Political Advocacy from Plastic Surgery Trainees in the United States

Gender Gap? A Survey among Plastic Surgeons in Germany

INTRODUCTION

There is an ongoing increase in the percentage of females in the field of Plastic Surgery in Germany. Currently, 29,1% of fellows and 46% of residents in Germany are female. Several studies have pointed out the various obstacles that female doctors, especially female plastic surgeons, are confronted with in their professional life. The aim of this study is to examine gender parity among plastic surgeons in Germany. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the opinion of both women and men on gender-specific discrimination.

METHODS

In a nonrandomized, cross-sectional study an anonymous questionnaire covering various subjects such as education/training, career path, the compatibility of family and career, as well as the subjective perception of gender equality in Plastic Surgery was distributed among members of the German Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (DGPRÄC) as well as through social media. Data was collected with Google Docs.

RESULTS

The sample group (n = 285) composition was 162 female (56,8%), 122 (42,9%) male and 1 nonbinary (0,4%). The majority of women (54.3%) and men (49.1%) rated work-life balance as "difficult". In 82.1% of women and 44.3% of men, family planning was influenced by the profession. Most of the respondents work in hospitals (62.9% of women and 50.0% of men). The main motivation of 61.4% of women to go to in private practice was family reasons, 51.8% of men gave financial reasons. 64.1% of women and 54.1% of men have a doctoral degree, whereas 6.9% of women and 13.3% of the men have a postdoctoral degree. While 33.6% of the men believe that their own gender had no influence on their respective career decision, career progress or success, only 4.9% of women had the same opinion. In addition, 43.8% of women and 22.1% of men reported having experienced sexual harassment in their professional lives.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals significant gender differences in career development in Plastic Surgery. Family planning, motivations for establishment and academic careers, as well as the experience of sexual harassment, are of primary concern. Actively helping to shape the work environment of career development opportunities in light of this study may help to reduce gender disparities in Plastic Surgery in the future.

Political Priorities, Voting, and Political Action Committee Engagement of Emergency Medicine Trainees: A National Survey

INTRODUCTION

Medicine is increasingly influenced by politics, but physicians have historically had lower voter turnout than the general public. Turnout is even lower for younger voters. Little is known about the political interests, voting activity, or political action committee (PAC) involvement of emergency physicians in training. We evaluated EM trainees' political priorities, use of and barriers to voting, and engagement with an emergency medicine (EM) PAC.

METHODS

Resident/medical student Emergency Medicine Residents' Association members were emailed a survey between October-November 2018. Questions involved political priorities, perspective on single-payer healthcare, voting knowledge/behavior, and EM PACs participation. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Survey participants included 1,241 fully responding medical students and residents, with a calculated response rate of 20%. The top three healthcare priorities were as follows: 1) high cost of healthcare/price transparency; 2) decreasing the number of uninsured; and 3) quality of health insurance. The top EM-specific issue was ED crowding and boarding. Most trainees (70%) were supportive of single-payer healthcare: "somewhat favor" (36%) and "strongly favor" (34%). Trainees had high rates of voting in presidential elections (89%) but less frequent use of other voting options: 54% absentee ballots; 56% voting in state primary races; and 38% early voting. Over half (66%) missed voting in prior elections, with work cited as the most frequent (70%) barrier. While overall, half of respondents (62%) reported awareness of EM PACs, only 4% of respondents had contributed.

CONCLUSION

The high cost of healthcare was the top concern among EM trainees. Survey respondents had a high level of knowledge of absentee and early voting but less frequently used these options. Encouragement of early and absentee voting can improve voter turnout of EM trainees. Concerning EM PACs, there is significant room for membership growth. With improved knowledge of the political priorities of EM trainees, physician organizations and PACs can better engage future physicians.

The Role of Physician Advocacy in Achieving Health Equity: Where Is the Allergist-Immunologist?

As allergists and immunologists many of us have likely worked in the capacity of being an advocate for individual patients. However, how many of us are aware of our ability to be effective advocates who address root causes of health issues through policy changes? Physician advocacy is not a core competency medical specialty training (except pediatrics), yet physicians' clinical and research expertise and professional experience can be leveraged to shape policy. This rostrum describes the spectrum of activities for a physician advocate, barriers to physician advocacy, and actionable steps to encouraging the training and expansion of advocacy efforts by allergists and immunologists.

A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Political contributions from healthcare providers are essential to shaping healthcare policy and allow physicians to expand their influence on a national level. Political Action Committees in particular provide a useful avenue for unifying contributions for the interest of a specific community. This study examined the geographical distribution, temporal pattern, and overall nature of the political contributions made by plastic surgeons.

METHODS

The Federal Election Commission was analyzed for political contributions made by plastic surgeons from 2003 to 2021 using the search terms "plastic surgeon," "microsurgeon," and "craniofacial" as well as physician contributions to PlastyPAC. Contributions were categorized based on political parties (Democratic, Republican, and independent parties), and further analyzed based on state distribution and year of contribution. Spatial distribution data were then visualized using heatmaps for each state.

RESULTS

The total sum of contributions between 2003 and 2021 from plastic surgeons was $5,306,605, with $1,737,178.51 for the Republican party, $962,773.26 for the Democratic party, and $2,604,149.86 for independent parties. Political funding of PlastyPAC consisted of 47.3% of the overall political contributions. There was no significant trend through the years in the overall contribution amount. The states with the most political contributions were California, New York, Florida, and Texas.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal stagnation of total political contributions and decline in recent PlastyPAC funding from plastic surgeons support an increased political awareness for new plastic surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .