Efficacy of common salvage chemotherapy regimens in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective cohort study

Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE

Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develop relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease after receiving initial induction chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is the only curative therapy for R/R AML. Mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) is the current standard of care salvage regimen for R/R AML at Cleveland Clinic. The primary objective was to determine the overall remission rate (ORR: defined as patients achieving complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)) in R/R AML patients who received MEC.

METHODS

Adult patients with R/R AML treated with MEC between July 1, 2014 and September 30, 2022 were included. ORR and its association with baseline characteristics were determined. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and safety.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were evaluated. The ORR was 51.7% (33.3% CR and 18.3% CRi). The median time from receipt of MEC to CR/CRi was 7.7 weeks. Patients with bone marrow blasts ≤20% and peripheral blood blasts ≤30% at MEC initiation were more than twice as likely to achieve CR/CRi compared to those with a higher blast burden. The median OS was 6.3 months. Twenty-four (40.0%) patients proceeded to alloHSCT. Twenty-one (35.0%) patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) during their admission.

CONCLUSIONS

MEC is an effective salvage regimen for patients with R/R AML, especially among those with low disease burden at initiation. Febrile neutropenia, infections, and severe oral mucositis were common with MEC administration.

Treatment Patterns and FLT3 Mutation Testing Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in China: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction

For acute myeloid leukemia (AML), prognosis is particularly poor in patients harboring FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene mutations, though routine screening for these mutations at diagnosis has been shown to be insufficient. The understanding of the impact of FLT3 mutations on treatment decisions is limited.

Methods

In this retrospective, observational study, we investigated the key epidemiological characteristics, treatment patterns and responses among adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML in China, who initiated treatment from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, or progressed to relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML by December 31, 2020.

Results

Of the 853 ND AML patients included, 63.4% were screened for FLT3 status, and 20.1% tested positive (FLT3MUT) at initial diagnosis. Of 289 patients who progressed to R/R AML during the study period, 24.9% were screened at the diagnosis of R/R AML, and 19.4% tested positive; 20.5% of screened patients changed FLT3 status at first diagnosis of R/R AML. Initial treatment regimens or treatment responses did not seem to differ in patients with ND AML by FLT3 mutation status. In patients with R/R AML, there was an apparent difference in second-line treatment choices by FLT3 mutation status; however, the number of FLT3-mutated patients were limited to demonstrate any meaningful distinction. FLT3-mutated R/R AML was associated with shorter relapse time.

Conclusion

Study findings showed that there was a lack of routine testing for FLT3 mutations at first diagnosis of R/R AML, and initial treatment decisions did not differ by FLT3 mutation status. Given the clinical burden of FLT3MUT, likelihood of FLT3 status changes, and emerging FLT3 inhibitors, further routine FLT3 screening is needed to optimize treatment of R/R AML.

CLAG combined with total body irradiation as intensive conditioning chemotherapy prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia

Refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remains the major challenge of AML treatment. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only valid option to achieve cure, but the prognosis is still dismal. We conducted a retrospective analysis for the feasibility of CLAG regimens (cladribine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) combined with total body irradiation (TBI) as new intensive conditioning chemotherapy prior to HSCT in R/R AML. A total of 70 patients, including 21 primary refractory and 49 relapsed AML, were analyzed. Forty-nine (70%) patients had extramedullary diseases, and 54 (77%) patients received haploidentical transplantation. Except for one who died before white blood cell engraftment, all of the 69 evaluable patients achieved measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 46.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.5-57.7%) and 38.5% (95%CI, 26.8-50.0%). The 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 38.6% (95%CI, 27.3-49.3%) and 11.6% (95%CI: 5.4-20.3%), respectively. The presence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) showed a trend to be associated with a lower risk of relapse (P = 0.054) and extramedullary diseases with a higher risk of NRM (P = 0.074). Multivariate analyses identified low leukemia burden pre-HSCT (defined as bone marrow blasts ≤ 50%) and cGVHD as independent factors associated with favorable OS and RFS. In conclusion, intensive conditioning with CLAG regimens plus TBI may be an effective and well-tolerated choice for R/R AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Chidamide, Decitabine, Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, and Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor Therapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Study from a Single-Center

OBJECTIVE

Preclinical evidence and clinical trials have suggested synergistic effects of epigenetic modifiers in combination with cytotoxic agents for the treatment of leukemia. However, their efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remains unclear.

METHODS

Clinical data of R/R AML patients who received a CDCAG regimen (chidamide, decitabine, cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) from July 1, 2018 to October 31, 2021 at our center were retrospectively assessed, and the safety and efficacy of the CDCAG regimen were evaluated. Patients were followed up until November 30, 2021, with a median follow-up of 21.6 months (95% CI: 10.0-33.2 months).

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were enrolled. Two patients died within 3 weeks after the initiation, and therefore only 65 patients underwent the assement for clinical response and survival. It was found that 56.9% patients achieved complete remission with a median overall survival (OS) of 9.6 months. The median OS of responders was 25.9 months, while that of non-responders was 5.0 months (P<0.0001). Patients with gene mutations had a superior overall response rate (ORR) (80.4% vs. 45.5%, P=0.043) compared to those without gene mutations. The presence of DNA methyltransferase 3 A (DNMT3A), ten-eleven translocation-2 (TET2), and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) mutations did not affect the response rate (88.2% vs. 68.9%, P=0.220) and reflected a better OS (not attained vs. 9.0 months, P=0.05). The most common non-hematologic adverse events were pulmonary infection (73.1%), followed by febrile neutropenia (23.9%) and sepsis (19.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The CDCAG regimen was effective and well-tolerated in R/R AML patients, increasing the potential for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Moreover, patients with DNMT3A, TET2, and IDH1/2 mutations might benefit from this regimen.

Cladribine, cytarabine, and filgrastim based regimen in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the efficacy and safety of cladribine, cytarabine, and filgrastim-based regimen in relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML patients.

METHODS

Clinical studies were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase data. We selected available factors including complete remission (CR), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) to evaluate the efficacy, and early death (ED), and adverse events to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

15 records with 812 R/R AML patients were finally included and analyzed using the R software. Subgroups analysis was also conducted. The pooled CR rate for CLAG regimen, CLAG-M regimen, and CLAG combined with any other drugs regimen is 56% (95% CI: 46-66), 46% (95% CI: 34-56), 44% (95% CI: 26-64), respectively. The relapsed and refractory groups showed a CR rate of 68% (95% CI: 53-80), and 51% (95% CI: 45-58) with CLAG related regimens. As risk grade decreases, the pooled CR rate increases. Regarding the safety for CLAG-related protocols, systematic review was conducted.

CONCLUSION

The CLAG-related regimen is an effective and safe therapy for R/R AML patients, CLAG seems to have more superiority than CLAG combined therapy, though further studies including cladribine combination treatment protocols, are still needed to confirm our results further.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML in Japan who were ineligible for first-line intensive chemotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects elderly adults, and its prognosis worsens with age. Treatment options for patients in Japan ineligible for intensive chemotherapy include cytarabine/aclarubicin ± granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CA ± G), azacitidine (AZA), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), targeted therapy, and best supportive care (BSC). The country's aging population and the evolving treatment landscape are contributing to a need to understand treatment pathways and associated outcomes. This retrospective chart review evaluated outcomes in patients across Japan with primary/secondary AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy and began first-line treatment or BSC between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Of 199 patients (58% > 75 years), 121 received systemic therapy (38 CA ± G, 37 AZA, 7 LDAC, 39 other) and 78 received BSC. Median OS was 5.4, 9.2, 2.2, 3.8, and 2.2 months for CA ± G, AZA, LDAC, other systemic therapy, and BSC, respectively; median PFS was 3.4, 7.7, 1.6, 2.3, and 2.1 months, respectively. HRU rates were uniformly high, with > 80% patients hospitalized in each cohort. The poor clinical outcomes and high HRU among Japanese AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy highlight an unmet need for novel therapies.

A retrospective comparison of salvage intensive chemotherapy versus venetoclax-combined regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Background:

Evidence that a venetoclax (VEN)-combined regimen is effective in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) is emerging. However, it is unknown how VEN-combined low intensity treatment compares to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in medically fit patients with R/R AML.

Methods:

We compared AML patients who received IC (n = 89) to those who received a VEN in combination with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine (VEN combination) (n = 54) as their first- or second-line salvage after failing anthracycline-containing intensive chemotherapy.

Results:

The median age was 49 years, and significantly more patients in the VEN combination group were in their second salvage and had received prior stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall response rates including CR, CRi, and MLFS were comparable (44.0% for IC vs. 59.3% for VEN combination, p = 0.081), but VEN combination group compared to IC group tended to show lower treatment related mortality. The rate of bridging to SCT was the same (68.5%), but the percentage of SCT at blast clearance was significantly higher in the VEN-combined group (62.3% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.010). After median follow-up periods of 22.5 (IC) and 11.3 months (VEN combination), the median overall survival was 8.9 (95% CI, 5.4-12.4) and 12.4 months (95% CI, 9.5-15.2) (p = 0.724), respectively.

Conclusion:

VEN combination provides a comparable anti-leukemic response and survival to salvage IC, and provide a bridge to SCT with better disease control in medically-fit patients with R/R AML.

Cost-effectiveness of gilteritinib for relapsed/refractory FLT3mut+ acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and confirmed feline McDonough sarcoma (FMS)-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene mutations (FLT3^mut+) have a poor prognosis and limited effective treatment options. Gilteritinib is the first targeted therapy approved in the United States and Europe for R/R FLT3^mut+ AML with significantly improved efficacy compared with existing treatments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gilteritinib against salvage chemotherapy (SC) and best supportive care (BSC) over a lifetime horizon among adult patients with R/R FLT3^mut+ AML from a US third-party payer's perspective. METHODS: The model structure of this cost-effectiveness analysis included a decision tree to stratify patients based on their hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) status, followed by 2 separate 3-state partitioned survival models to predict the long-term health status conditional on HSCT status. The ADMIRAL trial data and literature were used to predict probabilities of patients being in different health states until a conservative cure point at year 3. Afterwards, living patients followed the survival outcomes of long-term survivors with AML. Model inputs for utilities, medical resource use, and costs were based on the ADMIRAL trial, published literature, and public sources. All costs were inflated to 2019 US dollars (USD). Total incremental costs (in 2019 USD), life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon with a 3.0% annual discount rate, the base-case model estimated that gilteritinib led to an increase of 1.29 discounted QALYs at an additional cost of $148,106 vs SC, corresponding to an ICER of $115,192 per QALY; for BSC, results were an increase of 2.32 discounted QALYs, $249,674, and $107,435, respectively. The base-case findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. The estimated probabilities of gilteritinib being cost-effective vs SC and BSC were 90.5% and 99.8%, respectively, in the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Gilteritinib is a cost-effective novel treatment for patients with R/R FLT3^mut+ AML in the United States. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported by Astellas Pharma, Inc., which was involved in all stages of the research and manuscript development. Garnham, Pandya, and Shah are employees of Astellas and hold stock/stock options. Zeidan consulted and received personal fees/honoraria and research funding from Astellas. Zeidan also has received research funding from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Trovagene/Cardiff Oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics; has participated in advisory boards; has consulted with and/or received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Aprea, Lox Oncology, Genentech, Servier, Jasper, Tyme, and Epizyme; has served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Geron, Gilead, Kura, Lox Oncology, BioCryst, and Celgene/BMS; and has received travel support for meetings from Pfizer, Novartis, and Cardiff Oncology. Qi and Yang are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., which received consulting fees from Astellas for work on this study. Part of this material was presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 7-10, 2019; Orlando, FL.

A budget impact analysis of gilteritinib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory FLT3 mut+ acute myeloid leukemia in a US health plan

AIMS

To estimate the economic impact of the introduction of gilteritinib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3 ^mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from a US payer's perspective.

METHODS

A budget impact model (BIM) was developed to evaluate the 3-year total budgetary impact of treating adults with R/R FLT3 ^mut+ AML eligible for gilteritinib in a hypothetical US health plan. Total costs (drugs/administration, hospitalization, monitoring, adverse events, transfusions, subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, post-progression, and FLT3 testing) were estimated before and after gilteritinib entry. The budget impact was the total cost difference between the two scenarios. The target population size and cost inputs were based on public data or published literature, drug market share was informed by market research data, and the model included recommended treatments for R/R FLT3 ^mut+ AML per clinical guidelines. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSAs) and scenario analyses varying key model inputs and assumptions were conducted to test for robustness.

RESULTS

In a hypothetical health plan with 1 million members, 20.9 adults with R/R FLT3 ^mut+ AML were estimated to be eligible for gilteritinib. Of these, it was assumed 30.0% would be treated with gilteritinib in Year 1 following gilteritinib entry, increasing the total plan budget by $663,795 and the per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost by $0.055. In Years 2-3, the market share of gilteritinib increased to 45.0%, increasing the total plan budget impact by $1,078,371 and $1,087,230, and the PMPM cost by $0.090 and $0.091, respectively. The model results remained robust in DSAs and scenario analyses, with the largest impact observed when the projected uptake of gilteritinib was changed.

LIMITATIONS

The results of this BIM are contingent upon the model's assumptions and inputs.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding gilteritinib to the formulary for the treatment of adults with R/R FLT3 ^mut+ AML had a minimal budget impact from a US payer's perspective.

Cell cycle inhibitors for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a review of phase 2 & 3 clinical trials

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically heterogeneous hematologic malignancy with poor long term outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the backbone of therapy especially among younger patients; however the effective incorporation of targeted therapies continues to be an area of active research in an effort to improve response durations and survival. Cell cycle inhibitors (CCI) are a novel class of agents which may be of particular interest for development in patients with AML. Areas covered: We will review the concept of CCIs along with available pre-clinical and clinical data in the treatment of AML both in North America and abroad. Specific drug targets reviewed include cyclin D kinase, Aurora kinase, CHK1, and WEE1. Expert opinion: Utilization of CCIs in patients with AML is an emerging approach that has shown promise in pre-clinical models. It has been challenging to translate this concept into clinical success thus far, due to marginal single-agent activity and significant toxicity profiles, however clinical evaluation is ongoing. Addition of these agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy and other targeted therapies provides a potential combinatorial path forward for this novel class of therapies. Developing optimal combinations while balancing toxicity are among the top clinical challenges that must be overcome before we can anticipate adoption of these agents into the armamentarium of AML therapy.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-ITD-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation after Quizartinib or Salvage Chemotherapy in the QuANTUM-R Trial

Despite the substantial clinical activity of fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors in relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-ITD‒positive acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), durable remissions and prolonged survival in this population require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Quizartinib, a once-daily oral, highly potent, and selective FLT3 inhibitor, significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and improved clinical benefit compared with salvage chemotherapy (median OS, 6.2 months versus 4.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], .76; 95% confidence interval [CI], .58 to .98; P = .018; composite complete remission [CRc] rate, 48% versus 27%; median duration of CRc, 2.8 months versus 1.2 months; mortality rate, .8% versus 14% by day 30, 7% versus 24% by day 60) in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML in the phase 3 QuANTUM-R trial. In this post hoc analysis, we described the characteristics of and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent on-study HSCT in QuANTUM-R at the investigator's discretion and institutional practices. Of 367 randomized patients, 78 (32%) in the quizartinib arm and 14 (11%) in the salvage chemotherapy arm underwent on-study allo-HSCT without any intervening therapy for AML after quizartinib or study-specified salvage chemotherapy. Pooled data of patients from both treatment arms showed a longer median overall survival (OS) in transplant recipients versus those treated without allo-HSCT (12.2 months versus 4.4 months; HR, .315; 95% CI, .233 to .427). Pooled data also showed a longer median OS in patients with a last recorded response of CRc before allo-HSCT versus patients without a CRc (20.1 months versus 8.8 months; HR, .506; 95% CI, .296 to .864). By treatment arm, the median OS was 25.1 months with quizartinib and 20.1 months with salvage chemotherapy in patients with a last recorded response of CRc before allo-HSCT. Forty-eight patients in the quizartinib arm continued quizartinib treatment after allo-HSCT. In the 31 patients with a last recorded response of CRc before allo-HSCT who continued quizartinib after allo-HSCT, the median OS was 27.1 months. Continuation of quizartinib after allo-HSCT was tolerable, and no new safety signals were identified. These results suggest that post-transplantation survival following salvage chemotherapy and quizartinib treatment are similar. However, quizartinib response occurs more frequently than with salvage chemotherapy, potentially allowing more patients to undergo transplantation and achieve durable clinical benefit. In addition, post-transplant quizartinib was found to be tolerable and may be associated with prolonged survival in some patients, highlighting its potential value in the management of patients with FLT3-ITD R/R AML.

A multi-institutional comparison of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine vs high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) has a poor prognosis and is best treated with salvage chemotherapy as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). However, the optimal salvage therapy remains unknown. Here we compared two salvage regimens; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) and mitoxantrone and high-dose Ara-C (Ara-C couplets). We analyzed 155 patients treated at three academic institutions between 1998 and 2017; 87 patients received MEC and 68 received Ara-C couplets. The primary endpoint was overall response (OR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of hospitalization, hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities, and success in proceeding to alloSCT. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts were well matched, though patients receiving Ara-C couplets had more co-morbidities (48.5% vs 33%; P = .07). OR was achieved in 43.7% of MEC and 54.4% of Ara-C couplets patients (P = .10). Ara-C couplets patients also trended towards a longer OS and PFS, more frequently proceeded to alloSCT (31% vs 54.4%; P = .003), and experienced less febrile neutropenia (94% vs 72%; P < .001) and grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicities (17.2% vs 2.94%; P = .005). No significant differences in other toxicities or median duration of hospitalization were noted. This is the first multi-institutional study directly comparing these regimens in a racially diverse population of R/R AML patients. Although these regimens have equivalent efficacy in terms of achieving OR, Ara-C couplets use is associated with significant reductions in toxicities, suggesting it should be used more frequently in these patients.

Molecular Targeting and Rational Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a molecularly complex disease with multiple aberrant genetic pathways involved in its pathogenesis. Approximately one-third to one-half of patients with AML would relapse, and no standard therapy is established for relapsing and/or refractory AML (RR-AML) yet. It is unlikely that blockage of only one specific pathway will lead to prolonged remissions and cures in all fractions of the AML patients population. Nowadays, novel therapeutic agents with rational combination are being recognized which improve the cure rate for relapsed AML. These drugs and their metabolites impart unique properties in the interaction with each of the intracellular targets and metabolic enzymes whereby resulting in unique clinical activity. To date, most of the combinations have used a targeted agent combined with standard agents such as anthracyclines, cytarabine, or hypomethylating agents to improve the outcome. Rational combinations of DNA damage-inducing therapies with DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors synergistically enhance the DNA damage, growth inhibition and apoptosis of myeloid cells. This review makes a thorough look at current antineoplastic agents for AML with emphasis on its genetics and molecular mechanisms of action and the role of combination regimens.

Comparison of efficacy of HCAG and CAG re-induction chemotherapy in elderly low- and intermediate-risk group patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and severity of adverse effects of HCAG and CAG re-induction chemotherapy in elderly low- and intermediate-risk group patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following induction failure.

METHODS

A total of 94 AML patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 46 were treated with HCAG chemotherapy, while 48 were treated with CAG chemotherapy.

RESULT

The complete remission (CR) was 39.6% in the patients with HCAG, while the CR was 33.3% in the CAG group. The overall remission (ORR) was 63.0% and 43.5% in patients of the HCAG and CAG groups, respectively (P = 0.038). The median survival time of progression free survival (PFS) was 8.0 (95% CI 3.843-10.157) months in the HCAG group and 7.0 (95% CI 2.682-13.318) months in the CAG group (P = 0.032). A total of 31 patients in the HCAG group suffered from grade 4 hematological toxicity, whereas 29 patients were treated with CAG (P = 0.622). A total of 27 (58.7%) cases indicated apparent pulmonary infection in the HCAG group, while 25 (52.1%) were noted with this complication in the CAG group (P = 0.519). Oral cavity toxicity was evident for 13 (28.3%) and 11 (23.0%) cases in the HCAG and CAG groups, respectively (P = 0.216).

CONCLUSION

The HCAG regimen was more effective than the CAG regimen in elderly low- and intermediate-risk group patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia although the HCAG regimen exhibited similar toxicity with that of the CAG group.

Decitabine-containing G-CSF priming regimen overcomes resistance of primary mediastinal neoplasm from early T-cell precursors to conventional chemotherapy: a case report

Early T-cell precursor (ETP) leukemia represents a new subtype of T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with unique immunophenotypes expressing T-cell and one or more of the myeloid/stem cell markers. Here, we report a young patient who had primary mediastinal mass and pleural effusion without bone marrow involvement. A CT-guided mediastinal biopsy and flow cytometry analysis of the pleural effusion revealed the blast cells to have complicated immunophenotypes: strongly expressed T-cell antigen CD7, myeloid-lineage antigens CD33 and CD13 and stem cell markers cTdT, CD34, and HLA-DR; dimly expressed myeloid-lineage specific antigen cMPO and B-cell antigen cCD79a; but did not express T-cell specific antigen cytoplasmic CD3 and B-cell specific antigen CD19. Clonal T-cell receptor rearrangement eventually determined the cell of origin from ETPs, not myeloblasts. The patient showed primary resistance to lymphoid and myeloid-directed induction therapy. Finally, low-dose decitabine combined with modified-CAG regimen induced a complete remission and allogeneic stem cell transplantation was performed as consolidation. The case indicates a primary mediastinal neoplasm from ETP with distinctive immunophenotype from leukemia type. Low-dose decitabine and modified-CAG regimen in combination with allogeneic stem cell transplantation may improve the outcome of patient.

Comparison of efficacy of HCAG and FLAG re-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia patients of low- and intermediate-risk groups

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of HCAG and FLAG re-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients of low- and intermediate-risk groups following induction failure.

METHODS

A total of 98 AML patients were enrolled. Among these subjects, 47 patients were treated with HCAG chemotherapy, while 51 patients were treated with FLAG chemotherapy.

RESULT

The complete remission (CR) and overall remission (OFF) were 24% and 38%, respectively in patients with HCAG induction chemotherapy, while the corresponding percentages were 28% and 42% in subject receiving FLAG chemotherapy. The median survival time of progress-free survival (PFS) was 29.8 (95% CI 23.749-35.851) months in the HCAG group and 30.8 (95% CI 21.728-39.872) months in the FLAG group (P = 0.620). A total of 42 patients in the HCAG group suffered from grade 4 hematological toxicity, while this adverse reaction was noted for all patients who were treated with FLAG chemotherapy (P = 0.023). A total of 19 cases indicated apparent nonhematological toxicity in the HCAG group, while only 40 (78.4%) were noted with these adverse reactions in the FLAG group (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The HCAG regimen exhibited a similar effect compared with the FLAG regimen in low- and intermediate-risk groups, although the HCAG regimen significantly decreased the toxicity compared with that noted in the FLAG regimen group.