Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Case Series

HeartMate 3 for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: In Vitro Hemodynamic Evaluation and Anatomical Fitting

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes approximately 50% of heart failure (HF) cases, and encompasses different phenotypes. Among these, most patients with HFpEF exhibit structural heart changes, often with smaller left ventricular cavities, which pose challenges for utilizing ventricular assist devices (VADs). A left atrial to aortic (LA-Ao) VAD configuration could address these challenges, potentially enhancing patient quality of life by lowering elevated mean left atrial pressure (MLAP). This study assessed the anatomical compatibility and left atrial unloading capacity using a simulated VAD-supported HFpEF patient. A HeartMate3-supported HFpEF patient in an LA-Ao configuration was simulated using a cardiovascular simulator. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded during rest and exercise at seven pump flow rates. Computed tomography scans of 14 HFpEF (NYHA II-III) and six heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients were analysed for anatomical comparisons. HFpEF models were independently assessed for virtual anatomical fit with the HM3 in the LA-Ao configuration. Baseline MLAP was reduced from 15 to 11 mmHg with the addition of 1 L/min HM3 support in the rest condition. In an exercise simulation, 6 L/min of HM3 support was required to reduce the MLAP from 29 to 16 mmHg. The HM3 successfully accommodated six HFpEF patients without causing interference with other cardiac structures, whereas it caused impingement ranging from 4 to 14 mm in the remaining patients. This study demonstrated that the HM3 in an LA-Ao configuration may be suitable for unloading the left atrium and relieving pulmonary congestion in some HFpEF patients where size-related limitations can be addressed through pre-surgical anatomical fit analysis.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

Advanced Heart Failure Therapies for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: State-of-the-Art Review and an Updated Analysis From UNOS

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is most commonly associated with obstructive symptoms and sudden cardiac death; however, predominantly nonobstructive advanced heart failure in HCM, marked by medically refractory disease with severe functional impairment, occurs in 5% to 7% of patients with HCM. The diagnosis relies on the integration of imaging (echocardiography/cardiac magnetic resonance), hemodynamic data, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to identify the patients who will benefit from advanced heart failure therapies. Most advanced heart failure therapies focus on systolic dysfunction and are not always applicable to this patient population. Left ventricular assist devices may be an option in a highly selected population with left ventricular dilation. Heart transplantation is often the best option for patients with advanced heart failure in HCM with excellent post-transplantation survival.

The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support in de novo heart failure syndromes with cardiogenic shock: A contemporary review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical syndrome with a high mortality rate. It can occur to due to multiple etiologies of cardiovascular disease and is phenotypically heterogeneous. Acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS) has historically been the most prevalent cause, and thus, research and guidance have focused primarily on this. Recent data suggest that the burden of non-ischemic CS is increasing in the population of patents requiring intensive care admission. There is, however, a paucity of data and guidelines to inform the management of these patients who fall into two broad groups: those with existing heart failure and CS and those with no known history of heart failure who present with "de novo" CS. The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has expanded across all etiologies, despite its high cost, resource intensity, complication rates, and lack of high-quality outcome data. Herein, we discuss the currently available evidence on the role of MCS in the management of patients with de novo CS to include fulminant myocarditis, right ventricular (RV) failure, Takotsubo syndrome, post-partum cardiomyopathy, and CS due to valve lesions and other cardiomyopathies.

Theoretical considerations for a left atrial pump in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogenous group of disorders, unified by findings of elevated left atrial and left ventricular filling pressures in the setting of normal systolic function. Medical therapies for HFpEF patients are markedly limited, and these patients are often unable to tolerate conventional left ventricular assist device therapies because of small chamber size. The Synergy System (CircuLite, Inc., Saddle Brook, NJ) was a micropump-based form of mechanical circulatory support in which flow derived from the left atrium was delivered to the subclavian artery. In this review, we discuss the potential role of the Synergy left atrial pump to address the hemodynamic derangements of HFpEF.

A Multi-Domain Simulation Study of a Pulsatile-Flow Pump Device for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are currently under development to improve the physiology and hemodynamics of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Most of these devices, however, are designed to provide continuous-flow support. While it has been shown that pulsatile support may overcome some of the complications hindering the clinical translation of these devices for other heart failure phenotypes, the effects that it may have on the HFpEF physiology are still unknown. Here, we present a multi-domain simulation study of a pulsatile pump device with left atrial cannulation for HFpEF that aims to alleviate left atrial pressure, commonly elevated in HFpEF. We leverage lumped-parameter modeling to optimize the design of the pulsatile pump, computational fluid dynamic simulations to characterize hydraulic and hemolytic performance, and finite element modeling on the Living Heart Model to evaluate effects on arterial, left atrial, and left ventricular hemodynamics and biomechanics. The findings reported in this study suggest that pulsatile-flow support can successfully reduce pressures and associated wall stresses in the left heart, while yielding more physiologic arterial hemodynamics compared to continuous-flow support. This work therefore supports further development and evaluation of pulsatile support MCS devices for HFpEF.

Prognostic implications of different clinical profiles in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a myocardial genetic disease relatively common in the general population with heterogenous clinical presentation, natural history and prognosis. About 60% of HCM patients have a stable clinical course, while others may experience a variety of HCMrelated complications which follows relatively independent pathways, and that can be distinguished in different subgroups. These subgroups are represented by patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; patients with end-stage disease and reduced or preserved systolic function; patients with apical hypertrophy; patients with apical aneurysm; patients with atrial fibrillation, patients at high risk of sudden death and patients with pre-clinical HCM. The purpose of this review is to describe each of these clinical profiles with its prognostic implications.

Device-Based Solutions to Improve Cardiac Physiology and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Characterized by a rapidly increasing prevalence, elevated mortality and rehospitalization rates, and inadequacy of pharmaceutical therapies, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has motivated the widespread development of device-based solutions. HFpEF is a multifactorial disease of various etiologies and phenotypes, distinguished by diminished ventricular compliance, diastolic dysfunction, and symptoms of heart failure despite a normal ejection performance; these symptoms include pulmonary hypertension, limited cardiac reserve, autonomic imbalance, and exercise intolerance. Several types of atrial shunts, left ventricular expanders, stimulation-based therapies, and mechanical circulatory support devices are currently under development aiming to target one or more of these symptoms by addressing the associated mechanical or hemodynamic hallmarks. Although the majority of these solutions have shown promising results in clinical or preclinical studies, no device-based therapy has yet been approved for the treatment of patients with HFpEF. The purpose of this review is to discuss the rationale behind each of these devices and the findings from the initial testing phases, as well as the limitations and challenges associated with their clinical translation.

Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome with an unfavorable prognosis, and the number of the patients continues to grow. Because there is no effective therapy established as a standard, including pharmacological treatments, a movement to develop and evaluate device-based therapies is an important emerging area in the treatment of HFpEF patients. Many devices have set their target to reduce the left atrial pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure because they are strongly related to the symptoms and prognosis of HFpEF, but the methodology to achieve it varies based on the devices. In this review, we summarize and categorize these devices into the following: (1) interatrial shunt devices, (2) left ventricle expander, (3) electrical therapy, (4) left ventricular assist devices, and (5) mechanical circulatory support devices under development. Here, we describe the features and specifications of device-based therapies currently under development and those at more advanced stages of preclinical testing. Advantages and limitations of these technologies, with insights on their safety and feasibility for HFpEF patients, are described.

"Compassionate" Cases of the Jarvik 2015 Ventricular Assist Device

The Jarvik 2015 Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) (Jarvik Inc, New York, NY) is the first and currently only continuous-flow VAD specifically designed for small children, and it is being evaluated in the so-called Pump for Kids, Infants, and Neonates (PumpKIN) trial. Due to the strict inclusion criteria of the trial, there have been a group of patients who failed to meet the criteria and therefore received the Jarvik 2015 VAD under the designation of "compassionate use." This is the same phenomenon seen previously during the Berlin Heart EXCOR trial. While we await the results of the PumpKIN trial, which will report the device performance in a strictly selected population, the compassionate use cases represent actual "real world" experiences. We describe herein our experience of two compassionate use cases. In particular, this report has a special emphasis on the power consumption and hemolysis and inflammatory lab profile of the Jarvik 2015 VAD as hemocompatibility was the primary focus of the developmental and the preclinical phases.

2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases.

STRUCTURE

Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Aim This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Structure Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.

Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Utilization and Heart Transplant Waitlist Outcomes in Patients With Restrictive and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) generally are considered poor candidates for mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs) and often not able to be bridged mechanically to heart transplantation. This study characterized MCSD utilization and transplant waitlist outcomes in patients with RCM/HCM under the current allocation system and discusses changes in the era of the new donor allocation system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients waitlisted from 2006 to 2016 in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry were stratified by RCM/HCM versus other diagnoses. MCSD utilization and waitlist duration were analyzed by propensity score models. Waitlist outcomes were assessed by cumulative incidence functions with competing events. Predictors of waitlist mortality or delisting for worsening status in patients with RCM/HCM were identified by proportional hazards model. Of 30 608 patients on the waitlist, 5.1% had RCM/HCM. Patients with RCM/HCM had 31 fewer waitlist days (P<0.01) and were ≈26% less likely to receive MCSD (P<0.01). Cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality was similar between cohorts; however, patients with RCM/HCM had higher incidence of heart transplantation. Predictors of waitlist mortality or delisting for worsening status in patients with RCM/HCM without MCSD support included estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m², pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >20 mm Hg, inotrope use, and subjective frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RCM/HCM are less likely to receive MCSD but have similar waitlist mortality and slightly higher incidence of transplantation compared with other patients. The United Network for Organ Sharing RCM/HCM risk model can help identify patients who are at high risk for clinical deterioration and in need of expedited heart transplantation.

A Valveless Pulsatile Pump for the Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Simulation Study

PURPOSE

Effective treatment of patients with terminal heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an unmet medical need. The aim of this study was to investigate a novel valveless pulsatile pump as a therapeutic option for the HFpEF population through comprehensive in silico investigations.

METHODS

The pump was simulated in a numerical model of the cardiovascular system of four HFpEF phenotypes and compared to a typical case of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The proposed pump, which was modeled as being directly connected to the left ventricle, features a single valveless inlet and outlet cannula and is driven in co-pulsation with the left ventricle. We collected hemodynamics for two different pump volumes (30 and 60 mL).

RESULTS

In all HFpEF conditions, the 30 mL pump improved the cardiac output by approximately 1 L/min, increased the mean arterial pressure by > 11% and lowered the mean left atrial pressure by > 30%. With the larger (60 mL) stroke volume, these hemodynamic improvements were more pronounced. In the HFrEF condition however, these effects were three times less in magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

In this simulation study, the valveless pulsatile device improves hemodynamics in HFpEF patients by increasing the total stroke volume. The hemodynamic benefits are achieved with a small device volume comparable to implantable rotary blood pumps.

Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Case Report and Literature Review

Patient: Female, 53

Final Diagnosis: Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Symptoms: Chest pain • dizziness • palpitations

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Cardiology

Left atrial decompression pump for severe heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: theoretical and clinical considerations

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to provide insight into the potential for left atrium (LA) to aortic mechanical circulatory support as a treatment for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

BACKGROUND

Although HFpEF arises from different etiologies, 1 hallmark of all forms of this syndrome is a small or minimally-dilated left ventricle (LV). Consequently, the use of traditional mechanical circulatory support in end-stage patients has been difficult. In contrast, HFpEF is also characterized by a large LA.

METHODS

Hemodynamic characteristics of 4 distinct HFpEF phenotypes were characterized from the published data: 1) hypertrophic cardiomyopathies; 2) infiltrative diseases; 3) nonhypertrophic HFpEF; and 4) HFpEF with common cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g., hypertension). Employing a previously-described cardiovascular simulation, the effects of a low-flow, micropump-based LA decompression device were modeled. The effect of sourcing blood from the LV versus the LA was compared.

RESULTS

For all HFpEF phenotypes, mechanical circulatory support significantly increased cardiac output, provided a mild increase in blood pressure, and markedly reduced pulmonary and LA pressures. LV sourcing of blood reduced LV end-systolic volume into a range likely to induce suction. With LA sourcing, however, LV end-systolic volume increased compared with baseline. Due to pre-existing LA enlargement, LA volumes remained sufficiently elevated, thus minimizing the risk of suction.

CONCLUSIONS

This theoretical analysis suggests that a strategy involving pumping blood from the LA to the arterial system may provide a viable option for end-stage HFpEF. Special considerations apply to each of the 4 types of HFpEF phenotypes described. Finally, an HFpEF-specific clinical profile scoring system (such as that of INTERMACS [Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support]) would aid in the selection of patients with the appropriate risk-benefit ratio for implantation of an active pump.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a review

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a global disease with cases reported in all continents, affecting people of both genders and of various racial and ethnic origins. Widely accepted as a monogenic disease caused by a mutation in 1 of 13 or more sarcomeric genes, HCM can present catastrophically with sudden cardiac death (SCD) or ventricular arrhythmias or insidiously with symptoms of heart failure. Given the velocity of progress in both the fields of heart failure and HCM, we present a review of the approach to patients with HCM, with particular attention to those with HCM and the clinical syndrome of heart failure.

Advanced Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function in Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background—

In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), heart transplant has been predominantly confined to patients with systolic dysfunction. An underappreciated HCM subset comprises patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function who may also require consideration for transplantation. Therefore, we sought to define the clinical profile and occurrence of advanced heart failure among patients with nonobstructive HCM and preserved systolic function.

Methods and Results—

Databases from 2 referral centers comprising 2100 HCM patients were interrogated. Forty-six nonobstructive HCM patients (2.2%) either received or were listed for heart transplant, including 20 with normal systolic function (ejection fraction ≥50%). At transplant listing, these 20 patients were 42±13 years old, each in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV with ejection fraction of 62±7%. LV was hypertrophied with maximum wall thickness of 22±4 mm and nondilated (end-diastolic dimension, 39±7 mm). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 10 (of 15) patients showed no or minimal fibrosis (≤5% LV mass). Elevated LV end-diastolic or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, consistent with diastolic dysfunction, was present in 15 patients (75%). LV filling was impaired by echocardiographic measures in all patients, including a restrictive inflow pattern in 8 (40%). In 2 patients, traditional criteria for transplant were absent, including peak V O 2 >14 mL/kg/min. Heart transplantation was performed in 12 patients with each alive and without cardiovascular symptoms, 2.3±1.7 years later.

Conclusions—

A previously under-recognized segment of the broad HCM clinical spectrum consists of nonobstructive patients with advanced heart failure, in the presence of preserved systolic function, for whom heart transplant is the sole definitive therapeutic option.