Phase II trial of S-1 as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Efficacy of S-1 after pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective multi-institutional analysis

Background

S‐1 and pemetrexed (PEM) are key treatments for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanism of anticancer activity of S‐1 and PEM is similar. Cross‐resistance between S‐1 and PEM is of concern. This exploratory study was designed to evaluate the treatment effect of S‐1 following PEM‐containing treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with advanced (c‐stage III or IV, UICC seventh edition) or recurrent NSCLC who received S‐1 monotherapy following the failure of previous PEM‐containing chemotherapy at six hospitals in Japan. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 53 NSCLC patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Forty‐six patients had adenocarcinoma (88.7%) and no patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty‐one patients (58.5%) received the standard S‐1 regimen and 18 patients (34.0%) received the modified S‐1 regimen. ORR was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00%–10.1%). Median TTF, PFS, and OS were 65, 84, and 385 days, respectively.

Conclusions

Although there were several limitations in this study, the ORR of S‐1 after PEM in patients with nonsquamous (non‐SQ) NSCLC was low compared to the historical control. One of the options in the future might be to avoid S‐1 treatment in PEM‐treated patients who need tumor shrinkage.

Oral Chemotherapy for Treatment of Lung Cancer

The global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery, particularly for patients with advanced lung cancer. While certain aspects of care can be safely omitted or delayed, systemic therapy plays an important role in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced lung cancer; limiting access to systemic therapy will compromise cancer-related outcomes. This can be at odds with strategies to mitigate risk of COVID-19 exposure, which include reducing hospital and clinic visits. One important strategy is implementation of oral cancer therapies. Many standard regimens require intravenous infusions but there are specific circumstances where an oral agent could be an acceptable alternative. Integrating oral therapeutics can permit patients to receive effective systemic treatment without the exposure risks associated with frequent infusions. Here, we review currently available oral cytotoxic agents with a potential role in the treatment of lung cancer.

A randomized, phase 2 study of deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, TAS-114, in combination with S-1 versus S-1 alone in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction TAS-114 is a potent inhibitor of deoxyuridine triphosphatase, which is a gatekeeper protein preventing uracil and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) misincorporation into DNA. TAS-114 has been suggested to enhance the antitumor activity of 5-FU. This randomized, phase 2 study investigated TAS-114 plus S-1 (TAS-114/S-1) vs. S-1 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, previously treated with ≥ 2 regimens, were randomized 1:1 to receive TAS-114 (400 mg)/S-1 (30 mg/m²) or S-1 (30 mg/m²). Progression-free survival (PFS, independent central review) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Results In total, 127 patients received treatment. Median PFS was 3.65 and 4.17 months in the TAS-114/S-1 and S-1 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–1.88; P = 0.2744). DCR was similar between groups (TAS-114/S-1 80.3%, S-1 75.9%) and median OS was 7.92 and 9.82 months for the TAS-114/S-1 and S-1 groups, respectively (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.80–2.14; P = 0.1431). The ORR was higher in the TAS-114/S-1 group than the S-1 group (19.7% vs. 10.3%), and more patients with tumor shrinkage were observed in the TAS-114/S-1 group. Incidence rates of anemia, skin toxicities, and Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were higher in the TAS-114/S-1 group compared with the monotherapy group. Conclusions Although the TAS-114/S-1 combination improved the response rate, this did not translate into improvements in PFS. Clinical Trial Registration No. NCT02855125 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on 4 August 2016.

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus S-1 in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

About one-third of the lung tumors are staged as locally advanced at the time of initial diagnosis; however, the optimal induction treatment before curative resection has not been elucidated. To date, the evidence regarding the preoperative apatinib plus S-1 for locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma is scarce.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 29-year-old female was admitted because of persistent cough, sputum, and chest distress for 2 months.

DIAGNOSES

Primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (cT3N2M0, IIIB) with unknown driver gene mutation status.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient had received 4 months of neoadjuvant therapy using oral apatinib (425 mg daily) plus S-1 (60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval), followed by anatomical lobectomy with curative intent. Adjuvant apatinib (425 mg daily for a month, and 250 mg daily for another month) plus S-1 at the same dosage were administered for 2 months. Thereafter, maintenance of low-dose S-1 monotherapy (40 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval) was continued for 6 months.

OUTCOMES

The adverse events were tolerable and well-controlled. A postoperative recurrence-free survival for 2 years and a half up to now was indicated.

LESSONS

Preoperative apatinib plus S-1 showed efficacy in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. However, high-quality trials are warranted before the recommendation of this therapeutic regimen.

First-in-human phase 1 study of novel dUTPase inhibitor TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Background This first-in-human phase 1 study assessed the safety of TAS-114, a novel deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, combined with S-1 to determine its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Methods In this dose-escalation study with a 3 + 3 design, TAS-114 and S-1 were concurrently administered orally under fasting conditions at 5-240 mg/m² and 30-36 mg/m², respectively, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated. Results Seventy-six patients were enrolled. The MTD and RD were TAS-114 200 mg/m² plus S-1 36 mg/m² and TAS-114 240 mg/m² plus S-1 30 mg/m², respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events were anemia, lymphocytopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, decreased appetite, rash, nausea, and pigmentation disorder. Partial response (PR) was observed in 10 patients (non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], n = 5; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, n = 2; gastric cancer, n = 2; gallbladder cancer, n = 1). Of these, four patients achieved PR despite prior treatment history with S-1. Patients administered TAS-114 exhibited linear PK and CYP3A4 induction, with no effect on the PK of S-1. Conclusion TAS-114 plus S-1 showed tolerable, safe, and potentially effective results. To confirm safety and efficacy, two phase 2 studies are ongoing in NSCLC and gastric cancer patients. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01610479 ) .

A retrospective study of concurrent radiotherapy plus S-1 for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We investigated the efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy plus S-1 (CRS) for treating unresectable stage III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ANSCLC).Seventy five ANSCLC patients were included in this retrospective study. Of those, 40 patients were assigned to an intervention group, and received S-1 (orally at 40 mg/m) twice daily for 14 consecutive days. Then, concurrent radiotherapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions, 5 times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The other 35 patients were assigned to a control group, and underwent concurrent radiotherapy (the same as the intervention group) and cisplatin (60 mg/m on day 1 (CRC). The outcome measurements included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.The 3-year ORR was 60.7% and 43.9% for intervention group and control group, respectively (P = .031). The median OS was 34.1 months and 25.3 months in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = .041). The median PFS was 31.5 months for intervention group, while it was 22.4 months for control group (P = .048). No significant difference in toxicity was found between the 2 groups.The results demonstrated that the efficacy of CRS was superior to the CRC in ANSCLC patients with similar toxicity.

Phase II clinical trial of S-1 plus oral leucovorin in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, has potent antitumor activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meanwhile, leucovorin enhances the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil by inhibiting thymidylate synthase. Therefore, this phase II clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus leucovorin combination therapy for previously treated patients with NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were prospectively enrolled if they received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. S-1 (40-60 mg) and leucovorin (25mg) were administered together orally twice per day for 7 consecutive days followed by 7 days of rest. This 2-week cycle was repeated for a maximum of 25 cycles until the onset of disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Endpoints included objective tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Among 33 patients, 6 (18.2%), 14 (42.4%), and 11 (33.3%) had partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 3.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. The common grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis (18.2%), anorexia (12.1%), and neutropenia (9.1%). One patient had pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis, and another experienced paralytic ileus. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus leucovorin combination therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in previously treated patients with NSCLC.

Efficacy of S-1 plus nedaplatin compared to standard second-line chemotherapy in EGFR-negative lung adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line chemotherapy

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma that fail to respond to first-line chemotherapy and that do not involve epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, previous empirical analysis showed that a single second-line chemotherapy agent may be inadequate for the control of further tumor development. This study examines the combination of S-1 drugs and nedaplatin that has no cross-resistance to first-line treatments; 179 cases of IIIb-IV stage non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma that failed to respond to first-line chemotherapy were included, and these subjects did not have mutated EGFRs. In the present study, S-1 plus nedaplatin chemotherapy was better than standard second-line chemotherapy options in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma that did not involve EGFR mutations and that failed to respond to first-line chemotherapy. Additionally, the combination of S-1 and nedaplatin seemed to be well tolerated, making this chemotherapy technique a potentially strong candidate for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma.

Phase II trial of S-1 as third-line or further chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), receiving two or more prior chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day rest period. This treatment course was repeated until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2012, 45 patients were enrolled in this study. Of the 45 patients, 4 patients [8.9 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.6-17.2 %] exhibited a partial response and 24 patients (53.3 %) exhibited stable disease. The disease control rate was 62.2 % (95 % CI 48.1-76.4 %). Median progression-free survival was 71 days, and median survival time was 205 days. Four patients had grade 3 hematological toxicities, but toxicities of grade 4 were not observed in this study.

CONCLUSION

Although S-1 monotherapy as third-line treatment or beyond was well tolerated, the response rate for this regimen did not demonstrate sufficient activity for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Feasibility trial for adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin followed by single agent long-term administration of S-1 chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group Study 0809

BACKGROUND

We conducted a multicentre feasibility study for single agent long-term S-1 chemotherapy following docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with curatively resected stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients received three cycles of docetaxel (60 mg m(-2)) plus cisplatin (80 mg m(-2)) and then received S-1 (40 mg m(-2) twice daily) for 14 consecutive days with a 1-week rest for >6 months (maximum, 1 year). The primary end point was feasibility, which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed eight or more cycles of S-1 chemotherapy. If the lower 95% confidence interval (CI) of this proportion was 50% or more, then the treatment was considered as feasible. The sample size was set at 125 patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled, of whom 129 patients were eligible and assessable. In all, 109 patients (84.5%) completed 3 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 66 patients (51.2%, 95% CI: 42.5-59.8) completed 8 or more cycles of S-1 treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities during the S-1 chemotherapy included anaemia (7.3%), neutropaenia (3.7%), and anorexia (3.7%).

CONCLUSION

The toxicity level was acceptable, although the results did not meet our criterion for feasibility. Modification of the treatment schedule for S-1 chemotherapy might improve the treatment compliance.

Phase I/II study of amrubicin in combination with S-1 as second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutation

INTRODUCTION

Both amrubicin (Am) and S-1 are effective against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and preclinical studies have demonstrated that the effect of tegafur/uracil, the original compound of S-1, in combination with Am significantly inhibits tumor growth.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I/II study of Am and S-1 against pretreated NSCLC without EGFR mutation. We fixed the dose of S-1 at 40 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and escalated the Am dose in increments of 5 mg/m(2) from a starting dose of 30 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3 and repeated the cycle every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were registered. In phase I, at an Am dose of 35 mg/m(2)/day, three patients experienced grade 2 leukopenia during S-1 administration, and S-1 was withdrawn. Another patient developed grade 2 serum bilirubin in the first cycle. DLTs were observed in four of six patients at this dose level, and therefore, 30 mg/m(2)/day was set as the recommended dose for Am. Twenty patients received this recommended Am dose. Febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients, and one patient developed a grade 4 increase in serum creatinine. Grade 3 vomiting, infection, hypotension, and urinary retention were observed in one patient each, respectively. Other toxicities were mild, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Two patients showed a CR, three showed a PR, and the overall response rate was 25.0%. The median progression-free and the median survival times were 3.8 and 15.6 months, respectively, and the 1-year survival rate was 60%.

CONCLUSION

Am and S-1 every 4 weeks is an effective combination for pretreated NSCLC without EGFR mutation.

Phase II Study of S-1 Plus Either Irinotecan or Docetaxel for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with More Than Three Lines of Treatment

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a combination treatment of S-1 plus either irinotecan or docetaxel for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have already failed 3 or more lines of treatment.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective single center phase II study. The eligible patients received S-1 40 mg/m² twice a day orally on days 1 though 14 combined with irinotecan 150 mg/m²on D1 only or docetaxel 35 mg/m² on D1 and D8. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The choice between the two regimens was made at the discretion of the treating physician.

Results

A total of 14 patients participated in the study. There were 3 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 9 with adenocarcinoma, and 2 with NSCLC, NOS. Eight of the patients were male. There were 8 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) of 1, and 6 patients with an ECOG of 2. All the patients had already been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Out of the 14 patients, 10 received irinotecan and S-1 and the other 4 received docetaxel and S-1. Twelve patients had also received pemetrexed. Disappointingly, there were no response from 2 patients with a stable disease, and therefore, as per the protocol, we stopped the study early. With a median follow-up time of 49 months, the median survival time was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3 to 6.9 months).

Conclusion

S-1 containing doublets did not show activity in this population as a salvage treatment and further investigation cannot be recommended.