Nutrition in burn injury: any recent changes?

Pediatric Burns: From Acute Care Through Reconstruction in 2024

Children are disproportionately affected by burn injuries. Differences between adult and pediatric burns range from epidemiologic characteristics to pathophysiological considerations, which vary between different age subgroups. All these factors must be considered in each phase of burn care. This article reviews the most important aspects of the management of a pediatric burned patient starting from the acute through reconstructive phases.

Determination of energy requirements after minor burns using indirect calorimetry: A descriptive cohort study

BACKGROUND

Minor burns could be associated with moderate hypermetabolism. In this study, the primary outcome was measured energy expenditure (mEE) determined by indirect calorimetry in patients with minor burns. We also compared mEE with predictive values and actual energy intakes.

METHODS

Adults with minor burns exclusively treated on an outpatient basis were included. During the week following injury, a dietitian performed indirect calorimetry (Q-NRG in canopy mode), calculated the estimated energy expenditure (eEE) based on the Harris-Benedict (HB) and Henry formulas, and evaluated daily energy intakes using a food anamnesis.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (59.2% male; median age: 35 [interquartile range: 29-46.5] years; body mass index [BMI]: 26.2 [22.3-29.6] kg/m2; burn surface area [BSA]: 1.5% [1%-2%]) were included 4 (2-6) days after injury. The mEE was 1863 (1568-2199) kcal or 25 (22.4-28.5) kcal/kg and 1838 (1686-2026) kcal or 26.1 (23.7-27.7) kcal/kg in patients who were respectively fasting for >10 h or not (P = 0.991 or P = 0.805). The total mEE was 104% (95%-116%) and 108% (99%-122%) of the total eEE using the HB and Henry formulas, respectively, with diet-induced thermogenesis and physical activity level. Hypermetabolism (ie, oxygen consumption at rest ≥3.5 ml/kg/min) was observed in 21/49 (42.9%) patients. Energy intakes corresponded to 71% (60%-86%) of the total mEE.

CONCLUSION

Performing indirect calorimetry in adults with minor burns revealed that ≥40% of the tested adults presented a hypermetabolism and that their mEE was not covered by their energy intakes.

Use of the Braden Scale to Predict Injury Severity in Mass Burn Casualties

Background

Mass burn casualties impose an enormous burden on triage systems. The triage capacity of the Braden Scale for detecting injury severity has not been evaluated in mass burn casualties.

Material/Methods

The New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was used to dichotomize the injury severity of patients. The Braden Scale and other potentially indicative measurement tools were evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. The relationships between the Braden Scale and other continuous variables with injury severity were further explored by correlation analysis and fitted with regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to validate triage capacity and compare prognostic accuracy.

Results

A total of 160 hospitalized patients were included in our study; 37 were severely injured, and 123 were not. Injury severity was independently associated with the Numerical Rating Scale (adjusted OR, 1.816; 95% CI, 1.035–3.187) and Braden Scale (adjusted OR, 0.693; 95% CI, 0.564–0.851). The ROC curve of the fitted quadratic model of the Braden Scale was 0.896 (0.840–0.953), and the cut-off value was 17. The sensitivity was 81.08% (64.29–91.44%) and the specificity was 82.93% (74.85–88.89%). Comparison of ROC curves demonstrated an infinitesimal difference between the Braden Scale and NISS for predicting 30-day hospital discharge (Z=0.291, P=0.771) and Intensive Care Unit admission (Z=2.016, P=0.044).

Conclusions

The Braden Scale is a suitable triage tool for predicting injury severity and forecasting disability-related outcomes in patients affected by mass burn casualty incidents.

Glutamine relieves the hypermetabolic response and reduces organ damage in severe burn patients: A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Severe burns can cause a hypermetabolic response and organ damage. Glutamine is a conditionally essential amino acid with various pharmacological effects. In this study, whether glutamine could alleviate the hypermetabolic response and maintain organ function after burn injury was analyzed.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of glutamine in decreasing hypermetabolism after burn injury. Physiological and biochemical indexes, such as vital signs, metabolic hormones, metabolic rate, and organ damage, were recorded on the 7th and 14th days after treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 55 adult burn patients with a total burn surface area (TBSA) of 30-70% were included in this study and randomly divided into the burn control (B, 28 patients) and burn+glutamine (B+G, 27 patients) groups. Except for the glutamine administration, the groups did not differ in the other treatments and nutrition supplements. The levels of diamine oxidase (DAO), lactulose/mannitol (L/M), β₂-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBD) and cardiac troponin l (cTnl) in the B+G group were significantly lower than those in the B group (p < 0.05 or 0.01). The levels of resting energy expenditure (REE), serum catecholamines, glucagon, lactate and Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) in the B+G group were significantly lower than those in the B group (p < 0.05 or 0.01). No significant difference was found in the length of hospitalization or the mortality rate between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Glutamine moderately alleviates the hypermetabolic response and reduces organ damage after severe burns. Therefore, the early application of glutamine, which is effective and safe, should be used as an active intervention as early as possible.

Exudative glutamine losses contribute to high needs after burn injury

Background

Burnpatients characteristically have increased energy, glucose, and protein requirements. Glutamine supplementation is strongly recommended during early‐phase treatment and is associated with improved immunity, wound healing, and reduced mortality. This study evaluated if early burn exudative losses might contribute to higher supplementation needs.

Methods

Patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit (ICU) had exudate collection from tight bandages applied to arms or legs during the first week (exudate aliquot twice daily). Seven amino acids (alanine, arginine, cystEine, glutamine, leucine, lysine, and methionine) were quantified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Descriptive analysis of all results is provided as median and interquartile range or in value ranges.

Results

Eleven patients aged 19–77 years, presenting with burns on 18%–70% of the body surface, with a median simplified acute physiology score II of 33 (range, 16–56) were included during the study period. The highest amino acid losses were observed during the first 3 days with an important interpatient and intrapatient variability. Glutamine and alanine losses were highest, followed by leucine and lysine in all patients; amino acid exudate concentrations were in the range of normal plasma concentrations and were stable over time. Total glutamine losses were correlated to the burned surface (r² = 0.552, P = .012), but not to enteral glutamine supplements.

Conclusions

The study shows significant exudative losses during early‐stage burn recovery and particularly for glutamine and alanine. Glutamine loss generally decreased with wound closure, the subsequent decline of exudation, and the evolving size of burn surfaces.

Predictive Value of the Prognostic Nutrition Index for the Prognosis of Patients With Severe Burns Treated With the Meek Graft

The Meek technique is currently a key method for treating wounds in severely burned patients. The survival rate of skin grafts is an important factor affecting the success rate of treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on the survival rate of skin grafts in patients treated with the Meek technique in the early stage of severe burns. We retrospectively analyzed the data of severely burned patients who were treated at the burn center between January 2013 and December 2019 and met the inclusion criteria. The albumin (ALB) level and lymphocyte count obtained 1 day before the operation was used to calculate the preoperative PNI (PNI = serum ALB level [g/L] + 5 × total number of peripheral blood lymphocytes [×109/L]). According to the survival rates of skin grafts 14 days after the operation, patients with severe burns were divided into a group with good skin graft survival (survival rate ≥75%, abbreviated as group G) and a group with poor skin graft survival (survival rate <75%, abbreviated as group P). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative PNI for the prognosis of patients treated with the Meek technique. One hundred and twenty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Groups G (n = 66 cases) and P (n = 55 cases) did not have significant differences in age, sex, and body mass index (P > .05). The total burned surface area, burn index, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, preoperative platelet count, operative time, total protein, albumin level, globulin level, and PNI were the risk factors affecting the survival of Meek grafts. The burn index was an independent risk factor for poor skin graft survival (odds ratio [OR]: 1.049, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.020-1.079; P < .05). The preoperative PNI was a protective factor against poor skin graft survival (OR: 0.646, 95% CI: 0.547-0.761; P < .05). The ROC curve determined that the optimal cut-off value for the preoperative PNI was 34.98. There were 59 cases with PNI > 34.98 (the high PNI group) and 62 cases with PNI < 34.98 (the low PNI group). The survival rate of skin grafts in patients with a high PNI was generally significantly higher than that of patients with a low preoperative PNI (P < .05). Five (8.47%) patients in the high PNI group died, compared with 16 (25.8%) patients in the low PNI group. The difference in the mortality rate between the two groups was significant (P < .05). Preoperative PNI can be used as a predictor of the survival rate of skin grafts in patients treated with the Meek technique in the early stage of severe burns.

A Retrospective Study of Factors Influencing the Survival of Modified Meek Micrografting in Severe Burn Patients

Modified Meek micrografting is a common method for treating severe burn patients. This study was to analyze the factors affecting the survival of modified Meek micrografting, thereby improving the survival rate of skin grafts. Eighty-three patients who underwent modified Meek micrografting were analyzed. According to the survival rate of skin graft after operation, the patients were divided into good skin survival group (GSSG, survival rate ≥ 70%, 47 cases) and poor skin survival group (PSSG, survival rate < 70%, 36 cases). The baseline data, surgical information, perioperative laboratory indicators, and prognosis of the patients were statistically analyzed. The univariate analysis and repeated measurement showed the burn severity, Meek skin graft area, duration of anesthesia, the postoperative sepsis shock, the mortality, the neutrophils percentage on the third day after surgery (NEU3), and the growth rate of neutrophils percentage from the first to third day after surgery (NEU3-1%) in the GSSG were significantly lower than those in the PSSG, whereas the perioperative average albumin levels and the perioperative average pre-albumin levels were higher. Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the NEU3 had a good predictive value for the survival of skin slices. Maintaining perioperative albumin levels at a high level, controlling perioperative infection, and shortening the operation time as much as possible may improve the survival rate of modified Meek micrografting.

Bioelements in the treatment of burn injuries - The complex review of metabolism and supplementation (copper, selenium, zinc, iron, manganese, chromium and magnesium)

Appropriate nutrition is a key component of burn treatment and should be regarded as an integral part of the therapeutic process in burn patients. A nutritional intervention plan should not only allow for adequate quantities of energy and protein but also carefully consider the supply of macro- and micronutrients. As a result of the severe inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and hypermetabolic state, accompanied by often extensive exudation in burn patients, there is a considerable loss of macro- and micronutrients, including essential trace elements. This leads to certain complications, involving e.g. more frequent infections and impaired wound healing. Our current body of knowledge is still insufficient, and the studies carried out to date focus for the most part on the imbalances in trace elements, such as copper (Cu), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn). Nevertheless, there are many other trace elements involved in immune functions, regulating gene expression or antioxidant defense, and many of those have not been properly investigated in a clinical setting. Due to the insufficient amount of unambiguous literature data and relatively few, often dated, studies carried out with small patient groups, further evaluation of macro- and microelements in burn patients seems indispensable, e.g. to bring up to date local nutritional protocols.

Nutrition problems in a severe burn patient with schizophrenia: a case report

Hypermetabolic conditions with nutrition deficiencies are common in patients with extensive burns. Balanced nutrition status is required to achieve adequate wound healing. Mental disorder, which tended to make a patient uncooperative, complicates the management. We report the case of a 35-year-old man with schizophrenia who suffered full- and partial-thickness burns in approximately 38% of total body surface area due to attempted suicide. The patient was hospitalized for 66 days and underwent multiple surgeries. His body mass index (BMI) was continuously low. Tissue injuries provoked inflammatory responses that contributed to metabolic disarrangement, meanwhile the presence of psychiatric disorder complicated the means of nutrition assessment and therapy needed to compensate for the high nutrition demand during the treatment period. Nutrition support should be assessed and adjusted continuously.

Effectiveness and mechanism study of glutamine on alleviating hypermetabolism in burned rats

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the effects of glutamine on hypermetabolic reactions in burned rats and its underlying mechanism.

METHODS

Fifty-five Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups, namely, the control (C), burned (B), and burned + glutamine (B + G) groups. Rats in the glutamine treatment group were supplemented with 1 g glutamine per kg body weight. Changes in body weight and resting energy expenditure in all groups were observed daily. Blood glucose and glucose tolerance level were measured on days 1, 3, 7, 10 and 14 after burn injury. On days 7 and 14 after injury, the rats were sacrificed, and the weight and protein content of the skeletal muscle were measured. Moreover, the level of glutamine, inflammatory mediator, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), glutathione, and the activity of glutamine metabolic enzymes were measured.

RESULTS

The hypermetabolic reaction after burn injury was significantly inhibited by glutamine administration, and the range of variations in the resting energy expenditure and body weight indicators was narrowed remarkably (P < 0.05 or 0.01), whereas the weight and protein content of the skeletal muscle returned to normal (P < 0.05 or 0.01). Glutamine could increase glutaminase activity in various tissues, promote the utilization of glutamine, and appropriately reduce the degree of organ damage and inflammatory response (P < 0.05 or 0.01). Furthermore, glutamine could promote the synthesis of the reducing substances NADPH and glutathione (P < 0.05 or 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Glutamine administration effectively reduces hypermetabolic reactions by promoting NADPH synthesis, inhibiting oxidative stress, and improving glutamine utilization after burn injury.

Immunological approaches and therapy in burns (Review)

Burns have become an important public health problem in the last two decades, with just over a quarter of a million deaths annually. Major burns are accompanied by a strong inflammatory response, which will most often lead to systemic response inflammatory syndrome, followed by sepsis and finally induce multiple organ failure. The main mechanism involved in wound healing after burns is the inflammatory process, characterized by the recruitment of myeloid and T cells and by the involvement of numerous cytokines, chemokines, complement fractions, as well as various growth factors. Inflammasomes, protein-based cytosolic complexes, activated during metabolic stress or infection, play a role in modulating and improving the defense capacity of the innate immune system. Nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has been studied predominantly and several hypotheses have been issued. Restoring the balance between the pro-inflammatory response and the anti-inflammatory activity is the key element to effective therapy in burns. Severe burns require nutritional support and pharmacotherapy not only for burn area but for different pathological complications of burn injury. In-depth research is required to find new ways to modulate the defense capacity, to prevent the complications of abnormal immune response and to treat burn injuries efficiently.

The glutamine debate in surgery and critical care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glutamine (GLN) is a versatile amino acid, long believed to have important implications in ICU and surgical patients. An extensive body of data examining GLN supplementation of TPN demonstrated a consistent signal of improved outcomes. However, recently signals of risk have come from two large-scale multicenter trials evaluating GLN (and other nutrients) at high dose and as primary pharmaconutrients, not as supplementation to complete nutrition. These trials indicate a risk of increased mortality when GLN is given to patients in shock, renal failure, and early in acute phase of critical care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature continues to confirm that low and high admission GLN levels are associated with increased ICU mortality and adverse outcomes. Further, a recent meta-analysis examined trials utilizing GLN-supplemented TPN in stabile ICU patients consistent with current clinical guidelines. This analysis showed GLN supplementation of TPN led to reduced infections, LOS and hospital mortality.

SUMMARY

Three recent meta-analyses have confirmed traditional GLN-supplemented (or 'GLN-Complemented' - providing GLN for completeness of amino acid content) TPN is safe, reduces mortality and improves outcome in surgical and ICU patients. Patients in need of TPN, burns, trauma or malignancies should continue to benefit from supplemental GLN, administered either intravenously at less than 0.35 g/kg/day or enterally at less than 0.5 g/kg/day. Further, a large trial of EN GLN supplementation in burns is ongoing. Thus, when used per guideline recommendations, the GLN story is likely still relevant to ICU outcomes and research.

[Nutritional aspects of the management of the severely burned patient]

The nutrition of the severely burned patient is one of the pillars of his or her care, from the first few hours after the accident to rehabilitation. When properly conducted, there is a recognized beneficial effect on morbidity and even mortality.

Interrupted Nutrition Support in Patients With Burn Injuries: A Single-Centre Observational Study

Background

Enteral nutrition (EN) is essential to meet the increased metabolic requirements of burn-injured patients. However, feeds are often suspended for care. This study examines the interruptions in EN (IEN).

Objective

To determine the frequency and duration of IEN and whether these interruptions are predictable or unpredictable.

Design

This retrospective chart review of 27 adult burn patients examined age, sex, body mass index, percentage of total body surface area, length of hospital stay, predicted energy requirements from equations and indirect calorimetry, EN start time, time EN reached goal rate, and interruptions to EN.

Results

Predictable interruptions accounted for 74.5% (frequency) and 81.6% (duration) of total interruptions. The most frequent and time-consuming interruptions were perioperative period, extubation, and tests/procedures (predictable) versus high gastric residual volume, emesis/nausea, and feeding tube displacement (unpredictable).

Conclusions

Most IEN were due to predictable events. Based on these findings, compensating for predictable interruptions to meet nutritional requirements in burn patients is recommended.

Nutrition: reducing the hypermetabolic response to thermal injury

Nutritional support is seen as a vital component in the battle to attenuate the extreme hypermetabolic response experienced by patients suffering from large thermal injuries. Protein catabolism precipitating protein malnutrition places patients at greater risk of wound infection and sepsis due to delayed wound healing. Underfeeding, aggressive feeding, feeding routes, timing of initiation of feeding and tight insulin control have all been explored extensively in the quest to understand what nutritional treatment will best attenuate the hypermetabolic response. Despite this it is suggested that the majority of patients with large thermal injuries do not receive adequate nutritional support immediately post injury. Nurses have a pivotal role to play in ensuring that thermal injury patients receive appropriate nutritional support based on the best available evidence.

Glutamine in Burn Injury

Burn injury is the most devastating of survivable injuries and is a worldwide public health crisis. Burn injury is among the most severe metabolic stresses a patient can sustain. A major burn leads to an inflammatory response and catabolism that, when compounded by burn wound nutrient losses, can lead to severe nutrition losses and deficiencies. These losses can impair immune function and wound healing and place burn patients at high risk for organ injury and mortality. Experimental data indicate glutamine (GLN) is well positioned mechanistically, perhaps above and beyond in any other intensive care unit setting, to improve outcome in burn-injured patients. Initial clinical trial data have also shown a consistent signal of reduced mortality and reduced hospital length of stay in burn-injured subjects, without signals of clinical risk. A number of GLN clinical trials demonstrate significant reductions of gram-negative bacteremia in burn injury, perhaps via maintenance of the gut barrier or gut immune function. Current societal recommendations continue to suggest the use of GLN in burn injury. The promising clinical data in burn-injured patients, with no signals of harm, have warranted study of GLN in the definitive RE-ENERGIZE trial, which is now ongoing.

Clinical significance of nutritional risk screening tool for hospitalised children with acute burn injuries: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the nutritional risks among children hospitalised with acute burn injuries and their associated clinical outcomes using three nutritional risk screening (NRS) tools: Screening Tool for Risk of Impaired Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONG_KIDS ), Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) and Screening Tool for the Assessment for Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP).

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2015 to November 2016, in a regional burn centre. Patients were screened by two independent observers, using the three NRS tools.

RESULTS

A total of 100 children aged 3 months to 16.5 years were included. STRONG_KIDS identified 16% of patients as having high risk, with being identified 45% by PYMS and 44% by STAMP. After adjustment for confounding factors in multivariate regression analysis, patients in the high-risk group had significantly longer median (SD) lengths of stay [medium versus high risk: STRONG_KIDS , 9.5 (6.6) versus 15.0 (24.2) days; PYMS, 8.5 (4.4) versus 13.0 (16.1) days; STAMP, 9.0 (5.7) versus 11.0 (17.4) days] and greater median (SD) weight loss [medium versus high risk: STRONG_KIDS, 0.15 (0.8) versus -0.35 (0.8) kg; STAMP, 0.5 (0.7) versus 0 (0.1) kg] than patients in the medium-risk group (P < 0.05). The strengths of agreement in the nutritional risk classification between the two observers were good (κ for STRONG_KIDS = 0.61; PYMS = 0.79; STAMP = 0.75) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The STRONG_KIDS , PYMS and STAMP tools could be useful and practical for determining which hospitalised children with acute burn injuries will need additional nutritional intervention.

Gut microbiota trajectory in patients with severe burn: A time series study

PURPOSE

This time series experiments aimed to investigate the dynamic change of gut microbiomes after severe burn and its association with enteral nutrition (EN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven severely burned patients who suffered from a severe metal dust explosion injury were recruited in this study. The dynamic changes of gut microbiome of fecal samples at six time points (1-3days, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6weeks after severe burn) were detected using 16S ribosomal RNA pyrosequencing technology.

RESULTS

Following the post-burn temporal order, gut microbiota dysbiosis was detected in the gut microbiome after severe burn, then it was gradually resolved. The bio-diversity of gut bacteria was initially decreased, and then returned to normal level. In addition, at the early stage (from 2 to 4weeks), the majority of those patients' gut microbiome were opportunistic pathogen genus, Enterococcus and Escherichia; while at the end of this study, the majority was a beneficial genus, Bacteroides. EN can promote the recovery of gut microbiota, especially in EN well-tolerated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe burn injury can cause a dramatic dysbiosis of gut microbiota. A trend of enriched beneficial bacteria and diminished opportunistic pathogen bacteria may serve as prognosis microbiome biomarkers of severe burn patients.