1
|
Lim AHW, Zobel J, Bills M, Hsieh W, Crouch B, Joshi R, Thomson JE, Neo E, Kuan LL, Safaeian R, Tse E, Rayner CK, Ruszkiewicz A, Singhal N, Bartholomeusz D, Nguyen NQ. The Impact of Combined Chemotherapy and Intra-Tumoural Injection of Phosphorus-32 Microparticles on Vascularity in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3412. [PMID: 39410031 PMCID: PMC11475738 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Revised: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor intra-tumoural vascularity contributes to a lack of response to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancers. Preliminary data suggest that the addition of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided intra-tumoural injection of phosphorus-32 (32P) microparticles to standard chemotherapy is potentially beneficial in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We aimed to assess changes in pancreatic tumour vascularity following 32P implantation, using contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS). METHODS This was a prospective single-centre trial from January 2022 to 2024 of patients with unresectable, non-metastatic LAPC undergoing standard FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and 32P implantation. We performed CE-EUS pre-implantation after two chemotherapy cycles and 4 and 12 weeks after implantation. Time-intensity curves were analysed for 90 s after IV contrast bolus to ascertain peak intensity and intensity gain. RESULTS A total of 20 patients underwent 32P implantation, with 15 completing 12-week follow-up. The technical success of 32P implantation was 100%. The median primary tumour size reduced from 32 mm (IQR 27.5-38.75) pre-implantation to 24 mm (IQR 16-26) 12 weeks post-implantation (p < 0.001). Five patients (25%) had tumour downstaging, and four underwent resections. The baseline (pre-implantation, post-chemotherapy) median intensity gain of contrast enhancement within the tumour was 32.15 (IQR 18.08-54.35). This increased to 46.85 (IQR 35.05-76.6; p = 0.007) and 66.3 (IQR 54.7-76.3; p = 0.001) at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post-implantation, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 11.2 months (IQR 7.8-12.8), 15/20 (75%) of patients remained alive, with 3/20 (15%) demonstrating local disease progression. Overall survival was not significantly different between patients with or without an increased intensity of 10 a.u. or more at 12 weeks post-implantation. CONCLUSION This is the first clinical study to demonstrate treatment-induced increased vascularity within pancreatic primary tumours, which followed 32P implantation and FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Larger comparative trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Huoy Wen Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
- School Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (A.R.); (N.S.)
| | - Joshua Zobel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
| | - Madison Bills
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (M.B.); (W.H.); (B.C.)
| | - William Hsieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (M.B.); (W.H.); (B.C.)
| | - Benjamin Crouch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (M.B.); (W.H.); (B.C.)
| | - Rohit Joshi
- Medical Oncology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5112, Australia;
| | - John-Edwin Thomson
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (J.-E.T.); (E.N.)
| | - EuLing Neo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (J.-E.T.); (E.N.)
| | - Li Lian Kuan
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5011, Australia;
| | - Romina Safaeian
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
| | - Edmund Tse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
- School Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (A.R.); (N.S.)
| | - Christopher K. Rayner
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
- School Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (A.R.); (N.S.)
| | - Andrew Ruszkiewicz
- School Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (A.R.); (N.S.)
- Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Centre of Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Nimit Singhal
- School Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (A.R.); (N.S.)
- Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5081, Australia
| | - Dylan Bartholomeusz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (M.B.); (W.H.); (B.C.)
| | - Nam Quoc Nguyen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; (A.H.W.L.); (J.Z.); (R.S.); (E.T.); (C.K.R.); (D.B.)
- School Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (A.R.); (N.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boggi U, Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Barreto SG, Besselink MG, Fusai GK, Hackert T, Hilal MA, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Shrikhande SV, Truty M, Werner J, Wolfgang C, Bannone E, Capretti G, Cattelani A, Coppola A, Cucchetti A, De Sio D, Di Dato A, Di Meo G, Fiorillo C, Gianfaldoni C, Ginesini M, Hidalgo Salinas C, Lai Q, Miccoli M, Montorsi R, Pagnanelli M, Poli A, Ricci C, Sucameli F, Tamburrino D, Viti V, Cameron J, Clavien PA, Asbun HJ. REDISCOVER guidelines for borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: management algorithm, unanswered questions, and future perspectives. Updates Surg 2024; 76:1573-1591. [PMID: 38684573 PMCID: PMC11455680 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01860-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
The REDISCOVER guidelines present 34 recommendations for the selection and perioperative care of borderline-resectable (BR-PDAC) and locally advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (LA-PDAC). These guidelines represent a significant shift from previous approaches, prioritizing tumor biology over anatomical features as the primary indication for resection. Condensed herein, they provide a practical management algorithm for clinical practice. However, the guidelines also highlight the need to redefine LA-PDAC to align with modern treatment strategies and to solve some contradictions within the current definition, such as grouping "difficult" and "impossible" to resect tumors together. Furthermore, the REDISCOVER guidelines highlight several areas requiring urgent research. These include the resection of the superior mesenteric artery, the management strategies for patients with LA-PDAC who are fit for surgery but unable to receive multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the approach to patients with LA-PDAC who are fit for surgery but demonstrate high serum Ca 19.9 levels even after neoadjuvant treatment, and the optimal timing and number of chemotherapy cycles prior to surgery. Additionally, the role of primary chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in LA-PDAC, the timing of surgical resection post-neoadjuvant/primary chemoradiotherapy, the efficacy of ablation therapies, and the management of oligometastasis in patients with LA-PDAC warrant investigation. Given the limited evidence for many issues, refining existing management strategies is imperative. The establishment of the REDISCOVER registry ( https://rediscover.unipi.it/ ) offers promise of a unified research platform to advance understanding and improve the management of BR-PDAC and LA-PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy.
| | - Emanuele F Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| | - S George Barreto
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Center, Beadfor Park, Australia
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Tata Memorial Centre, Gastrointestinal and HPB Service, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mark Truty
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, LMU, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Alice Cattelani
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide De Sio
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Di Dato
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| | - Giovanna Di Meo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Cesare Gianfaldoni
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| | | | - Quirino Lai
- Department of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Miccoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Montorsi
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Andrea Poli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (IRCCS AOUBO), Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Sucameli
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Domenico Tamburrino
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Virginia Viti
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 10, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| | - John Cameron
- Department of Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saúde-Conde R, El Ghali B, Navez J, Bouchart C, Van Laethem JL. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Is More Better? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2423. [PMID: 39001485 PMCID: PMC11240662 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Saúde-Conde
- Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Benjelloun El Ghali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (B.E.G.); (C.B.)
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (B.E.G.); (C.B.)
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Digestive Oncology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manrai M, Tilak TVSVGK, Dawra S, Srivastava S, Singh A. Current and emerging therapeutic strategies in pancreatic cancer: Challenges and opportunities. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:6572-6589. [PMID: 34754153 PMCID: PMC8554408 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i39.6572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic carcinoma (PC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite early detection and advances in therapeutics, the prognosis remains dismal. The outcome and therapeutic approach are dependent on the stage of PC at the time of diagnosis. The standard of care is surgery, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The advent of newer drugs has changed the landscape of adjuvant therapy. Moreover, recent trials have highlighted the role of neoadjuvant therapy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable PC. As we progress towards a better understanding of tumor biology, genetics, and microenvironment, novel therapeutic strategies and targeted agents are now on the horizon. We have described the current and emerging therapeutic strategies in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Manrai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, Maharashtra, India
| | - T V S V G K Tilak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, Maharashtra, India
| | - Saurabh Dawra
- Department of Internal Medicine, Command Hospital, Pune 411040, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sharad Srivastava
- Department of Internal Medicine, Command Hospital, Pune 411040, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anupam Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160011, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Low Systemic Inflammation Response Index Predicts Good Prognosis in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2020:5701949. [PMID: 32802045 PMCID: PMC7414371 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5701949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated the prognostic significance of pretreatment systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods Present retrospective cohort analysis investigated consecutive 154 LAPC patients who received radical CRT. The SIRI was defined as: SIRI = neutrophil × monocyte/lymphocyte counts. Ideal SIRI cutoff(s) influencing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) results were sought by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary endpoint was the interaction between the SIRI and OS results. Results The median follow-up, PFS, and OS durations were 14.3 (range: 2.9-74.6), 7.9 [%95 confidence interval (CI): 5.7-10.1), and 14.7 months (%95 CI: 11.4-18.0) for the entire cohort, respectively. ROC curve analyses determined the ideal SIRI cutoff that exhibiting a significant link with OS and PFS outcomes at the rounded 1.6 point (AUC: 74.3%; sensitivity: 73.8%; specificity: 70.1%).The SIRI <1.6 patients (N = 58) had significantly superior median PFS (13.8 versus 6.7 months; P < 0.001) and OS (28.6 versus 12.6 months; P < 0.001) lengths than SIRI ≥1.6 patients (N = 96), respectively. Although the N0 (versus N1; P < 0.05) and CA 19-9 ≤90 U/mL (versus >90 U/mL) appeared as the other significant associates of better OS and PFS in univariate analyses, yet the results of multivariate analyses confirmed the SIRI <1.6 as the independent indicator of superior OS and PFS (P < 0.001 for each). Conclusion Pretreatment SIRI is a novel independent prognosticator that may further enhance the conventional tumor-node-metastases staging system in a more precise prediction of the OS and PFS outcomes of LAPC patients after radical CRT.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bouchart C, Navez J, Closset J, Hendlisz A, Van Gestel D, Moretti L, Van Laethem JL. Novel strategies using modern radiotherapy to improve pancreatic cancer outcomes: toward a new standard? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920936093. [PMID: 32684987 PMCID: PMC7343368 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920936093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive solid tumours with an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 7% for all stages combined. In this highly resistant disease that is located in the vicinity of many radiosensitive organs, the role of radiotherapy (RT) and indications for its use in this setting have been debated for a long time and are still under investigation. Although a survival benefit has yet to be clearly demonstrated for RT, it is the only technique, other than surgery, that has been demonstrated to lead to local control improvement. The adjuvant approach is now strongly challenged by neoadjuvant treatments that could spare patients with rapidly progressive systemic disease from unnecessary surgery and may increase free margin (R0) resection rates for those eligible for surgery. Recently developed dose-escalated RT treatments, designed either to maintain full-dose chemotherapy or to deliver a high biologically effective dose, particularly to areas of contact between the tumour and blood vessels, such as hypofractionated ablative RT (HFA-RT) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT), are progressively changing the treatment landscape. These modern strategies are currently being tested in prospective clinical trials with encouraging preliminary results, paving the way for more effective treatment combinations using novel targeted therapies. This review summarizes the current literature regarding the use of RT for the treatment of primary PDAC, describes the limitations of conventional RT, and discusses the emerging role of dose-escalated RT and heavy-particle RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Boulevard de Waterloo, 121, Brussels, 1000, Belgium
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Closset
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lambert A, Schwarz L, Borbath I, Henry A, Van Laethem JL, Malka D, Ducreux M, Conroy T. An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2019; 11:1758835919875568. [PMID: 31598142 PMCID: PMC6763942 DOI: 10.1177/1758835919875568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal solid organ tumors. Due to the rising incidence, late diagnosis, and limited treatment options, it is expected to be the second leading cause of cancer deaths in high income countries in the next decade. The multidisciplinary treatment of this disease depends on the stage of cancer at diagnosis (resectable, borderline, locally advanced, and metastatic disease), and combines surgery, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and supportive care. The landscape of multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer treatment is changing rapidly, especially in locally advanced disease, and the number of treatment options in metastatic disease, including personalized medicine, innovative targets, immunotherapy, therapeutic vaccines, adoptive T-cell transfer, or stemness inhibitors, will probably expand in the near future. This review summarizes the current literature and provides an overview of how new therapies or new therapeutic strategies (neoadjuvant therapies, conversion surgery) will guide multidisciplinary disease management, future clinical trials, and, hopefully, will increase overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Lambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine and Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital and Université de Rouen Normandie, France
| | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aline Henry
- Department of Supportive Care in Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - David Malka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 50519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy CEDEX, France
| |
Collapse
|