Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance

Evaluation of Host Gene Methylation as a Triage Test for HPV-Positive Women-A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a host gene methylation marker panel (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671) in the triage of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women, its possible impact in a cervical cancer screening program, and the possible influence of the variation of the rate of HPV16/18 in its performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cohort study in which consecutive women referred for colposcopy in an organized cervical cancer screening program had repeated HPV testing, colposcopy, and biopsies. The women that remained HPV positive at the time of colposcopy were tested with the panel of DNA methylation markers. The performance of the test was evaluated and compared to standard practice.

RESULTS

The study test had a sensitivity and specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ of 60.8% (49.1-71.6%) and 88.4% (83.2-92.5%), respectively. For CIN3+, it was of 78.0% (64.0-88.5%) and 86.0% (80.8-90.2%), respectively.The rate and level of methylation positively correlated with the severity of disease. The use of methylation reduces the referral for colposcopy to 25.5%, while detecting 78.0% of the CIN3+ cases. Referral of all HPV16/18-positive cases and triage of the other high-risk HPV-positive cases with methylation, detects 90.0% of the cases of CIN3+, while reducing the number of referrals to 43.2%.The variation in the rate of HPV16/18 does not relevantly affect the performance of the methylation panel.

CONCLUSIONS

The studied methylation panel has a high sensitivity and specificity for CIN3+ and reduces the rate of referrals for colposcopy, without relevant variation according to the rate of HPV16/18.

Decoding Fujian's cervical HPV landscape: unmasking dominance of non-16/18 HR-HPV and tailoring prevention strategies at a large scale

Background

Persistent HR-HPV causes cervical cancer, exhibiting geographic variance. Europe/Americas have higher HPV16/18 rates, while Asia/Africa predominantly have non-16/18 HR-HPV. This study in Fujian, Asia, explores non-16/18 HR-HPV infections, assessing their epidemiology and cervical lesion association for targeted prevention.

Methods

A total of 101,621 women undergoing HPV screening at a hospital in Fujian Province from 2013 to 2019 were included. HPV genotyping was performed. A subset of 11,666 HPV-positive women with available histopathology results were analyzed to characterize HPV genotype distribution across cervical diagnoses.

Results

In 101,621 samples, 24.5% tested positive for HPV. Among these samples, 17.3% exhibited single infections, while 7.2% showed evidence of multiple infections. The predominant non-16/18 high-risk HPV types identified were HPV 52, 58, 53, 51, and 81. Single HPV infections accounted for 64.1% of all HPV-positive cases, with 71.4% of these being non-16/18 high-risk HPV infections. Age-related variations were observed in 11,666 HPV-positive patients with pathological results. Cancer patients were older. In the cancer group, HPV52 (21.8%) and HPV58 (18.6%) were the predominant types, followed by HPV33, HPV31, and HPV53. Compared to single HPV16/18 infection, non-16/18 HPV predominated in LSIL. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for LSIL were elevated: multiple HPV16/18 (OR 2.18), multiple non-16/18 HR-HPV (OR 2.53), and multiple LR-HPV (OR 2.38). Notably, solitary HPV16/18 conferred higher odds for HSIL and cancer.

Conclusion

Our large-scale analysis in Fujian Province highlights HPV 52, 58, 53, 51, and 81 as predominant non-16/18 HR-HPV types. Multiple HPV poses increased LSIL risks, while solitary HPV16/18 elevates HSIL and cancer odds. These findings stress tailored cervical cancer prevention, highlighting specific HPV impacts on lesion severity and guiding region-specific strategies for optimal screening in Asia, emphasizing ongoing surveillance in the vaccination era.

Late Stage at Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer and Its Correlates at a Large Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background The stage of disease at diagnosis is one of the major determinants of survival in women with cervical cancer. Most women with cervical cancer in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) present to hospitals with advanced stages, thus reducing their survivorship following the diagnosis. Factors correlated with late-stage disease at diagnosis are not completely explored. This study aimed to describe the association between sociodemographic, clinical, and metabolic characteristics with late-stage disease at diagnosis in women with cervical cancer attending the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Southwestern Uganda. Methodology We conducted a cross-sectional study of women with histological diagnoses of invasive cervical cancer between November 2022 and August 2023. Women who presented to the hospital with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIb and above were considered to have late-stage cervical cancer while those with stage IIa and below were considered to have early-stage disease. We used modified Poisson regression to determine the factors independently associated with the outcome. Results We enrolled 157 women. The average age of the participants was 52.4 years. The majority of the participants (83.4%) had late-stage disease at diagnosis. Women with adenocarcinoma (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10-1.38) and those with lymphovascular space involvement on histology (aPR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.05-1.60) were more likely to have late-stage disease at diagnosis while women living with human immunodeficiency virus (aPR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.97) were less likely to present with late-stage disease at diagnosis. None of the sociodemographic and metabolic characteristics were associated with late-stage disease at diagnosis. Conclusions The number of women presenting with late-stage cervical cancer is high. Efforts to increase the availability and uptake of cervical cancer screening services in LMICs should be reinforced. Cervical cancer treatment services should be decentralized to increase accessibility.

Analysis of the diagnostic performance of PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation in cervical precancerous lesions and its role in triage diagnosis

Methylation panels, tools for investigating epigenetic changes associated with diseases like cancer, can identify DNA methylation patterns indicative of disease, providing diagnostic or prognostic insights. However, the application of methylation panels focusing on the sex-determining region Y-box 1 (SOX1) and paired box gene 1 (PAX1) genes for diagnosing cervical lesions is under-researched. This study aims to examine the diagnostic performance of PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation as a marker for cervical precancerous lesions and its potential application in triage diagnosis. From September 2022 to April 2023, 181 patients with abnormal HPV-DNA tests or cytological exam results requiring colposcopy were studied at Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital, China. Data were collected from colposcopy, cytology, HPV-DNA tests, and PAX1/SOX1 methylation detection. Patients were categorized as control, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 1 (CIN1), Grade 2 (CIN2), Grade 3 (CIN3), and cervical cancer (CC) groups based on histopathology. We performed HPV testing, liquid-based cytology, and PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation testing. We evaluated the diagnostic value of methylation detection in cervical cancer using DNA methylation positivity rate, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), and explored its potential for triage diagnosis. PAX1/SOX1 methylation positivity rates were: control 17.1%, CIN1 22.5%, CIN2 100.0%, CIN3 90.0%, and CC 100.0%. The AUC values for PAX1 gene methylation detection in diagnosing CIN1+, CIN2+, and CIN3+ were 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.62), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97), and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00), respectively. Corresponding AUC values for SOX1 gene methylation detection were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.40-0.58), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.811-1.00), respectively. In HPV16/18-negative patients, methylation detection showed sensitivity of 32.4% and specificity of 83.7% for CIN1+. For CIN2+ and CIN3+, sensitivity was all 100%, with specificities of 83.0% and 81.1%. Among the patients who underwent colposcopy examination, 166 cases had cytological examination results ≤ASCUS, of which 37 cases were positive for methylation, and the colposcopy referral rate was 22.29%. PAX1/SOX1 gene methylation detection exhibits strong diagnostic efficacy for cervical precancerous lesions and holds significant value in triage diagnosis.

Utilization of PAX1 methylation test for cervical cancer screening of non-HPV16/18 high-risk HPV infection in women

Aim: To evaluate the clinical performance of PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) and cytology for patients with non-HPV16/18 high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. Methods: Cervical exfoliated cells from 387 outpatients with non-HPV16/18 hrHPV - positive were collected for cytology and PAX1m assays. Results: The PAX1m level increased with the severity of cytology and histopathology. For cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)CIN2+/CIN3+, the areas under the curve were both 0.87. The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of PAX1m were greater than abnormal cytology (CIN2+ specificity: 75.5 vs 24.8%; PPV: 38.8 vs 18.7%; CIN3+ specificity: 69.3 vs 22.7%; PPV: 14.0 vs 6.7%). Conclusion: PAX1m increased specificity and PPV for CIN2+/CIN3+ compared with cytology for women with non-HPV16/18 hrHPV (+).

HPV Testing and its Role in Cervical Cancer Screening

The recognition that persistent infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical precancer and cancer has led to the introduction of HPV testing into cervical cancer screening, either as a primary screening test or in conjunction with cervical cytology (i.e., co-testing). HPV testing has much higher sensitivity for detection of cervical precancer and provides greater long-term reassurance if negative compared to cytology. However, most HPV infections are transient, and do not progress to invasive cancer, thus triage tests are required to identify individuals who should be referred to colposcopy for diagnostic evaluation. This chapter begins with a description of the biology, natural history, and epidemiology of HPV as a foundation for understanding the role of HPV in cervical carcinogenesis. This section is followed by a detailed discussion regarding the introduction of HPV-based testing and triage into cervical cancer screening and management. Summarized triage tests include cervical cytology, HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual stain, and HPV and cellular methylation markers. The final section of this chapter includes an important discussion on cervical cancer disparities, particularly within the United States, followed by concluding remarks.

Could HPV Type 33 Be More Risky Than We Thought?

Objective: The distribution of human papilloma virus (HPV) genotypes varies by country and region. HPV is the most important risk factor for cervical cancer and HPV 16/18 is the most common genotype. Other high risk HPVs (hrHPVs) other than HPV 16 and 18 contribute significantly to invasive disease. In this study, we aimed to reveal the frequency of association of HPV 16, 18 and other high-risk-HPV types with CIN 2 + (CIN 2 and above) cervical lesions in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and to support the literature especially on the management of high-risk-HPV types other than 16 and 18. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study, which was conducted on 264 patients and 202 patients after the exclusion criteria, was conducted in the gynecology oncology outpatient clinic of the tertiary care hospital between March 2020 and May 2022. HPV 16, HPV 18 and other high-risk-HPV types with negative cytology between the ages of 25-65 were compared by taking a biopsy accompanied by colposcopy performed by the same gynecologist. As a result of colposcopy, CIN2 + patients who underwent excisional procedure were distributed according to HPV type. During this procedure, the patients who were positive for more than one HPV type were considered positive for the group with all subtypes (For example, if the patient was type 31 and 33 positive, they were included in both the 31 and 33 positive groups). The genotype distribution in the high-risk-HPV group was examined. Results: Colposcopy results showed HPV 16 positivity in 43.3%, HPV 33 positivity in 30% and HPV 18 positivity in 10% of the patients with CIN2 + and above lesions. It was observed that the incidence of CIN2 + lesions in the patients with HPV 33 positive was higher than the incidence of a lower-grade lesion (such as CIN1, chronic cervicitis) (p < 0.05). While HPV 33 (r = 0.290, p < 0.000) results were positively correlated with CIN2 + and above lesions, there was a negative correlation with HPV 45 (r = - 0.172, p < 0.015) results (p < 0.05). It was observed that HPV 33 and HPV 45 positivity was a statistically significant variable in predicting the probability of CIN2 + lesions in colposcopy results. It was determined that a HPV 33 positive patient increased the probability of having a CIN2 + lesion by 4.999 times (p < 0.000). Conclusion: In the literature, the role of high-risk -HPV types other than HPV 16 and HPV 18 with negative cytology in the women at risk of cervical preinvasive lesions has still not been fully determined. According to the results of the stuy, especially in women infected with high-risk -HPV types other than HPV 16/18, the relationship between HPV 33 type and CIN 2 + lesions was found to be high, and it was seen that colposcopic biopsy should be performed immediately instead of follow-up after 1 year.

Significant outcomes associated with high-risk human papillomavirus negative Papanicolaou tests

INTRODUCTION

The 2020 American Cancer Society guidelines preferred primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for cervical cancer prevention. Studies investigating the role of cytology in detection of cervical precancer/cancer have focused on high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse interpretations. Here, we have examined the significance of all those cytology results that require histologic follow-up as per the current management guidelines, regardless of the HPV test result.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A database search (September 2010 to December 2019) retrieved cervical Papanicolaou tests with any of the following interpretations: ≥ atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude HSIL or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HSIL cannot be excluded, and ≥ atypical glandular cells, not otherwise specified and its subcategories. Of these, those with concurrent negative HPV test result were included for further analysis. For this cohort, relevant clinical history and histologic follow-up (within 1 year) were recorded.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 763 patients. Of them, 586 (76.8%) patients had histologic follow-up: 53 (9.0%) had ≥ HSIL/adenocarcinoma in situ; of which, 43 (81.1%) had prior abnormal cytology/histology/not otherwise specified history and/or HPV positivity, and 66 (11.3%) had HPV-unassociated neoplasia; of which, 60 (90.9%) had a known diagnosis or clinical signs/symptoms of the disease.

CONCLUSION

With widespread adoption of risk-based approach to management, the role of cytology, by itself, will likely diminish in the detection of HPV-associated lesions. Additional data regarding the role of cytology in the screening of patients with no/unknown/limited history and in the detection/management of HPV-independent lesions may be helpful for designing future screening guidelines.

The Value of MicroRNA-375 Detection for Triaging Primary Human Papillomavirus Positive Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in a General Population

PURPOSE

This study aims to validate the value of microRNA (miRNA) detection for triaging human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women in the general population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

miR-375 detection in cervical exfoliated cells has been demonstrated to have the superior value to cytology in triaging primary HPV-positive women in the hospital population. In this study, residual samples of cervical exfoliated cells from 10,951 women in a general population were used to detect miRNA. The performance efficiency of miRNA detection in identifying high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was evaluated. Pearson chi-square test and McNemar pairing test were used to compare miRNA detection and cytology.

RESULTS

In valid 9,972 women aged 25-65, miR-375 expression showed a downward trend along with an increase in cervical lesion severity. The expression level of miR-375 ≤1.0 × 10-3 was identified as positive. In the HPV-positive and 12 HPV genotypes other than 16/18 (HR12)-positive women, miR-375 detection showed equivalent sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to that of cytology (≥ASC-US) and higher or similar sensitivity and NPV but lower specificity and PPV than that of cytology (≥ASC-H) in identifying CIN3+ and CIN2+. In HPV 16-positive women, miR-375 positivity had higher sensitivity and NPV but lower specificity and PPV than that of cytology (≥ASC-H and HSIL) in identifying CIN3+ and CIN2+. The immediate CIN3+ risk of miR-375 positivity was 19.8% (61/308) in HPV-positive, 10.8% (22/204) in HR12-positive, and 43.5% (37/85) in HPV16-positive women, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The detection of miR-375 in cervical exfoliated cells may be an optional method for triaging primary HPV-positive women in population-based cervical cancer screening.

Lead time on confirmatory test after abnormal Pap test in the COVID-19 era

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there are concerns about medical delay, including confirmatory tests after screening for various cancers. We evaluated the lead time to a confirmatory test after an abnormal screening Papanicolaou (Pap) test in women before the COVID-19 period and during the COVID-19 period.The medical records of 1144 women who underwent colposcopy at a single institution located in Seoul after abnormal Pap results from January 2019 to December 2020 were reviewed. The lead time to colposcopy from the Pap test between 2019 and 2020 was compared; the adverse factors for a long lead time to colposcopy were also evaluated.Age, residence, institution, and the Pap results did not differ between women who underwent colposcopy in 2019 (n = 621) and 2020 (n = 523). The time to colposcopy from the Pap test was also not different. A higher number of women were diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia in 2020 and underwent excision procedures; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Instead, patients' residence, institution of the Pap test, and results of the Pap test were associated with a long lead time to colposcopy of >6 weeks.The lead time to colposcopy from the abnormal Pap test was not delayed in the COVID-19 era compared to before. However, regional factors could affect a long lead time.

HPV Screening Test for the Detection of Precancerous Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer in Israeli Women

OBJECTIVES

This work is aimed to summarize the first year of the high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) screening test and compare it to the cytology screening test, regarding positivity rates and premalignant lesions diagnosed in the Israeli population. A specific consideration is for the age group 25-30 that is not considered mandatory for the HPV primary screening testing.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in women who were screened for prevention of cervical cancer in Maccabi HealthCare HMO from March 2017 to March 2019. Screening methods included hrHPV typing for types 16, 18, and the other 12 hrHPV types and the PAP LBC test.

RESULTS

A total of 115,807 cervical samples were tested for HPV presence and 91% (105,225) were found negative for hrHPV. The other 9% (10,582) were positive for one or more of the 14 hrHPV types tested, and 37% (3,916) of them showed abnormal PAP LBC results. In the age group of 25-30, 3,104 (17.5%) women were found positive for hr-HPV (825 had hrHPV types 16 and/or 18), of which 42% (1,293) of them showed abnormal PAP LBC results. During the hrHPV versus PAP LBC screening era, 258 more women were diagnosed with precancerous cervical lesions (CIN2/3), 70% increased detection versus cytology screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The hrHPV screening test is currently the best method for the detection of precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer, and it is better started at age 25.

Accuracy and Efficiency of Deep-Learning-Based Automation of Dual Stain Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening

Background

With the advent of primary human papillomavirus testing followed by cytology for cervical cancer screening, visual interpretation of cytology slides remains the last subjective analysis step and suffers from low sensitivity and reproducibility.

Methods

We developed a cloud-based whole-slide imaging platform with a deep-learning classifier for p16/Ki-67 dual-stained (DS) slides trained on biopsy-based gold standards. We compared it with conventional Pap and manual DS in 3 epidemiological studies of cervical and anal precancers from Kaiser Permanente Northern California and the University of Oklahoma comprising 4253 patients. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

In independent validation at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, artificial intelligence (AI)-based DS had lower positivity than cytology (P < .001) and manual DS (P < .001) with equal sensitivity and substantially higher specificity compared with both Pap (P < .001) and manual DS (P < .001), respectively. Compared with Pap, AI-based DS reduced referral to colposcopy by one-third (41.9% vs 60.1%, P < .001). At a higher cutoff, AI-based DS had similar performance to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology, indicating a risk high enough to allow for immediate treatment. The classifier was robust, showing comparable performance in 2 cytology systems and in anal cytology.

Conclusions

Automated DS evaluation removes the remaining subjective component from cervical cancer screening and delivers consistent quality for providers and patients. Moving from Pap to automated DS substantially reduces the number of colposcopies and also achieves excellent performance in a simulated fully vaccinated population. Through cloud-based implementation, this approach is globally accessible. Our results demonstrate that AI not only provides automation and objectivity but also delivers a substantial benefit for women by reduction of unnecessary colposcopies.

Validation of cobas 4800 HPV assay in SurePath Papanicolaou specimens for cervical cancer screening

INTRODUCTION

The cobas (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) HPV assay was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in SurePath (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) Papanicolaou specimens for cervical cancer prevention. To validate the cobas HPV assay in SurePath specimens in our institution, we compared its accuracy and clinical efficacy to that of the Cervista (Hologic, Marlborough, MA) HPV HR assay.

METHODS

This study used 138 Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology specimens collected in SurePath preservative fluid at our institution in 2018. After Pap cytology testing, the residual specimens were split for testing with the cobas and Cervista assays. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV testing (GP5+/GP6+) was performed on specimens with discrepant results. Clinical follow-up data were reviewed.

RESULTS

The cobas HPV and Cervista HPV HR assays showed good concordance (89.1%), with a kappa value of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.675-0.885). Fifteen specimens showed discrepant results between the 2 assays. Of 7 cases with cobas+/Cervista- results, 5 (71%) were confirmed positive by PCR. Of 8 cases with cobas-/Cervista+ results, 4 (50%) were confirmed positive by PCR. cobas HPV and Cervista HPV HR showed the same HPV-positive rate in cases of pathologically diagnosed ASC-H, LSIL, or HSIL. The sensitivities and specificities for detecting high-risk HPV of cobas HPV (93.7%, 97.3%) and Cervista HPV HR (92.1%, 94.7%) were comparable. The cobas HPV assay had false-negative results in 4 cases (5.2%) including 1 false-negative case that failed to predict CIN3.

CONCLUSIONS

The cobas HPV assay is valid in SurePath Pap cytology specimens for cervical cancer screening but has limitations of false-negative results with clinical implications.

The meaning of high-risk HPV other than type 16/18 in women with negative cytology: Is it really safe to wait for 1 year?

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a primary risk factor for cervical cancer. HPV 16 and 18 are the two most carcinogenic genotypes and have been reported in the majority of cervical cancer. High-risk HPVs (hrHPVs) other than HPV 16/18 cause approximately a quarter of cervical cancers. We aimed to present the colposcopy-guided biopsy results of non-16/18 hrHPV-infected women with negative cytology.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted on 752 patients between the ages of 30-65 years with non-16/18 hrHPV and negative cytology undergoing colposcopy-guided biopsy at a tertiary gynecological cancer center between January-2016 and January-2019.

RESULTS

The mean age of the women was 42.35±9.41 years. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ lesion was detected in 49 (6.5%) women with negative cytology. The rate of CIN 2+ lesions in women with abnormal cytology was 12.8%. Patients with abnormal cytology had about 2.1 and 2.4 times increased the odds of CIN 2+ lesion in cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage specimens, respectively. CIN 3+ lesion was detected in 20 (2.7%) women with negative cytology. One (0.1%) of the patients with HPV 39 and negative cytology had invasive cervical cancer. The two most common HPV subtypes were HPV 31 and HPV 51.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of cervical preinvasive lesions still can be detected and cannot be completely eliminated among hrHPV other than 16/18-infected women with negative cytology. Based on the results of this study, referral of non-16/18 hrHPV-infected women with negative cytology to colposcopy is supported as a credible and feasible strategy.

Options for triage and implications for colposcopists within European HPV-based cervical screening programmes

The development of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening should detect more pre-cancerous changes and so reduce the incidence and mortality from cervical squamous carcinoma and cervical adenocarcinoma. However, many more women are high risk HPV (hrHPV) screen positive compared to cytology-based screening, especially in younger age-women. A variety of tests have become available which may triage into those hrHPV test-positive women who need immediate referral to colposcopy from those who need early repeat HPV tests or recall on the basis of their disease status. We performed a literature review of publications and a manual search from 2010, reporting cytology, HPV partial genotyping, dual-staining and DNA methylation for triage of hrHPV positive tests, including their comparative performance between these methods as well as the effectiveness of some triage combinations with reference to HPV-based screening services in Europe. Cost effectiveness and the structure of triage algorithms for colposcopists also have been considered. From one report evaluating four options for triage as single options or as combined algorithms, partial genotyping for HPV 16 and 18 with dual-staining yielded the highest risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade three or worse within an HPV positive population and with an acceptable colposcopy rate. From a separate paper, this option appeared cost effective. However, publications were difficult to compare objectively. All options have their merits but a combination triage involving any two of cytology, HPV partial genotyping or dual-staining seems most efficient at present. HPV vaccination may impact upon the performance of future partial genotyping. DNA Methylation may become an acceptable future option.

Assessing Physician Adherence to Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Screening Results

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to survey obstetrician-gynecologists' cervical cancer screening practices and management of cervical abnormalities to ascertain adherence to guidelines.

METHODS

From January to July 2019, obstetrician-gynecologists at 5 St. Louis area hospitals were surveyed online about cervical cancer screening and management practices through 13 clinical vignettes. Survey scores and the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) app use were compared using Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

When screening 30- to 65-year-old participants, 114 (98%) of the 116 total participants used co-testing, but only 71 (61%) screened at 5-year intervals. None used primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. For 21- to 29-year-old participants, 17 (15%) screened with annual cytology, whereas 14 (12%) used annual or every 3-year co-testing. Forty eight (41%) screened younger than 21 years, regardless of risk factors or only if immunocompromised. Eleven (9%) continued screening after total hysterectomy for benign indications. Only 2 (2%) responded to all clinical vignettes in adherence to guidelines. More than 30% of participants would pursue unnecessary HPV testing and/or loop electrosurgical excision procedure for persistent low-grade cytology. Fifty eight (48%) incorrectly reported hysterectomy as management for adenocarcinoma in situ on biopsy. Participants would undertreat young women with high-grade abnormalities including high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (48, 41%) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (65, 56%). Forty one (35%) reported exiting women from screening prematurely. The median score for participants using the ASCCP app was significantly greater than those who did not (79% vs 71%, p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Midwestern obstetrician-gynecologists' adherence to the guidelines for cervical cancer screening and management of abnormal results is suboptimal. Although co-testing for women aged 30-65 years has been broadly adopted, primary HPV testing has not. Physicians overscreen, overtreat low-grade lesions, and undertreat high-grade lesions in young women.

The Cervical Dysplasia Worksheet: A Longitudinal Map of Cervical Dysplasia Cytology and Histology Tests and Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Our objectives were to describe the Cervical Dysplasia Worksheet (CDW), provide evidence of its feasibility to view patient cervical dysplasia results over time, and evaluate patient attitudes toward the tool in the setting of abnormal result follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CDW augments the ASCCP guidelines for managing abnormal cervical cancer screenings by visually depicting cervical cytological and histological history along a color gradient showing severity. We evaluated tool feasibility by graphing a retrospectively reviewed convenience sample of patient data. A cross-sectional evaluation of the tool was then performed to assess patient attitudes in the setting of either dysplasia or colposcopy clinic. Patients had their data graphed on the CDW and explained to them before their clinical encounter. They then gave general comments about the tool and filled out a short evaluation survey.

RESULTS

The large majority of retrospective patient data (N = 167) fit well within the CDW with roughly 20% requiring space for additional comments. Among the 30 patients who participated in our evaluation, almost all agreed (n = 29, 96.7%) that the tool helped them understand their history and results and that they would use the tool in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDW is a novel tool to display a patient's cervical dysplasia history to visualize treatment and future care while enhancing patient-provider communication. Patient evaluation of the tool was largely positive, and suggestions will be taken into consideration for future modification. Further evaluation of the CDW among healthcare providers is needed to analyze its efficacy in the clinical setting.

Trends in High-grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer Screening in 5 States, 2008-2015

BACKGROUND

We describe changes in rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2, 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+) during a period of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake and changing cervical cancer screening recommendations.

METHODS

We conducted population-based laboratory surveillance for CIN2+ in catchment areas in 5 states, 2008-2015. We calculated age-specific CIN2+ rates per 100000 women by age groups. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of CIN2+ for 2-year periods among all women and among screened women to evaluate changes over time.

RESULTS

A total of 16572 CIN2+ cases were reported. Among women aged 18-20 and 21-24 years, CIN2+ rates declined in all sites, whereas in women aged 25-29, 30-34, and 35-39 years, trends differed across sites. The percent of women screened annually declined in all sites and age groups. Compared to 2008-2009, rates among screened women were significantly lower for all 3 periods in women aged 18-20 years (2010-2011: IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.99; 2012-2013: IRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85; 2014-2015: IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.68) and lower for the latter 2 time periods in women aged 21-24 years (2012-2013: IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; 2014-2015: IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2008-2015, both CIN2+ rates and cervical cancer screening declined in women aged 18-24 years. The significant decreases in CIN2+ rates among screened women aged 18-24 years are consistent with a population-level impact of HPV vaccination.

5-Year Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, Human Papillomavirus Testing, and Biomarkers for Detection of Anal Precancer in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related biomarkers have shown good cross-sectional performance for anal precancer detection in human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) men who have sex with men (MSM). However, the long-term performance and risk stratification of these biomarkers are unknown. Here, we prospectively evaluated high-risk (HR) HPV DNA, HPV16/18 genotyping, HPV E6/E7 messenger RNA (mRNA), and p16/Ki-67 dual stain in a population of HIV+ MSM.

METHODS

We enrolled 363 HIV+ MSM between 2009-2010, with passive follow-up through 2015. All had anal cytology and a high-resolution anoscopy at baseline. For each biomarker, we calculated the baseline sensitivity and specificity for a combined endpoint of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (HSIL/AIN2+), and we estimated the 2- and 5-year cumulative risks of HSIL/AIN2+ using logistic and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

There were 129 men diagnosed with HSIL/AIN2+ during the study. HR-HPV testing had the highest positivity and sensitivity of all assays, but the lowest specificity. HPV16/18 and HPV E6/E7 mRNA had high specificity, but lower sensitivity. The 2- and 5-year risks of HSIL/AIN2+ were highest for those testing HPV16/18- or HPV E6/E7 mRNA-positive, followed by those testing dual stain-positive. Those testing HR-HPV- or dual stain-negative had the lowest 2- and 5-year risks of HSIL/AIN2+.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-related biomarkers provide long-term risk stratification for anal precancers. HR-HPV- and dual stain-negativity indicate a low risk of HSIL/AIN2+ for at least 2 years, compared with negative anal cytology; however, the high positivity of HR-HPV in HIV+ MSM may limit its utility for surveillance and management in this population.

Study on the correlation between hTREC and HPV load and cervical CINI/II/III lesions and cervical cancer

Objective

To investigate the correlation between hTREC and human papillomavirus (HPV) load and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II/III lesions and cervical cancer.

Methods

A total of 135 patients with cervical lesions of different degrees admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to February 2017 were selected, including CIN I/III 65 cases, grade III 39 cases, and cervical cancer 31 cases. The expression of hTERC gene was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in three groups, and the HPV load was detected by second‐generation hybridization capture (HC II) method, and its relationship with cervical lesion grade was analyzed. Department.

Results

The positive expression rate of hTERC gene amplification was cervical cancer > CIN I/II lesion > CIN III lesion; the positive expression rate of HPV was cervical cancer > CIN I/II lesion > CIN III lesion. After treatment, the positive rate of hTERC gene amplification and HPV expression decreased significantly within 1 year (P < .05). Spearman's analysis showed that the degree of cervical lesion was positively correlated with hTREC and HPV load (P < .05).

Conclusion

hTREC and HPV are closely related to the occurrence and development of cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer. The abnormal amplification of hTERC gene increases with the grade of cervical lesions. Both of them can be used as auxiliary indicators for early screening, treatment, and prognosis of cervical cancer.

Clinical Performance of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Testing versus Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of a Large Danish Implementation Study

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is increasingly used as the primary cervical cancer screening test. In a large pilot implementation, we compared participation, referrals and detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in HPV- versus cytology-based cervical cancer screening.

Methods

The implementation was embedded into the routine screening program at Lillebaelt Hospital, Department of Pathology, Vejle, Denmark. Based on the area of residence, women aged 30–59 years were screened by either HPV testing (with HPV16/18 genotyping and cytology triage) or cytology (with HPV triage for minor abnormalities). Our analysis includes women invited or screened during May 2017–May 2018 (invited: n=35,081; screened: n=28,352) with 6 months of follow-up. Information on screening results and sociodemographic characteristics were obtained from registers. Using logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of participation, referral and CIN3+-detection in HPV- versus cytology-based screening, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results

Participation was virtually identical in the HPV- and cytology group (58.4% vs 58.8%; OR_adjusted=0.97, 95% CI, 0.93–1.01). Referral to colposcopy was more common in the HPV- than cytology group (3.8% vs 2.1%; OR_adjusted=1.88, 95% CI, 1.63–2.17). More cases of CIN3+ were detected in the HPV- than cytology group (1.0% vs 0.7%, OR_adjusted=1.47; 95% CI, 1.13–1.91).

Conclusion

Participation did not differ between HPV- and cytology-based screening. HPV-based screening detected more cases of CIN3+, but in this initial screening round also led to more colposcopies than cytology-based screening.

Clinical performance of Onclarity HPV assay and Cobas HPV test in detection of cervical precancer and cancer in Chinese women

OBJECTIVE

The Roche Cobas (Cobas) and BD Onclarity (Onclarity) human papillomavirus (HPV) assays are convenient, PCR-based, HPV DNA tests; currently, data on performance of Onclarity in Chinese women is limited. We aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of Onclarity for detecting cervical lesions in Chinese women.

METHODS

In total, 1122 women were enrolled into this study. Exfoliated cervical cells were collected in PreservCyt medium and were tested using Cobas and Onclarity. Cytology and histology were interpreted by senior cytologists and a panel of pathologists, respectively, at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

RESULTS

The assays showed excellent concordance for HPV16 (kappa = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97) and for 12 other high-risk types (HPV31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, kappa = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78-0.90), and very good concordance for HPV18 (kappa = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.81). No difference for ≥CIN2 sensitivity was observed between Onclarity and Cobas (both 90.5%); and the <CIN2 specificity for detection was similar between Onclarity (84.2%, 95% CI: 81.6-86.4) and Cobas (80.4%, 95% CI: 77.6-82.8). When combined with cytology triage, the colposcopy referral rate point estimate was slightly lower for Onclarity (9.0%) than for Cobas (11.0%), with the same ≥CIN2 sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI: 53.1-88.8) for Onclarity and Cobas.

CONCLUSIONS

Onclarity exhibited comparable screening performance and triage efficiency compared to Cobas in detection of cervical lesions in Chinese women.

Outcomes in women with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or normal cervix and related cofactors: A 15-year population-based cohort study from China

OBJECTIVE

To estimate long-term outcomes of biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) or normal cervix and identify the cofactors during disease progression.

METHODS

In 1999, a cervical cancer screening cohort in Shanxi, China, enrolled 1997 women aged 35-45. They were followed up at year 6, 11, and 15 after enrollment with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA testing, liquid-based cytology, and visual inspection with acetic acid. Progression, persistence, and regression rates were calculated, stratified by baseline hrHPV and cytological status. Risk factors associated with hrHPV acquisition, persistence, and progression were examined.

RESULTS

The cumulative rates of progression to CIN2+ among CIN1 over 6, 11, and 15 years were 7.5%, 21.4%, and 24.0%, respectively; the regression rates to normal cervix were 85.0%, 76.7%, and 72.9%, respectively. Over 6, 11, and 15 years, 0.7%, 2.9%, and 5.2% of normal cervix developed CIN2+, respectively, but over 90% remained normal after 15 years. CIN1 or normal cervix positive for hrHPV had significantly higher progression rates to CIN2+ than those without hrHPV. Similarly, the severity of cytological status was found to be associated with an increased risk of developing CIN2+. Women who had an earlier sexual debut were at a higher risk of acquiring new HPV infection and repeated HPV infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical follow-up strategies for women with CIN1 or normal cervix could be adjusted accordingly based on hrHPV/cytology status.

Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is by far the most common HPV-related disease. About 99.7% of cervical cancer cases are caused by persistent genital high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Worldwide, cervical cancer is one of the most common cancer in women with an estimated 528,000 new cases reported in 2012. Most HPV infections clear spontaneously but persistent infection with the oncogenic or high-risk types may cause cancer of the oropharynx and anogenital regions. The virus usually infects the mucocutaneous epithelium and produces viral particles in matured epithelial cells and then causes a disruption in normal cell-cycle control and the promotion of uncontrolled cell division leading to the accumulation of genetic damage. There are currently two effective prophylactic vaccines against HPV infection, and these comprise of HPV types 16 and 18, and HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 virus-like particles. HPV testing in the secondary prevention of cervical cancer is clinically valuable in triaging low-grade cytological abnormalities and is also more sensitive than cytology as a primary screening. If these prevention strategies can be implemented in both developed and developing countries, many thousands of lives could be saved.

Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is by far the most common HPV-related disease. About 99.7% of cervical cancer cases are caused by persistent genital high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Worldwide, cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women with an estimated 528,000 new cases reported in 2012. Most HPV infections clear spontaneously but persistent infection with the oncogenic or high-risk types may cause cancer of the oropharynx and anogenital regions. The virus usually infects the mucocutaneous epithelium and produces viral particles in matured epithelial cells and then causes a disruption in normal cell-cycle control and the promotion of uncontrolled cell division leading to the accumulation of genetic damage. There are currently two effective prophylactic vaccines against HPV infection, and these comprise of HPV types 16 and 18, and HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 virus-like particles. HPV testing in the secondary prevention of cervical cancer is clinically valuable in triaging low-grade cytological abnormalities and is also more sensitive than cytology as a primary screening. If these prevention strategies can be implemented in both developed and developing countries, many thousands of lives could be saved.

Developing and validating the Personal Risk of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus infection score in US Women

BACKGROUND

Determining risk scores for genital high-risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) infection in women will support more efficient cervical cancer screening strategies.

OBJECTIVE

We developed and validated point scores to predict the likelihood of any genital HRHPV infection in women.

METHODS

We conducted the cross-sectional analysis in 2017 and used data from the 2005-14 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (7337 women aged 25-59 years; 6300 women aged 30-59 years). Predictors were reproductive health practices, risk behaviors and demographic variables. The outcome was a positive result for any of the 21 genital HRHPV genotypes. The 2005-12 cohorts were used as training and testing sets to develop scores that best classified women into three risk groups: low risk (<20%), average risk (20-30%) and high risk (>30%). The 2013-14 cohort was used to validate the final scores.

RESULTS

Two-point scores with six self-reported variables were created to predict any HRHPV risks for the two age groups: the Personal Risk of Oncogenic HPV (PRO-HPV25) for women aged 25-59 years old and PRO-HPV30 for women aged 30-59 years old. The scores were successfully prospectively validated, with good calibration with regards to the predicted and observed rates of HRHPV infection. The scores had fair discrimination (c-statistics: 0.67-0.68).

CONCLUSION

The PRO-HPV risk scores can identify groups at low, average and high risk of genital HRHPV infection. This information can be used to prioritize women for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings or to personalize screening intervals.

CIN2+ detection of the HPV DNA Array genotyping assay in comparison with the Cobas 4800 HPV test and cytology

Background

HPV DNA Array is an E1-targeting PCR genotyping test, with capability of distinguishing 18 high-risk (16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73, 82) and 11 low-risk HPV types (6, 11, 40, 42, 44, 54, 67, 69, 70, 85, 97). HPV DNA Array uses multiplex PCR for E1-gene sequence amplification. The amplicons are detected and genotyped by reverse hybridization to immobilized DNA probes spotted as triplets in single 96 well-plate wells and read by AID ELISPOT reader.

Methods

Aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the assay against internationally accepted and FDA approved Cobas 4800 HPV test (Roche Diagnostics). Study population comprised of 500 cervical samples.

Results

HPV DNA Array demonstrated a very high sensitivity of 100% for CIN2+ and 100% for CIN3+ detection, same as Cobas 4800. HPV DNA Array showed greater sensitivity for CIN2+ detection than cytology (100% vs. 13.6%). The agreement to Cobas 4800 for HPV detection, irrespective of type, was 81.4% with κ = 0.613. The agreement for HPV 16 was 92.8% (κ = 0.929), and for HPV 18 54.2% (κ = 0.681).

Conclusion

HPV DNA Array demonstrated good clinical performance for detection of high-grade lesions, and may be considered for usage in a screening setting.

Clinical Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Screening With p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Triage in a Large Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program

IMPORTANCE

As cervical cancer screening transitions from Papanicolaou cytologic screening to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing worldwide, effective triage tests are needed to decide who among the HPV-positive women should receive further diagnostic evaluation to avoid unnecessary colposcopies and biopsies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the p16/Ki-67 dual stain (DS) and HPV16/18 genotyping for the triage of HPV-positive women.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective observational study was conducted within the cervical cancer screening program at Kaiser Permanente Northern California of 3225 HPV-positive women undergoing HPV and Papanicolaou cytologic testing with a valid DS result from September 16 to October 31, 2015, with follow-up through December 31, 2018.

EXPOSURES

Human papillomavirus screening with partial genotyping and cytologic triage compared with DS triage.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more severe (CIN3+) and grade 2 or more severe (CIN2+), diagnosed within 3 years after sample collection.

RESULTS

A total of 3225 women (mean [SD] age, 37.9 [11.3] years) participated in the study. For triage of HPV-positive women with partial genotyping, DS showed better risk stratification for CIN3+ than did Papanicolaou cytologic testing, with women with positive DS results having a higher risk than women with positive Papanicolaou test results for CIN3+ (218 of 1818 [12.0%; 95% CI, 10.5%-13.5%] vs 219 of 2128 [10.3%; 95% CI, 9.0%-11.6%]; P = .005). Similarly, DS showed better risk stratification for CIN3+ compared with Papanicolaou cytologic testing in HPV-positive women, irrespective of genotyping. The greatest reassurance against CIN3+ was observed in HPV16/18-negative women with negative DS results, with a risk low enough to extend retesting intervals. Dual stain triage strategies required substantially fewer colposcopies per detection of CIN3+ compared with Papanicolaou cytologic testing, with a 32.1% (859 of 2677) reduction of colposcopies compared with the currently recommended triage strategy of HPV screening with Papanicolaou cytologic testing. Results for CIN2+ were very similar.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Triage of HPV-positive women with DS was superior to Papanicolaou cytologic testing in this study, demonstrating equal immediate detection of precancerous lesions and substantially reduced referral to colposcopy. These findings suggest that DS can safely replace Papanicolaou cytologic testing as a triage strategy for primary HPV screening, and that retesting intervals in HPV16/18-negative women with negative DS results can be safely extended to 3 years.

Screening for Human Papillomavirus in a Low- and Middle-Income Country

PURPOSE

Low- and middle-income countries have high incidences of cervical cancer linked to human papillomavirus (HPV), and without resources for cancer screenings these countries bear 85% of all cervical cancer cases. To address some of these needs, brigade-style screening combined with sensitive polymerase chain reaction–based HPV testing to detect common high-risk HPV genotypes may be necessary.

METHODS

We deployed an inexpensive DNA extraction technique and a real-time polymerase chain reaction–based HPV genotyping assay, as well as Papanicolaou testing, in a factory in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, where 1,732 women were screened for cervical cancer.

RESULTS

We found that 28% of participants were positive for high-risk HPV, with 26% of HPV-positive participants having more than one HPV infection. Moreover, the most common HPV genotypes detected were different than those routinely found in the United States.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates a deployable protocol for HPV screening in low- and middle-income countries with limited resources to perform cytopathology assessment of Pap smears.

Common Sexually Transmitted Infections in Women

The spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remains a significant public health issue in the United States. Social, economic, and behavioral implications affecting the spread of STIs have been identified. The most important social factor in the United States is the stigma associated with discussing sex and STI screening. In this article, specific recommendations for women are included regarding screening, diagnosing, and treating common vaginal and cervical infections. Screening women for infections of the vagina and cervix is essential because untreated infections may result in complications that have current and long-term health consequences and impact quality of life.

Anticipating the Impact of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination on US Cervical Cancer Prevention Strategies

Cervical cancer prevention guidelines are benchmarked to risk of cervical precancer. In younger age cohorts, vaccination against high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) has reduced HPV 16/18 prevalence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lower prevalence of precancer will impair the sensitivity of cytology and colposcopy, but negative predictive value will rise. Training and skills maintenance will become more difficult as abnormalities become less common. Primary screening with HPV assays will become more attractive but will require HPV genotyping as most positive HPV tests will reflect non-16/18 infections with lower oncogenicity. Screening will begin later and will occur at longer intervals. Colposcopy and treatment thresholds will become more stringent. Historical data sets will become inappropriate for guidelines development. As women immunized using nonavalent vaccine reach screening age, these trends will become still more pronounced.

A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology

The critical nature of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician/advanced practice provider and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the healthcare team. This document, developed by experts in laboratory and adult and pediatric clinical medicine, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. This document presents a system-based approach rather than specimen-based approach, and includes bloodstream and cardiovascular system infections, central nervous system infections, ocular infections, soft tissue infections of the head and neck, upper and lower respiratory infections, infections of the gastrointestinal tract, intra-abdominal infections, bone and joint infections, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and other skin and soft tissue infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including arthropod-borne infections, viral syndromes, and blood and tissue parasite infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. In addition, the pediatric needs of specimen management are also emphasized. There is intentional redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a guidance for physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to quickly and accurately diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.

Cervical cancer in Iran: integrative insights of epidemiological analysis

Background: Cervical cancer is a common cancer among women around the world. Due to the geographical differences in incidence, mortality and risk factors of cervical cancer, it is necessary to conduct different studies in different countries. This review study is aimed to investigate the most important aspects of cervical cancer in Iran.

Methods: Reviewing papers without time limitation was conducted with the keywords cervical cancer, Cervix uteri cancer and Iran in their title or abstract. The databases of Medline, IranMedex, SID, ScienceDirect, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. The title and abstract of the papers were reviewed, in all, 51 full papers were reviewed.

Results: Based on published studies, the incidence of cervical cancer varies between different areas of Iran. The findings of this study demonstrated that there is a relationship between marital status, marriage age, and age of first pregnancy, smoking, and consumption of oral contraceptive pills, multiple sexual partners, family history, multiparty, and cervical cancer.

Conclusion: The results of this review showed that the incidence of cervical cancer in Iran is low; however, the risk factors associated with this cancer are not few, which could lead to the increase in the incidence of cervical cancer in the future.

Risk of human papillomavirus infection in women with rheumatic disease: cervical cancer screening and prevention

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the USA, with over 14 million people acquiring HPV each year. HPV is also the cause of most anogenital cancers. About 90% of HPV infections spontaneously resolve over 3 years. However, about 10% remain as persistent infection defined as repeatedly detected in cervical samples. As HPV is controlled by local and systemic immune responses, individuals with immunosuppression are at risk for cervical cancer. It is hypothesized that immunosuppressed individuals are more likely to have HPV persistence, which is necessary for malignant transformation. Accordingly, women with rheumatic diseases such as SLE and RA are likely vulnerable to HPV infection and the progression of cervical disease. The HPV vaccine, given as a series of vaccinations, is safe and effective that can prevent HPV infection and cervical cancer. There is no contraindication to HPV vaccination for women to age 26 with rheumatic disease, as it is not live. As in the general population, timing is key for the efficacy of the HPV vaccine as the goal is to vaccinate prior to sexual debut and exposure to HPV. There are no formal recommendations for cervical cancer screening in women with rheumatic disease but recommendations for the HIV-positive population can be adopted, meaning to screen with a Pap test annually for three consecutive years and if all normal, to extend the interval to every 3 years with the option of co-testing with HPV at 30 years and older.

Strategies for screening and early detection of anal cancers: A narrative and systematic review and meta-analysis of cytology, HPV testing, and other biomarkers

Anal cancer incidence and mortality have been increasing over the past decade. Although the incidence in the general population remains low, it is much higher in certain subgroups, including those living with human immunodeficiency virus and men who have sex with men. Approximately 90% of anal squamous cell cancers are caused by infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Given the common etiology between anal and cervical carcinogenesis, screening for anal cancer has been proposed in certain high-risk populations using strategies adapted from cervical cancer prevention. In this review, the authors discuss important differences in anal and cervical cancer regarding the populations at risk, disease natural history, and clinical procedures and outcomes that need to be considered when evaluating strategies for anal cancer screening. They also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of anal cytology, anal HPV testing, and various biomarkers for the detection of anal precancers and cancers. The implications of these performance estimates are summarized in the context of risk-based screening and management of anal precancers, and important research gaps are highlighted that need to be addressed to fully understand the benefits and harms of anal cancer screening. Cancer Cytopathol 2018. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium

Timely follow-up for positive cancer screening results remains suboptimal, and the evidence base to inform decisions on optimizing the timeliness of diagnostic testing is unclear. This systematic review evaluated published studies regarding time to follow-up after a positive screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. The quality of available evidence was very low or low across cancers, with potential attenuated or reversed associations from confounding by indication in most studies. Overall, evidence suggested that the risk for poorer cancer outcomes rises with longer wait times that vary within and across cancer types, which supports performing diagnostic testing as soon as feasible after the positive result, but evidence for specific time targets is limited. Within these limitations, we provide our opinion on cancer-specific recommendations for times to follow-up and how existing guidelines relate to the current evidence. Thresholds set should consider patient worry, potential for loss to follow-up with prolonged wait times, and available resources. Research is needed to better guide the timeliness of diagnostic follow-up, including considerations for patient preferences and existing barriers, while addressing methodological weaknesses. Research is also needed to identify effective interventions for reducing wait times for diagnostic testing, particularly in underserved or low-resource settings. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:199-216. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Increased Rate of ASCUS Diagnosis With Concomitant Request for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Reflex Testing May Be Due to Cognitive Bias

OBJECTIVES

To determine if concomitant high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV-HR) reflex testing may bias the cytologic interpretation of Papanicolaou (Pap) tests.

METHODS

Percentage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and HPV-HR positivity was compared between Pap tests with HPV-HR cotesting and HPV-HR reflex testing for ASCUS, with subset analysis of cytopathologists' experience.

RESULTS

ASCUS in the reflex group (41.5%) was significantly higher than the cotesting group (33.0%) (P = .02). There was no difference in HPV-HR positivity or ASCUS/squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) ratios between the two groups. The cytopathologists' experience inversely correlated with the proportion of ASCUS but did not explain the higher reflex group ASCUS.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-HR reflex testing may introduce bias in cytologic diagnosis, making it more likely that an ASCUS diagnosis is rendered. HPV-HR and ASCUS/SIL ratios were similar between the groups, so cytopathologist performance was not significantly affected. There was no effect of cytopathologists' experience.

Human Papillomavirus DNA Methylation as a Biomarker for Cervical Precancer: Consistency across 12 Genotypes and Potential Impact on Management of HPV-Positive Women

Purpose: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA methylation testing is a promising triage option for women testing HPV positive during cervical cancer screening. However, the extent to which methylation indicates precancer for all 12 carcinogenic HPV types has not been evaluated.Experimental Design: In this nested case-control study, we tested up to 30 cases of precancer [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3)/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)] and 30 normal controls for each carcinogenic type (single infections with 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59). Next-generation bisulfite sequencing was performed on CpG sites within the L1 and L2 genes. We calculated differences in methylation, ORs, and AUC. Using a fixed sensitivity of 80%, we evaluated the specificity and the risk of CIN3/AIS for best performing CpG sites, and compared the performance of an explorative multi-type methylation assay with current triage strategies.Results: Methylation was positively associated with CIN3/AIS across all 12 types. AUCs for the top sites ranged from 0.71 (HPV51 and HPV56) to 0.86 (HPV18). A combined 12-type methylation assay had the highest Youden index (0.46), compared with cytology (0.31) and a 5-type methylation assay, including only previously described types (0.26). The 12-type methylation assay had higher sensitivity (80% vs. 76.6%) and lower test positivity compared with cytology (38.5% vs. 48.7%). The risk of CIN3/AIS was highest for methylation positives and lowest for cytology or HPV16/18 positives.Conclusions: HPV DNA methylation is a general phenomenon marking the transition from HPV infection to precancer for all 12 carcinogenic types. Development of a combined multitype methylation assay may serve as a triage test for HPV-positive women. Clin Cancer Res; 24(9); 2194-202. ©2018 AACR.

High-risk HPV genotype distribution in HPV co-test specimens: study of a predominantly Midwestern population

INTRODUCTION

High-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genoprevalence was assessed in cytologic specimens co-tested for HR-HPV in a predominantly Midwestern U.S. population, of which there are limited current data. These baseline data will aid in determining future shifts in HR-HPV genoprevalence.

METHODS

A total of 40,739 cervical/endocervical samples collected in PreservCyt (ThinPrep) media at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, underwent HR-HPV co-testing between January 2014 and December 2016 in women aged 30-98 years. This included 37,656 negative for intraepithelial lesion (NIL), 1696 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), 159 atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), 911 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 188 high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and 129 atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) cases. Roche cobas 4800 classified HR-HPV genotypes as 16, 18, or "other" (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68).

RESULTS

Of 40,739 co-tested specimens, 3786 were positive for at least one HR-HPV strain. "Other" only genotypes were most prevalent (74.3% of all HR-HPV cases). HPV16 and/or HPV18 were more common in the more significant diagnoses and were present in 59.1% of HSIL. HPV16-only was second most prevalent, with highest prevalence in HSIL (33.3%) and ASC-H (20.6%). HPV16 combined with "other" was third most prevalent, except in AGUS. HR-HPV (all genotypes) was most prevalent in those aged 30-39 years, decreasing with age (P < 0.0001). There was a trend toward HPV16 prevalence increasing with age (P = 0.4244).

CONCLUSIONS

HR-HPV "other" combination was most prevalent in all diagnoses except HSIL, in which HPV16 and/or HPV18 (exclusive of "other" genotypes) were most prevalent.

Cervical Cancer Screening

Cervical cancer screening in the United States has accompanied profound decreases in cancer incidence and mortality over the last half century. Two screening strategies are currently endorsed by US-based guideline groups: (1) triennial cytology for women aged 21 to 65 years, and (2) triennial cytology for women aged 21 to 29 years followed by cytology plus testing for high-risk human papillomavirus types every 5 years for women aged 30 years and older. Providing women with affordable, easily accessible screening, follow-up of abnormal tests, and timely treatment will result in the greatest impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality.

A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women

Cytology‐based cervical cancer screening is restricted because of a lack of cytologists. Thus, HPV‐based instead of cytology‐based screening may be a more suitable strategy in China. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HPV testing (Cobas^® 4800 Test, Roche) and HPV‐based programs to detect high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cancer compared with cytology (Thinprep, Hologic) and cytology‐based programs through a cross‐sectional study in 11,064 Chinese women aged 21–65 years who were enrolled from Longyou County in Zhejiang Province, China. The rates of HPV positivity and cytology abnormality were 9.8% and 6.1%, respectively. The HPV positivity rate had two age peaks, 21–24 (15.4%) and 60–65 (14.4%) years. According to adjusted data, HPV testing demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) than cytology for detecting CIN2 or worse (90.0% vs. 66.7%, 99.9% vs. 99.5%), and there was an acceptable specificity (91.3%) and positive predictive value (PPV, 12.5%). Furthermore, primary HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping showed the highest sensitivity (78.6%) and NPV (99.7%) among four screening strategies, and there was similar specificity (96.8%) and PPV (23.9%) compared with co‐testing screening to detect CIN2+, while there were fewer colposcopies (4.2) and tests (106.3) performed than with co‐testing and primary cytology screening to detect a case of high‐grade CIN. The differences in effectiveness were approximately similar when CIN3+ was the identifying target. Our findings suggest that primary HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping has a higher sensitivity and NPV, possesses optimal cost/effectiveness in the first round of screening and is a feasible strategy of cervical cancer screening for Chinese women.

The significance of parakeratosis alone in cervicovaginal cytology of turkish women

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyze the significance of parakeratosis on an otherwise negative Papanicalaou (Pap) smear, in the absence of any characteristic human papilloma virus (HPV) findings.

METHODS

A total of 22,076 Papanicalaou smears that were diagnosed as negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy between 2013 and 2015 were included in this study. Samples were separated into two groups, according to the presence of parakeratosis. We investigated the association between parakeratosis in the cytology results and a high-risk HPV status and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in the colposcopic biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

A positive HPV result was more frequently identified in cases with parakeratosis than in cases without parakeratosis (P < 0.001). A histological diagnosis of HSIL was more frequently observed in HPV-positive cases with a diagnosis of parakeratosis on cytology than in cases without parakeratosis (P = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that a finding of parakeratosis on an otherwise negative Pap smear supports a follow-up HPV DNA test. Also we should consider whether the presence of parakeratosis should be included in standard cytology reports. Additionally parakeratosis trended toward increased frequency of HSIL in follow-up biopsy specimens. But it did not reach statistical significance. That is why larger studies are necessary to evaluate the association of parakeratosis and HSIL in colposcopic biopsy specimens. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:297-302. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.