Lung cancer and lung transplantation: a review

Lung Transplantation in Patients with Previous or Unknown Oncological Disease: Evaluation of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

The accurate selection of the recipient is a crucial aspect in the field of lung transplantation (LTX), especially if patients were previously affected by oncological disease. The aim of this bicentric retrospective study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in patients with previous oncological disease or unknown neoplasia found on native lungs submitted to LTX, compared to a control group. A total of 433 patients were included in the analysis, 31 with malignancies (Group 1) and 402 without neoplastic disease (Group 2). The two groups were compared in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. Patients in Group 1 were older (median age 58 years vs. 50 years, p = 0.039) and mostly affected by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (55% vs. 40% p = 0.002). Even though in Group 1 a lower rate of late post-operative complications was found (23% vs. 45%, p = 0.018), the median overall survival (OS) was lower compared to the control group (10 months vs. 29 months, p = 0.015). LTX represents a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease and a history of neoplastic disease. However, every case should be carefully debated in a multidisciplinary setting, considering oncological (histology, stage, and proper disease free-interval) and clinical factors (patient's age and comorbidities). A scrupulous post-transplant follow-up is especially mandatory in those cases.

Donor/recipient origin of lung cancer after lung transplantation by DNA short tandem repeat analysis

Background

Lung cancer is more common in posttransplant recipients than in the general population. The objective of this study was to examine the chimerism donor/recipient cell origin of graft cancer in recipients of lung transplant.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted at Foch Hospital for all lung transplantations from 1989 to 2020. Short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) analysis, the gold standard technique for chimerism quantification, was used to determine the donor/recipient cell origin of lung cancers in transplant patients.

Results

Fourteen (1.4%) of the 1,026 patients were found to have graft lung cancer after lung transplantation, and one developed two different lung tumors in the same lobe. Among the 15 lung tumors, 10 (67%) presented with adenocarcinoma, four (27%) with squamous cell carcinoma and one with small cell lung cancer. STR analysis showed that the origin of the cancer was the donor in 10 patients (71%), the recipient in three patients (21%), and was undetermined in one patient. Median time to diagnosis was 62 months.

Conclusion

The prevalence of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients is very low. However, the results of our study showed heterogeneity of genetic alterations, with 21% being of recipient origin. Our results highlight the importance of donor selection and medical supervision after lung transplantation.

Lung Cancer in Lung Transplant Recipients: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics and Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate clinical and radiologic characteristics of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients and evaluate the treatment course and prognosis.

METHODS

The study included 448 patients who underwent lung transplant between 2005 and 2021. All patients had pretransplant chest computed tomography (CT), 429 patients had posttransplant CT, whereas 19 had no posttransplant CT (median number of posttransplant CT, 6; range, 0-24). Medical records of these patients were reviewed to identify patients who developed lung cancer after lung transplant. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography/CT at the time of lung cancer diagnoses were reviewed to obtain imaging features. Demographics, tumor histology, stages, and survival were compared using Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Among 448 lung transplant recipients with a median follow-up of 71.3 months after lung transplant, 15 patients (3.3%) developed posttransplant lung cancer (13 unilateral, 2 bilateral; 10 men, 5 women; median age, 63.1 years; median time from transplantation to cancer diagnosis, 3.1 years). Twelve cancers were in native lung, and 3 were in transplanted lung. The incidence of lung cancer was higher in single lung transplant recipients than in bilateral lung transplant recipients (10.3% vs 0.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Imaging manifestations varied according to tumor stages. Among 12 patients treated for lung cancer, 2 patients developed posttreatment acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median survival from cancer diagnosis of cancer was 6.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant lung cancer was noted in 3% of lung transplant recipients and was more common in unilateral transplant recipients. The prognosis upon diagnosis was poor with rapid clinical deterioration and serious posttreatment complications.

Current and future role of double-lung transplantation for bilateral lung cancer

Technological advances have progressively enhanced the survival rate of lung transplant recipients and expanded its indications for various diseases, including the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, lung cancer constituted a mere 0.1% of the indications for lung transplantation over the past two decades. This statistic has remained stagnant, and numerous lung cancer patients continue to be excluded from lung transplantation candidacy. Contrary to the general exclusion of lung cancer patients from transplantation, the post-transplant survival rate for these patients is not inferior to that of patients with non-cancerous diseases. Furthermore, lung transplantation may offer curative treatment for patients with bilateral lung cancer whose respiratory insufficiency has advanced independently of cancer progression. This review aims to elucidate and examine the role of double lung transplantation (DLT) in bilateral lung cancer. We summarize the established indications for lung transplantation, appropriate histologic or molecular subtypes of lung cancer for transplantation, technical advances to minimize recurrence, post-DLT survival outcomes for lung cancer patients, and related translational research. We suggest that although DLT for bilateral lung cancer presents challenges, it may be considered a potential treatment option in select circumstances.

Management of Native Lung Malignancy in a Lung Transplant Recipient

A 75-year-old male patient with a history of previous right lung transplant presented with left upper lobe squamous cell carcinoma. Endobronchial ultrasound and positron emission tomography displayed no mediastinal lymphadenopathy. A ventilation-perfusion scan displayed minimal perfusion to the native lung. Left robot-assisted lysis of adhesions, decortication, left upper lobectomy, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy were performed. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Final pathology displayed pT2a, n0, m0. Lobectomy is a safe and efficient treatment of native lung malignancy in the setting of previous lung transplant with minimally functioning native lung.

Increased Tumor Intrinsic Growth Potential and Decreased Immune Function Orchestrate the Progression of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

The overall 5-year survival of lung cancer was reported to be only ~15%, with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) as the main pathological subtype. Before developing into invasive stages, LUAD undergoes pre-invasive stages of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), where surgical resection gives an excellent 5-year survival rate. Given the dramatic decline of prognosis from pre-invasive to invasive stages, a deeper understanding of key molecular changes driving the progression of LUAD is highly needed.

Methods

In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing on surgically resected 24 AIS, 74 MIA, 99 LUAD specimens, and their adjacent paired normal tissues. Survival data were obtained by follow-up after surgery. Key molecular events were found by comparing the gene expression profiles of tumors with different stages. Finally, to measure the level of imbalance between tumor intrinsic growth potential and immune microenvironment, a tumor progressive (TP) index was developed to predict tumor progression and patients’ survival outcome and validated by external datasets.

Results

As tumors progressed to more invasive stages, they acquired higher growth potential, mutational frequency of tumor suppressor genes, somatic copy number alterations, and tumor mutation burden, along with suppressed immune function. To better predict tumor progression and patients’ outcome, TP index were built to measure the imbalance between tumor intrinsic growth potential and immune microenvironment. Patients with a higher TP index had significantly worse recurrence-free survival [Hazard ratio (HR), 10.47; 95% CI, 3.21–34.14; p < 0.0001] and overall survival (OS) [Hazard ratio (HR), 4.83e8; 95% CI, 0–Inf; p = 0.0013]. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD dataset for validation and found that patients with a higher TP index had significantly worse OS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.83–1.45; p = 0.048), demonstrating the prognostic value of the TP index for patients with LUAD.

Conclusions

The imbalance of tumor intrinsic growth potential and immune function orchestrate the progression of LUAD, which can be measured by TP index. Our study provided new insights into predicting survival of patients with LUAD and new target discovery for LUAD through assessing the imbalance between tumor intrinsic growth potential and immune function.

Emerging Paradigms in Bioengineering the Lungs

In end-stage lung diseases, the shortage of donor lungs for transplantation and long waiting lists are the main culprits in the significantly increasing number of patient deaths. New strategies to curb this issue are being developed with the help of recent advancements in bioengineering technology, with the generation of lung scaffolds as a steppingstone. There are various types of lung scaffolds, namely, acellular scaffolds that are developed via decellularization and recellularization techniques, artificial scaffolds that are synthesized using synthetic, biodegradable, and low immunogenic materials, and hybrid scaffolds which combine the advantageous properties of materials in the development of a desirable lung scaffold. There have also been advances in the design of bioreactors in terms of providing an optimal regenerative environment for the maturation of functional lung tissue over time. In this review, the emerging paradigms in the field of lung tissue bioengineering will be discussed.

Lung cancer in recipients after lung transplant: single-centre experience and literature review

Introduction

Lung cancer is a major challenge facing modern medicine. It is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Little is known of the incidence, prevalence and disease characteristics in lung transplant recipients, a population unique in its vulnerability and exposure to carcinogenic risk factors. We aimed to elaborate these characteristics of lung cancer in our population through a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institution’s 8-year experience with lung transplantation and searched for patients with a post-transplant diagnosis of lung cancer, neoplasia or mass. We focused on patient demographics, indication for transplant, smoking history, stage at diagnosis, location of the tumour, length of time between transplant and diagnosis, the treatment offered and length of time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis standard Kaplan-Meier method was conducted from the date of cancer diagnosis to death from all-cause mortality or last follow-up as of August 2021.

Results

We identified 24 patients with de novo lung cancer postlung transplant in 905 recipients. More patients with an underlying diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis developed lung cancer. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and three had small cell lung cancer. The remaining native lung was involved most in single lung recipients with 17 patients. Patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer had a mean survival of 17.6 months after diagnosis.

Discussion

The incidence rate of lung cancer in our cohort was higher than reported for smokers from the general population in previous studies. In this study, we compare our findings with available literature. We also explore screening strategies, treatment modalities, survival and postulated mechanisms for the development of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients.

Pulmonary fibrosis combined with lung cancer following lung transplantation: should we do more?

Currently, lung transplantation is the standard of care for patients with end-stage lung disease, with interstitial lung disease (ILD) being the most common reason in the recent years In the other hand, in cases where stage II and III lung cancer have been identified following lung transplantation, long-term survival outcomes are poor when compared to lung cancer patients that have not received a lung transplant because the use of immunosuppressant and the problem of rejection and infection and the treatment of recurrence and so on. However, there is no statistical difference observed in stage I (pT1N0M0) patients. In this paper we report about a patient with ILD receiving left lung transplantation in the early time. A lesion of the right lung which was considered the normal ILD tissue and without enough attention. Post-transplant it showed progress and finally the whole right lung (native lung) was occupied by the tumor. Some ground glass changes could also be found in the transplanted lung several months later. A secondary lung transplant was performed for this patient, and there has been no postoperative recurrence thus far. For lung transplant patients with high-risk factors, effective surveillance methods are required for the early detection of lung cancer.

Incidental Lung Cancer of Explanted Lungs from Lung Transplant Recipients: Incidence, Characteristics, and 5-Year Survival

PURPOSE

Recent history of malignancy without 5-year disease-free interval is an absolute contraindication for lung transplantation (LTx). However, in rare cases, lung cancer may be incidentally diagnosed in the explanted lung of recipients. We evaluated the prevalence, 5-year survival, and prognosis of incidental lung cancer after LTx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent LTx at Severance Hospital between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2019 were reviewed. Patients with incidental lung cancer were included, and those with histologically proven pre-transplant lung cancer were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 247 patients who underwent LTx, 6 (2.4%) were diagnosed with incidental lung cancer. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was the underlying lung disease in all patients. The median interval from the last preoperative computed tomography (CT) screening to LTx was 26 days. The most common histological type of incidental lung cancer was adenocarcinoma (n=4, 66.7%). All Stage IV cases were misdiagnosed as fibrosis on preoperative chest CT. Patients with incidental lung cancer showed lower 5-year survival than those without malignancy (median survival: 8.5 months vs. not reached, p=0.047, respectively). Patients with Stage III or IV demonstrated lower 5-year survival than those with Stage I or II and those without malignancy (median survival: 5 months, 19 months, and not reached, respectively, p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary preoperative screening and serial imaging studies within short intervals are required to differentiate lung malignancy from fibrotic foci. Furthermore, active pathologic examination of suspicious lung lesions is required in patients at high risk for lung cancer.

Primary lung carcinoma in cystic fibrosis: A case report and literature review

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have increased life span because of improved care over last 50 years. With increasing survival, predisposition of cancer may become evident. We have observed increase risk of gastrointestinal tract cancer, testicular cancer and lymphoid leukemia. Lung cancer in patients with CF is rare. Our patient developed chronic respiratory failure due to CF related bronchiectasis. Patient had progressive disease despite optimum treatment, requiring lung transplantation. Pathology of explant lung showed focus of invasive adenocarcinoma of lung origin. Patient had no evidence of lung carcinoma recurrence in one year. To our knowledge this is the fourth reported lung cancer case in a patient with CF.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of primary lung cancer in recipients of lung transplant

Background Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end stage lung disease. There may be a higher incidence of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients, and these cancers tend to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage. There is very little data on the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lesions in the native lung in lung-transplant recipients. Patients and methods A retrospective chart review of all patients who have undergone lung transplantation and were treated with SBRT for lung cancer in the native lung in the Davidoff Cancer Center was performed. Results Four patients who were treated with SBRT to a total of 5 lesions were included. Two patients were treated without histological confirmation of malignancy. All cases were discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board before being referred for radiotherapy. Standard SBRT dosing was used. Responses were assessed by imaging. Three lesions exhibited a complete response and two lesions had a partial response. The patients who had partial responses developed distant metastases and died shortly. No patient developed measurable toxicity. Conclusions SBRT is effective and safe for the management of lung cancer in lung-transplant patients. Standard dose and fractionation can be used.

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor After Lung Transplant-A Rare and Aggressive Complication: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Malignant diseases are well-known complications after lung transplantation (LT). Among these, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare neoplasm with a not well-known and often aggressive biological behavior.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We hereby describe 2 cases of cystic fibrosis patients who underwent bilateral sequential LT (BSLT) complicated by IMT.

RESULTS

A 26-year-old man presented a right endobronchial lesion 6 months after BSLT. Two consecutive fiber bronchoscopic biopsies showed granulation tissue. For the persistent lesion growth, the patient underwent a transthoracic biopsy showing histologic diagnosis of IMT. Therefore, he underwent to right pneumonectomy that was unfortunately complicated after 6 months with a late bronchopleural fistula and empyema with exitus 6 months later. A 31-year-old woman 1 year after BSLT presented with a left voluminous pleural-parenchymal lesion; the histologic examination after biopsy revealed an IMT. She underwent a removal of the lesion with a macroscopic R0 resection. Histologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic examinations showed a strong overexpression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase requiring biological adjuvant therapies; however, the patient refused it. Four years later, she presented a recurrence treated with debulking procedure and adjuvant radiotherapy. At last follow-up, the patient was alive with stable disease and optimal graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Although IMT is a rare complication after lung transplant, to obtain a careful diagnosis, an early and aggressive treatment is mandatory.

Risk of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients in the United States

Lung transplant recipients have an increased risk of lung cancer that is poorly understood. Prior studies are largely descriptive and single-center, and have not examined risk factors or outcomes in this population. This registry-linkage study utilized matched transplant and cancer registry data from 17 US states/regions during 1987-2012. We used standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) to compare incidence with the general population, Poisson models to identify lung cancer risk factors, and Cox models to compare survival after diagnosis. Lung cancer risk was increased among lung recipients (SIR 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-5.5). Those with single lung transplant had 13-fold (95% CI 11-15) increased risk in the native lung. Native lung cancer risk factors included age, prior smoking, time since transplant, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Compared with cases in the general population, lung cancers in recipients were more frequently localized stage (P = .02) and treated surgically (P = .05). However, recipients had higher all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.52-2.37) and cancer-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.18). In conclusion, lung cancer risk is increased after lung transplant, especially in the native lung of single lung recipients. Traditional risk factors are associated with lung cancer in these patients. Lung cancer survival is worse among lung recipients despite earlier diagnosis.

Metachronous Pulmonary Neoplasms in Lung Transplantation-When They Arise in the Donor Lung: A Case Report

Lung cancer (LC) is uncommon among lung transplant recipients, being most often described in the native lung of single-lung transplant recipients. Its appearance in the transplanted lung is a very uncommon phenomenon, in which donor and recipient factors appear to be involved. We present a case of 2 distinct metachronous lung neoplasms diagnosed in the transplanted lung of a non-smoker patient with progressive massive silicosis (PMS), who underwent left unipulmonary transplantation at 39 years. The donor was a smoker and thoracic computed tomography (CT) performed before the organ collection showed no abnormalities. Thirty months after transplantation, a new node with significant avidity in positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was diagnosed in the upper left lobe (ULL). The Thoracic Surgery team chose to proceed directly to surgery with atypical resection of the nodule. Anatomopathologic study revealed an epidermoid carcinoma (pT1aNx). Multidisciplinary group decided clinical surveillance; however, 2 years later, the appearance of 2 new nodules in the ULL (PET-CT positive) was observed. It was again decided to proceed to the surgery with a second atypical resection. The anatomopathologic study of one nodule revealed pulmonary adenocarcinoma (pT1aNx), and the other was compatible with epidermoid carcinoma (pT1aNx). One month later, the patient was hospitalized with a pulmonary abscess and posteriorly developed a probable acute allograft rejection, eventually dying at the age of 44, 51 months after transplantation. This case raises relevant questions regarding the donor selection criteria and the approach to LC diagnosed in the post-transplantation period.

Combination of computer extracted shape and texture features enables discrimination of granulomas from adenocarcinoma on chest computed tomography

Differentiation between benign and malignant nodules is a problem encountered by radiologists when visualizing computed tomography (CT) scans. Adenocarcinomas and granulomas have a characteristic spiculated appearance and may be fluorodeoxyglucose avid, making them difficult to distinguish for human readers. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate whether a combination of radiomic texture and shape features from noncontrast CT scans can enable discrimination between granulomas and adenocarcinomas. Our study is composed of CT scans of 195 patients from two institutions, one cohort for training ([Formula: see text]) and the other ([Formula: see text]) for independent validation. A set of 645 three-dimensional texture and 24 shape features were extracted from CT scans in the training cohort. Feature selection was employed to identify the most informative features using this set. The top ranked features were also assessed in terms of their stability and reproducibility across the training and testing cohorts and between scans of different slice thickness. Three different classifiers were constructed using the top ranked features identified from the training set. These classifiers were then validated on the test set and the best classifier (support vector machine) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77.8%.

Devastating fast-growing lung cancer after single lung transplantation

Patients receiving lung transplantation are at increasing risk for the development of cancer due to the administration of immunosuppressive drugs. We hereby report the case of a patient with a devastating fast-growing lung cancer after single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis.

The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine

The ability to replace organs and tissues on demand could save or improve millions of lives each year globally and create public health benefits on par with curing cancer. Unmet needs for organ and tissue preservation place enormous logistical limitations on transplantation, regenerative medicine, drug discovery, and a variety of rapidly advancing areas spanning biomedicine. A growing coalition of researchers, clinicians, advocacy organizations, academic institutions, and other stakeholders has assembled to address the unmet need for preservation advances, outlining remaining challenges and identifying areas of underinvestment and untapped opportunities. Meanwhile, recent discoveries provide proofs of principle for breakthroughs in a family of research areas surrounding biopreservation. These developments indicate that a new paradigm, integrating multiple existing preservation approaches and new technologies that have flourished in the past 10 years, could transform preservation research. Capitalizing on these opportunities will require engagement across many research areas and stakeholder groups. A coordinated effort is needed to expedite preservation advances that can transform several areas of medicine and medical science.

Development of Allograft Cancer after Lung Transplantation: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

In contrast to skin cancer and lymphoproliferative disorders, de-novo lung allograft cancer is seldom reported after lung transplantation.

CASE REPORT

A 19-year-old patient with severe pulmonary hypertension listed urgently for lung transplantation underwent successful bilateral lung transplant procedure receiving lungs from a 55-year-old donor with a smoking history of 30 pack years. After 3.5 years of lung transplantation, a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma in the left lung allograft was diagnosed. Extended (intra-pericardial) left pneumonectomy was successfully performed, but the patient died a few weeks later due to acute respiratory distress syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Usage of extended criteria donors seems a successful strategy to overcome shortage of donor lungs by the increasing number of lung transplant candidates. However, this approach might increase the risk of novel development of lung allograft cancer, a potential fatal complication that must be considered during follow-up of lung transplant recipients.

Histopathological Study of Cyclosporine Pulmonary Toxicity in Rats

Cyclosporine is considered one of the common worldwide immunosuppressive drugs that are used for allograft rejection prevention. However, articles that address adverse effects of cyclosporine use on the vital organs such as lung are still few. This study aims to investigate pulmonary toxic effect of cyclosporine in rats by assessment of pulmonary histopathological changes using light and electron microscope examination. Sixty male adult albino rats were divided into three groups; each group consists of twenty rats. The first received physiological saline while the second and third groups received 25 and 40 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine, respectively, by gastric gavage for forty-five days. Cyclosporine reduced the lung and body weight with shrinkage or pyknotic nucleus of pneumocyte type II, degeneration of alveoli and interalveolar septum beside microvilli on the alveolar surface, emphysema, inflammatory cellular infiltration, pulmonary blood vessels congestion, and increase of fibrous tissues in the interstitial tissues and around alveoli with negative Periodic Acid-Schiff staining. Prolonged use of cyclosporine induced pulmonary ultrastructural and histopathological changes with the lung and body weight reduction depending on its dose.

Case report: combined small cell lung cancer in a lung transplant recipient

Lung transplantation confers an increased risk of lung cancer, especially for single lung transplant recipients, due to both the epidemiologic risk factors associated with the patient population and the posttransplantation immunosuppression required. We report what we believe to be the first case of combined small cell lung carcinoma identified in the native lung of a single lung transplant recipient. Combined small cell lung cancer is an increasingly recognized subtype of small cell carcinoma, and its possible presence is an important consideration in the interpretation of fine-needle aspiration biopsies. In our case, initial fine-needle aspiration suggested squamous cell carcinoma, and it was only after lobectomy that the diagnosis of small cell carcinoma was made. The case highlights the increased risk of malignancy in lung transplant recipients and suggests a role for adaptation of lung cancer screening guidelines to address this high-risk population.

Prevalence and outcome of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant is the only available therapy for patients with advanced lung disease. The goal of this study was to examine the prevalence, origin, management and outcome of lung cancer in recipients of lung transplant at our institution.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of all lung transplantations in our institution from January 1990 until June 2012.

RESULTS

The prevalence of lung cancer in the explanted lung was 6 (1.2%) of 462 and all cases were in subjects with lung fibrosis. All 4 subjects with lymph node involvement died of causes related to the malignancy. Nine (1.9%) of 462 patients were found to have bronchogenic carcinoma after lung transplant. The most common location was in the native lung in recipients of a single lung transplant (6 out of 9 patients). In one case, the tumor originated in the allograft and was potentially donor related. The median time to diagnosis after lung transplant was 28 months with a range from 9 months to 10 years. Median survival was 8 months, with tumors involving lymph nodes or distant metastases associated with a markedly worse prognosis (median survival 7 months) than stage I disease (median survival 27 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients is low. Using accepted donor screening criteria, donor derived malignancy is exceptionally rare. While stage I disease is associated with improved survival in this cohort, survival is still not comparable to that of the general population, likely influenced by the need for aggressive immune suppression.

Primary non-small cell lung cancer in a transplanted lung treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. A case study

The first case of primary lung cancer in a transplanted lung was described in 2001. Since then, only 5 cases of lung cancer in donated lung have been reported. We present one more patient with non-small cell cancer in the transplanted lung treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. In most cases of primary lung cancer in transplanted lung, rapid progression of the cancer was reported. Occurrence of the locoregional failure in our case could be explained by factors related to the treatment protocol and also to underlying immunosuppression.

Y-chromosome status identification suggests a recipient origin of posttransplant non-small cell lung carcinomas: chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis

Owing to the need of lifelong immunosuppression, solid-organ transplant recipients are known to have an increased risk of posttransplant malignancies including lung cancer. Posttransplant neoplastic transformation of donor-derived cells giving rise to hematopoietic malignancies, Kaposi sarcoma, and basal cell carcinoma in nongraft tissues has been reported. The goal of this study was to assess the cell origin (donor versus recipient derived) of posttransplant non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) in kidney and heart transplant recipients. An institutional database search identified 2557 kidney and heart transplant recipients in 8 consecutive years. Among this cohort, 20 (0.8%) renal and 18 (0.7%) heart transplant recipients developed NSCLC. The study cohort comprised 6 of 38 NSCLCs arising in donor-recipient sex-mismatched transplant patients. The tumor cell origin was evaluated by chromogenic in situ hybridization with Y-chromosome probe on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Y-chromosome was identified in 97% ± 1% (range from 92% to 99%) of all types of nucleated cells in male control tissues. In all 5 NSCLCs from male recipients of female donor organ, Y-chromosome was identified in 97% ± 2% (range from 92% to 100%) of tumor cells, statistically equivalent to normal control (P < .001). No Y-chromosome was identified in NSCLC cells from a female recipient of male kidney. These findings suggest a recipient derivation of NSCLC arising in kidney and heart transplant recipients. A combination of histologic evaluation and chromogenic in situ hybridization with Y-chromosome analysis allows reliable determination of tissue origin in sex-mismatched solid-organ transplant recipients and may aid in management of posttransplant malignancy in such cases.

Malignancies incidentally detected at lung transplantation: radiologic and pathologic features

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the CT-pathologic features of cancer incidentally detected at lung transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our lung transplant registry was reviewed over 7 years for incidental malignancy. Patient demographics, diffuse lung disease, surgical procedure, histopathology, and chest CT were recorded. We correlated lesion size, morphology, multiplicity, and location with surgical and pathology reports and histopathology. Cancers were pathologically staged.

RESULTS

Of 759 lung transplant recipients, cancer was incidentally detected in 22 (2.9%). Half (11 of 258) or 4.3% were detected within the past 2 years. Four patients had a history of treated malignancy, and three had recurrence. Patients had emphysema (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) (n = 10), fibrosis (n = 10), or combined COPD and fibrosis (n = 2). Histopathology revealed 13 solitary lung carcinomas, four multifocal adenocarcinomas, three metastases, and two lymphoproliferative diseases. Lung cancer (n = 17) stages were I or II (n = 13), IIIA (n = 2), or IV (n = 2). Metastases (n = 3) and lymphoproliferative disease (n = 2) represented advanced disease. The interval between CT and surgery was a mean of 4 months. CT-positive cases (n = 10) represented lung cancer (n = 9) and posttrans-plantation lymphoproliferative disease (n = 1). Cases with no CT findings of malignancy (n = 12) included lung cancer (n = 8), metastases (n = 3), and lymphoma (n = 1). Ten cases (45%) had other histologically benign CT abnormalities that mimicked cancer.

CONCLUSION

Detection of incidental malignancy at lung transplantation has increased over the past 2 years. Malignancies were typically stage I or II lung cancers that were occult or indeterminate on CT. Diffuse lung disease, multiple CT abnormalities, and a delay between CT and transplantation compromise the preoperative diagnosis of cancer.

Lung cancer in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients diagnosed during or after lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an accepted therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease and offers a major survival benefit in selected patients. The most important indications are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis besides cystic fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension. The incidence of lung cancer in patients after Ltx is 20–25 times higher than in the general population. Diagnosis is often difficult in IPF patients because of the diffuse lung abnormalities due to the underlying fibrosis. Moreover, the lung cancer may mimic a pulmonary infection. Symptoms are often aspecific, diagnosis is difficult, and prognosis is extremely poor. We describe three patients who were transplanted for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and who developed a primary lung cancer.

Lung cancer in lung transplant recipients: experience of a tertiary hospital and literature review

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a viable therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease and is being increasingly performed worldwide. The incidence of lung cancer after lung transplantation has increased concomitantly, although data are still sparse.

METHODS

The computerized medical records of the Pulmonary Institute of a tertiary care medical center were searched for patients who underwent lung transplantation from 1997 to 2009 and acquired lung cancer postoperatively. The prevalence, potential contributing factors, and outcome of bronchogenic cancer were determined, and the medical literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

Bronchogenic cancer developed in 7 of the 290 lung transplant recipients (2.4%). All had received a single lung transplant and in most cases, the cancer developed in the native lung. These findings were similar to reports in the literature. The indication for transplantation was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/interstitial lung disease. All had a history of smoking. The average interval from transplantation to development of lung cancer was 5 years (range 1-9). Five patients had stage 4 cancer at diagnosis and 2 had stage 1. Six patients died from 10 days to 1 year after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Lung transplantation is associated with a relatively high prevalence of bronchogenic cancer, particularly in the native lung, in patients with primary chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and a history of smoking. The cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor outcome. Efforts to improve screening are recommended, as aggressive management and treatment may be beneficial for earlier stage disease.

[Bronchiolar-alveolar carcinoma: From concept to innovative therapeutic strategies]

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is a primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC) developped from the terminal respiratory unit. Its restrictive definition adopted by the 1999 WHO pathological classification needs a complete tumor resection to exclude any signs of histological invasion. Although IIIB-IV tumors were excluded from the strict WHO definition of BAC, the first international workshop on BAC in 2004 had focussed on the need to include in the same spectrum of disease pure BAC and ADC with BAC feature (ADC-WBF). BAC and ADC-WBF affect more frequently women, non-smokers and Asian people than other non-small cell carcinoma. Their predominant lepidic and aerogenous tumor progression results in a frequent pneumonic, multifocal or diffuse presentation and explains why death is more frequently related to bilateral pulmonary involvement than extrathoracic metastasis. Natural history is slower and prognosis better than for other ADC. Within this entity, there are different cytological subtypes: mucinous, non-mucinous and mixed and according to them different clinical and biological phenotypes, with different sensitivity to therapeutic agents. At present, the diagnosis, the staging and the therapeutic strategy does not differ from that of non-small lung carcinoma cells. In localized forms, surgical resection remains the best therapeutic option for localized tumors. In diffuse forms, high frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression on tumor cells and its gene amplification and/or mutation as well as a particular sensitivity of this entity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors offer new strategy of therapeutical management in patients with non-resectable tumor. However, the place of chemotherapy has recently been revisited in this entity known until now as chemoresistant tumors. The results are being evaluated. It is necessary to continue therapeutic trials to determine criteria for choosing a first-line TKI or conventional chemotherapy in that entity. Cytological subtype will probably have an important role to play in this choice.

Characteristics of thoracic malignancies that occur after solid-organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic immunosuppression after solid-organ transplantation is associated with increased risk of developing malignancies. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical characteristics and the outcome of thoracic malignancies in patients who have undergone solid-organ transplantation.

METHODS

Among a cohort of 2831 patients who received a transplant at our institution and were followed between 1984 and 2009, 24 patients (0.85%) developed thoracic malignancies. Risk factors for lung cancer, as well as demographic, cancer, and transplantation characteristics, were analyzed. Survival data were also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included (21 men, median age 61.7 years). Twenty-two patients were smokers. The most frequent histologic types were squamous cell carcinoma (n = 11, 46%) and adenocarcinoma (n = 9, 37%). The median time period between transplantation and diagnosis of lung cancer was 6.6 years. Ten lung malignancies occurred after kidney transplantation (0.5%), eight after liver transplantation (1.3%), and six after heart transplantation (2.8%). Seven patients underwent surgery, three had radiotherapy, four had chemotherapy, and six had multimodal treatment. The median survival time was 1.5 years, ranging from 6 months for stage IV to 3.7 years for stage I.

CONCLUSION

Solid-organ transplantation is associated with a high risk of lung cancer and may have an important synergetic part with other risk factors for lung cancer (tobacco). However, survival rates from lung cancer in our study population are similar to those of nontransplanted patients. In addition, surgery can result in favorable survival results.

[Bronchogenic carcinoma after lung transplantation: a case report and literature review]

背景与目的

肺移植是治疗终末期肺部疾病的有效手段，然而对肺移植术后肺癌却缺乏了解。我们通过对1例肺移植术后肺癌患者临床资料的报道，并结合相关文献复习，以提高对肺移植术后肺癌的认识、诊断及治疗水平。

方法

2007年5月我院为一例65岁、术前诊断为两肺特发性肺间质纤维化（idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, IPF）的男性患者在体外膜肺氧合（extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO）辅助下成功进行了右侧单肺移植，患者术后46 d恢复良好出院。术后免疫抑制方案为他克莫司（Tac）+吗替麦考酚酯（骁悉）+类固醇激素。出院后患者定期随访。

结果

在移植术后13个月随访确诊为非移植侧左肺小细胞肺癌伴多发骨转移。患者给予依托泊苷联合顺铂（EP方案）化疗4次症状有所缓解，患者在诊断肺癌后11个月死亡。

结论

肺移植术后肺癌严重影响移植患者远期存活，慢性阻塞性肺病（chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD）、IPF、吸烟史及免疫抑制剂等为其危险因素，为改善预后，需要早期诊断及早期治疗。