An open study of aripiprazole and escitalopram for psychotic major depressive disorder

Computational Model of Antidepressant Response Heterogeneity as Multi-pathway Neuroadaptation

Current hypotheses cannot fully explain the clinically observed heterogeneity in antidepressant response. The therapeutic latency of antidepressants suggests that therapeutic outcomes are achieved not by the acute effects of the drugs, but rather by the homeostatic changes that occur as the brain adapts to their chronic administration. We present a computational model that represents the known interactions between the monoaminergic neurotransmitter-producing brain regions and associated non-monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems, and use the model to explore the possible ways in which the brain can homeostatically adjust to chronic antidepressant administration. The model also represents the neuron-specific neurotransmitter receptors that are known to adjust their strengths (expressions or sensitivities) in response to chronic antidepressant administration, and neuroadaptation in the model occurs through sequential adjustments in these receptor strengths. The main result is that the model can reach similar levels of adaptation to chronic administration of the same antidepressant drug or combination along many different pathways, arriving correspondingly at many different receptor strength configurations, but not all of those adapted configurations are also associated with therapeutic elevations in monoamine levels. When expressed as the percentage of adapted configurations that are also associated with elevations in one or more of the monoamines, our modeling results largely agree with the percentage efficacy rates of antidepressants and antidepressant combinations observed in clinical trials. Our neuroadaptation model provides an explanation for the clinical reports of heterogeneous outcomes among patients chronically administered the same antidepressant drug regimen.

Medication Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Severe Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features: Antidepressant and Second-Generation Antipsychotic Therapy Versus Antidepressant Monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder with psychotic features, or psychotic depression, is a severe mental health disorder often associated with a worse depression-related symptom profile when compared with major depressive disorder without psychotic features. While combination pharmacotherapy with an antidepressant and an antipsychotic is recommended as first-line therapy, antidepressant monotherapy has been found to be useful and efficacious in psychotic depression.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rates of antidepressant adherence and antidepressant persistence in Texas Medicaid patients with psychotic depression who used antidepressant plus second-generation antipsychotic (AD/SGA) therapy or antidepressant (AD) monotherapy.

METHODS

Using Texas Medicaid prescription and medical claims data from September 2007 to December 2012, adult patients aged 18-63 years were included if they had no confounding psychiatric disorders, no antidepressant claims during a 6-month pre-index period, and at least 1 diagnosis for severe major depressive disorder with psychotic features (ICD-9-CM codes 296.24 and 296.34). The first claim date for an antidepressant served as the index date. All patients were required to have at least 2 antidepressant claims, and those in the AD/SGA cohort were required to have 2 or more claims for an SGA. Study covariates included age, gender, race/ethnicity, residence, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, and tobacco use/dependence. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 926 patients met study criteria (AD cohort = 510; AD/SGA cohort = 416). The overall sample had a mean [±SD] age of 40.5 [±13.2] years and was primarily female (66.8%) and non-Caucasian (74.8%). When compared with the AD cohort, patients in the AD/SGA cohort had a 52.3% higher likelihood of being adherent to antidepressant therapy based on proportion of days covered (PDC; OR = 1.523; 95% CI = 1.129-2.053; P = 0.006). Similarly, antidepressant adherence was 42.0% higher for the AD/SGA cohort based on medication possession ratio (MPR; OR = 1.420; 95% CI = 1.062-1.898; P = 0.018). Younger patients, African Americans, and tobacco users/dependents had significantly worse likelihoods of antidepressant medication adherence based on PDC and MPR. The risk of antidepressant nonpersistence was 23.2% lower for patients in the AD/SGA cohort (HR = 0.768; 95% CI = 0.659-0.896; P = 0.001), compared with those in the AD cohort. Antidepressant nonpersistence was significantly higher in younger patients, African Americans, Hispanics, and tobacco users/dependents.

CONCLUSIONS

Better antidepressant adherence and persistence outcomes were associated with combination pharmacotherapy with an AD and an SGA antipsychotic. This study provides real-world estimates that support the current first-line treatment recommendations for psychotic depression; however, it should be noted that the majority of study patients used AD therapy only. Future research in psychotic depression is needed.

DISCLOSURES

Kim-Romo received funding to conduct this study from the PhRMA Foundation Pre-Doctoral Fellowship in Health Outcomes. Rascati, Richards, Ford, Wilson, and Beretvas declare no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. Kim-Romo and Rascati collaborated on the study design, data analysis, study interpretation, and writing of this manuscript. Richards, Ford, Wilson, and Beretvas provided critical evaluation of the study design, analysis, and interpretation, as well as edited this manuscript.

A Meta-Analysis Comparing Open-Label versus Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials for Aripiprazole Augmentation in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: Lessons and Promises

OBJECTIVE

The present study is to provide whether open-label studies (OLS) may properly foresee the efficacy of randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) using OLSs and RCTs data for aripiprazole in the treatment of MDD, with the use of meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

A search of the studies used the key terms "depression and aripiprazole" from the databases of PubMed/PsychInfo from Jan 2005 through July 2013. The data were selected and verified for publication in English-based peer-reviewed journals based on rigorous inclusion criteria. Extracted data were delivered into and run by the Comprehensive Meta Analysis program v2.

RESULTS

The pooled SMDs for the primary efficacy measure was statistically significant, pointing out the significant reduction of depressive symptoms after aripiprazole augmentation (AA) to current antidepressant treatment in OLSs (pooled SMD=-2.114, z=-9.625, p<0.001); similar results were also found in RCTs (pooled SMD=-2.202, z=-6.862, p<0.001). The meta-regression analysis revealed no influence of the study design for treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the treatment effects of aripiprazole as an augmentation therapy in both OLSs and RCTs, indicating that open-label design may be a potentially useful predictor for treatment outcomes of controlled-clinical trials. The proper conduction of OLSs may provide informative, useful and preliminary clinical data and factors to be involved in controlled-clinical trials, by which we may have better understanding on the role of AA (e.g., dosing issues, proper duration of treatment, specific population for AA) implicated in the treatment of MDD in clinical practice.

Intracellular pathways of antipsychotic combined therapies: implication for psychiatric disorders treatment

Dysfunctions in the interplay among multiple neurotransmitter systems have been implicated in the wide range of behavioral, emotional and cognitive symptoms displayed by major psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depression. The complex clinical presentation of these pathologies often needs the use of multiple pharmacological treatments, in particular (1) when monotherapy provides insufficient improvement of the core symptoms; (2) when there are concurrent additional symptoms requiring more than one class of medication and (3) in order to improve tolerability, by using two compounds below their individual dose thresholds to limit side effects. To date, the choice of drug combinations is based on empirical paradigm guided by clinical response. Nonetheless, several preclinical studies have demonstrated that drugs commonly used to treat psychiatric disorders may impact common intracellular target molecules (e.g. Akt/GSK-3 pathway, MAP kinases pathway, postsynaptic density proteins). These findings support the hypothesis that convergence at crucial steps of transductional pathways could be responsible for synergistic effects obtained in clinical practice by the co-administration of those apparently heterogeneous pharmacological compounds. Here we review the most recent evidence on the molecular crossroads in antipsychotic combined therapies with antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines, as well as with antipsychotics. We first discuss clinical clues and efficacy of such combinations. Then we focus on the pharmacodynamics and on the intracellular pathways underpinning the synergistic, or concurrent, effects of each therapeutic add-on strategy, as well as we also critically appraise how pharmacological research may provide new insights on the putative molecular mechanisms underlying major psychiatric disorders.

Minocycline as adjunctive therapy for patients with unipolar psychotic depression: an open-label study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25% of patients admitted to a hospital as a result of depression are actually suffering from psychotic depression. Psychotic symptoms can be present in patients with either unipolar depression or bipolar depression and can be difficult to treat. It was reported the second-generation tetracycline may exert potential antidepressant effects through its robust neuroprotective activities, which include neurogenesis, antioxidation, and anti-glutamate excitotoxicity, and may direct regulation of pro-inflammatory agents.

METHODS

This was a 6-week, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in combination with antidepressants in adult inpatients (n=25) diagnosed with major depression with psychotic features (psychotic depression) according to DSM-IV-TR. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-21) score from baseline to week 6. Secondary endpoints were changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale scores from baseline to week 6. Spontaneously reported adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The patients' average age was 46.9±10.2 years. Minocyline (150 mg/day) in combination with antidepressants (fulvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline) provided significant improvement in depression. Mean (± SD) HAM-D-21 was reduced to 6.7±1.9 at week 6 from a baseline value of 40.4±2.5. Significant improvement of psychotic symptoms (mean±SD) was indicated by the decrease in BPRS scores from baseline (63.3±8.7) to week 6 (4.6±2.4). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data suggest that minocycline in combination with antidepressants is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of unipolar psychotic depression. Further studies using larger, double-blind, parallel-group design are warranted to confirm these findings.

Psychosocial functioning, familiality, and psychiatric comorbidity in bipolar youth with and without psychotic features

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have examined the correlates of psychosis in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder (BPD). We examined psychiatric comorbidity, familiality, and psychosocial functioning in multiple domains in BPD children and adolescents with and without psychotic features.

METHOD

As part of 2 ongoing family-based studies of children and adolescents with DSM-IV-defined BPD, we compared youth and their families with psychotic symptoms (BPD+P) and without psychotic symptoms (BPD-P). All youth and family members were assessed using indirect and direct structured psychiatric interviews (Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders-Epidemiologic Version and DSM-IV Structured Clinical Interview) in a blinded manner. One study was conducted from January 2000 through December 2004, and the other study was conducted from February 1997 through September 2006.

RESULTS

Of the 226 youth with BPD, 33% manifested psychotic symptoms, as defined by the presence of hallucinations or delusions. We found that BPD+P youth had a greater number of BPD episodes (P < .01), more psychiatric hospitalizations (P < .01), and significantly higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity compared to BPD-P youth (all P values < .05). Additionally, a higher percentage of BPD+P youth had a family history of psychosis (P = .01). There was a lower processing speed (P = .03) and lower arithmetic scaled score (P = .04) in BPD+P youth, but no other meaningful differences in cognitive variables were identified between the 2 BPD groups. Psychosis in BPD was also associated with decreased family cohesion (P = .04) and poorer overall global functioning (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In children and adolescents with BPD, those who manifest psychotic features have higher rates of comorbid psychopathology, family history of psychosis, and poorer overall functioning in multiple domains than BPD children without psychosis. Future studies should examine neuroimaging correlates, medication response, and longitudinal course of children and adolescents with BPD who manifest psychosis as part of their clinical picture.

Neurobiological bases and clinical aspects of the use of aripiprazole in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder

Addition of atypical antipsychotics to the therapeutic regimen of patients with unipolar major depressive disorder not responding adequately to their treatment has become a common intervention. With all these agents the observation that low doses that are ineffective in schizophrenia, and thus not blocking dopamine D2 receptors effectively, indicate that their beneficial action is attributable to their action at other receptors. Preclinical research has shown that atypical antipsychotics can reverse the suppression of firing of norepinephrine neurons produced by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors through their antagonism of 5-HT₂(A) receptors. In the case of aripiprazole, three large placebo-controlled studies in more than 1,000 patients individually concluded to significant antidepressant responses and remissions after a six-week treatment. Aripiprazole addition did not produce more discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo. The most frequently encountered adverse events were akathisia and restlessness. Weight gain was minimal but significant in two of the three studies, suggesting that this side effect is not major problem. There was no significant laboratory abnormalities noted with this strategy. It is proposed that because of its long half-life (approximately 3 days), the doses of aripiprazole were escalated too rapidly in these controlled trials. More gradual titration may lead in routine clinical practice to better outcomes, minimizing side effects and improving remission rates.

Aripiprazole: a clinical review of its use for the treatment of anxiety disorders and anxiety as a comorbidity in mental illness

BACKGROUND

Although anxiety disorders are common, optimal treatment is elusive. More than half of anxiety patients treated with an adequate course of antidepressants fail to fully improve: treatment resistance, residual symptoms, and recurrence/relapse remain a challenge. Recently, atypical antipsychotics have been considered for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders. This review will explore the available data for the role of aripiprazole in the treatment of anxiety.

METHODS

PubMed and conference abstracts were searched for randomized, double-blind studies that investigated the efficacy of aripiprazole in anxiety; its efficacy in bipolar disorder and depression was also explored for comparison.

RESULTS

A number of studies have shown atypical antipsychotics to be effective in anxiety, and currently available data suggest that aripiprazole augmentation in patients with anxiety disorders is likely as effective as other atypical antipsychotic drugs. Although there have been no randomized, controlled trials, aripiprazole has been found to be effective in treating anxiety disorders in two open-label trials. This combined with the larger data base demonstrating its utility in bipolar disorder and depression, its safety profile and its unique mechanism of action, make aripiprazole for anxiety an intriguing avenue of exploration.

LIMITATIONS

Data from large randomized, controlled trials on the use of atypical antipsychotics for anxiety in general, and aripiprazole in particular, are currently lacking.

CONCLUSION

The results of open-label trials of aripiprazole in anxiety provide enough support to warrant its further study. This, combined with a larger data base demonstrating its utility in bipolar disorder and depression, its safety profile and its unique mechanism of action, make aripiprazole for anxiety an intriguing avenue of exploration.