Relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis: prevalence, characteristics, and associated clinical findings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 106 patients

Investigating interferon type I responses in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are closely related inflammatory disorders. Easily measurable biomarkers defining active disease and identifying patients in need of glucocorticoid sparing treatment options are highly desired. Interferon Type I (IFN-I) might be involved in disease pathology; however, evidence is limited. This study explores a systemic IFN-I signature and expression of IFN-I markers in GCA and PMR patients. Treatment naive GCA and PMR patients, and PMR patients with glucocorticoid treatment were included. Patients suspected of but not diagnosed with GCA were used as controls. Five relevant IFN-I-stimulated genes were identified in literature, and relative expression levels were determined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. An IFN-I score was generated. Serum levels of IFN-I induced C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) and Galectin-9 were determined by multiplex immunoassay. There were no differences in IFN-I scores between the groups. An IFN-I signature was observed in 0/9 controls, 2/11 GCA patients, 4/20 treatment naive PMR patients, and 2/10 PMR patients with treatment. Serum CXCL10 and Galectin-9 were not increased in GCA or PMR patients compared to control patients. Treated PMR patients had lower CXCL10 levels [423.2 pg/ml (375.1-491.1)] compared to treatment naive PMR patients [641.8 pg/ml (552.8-830.6)]. An IFN-I signature does not distinguish GCA and PMR patients from controls. Also, IFN-I-induced serum markers are not upregulated in GCA and PMR patients. Easily measurable IFN-I-induced serum markers will therefore probably not aid in diagnosis and additional treatment options in newly diagnosed GCA and PMR patients.

Limb arteries involvement assessed by FDG/PET CT at diagnosis of giant cell arteritis and risk of relapse: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

Steroids and anti-IL6 biotherapy are highly effective in obtaining remission in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) but the risk of relapses remains high. We aimed to identify predictors of relapse in GCA.

METHODS

All consecutive patients admitted with a new diagnosis of GCA - according to the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria - between May 2011 and May 2022 were eligible for this study. The primary outcome was the GCA relapse rate over the 36-months follow up. Factors associated with the primary outcome and time to first relapse were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients (74 [69-81] years, 64.8% women) with a new diagnosis of GCA were studied. GCA was biopsy-proven in 65 (60.2%) cases. Ninety-eight (90.7%) FDG/PET CT scans performed at diagnosis were available for review. All patients received steroids given for 21.0 [18.0-28.5] months, associated with methotrexate (n=1, 0.9%) or tocilizumab (n=2, 1.9%). During a median follow-up of 27.5 [11.4-35.0] months, relapse occurred in 40 (37%) patients. Multivariable Cox regression model, including general signs, gender, aortic wall thickness, FDG uptake in arterial wall and IV steroid pulse as covariates, showed that both general signs (HR 2.0 [1.0-4.0, P<0.05) and FDG uptake in limb arteries (HR 2.7 [1.3-5.5], P<0.01) at diagnosis were associated with GCA relapse.

CONCLUSION

FDG uptake in limb arteries at diagnosis is a predictor of relapse in newly diagnosed GCA.

Clinical Manifestations and Prognosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical manifestations and survival of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

. A retrospective study included 166 patients with newly diagnosed GCA. Clinical, laboratory, and instrumental data and three sets of classification criteria were used to confirm the diagnosis: the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990, the revised ACR criteria of 2016 and/or the new ACR and European Alliance of Rheumatologic Associations (EULAR) 2022 criteria. Some of the patients underwent instrumental investigations: temporal artery ultrasound Doppler (n = 61), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (n = 5), CT angiography (n = 6), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 4), MR angiography (n = 3), and 18F-FDG PET/CT (n = 47). Overall and recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed using survival tables and Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

. The most frequent first manifestations of GCA were headache (81.8%), weakness (64%), fever (63.8%), and symptoms of rheumatic polymyalgia (56.6%). Changes in temporal arteries in color duplex scanning were detected in 44 out of 61 patients. GCs therapy was performed in all patients who agreed to be treated (n = 158), methotrexate was used in 49 out of 158 patients, leflunomide in 9 patients. In 45 (28.5%) out of 158 patients, a stable remission was achieved as a result of GC monotherapy; in 120 (75.9%) patients, long-term maintenance therapy with GCs was required to prevent exacerbations, including 71 (44.9%) patients in combination with methotrexate or other immunosuppressive drugs. The follow-up period of patients with a history of relapses was 21.0 (8.0-54.0) months. Relapses developed in 73 (46.2%) patients. The overall one-year survival rate was 97.1% [95% CI 94.3; 99.9], and the five-year survival rate of patients was 94.6% [95% CI 90.2; 99.0]. The one-year relapse-free survival rate was 86.4% [95% CI 80.5; 92.3], and the five-year relapse-free survival rate was 52.4% [95% CI 42.0; 62.8]. Twelve (7.2%) of 166 patients died. The cause of death was myocardial infarction in two patients, stroke in two patients, and breast cancer in one patient; in the remaining seven cases, the cause of death was not determined.

CONCLUSIONS

: Given the high frequency of disease exacerbation, patients with GCA require long-term follow-up, especially during the first year after diagnosis.

Vascular ultrasound as a follow-up tool in patients with giant cell arteritis: a prospective observational cohort study

Objectives

To evaluate relapses in giant cell arteritis (GCA), investigate the utility of vascular ultrasound to detect relapses, and develop and assess a composite score for GCA disease activity (GCAS) based on clinical symptoms, ultrasound imaging activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Methods

Patients with GCA were prospectively followed with scheduled visits, including assessment for clinical relapse, protocol ultrasound examination, and CRP. At each visit, patients were defined as having ultrasound remission or relapse. GCAS was calculated at every visit.

Results

The study included 132 patients, with a median follow-up time of 25 months [interquartile range (IR) 21]. The clinical relapse rate was 60.6%. There were no differences in relapse rates between GCA subtypes (cranial-GCA, large vessel (LV)-GCA, and mixed-GCA) (p = 0.83). Ultrasound yielded a sensitivity of 61.2% and a specificity of 72.3% for diagnosing GCA- relapse in our cohort. In 7.7% of follow-up visits with clinical relapses, neither high CRP nor findings of ultrasound relapse were registered. In comparison, in 10.3% of follow-up visits without symptoms of clinical relapse, there were both a high CRP and findings of ultrasound relapse.

Conclusion

We found moderate sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound as a monitoring tool for relapse in this prospective cohort of GCA patients. The extent or subtype of vasculitis at the diagnosis did not influence the number of relapses. Based on a combination of clinical symptoms, elevated CRP, and ultrasound findings, a composite score for GCA activity is proposed.

Current management of giant cell arteritis and its complications

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

This review provides an update on current management strategies for giant cell arteritis (GCA), emphasizing the need for alternative therapies to reduce disease relapses and mitigate glucocorticoid (GC)-related morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

The standard of care for GCA has traditionally involved prolonged use of GC, and recent studies are exploring faster GC tapering regimens in an effort to reduce adverse effects while maintaining disease control. Randomized clinical trials have highlighted the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, in reducing disease flares and sparing GCs. However, the optimal treatment duration with TCZ is unknown and patients remain at risk of relapse after treatment discontinuation. An unmet therapeutic need persists for patients who are not candidates for TCZ, and for those who have inadequate response to this biologic. Therefore, investigations into alternative therapies such as targeting interleukin-17A, blocking T-cell activation or inhibiting the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, showcase potential avenues for tailored treatments.

SUMMARY

While GCs remain the cornerstone of therapy, TCZ emerges as a promising GC-sparing agent. Ongoing research targeting different pathways implicated in GCA pathogenesis have led to encouraging results. However, the preliminary nature of these findings necessitates larger randomized controlled trials to establish their efficacy conclusively.

Relapses in giant cell arteritis: Updated review for clinical practice

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), the most common primary vasculitis in adults, is a granulomatous systemic vasculitis usually affecting the aorta and its major branches, particularly the carotid and vertebral arteries. Although remission can be achieved in most patients with GCA using high-dose glucocorticoids (GC), relapses are frequent, occurring in >40% of GC-only treated patients, mostly during the first two years after diagnosis. Relapsing courses lead to high GC exposure, increasing the risk of treatment-related adverse effects. Although tocilizumab is an efficacious GC-sparing therapy that allows increased sustained remission and reduced cumulative GC doses, relapses are common after drug discontinuation. This narrative review examines the most relevant features of relapses in GCA, including its definition, classification, frequency, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics, chronology, probable pathophysiology, and predictive factors. In addition, we discuss treatment options for relapsing patients and the effect of relapses on patient outcomes.

[Clinical characteristics and follow-up of 60 patients with recent diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, NEWTON study]

INTRODUCTION

The management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) has evolved with the arrival of tocilizumab (TCZ) and the use of PET/CT. Our objective is to describe the characteristics and followup of patients with recent diagnosis of GCA in current care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The NEWTON cohort is a monocentric retrospective cohort based on data collected from 60 GCA patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 according to the ACR/EULAR 2022 criteria.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 73 [68.75; 81] years old. At diagnosis, the main manifestations were unusual temporal headaches in 48 (80 %) and an inflammatory syndrome in 50 (83 %) patients. Temporal artery biopsy confirmed the diagnosis in 49/58 (84 %) patients. Doppler of the temporal arteries found a halo in 12/23 (52 %) patients. The PET/CT found hypermetabolism in 19/43 (44 %) patients. Prednisone was stopped in 17.5 [12.75; 24.25] months. During follow-up, 22 (37 %) patients received TCZ. At least one complication of corticosteroid therapy was observed in 22 (37 %) patients. After a median follow-up of 24 [12; 42] months, 25 (42 %) patients relapsed. At the end of the follow-up, 29 (48.3 %) patients were weaned from corticosteroid therapy and 15 (25 %) were on TCZ.

CONCLUSION

Despite the increasing use of TCZ in the therapeutic arsenal and of the PET/CT in the imaging tools of GCA patients, relapses and complications of corticosteroid therapy remain frequent, observed in more than a third of patients.

A Case of Large Vessel Giant Cell Arteritis Presenting With Cough and Diagnosed Using an FDG-PET Scan

Giant-cell arteritis (GCA) is a type of vasculitis characterised by the presence of granulomas. It is the predominant form of systemic vasculitis in adults and primarily affects the larger arteries in individuals aged ≥ 50 years. GCA affects the major arteries, such as the aorta and its branches, particularly the outer branches of the external carotid artery. Signs and symptoms can be categorised into cranial, extracranial, and systemic manifestations. Patients with headaches, jaw claudication, and vision disturbances usually have extracranial branches of the external carotid artery. Aside from being the prevailing manifestation of GCA, our primary concern regarding this variant is the potential for irreversible vision loss if not properly identified and addressed. Conversely, the GCA can also affect other major blood vessels such as the aorta. Here, we present the case of a 70-year-old Caucasian female patient with cranial GCA who had experienced a temporal headache three years prior. The patient was successfully treated with prednisolone, which was gradually reduced to a very low level with the assistance of methotrexate. Recently, the patient presented with a dry cough that lasted for two months and elevated inflammatory markers. After thorough research, it was determined that there was no evidence of infection, including atypical infections, and that no abnormalities were found in the lungs. Ultimately, via an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan, the patient was diagnosed with large vessel giant cell arteritis (LV-GCA). This impacted the aorta, carotid arteries, and subclavian arteries. The patient experienced notable improvement in her cough and a reduction in inflammatory markers after receiving a high dosage of oral prednisolone. This case exemplifies the unusual manifestation of LV-GCA and verifies that recurring symptoms may differ from the original presentation. While dry cough is not commonly listed as a symptom of LV-GCA, it can be present as a manifestation or the sole presentation in certain patients, particularly when inflammatory markers are consistently high and there is no pulmonary disease.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Giant-Cell Arteritis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Giant-cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common type of vasculitis in the elderly and is associated with high risks of visual loss and recurrence. Owing to its rarity in Asian populations, the current clinical interventions for these patients are not well known. Here we aimed to characterize the current management status of patients with GCA using Korean multicenter data.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients with GCA at six Korean university hospitals from February 2009 to November 2022. GCA had originally been diagnosed based on the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and cases were selected for inclusion in this study based on the 2022 ACR/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria. We evaluated treatments, follow-up periods, and outcomes (relapse, remission, and adverse drug reactions) in patients with GCA with or without arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION).

RESULTS

This study analyzed 18 patients with a median age of 75.5 years that included 12 females (66.7%). Seven patients (38.8%) had AAION. All patients initially received prednisolone treatment, while four (22.2%) underwent adjuvant treatment with methotrexate and azathioprine during prednisolone tapering. During the median follow-up of 3.5 months (interquartile range: 2.0-23.2 months), 4 patients (22.2%) had prednisolone-related adverse reactions, 2 (11.1%) relapsed, and 13 (72.3%) dropped out. Nine patients (50.0%) experienced remission, with this being sustained in four (36.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study observed high dropout rates and short follow-ups. Adverse effects of prednisolone were common, and relapses occurred in approximately one-tenth of Korean patients with GCA. Thus, optimizing GCA treatment necessitates regular monitoring and long-term follow-up.

Glucocorticoid discontinuation rate and risk factors for relapses in a contemporary cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis

The rates of relapses and therapy discontinuation in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the modern therapeutic era have not been defined. We aimed to evaluate the glucocorticoid (GC) discontinuation rate and the factors associated with relapses in a contemporary GCA cohort. Patient and treatment data were collected cross-sectionally at first evaluation and 2 years later (second evaluation), in a multicenter, prospective GCA cohort. Predictors of relapses were identified by logistic regression analyses. 243 patients with GCA were initially included (67% women, mean age at diagnosis: 72.1 years, median disease duration: 2 years) while 2 years later complete data for 160 patients were available and analyzed. All patients had received GCs at diagnosis (mean daily prednisolone dose: 40 mg) while during follow-up, 37% received non-biologic and 16% biologic agents, respectively. At second evaluation, 72% of patients were still on therapy (GCs: 58% and/or GC-sparing agents: 29%). Relapses occurred in 27% of patients during follow-up; by multivariable logistic regression analysis, large vessel involvement at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 4.22], a cardiovascular event during follow-up (OR = 4.60) and a higher initial GC daily dose (OR = 1.04), were associated with these relapses. In this large, real-life, contemporary GCA cohort, the rates of GC discontinuation and relapses were 40% and 27%, respectively. Large vessel involvement, a higher GC dose at diagnosis and new cardiovascular events during follow-up were associated with relapses.

Review of phase 2/3 trials in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis

INTRODUCTION

GCA (giant cell arteritis) and PMR (polymyalgia rheumatica) are two overlapping inflammatory rheumatic conditions that are seen exclusively in older adults, sharing some common features. GCA is a clinical syndrome characterized by inflammation of the medium and large arteries, with both cranial and extracranial symptoms. PMR is a clinical syndrome characterized by stiffness in the neck, shoulder, and pelvic girdle muscles. Both are associated with constitutional symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we assess the established and upcoming treatments for GCA and PMR. We review the current treatment landscape, completed trials, and upcoming trials in these conditions, to identify new and promising therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Early use of glucocorticoids (GC) remains integral to the immediate management of PMR and GCA but being aware of patient co-morbidities that may influence treatment toxicity is paramount. As such GC sparing agents are required in the treatment of PMR. Currently there are limited treatment options available for PMR and GCA, and significant unmet needs remain. Newer mechanisms of action, and hence therapeutic options being studied include CD4 T cell co-stimulation blockade, IL-17 inhibition, IL-12/23 inhibition, GM-CSF inhibition, IL-1β inhibition, TNF-α antagonist and Jak inhibition, among others, which will be discussed in this review.

Effectiveness and safety of a 26-week taper regimen of glucocorticoid in GCA patients: Results from a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of the 26-week tapering regimen of glucocorticoids (GC) used in the GiACTA trial in a prospective cohort of treatment-naive, biopsy-proven GCA patients.

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of biopsy-proven GCA enrolled in the GC arm of the START project (molecular stratification of patients with GCA to tailor GC and tocilizumab therapy) were included. All patients were treated with the 26-week taper regimen of GC used in the GiACTA trial. The primary endpoint was the rate of relapse-free remission at week 52. The secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with incident aortic damage, cumulative GC doses and GC-related adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

22 patients were included between December 2018 and February 2022. At week 52, 10 patients (45 %, 95 % CI 24-68) were in relapse-free remission. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 35 (22-40) months, 7 patients (32 %, 95 % CI 14-55) were in relapse-free remission. 18 patients with baseline large-vessel imaging underwent CT angiography at the end of the follow-up. No patients had evidence of new aortic dilation, significant progression of aortic damage or large vessel stenosis. 15/22 patients (68 %) had at least one relapse during follow-up. No patients developed visual or cerebrovascular manifestations during relapses. 15/22 (68 %) patients had at least one GC-related AE.

CONCLUSIONS

A 26 week taper regimen of GC was effective and safe in inducing and maintaining remission in a sizeable proportion of newly diagnosed GCA patients. However, the frequency of GC-related adverse events was high.

Visual manifestations in giant cell arteritis: identification of risk factors from the ARTESER Registry

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and predictive factors of visual manifestations in a large registry of patients with GCA.

METHODS

ARTESER is a large Spanish multicentre registry supported by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. It includes patients with GCA from across the entire country diagnosed between June 2013 and March 2019. The variables collected at diagnosis were demographics, clinical manifestations (including all visual manifestations), laboratory, temporal artery biopsy, and imaging findings (ultrasound, FDG-PET/CT, MRI angiography, CT angiography). Patients with and without visual involvement were compared in a bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine potential predictive factors of visual manifestations.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 1636 GCA patients, of whom 599 (36.6%) presented visual manifestations. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy was the most frequent (n = 274 of 599; 45.7%) ocular complication. The independent predictors that increased the risk (OR; 95% confidence interval) of visual involvement were older age (1.027; 1.009-1.045) and jaw claudication (1.724; 1.325-2.243). The variables associated with a reduced risk were polymyalgia rheumatica (0.541; 0.414-0.708), fever (0.373; 0.264-0.527), longer symptom duration (0.946; 0.909-0.985), and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (0.992; 0.988-0.997), common features of patients with large vessel-GCA.

CONCLUSION

One-third of GCA patients present visual manifestations at diagnosis. Older age and jaw claudication are independent predictors of visual manifestations, whereas polymyalgia rheumatica, fever, longer symptom duration, and high ESR reduce the risk of visual involvement.

Treatment for giant cell arteritis with 8 weeks of prednisone in combination with tocilizumab: a single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Even after the approval of tocilizumab, substantial glucocorticoid exposure (usually ≥6 months) and toxicity continue to be important problems for patients with giant cell arteritis. We aimed to assess the outcomes of a group of patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in combination with 8 weeks of prednisone.

METHODS

This prospective, single arm, proof-of-concept study was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA). Individuals aged 50 years or older who had new-onset or relapsing giant cell arteritis with active disease were eligible for inclusion. Participants received 12 months of tocilizumab 162 mg weekly subcutaneously in combination with 8 weeks of prednisone. The primary endpoint was sustained prednisone-free remission at week 52. Adverse events were also evaluated. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03726749), and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 28, 2018, and Nov 2, 2020, we enrolled 30 patients (mean age 73·7 years [SD 8·1], 18 [60%] women and 12 [40%] men, 30 [100%] White race, 15 [50%] new-onset disease, 23 [77%] temporal artery biopsy-proven, 14 [47%] imaging-proven). The initial prednisone doses were 60 mg (n=7), 50 mg (n=1), 40 mg (n=7), 30 mg (n=6), and 20 mg (n=9). All patients entered remission within 4 weeks from baseline. 23 (77%) of 30 patients were in sustained prednisone-free remission at week 52 and seven (23%) patients relapsed, with a mean time to relapse of 15·8 weeks (SD 14·7). Overall, four (13%) participants developed a serious adverse event, including one related or probably related to prednisone exclusively, two related or probably related to tocilizumab exclusively, and one related or probably related to prednisone, tocilizumab, or both. Two of the non-responder patients stopped tocilizumab and withdrew from the study prematurely after having a second disease relapse. No cases of giant cell arteritis-related permanent vision loss occurred during the study.

INTERPRETATION

These results suggest that 12 months of tocilizumab in combination with 8 weeks of prednisone could induce and maintain remission in patients with giant cell arteritis. Confirmation of these findings in a randomised controlled trial is required.

FUNDING

Genentech.

Polymyalgia rheumatica

Polymyalgia rheumatica is an inflammatory disease producing pain and stiffness, mainly in the shoulders and pelvic girdle, in people older than 50 years. Elevation of acute phase reactants is common due to the inflammatory nature of the disease. Since there are no specific diagnostic tests, diagnosis requires the exclusion of other diseases with similar presentations. Imaging has helped to identify the pathological substrate of polymyalgia rheumatica and it is increasingly used to support clinical diagnosis or to detect coexistent giant cell arteritis. Although polymyalgia rheumatica does not clearly impair survival or organ function, it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Glucocorticoids at 12·5-25·0 mg prednisone per day are effective in inducing remission in most individuals but, when tapered, relapses occur in 40-60% of those affected and side-effects are common. Assessment of disease activity can be difficult because pain related to common comorbidities such as osteoarthritis and tendinopathies, can return when glucocorticoids are reduced, and acute phase reactants are increased less during flares in individuals undergoing treatment or might increase for other reasons. The role of imaging in assessing disease activity is not yet completely defined. In the search for more efficient and safer therapies, tocilizumab and sarilumab have shown efficacy in randomised controlled trials and additional targeted therapies are emerging. However, judicious risk-benefit balance is essential in applying therapeutic innovations to people with polymyalgia rheumatica.

Relapse Risk and Safety of Long-Term Tocilizumab Use Among Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A Single-Enterprise Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a large North American cohort.

METHODS

Patients with GCA treated with TCZ between January 1, 2010, and May 15, 2020, were retrospectively identified. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time to TCZ discontinuation and time to first relapse after TCZ discontinuation. Poisson regression models were used to compare annualized relapse rates before, during, and after TCZ use. Age- and sex-adjusted risk factors associated with relapse on and off TCZ and development of adverse events of significant interest (AESIs) were examined using Cox models.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (60.5% female) were included with mean (SD) age 70.4 (8.2) years. Median duration from GCA diagnosis to TCZ start was 4.5 months. Median overall duration of TCZ treatment was 2.3 years. Relapse rate prior to TCZ start (0.84 relapses/person-year) was 3-fold reduced while on TCZ (0.28 relapses/person-year; P < 0.001) but increased to 0.64 relapses/person-year after TCZ discontinuation. Fifty-two patients stopped TCZ after a median of 16.8 months; 27 relapsed after discontinuation (median: 8.4 months; 58% relapsed within 12 months). Only 14.9% of patients stopped TCZ because of AESIs. Neither dose/route of TCZ, presence of large-vessel vasculitis, nor duration of TCZ therapy prior to discontinuation predicted relapse after TCZ stop.

CONCLUSION

TCZ is well tolerated in GCA, with low rates of discontinuation for AESIs. However, relapse occurred in > 50% despite median treatment > 12 months. Since the duration of TCZ prior to discontinuation did not significantly affect subsequent risk of GCA recurrence, further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy.

Quality standards for the care of people with giant cell arteritis in secondary care

OBJECTIVE

GCA is the commonest primary systemic vasculitis in adults, with significant health economic costs and societal burden. There is wide variation in access to secondary care GCA services, with 34% of hospitals in England not having any formal clinical pathway. Quality standards provide levers for change to improve services.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary steering committee were asked to anonymously put forward up to five aspects of service essential for best practice. Responses were qualitatively analysed to identify common themes, subsequently condensed into domain headings, and ranked in order of importance. Quality standards and metrics for each domain were drafted, requiring a minimum 75% agreement.

RESULTS

13 themes were identified from the initial suggestions. Nine quality standards with auditable metrics were developed from the top 10 themes. Patient Access, glucocorticoid use, pathways, ultrasonography, temporal artery biopsy, PET scan access, rheumatology/ophthalmology expertise, education, multidisciplinary working have all been covered in these quality standards. Access to care is a strand that has run through each of the developed standards. An audit tool was developed as part of this exercise.

CONCLUSION

These are the first consensus auditable quality standards developed by clinicians from rheumatology and ophthalmology, nursing representatives and involvement of a patient charity. We hope that these standards will be adopted by commissioning bodies to provide levers for change from the improvement of patient care of individuals with GCA.

Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Treatment Approaches and New Targets

Prolonged glucocorticoid tapers have been the standard of care for giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), but recent advancements have improved outcomes for patients with GCA while reducing glucocorticoid-related toxicities. Many patients with GCA and PMR still experience persistent or relapsing disease, and cumulative exposure to glucocorticoids for both diseases remains high. The objective of this review is to define current treatment approaches as well as new therapeutic targets and strategies. Studies investigating inhibition of cytokine pathways, including interleukin-6, interleukin-17, interleukin-23, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Janus kinase-signal transduction and activator of transcription, and others, will be reviewed.

Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement-baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort

Vertebral artery (VA) involvement in giant cell arteritis (GCA) has rarely been reported. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patients' characteristics, and immunotherapies used in patients with GCA and VA involvement at diagnosis and 1 year follow-up, retrospectively including patients being diagnosed between January 2011 and March 2021 in our department. Clinical features, laboratory data, VA imaging, immunotherapy, and 1 year follow-up data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were compared to GCA patients without VA involvement. Among all 77 cases with GCA, 29 patients (37.7%) had VA involvement, as diagnosed by imaging and/or clinical signs and symptoms. Gender distribution and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly different in the groups with and without VA involvement, with more women being affected (38/48 patients, 79.2%) and a significantly higher median ESR in patients without VA involvement (62 vs. 46 mm/h; p = 0.012). MRI and/or CT showed vertebrobasilar stroke at GCA diagnosis in 11 cases. 67/77 patients (87.0%) received high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroids (GCs) at diagnosis, followed by oral tapering. Six patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX), one with rituximab, and five with tocilizumab (TCZ). 2/5 TCZ patients achieved clinical remission after 1 year, vertebrobasilar stroke within the first year occurred in 2/5 patients. Diagnosis of VA involvement might be underrecognized in GCA patients. VA imaging should be performed in elderly patients with vertebrobasilar stroke presenting with GCA symptoms, not to miss GCA as the etiology of stroke. Efficacy of immunotherapies in GCA with VA affection and long-term outcomes need to be investigated further.

Biomarkers in the era of targeted therapy in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: is it possible to replace acute-phase reactants?

Research into giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has become more important in the last few decades. Physicians are facing several challenges in managing the diagnosis, treatment, and relapses of GCA and PMR patients. The search for biomarkers could provide elements to guide a physician's decision. In this review, we aim to summarize the scientific publications about biomarkers in GCA and PMR in the past decade. The first point raised by this review is the number of clinical situations in which biomarkers could be useful: differential diagnosis of either GCA or PMR, diagnosis of underlying vasculitis in PMR, prediction of relapse or complications, disease activity monitoring, choice, and modification of treatments. The second point raised by this review is the large number of biomarkers studied, from common markers like C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or elements of blood count to inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, or immune cell subpopulations. Finally, this review underlines the heterogeneity between the studies and proposes points to consider in studies evaluating biomarkers in general and particularly in the case of GCA and PMR.

Disease stratification in GCA and PMR: state of the art and future perspectives

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are closely related conditions characterized by systemic inflammation, a predominant IL-6 signature, an excellent response to glucocorticoids, a tendency to a chronic and relapsing course, and older age of the affected population. This Review highlights the emerging view that these diseases should be approached as linked conditions, unified under the term GCA-PMR spectrum disease (GPSD). In addition, GCA and PMR should be seen as non-monolithic conditions, with different risks of developing acute ischaemic complications and chronic vascular and tissue damage, different responses to available therapies and disparate relapse rates. A comprehensive stratification strategy for GPSD, guided by clinical findings, imaging and laboratory data, facilitates appropriate therapy and cost-effective use of health-economic resources. Patients presenting with predominant cranial symptoms and vascular involvement, who usually have a borderline elevation of inflammatory markers, are at an increased risk of sight loss in early disease but have fewer relapses in the long term, whereas the opposite is observed in patients with predominant large-vessel vasculitis. How the involvement of peripheral joint structures affects disease outcomes remains uncertain and understudied. In the future, all cases of new-onset GPSD should undergo early disease stratification, with their management adapted accordingly.

Predictors of Relapses or Recurrences in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A Medical Records Review Study

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common systemic vasculitis in individuals aged ≥50 years. Its course is marked by a high relapse rate requiring long-term glucocorticoid use with its inherent adverse effects. We aimed to identify factors associated with relapses or recurrences in GCA at diagnosis.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with GCA diagnosed between 2009 and 2019 and followed for at least 12 months. We recorded their characteristics at onset and during follow-up. Factors associated with relapses or recurrences were identified using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

We included 153 patients, among whom 68% were female with a median age of 73 (47-98) years and a median follow-up of 32 (12-142) months. Seventy-four patients (48.4%) had at least 1 relapse or recurrence. Headache and polymyalgia rheumatica were the most frequent manifestations of relapses. The first relapse occurred at a median time of 13 months after the diagnosis, with a median dose of 5.5 (0-25) mg/d of glucocorticoids.In multivariable analysis, patients with relapses or recurrences had a higher frequency of cough and scalp tenderness at diagnosis (20.3% vs 5.1%; odds ratio [OR], 4.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-17.94; p = 0.022; and 41.9% vs 29.1%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.07-5.39; p = 0.034, respectively). Patients with diabetes mellitus at diagnosis had fewer relapses or recurrences during follow-up (5.4% vs 19%; OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.83; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Cough and scalp tenderness at diagnosis were associated with relapses or recurrences, whereas patients with diabetes experienced fewer relapses or recurrences.

Giant Cell Arteritis: State of the Art in Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most prevalent subtype of vasculitis in adults. In recent years, there has been substantial improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of GCA, mainly attributed to the introduction of highly sensitive diagnostic tools, incorporation of modern imaging modalities for diagnosis and monitoring of large-vessel vasculitis, and introduction of highly effective novel biological therapies that have revolutionized the field of GCA. This article reviews state-of-the-art approaches for the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment options of GCA.

Oral or pulse glucocorticoid use at the onset of giant cell arteritis and its influence on the risk of relapse: a retrospective study

The objective is to investigate whether initial therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone pulses (ivMTP) or oral glucocorticoid (OG) influences the relapse rate in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients. This is a retrospective observational study of patients with GCA from 2004 to 2021. Demographics, clinical and laboratory variables, cumulative glucocorticoid dose and relapse rate at 6-month follow-up defined according to EULAR recommendations were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine possible risk factors for relapse. A total of 74 GCA patients were included for analysis (54 (73%) female, mean (SD) age 77.2 (7.4) years). Overall, 47 (63.5%) patients received ivMTP at disease onset and 27 (36.5%) OG. Mean (SD) cumulative prednisone dose (mg) at 6-month follow-up was 3790.7 (1832.7) for patients with ivMTP vs 4298.1 (2930.6) for the OG group, p = 0.37. A total of 15 (20.3%) relapses occurred at 6-month follow-up. Relapse rates did not differ according to the initial therapy (19.1 vs 22.2%, respectively, p = 0.75). In the multivariate analysis, fever at disease onset (OR 4.837; CI 1.1-21.6) and dyslipidemia (OR 5.651; CI 1.1-28.4) were independent predictors for relapse. Initial therapy with ivMTP or OG does not influence the relapse rate of GCA patients. Fever at disease onset and dyslipidemia are independent predictors of disease relapse.

Prognostic factors in giant cell arteritis associated aortitis with PET/CT and CT angiography at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Prognosis data on giant-cell arteritis (GCA)-associated aortitis are scarce and heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the relapses of patients with GCA-associated aortitis according to the presence of aortitis on CT-angiography (CTA) and/or on FDG-PET/CT.

METHODS

This multicenter study included GCA patients with aortitis at diagnosis; each case underwent both CTA and FDG-PET/CT at diagnosis. A centralized review of image was performed and identified patients with both CTA and FDG-PET/CT positive for aortitis (Ao-CTA+/PET+); patients with positive FDG-PET/CT but negative CTA for aortitis (Ao-CTA-/PET+), and patients solely positive on CTA.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included with 62 (77%) of female sex. Mean age was 67±8 years; 64 patients (78%) were in the Ao-CTA+/PET+ group; 17 (22%) in the Ao-CTA-/PET+ group and 1 had aortitis only on CTA. Overall, 51 (62%) patients had at least one relapse during follow-up: 45/64 (70%) in the Ao-CTA+/PET+ group and 5/17 (29%) in the Ao-CTA-/PET+ group (log rank, p = 0.019). In multivariate analysis, aortitis on CTA (Hazard Ratio 2.90, p = 0.03) was associated with an increased risk of relapse.

CONCLUSION

Positivity of both CTA and FDG-PET/CT for GCA-related aortitis was associated with an increased risk of relapse. Aortic wall thickening on CTA was a risk factor of relapse compared with isolated aortic wall FDG uptake.

Effectiveness of a two-year tapered course of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: A single-centre prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of tocilizumab tapering and withdrawal in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

GCA patients eligible for tocilizumab were prospectively enrolled. Tocilizumab was administered weekly for the first 12 months, every-other-week for an additional 12 months, then discontinued. Relapses on tocilizumab were managed with temporary increases in systemic glucocorticoids or addition of methotrexate. Primary outcome was relapse-free survival at month 6 after tocilizumab suspension. Relapse-free survival on tocilizumab, imaging response, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

23 GCA patients were enrolled. Reasons for tocilizumab start were relapse (n = 14), persistence of activity (n = 5), or steroid-related adverse events (n = 4). At tocilizumab start, two patients were on methotrexate, which was maintained. Fourteen patients had extracranial vascular involvement on 18FDG-PET/CT. During the first 12 months, four patients (17%) had clinical relapse. At every-other-week tocilizumab start, all patients were in clinical remission, two patients had active vasculitis on 18FDG-PET/CT; two patients were on steroid therapy, and four patients were taking methotrexate. Two patients (9%) relapsed while on every-other-week tocilizumab. At tocilizumab suspension, no patient was on steroid therapy and no patient had signs of active vasculitis on 18FDG-PET/CT. In the 6 months after tocilizumab discontinuation, six patients (26%) relapsed. No new or unexpected safety findings were identified.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab tapered over a two-year period was effective to induce and maintain remission in GCA. Relapses on tocilizumab were minor and responded to incremental changes in therapy. A significant proportion of patients relapsed in the 6 months after therapy suspension.

Outcomes during and after long-term tocilizumab treatment in patients with giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients during and after long-term tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with TCZ at a single centre (2010-2022). Time to relapse and annualised relapse rate during and after TCZ treatment, prednisone use, and safety were assessed. Relapse was defined as reappearance of any GCA clinical manifestation that required treatment intensification, regardless of C reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-five GCA patients were followed for a mean (SD) of 3.1 (1.6) years. The mean duration of the initial TCZ course was 1.9 (1.1) years. The Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated relapse rate at 18 months on TCZ was 15.5%. The first TCZ course was discontinued due to satisfactory remission achievement in 45 (69.2%) patients and adverse events in 6 (9.2%) patients. KM-estimated relapse rate at 18 months after TCZ discontinuation was 47.3%. Compared with patients stopping TCZ at or before 12 months of treatment, the multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) for relapse in patients on TCZ beyond 12 months was 0.01 (0.00 to 0.28; p=0.005). Thirteen patients received >1 TCZ course. Multivariable adjusted annualised relapse rates (95% CI) in all periods on and off TCZ aggregated were 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) and 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7), respectively (p=0.0004). Prednisone was discontinued in 76.9% of patients. During the study, 13 serious adverse events occurred in 11 (16.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Long-term TCZ treatment was associated with remission maintenance in most patients with GCA. The estimated relapse rate by 18 months after TCZ discontinuation was 47.3%.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the management of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and metaanalysis of cohort studies

OBJECTIVE

The search for new glucocorticoid-sparing disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs continues to be an unmet need in large vessel vasculitis (LVV). This report aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of leflunomide (LEF) in Takayasu arteritis (TA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature, searching for studies evaluating the efficacy of LEF in LVV. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects method.

RESULTS

The literature search identified eight studies that assessed LEF in TAK and seven in GCA. All were uncontrolled observational studies with a high risk of bias, implying a low or very-low certainty of evidence. In TAK, the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least a partial remission was 75% (95% CI: 0.64-0.84), angiographic stabilization was observed in 86% (0.77-0.94) and relapses in 12% (0.05-0.21). The mean reduction in the prednisolone dose (MRPD) after LEF treatment was 15.7 mg/d (10.28-21.16). Adverse events were observed in 8% of patients (0.02-0.16). Comparison of LEF with methotrexate (MTX) or cyclophosphamide revealed LEF to be superior in terms of remission induction, relapse prevention, and tolerance. When compared with tofacitinib, both drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy. In GCA, the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least a partial remission was 60% (0.17-0.95). The MRPD after LEF treatment was 15.63 mg/d (1.29-32.55) and 53% of the patients were able to discontinue glucocorticoids (0.25 - 0.80). Relapses were observed in 21% of cases (0.14- 0.28) and adverse events in 28% (0.12-0.46). Comparison of LEF with MTX showed similar efficacy and tolerance.

CONCLUSION

LEF is well tolerated and might be effective for patients with TAK and GCA.

Efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate in a real-life monocentric cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the indications, efficiency and tolerance profiles of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a real-life setting.

METHODS

From a monocentric database of >500 GCA patients, we retrospectively selected 49 patients who received MTX between 2010 and 2020. Cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) doses, the number of relapses and GC-related adverse events were recorded before, during and after MTX. We separately analyzed the 3 main indications of MTX, i.e., disease relapse, GC-sparing strategy, and GCA presentation.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 84 [10-255] months, 25 (51%) and 18/41 (44%) patients relapsed during MTX treatment and after its discontinuation, respectively. Among the 40 patients who relapsed before MTX, 26 (65%) experienced a new relapse after MTX introduction. Once MTX was introduced, 24 (49%) patients were able to discontinue GC after 20.5 [7-64] months. No significant difference in cumulative GC doses were noted before and after MTX introduction with a total GC dose of 14.7 [1.05-69.4] grams. At the last follow-up, MTX was discontinued in 41 patients, including 13 (32%) due to clinicobiological remission, 12 (30%) due to treatment failure and 15 (36%) due to side effects.

CONCLUSION

Our real-life study showed a modest beneficial effect of MTX on relapse in patients with GCA. However, we did not observe any GC-sparing effect in this study. Other studies are needed to assess the GC-sparing effect in patients in whom GC management is adapted from recent recommendations.

18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice

Diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and monitoring disease activity in patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be challenging. Early recognition of LVV and treatment adaptation is essential because vascular complications (aneurysm, dilatations, ischemic complications) or treatment related side effects can occur frequently in these patients. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT) is increasingly used to diagnose, follow, and evaluate treatment response in LVV. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current evidence on the value of 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis, follow, and treatment monitoring in LVV.

Epidemiology and predictors of relapse in giant cell arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to estimate the timing of relapse, the prevalence of multiple relapses and the predictors of relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception till November, 30 2021. Outcome measures include cumulative relapse rate (CRR) of first relapse at year 1, 2, and 5 after treatment initiation, CRR of second and third relapse and predictors of relapse.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (2595 patients) were included for timing of relapse, 16 studies (1947 patients) for prevalence of multiple relapses and 40 studies (4213 patients) for predictors of relapse. One-year, 2-year and 5-year CRRs were 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22-43%], 44% [95% CI 31-59%], and 47% [95% CI 27-67%], respectively. The duration of scheduled glucocorticoid therapy was negatively associated with the 1-year CRR (P=0.03). CRR of second and third relapse were 30% [95% CI 21-40] and 17% [95% CI 8-33%], respectively. Female sex (OR 1.43) and large vessel involvement (OR 2.04) were predictors of relapse.

CONCLUSION

Relapse occurred in almost half of GCA patients mainly during the first two years after diagnosis. One in three patients had multiple relapses. The optimal glucocorticoid tapering schedule, which seeks a balance between the lowest relapse risk and the shortest glucocorticoid duration, needs to be determined in future studies. Longer scheduled glucocorticoid therapy or early introduction of glucocorticoid-sparing agents may be warranted in female patients and patients with large vessel involvement.

Giant cell arteritis: Update on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis affecting people older than 50 years. The last decades have shed new light on the clinical paradigm of this condition, expanding its spectrum beyond cranial vessel inflammation. GCA can be now considered a multifaceted vasculitic syndrome encompassing inflammation of cranial and extra-cranial arteries and girdles, isolated or combined. Such heterogeneity often leads to diagnostic delays and increases the likelihood of acute and chronic GCA-related damage. On the other hand, the approach to suspected GCA patients has been revolutionized by the introduction of vascular ultrasound which allows a rapid, cost-effective, and non-invasive GCA diagnosis. Likewise, the use of tocilizumab is now part of the therapeutic algorithm of GCA and ensures a satisfactory disease control even in steroid-refractory patients. Nonetheless, some aspects of GCA still need to be clarified, including the clinical correlation of different histological patterns, and the prevention of long-term vascular complications. This narrative review depicts the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of GCA most relevant in clinical practice, with a focus on clinical updates and novelties introduced over the last decade.

Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology guidelines for the treatment of giant cell arteritis

Considerable variability exists in the way that health-care providers treat patients with giant cell arteritis in Latin America, with patients commonly exposed to excessive amounts of glucocorticoids. In addition, large health disparities prevail in this region due to socioeconomic factors, which influence access to care, including biological treatments. For these reasons, the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology developed the first evidence-based giant cell arteritis treatment guidelines tailored for Latin America. A panel of vasculitis experts from Mexico, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and Argentina generated clinically meaningful questions related to the treatment of giant cell arteritis in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) format. Following the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation methodology, a team of methodologists did a systematic literature search, extracted and summarised the effects of the interventions, and graded the quality of the evidence. The panel of vasculitis experts voted on each PICO question and made recommendations, which required at least 70% agreement among the voting members to be included in the guidelines. Nine recommendations and one expert opinion statement for the treatment of giant cell arteritis were developed considering the most up-to-date evidence and the socioeconomic characteristics of Latin America. These recommendations include guidance for the use of glucocorticoids, tocilizumab, methotrexate, and aspirin for patients with giant cell arteritis.

Diagnostik und Therapie der Großgefäßvaskulitiden – Wo stehen wir aktuell?

Die beiden Großgefäßvaskulitiden unterscheiden sich in mehrfacher Hinsicht, vor allem aber durch das Alter der betroffenen Patienten bei Erstmanifestation. Die Riesenzellarteriitis (RZA) ist eine Erkrankung des älteren Patienten wohingegen die Takayasu Arteriitis per definitionem vor dem 40 Lebensjahr auftritt. Die Diagnosen sind in den letzten Jahren durch verbesserte Bildgebung und Therapieoptionen mehr ins Bewusstsein gerückt. Neben der klassischen Steroidtherapie – welche bis heute Mittel der ersten Wahl ist – steht uns mit Tocilizumab, einem monoklonalen Antikörper gegen IL6-Rezeptor, zumindest für die RZA, eine zusätzliche hocheffektive Therapie zur Verfügung. Andere vielversprechende Substanzen befinden sich derzeit in Erprobung. Dieser Artikel soll einen Überblick zu Diagnostik und Therapie, aber auch einen Ausblick zu möglicherweise kommenden medikamentösen Optionen bieten.

Contribution of pathogenic T helper 1 and 17 cells to bursitis and tenosynovitis in polymyalgia rheumatica

Background

Although polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a very common rheumatic inflammatory disease, current insight into the pathobiology of PMR is limited and largely based on studies in blood. We investigated T helper 1 (TH1) and T helper 17 (TH17) cell responses in blood, synovial fluid and bursa tissue of patients with PMR.

Materials and methods

Blood samples were collected from 18 patients with new-onset PMR and 32 healthy controls. Synovial fluid was aspirated from the inflamed shoulder bursae or biceps tendon sheath of 13 patients. Ultrasound-guided biopsies of the subacromial-subdeltoid (SASD) bursa were obtained from 11 patients. T cells were examined by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining.

Results

Besides an increase of TH17 (CD4+IL-17+IFN-γ-) cells and T cytotoxic 17 (TC17; CD8+IL-17+IFN-γ-) cells, no other major changes were noted in the circulating T cell compartment of patients with PMR. Absolute numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were similar in blood and synovial fluid of patients with PMR. Synovial fluid T cells showed an effector-memory (CD45RO+CCR7-) phenotype. Percentages of TH1 (CD4+IFN-γ+IL-17-) cells and TH1/TH17 (CD4+IFN-γ+IL-17+) cells, but not TH17 or TC17 cells, were increased in the synovial fluid. Bursa tissue biopsies contained a small number of T cells, which were mostly CD8 negative. The majority of bursa tissue T cells produced IFN-γ but not IL-17. For comparison, B cells were scarcely detected in the bursa tissue.

Conclusion

Although the circulating TH17 cell pool is expanded in patients with PMR, our findings indicate that TH1 cells are involved in the inflammation of bursae and tendon sheaths in this condition. Our study points towards the TH1 cell pathway as a potential target for therapy in PMR.

New-onset versus relapsing giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab: 3-year results from a randomized controlled trial and extension

OBJECTIVE

Tocilizumab plus prednisone induces sustained glucocorticoid-free remission in patients with GCA. However, its long-term benefits in new-onset vs relapsing disease are uncertain, and the value of weekly vs every-other-week dosing has not been evaluated.

METHODS

In Giant-Cell Arteritis Actemra (GiACTA) part 1, patients with new-onset or relapsing GCA received blinded tocilizumab weekly (TCZ QW), tocilizumab every-other-week (TCZ Q2W) or placebo for 52 weeks, with a prednisone taper. In part 2 (open-label), patients were treated at investigator discretion for 104 weeks. In this analysis, patients were evaluated according to their original treatment assignments, and outcomes beyond 52 weeks were assessed. Outcomes of interest included time to first flare and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure over 3 years according to baseline disease status.

RESULTS

Part 1 enrolled 250 patients; 215 entered part 2. At baseline, 48% had new-onset disease and 52% had relapsing disease. In patients with new-onset and relapsing disease, the median time to first flare in the TCZ QW group was 577 and 575 days, respectively, vs 479 and 428 days with TCZ Q2W and 179 and 224 days with placebo; the median cumulative glucocorticoid dose was 3068 mg and 2191 mg with TCZ QW, 4080 mg and 2353 mg with TCZ Q2W, and 4639 mg and 6178 mg with placebo.

CONCLUSION

TCZ QW delayed the time to flare and reduced the cumulative glucocorticoid dose in patients with relapsing GCA and new-onset GCA. These data support initiating TCZ QW as part of first-line therapy in all patients with active GCA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01791153.

Longitudinal Characterization of Vascular Inflammation and Disease Activity in Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis: A Single-Center Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine and compare disease activity over time in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) using multimodal assessment combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging-based testing.

METHODS

Patients with GCA or TAK were enrolled into a single-center prospective, observational cohort at any point in the disease course. Patients underwent standardized assessment, including ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at enrollment and follow-up visits. Each FDG-PET finding was subjectively interpreted as active or inactive vasculitis. Global arterial FDG uptake was quantified by the PET Vascular Activity Score (PETVAS). Patients were stratified by disease duration at enrollment (0-2 years; 2-5 years; >5 years). Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's correlation, and linear regression were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients with large vessel vasculitis (GCA = 50; TAK = 76) were evaluated across 319 visits. Clinical disease activity was present in 33% of patients in the second to fifth year of disease and in 24% of patients evaluated >5 years after diagnosis. Active vasculitis by PET was observed in 66% of patients in years 2 to 5 after diagnosis and in 50% of patients enrolled >5 years into disease. PETVASs were consistently higher in GCA than TAK in the early and later phases of disease and significantly decreased over time in GCA but not TAK. Correlations between clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings were complex and varied with disease duration.

CONCLUSION

Disease activity in GCA and TAK is common throughout the disease course. Patterns of vascular PET activity at diagnosis and later in disease differ between GCA and TAK.

Baricitinib for relapsing giant cell arteritis: a prospective open-label 52-week pilot study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Preclinical vascular inflammation models have demonstrated effective suppression of arterial wall lesional T cells through inhibition of Janus kinase 3 and JAK1. However, JAK inhibition in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) has not been prospectively investigated.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, open-label, pilot study of baricitinib (4 mg/day) with a tiered glucocorticoid (GC) entry and accelerated taper in patients with relapsing GCA.

RESULTS

15 patients were enrolled (11, 73% female) with a mean age at entry of 72.4 (SD 7.2) years, median duration of GCA of 9 (IQR 7-21) months and median of 1 (1-2) prior relapse. Four (27%) patients entered the study on prednisone 30 mg/day, 6 (40%) at 20 mg/day and 5 (33%) at 10 mg/day. Fourteen patients completed 52 weeks of baricitinib. At week 52, 14/15 (93%) patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE) with the most frequent events, including infection not requiring antibiotics (n=8), infection requiring antibiotics (n=5), nausea (n=6), leg swelling (n=2), fatigue (n=2) and diarrhoea (n=1). One subject required baricitinib discontinuation due to AE. One serious adverse event was recorded. Only 1 of 14 (7%) patients relapsed during the study. The remaining 13 patients achieved steroid discontinuation and remained in disease remission during the 52-week study duration.

CONCLUSION

In this proof-of-concept study, baricitinib at 4 mg/day was well tolerated and discontinuation of GC was allowed in most patients with relapsing GCA. Larger randomised clinical trials are needed to determine the utility of JAK inhibition in GCA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03026504.

Does Tocilizumab Influence Ophthalmic Outcomes in Giant Cell Arteritis?

BACKGROUND

Despite appropriate use of corticosteroids, an important minority of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) develop progressive vision loss during the initial stages of the disease or during corticosteroid tapering. Tocilizumab is the only clearly effective adjunctive treatment to corticosteroids in the management of GCA, but questions regarding its efficacy specifically in the neuro-ophthalmic population and its role in mitigating vision loss have not been broached until recently.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The authors queried Pubmed using the search terms "GCA" and "tocilizumab" in order to identify English-language publications either explicitly designed to evaluate the influence of tocilizumab on the ophthalmic manifestations of GCA or those which reported, but were not primarily focused on, ophthalmic outcomes.

RESULTS

Recent retrospective analyses of populations similar to those encountered in neuro-ophthalmic practice suggest that tocilizumab is effective in decreasing the frequency of GCA relapse, the proportion of flares involving visual manifestations of GCA, and the likelihood of permanent vision loss. Data regarding the utility of tocilizumab to curtail vision loss at the time of diagnosis are limited to case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional corticosteroid monotherapy, treatment of GCA with both corticosteroids and tocilizumab may decrease the likelihood of permanent vision loss. Further prospective, collaborative investigation between rheumatologists and neuro-ophthalmologists is required to clarify the ophthalmic and socioeconomic impact of tocilizumab on the treatment of GCA.

Looking ahead: giant-cell arteritis in 10 years time

Although great improvements have been achieved in the fields of diagnosing and treating patients with giant-cell arteritis (GCA) in the last decades, several questions remain unanswered. The progressive increase in the number of older people, together with growing awareness of the disease and use of advanced diagnostic tools by healthcare professionals, foretells a possible increase in both prevalence and number of newly diagnosed patients with GCA in the coming years. A thorough clarification of pathogenetic mechanisms and a better definition of clinical subsets are the first steps toward a better understanding of the disease and, subsequently, toward a better use of existing and future therapeutic options. Examination of the role of different imaging techniques for GCA diagnosing and monitoring, optimization, and personalization of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents, further development and introduction of novel drugs, identification of prognostic factors for long-term outcomes and management of treatment discontinuation will be the central topics of the research agenda in years to come.

Blocking GM-CSF receptor α with mavrilimumab reduces infiltrating cells, pro-inflammatory markers and neoangiogenesis in ex vivo cultured arteries from patients with giant cell arteritis

BACKGROUND

Effective and safe therapies are needed for the treatment of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). Emerging as a key cytokine in inflammation, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) may play a role in promoting inflammation in GCA.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate expression of GM-CSF and its receptor in arterial lesions from patients with GCA. To analyse activation of GM-CSF receptor-associated signalling pathways and expression of target genes. To evaluate the effects of blocking GM-CSF receptor α with mavrilimumab in ex vivo cultured arteries from patients with GCA.

METHODS

Quantitative real time PCR, in situ RNA hybridisation, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, immunoassay, western blot and ex vivo temporal artery culture.

RESULTS

GM-CSF and GM-CSF receptor α mRNA and protein were increased in GCA lesions; enhanced JAK2/STAT5A expression/phosphorylation as well as increased expression of target genes CD83 and Spi1/PU.1 were observed. Treatment of ex vivo cultured GCA arteries with mavrilimumab resulted in decreased transcripts of CD3ε, CD20, CD14 and CD16 cell markers, and reduction of infiltrating CD16 and CD3ε cells was observed by immunofluorescence. Mavrilimumab reduced expression of molecules relevant to T cell activation (human leukocyte antigen-DR [HLA-DR]) and Th1 differentiation (interferon-γ), the pro-inflammatory cytokines: interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) and IL-1β, as well as molecules related to vascular injury (matrix metalloprotease 9, lipid peroxidation products and inducible nitric oxide synthase [iNOS]). Mavrilimumab reduced CD34 + cells and neoangiogenesis in GCA lesions.

CONCLUSION

The inhibitory effects of mavrilimumab on multiple steps in the GCA pathogenesis cascade in vitro are consistent with the clinical observation of reduced GCA flares in a phase 2 trial and support its development as a therapeutic option for patients with GCA.

Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in giant cell arteritis: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objectives

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is implicated in pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis. We evaluated the efficacy of the GM-CSF receptor antagonist mavrilimumab in maintaining disease remission.

Methods

This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with biopsy-confirmed or imaging-confirmed giant cell arteritis in 50 centres (North America, Europe, Australia). Active disease within 6 weeks of baseline was required for inclusion. Patients in glucocorticoid-induced remission were randomly assigned (3:2 ratio) to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Both groups received a 26-week prednisone taper. The primary outcome was time to adjudicated flare by week 26. A prespecified secondary efficacy outcome was sustained remission at week 26 by Kaplan-Meier estimation. Safety was also assessed.

Results

Of 42 mavrilimumab recipients, flare occurred in 19% (n=8). Of 28 placebo recipients, flare occurred in 46% (n=13). Median time to flare (primary outcome) was 25.1 weeks in the placebo group, but the median was not reached in the mavrilimumab group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.92; p=0.026). Sustained remission at week 26 was 83% for mavrilimumab and 50% for placebo recipients (p=0.0038). Adverse events occurred in 78.6% (n=33) of mavrilimumab and 89.3% (n=25) of placebo recipients. No deaths or vision loss occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Mavrilimumab plus 26 weeks of prednisone was superior to placebo plus 26 weeks of prednisone for time to flare by week 26 and sustained remission in patients with giant cell arteritis. Longer treatment is needed to determine response durability and quantify the glucocorticoid-sparing potential of mavrilimumab.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03827018, Europe (EUdraCT number: 2018-001003-36), and Australia (CT-2018-CTN-01 865-1).

From Active to Non-active Giant Cell Arteritis: Longitudinal Monitoring of Patients on Glucocorticoid Therapy in Combination With Leflunomide

In the present study, we longitudinally monitored leukocyte subsets, expression of neutrophil surface adhesion molecules (CD62L and CD11b) and serum analytes in therapy-naïve patients with active giant cell arteritis (GCA). We collected blood samples at the baseline, and at weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, and 48 of follow-up, and evaluated short- and long-term effects of glucocorticoids (GC) vs. GC and leflunomide. Our aim was to identify candidate biomarkers that could be used to monitor disease activity and predict an increased risk of a relapse. Following high doses of GC, the numbers of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes transiently increased and then subsided when GC dose tapering started at week 4. In contrast, the numbers of neutrophils significantly increased during the follow-up time of 12 weeks compared to pre-treatment time. Neutrophil CD62L rapidly diminished after initiation of GC therapy, however its expression remained low at week 48, only in patients under combinatorial therapy with leflunomide. Levels of acute phase reactant SAA and IL-6 decreased significantly after treatment with GC and leflunomide, while levels of IL-8, IL-18, and CHI3L1 did not change significantly during the follow-up period. CHI3L1 was associated with signs of transmural inflammation and vessel occlusion and might therefore serve as a marker of fully developed active GCA, and a promising therapeutic target. Patients with relapses had higher levels of IL-23 at presentation than patients without relapses (p = 0.021). Additionally, the levels of IL-23 were higher at the time of relapse compared to the last follow-up point before relapse. IL-23 might present a promising biomarker of uncontrolled and active disease and could give early indication of upcoming relapses.

Large-vessel vasculitis

Large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) manifests as inflammation of the aorta and its major branches and is the most common primary vasculitis in adults. LVV comprises two distinct conditions, giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, although the phenotypic spectrum of primary LVV is complex. Non-specific symptoms often predominate and so patients with LVV present to a range of health-care providers and settings. Rapid diagnosis, specialist referral and early treatment are key to good patient outcomes. Unfortunately, disease relapse remains common and chronic vascular complications are a source of considerable morbidity. Although accurate monitoring of disease activity is challenging, progress in vascular imaging techniques and the measurement of laboratory biomarkers may facilitate better matching of treatment intensity with disease activity. Further, advances in our understanding of disease pathophysiology have paved the way for novel biologic treatments that target important mediators of disease in both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. This work has highlighted the substantial heterogeneity present within LVV and the importance of an individualized therapeutic approach. Future work will focus on understanding the mechanisms of persisting vascular inflammation, which will inform the development of increasingly sophisticated imaging technologies. Together, these will enable better disease prognostication, limit treatment-associated adverse effects, and facilitate targeted development and use of novel therapies.

Glucocorticoid dosing and relapses in giant cell arteritis-a single center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between real life glucocorticoid (GC) dosing and relapse rates in patients with new onset giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a single center.

METHODS

Complete clinical data taken from the inpatient and outpatient records of consecutive GCA patients followed beyond stopping GC were retrospectively analyzed for GC doses, other immunomodulatory agents and relapses.

RESULTS

We included 54 patients with GCA confirmed by biopsy or imaging and followed over their complete GC course. In the 25% dose percentile, patients who needed no pulse therapy at onset reached a dose of 15 mg prednisolone or lower at day 40, of 7.5 mg prednisolone or lower on day 169 (after 24 weeks), and were off prednisolone on day 496 (70 weeks). They were below BSR-recommended doses between week 4 and week 12 and above these after week 14. The cumulative prednisolone dose reached in this 25% quartile was 3.74 g. Of the 54 patients, 24 (44%) relapsed, only 4 of whom had stopped GC clearly (17-58 weeks) earlier than the 25% dose quartile and one was distinctly (>10%) below the 25% GC percentile. Methotrexate treatment was not significantly associated with fewer relapses (p= 0.178).

CONCLUSION

Despite a long-term GC regimen with slow rates of reduction in the low dose range and high cumulative prednisolone doses, 44% of the patients relapsed. Only five (21%) of these relapses may have been prevented by adhering to the recommended GC regimen.