Outcomes in Patients with Severe Preexisting Renal Dysfunction After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Improvement of persistent anuria in severe myocardial infarction: the potential role of Impella 5.5 as a bridge to decision

A man in his 40s with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock was transferred to our hospital. Emergent percutaneous coronary intervention for the left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries supported with Impella CP was performed. However, his cardiac function was severely impaired, and anuria developed, necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). After Impella CP was removed on day 6, the patient remained dependent on inotropes and CRRT. Following volume reduction to manage pulmonary congestion, symptoms of low perfusion appeared. Then, Impella 5.5 was inserted on day 38 as a bridge to decision. On day 52, the urine volume reached >2000 mL/day, and CRRT was discontinued. On day 56, the patient was transferred to a certified facility for left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation. This case suggests the potential of Impella 5.5 as a bridge to decision in patients with organ failure caused by low cardiac output.

Renal Dysfunction in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device

Late-stage heart failure and renal dysfunction are often seen in conjunction. Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) describes the complex interaction between the two disease states. Early literature described the pathophysiology of CRS as related only to reduced cardiac output and decreased renal perfusion. Recent literature suggests a more multifaceted mechanism. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), used as bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in patients with heart failure, impact not only cardiac function but also renal function, especially in those patients with preoperative renal dysfunction. The mechanism by which LVAD implantation affects renal function is complex and understated in early literature. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis of CRS, the impact of preoperative renal dysfunction in patients undergoing LVAD implantation, and the effect of LVAD implantation on postoperative renal function.

Peritoneal dialysis and LVAD bridge to successful heart-kidney transplant

Kidney injury and cardio-renal syndrome is a common complication of end-stage cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Although renal function often improves after placement of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), this is frequently not sustained, and many patients progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In-centre haemodialysis (HD) is the most common dialysis modality in patients with LVADs and there are only rare case reports of maintenance dialysis with peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with VADs. Barriers to the use of PD as renal replacement modality in patients with LVAD include lack of familiarity with acute-start PD, concerns regarding interruption of anticoagulation for PD catheter placement and historic concerns of PD-associated peritonitis risk causing VAD drive-line infection, though this risk is reduced with modern pre-peritoneal VAD drive-lines. PD may offer advantages in this cohort including improved haemodynamic stability and avoidance of vascular access, with lower rates of bloodstream infections as compared to HD. PD may also aid preservation and restoration of kidney function in patients with LVADs and kidney injury. We report a case of a patient with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and existing LVAD, with ESKD managed successfully with maintenance PD. The patient was maintained on PD for 10 months prior to a subsequent successful combined heart-kidney transplant.

Recovery after acute kidney injury requiring kidney replacement therapy in patients with left ventricular assist device: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with an incidence of 37%; 13% of which require kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Severe AKI requiring KRT (AKI-KRT) in LVAD patients is associated with high short and long-term mortality compared with AKI without KRT. While kidney function recovery is associated with better outcomes, its incidence is unclear among LVAD patients with severe AKI requiring KRT.

AIM

To identify studies evaluating the recovery rates from severe AKI-KRT after LVAD placement, which is defined by regained kidney function resulting in the discontinuation of KRT. Random-effects and generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian-Laird were used to combine the effect estimates obtained from individual studies.

METHODS

A total of 268 patients from 14 cohort studies that reported severe AKI-KRT after LVAD were included. Follow-up time ranged anywhere from two weeks of LVAD implantation to 12 mo. Kidney recovery occurred in 78% of enrollees at the time of hospital discharge or within 30 d. Overall, the pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 50.5% (95%CI: 34.0%-67.0%) at 12 mo follow up. Majority (85%) of patients used continuous-flow LVAD. While the data on pulsatile-flow LVAD was limited, subgroup analysis of continuous-flow LVAD demonstrated that pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 52.1% (95%CI: 36.8%-67.0%). Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant association between study year and AKI recovery rate (P = 0.08). There was no publication bias as assessed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test in all analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 268 patients from 14 cohort studies that reported severe AKI-KRT after LVAD were included. Follow-up time ranged anywhere from two weeks of LVAD implantation to 12 mo. Kidney recovery occurred in 78% of enrollees at the time of hospital discharge or within 30 d. Overall, the pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 50.5% (95%CI: 34.0%-67.0%) at 12 mo follow up. Majority (85%) of patients used continuous-flow LVAD. While the data on pulsatile-flow LVAD was limited, subgroup analysis of continuous-flow LVAD demonstrated that pooled estimated AKI recovery rate among patients with severe AKI-KRT was 52.1% (95%CI: 36.8%-67.0%). Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant association between study year and AKI recovery rate (P = 0.08). There was no publication bias as assessed by the funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test in all analyses.

CONCLUSION

Recovery from severe AKI-KRT after LVAD occurs approximately 50.5%, and it has not significantly changed over the years despite advances in medicine.

Peritoneal dialysis improves quality-of-life in a left ventricular assist device destination therapy patient-a case report

BACKGROUND

Progressive renal insufficiency is frequent in heart failure patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The optimal strategy for long-term dialysis in LVAD patients and its effect on quality-of-life in these patients remain to be determined.

CASE SUMMARY

Our 55-year-old patient with pre-existing renal insufficiency received an LVAD as destination therapy because of advanced ischaemic heart failure. Six years after implantation, he developed end-stage renal disease for which peritoneal dialysis (PD) was initiated. Left ventricular assist device flow alterations during ultrafiltration did not cause clinical or technical problems. The patient's exercise capacity increased and quality-of-life improved. Over 7.5 years after LVAD implantation and 16 months after PD initiation, he died from encephalitis.

DISCUSSION

Despite initial improvement, renal function often gradually decreases after LVAD implantation. Data on long-term renal replacement therapy in LVAD patients are limited. Haemodialysis is most commonly applied. Conceptually, however, PD has advantages over haemodialysis including less bloodstream infections, less haemodynamic shifts, and the comfort of the ambulant setting. This case illustrates that PD in an LVAD patient is feasible and improves quality-of-life. Key factors contributing to successful PD in LVAD patients may be a good right ventricular function and close cardiology-nephrology collaboration.

Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review

Background

End stage heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and its prevalence is expected to rise with the ageing population. For suitable patients, orthotopic heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy, however, a paucity of donor organs has led to the development of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). These devices can be utilized as either a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or as an alternative to heart transplantation. While these devices can prolong life and improve quality of life, they are associated with a significant number of adverse events. We aim to systematically review the literature to quantify survival and the incidence of adverse events following implantation of continuous-flow LVADs (cf-LVAD).

Methods

A systematic review was performed to determine outcomes following implantation of a cf-LVAD. Primary outcomes were survival and frequency of adverse events (such as bleeding, infection, thrombosis, stroke and right ventricular failure). Secondary outcomes included quality of life and assessment of functional status.

Results

Sixty-three studies reported clinical outcomes of 9,280 patients. Survival after cf-LVAD varied between studies. Industry-funded trials generally reported better overall survival than the single- and multi-center case series, which showed significant variation. The largest registry report documented twelve, twenty-four and forty-eight-month survival rates of 82%, 72% and 57% respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events were gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), device-related infection, neurological events and right heart failure (RHF). Bleeding, RHF and infection were the most frequent complications experienced by those supported with cf-LVAD, occurring in up to 35%, 40% and 55% of patients, respectively. Quality of life as measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and functional status as measured with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) improved after cf-LVAD implantation with no decline evident two years after implantation.

Conclusions

The paucity of donor hearts has led to the development of left-ventricular assist devices as a BTT or as a destination therapy (DT). Outcomes after cf-LVAD implantation are excellent, with short-term survival comparable to heart transplantation, but long-term survival remains limited due to the incidence of post-implantation adverse events. Despite these complications, quality of life and functional status improve significantly post-implantation and remain improved over the long-term. This study demonstrates the potential benefits of cf-LVAD therapy whilst also identifying adverse events as an area of increased morbidity and mortality.

Cardiorenal Syndrome

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) describes a specific acute and chronic clinical picture in which the heart or the kidney are primarily dysfunctioning and secondarily affect each other. CRS is divided into five classes: acute and chronic CRS, acute and chronic renocardiac syndromes, and secondary dysfunction of heart and kidneys. This article specifically details the classification and the epidemiology, some risk factors, and the pathophysiology of CRS. Some emerging aspects of CRS are also discussed, such as CRS in patients with end-stage heart failure, with mechanical ventricular assistance, and after heart transplantation. Finally, some aspects of pediatric CRS are detailed.

Improvement in Kidney Function After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Its Influence on Thromboembolism, Hemorrhage, and Mortality

Although heart transplantation remains the gold standard for management of heart failure, ventricular assist devices (VAD) have emerged as viable alternatives. VAD implantation improves kidney function. However, whether the improvement is sustained or associated with improved outcomes is unclear. Herein we assess kidney function improvement, predictors of improvement, and associations with thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and mortality in VAD patients. Kidney function was defined using chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages: stage 1 (glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 2 (eGFR 60-90 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 3a (eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 3b (eGFR 30-44 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 4 (eGFR 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m), and stage 5 (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m). Improvement in kidney function was defined as an improvement in eGFR that resulted in a CKD stage change to one of lesser severity. Kidney function improved post implant, and was maintained over 1 year for all patients, except those with baseline stage 5 CKD. Younger age at implantation (OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96, P < 0.0001) was associated with sustained improvement in kidney function. Poor kidney function was associated increased mortality but not with thromboembolism or hemorrhage. Compared to patients with baseline eGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73 m; patients with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m had a higher mortality risk (HR 3.32, 95% CI: 1.10-9.98, p = 0.03 for stage 3b; HR 4.07, 95% CI: 1.27-13.1, p = 0.02 for stage 4; and HR 4.01, 95% CI: 1.17-13.7, p = 0.03 for stage 5 CKD). Kidney function was not associated with thromboembolism or hemorrhage, and sustained improvement was not associated with lower risk of death. However, poor kidney function at implantation was associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Incidence and impact of acute kidney injury on patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices: a Meta-analysis

Background: We aimed to evaluate the acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and its associated risk of mortality in patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD).Methods: A systematic literature search in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases was conducted through January 2020 to identify studies that provided data on the AKI incidence and AKI-associated mortality risk in adult patients with implantable LVADs. Pooled effect estimates were examined using random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian-Laird.Results: Fifty-six cohort studies with 63,663 LVAD patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of reported AKI was 24.9% (95%CI: 20.1%-30.4%) but rose to 36.9% (95%CI: 31.1%-43.1%) when applying the standard definition of AKI per RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO criteria. The pooled incidence of severe AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) was 12.6% (95%CI: 10.5%-15.0%). AKI incidence did not differ significantly between types of LVAD (p = .35) or indication for LVAD use (p = .62). While meta-regression analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between study year and overall AKI incidence (p = .55), the study year was negatively correlated with the incidence of severe AKI requiring RRT (slope = -0.068, p < .001). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of mortality at 30 days and one year in AKI patients were 3.66 (95% CI, 2.00-6.70) and 2.22 (95% CI, 1.62-3.04), respectively. The pooled ORs of mortality at 30 days and one year in severe AKI patients requiring RRT were 7.52 (95% CI, 4.58-12.33) and 5.41 (95% CI, 3.63-8.06), respectively.Conclusion: We found that more than one-third of LVAD patients develop AKI based on standard definitions, and 13% develop severe AKI requiring RRT. There has been a potential improvement in the incidence of severe AKI requiring RRT for LVAD patients. AKI in LVAD patients was associated with increased 30-day and 1 year mortality.

Impaired Baseline Renal Function May Not Influence Outcomes and Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

We investigated changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant and the impact on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for 255 patients with LVADs, divided into 2 groups based on preimplant eGFR (<60 or >60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and into 6 grades (grade 1, >90 mL/min/1.73 m² normal; grade 2, 60-89 mild dysfunction; grade 3, 45-59 moderate; grade 4, 30-44 moderate to severe; grade 5, 15-29 severe; or grade 6, <15 kidney failure). Changes in eGFR and the impact on long-term outcome and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

One-month postimplant eGFR of the total cohort increased from a baseline of 75.19 ± 34.35 to 118.97 ± 67.62 mL/min/1.73 m²(P < .001). eGRF 4 years postimplant was higher than baseline but not significantly (P = .48). Patients with a preimplant eGFR > 60 followed the same pattern as the entire cohort. The preimplant eGFR < 60 group had a significant increase at 1 month (P < .001), eGFR remained significantly higher than baseline 4 years postimplant (P = .032), and there was a sustained transition to improved distribution of renal function grade after LVAD implant. Post-LVAD implant survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for baseline eGFR > 60 was 76%, 54%, and 48% and for eGFR < 60 was 71%, 60%, and 48%, respectively (P = .92).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a low preimplant eGFR derive benefit from LVAD therapy, with eGFR remaining elevated above preimplant levels. Preimplant renal dysfunction did not impact negatively on long-term morbidity and mortality.

Use of Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplantation for Advanced Heart Failure

There are only 2 treatments for the thousands of patients who progress to the most advanced form of heart failure despite the application of guideline-based medical therapy, use of ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation. There has been a great deal of progress in both of these therapies that have led to improved outcomes including significant improvement in survival and functional capacity. Heart transplantation offers the best short- and long-term survival for patients with end-stage heart failure, and the majority of these recipients achieve relatively limitless functional capacity for their age. However, the chronic shortage of available donors limits the number of recipients in the United States to an only 2500 patients/y or only a fraction of potential candidates. The significant improvement in outcomes now possible with durable ventricular assist devices has led to a significant increase in their use, which now exceeds the volume of heart transplants in the United States, with the greatest growth in use for those not considered to be candidates for heart transplantation, previously referred to as destination therapy. This article will review the substantial progress that has taken place for both of these life-saving treatment options, as well as the future directions.

Comparison of Renal Outcomes in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device and Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Renal function is a major consideration for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. We compared serial changes in renal function and outcomes between patients who underwent OHT and LVAD therapy over 12 months.

METHODS

Forty-five and 58 consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation (all bridge to transplant or candidacy) and OHT from April 2014 to November 2016 were included. Six of these patients were in both LVAD and OHT cohorts. Survival analysis was calculated using Kaplan Meier and log rank methods. Univariate analysis of data was performed using χ², Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests where appropriate. Comparisons of the renal function to baseline were conducted using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Renal function had a biphasic course among the LVAD cohort, increasing at 30 days but reducing at 6 and 12 months. Meanwhile, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was seen to progressively decline among OHT recipients. Altogether, eGFR was significantly higher at 6 and 12 months among the LVAD cohort compared to OHT (68.3 vs 59.4, P = .046; 68.3 vs 50.4, P = .015). Compared to the baseline average, eGFR had risen among the LVAD patients (P = .031) but had decreased among the OHT group (P < .001) at 12 months. No significant difference in survival was seen at 1 year (84.4% vs 81.0%; P = .540) and 2 years (78.3% vs 78.8%, P = .687) between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Despite poorer baseline renal function, LVAD therapy was associated with comparable survival and better renal outcomes compared to OHT at 12 months. Renal impairment may favor the use of LVAD therapy over OHT in the short term.

Predictors and Outcomes of Renal Replacement Therapy After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the frequency and outcomes of patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) early after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined use of in-hospital RRT and outcomes in consecutive adults who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation from February 15, 2007, through August 8, 2017. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of RRT. The associations of RRT with outcomes were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 354 patients who underwent LVAD implantation, 54 (15%) required in-hospital RRT. Patients receiving RRT had higher preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index values (median, 5 vs 4; P=.03), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (mean, 19.0 vs 14.5; P<.001), right atrial pressure (mean, 19.1 vs 13.4 mm Hg; P<.001), and estimated 24-hour urine protein levels (median, 357 vs 174 mg; P<.001) and lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (median, 43 vs 57 mL/min; P<.001) and measured GFR using ¹²⁵I-iothalamate clearance (median, 33 vs 51 mL/min; P=.001) than those who did not require RRT. Approximately 40% of patients with eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m² and 24-hour urine protein level greater than 400 mg required RRT vs 6% with eGFR greater than45 mL/min/1.73 m² and without significant proteinuria. Lower preoperative eGFR, higher estimated 24-hour urine protein level, higher right atrial pressure, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent predictors of RRT after LVAD implantation. Of patients requiring in-hospital RRT, 18 (33%) had renal recovery, 18 (33%) required outpatient hemodialysis, and 18 (33%) died before hospital discharge. After median (Q1, Q3) follow-up of 24.3 (8.9, 49.6) months, RRT was associated with increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.86; 95% CI, 1.90-4.33; P<.001) and gastrointestinal bleeding (adjusted HR, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.57-7.75; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In-hospital RRT is associated with poor prognosis after LVAD. A detailed preoperative assessment of renal function before LVAD may be helpful in risk stratification and patient selection.

Preoperative renal dysfunction does not affect outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation

OBJECTIVE

Selection criteria for durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remain unclear. One such criterion is renal function. In this study we evaluated outcomes of LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative renal dysfunction.

METHODS

Patients with implanted LVADs as destination therapy (DT) or bridge to transplantation (BTT) at a single institution between 2006 and 2015 were included. Primary stratification was according to pre-implantation glomerular filtration rate (GFR): >60 mL/min versus <60 mL/min or dialysis dependence. The primary outcome was post-LVAD implantation overall survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-eight patients underwent LVAD implantation during the study period as DT (60%; n = 142) or BTT (40%; n = 96). Reduced GFR was present in 56% (n = 132), with 8% (n = 18) being dialysis-dependent. Normal versus reduced GFR cohorts were well matched except for a higher incidence of coronary artery disease in the patients with reduced GFR (61% vs 48%; P = .04). Mean follow-up was 13.5 ± 17.0 months. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after LVAD implantation were similar between the cohorts for DT and BTT. Rates of transplantation were comparable in BTT patients (61% normal vs 53% reduced GFR; P = .43). Recovery of renal function to a GFR >60 mL/min occurred in 43% (n = 17) and 57% (n = 42) of patients with reduced GFR in the BTT and DT cohorts, respectively, by 1 year post implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Well selected patients with preexisting renal dysfunction can undergo LVAD implantation with acceptable outcomes. Approximately half of LVAD recipients with preimplantation renal dysfunction will recover normal renal function within the first postoperative year. Renal dysfunction alone should not serve as an absolute contraindication to LVAD therapy.

Renal Function Changes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Limited data assessing the clinical significance of post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in renal function are available. We aimed to investigate the impact of changes in renal function after LVAD implantation on subsequent long-term outcomes. We followed 184 patients with HeartMate II LVADs implanted between May 2008 and November 2014. Serial assessment of renal function, was performed at baseline and at day 1, day 7, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after implantation. Effects of 1-month GFR and changes in GFR from baseline to 1 month on long-term mortality and hospital re-admission were evaluated. There were 30 patients with GFR <45 (low), 44 with GFR 45 to 59 (intermediate), and 110 with GFR ≥60 (normal) at baseline. Only patients with baseline GFR <45 experienced significant improvement in GFR after 2 years of follow-up (p = 0.012). At 1 month, a higher GFR category was significantly associated with a 31% reduction in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, CI 0.49 to 0.98, p = 0.036), but not re-admission. Patients with baseline low and intermediate GFR who had no improvement in renal function category at 1 month experienced significantly greater risk of mortality (HR 1.95, CI 1.10 to 3.43, p = 0.022) and re-admission (HR 1.75, CI 1.07 to 2.84, p = 0.025), relative to patients whose GFR was normal at baseline and 1 month. In conclusion, renal function after LVAD implantation improves in patients with GFR <45. Change in renal function from baseline to 1 month after implantation is a powerful marker of long-term outcomes.

Depression and anxiety in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are associated with a worse prognosis in heart failure patients. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of depression and anxiety in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidates and assess their effect on post-LVAD outcomes.

METHODS

Based on the pre-LVAD psychological assessment, the total cohort of 246 patients were divided into 4 groups: 1) no depression or anxiety (NDep&Anx group, n = 138); 2) isolated depression (Dep group, n = 42); 3) isolated anxiety (Anx group, n = 32), and 4) combined depression and anxiety (Dep&Anx group, n = 34).

RESULTS

The Dep&Anx group was associated with higher prevalence of female gender (p = 0.03), higher body mass index (p = 0.03), elevated E/E' (p = 0.003), and increased Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) XI score (p = 0.04) prior to LVAD as compared to the other 3 subgroups. The prevalence of other major psychiatric disorders (p = 0.03) and narcotic dependence (p = 0.004) was higher in the Dep&Anx group. Post-LVAD implantation, heart rate and filling pressures were elevated and readmission rate was higher (p = 0.001) in the Dep&Anx group. There was no difference in survival between the groups (p = 0.40, Log-Rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-existing anxiety and depression was associated with worse HF pre- and post-LVAD implantation and higher readmissions rate after LVAD implantation.