Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Follow-up Samples From Four Prospective Trials of the European MCL Network

Minimal residual disease detection in lymphoma: methods, procedures and clinical significance

Lymphoma is a highly heterogeneous lymphohematopoietic tumor. As our understanding of the biological and pathological characteristics of lymphoma improves, we are identifying an increasing number of lymphoma subtypes. Genotyping has enhanced our ability to diagnose, treat, and monitor the prognosis of lymphoma. Despite significant improvements in treatment effectiveness, traditional methods for assessing disease response and monitoring prognosis are imperfect, and there is no significant improvement in overall remission rates for lymphoma patients. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) is often indicative of refractory disease or early relapse. For lymphoma patients, personalized MRD monitoring techniques offer an efficient means to estimate disease remission levels, predict early relapse risk, and assess the effectiveness of new drug regimens. In this review, we delve into the MRD procedures in lymphoma, including sample selection and requirements, detection methods and their limitations and advantages, result interpretation. Besides, we also introduce the clinical applications of MRD detection in lymphoma.

Bendamustine and rituximab as first-line treatment for symptomatic splenic marginal zone lymphoma: long-term outcome and impact of early unmeasurable minimal residual disease attainment from the BRISMA/IELSG36 phase II study

Not available.

Analysis of measurable residual disease by IG/TR gene rearrangements: quality assurance and updated EuroMRD guidelines

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) diagnostics using real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements are nowadays implemented in most treatment protocols for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Within the EuroMRD Consortium, we aim to provide comparable, high-quality MRD diagnostics, allowing appropriate risk-group classification for patients and inter-protocol comparisons. To this end, we set up a quality assessment scheme, that was gradually optimized and updated over the last 20 years, and that now includes participants from around 70 laboratories worldwide. We here describe the design and analysis of our quality assessment scheme. In addition, we here report revised data interpretation guidelines, based on our newly generated data and extensive discussions between experts. The main novelty is the partial re-definition of the "positive below quantitative range" category by two new categories, "MRD low positive, below quantitative range" and "MRD of uncertain significance". The quality assessment program and revised guidelines will ensure reproducible and accurate MRD data for ALL patients. Within the Consortium, similar programs and guidelines have been introduced for other lymphoid diseases (e.g., B-cell lymphoma), for new technological platforms (e.g., digital droplet PCR or Next-Generation Sequencing), and for other patient-specific MRD PCR-based targets (e.g., fusion genes).

Noninvasive minimal residual disease assessment in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma using digital droplet PCR

Although several promising approaches for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) have been approved recently, it remains unclear which patients will ultimately achieve long-term responses. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA sequencing has emerged as a valuable tool to assess minimal residual disease (MRD). Correlations between MRD and outcomes have been shown in previously untreated DLBCL, but data on the repeated assessment of MRD in the dynamic course of rrDLBCL is limited. Here, we present an approach leveraging cost- and time-sensitivity of digital droplet (dd)PCR to repeatedly assess MRD in rrDLBCL and present proof-of-principle for its ability to predict outcomes.

Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease for Efficacy of Rituximab Maintenance in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Elderly Trial

PURPOSE

The outcome of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved by the introduction of immunochemotherapy, followed by rituximab (R)-maintenance. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) represents a promising tool for individualized treatment decisions and was a prospectively planned part of the European MCL Elderly trial. We investigated how MRD status influenced the efficacy of R-maintenance and how MRD can enable tailored consolidation strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients with MCL age 60 years or older have been randomly assigned to R versus interferon-alpha maintenance after response to rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (R-FC) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP). MRD monitoring was performed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) following EuroMRD guidelines.

RESULTS

A qPCR assay with a median sensitivity of 1 × 10-5 could be generated in 80% of 288 patients in an international, multicenter, multilaboratory setting. More extensive tumor dissemination facilitated the identification of a molecular marker. The efficacy of R-maintenance in clinical remission was confirmed for MRD-negative patients at the end of induction in terms of progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.63]) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.68]), particularly in R-CHOP-treated patients (PFS-HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.52]; OS-HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.52]). R-maintenance appeared less effective in MRD-positive patients (PFS-HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26 to 1.02]) overall and after R-CHOP induction (PFS-HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.26]). R-FC achieved more frequent and faster MRD clearance compared with R-CHOP. MRD positivity in clinical remission after induction was associated with a short median time to clinical progression of approximately 1-1.7 years.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the strong efficacy of R-maintenance in patients who are MRD-negative after induction. Treatment de-escalation for MRD-negative patients is discouraged by our results. More effective consolidation strategies should be explored in MRD-positive patients to improve their long-term prognosis.

Long-term follow-up of rituximab plus bendamustine and cytarabine in older patients with newly diagnosed MCL

The combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and low-dose cytarabine (R-BAC) has been studied in a phase 2 prospective multicenter study from Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (RBAC500). In 57 previously untreated elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), R-BAC was associated with a complete remission rate of 91% and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68-89). Here, we report the long-term survival outcomes, late toxicities, and results of minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation. After a median follow-up of 86 months (range, 57-107 months), the median overall survival (OS) and PFS were not reached. The 7-year PFS and OS rates were 55% (95% CI, 41-67), and 63% (95% CI, 49-74), respectively. Patients who responded (n = 53) had a 7-year PFS of 59% (95% CI, 44-71), with no relapse or progression registered after the sixth year. In the multivariate analysis, blastoid/pleomorphic morphology was the strongest adverse predictive factor for PFS (P = .04). Patients with an end of treatment negative MRD had better, but not significant, outcomes for both PFS and OS than patients with MRD-positive (P = 0.148 and P = 0.162, respectively). There was no signal of late toxicity or an increase in secondary malignancies during the prolonged follow-up. In conclusion, R-BAC, which was not followed by maintenance therapy, showed sustained efficacy over time in older patients with MCL. Survival outcomes compare favorably with those of other immunochemotherapy regimens (with or without maintenance), including combinations of BTK inhibitors upfront. This study was registered with EudraCT as 2011-005739-23 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01662050.

Clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA in indolent B-cell lymphomas

Indolent B-cell lymphomas are generally incurable with standard therapy and most patients have a prolonged disease course that includes multiple treatments and periods of time in which they do not require therapy. Currently available tools to monitor disease burden and define response to treatment rely heavily on imaging scans that lack tumor specificity are unable to detect disease at the molecular level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a versatile and promising biomarker being developed across multiple lymphoma subtypes. Advantages of ctDNA include high tumor specificity and limits of detection that are significantly lower than imaging scans. Potential clinical applications of ctDNA in indolent B-cell lymphomas include baseline prognostication, early signs of treatment resistance, measurements of minimal residual disease, and a noninvasive method to directly monitor disease burden and clonal evolution after therapy. Clinical applications of ctDNA have not yet proven clinical utility but are increasingly used as translational endpoints in clinical trials testing novel approaches and the analytic techniques used for ctDNA continue to evolve. Advances in therapy for indolent B-cell lymphomas include novel targeted agents and combinations that achieve very high rates complete response which amplifies the need to improve our current methods to monitor disease.

Research Topic: Measurable Residual Disease in Hematologic Malignancies. Can digital droplet PCR improve measurable residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphoid malignancies?

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring is progressively changing the management of hematologic malignancies. The possibility of detecting the persistence/reappearance of disease in patients in apparent clinical remission offers a refined risk stratification and a treatment decision making tool. Several molecular techniques are employed to monitor MRD, from conventional real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) to next generation sequencing and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), in different tissues or compartments through the detection of fusion genes, immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements or disease-specific mutations. RQ-PCR is still the gold standard for MRD analysis despite some limitations. ddPCR, considered the third-generation PCR, yields a direct, absolute, and accurate detection and quantification of low-abundance nucleic acids. In the setting of MRD monitoring it carries the major advantage of not requiring a reference standard curve built with the diagnostic sample dilution and of allowing to reduce the number of samples below the quantitative range. At present, the broad use of ddPCR to monitor MRD in the clinical practice is limited by the lack of international guidelines. Its application within clinical trials is nonetheless progressively growing both in acute lymphoblastic leukemia as well as in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The aim of this review is to summarize the accumulating data on the use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring in chronic lymphoid malignancies and to highlight how this new technique is likely to enter into the clinical practice.

Minimal residual disease detection by mutation-specific droplet digital PCR for leukemia/lymphoma

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is usually defined as the small number of cancer cells that remain in the body after treatment. The clinical significance of MRD kinetics is well recognized in treatment of hematologic malignancies, particularly acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Real time quantitative PCR targeting immunoglobulin (Ig) or T-cell receptor (TCR) rearrangement (PCR-MRD), as well as multiparametric flow cytometric analysis targeting antigen expression, are widely used in MRD detection. In this study, we devised an alternative method to detect MRD using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), targeting somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs). This ddPCR-based method (ddPCR-MRD) had sensitivity up to 1E-4. We assessed ddPCR-MRD at 26 time points from eight T-ALL patients, and compared it to the results of PCR-MRD. Almost all results were concordant between the two methods, but ddPCR-MRD detected micro-residual disease that was missed by PCR-MRD in one patient. We also measured MRD in stored ovarian tissue of four pediatric cancer patients, and detected 1E-2 of submicroscopic infiltration. Considering the universality of ddPCR-MRD, the methods can be used as a complement for not only ALL, but also other malignant diseases regardless of tumor-specific Ig/TCR or surface antigen patterns.

Optimizing Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Analysis in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluation has resulted in a fundamental instrument to guide patient management in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). From a methodological standpoint, MRD is defined as any approach aimed at detecting and possibly quantifying residual neoplastic cells beyond the sensitivity level of cytomorphology. The molecular methods to study MRD in ALL are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based approaches and are the most standardized techniques. However, there are some limitations, and emerging technologies, such as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), seem to have advantages that could improve MRD analysis in ALL patients. Furthermore, other blood components, namely cell-free DNA (cfDNA), appear promising and are also being investigated for their potential role in monitoring tumor burden and response to treatment in hematologic malignancies. Based on the review of the literature and on our own data, we hereby discuss how emerging molecular technologies are helping to refine the molecular monitoring of MRD in ALL and may help to overcome some of the limitations of standard approaches, providing a benefit for the care of patients.

Punctual and kinetic MRD analysis from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi MCL0208 phase 3 trial in mantle cell lymphoma

Minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis is a known predictive tool in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We describe MRD results from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi phase 3 MCL0208 prospective clinical trial assessing lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance vs observation after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the first prospective comprehensive analysis of different techniques, molecular markers, and tissues (peripheral blood [PB] and bone marrow [BM]), taken at well-defined time points. Among the 300 patients enrolled, a molecular marker was identified in 250 (83%), allowing us to analyze 234 patients and 4351 analytical findings from 10 time points. ASCT induced high rates of molecular remission (91% in PB and 83% in BM, by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction [RQ-PCR]). Nevertheless, the number of patients with persistent clinical and molecular remission decreased over time in both arms (up to 30% after 36 months). MRD predicted early progression and long-term outcome, particularly from 6 months after ASCT (6-month time to progression [TTP] hazard ratio [HR], 3.83; P < .001). In single-timepoint analysis, BM outperformed PB, and RQ-PCR was more reliable, while nested PCR appeared applicable to a larger number of patients (234 vs 176). To improve MRD performance, we developed a time-varying kinetic model based on regularly updated MRD results and the MIPI (Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index), showing an area under the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve (AUROC) of up to 0.87 using BM. Most notably, PB reached an AUROC of up to 0.81; with kinetic analysis, it was comparable to BM in performance. MRD is a powerful predictor over the entire natural history of MCL and is suitable for models with a continuous adaptation of patient risk. The study can be found in EudraCT N. 2009-012807-25 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/).

Tackling Mantle Cell Lymphoma in Europe

An expert panel convened by the European Alliance for Personalized Medicine (EAPM) reflected on achievements and outstanding challenges in Europe in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Through the prism of member state experience, the panel noted advances in outcomes over the last decade, but highlighted issues constituting barriers to better care. The list notably included availability of newer treatments, infrastructure and funding for related testing, and shortages of relevant skills and of research support. The prospect of improvements was held to reside in closer coordination and cooperation within and between individual countries, and in changes in policy and scale of investment at both national and EU levels.

Digital Droplet PCR Is a Reliable Tool to Improve Minimal Residual Disease Stratification in Adult Philadelphia-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) is an implementation of conventional PCR, with the potential of overcoming some limitations of real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). To evaluate if ddPCR may improve the quantification of disease levels and refine patients' risk stratification, 116 samples at four time points from 44 (35 B-lineage and 9 T-lineage) adult Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL1913 protocol were analyzed by RQ-PCR and ddPCR. A concordance rate between RQ-PCR and ddPCR of 79% (P < 0.0001) was observed; discordances were identified in 21% of samples, with the majority being RQ-PCR-negative (NEG) or positive not quantifiable (PNQ). ddPCR significantly reduced the proportion of PNQ samples-2.6% versus 14% (P = 0.003)-and allowed disease quantifiability in 6.6% of RQ-PCR-NEG, increasing minimal residual disease quantification in 14% of samples. Forty-seven samples were also investigated by next-generation sequencing, which confirmed the ddPCR results in samples classified as RQ-PCR-PNQ or NEG. By reclassifying samples on the basis of the ddPCR results, a better event-free survival stratification of patients was observed compared with RQ-PCR: indeed, ddPCR captured more true-quantifiable samples, with five relapses occurring in three patients who resulted RQ-PCR-PNQ/NEG but proved ddPCR positive quantifiable. At variance, no relapses were recorded in patients whose follow-up samples were RQ-PCR-PNQ but reclassified as ddPCR-NEG. A broader application of ddPCR in acute lymphoblastic leukemia clinical trials will help to improve patients' stratification.

Droplet Digital PCR: A New View on Minimal Residual Disease Quantification in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements has been used as the gold standard for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for >20 years. Recently, new PCR-based technologies have emerged, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which could offer several methodologic advances for MRD monitoring. In the current work, qPCR and ddPCR were compared in an unbiased blinded prospective study (n = 88 measurements) and in a retrospective study with selected critical low positive samples (n = 65 measurements). The former included flow cytometry (Flow; n = 31 measurements) as a third MRD detection method. Published guidelines (qPCR) and the latest, revised evaluation criteria (ie, ddPCR, Flow) have been applied for data analysis. The prospective study shows that ddPCR outperforms qPCR with a significantly better quantitative limit of detection and sensitivity. The number of critical MRD estimates below quantitative limit was reduced by sixfold and by threefold in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of quantitative values between ddPCR and Flow was higher than between ddPCR and qPCR, probably because ddPCR and Flow are absolute quantification methods independent of the diagnostic sample, unlike qPCR. In summary, our data highlight the advantages of ddPCR as a more precise and sensitive technology that could be used to refine response monitoring in ALL.

Digital PCR for Minimal Residual Disease Quantitation Using Immunoglobulin/T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangements in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Proposed Analytic Algorithm

In minimal residual disease (MRD), where there are exceedingly low target copy numbers, digital PCR (dPCR) can improve MRD quantitation. However, standards for dPCR MRD interpretation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia are lacking. Here, for immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor-based MRD, we propose an objective, statistics-based analytic algorithm. In 161 postinduction samples from 79 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MRD was performed by dPCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the same markers and primer-probe sets. The dPCR raw data were analyzed by using an automated algorithm. dPCR and qPCR results were highly concordant (P < 0.0001): 98% (50 of 51) of qPCR positive were positive by dPCR, whereas 95% (61 of 64) of qPCR negative results were also negative by dPCR. For MRD quantitation, both qPCR and dPCR were tightly correlated (R² = 0.94). Using more DNA (1 μg × 7 versus 630 ng × 3), dPCR improved sensitivity of MRD quantitation by one log₁₀ (median MRD positive cutoff 1.6 × 10^-5). With dPCR, 83% (29 of 35) of positive-not-quantifiable results by qPCR could be assigned positive/negative MRD status. Seven replicates of tested samples and negative controls were optimal. Compared with qPCR, dPCR could improve MRD sensitivity by one log₁₀. We proposed an automatable, statistics-based algorithm that minimized interoperator variance for dPCR MRD.

Minimal Residual Disease Analysis by Monitoring Immunoglobulin and T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangements by Quantitative PCR and Droplet Digital PCR

Analysis of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) is the gold standard for sensitive and accurate minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring; it has been extensively standardized and guidelines have been developed within the EuroMRD consortium ( www.euromrd.org ). However, new generations of PCR-based methods are standing out as potential alternatives to RQ-PCR, such as digital PCR technology (dPCR), the third-generation implementation of conventional PCR, which has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of RQ-PCR such as allowing the absolute quantification of nucleic acid targets without the need for a calibration curve. During the last years, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technology has been compared to RQ-PCR in several hematologic malignancies showing its proficiency for MRD analysis. So far, no established guidelines for ddPCR MRD analysis and data interpretation have been defined and its potential is still under investigation. However, a major standardization effort is underway within the EuroMRD consortium ( www.euromrd.org ) for future application of ddPCR in standard clinical practice.

Digital Droplet PCR in Hematologic Malignancies: A New Useful Molecular Tool

Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) is a recent version of quantitative PCR (QT-PCR), useful for measuring gene expression, doing clonality assays and detecting hot spot mutations. In respect of QT-PCR, ddPCR is more sensitive, does not need any reference curve and can quantify one quarter of samples already defined as "positive but not quantifiable". In the IgH and TCR clonality assessment, ddPCR recapitulates the allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR), being not adapt for detecting clonal evolution, that, on the contrary, does not represent a pitfall for the next generation sequencing (NGS) technique. Differently from NGS, ddPCR is not able to sequence the whole gene, but it is useful, cheaper, and less time-consuming when hot spot mutations are the targets, such as occurs with IDH1, IDH2, NPM1 in acute leukemias or T315I mutation in Philadelphia-positive leukemias or JAK2 in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Further versions of ddPCR, that combine different primers/probes fluorescences and concentrations, allow measuring up to four targets in the same PCR reaction, sparing material, time, and money. ddPCR is also useful for quantitating BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, WT1 expression, donor chimerism, and minimal residual disease, so helping physicians to realize that "patient-tailored therapy" that is the aim of the modern hematology.

Quantification of Minimal Disease by Digital PCR in ALK-Positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Step towards Risk Stratification in International Trials?

Minimal disseminated and residual disease (MDD/MRD) analyzed by qualitative PCR for NPM-ALK fusion transcripts are validated prognostic factors in pediatric ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Although potentially promising, MDD quantification by quantitative real-time PCR in international trials is technically challenging. Quantification of early MRD might further improve risk stratification. We aimed to assess droplet digital PCR for quantification of minimal disease in an inter-laboratory setting in a large cohort of 208 uniformly treated ALCL patients. Inter-laboratory quality control showed high concordance. Using a previously described cut-off of 30 copies NPM-ALK/104 copies ABL1 (NCN) in bone marrow and peripheral blood, MDD quantification allowed identification of very high-risk patients (5-year PFS% 34 ± 5 for patients with ≥30 NCN compared to 74 ± 6 and 76 ± 5 for patients with negative or <30 NCN, respectively, p < 0.0001). While MRD positivity was confirmed as a prognostic marker for the detection of very high-risk patients in this large study, quantification of MRD fusion transcripts did not improve stratification. PFS% was 80 ± 5 and 73 ± 6 for MDD- and MRD-negative patients, respectively, versus 35 ± 10 and 16 ± 8 for MRD-positive patients with <30 and ≥30 NCN, p < 0.0001. Our results suggest that MDD quantification by dPCR enables improved patient stratification in international clinical studies and patient selection for early clinical trials already at diagnosis.

Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review

In the era of personalized medicine and targeted therapies for the management of patients with cancer, ultrasensitive detection methods for tumor genotyping, such as next-generation sequencing or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), play a significant role. In the search for less invasive strategies for diagnosis, prognosis and disease monitoring, the number of publications regarding liquid biopsy approaches using ddPCR has increased substantially in recent years. There is a long list of malignancies in which ddPCR provides a reliable and accurate tool for detection of nucleic acid-based markers derived from cell-free DNA, cell-free RNA, circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles or exosomes when isolated from whole blood, plasma and serum, helping to anticipate tumor relapse or unveil intratumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution in response to treatment. This updated review describes recent developments in ddPCR platforms and provides a general overview about the major applications of liquid biopsy in blood, including its utility for molecular response and minimal residual disease monitoring in hematological malignancies or the therapeutic management of patients with colorectal or lung cancer, particularly for the selection and monitoring of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although plasma is the main source of genetic material for tumor genomic profiling, liquid biopsy by ddPCR is being investigated in a wide variety of biologic fluids, such as cerebrospinal fluid, urine, stool, ocular fluids, sputum, saliva, bronchoalveolar lavage, pleural effusion, mucin, peritoneal fluid, fine needle aspirate, bile or pancreatic juice. The present review focuses on these "alternative" sources of genetic material and their analysis by ddPCR in different kinds of cancers.

Analytical Quality Controls for ddPCR Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a promising technique for absolute quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but there is no comprehensive quality assurance program to enable its application in clinical laboratories. Current guidelines for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) gene rearrangements needed adaptation for ddPCR to cover droplet generation, intraassay variation, and interassay variation in the absence of standard curves.

Methods

Six qPCR MRD assays for Ig/TCR gene rearrangements and a standard albumin control gene assay were migrated to a ddPCR platform and used to test 82 remission samples from 6 patients with ALL. Three analytical quality controls (QC) were developed and evaluated for ddPCR MRD detection.

Results

Analytical QC for droplet number generation (DN-QC), for albumin ddPCR assay performance (Alb-QC) and for patient-specific marker assay performance (PS-QC) were established with pass/fail limits and corresponding QC rules. Compared to established qPCRs, the ddPCR assays had comparable sensitivity and quantitative range. Overall, there was close agreement (91%) of MRD results between qPCR and ddPCR (κ = 0.86, P &lt; 0.0001) and stronger concordance in 32 quantifiable samples (R2 = 0.97, P &lt; 0.0001).

Conclusions

The use of this newly developed quality control system for ddPCR MRD testing avoids the need to repeat standard curves and provides reliable results comparable to standardized qPCR methods for MRD detection in ALL.

Toward Pediatric T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma Stratification Based on Minimal Disseminated Disease and NOTCH1/FBXW7 Status

While outcome for pediatric T lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL) has improved with acute leukemia-type therapy, survival after relapse remains rare. Few prognostic markers have been identified: NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 (N/F) mutations identify good prognosis T-LL and high-level minimal disseminated disease (MDD) is reported to be of poor prognosis. We evaluated MDD and/or MRD status by 8-color flow cytometry and/or digital droplet PCR in 82 pediatric T-LL treated according to the EURO-LB02 prednisone reference arm. Both techniques gave identical results for values ≥0.1%, allowing compilation. Unlike historical studies, an MDD threshold of 1% had no prognostic significance. The 54% (42/78) of patients with MDD ≥0.1% had a relatively favorable outcome (5-y overall survival [OS] 97.6% versus 80.6%, P = 0.015, 5-y event-free-survival [EFS] 95.2% versus 80.6%, P = 0.049). MDD lower than 0.1% had no impact in N/F mutated T-LL, but identified the N/F germline patient with a high risk of relapse. Combining oncogenetic and MDD status identified 86% of patients (n = 49) with an excellent outcome and 14% of N/F germline/MDD <0.1% patients (n = 8) with poor prognosis (5y-OS 95.9% versus 37.5%, P < 0.001; 5y-EFS 93.9% versus 37.5%, P < 0.001). If confirmed by prospective studies, MDD and N/F mutational status would allow identification of a subset of patients who merit consideration for alternative front-line treatment.

Applicability of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for minimal residual disease monitoring in Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

In Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ ALL), minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most relevant prognostic factor. Currently, its evaluation is based on quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (Q‐RT‐PCR). Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was successfully applied to several haematological malignancies. We analyzed 98 samples from 40 Ph+ ALL cases, the majority enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL2116 trial: 10 diagnostic samples and 88 follow‐up samples, mostly focusing on positive non‐quantifiable (PNQ) or negative samples by Q‐RT‐PCR to investigate the value of ddPCR for MRD monitoring. DdPCR BCR/ABL1 assay showed good sensitivity and accuracy to detect low levels of transcripts, with a high rate of reproducibility. The analysis of PNQ or negative cases by Q‐RT‐PCR revealed that ddPCR increased the proportion of quantifiable samples (p < 0.0001). Indeed, 29/54 PNQ samples (53.7%) proved positive and quantifiable by ddPCR, whereas 13 (24.1%) were confirmed as PNQ by ddPCR and 12 (22.2%) proved negative. Among 24 Q‐RT‐PCR‐negative samples, 13 (54.1%) were confirmed negative, four (16.7%) resulted PNQ and seven (29.2%) proved positive and quantifiable by ddPCR. Four of 5 patients, evaluated at different time points, who were negative by Q‐RT‐PCR and positive by ddPCR experienced a relapse. DdPCR appears useful for MRD monitoring in adult Ph+ ALL.

Assessment of Clonotypic Rearrangements and Minimal Residual Disease in Lymphoid Malignancies: A Large Cancer Center Experience Using clonoSEQ

CONTEXT.—

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) is an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies and has been incorporated into consensus criteria regarding treatment response, strategy, and clinical trial endpoints. clonoSEQ (a next-generation sequencing [NGS]-MRD assay) uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction and NGS to identify clonotypic rearrangements at the immunoglobulin (Ig) H, IgK, IgL, T-cell receptor (TCR)-β, and TCR-γ loci, and translocated B-cell lymphoma 1/IgH and 2/IgH sequences for MRD assessment. Additionally, it can be used to confirm diagnoses of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the technical aspects of our experience using the clonoSEQ Assay in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN.—

In this single-center experience, 390 patients with lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies were assessed with the NGS-MRD Assay at a central laboratory.

RESULTS.—

Median time from arrival of the shipment to initiation of the assay (defined as captured in Adaptive's secure tracking system) was 2.1 hours. Overall, 317 patients had 1 or more samples submitted for sequence identification. Of these, 290 (91.5%) had trackable sequences identified. The median calibration rate of samples by malignancy (where n ≥ 10 samples, excluding CTCL samples) was 88.1%, across a variety of fresh and archived sample sources (177 of 201 samples). TCR-β and/or TCR-γ clonotypes were identified in 40 of 95 samples (42.1%) from 66 patients with suspected CTCL.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This NGS-MRD Assay is a valuable and sensitive tool for monitoring MRD in patients with plasma cell and lymphoid malignancies and assisting in the diagnosis of CTCL.

Multiplex technologies for the assessment of minimal residual disease and low-level mutation detection in leukaemia: mass spectrometry versus next-generation sequencing

With the focus of leukaemia management shifting to the implications of low-level disease burden, increasing attention is being paid on the development of highly sensitive methodologies required for detection. There are various techniques capable of identification of measurable residual disease (MRD) either evidencing as relevant mutation detection [e.g. nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation] or trace levels of leukaemic clonal populations. The vast majority of these methods only permit detection of a single clone or mutation. However, mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing enable the interrogation of multiple genes simultaneously, facilitating a more complete genomic profile. In the present review, we explore the methodologies of both techniques in conjunction with the important advantages and limitations associated with each assay. We also highlight the evidence and the various instances where either technique has been used and propose future strategies for MRD detection.

Minimal Disease Monitoring in Pediatric Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Current Clinical Application and Future Challenges

Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection is established routine practice for treatment stratification in leukemia and used for treatment optimization in adult lymphomas. Minimal disease studies in childhood non-Hodgkin lymphomas are challenged by stratified treatment in different subtypes, high cure rates, low patient numbers, limited initial tumor material, and early progression. Current clinical applications differ between the subtypes. A prognostic value of minimal disseminated disease (MDD) could not yet be clearly established for lymphoblastic lymphoma using flow cytometry and PCR-based methods for T-cell receptor (TCR) or immunoglobulin (IG) rearrangements. MYC-IGH fusion sequences or IG rearrangements enable minimal disease detection in Burkitt lymphoma and -leukemia. An additional prognostic value of MDD in Burkitt lymphoma and early MRD in Burkitt leukemia is implicated by single studies with risk-adapted therapy. MDD and MRD determined by PCR for ALK-fusion transcripts are independent prognostic parameters for patients with ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). They are introduced in routine clinical practice and used for patient stratification in clinical studies. Early MRD might serve as an endpoint for clinical trials and for guiding individual therapy. Validation of MDD and MRD as prognostic parameters is required for all subtypes but ALCL. Next-generation sequencing-based methods may provide new options and applications for minimal disease evaluation in childhood lymphomas.

Perspective: sensitive detection of residual lymphoproliferative disease by NGS and clonal rearrangements-how low can you go?

Malignant lymphoproliferative disorders collectively constitute a large fraction of the hematological cancers, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive neoplasms. Being a diagnostically important hallmark, clonal gene rearrangements of the immunoglobulins enable the detection of residual disease in the clinical course of patients down to a minute fraction of malignant cells. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided unprecedented assay specificity, with a sensitivity matching that of polymerase chain reaction-based measurable residual disease (MRD) detection down to the 10^-6 level. Although reaching 10^-6 to 10^-7 is theoretically feasible, employing a sufficient amount of DNA and sequencing coverage is placed in the perspective of the practical challenges when relying on clinical samples in contrast to controlled serial dilutions. As we discuss, the randomness of subsampling must be taken into account to accommodate the sensitivity threshold-in terms of both the required number of cells and sequencing coverage. As a substantial part of the reviewed studies do not state the depth of coverage or even amount of DNA in some cases, we call for increased transparency to enable critical assessment of the MRD assays for clinical implementation and feasibility.

Mantle cell lymphoma - advances in molecular biology, prognostication and treatment approaches

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is clinically characterised by its heterogenous behaviour with courses ranging from indolent cases that do not require therapy for years to highly aggressive MCL with a very limited prognosis. A better understanding of the complex biology of MCL has already led to the approval of several innovative agents, expanding the landscape of MCL therapies and improving therapeutic options especially for refractory/relapsed (R/R) disease. Nevertheless, to further optimise MCL treatment, early identification of individual risk profile and risk-adapted, patient-tailored choice of therapeutic strategy needs to be prospectively incorporated into clinical patient management. The present review highlights recent advances in deciphering the molecular background of MCL, the definition of prognostically relevant factors and the identification of potential druggable targets and summarises current treatment recommendations for primary and R/R MCL including novel targeted therapies.

Invited Review: Will Consolidation with ASCT Be a Thing of the Past for MCL and PTCL?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment landscape of mantle cell (MCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) is rapidly changing; however, despite improvement in patients' survival, they still remain a largely incurable diseases. Treatment choice is dependent on patient factors, prior therapy, remission duration, and candidacy for stem cell transplantation (SCT). There are subsets of high-risk patients who do not benefit substantially from autologous SCT (ASCT) and for whom alternative targeted approaches are being examined. Here, we critically analyze the actual role of ASCT in PTCL and MCL.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research in areas of maintenance therapy and minimal residual disease is ongoing to identify MCL patients who may not require ASCT for durable response. Moreover, there are subsets of high-risk MCL patients who do not benefit substantially from ASCT and for whom alternative, targeted approaches are being examined. Much less clear evidence exists regarding the impact of consolidative ASCT in PTCL, mainly for the heterogeneity of these lymphomas: it is still controversial whether patients who achieved a complete response significantly take advantage of this procedure over active surveillance only. Several clinical and biologic markers are available to predict prognosis; however, despite improvements in outcomes, standard therapeutic approaches have not been able to overcome high-risk disease features for PTCL and MCL. Thus, the need of ASCT for these diseases is still matter of debate among hematologists.

Droplet Digital PCR Improves IG-/TR-based MRD Risk Definition in Childhood B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most powerful prognostic factor in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) represents the gold standard for molecular MRD assessment and risk-based stratification of front-line treatment. In the protocols of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) and the Berlin-Frankfurth-Munschen (BFM) group AIEOP-BFM ALL2009 and ALL2017, B-lineage ALL patients with high RQ-PCR-MRD at day+33 and positive at day+78 are defined slow early responders (SERs). Based on results of the AIEOP-BFM ALL2000 study, these patients are treated as high-risk also when positive MRD signal at day +78 is below the lower limit of quantification of RQ-PCR (“positive not-quantifiable,” POS-NQ). To assess whether droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) could improve patients’ risk definition, we analyzed MRD in 209 pediatric B-lineage ALL cases classified by RQ-PCR as POS-NQ and/or negative (NEG) at days +33 and/or +78 in the AIEOP-BFM ALL2000 trial. ddPCR MRD analysis was performed on 45 samples collected at day +78 from SER patients, who had RQ-PCR MRD ≥ 5.0 × 10^–4 at day+33 and POS-NQ at day+78 and were treated as medium risk (MR). The analysis identified 13 of 45 positive quantifiable cases. Most relapses occurred in this patients’ subgroup, while ddPCR NEG or ddPCR-POS-NQ patients had a significantly better outcome (P < 0.001). Overall, in 112 MR cases and 52 standard-risk patients, MRD negativity and POS-NQ were confirmed by the ddPCR analysis except for a minority of cases, for whom no differences in outcome were registered. These data indicate that ddPCR is more accurate than RQ-PCR in the measurement of MRD, particularly in late follow-up time points, and may thus allow improving patients’ stratification in ALL protocols.

Circulating tumour DNA in B-cell lymphomas: current state and future prospects

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a highly versatile analyte and an emerging biomarker for detection of tumour-specific sequences in lymphoid malignancies. Since ctDNA is derived from tumour cells throughout the body, it overcomes fundamental limitations of tissue biopsies by capturing the complete molecular profile of tumours, including those from inaccessible anatomic locations. Assays for ctDNA are minimally invasive and serial sampling monitors the effectiveness of therapy and identifies minimal residual disease below the detection limit of standard imaging scans. Dynamic changes in ctDNA levels measure real-time tumour kinetics, and early reductions in ctDNA during treatment correlate with clinical outcomes in multiple B-cell lymphomas. After therapy, ctDNA can effectively discriminate between patients who achieved a complete molecular remission from those with residual treatment-resistant disease. Serial monitoring of ctDNA after therapy can detect early molecular relapse and identify drug-resistant clones that harbour targetable mutations. In order for ctDNA to reach its full potential, the standardization and harmonization of the optimal pre-analytical and analytical techniques for B-cell lymphomas is a critically necessary requirement. Prospective validation of ctDNA within clinical studies is also required to determine its clinical utility as an adjunctive decision-making tool.

Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring Using a 3'ALK Universal Probe Assay in ALK-Positive Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma: ddPCR, an Attractive Alternative Method to Real-Time Quantitative PCR

In ALK-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphomas, positive qualitative PCR for NPM1-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow at diagnosis and during treatment are associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Real-time quantitative PCR allows identification of very high risk patients. However, this latter technique initially designed for patients with lymphomas carrying the most frequent NPM1-ALK translocation necessitates calibration curves, limiting interlaboratory reproducibility. An ALK universal quantitative PCR based on 3'ALK transcript amplification was designed to allow the detection of all ALK fusion transcripts. The absolute concordance of 3'ALK quantitative PCR results were validated with the routine NPM1-ALK qualitative and quantitative PCR on 46 samples. The universality of ALK fusion transcript detection also was validated on TPM3-, ALO17-, and ATIC-ALK-positive samples, and the EML4-ALK-positive cell line. Digital droplet PCR using the 3'ALK universal probe showed highly concordant results with 3'ALK universal quantitative PCR. A major benefit of digital droplet PCR is a reduced experimental set-up compared with quantitative PCR, without generation of standard curves, leading to a reliable protocol for multilaboratory validation in multicenter clinical trials essential for this rare pathology. Our ALK universal method could be used for the screening of ALK fusion transcripts in liquid biopsy specimens of other ALK-positive tumors, including non-small cell lung carcinomas.

Advances in the assessment of minimal residual disease in mantle cell lymphoma

The clinical impact of minimal residual disease detection at early time points or during follow-ups has been shown to accurately predict relapses among patients with lymphomas, mainly in follicular and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The field of minimal residual disease testing in mantle cell lymphoma is still evolving but has great impact in determining the prognosis. Flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction-based testing are most commonly used methods in practice; however, these methods are not sensitive enough to detect the dynamic changes that underline lymphoma progression. Newer methods using next-generation sequencing, such as ClonoSeq, are being incorporated in clinical trials. Other techniques under evolution include CAPP-seq and anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based methods. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive update on the status of minimal residual disease detection and its prognostic effect in mantle cell patients. The role of circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease detection in lymphomas is also discussed.

Molecular response after obinutuzumab plus high-dose cytarabine induction for transplant-eligible patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma (LyMa-101): a phase 2 trial of the LYSA group

BACKGROUND

Obinutuzumab monotherapy has shown promising efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma. We aimed to investigate the activity of obinutuzumab plus DHAP (dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin), measured by minimal residual disease quantitative (q)PCR status in the bone marrow after four cycles.

METHODS

LyMa-101 was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Participants were enrolled from 28 hospitals in France. Newly diagnosed patients with mantle cell lymphoma (aged 18 to <66 years) who were eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation received four cycles of obinutuzumab plus DHAP (obinutuzumab 1000 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 at cycle 1 and day 1 at cycles 2, 3, and 4; dexamethasone 40 mg intravenously on days 1-4, cytarabine 2 g/m² intravenously every 12 h on day 1, and according to local investigator, cisplatin 100 mg/m² by continuous infusion over 24 h on day 1 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m²) every 21 days before transplantation, and 3 years of obinutuzumab (1000 mg/m² every 2 months) maintenance followed by minimal residual disease-based obinutuzumab on-demand maintenance. The primary outcome was minimal residual disease negativity in the bone marrow after four cycles of obinutuzumab plus DHAP at the end of induction, measured in the efficacy set (all minimal residual disease-informative [bone marrow or peripheral blood] patients who received at least one dose of obinutuzumab). Obinutuzumab plus DHAP was considered effective if bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity was 70% or more by intention to treat. The trial is closed to recruitment and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02896582.

FINDINGS

86 patients were enrolled between Nov 29, 2016, and May 2, 2018. 81 patients completed induction, 73 underwent autologous stem-cell transplantation, and 69 started maintenance therapy. 55 (75%) of 73 patients in the efficacy set reached minimal residual disease negativity in bone marrow at end of induction. According to the protocol definition, 18 (25%) of 73 patients in the efficacy set were minimal residual disease-positive: 12 patients who were minimal residual disease-positive in the bone marrow, plus two patients who progressed during induction, and four patients who did not have minimal residual disease assessment. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (grade 3, 26 [31%] of 85 patients; grade 4, three [4%] of 85 patients) and neutropenia (grade 3, 13 [15%] of 85 patients; grade 4, 32 [38%] of 85 patients). 58 serious adverse events occurred during the induction phase. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Obinutuzumab plus DHAP is a well tolerated regimen and has good activity for inducing minimal residual disease negativity in the bone marrow of transplant-eligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Obinutuzumab plus DHAP has potential activity as induction chemotherapy, with bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity potentially predicting long-term disease control.

FUNDING

Roche SAS.

Immunoglobulin kappa deleting element rearrangements are candidate targets for minimal residual disease evaluation in mantle cell lymphoma

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is of high clinical relevance in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In mature B-cell malignancies, the presence of somatic hypermutations (SHM) in Variable-Diversity-Joining Heavy chain (VDJH) rearrangements leads to frequent mismatches between primers, probes, and the target, thus impairing tumor cells quantification. Alternative targets, such as immunoglobulin kappa-deleting-element (IGK-Kde) rearrangements, might be suitable for MRD detection. We aimed at evaluating the applicability of IGK-Kde rearrangements for MRD quantification in MCL patients by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)/digital-droplet-PCR (ddPCR). IGK screening was performed on bone marrow samples from two cohorts: the first from Turin (22 patients enrolled in the FIL-MCL0208 trial, NCT02354313) and the second from Rome (15 patients). IGK-Kde rearrangements were found in 76% (28/37) of cases, representing the sole molecular marker in 73% (8/11) of IGH-BCL1/IGH negative cases. MRD RQ-PCR monitoring was possible in 57% (16/28) of cases, showing a 100% concordance with the conventional targets. However, the frequent background amplification affected the sensitivity of the assay, that was lower in MCL compared to acute lymphoblastic leukemia and in line with multiple myeloma published results. ddPCR had a good concordance with RQ-PCR and it might help to identify false positive/negative results. From a clinical perspective, we suggest that IGK-Kde can be a candidate target for MRD monitoring and deserves a validation of its predictive value in prospective MCL series.

Digital PCR: A Reliable Tool for Analyzing and Monitoring Hematologic Malignancies

The digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is considered to be the third-generation polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as it yields direct, absolute and precise measures of target sequences. dPCR has proven particularly useful for the accurate detection and quantification of low-abundance nucleic acids, highlighting its advantages in cancer diagnosis and in predicting recurrence and monitoring minimal residual disease, mostly coupled with next generation sequencing. In the last few years, a series of studies have employed dPCR for the analysis of hematologic malignancies. In this review, we will summarize these findings, attempting to focus on the potential future perspectives of the application of this promising technology.