Local therapy with continued EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy as a treatment strategy in EGFR-mutant advanced lung cancers that have developed acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Appropriate delay of primary tumour radiotherapy may lead to better long-term overall survival for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs

PURPOSE

The most appropriate time of primary tumor radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) with EGFR-TKIs remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the time factor of primary tumor radiotherapy on long-term overall survival(OS)and provide a theoretical basis for further clinical research.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 238 patients with EGFR-TKIs and OS ≥ 12 months were statistically analysed. Patients were grouped: the D group without primary tumor radiotherapy and the R group with it.The R group were divided into three groups according to the interval between the start of EGFR-TKIs and the start of primary tumor radiotherapy: R0 - 30(<30 days), R30 - PD(≥ 30 days and disease stable), and RPD(radiotherapy after disease progression). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Exploratory landmark analyses were investigated.

RESULTS

The OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5 years for the R group and D group were 96.8%, 62.9%, 38.3%, 17.1%, and 95.6%, 37.7%, 21.8%, 2.9%, respectively; the corresponding MST was 29 months(95% CI: 24.3-33.7) for the R group and 22 months(95% CI: 20.4-23.6) for the D group (χ2 = 13.480, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that primary tumor radiotherapy was independent predictors of prolonged OS.Among the four groups, The R30 - PD appeared to have the best OS (D, χ2 = 19.307, p<0.001;R0 - 30, χ2 = 11.687, p = 0.01; RPD, χ2 = 4.086, p = 0.043). Landmark analyses(22 months) showed the R30 - PD group had a significant long-term OS.The incidence of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 was17.3%(n = 19)and radiation esophagitis ≥ grade 2 was observed in 32 patients(29.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that primary tumour radiotherapy may prolong long-term OS with acceptable toxicities. Appropriate delay(R30 - PD)of primary tumour radiotherapy may be the best choice.Premature radiotherapy(R0 - 30) and radiotherapy after disease progression (RPD)may not be reasonable for long-term OS.

The Role of Local Therapy for Oligo-Progressive Disease in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

We first described the role of local radiation therapy (LT) for oligoprogressive disease (OPD) on targeted therapy in 2012. Here, we present an updated and larger data set and extend the analysis beyond EGFR and ALK.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR/BRAF V600E mutations, or ALK/ROS1/RET rearrangements, who had OPD on respective tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) and treated with LT was performed. OPD was defined as disease progression on therapy in ≤5 sites. PFS1 (progression-free survival 1) was defined as time from initiation of TKI-containing regimen to the first course of LT for OPD. Subsequent PFS times (eg, PFS2, PFS3) were defined as time from prior LT to subsequent LT, switch of systemic therapy, death, or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first. Extended-PFS was defined as time from the first day of the first LT course to the day of change in systemic therapy, death, or loss to follow-up, whichever came first.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were identified. In 75.4% of the LT courses, a single lesion was treated. Median PFS1 was 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.7-13.1) and median Extended-PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.9-8.3). Extended-PFS was similar across different oncogenic drivers; 51.4% of patients who underwent LT to a single site had only 1 site on next disease progression.

Conclusions

LT is effective in prolonging treatment duration on TKI in oncogene-addicted NSCLC across multiple oncogenes.

Sequential Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Radical Surgery in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Sequential regimens in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can overcome tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and maximize clinical benefit. Patients with advanced NSCLC can achieve excellent tumor control after a period of EGFR-TKI treatment. Patients may benefit from additional local treatment, such as surgery or radiation therapy, once the tumor is under control. Here, we present a case of a patient with advanced oligometastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations who achieved downstaging through sequential EGFR-TKI-based precision medicine allowing resection of residual disease.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment beyond progression with prior immunotherapy in patients with driver-gene negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

No definite conclusion has yet to be reached for immunotherapy beyond progression(IBP) of first-line immunotherapy as the second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with negative driver genes. Therefore a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of IBP in this population and investigated whether the cycles best response and progressive mode of first-line immunotherapy could affect the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC whose response was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) after receiving a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy were retrospectively collected and the patients were assigned to the IBP and non-IBP groups. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated between the two groups. The survival effects of cycles best response and progressive mode of first-line immunotherapy were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Between January 2019 and January 2022, a total of 121 patients was evaluated as PD after first-line immunotherapy in our institution; 53 (43.8%) patients were included in the IBP group and 68 (56.2%) patients were included in the non-IBP group. The OS and PFS were no significantly different between the two groups in whole population. Further analysis revealed the OS was prolonged with the prolongation of first-line medication cycle. The median OS was 15.4m (15.4 vs 10.8 p=0.047) 16.1m (16.1 vs 10.8 p=0.039), 16.3m (16.3 vs 10.9 p=0.029) for patients with ≥4, ≥6, ≥8 cycles in first-line immunotherapy, respectively. The advantages of OS and PFS were also seen in the subgroup of PR (best response) and oligo progression of first-line immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes of IBP were similar to those of non-IBP in patients with PD after first-line immnuotherapy in advanced NSCLC. But more cycles, PR as best response and oligo progression in first-line was benefit.

Additional local therapy before disease progression for EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

International guidelines recommend the use of local therapy (LT) to limited progression in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the use of LT before disease progression has not been extensively analyzed. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of administering additional LT in conjunction with first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) before disease progression in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up until May 31, 2023. The LT group consisted of patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs in conjunction with additional LT, while the TKI group comprised participants treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs alone. Studies comparing the survival outcomes of the LT and TKI groups were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023439913).

Results

Among the 11 investigated studies covering 1,313 patients, the LT modalities included radiotherapy, surgery, and ablation therapy, which accounted for 91%, 27%, and 27% of the studies, respectively. The pooled hazard ratios of median PFS and OS were 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.53; P<0.001] and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.36-0.48; P<0.001), respectively, which indicated significant benefits for the LT group compared to the TKI group. There was no significant difference between the LT and TKI groups (P=0.473) regarding the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the strategic use of additional LT before disease progression is a promising approach for the treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Intracranial Efficacy of Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Real-World Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR or ALK Alterations

Contrary to Pemetrexed-containing chemo-immunotherapy studies, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel (ABCP) treatment has consistently shown clinical benefit in prospective studies in patients with lung cancer and actionable mutations, where intracranial metastases are common. Here, we aimed to describe the real-life population of patients fit to receive ABCP after targeted therapy and quantify its clinical effect in patients with brain metastases. Patients treated in Cheshire and Merseyside between 2019 and 2022 were identified. Data were collected retrospectively. A total of 34 patients with actionable EGFR or ALK alterations had treatment with a median age of 59 years (range 32-77). The disease control rate was 100% in patients with PDL1 ≥ 1% (n = 10). In total, 19 patients (56%) had brain metastases before starting ABCP, 17 (50%) had untreated CNS disease, and 4 (22%) had PDL1 ≥ 1%. The median time to symptom improvement was 12.5 days (range 4-21 days), with 74% intracranial disease control rates and 89.5% synchronous intracranial (IC) and extracranial (EC) responses. IC median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) was 6.48 months, EC mPFS was 10.75 months, and median Overall Survival 11.47 months. ABCP in real-life patients with brain metastases (treated or untreated) was feasible and showed similar efficacy to that described in patients without actionable mutations treated with upfront chemo-immunotherapy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligoprogression with or without switch of systemic therapy

Background

Oligoprogression is defined as cancer progression of a limited number of metastases under active systemic therapy. The role of metastasis-directed therapy, using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is controversial as is the continuation versus switch of systemic therapy. We report outcomes of oligoprogressive patients after SBRT, and compare those patients that continued or switched their current line of systemic therapy.

Material/Methods

We included patients who developed up to 5 progressive extracranial metastases under systemic therapy for any solid organ malignancy and were treated with SBRT to all lesions at our institution between 01/2014 and 12/2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the interval to the next systemic therapy line determined using cumulative incidence functions. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the influence of baseline and post-progression variables on OS, PFS and survival with the next systemic therapy after SBRT.

Results

Among 135 patients with oligoprogressive disease of which the most common primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 46, 34.1 %), 96 continued their current line of systemic therapy after oligoprogression. Among 39 who switched systemic therapy, 28 (71.8 %) paused or discontinued, while 11 (28.2 %) immediately started another systemic treatment. After a median follow-up of 27.2 months, patients that switched and those who continued systemic therapy after oligoprogression had comparable median OS (32.1 vs. 38.2 months, p = 0.47) and PFS (4.3 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.6). The intervals to the next systemic therapy line were comparable between both cohorts (p = 0.6). An ECOG performance status of 2 and immediately starting a new systemic therapy after oligoprogression were associated with a poorer survival without next systemic therapy, while the de-novo OMD state was associated with better survival without next systemic therapy compared to the induced state.

Conclusion

Oncological outcomes of patients that continued or switched systemic therapy after SBRT for oligoprogression were comparable, potentially indicating that further lines of treatment may be safely delayed in selected cases.

Treatment-Related Pneumonitis of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Thoracic radiation therapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancers may overcome resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the risk of severe treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) is a major concern, and the results of the combined treatment remain controversial. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review existing publications and provide a meta-analysis of TRP from a combined therapy of thoracic RT and TKIs. A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify eligible publications. The number of severe TRP cases of grade 3 or higher was extracted and then analyzed by fixed or randomized model meta-analysis. Heterogeneity tests were performed using the I² and τ² statistics. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the types of RT and the sequence of the combined treatment. Our literature search identified 37 eligible studies with 1143 patients. Severe TRP occurred in 3.8% (95% CI, 1.8%-6.5%) of patients overall, and fatal pneumonitis occurred rarely in 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.3%). In the subgroup analysis, the severe TRP proportion was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.0%-4.1%) for patients under definitive (chemo)RT (19 studies, n = 702) versus 2.9% (95% CI, 1.3%-5.1%) for patients who received local stereotactic body RT or palliative RT (15 studies, n = 361). The severe TRP rate was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.4%-8.1%) for concurrent TKI and RT (26 studies, n = 765), which was significantly higher than TRP of 0.4% (95% CI, 0.0%-3.1%) for sequential therapy (6 studies, n = 200). Our meta-analysis showed that combined thoracic RT and epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI therapy has an acceptable risk of severe TRP and rare mortality in patients with non-small cell lung cancers. Concurrent treatment is less tolerable and should be administered with caution. Further investigations using osimertinib are required as the data on its effects are limited.

Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop resistance to systemic therapy, with some having limited disease progression (ie, oligoprogression). We aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting oligoprogressive sites could improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial of SBRT in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after having received at least first-line systemic therapy, with oligoprogression defined as five or less progressive lesions on PET-CT or CT. Patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled from a tertiary cancer centre in New York, NY, USA, and six affiliated regional centres in the states of New York and New Jersey, with a 1:1 randomisation between standard of care (standard-of-care group) and SBRT plus standard of care (SBRT group). Randomisation was done with a computer-based algorithm with stratification by number of progressive sites of metastasis, receptor or driver genetic alteration status, primary site, and type of systemic therapy previously received. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured up to 12 months. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by disease site. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03808662, and is complete.

FINDINGS

From Jan 1, 2019, to July 31, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=51; 23 patients with breast cancer and 28 patients with NSCLC) or SBRT plus standard of care (n=55; 24 patients with breast cancer and 31 patients with NSCLC). 16 (34%) of 47 patients with breast cancer had triple-negative disease, and 51 (86%) of 59 patients with NSCLC had no actionable driver mutation. The study was closed to accrual before reaching the targeted sample size, after the primary efficacy endpoint was met during a preplanned interim analysis. The median follow-up was 11·6 months for patients in the standard-of-care group and 12·1 months for patients in the SBRT group. The median progression-free survival was 3·2 months (95% CI 2·0-4·5) for patients in the standard-of-care group versus 7·2 months (4·5-10·0) for patients in the SBRT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·35-0·81; p=0·0035). The median progression-free survival was higher for patients with NSCLC in the SBRT group than for those with NSCLC in the standard-of-care group (10·0 months [7·2-not reached] vs 2·2 months [95% CI 2·0-4·5]; HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·75; p=0·0039), but no difference was found for patients with breast cancer (4·4 months [2·5-8·7] vs 4·2 months [1·8-5·5]; 0·78, 0·43-1·43; p=0·43). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in 21 (41%) patients in the standard-of-care group and 34 (62%) patients in the SBRT group. Nine (16%) patients in the SBRT group had grade 2 or worse toxicities related to SBRT, including gastrointestinal reflux disease, pain exacerbation, radiation pneumonitis, brachial plexopathy, and low blood counts.

INTERPRETATION

The trial showed that progression-free survival was increased in the SBRT plus standard-of-care group compared with standard of care only. Oligoprogression in patients with metastatic NSCLC could be effectively treated with SBRT plus standard of care, leading to more than a four-times increase in progression-free survival compared with standard of care only. By contrast, no benefit was observed in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer. Further studies to validate these findings and understand the differential benefits are warranted.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute.

Measured Steps: Navigating the Path of Oligoprogressive Lung Cancer with Targeted and Immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses the definitions, treatment modalities, management, future directions, and ongoing clinical trials of oligoprogressive disease in oncogene-driven and non-oncogene-driven NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last decades, diagnostic and treatment modalities for oligometastatic NSCLC have advanced significantly, leading to improved survival. Additionally, our understanding of the tumor biology of oligoprogressive disease has expanded. However, despite the efforts of organizations, such as EORTC, ESTRO, and ASTRO proposing definitions for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, heterogeneity in definitions persists in (ongoing) trials. Recognizing the significance of subclassification within oligoprogressive disease in NSCLC and the varying risks associated with subsequent metastatic spread, there is a call for tailored management strategies. A consensus on standardized criteria for the definition of oligoprogressive disease is urgently needed and will not only facilitate meaningful comparisons between studies but also pave the way for the development of personalized treatment plans that take into account the heterogeneous nature of oligoprogressive disease.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive and Oligorecurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in oligoprogressive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We evaluated whether SBRT in a subset of patients with oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent NSCLC offers a durable response, obviating the need to change systemic therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 168 NSCLC patients who underwent SBRT for oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent disease was performed. Oligoprogression was defined as progression in ≤5 lesions during or after systemic therapy following an initial complete or partial response. Oligorecurrence was defined as progression while off systemic therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment or death (TNT-D) were estimated.

RESULTS

Median age was 68 years. Sixty-seven percent of patients were on systemic therapy at the time of progression. Progression at the primary site was present in 31% of the patients. The number of sites of metastatic progression was 0 to 2 in 76% and 3 to 5 in 24% of the patients. Two-year OS and PFS were 56% (95%CI 46%-64%) and 14% (95%CI 8%-21%), respectively. Median TNT-D was 9 months (95%CI 6-11). No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was seen. In multivariable analysis, patients with 3 to 5 sites of metastatic progression had worse OS (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.5-4.3, P < .001) and shorter TNT-D (HR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.5, P = .01) than those with 0 to 2 sites.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a safe and viable treatment option for oligoprogressive and oligorecurrent NSCLC. Patients with 0 to 2 sites had better OS and longer TNT-D compared to those with 3 to 5 lesions.

Local control strategies for management of NSCLC with oligoprogressive disease

Progresses of systemic treatments in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and targeted therapies, led to the increased incidence of oligoprogressive disease (OPD). The OPD is a subtype of oligometastatic disease (OMD) defined as a progression of a limited number of lesions during systemic treatment exposure. The hypothesis was formulated that local radical treatments (LRT) could eradicate progressive lesions resulting from resistant clones, ultimately leading to systemic treatment sensitivity restoration. Recently published international consensuses and guidelines aim to obtain a uniform definition of OMD NSCLC, to standardize the inclusion of these patients in future clinical trials, as well as their management in daily practice. Although there is no specific definition of OPD, LRT strategies in OPD are supported after reporting promising results. Both retrospective and preliminary prospective randomized data of LRT for patients with OPD NSCLC are encouraging. More clinical and translational data are needed for selecting best scenarios where LRT should be delivered. In this review, we analyze the current available literature on LRT for patients with OPD in advanced NSCLC and discuss about future trial design and challenges.

The Emerging Role of Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Oligoprogressive disease (OPD) is an emerging concept that describes patients who have progression of disease in a limited number of metastatic sites while on systemic therapy. Growing evidence has suggested the integration of local ablative therapy with systemic agents in patients with OPD further improves survival. In oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer, stereotactic body radiotherapy may have an important role in the effective local control of selective progressing metastases, which may translate to better patient outcomes. This review explores the treatment paradigm of this subset of patients and provides an update on the current existing literature on this topic.

Impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in non-small-cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion treated with targeted therapy: Propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

EGFR-mutant (EGFR-M) and ALK-positive (ALK-P)are common in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (MPE-NSCLC). The impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in such patients remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether thoracic tumor radiotherapy could improve overall survival (OS) in such patients.

METHODS

According to whether or not patients accepted thoracic tumor radiotherapy, 148 patients with EGFR-M or ALK-P MPE-NSCLC treated with targeted therapy were classified into two groups: DT group without thoracic tumor radiotherapy and DRT group with thoracic tumor radiotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical baseline characteristics. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, compared by log-rank test, and evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Median survival time (MST) was 25 months versus 17 months in the DRT group and DT group. The OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5 years in the DRT group and DT group were 75.0%, 52.8%, 26.8%, 11.1% and 64.5%, 28.4%, 9.2%, 1.8%, respectively (χ2  = 12.028, p = 0.001). Compared with DT group, the DRT group still had better survival after PSM (p = 0.007). Before and after PSM, factors associated with better OS through multivariable analysis were that thoracic tumor radiotherapy, radiotherapy, N0-2 , and ALK-TKIs. Grades 4-5 radiation toxicities were not observed in patients; 8 (11.6%) and 7 (10.1%) out of the DRT group suffered from Grade 3 radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results for EGFR-M or ALK-P MPE-NSCLC showed that thoracic tumor radiotherapy may be crucial factor in improving OS with acceptable toxicities. Potential biases should not be neglected: Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm this result.

Failure pattern and radiotherapy exploration in malignant pleural effusion non-small cell lung cancer treated with targeted therapy

Purpose

Actionable mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)with malignant pleural effusion(MPE)(MPE-NSCLC). The pattern of failure in MPE-NSCLC treated with targeted therapy after MPE control remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the failure pattern of such patients in a cohort study and explore the possibility of radiotherapy.

Patients and methods

Computed tomography scans of 86 patients were reviewed in this study. We classified first pattern of failure after MPE control as initial disease sites only (IF), new distant sites only (NF), or IF and NF detected simultaneously (INF). Patients evaluated suitable for radiotherapy after disease progression were divided into two groups: D group without radiotherapy and RD group with radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses.

Results

Disease progression after MPE control was observed in 42 patients with complete serial imaging. Median time to any progression was 9.5 months. Rate of the IF, NF and INF were 50%, 17% and 33% for all patients,60%,0% and 40% for patients with MPE recurrence (n=10,23.8%) and 47%, 22% and 31% for patients (n=32,76.2%) without MPE recurrence, respectively. Out of 10 patients(23.8%) with MPE recurrence, 7 patients simultaneous underwent primary tumor progression and 5 MPE were cytologically confirmed in 7 patients with examination. The overall survival (OS )rates at 1, 2, 3 years for the RD group and D group were 88.2%, 50.5%, 21.7% and 80.0%, 20.3%, 0%, respectively; the corresponding MST were 26.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively (χ2 = 4.959, p =0.026).

Conclusions

Our data indicates that 50% of patients with actionable mutations MPE- NSCLC after MPE control are likely to fail at their initial sites of disease and the use of radiotherapy may bring OS benefits during the course of their disease. Multicenter RCT is necessary to confirm the result in the future.

EGFR inhibitor erlotinib plus monoclonal antibody versus erlotinib alone for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Immuno-combination therapy is emerging as an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, compared to monotherapy, such as monoclonal antibodies or kinase inhibitors, whether combination therapy can enhance antitumor efficacy or alleviate side effects remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify eligible studies concentrating on treatment with erlotinib or erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies in NSCLC patients published between January 2017 and June 2022. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Seven independent randomized, controlled clinical trials including 1513 patients were obtained for the final analysis. Erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies was significantly associated with the improvement of PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI 0.53-0.69; z = 7.59, P < 0.01) and with moderate performance regarding OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.58-1.13; z = 1.23, P = 0.22) and RR (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% CI 0.98-1.59; z = 1.80, P = 0.07), irrespective of EGFR mutation status. In the safety evaluation, erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies had a markedly higher occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of Clavien grade 3 or higher (OR, 3.32; 95% CI 2.66-4.15; z = 10.64, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with erlotinib alone, combination therapy (erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies) was associated with significantly improved PFS in NSCLC therapy, accompanied by increased treatment-related AEs.

REGISTRATION

Our systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (CRD42022347667).

Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part I: non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.

Survival benefit of thoracic radiotherapy plus EGFR-TKIs in patients with non-oligometastatic advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-center retrospective study

Objectives:

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods:

Patients with non-oligometastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were recruited. All patients received the first-generation TKI treatment with or without radiotherapy. The irradiated sites included primary and/or metastatic lesions. Of all the patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy, some received radiotherapy before EGFR-TKI resistance, others received radiotherapy after progressive disease.

Results:

No statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (median 14.7 versus 11.2 months, p = 0.075) or overall survival (OS) (median 29.6 versus 40.6 months, p = 0.116) between patients treated with EGFR-TKIs alone and those with additional radiotherapy to any sites. However, EGFR inhibitors with thoracic radiation significantly improved OS (median 47.0 versus 31.0 months, p < 0.001) but not PFS (median 13.9 versus 11.9 months, p = 0.124). Moreover, longer PFS (median 18.3 versus 8.5 months, p < 0.001) was achieved in the preemptive thoracic radiation cohort than in the delayed thoracic radiation cohort. However, OS was similar between the two cohorts (median 40.6 versus 52.6 months, p = 0.124). The lower incidence rate of grade 1–2 pneumonitis occurred in preemptive radiation cohort (29.8% versus 75.8%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Non-oligometastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations benefited from thoracic radiotherapy while using EGFR inhibitors. Preemptive thoracic radiotherapy could be a competitive first-line therapeutic option due to superior PFS and favorable safety.

Is stereotactic body radiotherapy an effective treatment in metastatic lung cancer with oligoprogressive disease?

BACKGROUND

Oligoprogression (OPD) is defined as a condition where limited progression (1-3 metastases) is observed in patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment. In this study we investigated the impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with OPD from metastatic lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from a cohort of consecutive patients with SBRT treated between June 2015 and August 2021 were collected. All extracranial metastatic sites of OPD from lung cancer were included. Dose regimens consisted of mainly 24 in 2 fractions, 30-51 Gy in 3 fractions, 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions, 52.5 Gy in 7 fractions and 44-56 Gy in 8 fractions. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS), Local Control (LC), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) from the start date of SBRT to the event.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients, 34 female and 29 males were included. Median age was 75 years (range 25-83). All patients received concurrent systemic treatment before the start of the SBRT: 19 chemotherapy (CT), 26 CT plus immunotherapy (IT) or Tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) and 18 IT/TKI. SBRT was delivered to the lung (n = 29), mediastinal node (n = 9), bone (n = 7), adrenal gland (n = 19), other visceral metastases (1) and other node metastases (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 17 months, median OS was 23 months. LC was 93% at 1 year and 87% at 2 years. DFS was 7 months. According to our results, there was no statistically significant correlation between prognostic factors and OS after SBRT in OPD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Median DFS was 7 months, translating into the continuation of effective systemic treatment as other metastases grow slowly. In patients with oligoprogression disease, SBRT is a valid and efficient treatment that may enable postponing the switch of systemic line.

Prediction Model for Tumor Volume Nadir in EGFR -mutant NSCLC Patients Treated With EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

PURPOSE

In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and oncogenic driver mutations treated with effective targeted therapy, a characteristic pattern of tumor volume dynamics with an initial regression, nadir, and subsequent regrowth is observed on serial computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed and validated a linear model to predict the tumor volume nadir in EGFR -mutant advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with EGFR -mutant advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI as their first EGFR-directed therapy were studied for CT tumor volume kinetics during therapy, using a previously validated CT tumor measurement technique. A linear regression model was built to predict tumor volume nadir in a training cohort of 34 patients, and then was validated in an independent cohort of 84 patients.

RESULTS

The linear model for tumor nadir prediction was obtained in the training cohort of 34 patients, which utilizes the baseline tumor volume before initiating therapy (V 0 ) to predict the volume decrease (mm 3 ) when the nadir volume (V p ) was reached: V 0 -V p =0.717×V 0 -1347 ( P =2×10 -16 ; R2 =0.916). The model was tested in the validation cohort, resulting in the R2 value of 0.953, indicating that the prediction model generalizes well to another cohort of EGFR -mutant patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Clinical variables were not significant predictors of tumor volume nadir.

CONCLUSION

The linear model was built to predict the tumor volume nadir in EGFR -mutant advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, which provide an important metrics in treatment monitoring and therapeutic decisions at nadir such as additional local abrasive therapy.

Tumor Volume Nadir in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Alectinib

PURPOSE

Patients with oncogene-driven advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with effective targeted therapy demonstrate characteristic tumor volume dynamics with initial response, nadir, and subsequent regrowth. This study investigated tumor volume nadir and time to nadir in patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC treated with alectinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with alectinib monotherapy, tumor volume dynamics were evaluated on serial computed tomography (CT) scans using a previously validated CT tumor measurement technique. A linear regression model was built to predict tumor volume nadir. Time-to-event analyses were performed to evaluate time to nadir.

RESULTS

Among 45 patients who experienced initial volume decrease, 37 patients (25 with tumor regrowth and 12 without regrowth but >6 months follow-up) were studied for nadir volume (V_p). The linear model to predict tumor volume nadir was built using the baseline tumor volume (V₀): V₀-V_p = .696 × V₀ + 5,326 (P < 2 × 10^-16; adjusted R² = 0.86). The percent volume changes at nadir (median, -90.9%, mean, -85.3%) showed larger decrease in patients who were treated with alectinib as first-line therapy than in the ≥2nd-line group and were independent of V₀ and clinical variables. Time to nadir had a median of 11.5 months and was longer in the first-line group (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The tumor nadir volume in patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC treated with alectinib can be predicted by the liner regression model and consists of approximately 30% of the baseline volume minus 5 cm³, providing additional insights into precision therapy monitoring and potential guides for local ablative therapy to prolong disease control.

The "new" oligometastatic disease state and associated therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at stage IV have typically been considered incurable. Nonetheless, there is growing evidence that certain patient groups with fewer metastases, or so-called oligometastatic disease, which may have a more indolent biological nature than widespread metastatic diseases, may survive longer if definitive local treatment is administered to all metastatic sites. According to several retrospective investigations, this subgroup had a better prognosis than other stage IV patients, and the eighth edition of TNM staging was revised to reflect these findings. As a result of rapidly emerging systemic therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and a growing number of targeted therapies, more patients with this uncommon clinical opportunity have been identified and have received greater clinical attention. Currently, there is no established protocol for the management of oligometastatic disease, and the majority of therapeutic decisions are made through multidisciplinary discussion. In addition to systemic treatment, the two primary local therapeutic options for oligometastatic diseases are surgery and radiotherapy. A few phase 2 trials suggest that aggressive local ablative therapy may significantly improve the prognosis of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. This review summarizes the most recent data on the management of oligometastatic NSCLC, with a focus on the prognostic significance of local ablative therapy in these patients.

Circulating immune response proteins predict the outcome following disease progression of osimertinib treated epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Lung cancer patients with sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations treated with osimertinib will eventually develop progressive disease (PD). The survival following PD varies greatly between patients, and no effective treatment strategy has been established. Furthermore, at the moment, no easily accessible and precise biomarker exists that can predict the survival after PD.

Methods

We analyzed blood samples drawn from non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations that were treated with osimertinib. The levels of 92 circulating proteins were analyzed from plasma samples using a proximity extension assay (PEA). The results were evaluated with Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis to reveal patterns of protein expression at progression while on osimertinib treatment.

Results

We found that the expression of 7 proteins were significantly altered at PD, compared to a sample taken at osimertinib response. GO enrichment analysis demonstrated that most of the significant proteins were related to the immune system, specifically the adaptive immune response. Defining two groups of patients, based on the levels of circulating immune response proteins at PD, revealed significant differences in the overall survival (OS) after PD [hazard ratio (HR) =3.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-7.45; P=0.0046].

Conclusions

In this study, we discover novel circulating biomarkers that can predict the OS after PD on osimertinib. These findings support the recent acknowledgement of the immune system's importance in osimertinib resistance.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for acquired resistance to EGFR therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The advent of targeted therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm and survival of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations. The development of acquired resistances during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) impedes a prolonged survival in many patients. This fact is leading to the use of locally ablative therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to counter these resistances. SABR is a non-invasive treatment that can be delivered in multiple locations and has already proven effective in oligometastatic disease. Clinical evidence suggests that the combination of SABR with TKIs prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic NSCLC patients with mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with international guidelines recommending their use in unfavorable scenarios such as oligoprogressive disease. In this publication, we have reviewed the available evidence on EGFR-TKIs resistance mechanisms and the combination of SABR with TKI in metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations. We also describe the utility and clinical recommendations of this combination in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease.

The surgical resection of the primary tumor increases survival in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a tertiary center cohort study

Tumor resection could increase treatment efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to retrospectively analyze patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC from a Taiwanese tertiary center and receiving EGFR-TKI treatment with or without tumor resection. A total of 349 patients were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 53 EGFR-TKI treated patients and 53 EGFR-TKI treated patients with tumor resection were analyzed. The tumor resection group showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) (52.0 vs. 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.19; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 30.6 months; HR = 0.14; p < 0.001) compared to the monotherapy group. In the subgroup analysis of patients with newly-diagnosed NSCLC, the tumor resection group showed longer PFS (52.0 vs. 9.9 months; HR = 0.14; p < 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 32.6 months; HR = 0.12; p < 0.001) than the monotherapy group. In conclusion. the combination of EGFR-TKI and tumor resection provided better PFS and OS than EGFR-TKI alone, and patients who underwent tumor resection within six months had fewer co-existing genomic alterations and better PFS.

Oligoprogression in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of lung cancers and is the most common non-cutaneous cancer world-wide. In NSCLC, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease (OPD) have been recognized as separate entities within the realm of metastatic disease and are emerging concepts in the context of targeted systemic therapies. Our objectives are to discuss the current literature regarding the evolving definitions of OPD in the context of oligometastatic disease (OMD) for NSCLC. Further, to discuss current and future clinical trials that have shaped our local approach with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods

Literature on OPD in NSCLC and local ablative therapy (LAT) including SBRT/SABR and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was reviewed.

Key Content and Findings

Oligoprogression is defined as limited (usually 3-5) metastatic areas progressing while on/off systemic therapy in the background of oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease. Prognosis in OPD with treatment (such as LAT and systemic therapy) may be more favorable. Outcomes for patients progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with molecular mutations [such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)] who receive LAT are promising.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with NSCLC metastasis with progression at a limited number of sites on/off a given line of systemic therapy may have favorable outcomes with aggressive LAT, which includes SBRT/SABR/SRS. Further studies need to be completed to further optimize treatment recommendations.

Radiotherapy of the Primary Disease for Synchronous Metastatic Cancer: A Systematic Review

In the case of synchronous metastatic disease, the local treatment of primary tumors by radiotherapy has long been reserved for palliative indications. The emergence of the concept of oligometastatic and oligopersistent diseases, the advent of new systemic therapies enabling longer overall survival with an enhanced quality of life, a better understanding of the biologic history of metastatic spread, and technical advances in radiation therapy are revolutionizing the management of patients with de novo metastatic cancer. The prognosis of these patients has been markedly improved and many studies have investigated the survival benefits from the local treatment of various primary tumors in cases of advanced disease at the time of diagnosis or in the case of oligopersistence. This article provides an update on the place of irradiation of the primary tumor in cancer with synchronous metastases, and discusses its interest through published or ongoing trials.

Efficacy and Failure Patterns of Early SBRT to the Primary Tumor in Advanced EGFR-Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer with EFGR-TKI Treatment: A Prospective, Single Arm, Phase II Study

Early stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor combined with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EFGR-TKI) treatment may increase progression-free survival (PFS) by delaying resistance in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this prospective, single arm, phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with EGFR-TKI (icotinib 125 mg tid or gefitinib 250 mg qd) for one month followed by SBRT (40-60 Gy/5-8 F/5-10 d) to the primary tumor with concurrent EGFR-TKI until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS and the patterns of failure. Overall survival (OS) and adverse effects (AEs) were secondary endpoints. Overall, 41 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations received treatment with 24.42 months of median follow-up time. On average, SBRT was initiated 1.49 months after EGFR-TKI administration. Tumors were found to have an average shrinkage rate of 42.50%. Median PFS was 15.23 months (95% CI 13.10-17.36), while median OS was 27.57 months (95% CI 23.05-32.09). Thirty-three patients were found to have disease progression, of which new site failure (NF) (22 patients, 66.66%) was the most common pattern, followed by original site failure (OF) (7 patients, 21.21%) and simultaneous OF/NF (ONF) (4 patients, 12.12%). There were no Aes equal to or greater than grade 3, with the most frequent AE being radiation pneumonitis. Therefore, administering therapy targeted at the primary tumor using early SBRT after EGFR-TKI initiation is a new potentially safe and effective approach to treat EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

The value of completion residual lung resection in ipsilateral recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Recurrence is one of the most important challenges to manage lung cancer. Selected patients might be candidates for resection. This study assessed the outcomes and hazard factors of patients after completion of lung resection for recurrence, focusing specifically on postrecurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 63 patients who underwent complete pulmonary resection for recurrence between January 2015 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria include potentially curative first resection for primary lung cancer, histologically proven recurrent or new malignancy, and complete pathological report after both operations. PRS and OS were assessed and the influence of patient and treatment features on these endpoints was evaluated.

Results

Most of the patients recurred at stage IIIA, and nearly three-fourth received complete pneumonectomy. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates were 95% and 75%, whereas the overall 2- and 5-year postrecurrence survival rates were 55% and 36%, respectively. No patient died within 30 or 90 days after completion of residual lung resection, and no serious complications occurred during follow-up. Upon selection of clinically important variables by the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the r-stage [hazard ratio (HR), 3.35; 95% CI, 1.11–10.10; P = 0.03] and stage of primary tumor (HR, 6.26; 95% CI, 2.00–19.55; P &lt; 0.01) were hazard factors for PRS and OS respectively.

Conclusions

Complete pulmonary resection is an acceptable option in selected patients with recurrent lung cancer after surgery. The patients with r-stage earlier than IIIA may benefit from completion pulmonary resection but not IIIB. Completion pneumonectomy failed to significantly prolong the OS. The OS in the enrolled cases was mainly affected by the p-TNM stage assessed by the first resection for primary lung cancer.

Outcomes With Local Therapy and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in Patients With ALK/ROS1/RET-Rearranged Lung Cancers

PURPOSE

Local therapy prolongs progression-free survival in patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancers treated with chemotherapy. We previously reported that local therapy also prolongs survival and time to next therapy in patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas. Here, we investigate the role of local therapy in patients progressing on TKIs for ALK/ROS1/RET-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced ALK/ROS/RET-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas who underwent radiation, surgery, or percutaneous thermal ablation from 2012 to 2020 for progression on an ALK/ROS1/RET TKI were included. Progression patterns were identified. Times from local therapy to progression, next therapy, and death were measured.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with ALK (n = 37), ROS1 (n = 12), and RET (n = 12) fusions were identified. Patients received radiotherapy (92%), surgery (13%), and percutaneous thermal ablation (8%). Local therapy was administered for solitary/oligoprogressive (94%) or polyprogressive (6%) disease. For most patients (85%), local therapy addressed all progressing sites. The median times from any local therapy to subsequent progression and next systemic therapy were 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.1) and 10 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 15.3), respectively. Third or greater local therapy was associated with shorter time to progression and next therapy than first/second local therapies (hazard ratio, 4.97; P < .001 and hazard ratio, 2.48; P < .001). The median overall survival from first local therapy was 34 months (95% CI, 26 to not reached).

CONCLUSION

Local therapy for progression on ALK, ROS1, or RET TKIs is associated with clinically meaningful time on continued TKI therapy beyond progression, especially earlier in the course of disease.

Systemic and Oligo-Acquired Resistance to PD-(L)1 Blockade in Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical patterns and the associated optimal management of acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade are poorly understood.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

All cases of metastatic lung cancer treated with PD-(L)1 blockade at Memorial Sloan Kettering were reviewed. In acquired resistance (complete/partial response per RECIST, followed by progression), clinical patterns were distinguished as oligo (OligoAR ≤ 3 lesions of disease progression) or systemic (sAR). We analyzed the relationships between patient characteristics, burden/location of disease, outcomes, and efficacy of therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

Of 1,536 patients, 312 (20%) had an initial response and 143 developed AR (9% overall, 46% of responders). OligoAR was the most common pattern (80/143, 56%). Baseline tumor mutational burden, depth of response, and duration of response were significantly increased in oligoAR compared with sAR (P < 0.001, P = 0.03, P = 0.04, respectively), whereas baseline PD-L1 and tumor burden were similar. Post-progression, oligoAR was associated with improved overall survival (median 28 months vs. 10 months, P < 0.001) compared with sAR. Within oligoAR, post-progression survival was greater among patients treated with locally-directed therapy (e.g., radiation, surgery; HR, 0.41; P = 0.039). Fifty-eight percent of patients with oligoAR treated with locally-directed therapy alone are progression-free at last follow-up (median 16 months), including 13 patients who are progression-free more than 2 years after local therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

OligoAR is a common and distinct pattern of acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade compared with sAR. OligoAR is associated with improved post-progression survival and some cases can be effectively managed with local therapies with durable benefit.

Ablative Radiotherapy as a Strategy to Overcome TKI Resistance in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Simple Summary

Most patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who receive treatment with targeted therapy will eventually develop resistance, meaning the therapy will lose its efficacy. Prior studies have shown a benefit to continuing to treat patients on TKI therapy despite limited progression of one or more sites of metastatic disease in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on the data reviewed here, the use of radiation therapy to sites of disease progression is both efficacious and carries a low risk for side effects, with the added benefit of allowing patients to continue on TKI therapy.

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) positive for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. However, most individuals treated with TKI therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC will develop tumor resistance to TKI therapy. Therapeutic strategies to overcome TKI resistance are the topic of several ongoing clinical trials. One potential strategy, which has been explored in numerous trials, is the treatment of progressive sites of disease with stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We sought to review the literature pertaining to the use of local ablative radiation therapy in the setting of acquired resistance to TKI therapy and to discuss stereotactic radiation therapy as a strategy to overcome TKI resistance.

Clinical value of PET/CT in identifying patients with oligometastatic/oligoprogressive disease among first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Implications from survival comparisons

OBJECTIVE

Local therapy (LT) could potentially prolong the survival of patient with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and harboring oligometastatic/oligoprogressive disease (OMD/OPD). However, the optimal imaging method for identifying patients with OMD/OPD remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical value of incorporating PET/CT in detecting patients with OMD/OPD.

METHODS

Consecutive cases with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC undergoing first-line EGFR-TKI treatment were retrospectively screened and those receiving baseline PET/CT and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or complete conventional imaging (CIM), including brain MRI, chest computed tomography (CT), abdomen ultrasound or CT and bone scintigraphy were included. OMD/OPD was defined as metastases/progressions documented at a maximum of five lesions and three organs, otherwise was defined as multiple metastatic/progressive disease (MMD/MPD). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 392 patients evaluated, baseline OMD was detected in 22.7% (53/233) of patients by PET/CT and in 18.2% (29/159) of patients by CIM (p = 0.171). Among the patients evaluated with baseline PET/CT, patients with OMD had longer PFS (p = 0.016) and tendency of improved OS (p = 0.058) than those with MMD. However, this result was not observed with patients evaluated using baseline CIM. With a median follow-up of 24.2 (range, 1.1-124.6) months, 297 patients had their first disease progression (FPD), of whom 164 (55.2%) had adequate imaging scans to analyze the tumor distributions at FPD comprehensively. OPD was detected in 63.0% (34/54) and 35.0% (39/110) of patients among the PET/CT and CIM assessed group (p = 0.003), respectively. Among the PET/CT assessed group, patients with OPD had significantly longer post-progressive overall survival (OS2) than those with MPD (p = 0.011). However, no significant difference of OS2 in the CIM assessed group was found.

CONCLUSION

Patients with OMD/OPD, evaluated by PET/CT but not CIM, generally had more favorable survival outcomes than those with MMD/MPD among patients with metastatic NSCLC undergoing first-line EGFR-TKI treatment.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

PET/CT seems to affect the survival of patients under first-line EGFR-TKI treated metastatic NSCLC with OMD/OPD.

Histological Transformation after Acquired Resistance to the Third-Generation EGFR-TKI in Patients with Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background and Objectives: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is one of the standard-of-care therapies in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma; however, acquired resistance inevitably developed. Despite the proposition of histological transformation being one of the resistance mechanisms, its incidence and influence on outcome remain unclear. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital on patients with advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma receiving the third-generation EGFR-TKI. Only patients receiving rebiopsy were included in the analysis. Results: A total of 55 patients were studied. Eight patients (14.5%) showed histological transformation, including three small cell carcinoma, three squamous cell carcinoma, one large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and one with a mixture of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma components. The median treatment duration of the third-generation EGFR-TKI before rebiopsy was numerically longer in patients with histological transformation than those without (16.0 vs. 10.9 months). Both the overall survival time from the start of third-generation EGFR-TKI initiation (30.8 vs. 41.2 months) and from rebiopsy (6.6 vs. 12.9 months) to mortality were numerically shorter amongst the transformed population. All patients in the transformed group did not respond to the next line of systemic treatment. One patient with histological transformation receiving local treatment for the metastatic site had a longer overall survival. Conclusions: Repeating biopsy to identify histological transformation should be considered in patients with progression to the third-generation EGFR-TKI. Histological transformations could contribute to the acquired resistance with the implication of a worse prognosis. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for these patients.

A randomized, open-label, two-cycle, two-crossover phase I clinical trial comparing the bioequivalence and safety of afatinib and Giotrif® in healthy Chinese subjects

OBJECTIVE

Afatinib is an oral, irreversible ErbB family blocker. It binds covalently to the kinase domains of epidermal growth factor (EGFR), HER2 and HER4, resulting in irreversible inhibition of tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation. Our trial compared the bioequivalence and safety between afatinib produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. and Giotrif^® produced by Boehringer Ingelheim.

METHODS

Healthy Chinese subjects (N = 36) were randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1. There was a single dose per period of afatinib and Giotrif^®. The washout was set as 14 days. Plasma drug concentrations of afatinib and Giotrif^® were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis of major pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters was conducted to assess drug bioequivalence. In addition, we evaluated the safety of the drugs throughout the trial.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ for afatinib and Giotrif^® were 102.80%, 101.83%, and 101.58%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. In addition, both drugs showed a good safety profile during the trial.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that afatinib was bioequivalent to Giotrif^® in healthy Chinese subjects with well safety.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial website ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html # CTR20171160).

Mediating EGFR-TKI Resistance by VEGF/VEGFR Autocrine Pathway in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

NSCLC treatment includes targeting of EGFR with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as Erlotinib; however, resistance to TKIs is commonly acquired through T790M EGFR mutations or overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). We investigated the mechanisms of EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC cell lines with EGFR mutations or acquired resistance to Erlotinib. These studies showed upregulated gene and protein expression of VEGF, VEGFR-2, and a VEGF co-receptor neuropilin-1 (NP-1) in Erlotinib-resistant (1.4-5.3-fold) and EGFR double-mutant (L858R and T790M; 4.1-8.3-fold) NSCLC cells compared to parental and EGFR single-mutant (L858R) NSCLC cell lines, respectively. Immunofluorescence and FACS analysis revealed increased expression of VEGFR-2 and NP-1 in EGFR-TKI-resistant cell lines compared to TKI-sensitive cell lines. Cell proliferation assays showed that treatment with a VEGFR-2 inhibitor combined with Erlotinib lowered cell survival in EGFR double-mutant NSCLC cells to 9% compared to 72% after treatment with Erlotinib alone. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed shorter median survival in late-stage NSCLC patients with high vs. low VEGFR-2 expression (14 mos vs. 21 mos). The results indicate that VEGFR-2 may play a key role in EGFR-TKI resistance and that combined treatment of Erlotinib with a VEGFR-2 inhibitor may serve as an effective therapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Update on Image-Guided Thermal Lung Ablation: Society Guidelines, Therapeutic Alternatives, and Postablation Imaging Findings

Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) has been endorsed by multiple societies as a safe and effective lung-preserving treatment for primary lung cancer and metastases involving the lung and chest wall. This article reviews the role of IGTA in the care continuum of patients with thoracic neoplasms and discusses strategies to identify the optimal local therapy considering patient and tumor characteristics. The advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous thermal ablation compared to surgical resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy are summarized. Principles of radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, as well as the emerging use of transbronchial thermal ablation, are described. Specific considerations are presented regarding the role of thermal ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), multifocal primary NSCLC, pulmonary metastases, salvage of recurrent NSCLC after surgery or radiation, and pain palliation for tumors involving the chest wall. Recent changes to professional society guidelines regarding the role of thermal ablation in the lung, including for treatment of oligometastatic disease, are highlighted. Finally, recommendations are provided for imaging follow-up after thermal ablation of lung tumors, accompanied by examples of expected postoperative findings and patterns of disease recurrence.

TKI resistant-based prognostic immune related gene signature in LUAD, in which FSCN1 contributes to tumor progression

Drug resistance reflects the evolution of tumors, which is the main cause of recurrence and death. Currently, EGFR-TKI treatment is the first-line therapy for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Although EGFR-TKI achieved good effects at the beginning, most of the LUAD patients eventually acquired resistance. Therefore, it's urgently need to develop a strong criterion for identifying these patients who may benefit from additional therapy. In this study, we established a three TKI resistant-related gene signature (DDIT4, OAS3, FSCN1), and determined that's an accuracy, independent and specific prognostic model for LUAD patients. Patients categorized as high-risk by this signature showed more sensitive to chemotherapy, and exhibited higher expression of common immune checkpoints such as PD-L1/B3H7/PD-L2/IDO1. Moreover, these patients were characterized by increased infiltration of M0 macrophage and activated memory CD4⁺ T cells. The expression and prognostic values of DDIT4, FSCN1 and OAS3 were further confirmed in clinical data. In addition, experimental data showed that FSCN1 promoted LUAD development via PI3K/AKT signaling. In conclusion, this signature is highly predictive of prognostic in LUAD patients, and may serve as a powerful prediction tool for LUAD patients to further choose chemo- and immunotherapies.

Local ablative radiotherapy on oligo-progression while continued on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A longer cohort

BACKGROUND

The effect of adding local ablative radiotherapy on oligo-progression while continuing EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell Lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is to be determined.

METHODS

Outcomes of patients with stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations having ≤5 sites of oligo-progression while on EGFR-TKIs and given one to eight fractions of local ablative radiotherapy (LAR) were reviewed from 2012 to 2019. The time of starting first-line EGFR-TKIs to LAR is defined as progression-free survival 1 (PFS1; > one line of prior treatment allowed). The primary endpoint was PFS from LAR to further progression that led to stop of EGFR-TKIs (PFS2). The secondary endpoint was overall survival from LAR (OS). Factors affecting PFS2 and OS were analyzed with Cox regression.

RESULTS

There were total 55 eligible patients. The median follow-up time was 13.3 months. Majority (89%) had sensitive mutations (exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation). Total number of lesions treated were 75, including lung (n = 45), bone (n = 15), cervical lymph node (n = 1), adrenal (n = 1), and brain (n = 13). The median PFS2 was 6.9 months. The median OS was 25.1 months. On multivariable analysis, it was found that EGFR mutation type (exon 19 deletion / exon 21 L858R mutation vs. other rarer mutations), time from diagnosis to LAR within 70 days, and fewer lines of prior TKIs (1 or 2 vs. 3) had favorable effect on PFS2 (p = 0.006/0.00003; 0.046; 0.001/0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LAR is a noninvasive and effective modality in treatment of oligo-progressive diseases for patients with EGFR mutations positive NSCLC while on EGFR-TKIs.

Local consolidative therapy for synchronous oligometastatic non‐small cell lung cancer treated with first‐line pembrolizumab: A retrospective observational study

Background

Local consolidative therapy (LCT) has emerged as a treatment option in patients with oligometastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing chemotherapy or targeted therapy. However, the current literature lacks evidence as to whether LCT improves survival in NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy. Our study aimed to assess whether LCT combined with pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy could improve the survival of patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC, without EGFR or ALK genetic aberrations, who were treated with first‐line pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy, were included in the study. Survival analysis of the LCT and non‐LCT groups was compared.

Results

A total of 231 patients were included in the study. The median follow‐up time was 15.24 months. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 12.00 and 23.43 months, respectively. Of the 231 patients included, 76 patients received LCT combined with pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy (LCT group) while 155 patients received pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy alone (non‐LCT group). Of note, the PFS of the LCT and non‐LCT groups was 13.97 and 10.08 months (p = 0.016), respectively. The OS were 30.67 and 21.97 months (p = 0.011), respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly improved with LCT for patients with brain or lung metastases but not bone metastases. No significant increase in treatment‐related toxicity was observed in the LCT group.

Conclusions

The present study shows that LCT to metastatic sites is an option for consideration in patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC during first‐line pembrolizumab treatment, with significantly improved PFS and OS compared with systemic treatment alone.

Efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib treatment and postprogression patterns of care in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Reiwa study): study protocol of a multicentre, real-world observational study

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is widely used as the first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, most cases ultimately acquire resistance to osimertinib, and no effective treatment has been currently established for cases having progressive disease (PD) with osimertinib. In clinical practice, EGFR-TKI therapy could be continued beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST)-defined PD cases when they are clinically stable. Currently, the progression pattern of osimertinib and criteria for identifying patients who might benefit from osimertinib beyond PD are unknown. In addition, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as the first-line treatment in real-world clinical practice remain unclear in Japan. This multicentre study was designed to evaluate the real-world data on first-line osimertinib and its post-treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study enrols patients with EGFR mutation-positive, advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI as the first-line therapy after 1 September 2018, from October 2019 to August 2020, and those started on osimertinib will be followed up until August 2022. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the first-line osimertinib treatment, adherence to it, progression patterns on RECIST PD and subsequent treatment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All participating patients will provide written informed consent before entering the study. The protocol, amendments and patients' informed consent forms will be approved before study commencement by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee at each participation site (Lead Ethics Committee; Japan Red Cross Medical Center (26 April 2019, order number 976)). Patients will be anonymised before registration into the study and their anonymised data will be collected from the case report form. The results of this study will be presented at the national and international conferences and submitted for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000038683.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligo-Progressive Disease REfractory to Systemic Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Registry-based Phase II Randomized Trial (SUPPRESS-NSCLC)

•

Treatment of NSCLC patients with oligo-progressive disease on systemic treatment remains controversial.

•

This phase II trial evaluates SABR to all oligo-progressive lesions in combination to current systemic therapy.

•

PFS and OS between patients treated with SABR with continuation of current systemic therapy vs standard of care will be assessed.

•

Intention-to-treat analysis of SABR compared to standard of care will be evaluated.

Background

Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with oligoprogression remains controversial. There is limited data to support the strategy of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) targeting the oligoprogressive disease in combination with ongoing systemic treatment. We aim to assess the benefit of this approach compared to standard of care in the treatment of oligoprogressive NSCLC.

Methods

This phase II study will enroll 68 patients with oligoprogressive NSCLC, defined as 1–5 progressive extracranial lesions ≤5 cm involving ≤3 organs. Patients on active systemic therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy or a combination) will be randomized 1:1 to either continue their current systemic therapy in combination with SABR to all lesions or the standard of care (switch to the next line of treatment, continue same treatment or observation). The co-primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include time to next systemic treatment, patient-reported quality of life, cost effectiveness as well as translational analysis to characterize both adaptive immunity and immunogenic cell death markers in the peripheral blood.

Discussion

There is an unmet need to carefully examine the efficacy, safety and quality of life impact of SABR in the context of oligoprogressive disease. The present study will provide higher level randomized evidence on the role of SABR in oligoprogressive NSCLC.

Patient Selection for Local Aggressive Treatment in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Since the first introduction of the oligometastatic state with a low burden of metastases in non-small cell lung cancer, accumulating evidence from retrospective and prospective studies has shown that a local aggressive, multimodality treatment may significantly improve the prognosis in these patients. Local aggressive treatment includes a systemic therapy of micrometastatic disease, as well as a radical resection of the primary tumor and surgical resection and/or radiation therapy of distant metastases. However, patient selection and treatment allocation remain a central challenge in oligometastatic disease. In this review, we aimed to address the current evidence on criteria for patient selection for local aggressive treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

One-fourth of all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer presents with a limited number of metastases and relatively low systemic tumor burden. This oligometastatic state with limited systemic tumor burden may be associated with remarkably improved overall and progression-free survival if both primary tumor and metastases are treated radically combined with systemic therapy. This local aggressive therapy (LAT) requires a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation therapists, and thoracic surgeons. A surgical resection of the often advanced primary tumor should be part of the radical treatment whenever feasible. However, patient selection, timing, and a correct treatment allocation for LAT appear to be essential. In this review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the current evidence on patient selection criteria such as characteristics of the primary tumor and metastases, response to neoadjuvant or first-line treatment, molecular characteristics, mediastinal lymph node involvement, and other factors for LAT in oligometastatic NSCLC.

Oligoprogression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Several retrospective studies present evidence of oligoprogressive disease (OPD) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations such as EGFR. The strategy of local ablative therapy (LAT) with radiotherapy, followed by the continuation of the same anticancer drug therapy beyond progression disease, is recommended in the current NCCN guideline. Although evidence of the use of this strategy in the treatment of the driver mutation-negative NSCLC is missing, LAT with radiotherapy for OPD after combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor with cytotoxic chemotherapy is expected. Tumors outside of the radiation field may further respond to the immune checkpoint inhibitors due to an abscopal effect. In the future, to achieve long-term survival in advanced NSCLC, it will be important to validate this treatment strategy via prospective comparative studies and to actively implement it in clinical practice.

Abstract

We reviewed the literature on oligoprogressive disease (OPD) and local ablative therapy (LAT) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The frequency of OPD varies depending on its definition and is estimated to be between 15–47%. The implications of the strategy of continuing the same anticancer agents beyond progressive disease after LAT with radiation therapy for OPD are based on the concept of progression in which only a small number of lesions, not more than about four, proliferate after chemotherapy. In the case of OPD harboring driver mutations such as EGFR, prospective studies are underway. However, evidence from retrospective studies support this strategy, which is currently recommended in some guidelines. The prognosis in OPD cases during the administration of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is relatively promising. Additionally, LAT with radiation for OPD after the first-line treatment of ICI with cytotoxic chemotherapy may overcome the resistance to the combination drug therapy due to an abscopal effect. To achieve long-term survival in advanced-stage NSCLC, it is important to verify the optimal method and timing of the therapy through prospective comparative studies as well as patient selection based on patient characteristics and biomarker levels.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy to the primary lung lesion improves the survival of the selected patients with non-oligometastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR activating mutation with first-line EGFR-TKIs: a real-world study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the clinical value of SBRT for primary lung lesions of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with non-oligometastatic disease during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant non-oligometastatic NSCLC who were suitable to receive SBRT for the primary tumors after EGFR-TKI treatment. All selected patients were treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs and SBRT for their primary lesions. The primary endpoints were the progression-free survival 1 (PFS1, time of first TKI dose relative to disease progression based on RECIST) and PFS2 (time of first TKI dose relative to disease progression after SBRT). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were enrolled, including 45 patients who received SBRT for their primary tumor at the maximal response of EGFR-TKI (the preemptive RT group) and 34 patients who received SBRT for their primary tumor after the occurrence of oligoprogression (the delayed RT group). The preemptive RT group had a significantly better median PFS1 than the delayed RT group (22.3 months vs. 12.9 months, P = 0.0031). The median PFS2 in the preemptive RT and delayed RT groups were 22.3 and 28.9 months, respectively (P = 0.17). The median OS did not differ significantly between the preemptive RT group and the delayed RT group (46.6 versus 51.3 months, P = 0.54). No severe toxicities (≥ grade 3) were recorded.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study showed that preemptive RT to primary lung tumors is a feasible option for selected patients with EGFR-mutant non-oligometastatic NSCLC who had stable disease during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment, and that it significantly improved PFS.

Current Management of Oligometastatic Lung Cancer and Future Perspectives: Results of Thermal Ablation as a Local Ablative Therapy

A growing body of evidence shows improved overall survival and progression-free survival after thermal ablation in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with a limited number of metastases, combined with chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors or after local recurrence. Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are the most evaluated modalities, and target tumor size <3 cm (and preferably <2 cm) is a key factor of technical success and efficacy. Although thermal ablation offers some advantages over surgery and radiotherapy in terms of repeatability, safety, and quality of life, optimal management of these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach, and further randomized controlled trials are required to help refine patient selection criteria. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of available thermal ablation modalities and recent results supporting their use in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC disease along with their potential future implications in the emerging field of immunotherapy.

The role of surgery in the treatment of oligoprogression after systemic treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are generally considered incurable. The mainstay of treatment for these patients is systemic therapy. The addition of local treatment, including surgery, remains controversial. Oligoprogression is defined as advanced stage NSCLC with limited progression of disease after a period of prolonged disease stabilisation or after a partial or complete response on systemic therapy. In this retrospective study we evaluated outcome and survival of patients who underwent a resection for oligoprogression after systemic therapy for advanced stage NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with oligoprogression after systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC who were operated in the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital were included. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected in relation to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and December 2019, 28 patients underwent surgery for an oligoprogressive lesion (primary tumor lung (n = 12), other metastatic site (n = 16)). Median age at time of resection was 60 years (39-86) and 57% were female. Postoperative complications were observed in 2 patients (7%). Progression of disease after resection of the oligoprogressive site was observed in 17 patients (61%). Median PFS was 7 months since date of resection (95% CI 6.0-25.0) and median OS was not reached. Seven patients (25%) died during follow-up. Age was predictive for OS and clinical T4 stage was predictive for PFS. M1 disease at initial presentation was predictive for better PFS compared to patients who were diagnosed with M0 disease initially. Patients who underwent resection because of oligoprogression of the primary lung tumour had a better PFS, when compared to oligoprogression of another metastastic site.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection of an oligoprogressive lesion in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with systemic treatment is feasible and might be considered in order to achieve long term survival.

Classifying Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

An oligometastatic cancer state was first postulated in the 1990s by Hellman and Weichselbaum and described limited metastatic spread to a single or few sites of disease. It was hypothesized that this metastatic entity falls along a continuum of the natural history of cancer progression from a localized primary tumor to widespread metastases. Support for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has since been provided by multiple retrospective studies and then prospective randomized trials demonstrating better survival in this patient population after aggressive consolidative treatment. However, the lack of a universal definition of oligometastatic NSCLC has hindered a comparison between different studies and prevented well-defined recommendations for local consolidative treatment in this patient population. Attempts have been made to establish a common definition for use in clinical management and for the identification of inclusion criteria for future trials. In this review, we seek to summarize the current definitions of oligometastatic NSCLC based on recent expert consensus statements, previous randomized trials, and current treatment guidelines and to highlight the continued variability in current practice.