Role of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in the Etiological Work-Up of Congenitally Deaf Children

Current phenotypic and genetic spectrum of syndromic deafness in Tunisia: paving the way for precision auditory health

Hearing impairment (HI) is a prevalent neurosensory condition globally, impacting 5% of the population, with over 50% of congenital cases attributed to genetic etiologies. In Tunisia, HI underdiagnosis prevails, primarily due to limited access to comprehensive clinical tools, particularly for syndromic deafness (SD), characterized by clinical and genetic heterogeneity. This study aimed to uncover the SD spectrum through a 14-year investigation of a Tunisian cohort encompassing over 700 patients from four referral centers (2007-2021). Employing Sanger sequencing, Targeted Panel Gene Sequencing, and Whole Exome Sequencing, genetic analysis in 30 SD patients identified diagnoses such as Usher syndrome, Waardenburg syndrome, cranio-facial-hand-deafness syndrome, and H syndrome. This latter is a rare genodermatosis characterized by HI, hyperpigmentation, hypertrichosis, and systemic manifestations. A meta-analysis integrating our findings with existing data revealed that nearly 50% of Tunisian SD cases corresponded to rare inherited metabolic disorders. Distinguishing between non-syndromic and syndromic HI poses a challenge, where the age of onset and progression of features significantly impact accurate diagnoses. Despite advancements in local genetic characterization capabilities, certain ultra-rare forms of SD remain underdiagnosed. This research contributes critical insights to inform molecular diagnosis approaches for SD in Tunisia and the broader North-African region, thereby facilitating informed decision-making in clinical practice.

Identification of a novel compound heterozygous pathogenic variant in MYO7A causing Usher syndrome type IB in a Chinese patient: a case report

Herein, we report the clinical and genetic features of a patient with Usher syndrome type IB to improve our collective understanding of the disorder. The patient was a teenaged boy with congenital profound hearing loss, progressive visual loss, and vestibular hypoplasia; his parents were phenotypically normal. His pure tone audiometry hearing thresholds were 100 dB at all frequencies, and distortion product otoacoustic emission was not elicited at any frequencies in either ear. Moreover, an auditory brainstem response test at 100 dB normal hearing level revealed no relevant response waves, and a caloric test showed vestibular hypoplasia. Fundus examination revealed retinitis pigmentosa and a reduced visual field. The use of high-throughput sequencing technology to screen the patient's family lineage for deafness-related genes revealed that the patient carried a compound heterozygous pathogenic variant of MYO7A: c.541C > T and c.6364delG. This pathogenic variant has not previously been reported. Our findings may provide a basis for genetic counseling, effective treatment, and/or gene therapy for Usher syndrome.

Analysis of congenital hearing loss after neonatal hearing screening

Introduction

Neonates undergo neonatal hearing screening to detect congenital hearing loss at an early stage. Once confirmed, it is necessary to perform an etiological workup to start appropriate treatment. The study objective was to assess the different etiologies, risk factors, and hearing results of infants with permanent hearing loss and to evaluate the efficacy and consequences of the different screening devices over the last 21 years.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort analysis for all neonatal hearing screening program referrals and performed an etiological workup in case of confirmed hearing loss. We analyzed the evolution of the etiological protocols based on these results.

Results

The governmental neonatal hearing screening program referred 545 infants to our center. Hearing loss was confirmed in 362 (66.4%) infants and an audiological workup was performed in 458 (84%) cases. 133 (24.4%) infants were diagnosed with permanent hearing loss. Ninety infants (56 bilateral and 34 unilateral) had sensorineural hearing loss, and the degree was predominantly moderate or profound. The most common etiology in bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was a genetic etiology (32.1%), and in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, an anatomical abnormality (26.5%). Familial history of hearing loss was the most frequently encountered risk factor.

Conclusion

There is a significant number of false positives after the neonatal hearing screening. Permanent hearing loss is found only in a limited number of infants. During the 21 years of this study, we noticed an increase in etiological diagnoses, especially genetic causes, due to more advanced techniques. Genetic causes and anatomical abnormalities are the most common etiology of bilateral and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, respectively, but a portion remains unknown after extensive examinations.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Children With Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Diagnostic Yield and Predictors of a Genetic Cause

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic yield of targeted next-generation sequencing using hearing loss panels and to identify patient-related factors that are associated with a definite genetic cause.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Children with congenital or late-onset, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of patients with a definite genetic diagnosis.

RESULTS

We report on 238 patients with hearing loss: 130 were male and 108 were female. About 55% had congenital hearing loss. A genetic cause was identified in 94 of the patients (39.5%), with 72.3% of these showing nonsyndromic and 27.6% showing syndromic hearing loss. The diagnostic yield was highest among North African patients (66.7%). A multiple linear regression model shows that profound hearing loss, family history of hearing loss, congenital hearing loss, and North African ethnicity are significantly related to identifying a genetic cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted next-generation sequencing using a panel of hearing loss genes identified a genetic diagnosis in almost 40% of children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. We describe the predictors of a genetic diagnosis, and this information may be used during genetic counseling.

Addition of an affected family member to a previously ascertained autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss pedigree and systematic phenotype-genotype analysis of splice-site variants in MYO15A

Pathogenic variants in MYO15A are known to cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL), DFNB3. We have previously reported on one ARNSHL family including two affected siblings and identified MYO15A c.5964+3G > A and c.8375 T > C (p.Val2792Ala) as the possible deafness-causing variants. Eight year follow up identified one new affected individual in this family, who also showed congenital, severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. By whole exome sequencing, we identified a new splice-site variant c.5531+1G > C (maternal allele), in a compound heterozygote with previously identified missense variant c.8375 T > C (p.Val2792Ala) (paternal allele) in MYO15A as the disease-causing variants. The new affected individual underwent unilateral cochlear implantation at the age of 1 year, and 5 year follow-up showed satisfactory speech and language outcomes. Our results further indicate that MYO15A-associated hearing loss is good candidates for cochlear implantation, which is in accordance with previous report. In light of our findings and review of the literatures, 58 splice-site variants in MYO15A are correlated with a severe deafness phenotype, composed of 46 canonical splice-site variants and 12 non-canonical splice-site variants.

Extended genetic diagnostics for children with profound sensorineural hearing loss by implementing massive parallel sequencing. Diagnostic outcome, family experience and clinical implementation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate genetic outcomes, analyze the family experience, and describe the process of implementing genetic sequencing for children with profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) at a tertial audiological center in southern Sweden.

DESIGN

This is a prospective pilot study including eleven children with profound bilateral SNHL who underwent cochlear implant surgery. Genetic diagnostic investigation was performed with whole exome sequencing (WES) complemented with XON-array to identify copy number variants, using a manually curated gene panel incorporating 179 genes associated with non-syndromic and syndromic SNHL. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from blood was examined separately. A patient reported experience measures (PREM) questionnaire was used to evaluate parental experience. We also describe here the process of implementing WES in an audiology department.

RESULTS

Six female and five male children (mean 3.4 years, SD 3.5 years), with profound bilateral SNHL were included. Genetic variants of interest were found in six subjects (55%), where three (27%) could be classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Among the six cases, one child was found to have a homozygous pathogenic variant in MYO7A and two children had homozygous likely pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 and PCDH15, respectively. One was carrying a compound heterozygote frameshift variant of uncertain significance (VUS) on one allele and in trans, a likely pathogenic deletion on the other allele in PCDH15. Two subjects had homozygous VUS in PCDH15 and ADGRV1, respectively. In five of the cases the variants were in genes associated with Usher syndrome. For one of the likely pathogenic variants, the finding was related to Pendred syndrome. No mtDNA variants related to SNHL were found. The PREM questionnaire revealed that the families had difficulty in fully understanding the results of the genetic analysis. However, the parents of all eleven (100%) subjects still recommended that other families with children with SNHL should undergo genetic testing. Specifically addressed referrals for prompt complementary clinical examination and more individualized care were possible, based on the genetic results. Close clinical collaboration between different specialists, including physicians of audiology, audiologists, clinical geneticists, ophthalmologists, pediatricians, otoneurologists, physiotherapists and hearing habilitation teams was initiated during the implementation of the new regime. For all professionals involved, a better knowledge of the diversity of the genetic background of hearing loss was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole exome sequencing and XON-array using a panel of genes associated with SNHL had a high diagnostic yield, added value to the families, and provided guidance for further examinations and habilitation for the child. Great care should be taken to thoroughly inform parents about the genetic test result. Collaborations between departments were intensified and knowledge of hearing genomics was increased among the staff.

Genetics of Childhood Hearing Loss

Compelling evidence indicates that some newborns harboring genetic variants associated with hearing loss might not be identified by current physiologic newborn hearing screening (NBHS) rendering current NBHS protocols suboptimal. Incorporating genomic sequencing into NBHS would improve clinical diagnosis and decrease time to early intervention efforts.

Usher Syndrome in the Inner Ear: Etiologies and Advances in Gene Therapy

Hearing loss is the most common sensory disorder with ~466 million people worldwide affected, representing about 5% of the population. A substantial portion of hearing loss is genetic. Hearing loss can either be non-syndromic, if hearing loss is the only clinical manifestation, or syndromic, if the hearing loss is accompanied by a collage of other clinical manifestations. Usher syndrome is a syndromic form of genetic hearing loss that is accompanied by impaired vision associated with retinitis pigmentosa and, in many cases, vestibular dysfunction. It is the most common cause of deaf-blindness. Currently cochlear implantation or hearing aids are the only treatments for Usher-related hearing loss. However, gene therapy has shown promise in treating Usher-related retinitis pigmentosa. Here we review how the etiologies of Usher-related hearing loss make it a good candidate for gene therapy and discuss how various forms of gene therapy could be applied to Usher-related hearing loss.

Screening Strategies for Deafness Genes and Functional Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Patients

OBJECTIVES

To review the current state of knowledge about the influence of specific genetic mutations that cause sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on cochlear implant (CI) functional outcomes, and how this knowledge may be integrated into clinical practice. A multistep and sequential population-based genetic algorithm suitable for the identification of congenital SNHL mutations before CI placement is also examined.

DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION

A review was performed of the English literature from 2000 to 2019 using PubMed regarding the influence of specific mutations on CI outcomes and the use of next-generation sequencing for genetic screening of CI patients.

CONCLUSION

CI is an effective habilitation option for patients with severe-profound congenital SNHL. However, it is well known that CI outcomes show substantial inter-patient variation. Recent advances in genetic studies have improved our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships for many of the mutations underlying congenital SNHL, and have explored how these relationships may account for some of the variance seen in CI performance outcomes. A sequential genetic screening strategy utilizing next-generation sequencing-based population-specific gene panels may allow for more efficient mutation identification before CI placement. Understanding the relationships between specific mutations and CI outcomes along with integrating routine comprehensive genetic testing into pre-CI evaluations will allow for more effective patient counseling and open the door for the development of mutation-specific treatment strategies.

[Molecular and functional testing in case of hereditary hearing loss associated with the SLC26A4 gene]

Due to development of molecular techniques at hand, the number of genomic sequence variants detected in patient investigations is rising constantly. The number of potentially involved genes in hereditary hearing loss is rising simultaneously.In this overview, current methods for diagnostic workup on a molecular and functional level for variants of the SLC26A4 gene are described. Based on the description of the physiological function of the resulting protein Pendrin, molecular investigations for interpretation of the function are explained. Based on these investigations, the potential clinical consequences of a variant may be predicted more precisely and simplify routine reporting of a proven genotype and a phenotype, at hand. Finally, subsequent clinical investigations necessary, such as perchlorate discharge test, as well as therapeutic options are discussed.

Etiological Work-up in Referrals From Neonatal Hearing Screening: 20 Years of Experience

BACKGROUND

Confirmation of permanent hearing loss in a newborn should be followed by a search for an underlying etiology because this may impact hearing loss management and counselling.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all newborns seen at a tertiary referral center after referral from newborn hearing screening over a 20-year period. The changes in the diagnostic protocol over the years are outlined and the most recent protocol includes targeted next-generation sequencing using a panel for known hearing loss causing genes, in all cases of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

RESULTS

Permanent hearing loss was confirmed in 235 of 1,002 neonates. A complete etiological work-up was performed in 138 cases of SNHL (77 bilateral and 61 unilateral), with the underlying cause found in 77.9% and in 67.2% of patients respectively. Genetic causes explained 55 (58.4%) of bilateral cases and in 17 a genetic cause was identified by the gene panel. Pathogenic variants in GJB2 and MYO15A explained most cases of nonsyndromic SNHL. Waardenburg syndrome was the most frequent syndromic cause. Cochlear nerve deficiency and congenital cytomegalovirus infection accounted for the majority of unilateral SNHL.Other causes of congenital hearing loss were conductive hearing loss (n = 12) and auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of targeted next-generation sequencing in the etiological work-up improves the diagnostic yield in congenital SNHL, leaving only about 20% of bilateral and 30% of unilateral cases unsolved.