetic cannabinoid detection, analytical sensitivity was 82%, with an analytical specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bioassays have the potential to serve as a first-line screening tool for (synthetic) cannabinoid activity in serum or plasma and may complement conventional analytical assays and/or precede analytical (mass spectrometry based) confirmation.

Medical Emergencies Related to Ethanol and Illicit Drugs at an Annual, Nocturnal, Indoor, Electronic Dance Music Event

Introduction Medical problems are frequently encountered during electronic dance music (EDM) events. Problem There are uncertainties about the frequencies and severity of intoxications with different types of recreational drugs: ethanol, "classical" illicit party drugs, and new psychoactive substances (NPS).

METHODS

Statistical data on the medical problems encountered during two editions of an indoor electronic dance event with around 30,000 attendants were retrieved from the Belgian Red Cross (Mechelen, Belgium) database. Data on drug use were prospectively collected from the patient (or a bystander), the clinical presentation, and/or toxicological screening.

RESULTS

In the on-site medical station, 487 patients were treated (265 in 2013 and 222 in 2014). The most frequent reasons were trauma (n=171), headache (n=36), gastro-intestinal problems (n=44), and intoxication (n=160). Sixty-nine patients were transferred to a hospital, including 53 with severe drug-related symptoms. Analysis of blood samples from 106 intoxicated patients detected ethanol in 91.5%, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in 34.0%, cannabis in 30.2%, cocaine in 7.5%, amphetamine in 2.8%, and gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) in 0.9% of patients (alone or in combination). In only six of the MDMA-positive cases, MDMA was the sole substance found. In 2014, the neuroleptic drug clozapine was found in three cases and ketamine in one. Additional analyses for NPS were performed in 20 cases. Only in one agitated patient, the psychedelic phenethylamines 25B-NBOMe and 25C-NBOMe were found.

CONCLUSIONS

At this particular event, recreational drug abuse necessitated on-site medical treatment in one out of 350 attendants and a hospital transfer in one out of 1,000. Ethanol remains the most frequently abused (legal) drug, yet classical illicit recreational drugs are also frequently (co-) ingested. The most worrying observation was high-risk poly-drug use, especially among MDMA users. Regarding NPS, the number of cases was low and the clinical presentations were rather mild. It should be stressed that these observations only apply to this particular event and cannot be generalized to other EDM events. Calle P , Sundahl N , Maudens K , Wille SMR , Van Sassenbroeck D , De Graeve K , Gogaert S , De Paepe P , Devriese D , Arno G , Blanckaert P . Medical emergencies related to ethanol and illicit drugs at an annual, nocturnal, indoor, electronic dance music event. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):71-76.

Simultaneous quantitation of meperidine, normeperidine, tramadol, propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in human plasma using solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: Method validation and application to cardiovascular safety of therapeutic doses

RATIONALE

Several opioid analgesics have been related to the prolongation of cardiac repolarization, a condition which can be fatal. In order to establish a correct estimation of the risk/benefit balance of therapeutic doses of meperidine, normeperidine, tramadol, propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene, it was necessary to develop an analytical method to determinate plasma concentrations of these opioids.

METHODS

Here we describe a method which incorporates strong alkaline treatment to obtain norpropoxyphene amide followed by a one-elution step solid-phase extraction, and without further derivatization. Separation and quantification were achieved by gas chromatography/electron ionization mass spectrometry (GC/EI-MS) in selected-ion monitoring mode. Quantification was performed with 500 μL of plasma by the addition of deuterated analogues as internal standards.

RESULTS

The proposed method has been validated in the linearity range of 25-1000 ng/mL for all the analytes, with correlation coefficients higher than 0.990. The lower limit of quantification was 25 ng/mL. The intra- and inter-day precision, calculated in terms of relative standard deviation, were 2.0-12.0% and 6.0-15.0%, respectively. The accuracy, in terms of relative error, was within a ± 10% interval. The absolute recovery and extraction efficiency ranged from 81.0 to 111.0% and 81.0 to 105.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A GC/MS method for the rapid and simultaneous determination of meperidine, normeperidine, tramadol, propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in human plasma was developed, optimized and validated. This procedure was shown to be sensitive and specific using small specimen amounts, suitable for application in routine analysis for forensic purposes and therapeutic monitoring. To our knowledge, this is the first full validation of the simultaneous determination of these opioids and their metabolites in plasma samples.

Assessing cocaine abuse using LC-MS/MS measurements in biological specimens

Cocaine use is still a problem in today's world, and this has several implications on human activities. Indeed, important problems related to cocaine derive from its use in situations where concentration and focus skills are necessary, namely while driving and/or working. The need of analytical methods for drug analysis in specimens of biological origin for proper documentation of human exposure is increasing. While GC-MS-based procedures represented the state-of-the-art of analytical techniques a few years ago, there is a growing trend for their replacement by LC-MS/MS, which can be justified by the increased sensitivity presented by these new technologies. This paper will review recently published papers on the use of LC-MS/MS-based procedures for cocaine measurement in biological specimens.

Mass Spectrometry in Precision Medicine: Phenotypic Measurements Alongside Pharmacogenomics

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine is becoming a major topic within the medical community and is gaining traction as a standard approach in many disciplines. This approach typically revolves around the use of a patient's genetic makeup to allow the physician to choose the appropriate course of treatment. In many cases the genetic information directs the drug to be used to treat the patient. In other cases the genetic markers associated with enzyme function may inform dosage recommendations. However there is a second way in which precision medicine can be practiced—that is, by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

CONTENT

A review of the use of mass spectrometry for TDM in the arena of precision medicine is undertaken. Because the measurement of a drug or its metabolites provides the physician with a snapshot of the therapeutic exposure the patient is undergoing, these concentrations can be thought of as an actual phenotype measurement based around the patient's genetics coupled with all of the environmental, pharmacological, and nutritional variables. The outcome of a TDM measurement by mass spectrometry provides the patient's current phenotype vs the potential phenotype imputed by the genetics.

SUMMARY

The use of mass spectrometry can provide an understanding of how a drug is interacting with the patient, and is orthoganol to the information provided by pharmacogenomic assays. Further, the speed and relatively low expense of drug monitoring by mass spectrometry makes it an ideal test for precision medicine patient management.

Validation of a fast UPLC–MS/MS method for quantitative analysis of opioids, cocaine, amphetamines (and their derivatives) in human whole blood

Background: Conventional methods for analysis of drugs of abuse require multiple assays which can be both expensive and time-consuming. This work describes a novel, rapid, simple and sensitive method for the quantification of 14 illicit drugs and their metabolites in whole blood. Results/methodology: This method employed a rapid liquid–liquid sample extraction of whole blood followed by UPLC–MS/MS analysis. Calibration curves were validated for analysis of appropriate concentrations. Inter- and intra-assay variations were <14.8%. Deviation of accuracy was <14.9% from target concentration for each quality control level. Conclusion: This work described the development and the full validation of a precise, sensitive and accurate assay. After validation, this new assay was successfully applied to routine toxicological analysis.

Roadside drug testing: comparison of two legal approaches in Belgium

BACKGROUND

Internationally, urine on-site testing has been used for detecting drivers under the influence of drugs (DUID) but more and more countries, such as Belgium, are switching to oral fluid screening.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the previous (published in 1999) and current (published 2009) enforcement procedures of DUID in Belgium. The two evaluated procedures differ in the way the drivers are screened by the police (signs of impairment versus signs of recent drug use), the matrix for screening (urine versus oral fluid) and the analytical cut-off concentrations in plasma.

METHODS

Data on positive screening and confirmation results were gathered from 1st April 2008 to 30th September 2010, when urine screening (Dipro Druglab panels test) was performed; and from 1st October 2010 to 31st March 2013, when an on-site oral fluid test (Securetec Drugwipe 5(+)) was used.

RESULTS

Approximately 4100 data sets related to urine screening and 3900 data sets related to oral fluid screening were studied. Eighty-eight percent of positive urine on-site tests yielded positive results in plasma for cannabis, 21% for cocaine, 20% for amphetamines and 7% for opiates. Sixty-six percent of the positive oral fluid on-site tests yielded positive results in plasma for cannabis, 30% for cocaine, 28% for amphetamines and 8% for opiates. For cannabis, opiates and amphetamines more negative results in plasma were observed in the period of urine screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of plasma samples of tested drivers, in which none of the positive screened target drugs were present in a concentration above the legal cut-off value, has decreased from 17% to 8% since the introduction of the current legislation involving oral fluid screening.

Sample preparation with solid phase microextraction and exhaustive extraction approaches: Comparison for challenging cases

In chemical analysis, sample preparation is frequently considered the bottleneck of the entire analytical method. The success of the final method strongly depends on understanding the entire process of analysis of a particular type of analyte in a sample, namely: the physicochemical properties of the analytes (solubility, volatility, polarity etc.), the environmental conditions, and the matrix components of the sample. Various sample preparation strategies have been developed based on exhaustive or non-exhaustive extraction of analytes from matrices. Undoubtedly, amongst all sample preparation approaches, liquid extraction, including liquid-liquid (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE), are the most well-known, widely used, and commonly accepted methods by many international organizations and accredited laboratories. Both methods are well documented and there are many well defined procedures, which make them, at first sight, the methods of choice. However, many challenging tasks, such as complex matrix applications, on-site and in vivo applications, and determination of matrix-bound and free concentrations of analytes, are not easily attainable with these classical approaches for sample preparation. In the last two decades, the introduction of solid phase microextraction (SPME) has brought significant progress in the sample preparation area by facilitating on-site and in vivo applications, time weighted average (TWA) and instantaneous concentration determinations. Recently introduced matrix compatible coatings for SPME facilitate direct extraction from complex matrices and fill the gap in direct sampling from challenging matrices. Following introduction of SPME, numerous other microextraction approaches evolved to address limitations of the above mentioned techniques. There is not a single method that can be considered as a universal solution for sample preparation. This review aims to show the main advantages and limitations of the above mentioned sample preparation approaches and the applicability and capability of each technique for challenging cases such as complex matrices, on-site applications and automation.

Simultaneous determination of L-tetrahydropalmatine and cocaine in human plasma by simple UPLC-FLD method: application in clinical studies

Currently, there are no FDA approved medications for treatment of cocaine addiction underscoring the dire need to develop such a product. There is an accumulating body of evidence that l-tetrahydropalmatine (l-THP), a non-selective dopamine antagonist, can be used for the treatment of cocaine addiction. Indeed, the FDA recently approved its usage in a Phase I study in cocaine abusers and it was indispensable to develop a simple and sensitive method for the simultaneous determination of l-THP and cocaine in human plasma. We developed a UPLC-FLD method for quantitation of these molecules using an ACQUITY BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50mm, 1.7 μm) and a mobile phase that consisted of 10mM ammonium phosphate (pH=4.75), methanol, and acetonitrile (v:v:v, 78:16:6). Venlafaxine was used as the internal standard while hexane was used for the liquid-liquid extraction. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min with fluorescence detection using an excitation wavelength of 230 nm and emission detection wavelength of 315 nm. This method was selective, linear and sensitive with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL for both cocaine and l-THP. The intra-day precision of cocaine and l-THP was <9.50% while the accuracy was <4.29%. The inter-day precision of cocaine and l-THP was <9.14%, and the accuracy was <12.49%. The recovery for cocaine and l-THP ranged from 43.95 to 50.02% and 54.65 to 58.31%, respectively. In comparison to forty reported cocaine quantitation methods this method is simple, sensitive and cost-effective and can be used for simultaneous quantitation of l-THP and cocaine. This method meets the FDA guidelines and can be used in current and future clinical studies.