Results and implications from a gender minority health education module for advance practice nursing students

Delivering transgender-specific knowledge and skills into health and allied health studies and training: a systematic review

Many transgender individuals face inequities, discrimination, and sometimes even a lack of transgender-specific knowledge in health care settings. Educational curricula can address such disparities and help future health professionals to become more knowledgeable, confident, and well-prepared for addressing the needs of transgender individuals. This systematic review aims to summarize current training interventions about care of transgender individuals for health and allied health students, and to analyse the effects of the respective intervention. A total of six databases (Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and SciSearch) were screened for original articles published between 2017 and June 2021. Search terms and eligibility criteria were pre-specified, and after a structured selection process 21 studies were included into further analysis. Extracted data contained information on general study properties, population, design, program format and outcomes of interest. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize detected results. Study quality was assessed for each individual study. A self-developed 18-item checklist combining criteria of two prior published tools was used to assess overall quality of quantitative studies. For qualitative studies a 10-item checklist by Kmet et al. [HTA Initiat, 2004] was applied. Eligible studies were designed for multiple health or allied health profession students, and varied widely regarding program format, duration, content, and assessed outcomes. Almost all (N = 19) interventions indicated improvements in knowledge, attitude, confidence and comfort levels or practical skills concerning care for transgender clients. Major limitations included the lack of long-term data, validated assessment tools, control groups and comparative studies. Training interventions contribute to prepare future health professionals to deliver competent and sensitive care and which may improve the prospective experienced health care reality of transgender individuals. However, currently there is no common consensus about best practice of education. Additionally, little is known about whether detected effects of training interventions translate into noticeable improvements for transgender clients. Further studies are warranted to assess the direct impact of specific interventions in the light of the respective target populations.

Saving Lives: Suicide Prevention in LGBTQ Youth

Suicide in young people is a challenge, but suicide rates in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ) youth are alarming. The current article explores the influence of several social determinates of health, specifically mental health care access and quality and education, on suicide among LGBTQ youth. Providers must recognize the mental health challenges and disparities in LGBTQ youth and address them to improve mental health and decrease suicide rates. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 62(4), 6-8.].

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Health Education in Healthcare Professional Graduate Programs: A Comparison of Medical, Nursing, and Pharmacy Students

Relative to cisgender heterosexual persons, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people experience greater health inequities, thereby affecting their engagement in care. One strategy to address these disparities is to educate future healthcare professionals to provide nondiscriminatory care to LGBT people. The goal of this study was to explore the perceived coverage of LGBT health education topics in graduate-level medical (MD), pharmacy (PharmD) and nursing (DNP) curricula. Cross-sectional data were collected from web-based surveys (N = 733) completed by healthcare professional students enrolled at two universities in New York State. Of those who responded, 50.5% were MD, 38.9% were PharmD, and 10.6% were DNP students. Overall, mean scores indicated a dearth of perceived LGBT health coverage. Results demonstrated variations in coverage by degree program. Findings highlight the need to develop educational curricula inclusive of topics concerning LGBT patient health. Adequately educating the next generation of healthcare professionals can further promote healthcare engagement among LGBT persons and improve pedagogical practices in healthcare professional education programs.

Stakeholders Inform an LGBTQIA+ Health Best Practices Learning Module for Nursing Students

INTRODUCTION

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) summons nurse educators to address health care inequities by preparing leaders who advocate for vulnerable groups. A lack of academic guidelines promoting cultural competence in nursing with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and/or questioning, intersex, and asexual and/or aromantic (LGBTQIA+) individuals exist. The purpose of this study was to develop a learning module for health care providers about best practices in LGBTQIA+ health informed by key stakeholders.

METHODS

Exploratory qualitative design utilized focus group methodology obtaining stakeholder's views on LGBTQIA+ health, with a convenience sample recruited from a large public university. Focus group thematic analysis informed development of the learning module.

RESULTS

Three overarching themes emerged from focus group discussions (n = 31): appropriate terminology, health disparities, and respectful communication.

DISCUSSION

This project addresses an educational gap in nursing curriculum using an interactive online module, introducing key concepts about LGBTQIA+ health. Future research focused on the development of standards of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals can support inclusion and reduce discrimination in health care settings.

Societal stigma and mistreatment in healthcare among gender minority people: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Gender minority (GM; individuals whose gender is not aligned with that traditionally associated with the sex that was assigned to them at birth) people have widely reported mistreatment in healthcare settings. Mistreatment is enacted by individuals within society who hold stigmatizing beliefs. However, the relationship between healthcare mistreatment and societal stigma (i.e., the degree to which society disapproves of GM people) is unclear and not measured consistently.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 2,031 GM participants in The Population Research in Identity and Disparities for Equality (PRIDE) Study's 2019 Annual Questionnaire to determine whether societal stigma was associated with participants' past-year reports of mistreatment (defined as denial of healthcare services and/or lower quality care) in medical or mental healthcare settings. We created a proxy measure of societal stigma by incorporating variables validated in existing literature. Participants reported whether they had experienced mistreatment in medical and mental health settings independently.

RESULTS

Healthcare denial and/or lower quality care during the past year was reported by 18.8% of our sample for medical settings and 12.5% for mental health settings. We found no associations between the societal stigma variables and past-year reports of healthcare denial and/or lower quality care in medical or mental healthcare settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a high proportion of GM people reported past-year healthcare mistreatment in both medical and mental health settings, mistreatment had no relationship with societal stigma. Factors other than societal stigma may be more important predictors of healthcare mistreatment, such as healthcare workers' knowledge of and attitudes toward GM people. However, other measures of societal stigma, or different types of mistreatment, may show stronger associations. Identifying key factors that contribute to mistreatment can serve as targets for intervention in communities and healthcare settings.

Nursing pre-licensure and graduate education for LGBTQ health: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus (LGBTQ) people experience discrimination and health disparities compared to heterosexual cisgender people. Clinicians report discomfort and insufficient preparation for providing care to LGBTQ people and nursing has been slow to integrate LGBTQ health into curricula.

PURPOSE

Conduct a systematic review to examine and critically appraise peer-reviewed literature on nursing student knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) regarding LGBTQ health and the development/evaluation of LGBTQ health content in nursing curricula.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted (N = 1275 articles from PubMed, LGBT Health, CINAHL, ERIC, and Health Source-Nursing/Academic Edition).

FINDINGS

Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. Twelve studies described curricular interventions; however, there were few validated tools to evaluate content coverage or KSAs. Four themes emerged specific to LGBTQ health content inclusion.

DISCUSSION

While an emerging science of LGBTQ nursing education has been identified, more work is needed to build and evaluate a comprehensive curricular approach for full programmatic integration of LGBTQ health.

CONCLUSION

As nursing programs build LGBTQ content into nursing curricula, care must be taken to integrate this content fully with the depth of curricular content in population health, social determinants of health, social justice, intersectionality, cultural competence, and political advocacy.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Greater integration of LGBTQ health content into nursing education should be a priority for nursing education.

LGBTQ+ health education interventions for nursing students: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Nurses are the largest segment of the American healthcare workforce, yet little is known about how American nursing students are educated about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other individuals' (LGBTQ+) health and the efficacy of these trainings. This systematic review assessed articles in English that quantitatively evaluated the effects of curricula and training for nursing students regarding LGBTQ+ health and examined their effects on students' outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, Embase, Scopus and PsycINFO).

REVIEW METHODS

Controlled vocabulary and/or keywords were used for each database. Of the initial 1766 citations, 26 articles met inclusion criteria. Data extracted included study design, sample characteristic/size, training topic, modality, duration, trainer, measurement tool, training target, effect size, and key finding.

RESULTS

Nearly 80 % of the reviewed studies were published between 2018 and 2021. All studies included were quasi-experimental: pretest-posttest with control (n = 3), without control (n = 20), and posttest only without control (n = 3). Training modalities were categorized into four groups: multimodal pedagogy with (n = 7) and without simulation (n = 6), single modality with simulation (n = 6) and with didactic lectures (n = 7). Eight studies employed LGBTQ+ people as trainers. Eight studies included interprofessional students; 18 studies engaged only nursing students. Interventions improved students' knowledge about LGBTQ+ health (n = 8), attitudes toward LGBTQ+ communities (n = 8), comfort level regarding interacting with LGBTQ+ individuals (n = 7), confidence in providing LGBTQ+ inclusive care in practice (n = 13) and LGBTQ+ cultural competence in nursing care (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Educating and qualifying nursing students about LGBTQ+ health may improve their knowledge, attitudes, and skills when interacting with LGBTQ+ patients and may reduce health disparities for LGBTQ+ clients. Broad integration of content and competencies in LGBTQ+ health and well-being in nursing curricula should be prioritized. Future research should include rigorous, longitudinally designed evaluation of training curricula focusing on students' actual behavior changes. Evaluation should include comparison groups and validated measurement instruments about LGBTQ+ health education constructs specifically for nursing students.

Educating "Helping" Professional Students to "Help" Trans People Navigate Their Health Care Needs: A Review of Recent Literature

In the 2015 United States Trans Survey, trans people overwhelmingly indicated that training health-care providers about trans health is an urgent policy priority within the US. This literature review examines the types of educational training interventions health professional schools have developed from 2015-2020 focused on trans health. This review revealed that the fields of medicine and interprofessional education have created the majority of interventions, which tend to increase students' knowledge, comfort, and confidence working with trans patients. Schools of counseling, social work, and public health are not adequately developing curriculum and interventions that prepare students in health professional schools to work with trans people. Recommendations include schools of medicine developing more faculty expertise in trans medicine, professional organizations requiring trans content on licensure exams, state licensure boards requiring continuing education in trans health, and health professional schools increasing the use of trans standardized patients and trans panels.

Exploring the microaggression experiences of LGBTQ+ community for a culturally safe care: A descriptive qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Microaggressions, stigma and minority stress still occur among sexual and gender minorities on an individual, interpersonal, and structural level. Cultural immersion may therefore be an effective strategy in order to find potential healthcare approaches and foster more comprehensive, critical, intersectional, and inclusive care practices.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop insight into the experiences of LGBTQ+ community members to obtain in-depth perceptions of microaggressions and an understanding of their healthcare needs to provide a culturally safe and sensitive care.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted between September to November 2021.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the University of Almeria with LGBTQ+ community members.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one LGBTQ+ individual participated in this study, aged between 18 and 56 years old.

METHODS

Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling. Responses from semi-structured interviews were studied using a thematic analysis. Methods and findings are reported in line with Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research recommendations.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (i) experiences to understand the impact of a heteronormative society, (ii) perceptions of engaging with health education and promotion, and (iii) healthcare access, use and experiences within the LGTBQ+ community.

CONCLUSIONS

This study yields findings about the difficulties that LGBTQ+ community members face in the healthcare system in order to ensure equal care for vulnerable communities and integrate a culturally safe care approach into nursing practice. Certain microaffirmation strategies against social determinants of health such as school-based nursing strategies can help to raise awareness and knowledge among heterosexual peers and reduce cultural invisibility, microaggressions, stigma and minority stress. In order to provide culturally safe care, educators might also explore the inclusion of gender and sexual minority care content in both in-faculty education and ongoing continuing education for nurse practitioners.

She came to me for care, why would I say no? Survey results of advanced practice nurses caring for transgender and gender diverse patients

BACKGROUND

Literature has recognized deficient knowledge of transgender or gender diverse (TGD) patient needs that can negatively affect health care. Prior research on education has shown little progress responsive to TGD health care needs from nursing. Findings from this demonstrate some improvement, however slight. This study examined the education of family nurse practitioners (FNPs) providing care to TGD patients.

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to describe the relationship between location of practice and TGD patient care and to identify emerging themes related to the care of TGD individuals.

METHODS

Surveys were sent to 3,500 FNPs. Surveys were completed by 356.

RESULTS

No significant results were found between location of practice and TGD patient care or between location of education and TGD curricular inclusion. Statistical significance was found between inclusion of TGD content and participants' year of graduation. Those graduating in or after 2011 were more likely to report receiving content. Themes emerged in four areas related to practice area, role, location, and education. This study highlights inadequacy of curricular inclusion of TGD health needs. Findings underscored ways FNPs sourced best practices to provide health care to TGD people.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

These findings provide additional support for the need to educate FNPs to reduce barriers for TGD persons in accessing affirming health care.

Sexual and Reproductive Health Content in the 3 Ps in Nurse Practitioner Education

BACKGROUND

Nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary care provide sexual and reproductive health care, an integral component of health and well-being. This study explored the degree of inclusion of sexual and reproductive health content in the foundational courses in NP preparation including advanced health assessment, advanced physiology and pathophysiology, and advanced pharmacology, known as the 3 Ps.

METHOD

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 30 NPs in their first 2 years of practice.

RESULTS

Sexual and reproductive health content was well integrated into advanced assessment courses, although participants wanted more comfort and skill with discussing sensitive sexual health issues. Advanced pharmacology and advanced pathophysiology courses were not likely to include the content.

CONCLUSION

Interactive learning opportunities, such as simulation with feedback, promote communication skills with sensitive health issues. Foundational courses would benefit from a deeper understanding of the menstrual cycle, sexual functioning, and medications specific to sexual and reproductive health. [J Nurs Educ. 2022;61(3):131-136.].

Did I learn enough to practice? Reflections of new nurse practitioner graduates in providing sexual and reproductive health care

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Office of Population Health have published guidelines for providing family planning services.

PURPOSE

The study explores how nurse practitioners (NPs) perceived their preparation and competency in providing a range of sexual and reproductive health care in their first two years of community-based practice.

METHODOLOGICAL ORIENTATION

Qualitative. Thematic analysis used to analyze data from structured and open-ended interview questions.

SAMPLE

Through snowballing recruitment, 35 NPs participated in interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants were most confident and likely to provide contraceptive and sexually transmitted infection services. Participants felt less prepared to provide male sexual health and care to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex+ population. Nurse practitioners expressed interest in building skills with discussing healthy sexuality across the life span, specifically postmenopausal sexual concerns, teen sexuality, trauma-informed care related to sexual violence, and early pregnancy decision making. Some participants had little preparation in early pregnancy decision making/options counseling. Faculty need to examine barriers to teaching these skills because the curriculum should address all legal pregnancy options, including discussing the NP's professional obligations. More preparation was needed in the clinical management of erectile dysfunction, polycystic ovary syndrome, herpes, syphilis, abnormal uterine bleeding, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, miscarriage management, and how to discuss prostate cancer screening.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The recommendations of the quality family planning, with additions, form a sound basis for sexual and reproductive health care standards, education, and clinical practice, should be part of NP education.

Severity and Influencing Factors of Homophobia in Korean Nursing Students

Sexual minorities are people with non-cis and non-heterosexual gender identities, including LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) identities. Korean society is prejudiced against sexual minorities—in our study, we will broadly label this prejudice homophobia. It is possible that sexual minorities do not receive appropriate health management owing to such prejudices. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce homophobia in nursing students. This study aims to measure the degree of homophobia in Korean nursing students and identify the factors that affect homophobia. Our study is a cross-sectional study, which surveys attitudes of 265 nursing students toward homophobia in five Korean cities in January to March, 2019. The average homophobia score was 74.5 out of a possible 120; 92.9% of the participants were classified as homophobic, and 42.3% as highly homophobic. We found that participants who were male, religious, had low self-esteem, and had no family members or acquaintances who might belong to a sexual minority group, were more likely to be homophobic. Nursing students in Korea still exhibit high levels of homophobia. As high levels of homophobia can negatively affect health management and nursing, especially in the case of sexual minorities, we suggest that educational programs should be set up to reduce homophobia in nursing students.