Risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss in diabetic patients: a population-based cohort study. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:1482-1488. [PMID: 23064384 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318271397a]

A Systematic Review on Heritability of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence supporting the heritability and genetic basis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

DATA SOURCE

Records were extracted from PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases.

REVIEW METHODS

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022357389) and includes a systematic review on the genetic contribution to SSNHL. The search strategy yielded 1.483 articles from electronic databases. After quality assessment, 34 records were selected, including 369.650 patients with SSNHL from nine prevalence studies, two familial aggregation studies, one twin study, and 22 genetic studies. The prevalence of SSNHL was calculated from data on its incidence from population-based studies (period prevalence). To evaluate the heritability of SSNHL, the sibling recurrence risk ratio (λs) was calculated, by comparing the prevalence of SSNHL among siblings within the same generation to the estimated prevalence in the overall population. Genetic variants were grouped, based on the pathological mechanism related to SSNHL.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SSNHL ranged from 0.1% to 0.0003% in America to 0.12%-0.0093% in Asia. The estimated sibling recurrence risk ratio for SSNHL (λs = 20.8-83.3) supports a significant familial aggregation. Although several genetic variants were reported to be associated with SSHL in controlled studies, neither was replicated in an independent cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supporting heritability of SSNHL is limited to epidemiological studies showing prevalence differences across different populations and familial aggregation. Genetic studies are of low quality and they lack replication cohort to confirm their findings. According to its low prevalence, exome or genome sequencing familial-based studies are needed to identify rare genetic variants in SSNHL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:3447-3457, 2024.

The Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on the Incidence, Severity, and Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSHL): A Systematic Review

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is believed to be mainly idiopathic since the cause is not usually identified. Several recent studies have examined the role of cardiovascular risk factors in this disease. The aim of this systematic literature review is to investigate the possible association between acquired and inherited cardiovascular risk factors and the incidence, severity, and prognosis of SSHL. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of the PubMed database for the period between February 2010 and January 2023 was performed in order to retrieve eligible articles. The analytic cohort included 24 studies. Overall, this systematic review includes a total of 61,060 patients that were encompassed in these studies. According to most studies, the prevalence of dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and ultrasound indices of atherosclerosis was significantly higher in SSHL patients compared to controls. On the other hand, obesity, hypertension, and smoking did not seem to influence the risk of SSHL. Most studies suggest the presence of a correlation between a high cardiovascular risk profile and the risk of developing SSHL. The theory of microvascular impairment in the development of SSHL is indirectly supported by the findings of this review.

The construction and validation of prognostic prediction model for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in middle-aged and elderly people

OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), as an otologic emergency, is commonly encountered and its prevalence has been climbing every year recently. To our knowledge, the prognosis of middle-aged and elderly patients is worse than that of young patients. Previous researches mainly focused on the adult population, which was considered as prognostic models who performed hearing recovery in ISSNHL. However, few studies regarding the middle-aged and elderly population who are regarded as prognostic models have been reported. Therefore, we aim to construct and validate a nomogram-based prognostic prediction model, which can provide a reference for the prognostic assessment in the middle-aged and elderly patients with ISSNHL.

METHOD

A total of 371 middle-aged and elderly ISSNHL patients who were admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yanbian Hospital, Yanbian University, from April 2018 to April 2023 were enrolled in the study. All subjects were randomly divided into two groups including training group (n = 263) and validation group (n = 108). Lasso regression and multi-factor logistic regression were jointly utilized to screen out prognosis-related independent risk factors and establish a nomogram-based risk prediction model. The accuracy and clinical application value of the model were evaluated by combining the Bootstrapping method and k-fold cross-validation, plotting the receiver operating characteristic  (ROC)  curve, calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC), plotting the decision curve analysis (DCA), and the calibrating curve.

RESULT

We used the method of lasso regression combined with multivariate logistic regression and finally screened out eight predictors (including age, number of affected ears, degree of hearing loss, type of hearing curve, duration of disease, presence of vertigo, diabetes, and lacunar cerebral infarction) that were included into the nomogram. The C-index were 0.823 [95% CI (0.725, 0.921)] and 0.851 [95% CI (0.701, 1.000)], and the AUC values were 0.812 and 0.823 for the training and validation groups, respectively. The calibration curve for the validation group was approximately conformed to that for the modeling group, indicating favorable model calibration. The DCA results revealed the modeling group (3%-86%) and the validation group (2%-92%) showed significant net clinical benefit under the majority of thresholds.

CONCLUSION

This study developed and validated a nomogram-based prognostic prediction model which based on the eight independent risk factors mentioned above. The predictors are conveniently accessible and may assist clinicians in formulating individualized treatment strategies.

A Nationwide Population-Based Study for the Recurrence and Comorbidities in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate the cumulative recurrence rate of SSNHL and to determine association between comorbidities and recurrence of SSNHL by comparing patients with and without recurrence.

METHODS

Using the National Health Insurance Claims Database (NHICD) from 2009 to 2020, we conducted a population-based study. We only enrolled patients whose records showed a prescription for steroid and audiometry findings as well as an appropriate diagnostic code. Recurrence of SSNHL was defined as an episode of SSNHL greater than or equal to 3 months after the first episode of SSNHL. We compared the recurrence rate of SSNHL according to age and number of SSNHL recurrences. We also explored comorbidities including autoimmune, metabolic, chronic renal diseases, cancer, and migraine associated with recurrent SSNHL.

RESULTS

A total of 257,123 patients were identified. We found that 6.7% (17,270/257,123) of the patients had at least one recurrence of SSNHL. The recurrence rate increases with the number of recurrences and over time. The incidence per 100,000 people tended to increase with age, and the recurrence rate appeared to decrease with age. We found an increase in the incidence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and a decrease in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), myocardial infarction (MI), and hemorrhagic stroke in patients with recurrence.

CONCLUSION

For patients with recurrence or AS, considerable efforts should be made to prevent recurrence. As SSNHL is an emergent otologic condition, when symptoms occur, they should receive immediate treatment. Additional well-designed population-based studies are required to generalize our results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1417-1425, 2024.

The therapeutic effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with severe to profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

The optimal treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is unclear. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested as a viable option for treatment of SSNHL as it improves vascular dysfunction. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of HBOT by retrospectively reviewing the records of 2206 patients with SSNHL. 54 who had received HBOT were selected for the HBOT groups, while 59 age-matched controls who had not were selected for the control groups. The HBOT and control groups were divided into subgroups according to intratympanic steroid (ITS) use. Groups A-D had received oral steroids + HBOT, oral steroids only, oral steroids + ITS + HBOT, and oral steroids + ITS, respectively. Of the 113 SSNHL patients, 21 had diabetes mellitus (DM) (2, 0, 9, and 10 patients in Groups A-D, respectively). There was no notable difference in hearing improvement between patients receiving HBOT and those in the control group. However, among diabetic patients, those who underwent HBOT demonstrated a significant improvement in hearing when compared to the control group. The combination of HBOT and steroids could potentially be beneficial for treating severe to profound SSNHL patients with DM.

Recovery From Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Association With Cardiovascular Disease Risk

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) disease severity and recovery.

METHOD

A retrospective medical chart review was performed on 90 patients (n = 48 men; Mage = 59.8 years, SD = 15.8) evaluated for ISSNHL. Major CVD risk factors (current tobacco smoking, diabetes, total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dl or treatment, and hypertension [systolic blood pressure [BP]/diastolic BP ≥ 140/ ≥ 90 mmHg or treatment]) determined two CVD risk groups: lower (no major risk factors) and higher (one or more risk factors). Two pure-tone averages (PTAs) were computed: PTA0.5,1,2 and PTA3,4,6,8. Complete recovery of ISSNHL was defined as PTAinitial - PTAfollow-up ≥ 10 dB. Logistic regression estimated the odds of ISSNHL recovery by CVD risk status adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, noise exposure, and treatment.

RESULTS

Most patients (67.8%) had one or more CVD risk factors. Severity of initial low- and high-frequency hearing loss was similar between CVD risk groups. Recovery was 53.2% for PTA0.5,1,2 and 32.9% for PTA3,4,6,8. With multivariable adjustment, current/former smoking was associated with lower odds of PTA0.5,1,2 recovery (OR = 0.27; 95% CI [0.08, 0.92]). Neither higher CVD risk status nor individual CVD risk factors had a significant association with recovery. For every one-unit increase in Framingham Risk Score, odds of PTA3,4,6,8 recovery were 0.95 times lower (95% CI [0.90, 1.00]) after accounting for age, sex, body mass index, noise exposure, and treatment/time-to-treatment grouping (p = .056).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of low-frequency ISSNHL recovery is worse among current/former smokers than nonsmokers. Other CVD risk factors and aggregate risk are not significantly related to recovery.

Diabetes mellitus and hearing loss

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major disease threatening human health and its incidence is increasing year on year. As a chronic complication of DM, hearing loss mostly occurs undetectably. However, the mechanism of this diabetes-related hearing loss (DRHL) remains unclear and there is no effective clinical treatment. Studies of animal or human pathology show that DM causes damage to the blood vessels, spiral ganglion neurons, afferent nerve fibers, the organ of Corti, and the stria vascularis of the inner ear. In recent years, more advances in pathological research have revealed the possible mechanism of DRHL. In addition, a large number of clinical studies suggest that the duration and severity of DM are closely related to the incidence and severity of DRHL. This review focuses on the relationship between DM and hearing loss. The clinical audiological characteristics of diabetic patients, risk factors for DRHL, typical pathology, and potential interventions of DRHL are summarized. This will help reveal the pathogenesis and intervention approaches for DRHL.

A Correlational Study of Hearing Loss and Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Jordanian Patients

Background Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is a common complication of diabetes, but the underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. This study investigated the relationship between several potential risk factors and SNHL in 118 individuals previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). Methods We did a cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 118 patients with diabetes mellitus at multiple tertiary hospitals in the Jordanian Royal Medical Services (JRMS). The mean age was 60.57 ± 12.8 years, with 56.8% males. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including age, gender, duration of diabetes, presence and duration of hypertension, diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity, tinnitus, and comprehension inability. In addition, a hearing assessment for SNHL was performed using pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz frequencies. Goodman and Kruskal's γ test and cumulative odds ordinal logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between these factors and hearing assessment results for SNHL. Results Goodman and Kruskal's γ test showed a statistically significant moderate and positive association between diabetic retinopathy severity and sensorineural hearing loss. Further analysis using logistic regression revealed that retinopathy severity, age, and gender were all significant predictors of hearing loss level in this population. The odds of having a higher level of hearing loss increased by 9.1% for each additional year of age and were higher for males than females. In terms of DR severity, a worsening SNHL had lower odds in individuals with no DR or mild nonproliferative DR compared to those with proliferative DR. Conclusion Our findings have important implications for managing SNHL in individuals with diabetes. They indicate that healthcare providers must closely monitor and manage the risk factors in patients with diabetes. Further research is needed to generalize better the relationship between these risk factors and SNHL, including the potential role of other factors, such as exposure to loud noise or certain medications.

The Role of Metabolic Syndrome Components in Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adolescents: A Case-Control Study

Introduction  Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its associated components were reported as a possible cause of inner ear dysfunction. However, research about the influence of cardiovascular risk factors on hearing thresholds are conducted mainly in adult patients. Objective  The aim of the present study was to investigate auditory function in adolescents with MetS compared with healthy controls. Methods  One hundred adolescents with metabolic syndrome and 200 sex- and age-matched controls were recruited from a university pediatric endocrine clinic from May 2018 to July 2020. Hearing loss was defined as hearing level ≥ 15 dB at speech frequency (SFHL) or high frequency (HFHL) in one or both ears. A multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis examined the correlation between MetS components and several important demographic characteristics, and hearing loss. Results  A total of 165 (55.0%) boys and 135 (45.0%) girls participated in this study. The rates of SFHL and HFHL in adolescents with MetS were 32.0% and 51.0%, respectively. Those values for controls were 5.0% and 15.5%, respectively. The regression analysis showed high triglycerides as a significant predictor for SFHL (odds ratio 10.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.98, 59.74). Neither predictor of interest was significant for HFHL. Conclusion  Hypertriglyceridemia may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of SFHL. However, the strength of the association was not significant with a wide confidence interval. Also, we were unable to find an association between predictors and HFHL with the current sample size. Larger and prospective studies are recommended.

Local vs Systemic Use of Steroids for Sudden Deafness with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with a risk of idiopathic sudden deafness. The main treatment of diabetic sudden deafness is systemic and topical application of steroids. Topical steroid therapy reduces systemic adverse reactions compared with systemic therapy.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis design on the improvement value and recovery rate of pure tone mean hearing threshold (PTA).To investigate whether there is difference between local and systemic steroid treatment as the initial treatment for sudden deafness patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We searched databases from publication date to October 1, 2022 including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, web of science, CNKI, Wan fang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and VIP information resource system. A systematic literature review was conducted on the efficacy and safety of local and systemic steroid therapy for diabetic sudden deafness. RevMan5.4 and stata14 software were used for Meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included in this study, covering 1777 patients, including 885 cases in the observation group (local steroid group) and 894 cases in the control group (systemic steroid group). Meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the total effective rate of local and systemic steroid treatment for diabetic sudden deafness between groups (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.11-1.22, P < 0.05). The effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. For the improvement of PTA, the difference between groups was statistically significant (RR = 6.60, 95% CI = 3.07-10.14, P < 0.05). The improvement of PTA in the local steroid group was higher than that in the systemic steroid group. Subgroup analysis showed that there were significant differences between groups in hormones, drug administration, follow-up time and course of disease.

CONCLUSION

Topical steroid therapy is effective in the treatment of diabetic sudden deafness. Hormone methylprednisolone has high effective rate; the shorter the course of disease and the longer the follow-up time are, the higher the total effective rate will be. Tympanic injection is more effective than post-aural injection. Topical steroid injections are safer for hormonal side effect.

The association between metabolic syndrome and the prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we investigated the association between metabolic syndrome and the prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 79 patients with idiopathic SSNHL admitted to the ENT ward were involved. Patients were under treatment with two-dose pulse methylprednisolone and then oral corticosteroid (Prednisolone 1 mg/kg for up to 2 weeks and more). In all patients, the mean hearing threshold was measured before treatment and 3 weeks after the treatment. Metabolic syndrome criteria were assessed in all patients too. Then, based on these diagnostic criteria all data in patients with and without metabolic were compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in Hypertension, BMI > 25, high TG and low HDL (p.v = 0.001) between two groups (metabolic syndrome group and non-metabolic syndrome group). The rate of recovered patients was significantly lower in the metabolic syndrome group than in the non-metabolic syndrome group (p.v = 0.001). It was found that metabolic syndrome (OR = 2.02), diabetes mellitus (OR = 7.32), HTN (OR = 4.09), BMI > 25 (OR = 3.24) and high initial hearing threshold (OR = 3.96) were clearly related to the poor prognosis of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the findings of this study, it was found that metabolic syndrome had a negative effect on hearing improvement in patients with idiopathic SSNHL.

Cardiovascular Risk and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

It was previously suggested that patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study is to determine if ISSNHL patients have an increased cardiovascular risk by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Libraries and Web of Science. Studies with a clear definition of ISSNHL, investigating an association between traditional vascular risk factors and ISSNHL were included. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, two reviewers extracted the data, assessed the risk of bias and performed the analysis of the collected evidence.

RESULTS

Nineteen case-control studies and two cohort studies were included (102,292 patients). Individual studies argued for higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus (DM) and higher blood pressure (HBP) in ISSNHL patients with a range of odds ratios (ORs) from 1.03 to 19. Pooled analysis of adjusted ORs revealed a significantly increased risk of ISSNHL for patients with hypertriglyceridemia (OR 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-2.02) and high levels of total cholesterol (TC) (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.52-2.87 after sensitivity analysis), but not for HBP, DM, or high levels of low- and high-density lipoproteins.

CONCLUSION

An association between higher vascular risk profile and ISSNHL seems apparent in high levels of triglycerides (TG) and TC, but more studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis due to the high levels of data heterogeneity in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 133:15-24, 2023.

Comorbidities and laboratory changes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a review

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is defined as an abrupt hearing loss of more than 30 dB in three contiguous frequencies within 72 h. It is an emergency disease requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment. The incidence of SSNHL in Western countries' population is estimated between 5 and 20 per 1,00,000 inhabitants. The etiology of SSNHL remains unknown. Due to the uncertainty of the cause of SSNHL, at present, no specific treatment targets the cause of SSNHL, resulting in poor efficacy. Previous studies have reported that some comorbidities are risk factors for SSNHL, and some laboratory results may provide some clues for the etiology of SSNHL. Atherosclerosis, microthrombosis, inflammation, and the immune system may be the main etiological factors for SSNHL. This study confirms that SSNHL is a multifactorial disease. Some comorbidities, such as virus infections, are suggested to be the causes of SSNHL. In summary, by analyzing the etiology of SSNHL, more targeting treatments should be used to achieve a better effect.

Cardiovascular risk factors among patients with acute unilateral inner ear hypofunction: A case-control study

Objectives

To assess the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and their impact on acute unilateral inner ear hypofunction (AUIEH), including acute unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy (AUPVP), sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and acute unilateral audiovestibular hypofunction (AUAVH).

Methods

One hundred and twenty-five patients consecutively diagnosed with AUPVP, SSNHL or AUAVH and 250 sex- and age-matched controls were included. Cases presented a mean age of 58.6 ± 14.7 years and included 59 women and 66 men. The correlation between CVRFs (high blood pressure [HBP], diabetes mellitus [DM], dyslipidemia [DLP], cardiocerebrovascular disease [CCVD]) and AUIEH was assessed by multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis.

Results

A higher prevalence of CVRFs was identified in patients than in controls (30 individuals with DM, 53 with HBP, 45 with DLP and 14 with a previous history of CCVD, p < .05). A significantly elevated risk of AUIEH was found in patients with two or more CVRFs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.11; 95% CI 2.23-11.70). Previous CCVD individually predicted AUIEH (OR 8.41; 95% CI 2.36-29.88). Subgroup analysis showed the same tendency for AUPVP and SSNHL.

Conclusion

Acute unilateral inner ear hypofunction patients presented significantly more CVRFs than controls, and the presence of two or more CVRFs was associated with AUIEH. Future studies evaluating vascular risk in AUIEH may include AUPVP and SSNHL patients from the same source population to better characterize risk profiles that can indicate a vascular origin.

Level of Evidence

3b.

Metformin Reduces the Incidence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Chart Review

Introduction and objectives

Acquired sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has become a critical societal issue in recent years. SNHL is considered a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Metformin is commonly used to treat T2DM. However, its effects on SNHL have not been reported yet. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the use of metformin and SNHL incidence.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective matched-cohort study, the medical records of 1219 patients with T2DM aged >18 years from our hospital’s inpatient database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019, were examined, and matched cohorts were generated (76 patients receiving metformin and 76 not receiving metformin). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors influencing the incidence of SNHL.

Results

After adjustment by propensity matching, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the non-use of metformin increased the risk of developing SNHL (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.93; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated an association between the use of metformin and a reduced incidence of SNHL among patients with T2DM.

Prognostic Factors Associated with Recovery from Recurrent Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Retrospective Analysis and Systematic Review

Although idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is uncommon, recurrent ISSNHL is even rarer. The knowledge about factors associated with patient recovery from recurrent episodes is needed to counsel and treat the patients. Medical records of patients admitted for high dose oral steroid therapy for recurrent ISSNHL between January 2009 and December 2021 were reviewed. Their demographic and clinical characteristics, co-morbid symptoms, and audiologic results were analyzed. The 38 patients admitted for treatment of recurrent ISSNHL included 14 men and 24 women. Recovery rates after the first and recurrent episodes of ISSNHL were 78.9% and 63.2%, respectively. Patients who recovered after recurrent episodes showed significantly higher rates of ear fullness symptoms and early treatment onset than those who did not recover (p < 0.05 each). Of the 30 patients who recovered after the first episode, those who had ear fullness symptoms (p < 0.05, odds ratio (OR) 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01−0.76) and who showed a lower initial hearing threshold (p < 0.05, OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01−1.12) during the recurrent episode showed significantly better or similar recovery than after the first episode. Ear fullness symptoms and less initial hearing loss were associated with a more favorable prognosis after intial than after recurrent ISSNHL.

Association of Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c Level With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Prospective Study

Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level has strong relevance to microvascular disorders, which are also thought to be the current main aspect of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), so we aim to elucidate the association of the HbA1c level with the severity, types, and prognosis of SSNHL. In this study, comparative analyses based on propensity score matching of the severity, types, and prognosis of SSNHL with the HbA1c level in 116 patients diagnosed as SSNHL were conducted, where they were divided into diabetes mellitus (DM) group and non-DM group. We finally found that, among patients with SSNHL, diabetic patients had a higher HbA1c level, more severe hearing loss, and poorer prognosis than non-diabetic patients. The HbA1c level was found to be significantly correlated with the severity and types of SSNHL, while no strong relevance was found between the higher HbA1c level and the poorer prognosis of SSNHL.

Association of Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case-Crossover, Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study

The etiology of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) has been unclear until now. Understanding its potential etiology is crucial for the development of preventive medicine. In this study, we investigated the association between acute upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) and SSNHL risk. We conducted a case-crossover study by using the longitudinal health insurance database derived from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Individual acute URI between the case and control periods was reviewed. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of SSNHL risk associated with acute URIs after adjustments for potential confounders. In total, 1131 patients with SSNHL between 2010 and 2013 fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included. The aOR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for SSNHL was 1.57 (1.20-2.05) in relation to acute URIs one month before the index date. Moreover, the aORs (95% CIs) of the female and young to middle-aged (≤65 years) populations were 1.63 (1.13-2.36) and 1.76 (1.29-2.40), respectively. In addition, the association between SSNHL and acute URIs was decreased over time. The aOR for SSNHL was 1.25 (1.01-1.56) in relation to acute URIs three months before the index date. Acute URIs increase SSNHL risk and are a potential risk factor for SSNHL. The establishment of a feasible health policy for the prevention of acute URIs is crucial for SSNHL prevention, particularly in female, and young to middle-aged populations.

Increased risk of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with spinal cord injury: a nationwide longitudinal follow-up study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with 10 years follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risks of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with and without spinal cord injury, based on a nationally representative sample.

SETTING

Taiwan's Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005.

METHOD

A total of 2006 participants who had been aged between 20 and 69 and who had spinal cord injury as of 2002-06 were enrolled in the spinal cord injury group. The non-spinal cord injury group consisted of 8024 sex- and age-matched, randomly sampled participants without spinal cord injury. Then, their sensorineural hearing loss -cumulative incidence curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Stratified Cox proportional-hazard regression was employed to estimate the effect of having spinal cord injury on patients' subsequent risk of sensorineural hearing loss.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 30 patients in the spinal cord injury group and 87 in the non-spinal cord injury group developed sensorineural hearing loss. As such, the cumulative incidence of sensorineural hearing loss was significantly higher in the spinal cord injury group than the non-spinal cord injury group (2.16 vs. 1.21 per 1000 person-years, p = 0.008). The adjusted hazard ratio of sensorineural hearing loss for the spinal cord injury group was 1.75 times that of the non-spinal cord injury group (95% CI, 1.14-2.68, p = 0.01). The patients with non-cervical SCI appeared to have a higher magnitude of SNHL risk than their cervical SCI counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that patients with spinal cord injury have an increased risk of developing sensorineural hearing loss.

Is the risk of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss higher in nasopharyngeal carcinoma than in hypopharyngeal cancer? A population-based study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer with that in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A population-based, retrospective cohort study was performed using the Taiwan National Health Research Database databank. Patients selected for this study were diagnosed with hypopharyngeal cancer or NPC and treated with radiotherapy in the period from 2001 to 2004. Routine follow-up was conducted for 8 years (2004-2012), and the incidence of SSHL was calculated at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the risk of developing SSHL between the hypopharyngeal cancer group and its control group (p = 1.000). In hypopharyngeal cancer and NPC groups, the rates of SSHL were 0.12% and 1.00%, respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative hazard of SSHL during the follow-up period was significantly higher in the NPC group than in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer did not increase the risk of developing SSHL, but postirradiation NPC was significantly associated with an increased incidence of SSHL.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: What factors influence the response to therapy?

The standard treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss is based on oral steroids. In addition, intratympanic steroid is currently used in patients who fail to respond to oral treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, in patients affected by SSHL, factors that influence the response to systemic and intratympanic steroid treatment. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 149 patients, all treated with systemic steroids. Moreover, patients not responsive to systemic therapy were treated with intratympanic steroids as salvage therapy. Auditory gain was assessed through the recovery rate at the discharge and after 30 days. Statistical analysis demonstrated that patients with delayed treatment and down-sloping auditory curve presented a poor recovery. Linear and stepwise regression showed that hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia were negative prognostic factors. The prognosis of SSHL is affected by hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia suggesting that a microvascular dysfunction within the cochlea could impair hearing recovery. Intratympanic steroid treatment was used as salvage treatment, however in patients with poor prognostic factors or at risk for side effects, it could be used in association with systemic treatment.

The Influence of Metabolic Syndrome on the Prognosis of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to verify the hypothesis that metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components affect the prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISNNHL).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary otology referral center.

PATIENTS

We divided patients who were diagnosed with ISSNHL between January 2015 and January 2018 into a MetS group and a Non-MetS group according to the diagnostic criteria of MetS.

INTERVENTIONS

We diagnosed ISSNHL patients by using pure-tone audiometry and treated them with oral steroids, blood flow promoting agents, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We used multivariate logistic analysis to identify prognostic factors of ISSNHL.

RESULTS

The MetS group comprised 94 patients, and the Non-MetS group comprised 162 subjects. Despite the rate of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and BMI, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). The rates of complete recovery and partial recovery of the MetS group were significantly lower than those of the Non-MetS group (p < 0.05). According to the multivariate analysis, MetS was significantly correlated with a poor prognosis (OR = 2.912, p = 0.008), and the OR increased with an increase in the number of MetS components. Late onset of treatment, high initial hearing threshold, and presence of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia were associated with a poor prognosis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of MetS may negatively affect the recovery of Chinese patients with ISSNHL, and the prognosis was poorer with an increase in the number of MetS components. Early onset of treatment, low initial hearing threshold and absence of diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia are associated with favorable hearing recovery.

The Prognostic Value of Circulating Inflammatory Cell Counts in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and the Effect of Cardiovascular Risk Factors

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies suggest that elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are poor prognostic factors in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We aimed to investigate the accuracy of this hypothesis by taking into account the effect of cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors.

METHODS

Medical records of 122 patients with SSNHL were reviewed retrospectively and grouped into 2 as; patients without CVR (group 1; n = 68) and patients having CVR (group 2; n = 54). Moreover, 60 control cases who did not have SSNHL were also included and grouped into 2 as; group 3 (n = 30) with CVR and group 4 (n = 30) healthy controls without having SSNHL or CVRs. Neutrophil (N), lymphocyte (L), platelet (Plt), NLR, and PLR between the groups and their relationship with the severity of hearing loss, recovery rates, and audiogram configurations were analyzed.

RESULTS

The highest N and NLR values were in group 1 and were significantly higher than the values of group 4 (P < .05, P < .01). There was no significant relationship between the groups in terms of L, Plt, or PLR values. The highest NLR and PLR values were determined in SSNHL patients with mild hearing loss, complete recovery, and up-sloping audiogram configuration (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of N and NLR may be considered as strong laboratory findings showing an inflammatory response in the diagnosis of SSNHL, but the presence of CVR factors does not seem to increase the inflammatory response in SSNHL as expected. In patients with SSNHL, NLR and PLR elevation may indicate better prognosis.

Intratympanic versus intravenous corticosteroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in diabetic patients: proposed study protocol for a prospective, randomized superiority trial

Background

Diabetes mellitus is associated with risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Systemic and intratympanic corticosteroids are the two primary treatments for SSNHL in patients with diabetes mellitus. The benefit of intratympanic compared to systemic treatment is the reduced systemic steroid exposure and associated systemic adverse effects. Intratympanic corticosteroid administration may have potential benefits over standard systemic therapies.

Methods/design

The proposed study is a prospective, randomized superiority trial. A total of 96 patients (48 in each group) will be randomized into the experimental or control group. Patients in the experimental group will receive four 1-mL doses of 40 mg/mL of methylprednisolone over a 1-week period, with a dose administered every 2 days via tympanic membrane injection into the middle ear. The control group will be administered intravenous methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day, maximal dose 60 mg/day) for 5 days. The primary outcome for this study is the change in hearing threshold from the first audiogram to the 30-day follow-up audiogram. Secondary outcome measures will include pure-tone average (PTA) at 90-day follow up, visual analog tinnitus scale, visual analog vertigo scale, visual analog aural fullness scale, fasting blood glucose and 2-h postprandial blood glucose during treatment, and the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels. Vital signs and otological physical examination will be performed at each follow-up visit.

Discussion

The efficacy and safety of intratympanic methylprednisolone compared to intravenous methylprednisolone will be investigated in patients with diabetes mellitus and SSNHL. This trial may provide strong evidence for the efficacy and safety of intratympanic corticosteroid treatment and important clinical information for the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus and SSNHL.

Trial registration

ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800015954. Registered on 2 May 2018, Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=25326.

Association between Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Preexisting Thyroid Diseases: A Nationwide Case-Control Study in Taiwan

Background: Little evidence is available about the risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in patients with thyroid diseases. We assessed whether a diagnosis of thyroid disease, particularly hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, is associated with SSNHL risk in an Asian population. Material and Methods: This case-control study was conducted with population-based data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from January 2000 to December 2013. The case group comprised 3331 adult patients with newly diagnosed SSNHL, and four controls without SSNHL for each case matched by sex, age, monthly income, and urbanization level of residence. Underlying Thyroid diseases were retrospectively evaluated in the case and control groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore relations between thyroid diseases and SSNHL. Results: Of the 3331 cases, 5.7% had preexisting thyroid diseases, whereas only 4.0% of the 13,324 controls had the same condition. After adjustment for sex, age, monthly income, urbanization level of residence, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic otitis media, and hyperlipidemia, associations were identified between a history of either hypothyroidism (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02–2.32; p = 0.042) or hyperthyroidism (AOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07–1.85; p = 0.015) and an elevated risk of SSNHL. In subgroup analysis, the correlation between hypothyroidism and increased SSNHL risk remained significant only for patients aged over 50 years (AOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01–2.57; p = 0.045), and that between hyperthyroidism and SSNHL was significant only for female patients (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09–2.01; p = 0.012). Treatment for hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism did not alter the association in subgroup analyses. Conclusion: Preexisting hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism appear associated with SSNHL susceptibility in Taiwan. Physicians should be wary of this elevated risk of SSNHL among patients with previously diagnosed thyroid dysfunction, especially women and patients aged more than 50 years.

Metabolic syndrome components and sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a case-control study

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular risk factors, including metabolic syndrome (MetS) components, were reported as possible risk factors of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between MetS (and its components) and SSNHL.

METHODS

Eighty-one SSNHL patients and 243 sex-, aged-matched controls participated from January 2018 to July 2019. The participants included 176 (54.3%) men and 148 (45.7%) women. The correlation between Mets components, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, and the onset of SSNHL was analyzed using used multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total 12 patients (14.8%) with SSNHL and 27 subjects (11.1%) in control group had MetS (p > 0.05). The rate of low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension was significantly higher in the SSNHL group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). A trend of odds SSNHL was observed with increasing the number of MetS components (p < 0.001). The multivariable analysis revealed that the rate of hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C concentration was significantly higher in the SSNHL groups compared to the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of HDL-C may be important factors in the pathogenesis of SSNHL, and should be assessed during the investigation of patients with this condition.

Effect of Diabetes on the Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical implications of diabetes for the management of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL).

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Tertiary referral center.

Subjects and Methods

ISSNHL patients (N = 403) who received inpatient management between January 2015 and December 2018 were analyzed. All were managed by a uniform treatment protocol of high-dose steroid therapy and salvage intratympanic steroid injections. Treatment results were evaluated according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery’s criteria 3 months after the start of treatment. We compared the clinical parameters and treatment outcomes of ISSNHL with and without diabetes. We also evaluated the influence of diabetes on the prognosis of ISSNHL by propensity score matching.

Results

Overall, of the 403 ISSNHL patients, 94 (23.3%) had diabetes, and 11 were newly diagnosed with diabetes. The patients with diabetes were older than those without diabetes ( P < .001), and their initial hearing threshold was significantly higher ( P < .001). The diabetic patients were hospitalized for a longer period, and their hearing recovery rate was lower. However, when age, sex, and initial hearing level were adjusted by propensity score matching, the diabetic patients and matched controls yielded similar treatment results.

Conclusions

ISSNHL with diabetes usually presents with severe hearing loss and requires longer hospitalization. However, diabetes itself may not influence the prognosis of ISSNHL. Proper management must be provided in ISSNHL with diabetes.

Effect of systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis on sudden sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

Recent reports have identified autoimmune systemic diseases as a significant risk factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We investigated whether systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were correlated with the hearing recovery of SSNHL.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHODS

Records of 663 SSNHL patients between January 2008 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, including demographic, comorbid diseases, and hearing recovery. Patients were divided into four groups (complete, partial, slight, and no recovery) according to Siegel's criteria and Chinese Medical Association of Otolaryngology (CMAO) criteria. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effects of onset of treatment, initial hearing threshold, audiogram pattern, diabetes mellitus, SLE, and RA on the prognosis of SSNHL according to both criteria.

RESULTS

Patients in complete recovery, partial recovery, slight recovery, and no improvement were 95 (14.3%), 183 (27.6%), 170 (25.6%), and 215 (32.4%) by Siegel's criteria, and 90 (13.6%), 152 (22.9%), 188 (28.4%), and 233 (35.1%) by CMAO criteria, respectively. Among the four groups, onset of treatment, initial hearing threshold, diabetes mellitus, SLE, RA, and profound audiogram pattern were found to be associated with recovery outcome by both Siegel's criteria and CMAO criteria (P < .05). According to analysis results, presence of SLE, RA, diabetes mellitus and higher initial hearing threshold were significantly correlated with a poor prognosis by both Siegel's criteria and CMAO criteria (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Comorbid SLE or RA may negatively affect the prognosis of SSNHL. Lower initial hearing threshold and absence of diabetes mellitus are associated with favorable hearing recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 130:2475-2480, 2020.

Epidemiology of Diabetes and Hearing Loss

Hearing loss is a highly prevalent chronic condition. In addition to age, sex, noise exposure, and genetic predisposition, cardiovascular disease and its antecedents may precipitate hearing loss. Of emerging interest is the connection between diabetes and auditory dysfunction. Cross-sectional studies consistently suggest that prevalence of hearing loss is higher in persons with diabetes compared with those without diabetes, especially among younger persons. Furthermore, longitudinal studies have demonstrated higher incidence of hearing loss in persons with diabetes compared to those without diabetes. These findings seem to hold for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, although considerably more population-based evidence is available for type 2 diabetes. Data on gestational diabetes and hearing outcomes are limited, as are data relating diabetes to otologic sequelae such as fungal infection. Here, we examine evidence from epidemiologic studies of diabetes and hearing loss and consider clinical and laboratory data where population-based data are lacking.

Association of Metabolic Syndrome With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Importance

Each of the 5 diagnostic criteria or factors of metabolic syndrome-hyperglycemia or type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, elevated triglyceride levels, and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level-is associated with the pathophysiologic features of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Little is known, however, about the association of metabolic syndrome, defined as the presence of at least 3 of these factors, with the prognosis of SSNHL.

Objective

To evaluate the association of metabolic syndrome with the rate of recovery from SSNHL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective medical record review of 124 patients treated for SSNHL at a single tertiary university hospital was performed from June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2016. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical characteristics and audiologic variables.

Exposure

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Correlation among demographic and clinical characteristics, audiologic results, and prognosis.

Results

Of the total 124 patients (52 men [41.9%]; 72 women [58.1%]; mean [SD] age, 56.0 [14.6] years), 70 had metabolic syndrome and 54 did not. Rates of type 2 diabetes (36 [51.4%] vs 6 [11.1%]; mean difference [MD], 40.3%; 95% CI, 24.4%-53.1%), hypertension (46 [65.7%] vs 9 [16.7%]; MD, 49.1%; 95% CI, 32.3%-61.7%), and obesity (47 [67.1%] vs 6 [11.1%]; MD%, 56.0; 95% CI, 40.0%-67.5%) and mean (SD) concentrations of triglycerides (192.9 [159.7] vs 133.4 [116.6] mg/dL; MD, 59.4 mg/dL; 95% CI, 53.0-65.9 mg/dL) were significantly higher and mean (SD) concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (45.8 [9.4] vs 62.6 [17.7] mg/dL; MD, 16.8 mg/dL; 95% CI, 16.1-17.4 mg/dL) were significantly lower in the group with metabolic syndrome than in the group without metabolic syndrome. Mean (SD) pure-tone audiometry thresholds were similar at baseline in the groups with and without metabolic syndrome (65.0 [24.2] vs 60.8 [24.2] dB; MD, 4.3 dB; 95% CI, 3.2-5.4 dB), but recovery rates after treatment were significantly lower in the group with metabolic syndrome (16 [22.9%] vs 23 [42.6%]; MD, -19.7%; 95% CI, -35.4% to -3.2%). No differences were found in the 5 factors among patients with metabolic syndrome who did and did not recover. Level of hearing loss was higher in patients with than without metabolic syndrome, but the difference was not statistically significant. Audiogram patterns also differed but not significantly. Hearing recovery rates were similar in patients with 3 factors of metabolic syndrome and those with none but differed significantly between patients with 4 or more factors and those without metabolic syndrome (4 [19.0%] vs 27 [50.0%]; MD, -31.0%; 95% CI, -48.1% to -6.4%).

Conclusions and Relevance

The rate of recovery from SSNHL was lower among patients with metabolic syndrome than among those without metabolic syndrome, and prognosis was poorer in patients with 4 or more diagnostic factors of the metabolic syndrome.

Metformin decreases the risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with diabetes mellitus: A 14-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss associated with metformin use in patients with diabetes mellitus has not been fully examined.

STUDY DESIGN

It is a retrospective matched-cohort study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We examined the medical records of patients with diabetes mellitus over 18 years old in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2013, to establish matched cohorts (14,109 with and 42,327 without metformin use) at a ratio of 1:3 by sex, age and index year.

RESULTS

We used a Cox regression hazard model to identify risk factors of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during 14 years of follow-up, and the results indicate that a significantly lower percentage of diabetes mellitus patients with metformin use (p = 0.033) developed sudden sensorineural hearing loss compared with those without metformin use (0.21%, 29/14,109 vs 0.32%, 136/42,327). After adjustment for age and other variables [adjusted hazard ratio: 0.630 (95% confidence interval: 0.422-0.941, p = 0.024)], this study also demonstrated that metformin use appeared to reduce the risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated an association between metformin use and lower incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss among patients with diabetes mellitus.

Impact of metabolic syndrome on recovery of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

PURPOSE

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was reported to a risk factor of developing idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), but limited data exist on its effect on the recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of (MetS) and its components on recovery of patients with ISSNHL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

228 ISSNHL patients were divided into MetS group and Non-MetS group according to the diagnostic criteria of MetS, and demographic and clinical characteristics and hearing recovery were reviewed between two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 86 (37.7%) patients in MetS group, and 142 (62.3%) patients in Non-MetS group. The rate of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, low HDL-C, high TG and obesity were significantly higher in the MetS group than those in the Non-MetS group (P < 0.05). The complete recovery rate and partial recovery rate were significantly lower in the MetS group than those in the Non-MetS group. According to the multivariate analysis, MetS was significantly associated with a poor prognosis; high initial hearing threshold and presence of diabetes mellitus were correlated with a poor prognosis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that MetS has a negative impact on the hearing recovery of ISSNHL. High initial hearing threshold and diabetes mellitus were indictors of a poor prognosis of ISSNHL.

Risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with dysrhythmia: A nationwide population-based cohort study

Objective

Whether dysrhythmia is a risk factor of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk of developing SSNHL among patients with dysrhythmia in different age and gender groups by using population-based data in Taiwan.

Methods

We conducted a matched cohort study by analyzing data between January 2000 and December 2013 obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. 41,842 newly diagnosed dysrhythmia patients and 83,684 comparison subjects without dysrhythmia were selected from claims. The incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss at the end of 2013 was determined in both groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the risk of SSNHL among patients with dysrhythmia.

Results

The incidence of SSNHL was 1.30-fold higher in the dysrhythmia group compared with the control group (53.2 versus 40.9 per 100,000 person-years), and using Cox proportional hazard regressions, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.70). Gender-stratified analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of SSNHL in patients with dysrhythmia than in those without dysrhythmia for both men and women (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.02–1.76, P = 0.039, HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02–1.78, P = 0.035, respectively). Age-stratified analysis revealed remarkable associations between dysrhythmia and SSNHL among those aged less than 40 years and more than 65 years (HR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.03–4.64, P = 0.043 and HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.14–2.09, P = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusions

Our findings support dysrhythmia as an independent risk factor for SSNHL. Based on the study results, clinicians managing patients with dysrhythmia should be aware of the increased risk of developing SSNHL, especially among patients aged <40 and >65 years, and counsel patients to seek medical advice immediately if they experience any acute change in their hearing ability.

Efficacy of intratympanic corticosteroid, intravenous batroxobin and combined treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss with type-2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Intratympanic corticosteroid (IC), intravenous batroxobin (IB) as the treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) has been reported. However, the data on combination therapy (CT) was scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of IC, IB, and CT in the treatment of SSNHL with diabetes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 212 SSNHL patients with diabetes, who were initially treated within 14 days of onset of disease, were divided into three groups by treatment modality. The hearing recovery was evaluated by the results of pure-tone test after completion of treatment. The prognostic factors, including age, severity of initial hearing loss, duration to onset of treatment, and audiometric curve type, were further compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in hearing recovery by the treatment (p < .05). Recovery rates in the CT group were significantly higher in patients with early treatment than with delayed treatment (p = .021). However, duration and recovery rate was not significantly correlated in IC and IB group (p > .05). In patients recieving early treatment, the recovery rate in CT group was significantly higher than that in IC (p = .013) and IB group (p = .029). Regardless of treatment, the recovery rates were higher in patients with flat and ascending audiograms (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Patients receiving combined therapy, especially in the early stage of SSNHL, could achieve significantly superior recovery in the treatment of SSNHL with diabetes, compared with those using IC or IB alone.

Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Combined Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Purpose Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a clinical emergency with an increased incidence of occurrence in recent years. Hyperbaric oxygen has been widely used in the clinical treatment of sudden hearing loss. However, prognostic factors related to its curative effects are still not clear, which hinders its clinical application. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and prognostic factors of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) plus drug therapies in the treatment of sudden hearing loss. Method Patients with sudden hearing loss who were treated with hyperbaric oxygen from April to October 2017 were retrospectively included. Clinical information was collected, including pure-tone audiometry data before and after hyperbaric oxygen treatment, age, gender, hearing curve classification, concomitant symptoms, history of diseases (diabetes and hypertension), history of hormone therapy, start time of hyperbaric oxygen treatment, and total number of hyperbaric oxygen treatments. The prognostic factors were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Sixty-four patients with sudden hearing loss were enrolled, including 7 cases of low-frequency loss, 4 cases of high-frequency loss, 32 cases of flat loss, and 21 cases of complete hearing loss. After HBOT, there were 16 cases (25%) of complete recovery, 15 cases (23.43%) of partial recovery, 7 cases (10.93%) of slight improvement, and 26 cases (40.63%) of no improvement. The total effective rate was 59.37%. Twelve of 21 cases (57.14%) of complete hearing loss showed recovery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the start time of HBOT ≤ 7 days from disease onset was independently associated with hearing recovery ( OR = 27.763, 95% CI [4.209, 183.115], p = .001). Conclusion Combined HBOT can improve the hearing impairment of sudden hearing loss. The early HBOT showed the most promising therapeutic effects, especially among patients with complete hearing loss.

Metabolic syndrome is associated with hearing disturbance

BACKGROUND

Although metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been associated with various diseases, few studies to date have addressed the association between MetS and hearing loss.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

This cross-sectional review of health examination center data sought to determine the association between MetS and hearing disturbance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study involved 28,866 subjects. Height, weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured, and basic blood tests and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) were performed. Other factors analyzed included body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia.

RESULTS

Age and gender did not differ between subjects with and without MetS. PTA was slightly higher in subjects with than without MetS, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .47). The incidence of hearing loss was no higher in subjects who met three of the five diagnostic criteria of MetS than in those who met 0-2 criteria, but was significantly higher in subjects who met four (p = .04) and five (p < .01) criteria.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

MetS may be associated with hearing loss, especially in subjects who meet four or five of the diagnostic criteria for MetS.

Impairment of extra-high frequency auditory thresholds in subjects with elevated levels of fasting blood glucose

This study was performed to assess whether there is an association between elevated Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) and hearing impairment in Bangladeshi population. A total of 142 subjects (72 with elevated FBG; 70 control) were included in the study. The mean auditory thresholds of the control subjects at 1, 4, 8 and 12 kHz frequencies were 6.35 ± 0.35, 10.07 ± 0.91, 27.57 ± 1.82, 51.28 ± 3.01 dB SPL (decibel sound pressure level), respectively and that of the subjects with elevated FBG were 8.33 ± 0.66, 14.37 ± 1.14, 38.96 ± 2.23, and 71.11 ± 2.96 dB, respectively. The auditory thresholds of the subjects with elevated FBG were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the control subjects at all the above frequencies, although hearing impairment was most evidently observed at an extra-high (12 kHz) frequency. Subjects with a long duration of diabetes (>10 years) showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher level of auditory thresholds at 8 and 12 kHz, but not at 1 and 4 kHz frequencies, compared to subjects with shorter duration of diabetes (≤10 years). In addition, based on the data of odds ratio, more acute impairment of hearing at the extra-high frequency was observed in diabetic subjects of both older (>40 years) and younger (≤40 years) age groups compared to the respective controls. The binary logistic regression analysis showed a 5.79-fold increase in the odds of extra-high frequency hearing impairment in diabetic subjects after adjustment for age, gender and BMI. This study provides conclusive evidence that auditory threshold at an extra-high frequency could be a sensitive marker for hearing impairment in diabetic subjects.

Susceptibility of Diabetic Mice to Noise Trauma

Diabetes can lead to many end-organ complications. However, the association between diabetes and hearing loss is not well understood. Here, we investigated the effect of noise exposure on diabetic mice compared with wild-type mice. Hearing threshold shifts, histopathologic changes in the cochlea, and inflammatory responses were evaluated over time. After noise exposure, more severe hearing threshold shifts, auditory hair cell loss, and synaptopathies were notable in diabetic mice compared with wild-type mice. Moreover, increased inflammatory responses and reactive oxygen species production were observed in the ears of diabetic mice. The results demonstrated that diabetic mice are more susceptible to noise trauma.

Correlational Study of Diabetic Retinopathy and Hearing Loss

PURPOSE

Our research goal was to complete a retrospective chart review to determine if there is a correlation between the level of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic neurosensory hearing loss.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 175 Department of Veterans Affairs Computerized Patient Record System charts was completed at the VA Portland Health Care System. Subjects were classified by degree of diabetic retinopathy as follows: no diabetic retinopathy (n = 80), mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 51), moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 25), and combined severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (n = 17). Degree of sensorineural hearing was collected for each ear. Additionally, measures of diabetic control, including hemoglobin A1C, and creatinine, were recorded.

RESULTS

After controlling for diabetic control, as measured by HbA1C and creatinine, level of diabetic retinopathy was significantly associated with hearing loss severity in both ears (right ear, P = .018 and left ear, P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

When adjusted to include diabetes control, the severity of diabetic retinopathy showed a correlation with degree of hearing loss at most levels. Because of this association, recommendation for hearing evaluations may be considered for those with mild, moderate, or severe nonproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Características audiológicas de pacientes com diabetes mellitus Tipo 2

RESUMO Objetivos: identificar as características audiológicas de pacientes com diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Métodos: estudo transversal, realizado em unidade de atenção secundária para diabetes em Fortaleza, de abril a julho de 2010. Amostra composta por 152 pacientes diabéticos tipo 2, independente do sexo, entre 36 e 60 anos. Realizou-se audiometria tonal liminar (ATL), emissões otoacústicas evocadas por estímulo transiente (EOAT) e emissões otoacústicas evocadas-produto de distorção (EOAPD). Resultados: associação da idade e do tempo de diagnóstico com a presença de perda auditiva, e do tempo de diagnóstico com a ausência de EOAPD. Observou-se perda auditiva sensorioneural em 63,2% dos pacientes, das quais 71,9% eram bilaterais e 75% simétricas. Aproximadamente, 50% das perdas auditivas apresentaram configuração plana. As EOAT estavam ausentes em 75% dos pacientes e as EOAPD em 78,9%. Houve ausência de emissões otoacústicas na presença de ATL normal, em média, em 32% dos pacientes à direita e 48% à esquerda. Já a presença de emissões otoacústicas na ocorrência de perda auditiva foi observada em, aproximadamente, 30% dos pacientes para EOAT e 14% para EOAPD à direita; e 25% para EOAT e 11% para EOAPD à esquerda. Conclusão: predomínio de perda auditiva sensorioneural bilateral simétrica com configuração plana, e ausência de EOAT e EOAPD. A análise da associação dos resultados da ATL e das emissões otoacústicas sugere prejuízo das células ciliadas externas da cóclea ou possível neuropatia auditiva. Tais achados justificariam o monitoramento da audição destes pacientes, bem como a realização de testes específicos para avaliação do sistema auditivo central.

Beyond what the eye can see

A 45-year-old woman presented with acute sequential optic neuropathy resulting in bilateral complete blindness. No significant visual recovery occurred. Past medical history was relevant for severe preeclampsia with resultant renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and sudden bilateral hearing loss when she was 38 years old. There was a family history of diabetes mellitus in her mother. Testing for common causes of bilateral optic neuropathy did not reveal a diagnosis for her illness. The maternal and personal history of diabetes and deafness prompted testing for mitochondrial disease. The 3 primary mitochondrial DNA mutations responsible for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy were absent, but the patient was subsequently found to have a disease causing mitochondrial DNA mutation, m.13513G>A. The case illustrates the importance of early testing for mitochondrial disease and demonstrates that Leber hereditary optic neuropathy-like presentations may be missed if testing is limited to the 3 primary mutations.

Comparison of steroid administration methods in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the recovery rates of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) treated with oral systemic steroids (PO) or intratympanic steroid injection (IT) or both.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with ISSHL within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. The patients were divided into three groups by treatment modality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Threshold of pure-tone tests, age, accompanying symptoms and underlying diseases were compared. The level of final hearing recovery was evaluated by the application of the results of the pure-tone test that was performed at least 3 months after the completion of each treatment.

RESULTS

Final hearing recovery rate differed significantly by the type of treatment (P = 0.031). Recovery rates in the PO and combined groups were significantly higher in patients with mild (85.1% and 88.6%, respectively) than with profound (52.8% and 69.0%, respectively) hearing loss (P < 0.05). In contrast, severity and recovery rate were not significantly correlated in the IT group (P > 0.05). Combined treatment yielded significantly higher recovery rates than other treatment modalities in patients without hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

In the group treated with combined therapy, better hearing improvement was obtained than in the groups treated with systemic steroid only or with intratympanic steroid injection only without complications. These findings suggest that the combination of systemic administration and intratympanic injection may improve patient prognosis.

Prognostic Factors in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is still a complex and challenging process which requires clinical evidence regarding its etiology, treatment and prognostic factors. Therefore, determination of prognostic factors might aid in the selection of proper treatment modality.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to analyze whether there is correlation between SSNHL outcomes and (1) systemic steroid therapy, (2) time gap between onset of symptoms and initiation of therapy and (3) audiological pattern of hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed at our clinic with SSNHL between May 2005 and December 2011 were reviewed. A detailed history of demographic features, side of hearing loss, previous SSNHL and/or ear surgery, recent upper respiratory tract infection, season of admission, duration of symptoms before admission and the presence of co-morbid diseases was obtained. Radiological and audiological evaluations were recorded and treatment protocol was assessed to determine whether systemic steroids were administered or not. Treatment started ≤5 days was regarded as "early" and >5 days as "delayed". Initial audiological configurations were grouped as "upward sloping", "downward sloping", "flat" and "profound" hearing loss. Significant recovery was defined as thresholds improved to the same level with the unaffected ear or improved ≥30 dB on average. Slight recovery was hearing improvement between 10-30dB on average. Hearing recovery less than 10 dB was accepted as unchanged.

RESULTS

Among the 181 patients who met the inclusion criteria, systemic steroid was administered to 122 patients (67.4%), whereas 59 (32.6%) patients did not have steroids. It was found that steroid administration did not have any statistically significant effect in either recovered or unchanged hearing groups. Early treatment was achieved in 105 patients (58%) and 76 patients (42%) had delayed treatment. Recovery rates were no different in these two groups; however, when unchanged hearing rates were compared, it was statistically significantly lower in the early treatment group (p<0.05). When hearing outcomes were compared according to initial audiological pattern, significant recovery and unchanged hearing rates did not differ between groups; however, slight recovery rate was highest in the "flat" type audiological configuration (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to this patient series, oral steroid therapy does not have any influence on the outcomes of SSNHL. However, mid-frequency hearing loss of flat type and initiation of treatment earlier than 5 days from the onset of symptoms, seem to have positive prognostic effects. Further randomized controlled subject groups might contribute to determine prognostic factors of SSNHL.

Slowing the progression of age-related hearing loss: Rationale and study design of the ASPIRIN in HEARING, retinal vessels imaging and neurocognition in older generations (ASPREE-HEARING) trial

BACKGROUND

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is a leading cause of disability in the elderly. Low-grade inflammation and microvessel pathology may be responsible for initiating or exacerbating some of the hearing loss associated with aging. A growing body of evidence demonstrates an association of hearing loss with cognitive decline. A shared etiological pathway may include a role of inflammation, alongside vascular determinants. The ASPREE-HEARING study aims to determine whether low-dose aspirin decreases the progression of ARHL, and if so, whether this decrease in progression is also associated with retinal microvascular changes and/or greater preservation of cognitive function.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A three year double-blind, randomized controlled trial of oral 100mg enteric-coated aspirin or matching placebo, enrolling 1262 Australians aged ≥70years with normal cognitive function and no overt cardiovascular disease. The primary outcome is the change in mean pure tone average hearing threshold (decibels) in the better ear, over a 3-year period. Secondary outcomes consist of changes in retinal microvascular indicators, and changes in cognitive function. Participants are recruited from a larger trial, ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), which is designed to assess whether daily low dose aspirin will extend disability-free life.

DISCUSSION

ASPREE-HEARING will determine whether aspirin slows development or progression of ARHL, and will interrogate the relationship between inflammatory and microvascular mechanisms that may underlie the effects of aspirin on ARHL. This study will improve understanding of the patterns of comorbidity with, and the relationships between, aging and ARHL, alongside modeling the impacts of ARHL.

Increased risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with depressive disorders: population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence rates and risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss among patients with depressive disorders.

METHOD

Data for 27 547 patients with newly diagnosed depressive disorders and 27 547 subjects without depressive disorders between 2001 and 2008 were yielded from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss incidence at the end of 2011 was determined. Cumulative incidence and adjusted hazard ratio were computed.

RESULTS

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss incidence was 1.45 times higher in the depressive disorders group compared to the non-depressive disorders group (p = 0.0041), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.460. A significant increased risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss was noted in patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and hyperlipidaemia (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest an increased risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with depressive disorders. Co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and hyperlipidaemia significantly aggravated the risk. Depressive disorders might be considered a risk factor for sudden sensorineural hearing loss. It remains to be seen whether control of depressive disorders can decrease the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with depressive disorders.

Gallstone is correlated with an increased risk of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to test the hypothesis that gallstone disease (GSD) is a risk factor for the development of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Research has shown risks of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with GSD; however, well-conducted English studies on the association between GSD and the development of ISSNHL are lacking.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database.

PARTICIPANTS

We compared 26,449 patients diagnosed with GSD between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2007, with 52,898 age-matched, gender-matched and comorbidities propensity scores-matched controls.

OUTCOME MEASURED

We followed each patient until the end of 2011 and evaluated the incidence of ISSNHL for at least 4 years after the initial GSD diagnosis.

RESULTS

The incidence of ISSNHL was 1.42 times higher in the GS cohort than in the non-GS cohort (9.27 vs 6.52/10,000 person-years). Using Cox proportional hazard regressions, the adjusted HR was 1.44 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.74). In the cohort of patients with GSD who needed a cholecystectomy, 37 patients suffered from ISSNHL. Among those patients, 31 (83.7%) patients sustained ISSNHL before cholecystectomy and 6 (16.2%) patients sustained ISSNHL after cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A diagnosis of GSD may be an independent risk for ISSNHL. This finding suggests that an underlying vascular and inflammatory mechanism may contribute to the development of ISSNHL. Physicians may want to counsel patients with GSD to seek medical attention if they have hearing impairments, because patients may be at an increased risk of developing ISSNHL.