The impact of pain and opioids use on survival in cancer patients: Results from a population-based cohort study and a meta-analysis

Cordotomy for pain control and opioid reduction in cancer patients: A cancer center 11-year experience

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous lateral cervical cordotomy (PLCC) is a treatment option for predominantly nociceptive pain of oncological origin that is refractory to conservative methods, with unilateral distribution, particularly in the lower trunk or lower limbs of patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and opioid utilization alteration in patients undergoing PLCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients undergoing PLCC between 2011 and 2021 at the AC Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients and their respective surgical outcomes were analyzed. The mean preoperative pain intensity, as assessed by the mean numerical rating scale (NRS), was 8.4 (range: 4-10), while postoperatively, it decreased to 0.78 (range: 0-8). Lower postoperative NRS scores were observed for pain in the lower limbs and abdomen compared to the lower thorax. The mean preoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption was 231.0 mg (range: 30.0-1015.2). At 30 days postoperative, the mean consumption of OME was 120.2 mg (range: 0.0-705.0). Twelve months after surgery, the average consumption of OME was 98.3 mg (range: 0.0-396.0).

CONCLUSION

PLCC is a valuable therapeutic intervention for patients experiencing cancer pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatments. The anticipated analgesic outcomes are generally favorable, particularly in cases where the pain is localized unilaterally in the abdomen or lower body segments.

Influence of COMT (rs4680) and OPRM1 (rs1799971) on Cancer Pain, Opioid Dose, and Adverse Effects

Background: The influence of pharmacogenomics on opioid response, particularly with COMT (rs4680) and OPRM1 (rs1799971) variants, has been studied individually and in combination. However, most studies are in a noncancer context and not all their possible variant combinations have been examined. Objectives: This study examined COMT (rs4680) and OPRM1 (rs1799971), and their allele combinations, in advanced cancer to examine associations with pain scores, opioid dose, and adverse effects. Setting/Subjects: This multicenter prospective cohort study recruited patients receiving opioids for advanced cancer pain in Melbourne, Australia. Clinical data (demographics, opioids), validated instruments (pain and adverse effects), and blood (DNA) were collected. Descriptive analyses were used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes (opioid dose, pain, adverse effects) and genotypes of interest. Results: Fifty-four participants were recruited to the study. Those with COMT A allele required lower opioid doses [130 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 67.5,230) versus 180 mg (IQR 55,322.5), p = 0.047] and experienced greater adverse effects [sickness response aOR (adjusted odds ratio) 7.1 (95% CI 1.51,33.41), p = 0.01]. Those with the COMT GG/OPRM1 G allele combination required higher opioid doses [322.5 mg (IQR 264,360) versus 125 mg (65,225), (p = 0.04)]. Those with COMT AG/OPRM1 AA experienced higher average pain [aOR 1.55 (95% CI 1.03, 2.33), p = 0.04] and moderate-severe nausea [aOR 5.47 (95% CI 1.35, 22.21), p = 0.02] but reduced drowsiness [aOR 0.25 (95% CI 0.06, 1.02), p = 0.05]. Conclusions: Patients with cancer with the COMT alternate (A) allele have greater sickness response adverse effects, which may be responsible for the lower opioid doses observed. Significant results of two new COMT/OPRM1 genotype combinations are presented that have not previously been studied, with plausible phenotype descriptions suggested.

Assessing Pain and Functional Outcomes of Percutaneous Stabilization of Metastatic Pelvic Lesions via Photodynamic Nails: A Bi-Institutional Investigation of Orthopaedic Outcomes

Background

Minimally invasive surgical interventions for metastatic invasion of the pelvis have become more prevalent and varied. Our group hypothesized that the use of percutaneous photodynamic nails (PDNs) would result in decreased pain, improved functional outcomes and level of ambulation, and decreased use of opioid pain medication.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic pelvic bone disease undergoing stabilization with PDNs (IlluminOss Medical) at 2 institutions. Functional outcome measures assessed include the Combined Pain and Ambulatory Function (CPAF), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, and PROMIS Global Health-Physical. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year following surgery.

Results

A total of 39 patients treated with PDNs were included. No cases of surgical site infection or implant failure were identified. The median pain VAS score decreased from 8 preoperatively to 0 at the 6-week time point (p < 0.0001). The median CPAF score improved from 5.5 points preoperatively to 7 points at the 3-month mark (p = 0.0132). A significant improvement in physical function was seen at 6 months in the PROMIS Physical Function (p = 0.02) and at both 6 months (p = 0.01) and 1 year (p < 0.01) for the PROMIS Global Health-Physical. The rate of patients prescribed opioid analgesia dropped from 100% preoperatively to 20% at 6 months following surgery (p < 0.001). By 6 weeks, all patients were fully weight-bearing and able to walk independently with or without assistive devices.

Conclusions

Percutaneous stabilization of metastatic periacetabular defects using PDNs is a safe and effective palliative procedure that has been shown to improve patient mobility and provide early pain relief.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opioids and Cancer: Current Understanding and Clinical Considerations

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer. Pain not only negatively affects the quality of life of patients with cancer, but it has also been associated with reduced survival. Pain management is therefore a critical component of cancer care. Prescription opioids remain the first-line approach for the management of moderate-to-severe pain associated with cancer. However, there has been increasing interest in understanding whether these analgesics could impact cancer progression. Furthermore, epidemiological data link a possible association between prescription opioid usage and cancer development. Until more robust evidence is available, patients with cancer with moderate-to-severe pain may receive opioids to decrease suffering. However, future studies should be conducted to evaluate the role of opioids and opioid receptors in specific cancers.

Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients Taking Opioids and Psychotropic Medications Before Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The impact of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) on quality of life (QoL) for patients taking opioids and psychotropic medications preoperatively is unclear.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed a CRS-HIPEC single-center prospectively maintained database for 2012-2016. Demographics and clinical data on opioids/psychotropic medication use were collected via chart review. The study collected QoL outcomes at baseline, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Brief Pain Inventory, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Differences in QoL between the groups were calculated using repeated measures analysis of variance regression. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 388 patients, 44.8% were taking opioids/psychotropic medications preoperatively. At baseline, those taking opioids/psychotropic medications preoperatively versus those not taking these medications had significantly worse QoL. By 1 year postoperatively, the QoL measures did not differ significantly except for emotional functioning (e.g., no medications vs. opioids/psychotropic medications: CES-D, 5.6 vs. 10.1). Median survival did not differ significantly (opioids/psychotropic medications vs. no medications: 52.3 vs. 60.6 months; p = 0.66). At 1 year after surgery, a greater percentage of patients were taking opioids, psychotropic medications, or both than at baseline (63.2% vs. 44.8%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite worse baseline QoL, patients who took opioids/psychotropic medications had QoL scores 1 year postoperatively similar to the scores of those who did not except in the emotional domains. These data point to the potential utility of a timed psychosocial intervention to enhance emotional adaptation and further support the role of CRS-HIPEC in improving QoL.

Anti-Algics in the Therapeutic Response of Breast and Urological Cancers

The effect of anti-algics on tumor progression and the overall survival of patients is controversial and remains unclear. Herein, we disclose the in vitro effects of the local anesthetics lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine on breast (MCF7), prostate (PC3, LNCaP), and bladder (TCCSUP, HT1376) cancer cell lines, both as monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care therapeutics. Assays for cell proliferation, viability, death profile, and migration were performed. Additionally, we explored the clinical outcomes of opioid use through a cross-sectional study involving 200 metastatic prostate cancer patients. The main clinical data collected included the type of opioid therapy administered, dosage, treatment duration, disease progression, and overall survival. Results obtained demonstrate that treatment with local anesthetics has a promising selective anti-tumor effect on these types of cancer, with higher effects when associated with docetaxel. This points out the use of local anesthetics as an added value in the treatment of prostate carcinoma patients. Alternatively, chronic opioid use was correlated with reduced overall survival (p < 0.05) and progression-free survival (p < 0.05) at each treatment line in the observational study. While these results provide valuable insights, larger prospective studies are imperative to comprehensively evaluate the clinical impact of opioid analgesics in prostate cancer patients.

Effects of Acetaminophen Exposure on Outcomes of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

(1) Background: Several studies have investigated potential interactions between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and commonly prescribed medications. Although acetaminophen (APAP) has not been considered susceptible to interaction with ICIs, recent research has shown that detectable plasma levels of this drug can hinder the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies. A reliable assessment of the potential interaction between APAP and ICIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients would be worthwhile since it is often prescribed in this condition. We sought to evaluate the impact of the concomitant use of APAP in patients with advanced NSCLC on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade using real-world evidence. (2) Methods: This study included consecutive patients with histologically proven stage IV NSCLC who underwent first-line therapy with pembrolizumab as a single agent or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, or second-line therapy with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab. The intensity of APAP exposure was classified as low (therapeutic intake lasting less than 24 h or a cumulative intake lower than 60 doses of 1000 mg) or high (therapeutic intake lasting more than 24 h or a total intake exceeding 60 doses of 1000 mg). The favorable outcome of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies was defined by durable clinical benefit (DCB). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were relevant to our efficacy analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were applied to adjust for differences between the APAP exposure subgroups. (3) Results: Over the course of April 2018 to October 2022, 80 patients were treated with first-line pembrolizumab either as single-agent therapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. During the period from June 2015 to November 2022, 145 patients were given anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy as second-line treatment. Subsequent efficacy analyses relied on adjusted PSM populations in both treatment settings. Multivariate testing revealed that only the level of APAP and corticosteroid intake had an independent effect on DCB in both treatment lines. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed high exposure to APAP and immunosuppressive corticosteroid therapy as independent predictors of shorter PFS and OS in both treatment settings. (4) Conclusions: Our findings would strengthen the available evidence that concomitant intake of APAP blunts the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. The detrimental effects appear to depend on the cumulative dose and duration of exposure to APAP. The inherent shortcomings of the current research warrant confirmation in larger independent series.

Impact of Opioids on Cellular Metabolism: Implications for Metabolic Pathways Involved in Cancer

Opioid utilization for pain management is prevalent among cancer patients. There is significant evidence describing the many effects of opioids on cancer development. Despite the pivotal role of metabolic reprogramming in facilitating cancer growth and metastasis, the specific impact of opioids on crucial oncogenic metabolic pathways remains inadequately investigated. This review provides an understanding of the current research on opioid-mediated changes to cellular metabolic pathways crucial for oncogenesis, including glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, glutaminolysis, and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The existing literature suggests that opioids affect energy production pathways via increasing intracellular glucose levels, increasing the production of lactic acid, and reducing ATP levels through impediment of OXPHOS. Opioids modulate pathways involved in redox balance which may allow cancer cells to overcome ROS-mediated apoptotic signaling. The majority of studies have been conducted in healthy tissue with a predominant focus on neuronal cells. To comprehensively understand the impact of opioids on metabolic pathways critical to cancer progression, research must extend beyond healthy tissue and encompass patient-derived cancer tissue, allowing for a better understanding in the context of the metabolic reprogramming already undergone by cancer cells. The current literature is limited by a lack of direct experimentation exploring opioid-induced changes to cancer metabolism as they relate to tumor growth and patient outcome.

Effects of Opioids on Immune and Endocrine Function in Patients with Cancer Pain

OPINION STATEMENT

Opioids are an important treatment in managing cancer pain. Uncontrolled pain can be detrimental to function and quality of life. Common adverse effects of opioids such as sedation, constipation and nausea are well recognised, but opioid effects on the endocrine and immune systems are less apparent. The evidence for the immunomodulatory effects of opioids suggest that some opioids might be immunosuppressive and that their use might be associated with reduced survival and increased rates of infection in patients with cancer. However, the quality of this evidence is limited. Opioid-induced endocrinopathies, in particular opioid-induced hypogonadism, may also impact cancer survival and impair quality of life. But again, evidence in patients with cancer is limited, especially with regard to their management. There are some data that different opioids influence immune and endocrine function with varying outcomes. For example, some opioids, such as tramadol and buprenorphine, demonstrate immune-sparing qualities when compared to others. However, most of this data is preclinical and without adequate clinical correlation; thus, no opioid can currently be recommended over another in this context. Higher opioid doses might have more effect on immune and endocrine function. Ultimately, it is prudent to use the lowest effective dose to control the cancer pain. Clinical presentations of opioid-induced endocrinopathies should be considered in patients with cancer and assessed for, particularly in long-term opioid users. Hormone replacement therapies may be considered where appropriate with support from endocrinology specialists.

Opioid use disorder in cancer patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The misuse of opioids has increased significantly in recent decades. Historically, cancer patients have not been considered at risk of opioid misuse. However, cancer pain is common, and opioids are often prescribed. Guidelines addressing opioid misuse often exclude cancer patients. Given that misuse is associated with significant harm and a reduction in quality of life, it is important to understand the risk of opioid misuse in cancer patients and how we can recognise and treat it.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early cancer diagnoses and treatments have improved cancer survival rates, leading to a larger population of cancer patients and survivors. Opioid use disorder (OUD) may precede a cancer diagnosis or may develop during or after treatment. The effect of OUD extends from an individual patient to a societal level. This review examines the increasing incidence of OUD in cancer patients, ways to identify patients with OUD such as behaviour change and screening scales, prevention of OUD such as limited and targeted opioid prescriptions, and evidence-based treatment suggestions for OUD.

SUMMARY

OUD in cancer patients has only relatively recently been recognised as a growing problem. Early identification, involvement of the multidisciplinary team, and treatment can reduce the negative impact of OUD.

Opioid-induced microbial dysbiosis disrupts irinotecan (CPT-11) metabolism and increases gastrointestinal toxicity in a murine model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Opioids are commonly used for the management of cancer-associated pain and chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. The chemotherapeutic irinotecan (CPT-11) causes severe gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity due to deconjugation of inactive metabolite SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) by bacterial β-glucuronidases to the active 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). Opioids are known to cause gut microbial dysbiosis, this study evaluated whether CPT-11 anti-tumour efficacy and GI toxicity are exacerbated by opioid co-administration.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Eight-week-old C57BL/6 male mice were co-administration with CPT-11 ± opioid. 16S rRNA sequencing was used for gut microbiome analysis. LC-MS analyses of plasma and intestinal extracts were performed to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of CPT-11. Histological analysis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to determine the severity of intestinal tissue damage. Human liver microsome In vitro assay was performed to confirm the effects of opioids on CPT-11 metabolism.

KEY RESULTS

Gut microbiome analysis showed that morphine treatment induced enrichment of β-glucuronidase-producing bacteria in the intestines of CPT-11-treated mice, resulting in SN-38 accumulation and exacerbation of GI toxicity in the small intestine. Oral administration of both antibiotics and glucuronidase inhibitor protected mice against GI toxicity induced with CPT-11 and morphine co-administration, implicating a microbiome-dependent mechanism. Additionally, morphine and loperamide decreased the plasma concentration of SN-38 and compromised CPT-11 anti-tumour efficacy, this seemed to be microbiome independent.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Gut microbiota play a significant role in opioid and chemotherapeutic agent drug-drug interactions. Inhibition of gut microbial glucuronidase may also prevent adverse GI effects of CPT-11 in patients on opioids.

Exposure to Commonly Used Drugs and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses

Recently, attention has been paid to some medications and gastric cancer (GC) risk. This review aimed to evaluate associations between commonly used drugs and GC risk and to grade evidence from published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This umbrella review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022320276). The systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies were retrieved by searching Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. The evidence strength of commonly used drugs and GC risk was categorized into four grades: weak, suggestive, highly suggestive, and strong. Of 19 associations between commonly used drugs and GC risk and its subtypes, none was supported by convincing or highly suggestive evidence. The risk of GC related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acid-suppressive drugs, as well as the risk of non-cardia GC related to NSAIDs and aspirin, was supported by suggestive evidence. The results showed that a reduced GC risk was associated with two drug types (NSAIDs and non-aspirin NSAIDs), and an increased GC risk was associated with acid-suppressing drugs at the suggestive evidence level. Moreover, NSAIDs and aspirin reduced non-cardia GC risk as supported by suggestive evidence. However, the evidence supporting statins or metformin in reducing GC risk was weak, and thus future studies are required to clarify these associations.

Implementation of a peri-operative pain-management algorithm reduces the use of opioid analgesia following pelvic exenteration surgery

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the implementation and pain-related outcomes of a peri-operative pain-management regimen for patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery at a university teaching hospital.

METHOD

This is a single-site prospective observational cohort study involving 100 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery between January 2017 and December 2018. A pain-management algorithm regarding the use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia was developed between the departments of anaesthesia, pain management and intensive care. The primary outcomes were: compliance with a pain-treatment algorithm compared with a similar retrospective surgical patient cohort in 2013-2014; and requirements for regular doses of opioid analgesia at discharge, measured in oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMEDD).

RESULTS

Following the introduction of a pain-management algorithm, regional anaesthesia techniques (spinal anaesthesia, transversus abdominus plane block, preperitoneal catheters or epidural analgesia) were used in 83/98 (84.7%) of the 2017-2018 cohort compared with 13/73 (17.8%) of the 2013-2014 cohort (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in the median dose of opioid analgesics (oMEDD) at time of discharge, from 150 mg (interquartile range [IQR]: 75.0-235.0 mg) in the 2013-2014 cohort to 10 mg (IQR: 0.00-45.0 mg) in the 2017-2018 cohort (p < 0.001). There was no change in pain intensity (assessed using the Verbal Numerical Rating Score) or oMEDD in the first 7 days following surgery.

CONCLUSION

Since implementation of a novel peri-operative pain-treatment algorithm, the use of opioid-sparing regional techniques and preperitoneal catheters has increased. Additionally, the dose of opioids required at the time of discharge has reduced significantly.

Effect of Opioids on Survival in Patients with Cancer

Opioids are commonly used for pain management in patients with cancer. They have a range of unwanted effects, including some that potentially influence cancer growth. This article reviews the data assessing the effects of opioids on survival in patients with cancer. Many studies assessing this show an association between opioids and decreased survival. This effect is present even at very low doses of opioids. These studies do not assess causality, so it is not known if it is a direct effect of opioids on survival. As the control groups are not matched to the opioid group it might be that opioids are being used to control pain and patients receiving opioids have more aggressive cancers and it is the underlying cancer which is causing the decreased survival. Furthermore, although some studies allude to different opioids having different effects on survival, often all opioids are pooled in analysis. Future work needs to try to ascertain causality and differentiate between different opioids, pain, and cancer-mediated effects on survival in specific cancer types. Until then, opioids should continue to be used in patients with cancer as part of measures to optimise comfort and quality of life.

Examining the interrelationships between mindfulness-based interventions, depression, inflammation, and cancer survival

Depression is highly prevalent in those diagnosed with cancer and is also associated with poorer prognostic outcomes. Mindfulness-based interventions are effective in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with cancer. The objective of this review was to investigate whether mindfulness practices can improve survival and, if so, what mechanisms of action may contribute to these outcomes. Although no long-term studies have investigated this hypothesis, the current literature supports an inflammatory basis for depression, implicating proinflammatory cytokines and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction as contributing factors. Markers of inflammation, such as interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and cortisol, are all found at elevated concentrations in many depressed individuals. These exact mechanisms are associated with higher mortality in patients with cancer. Mindfulness has been studied for its effects on cytokine and cortisol levels, and there are promising data to support that the intervention can measurably decrease inflammation. Therefore, it is conceivable that mindfulness programs can affect survival in this population. There are limited data on the long-term effects of mindfulness on depression and inflammatory markers in patients with cancer, and there are potential barriers to the implementation of mindfulness-based interventions as part of a comprehensive treatment plan. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore these questions through longitudinal studies to establish a survival correlation. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:490-502.

When Management of Cancer-Related Pain Is Complicated by Coexisting Opioid Use Disorder: A Case Review

Patients with cancer are living longer, and many experience pain secondary to tumor invasion or as a consequence of cancer-directed therapies. Opioid use disorders and associated morbidity and mortality have increased with dramatic rise during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. National and international stakeholders have developed clinical practice guidelines in an effort to curb opioid misuse and overdose-related death. However, to ensure that patients with cancer do not experience barriers to adequate pain management, most of these guidelines are not intended for patients with cancer-related pain or for those receiving palliative or hospice care. Oncology, palliative, and hospice care providers are increasingly tasked with the management of severe disease-related pain in the setting of coexisting opioid use disorder without research on the most effective risk and harm reduction strategies to guide care. Clinicians should be familiar with addiction medicine and chronic pain literature and be able to incorporate some of these best practices. This case study reviews the management of severe cancer-related pain in a patient with co-occurring opioid use disorder, utilizing many of the best practices in available clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic non-cancer-related pain.

Less Well-Known Consequences of the Long-Term Use of Opioid Analgesics: A Comprehensive Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The adverse effects of short-term opioid analgesics are well known and acknowledged; however, the spectrum of the sequelae of long-term use seems less clear. Some effects may remain undetected but still have the potential to cause harm and reduce patients' quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy.

METHODS

We performed a quasi-systematic search, analyzing articles published in the MEDLINE database between January 2000 and March 2021 that identified adverse effects of opioids used for chronic pain treatment.

RESULTS

Growing evidence indicates that there are multiple serious adverse effects of opioid treatment. Long-term opioid use may have significant effects on the endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neural systems. Studies show that long-term opioid treatment increases the risk of fractures, infections, cardiovascular complications, sleep-disordered breathing, bowel dysfunction, overdose, and mortality. Opioids may potentially affect cancer development. Most consequences of the long-term use of opioids have been identified in studies of patients with non-malignant pain.

CONCLUSION

Studies indicate that long-term use of opioids increases the risk of drug-related events in a significant number of patients. Clinicians should be aware of these complications associated with prescribing opioids, discuss them with patients, prevent complications, if possible, and diagnose them early and manage adequately. More human studies are needed to assess the risk, including trials with individual opioids, because they have different adverse effect profiles.

Factors Affecting Inpatient Mortality and Length of Stay in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of opioid use and other factors on inpatient length of stay (LOS) and mortality among patients hospitalized with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (NMCRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed discharge encounters collected from the 2016 to 2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to evaluate the effect of long-term opioid use (90 d or longer) and cancer-related complications on LOS and mortality among hospitalized patients with NMCRC.

RESULTS

A total of 94,535 patients with NMCRC were included in the analysis. Long-term opioid users had a shorter average LOS and reduced inpatient mortality as compared with nonopioid users (5.97±5.75 vs. 6.66±6.92 d, P<0.01; and adjusted odds ratio=0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.93, respectively). Factors that significantly increased both LOS and mortality included infection, venous thromboembolism, and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; the average LOS was 2.7, 2.6, and 0.7 days longer, and the adjusted odds ratio for risk of inpatient mortality was 3.7, 1.2, and 1.2, respectively (P<0.05), for patients admitted with these cancer-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term opioid use is associated with decreased LOS and inpatient mortality among patients with NMCRC. Individuals admitted for cancer-related complications face a longer LOS and increased mortality as compared with those admitted without these morbidities.

The association between gut microbiome affecting concomitant medication and the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC

Several observational studies suggested that gut microbiome-affecting-medication impairs the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We postulated that if the effectiveness of immunotherapy is affected by drug-related changes of the microbiome, a stronger association between the use of co-medication and overall survival (OS) will be observed in patients treated with immunotherapy as compared to patients treated with chemotherapy. In a retrospective matched cohort study, immunotherapy patients were matched (1:1) to patients treated with chemotherapy in the pre immunotherapy era. The association between the use of antibiotics, opioids, proton pump inhibitors, metformin and other antidiabetics on OS was assessed with multivariable cox-regression analyses. Interaction tests were applied to investigate whether the association differs between patients treated with immuno- or chemotherapy. A total of 442 patients were studied. The use of antibiotics was associated with worse OS (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.39, p = 0.02) independent of the type of therapy (chemotherapy or immunotherapy). The use of opioids was also associated with worse OS (aHR 1.33, p = 0.01). The other drugs studied showed no association with OS. Interaction term testing showed no effect modification by immuno- or chemotherapy for the association of antibiotics and opioids with OS. The use of antibiotics and opioids is similarly associated with worse outcomes in both chemotherapy and immunotherapy treated NSCLC patients. This suggests that the association is likely to be a consequence of confounding rather than disturbing the composition of the microbiome.

Interaction of Opioids with TLR4-Mechanisms and Ramifications

Simple Summary

Recent evidence indicates that opioids can be active at a receptor that is abundantly expressed on innate immune cells as well as cancer cells: the receptor is termed toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). TLR4 is increasingly recognised as playing key roles in tumour biology and anticancer defences. However, the issue of whether TLR4 mediates some of the effects of opioids on tumour growth and metastasis is entirely unknown. We review existing evidence, mechanisms, and functional consequences of the action of opioids at TLR4. This opens new avenues of research on the role of opioids in cancer.

Abstract

The innate immune receptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is known as a sensor for the gram-negative bacterial cell wall component lipopolysaccharide (LPS). TLR4 activation leads to a strong pro-inflammatory response in macrophages; however, it is also recognised to play a key role in cancer. Recent studies of the opioid receptor (OR)-independent actions of opioids have identified that TLR4 can respond to opioids. Opioids are reported to weakly activate TLR4, but to significantly inhibit LPS-induced TLR4 activation. The action of opioids at TLR4 is suggested to be non-stereoselective, this is because OR-inactive (+)-isomers of opioids have been shown to activate or to inhibit TLR4 signalling, although there is some controversy in the literature. While some opioids can bind to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding cleft of the Myeloid Differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) co-receptor, pharmacological characterisation of the inhibition of opioids on LPS activation of TLR4 indicates a noncompetitive mechanism. In addition to a direct interaction at the receptor, opioids affect NF-κB activation downstream of both TLR4 and opioid receptors and modulate TLR4 expression, leading to a range of in vivo outcomes. Here, we review the literature reporting the activity of opioids at TLR4, its proposed mechanism(s), and the complex functional consequences of this interaction.

Perioperative pain, analgesics and cancer-related outcomes: where do we stand?

Cancer-related pain is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms among cancer patients. Undertreated cancer-related pain interferes with daily activities and increases morbidity and mortality. While opioids continue to play an essential role in treating moderate to severe cancer-related pain, they are associated with many adverse effects including misuse. While preclinical and retrospective studies have shown a negative association between opioid use and cancer outcomes, randomized control trials demonstrate that opioid use does not influence cancer recurrence. Additionally, analgesics and adjuvants used for perioperatively or chronic pain control are unlikely to improve oncological outcomes. This article focuses on the pharmacological management of cancer-related pain and offers an overview regarding the use of these medications perioperatively and the cancer outcomes.

Care of the adult cancer patient at the end of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines

•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer. •It details care that is focused on comfort, quality of life and approaching death of patients with advanced cancer. •All recommendations were compiled by a multidisciplinary group of experts. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.

Ethical Dilemma: Healthcare Surrogate Refusal of Opioid Administration

It is morally distressing when a healthcare provider sees patients with undertreated pain but is unable to provide adequate relief because of a surrogate's refusal of such treatment. This issue might occur when there is no clear advanced directive that represents patients' wishes for treatment, and can be further complicated when patients are of minority cultural backgrounds. This article presents a case where the surrogate of a Korean-American woman with severe somatic pain from metastatic pancreatic cancer requested only acetaminophen be given to control the patient's pain. The ethical issues associated with surrogate misconceptions on therapeutic use of opioids are reviewed. This case highlights the ethical dilemma of withholding opioid treatment in a patient with advanced cancer. We conclude that the obligation to treat pain should be understood beyond the authority of surrogate refusal, in favor of patient quality of life, when an advance directive is not in place.

Health-related quality of life and pain with selinexor in patients with advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma

Objective:

Compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of selinexor versus placebo in patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Materials & methods:

HRQoL was assessed at baseline and day 1 of each cycle using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core quality of life questionnaire. Results were reported from baseline to day 169 (where exposure to treatment was maximized while maintaining adequate sample size).

Results:

Pain scores worsened for placebo versus selinexor across all postbaseline visits, although differences in HRQoL at some visits were not significant. Other domains did not exhibit significant differences between arms; however, scores in both arms deteriorated over time.

Conclusion:

Patients treated with selinexor reported lower rates and slower worsening of pain compared with patients who received placebo.

The goal of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with advanced unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma treated with selinexor compared with those treated with placebo. HRQoL was measured prior to treatment initiation and at the first day of each cycle of their treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core quality of life questionnaire. Pain scores worsened for placebo compared with selinexor across all visits after treatment, but differences at some visits were not significant. Other domains did not exhibit significant differences between arms; however, scores in both arms worsened over time reflecting the progressive disease burden in this patient population. As pain is one of the most devastating symptoms associated with advanced and progressing cancers, the significant reduction in pain in the selinexor arm, according to patient perception, represent a relevant added value of this drug in dedifferentiated liposarcoma.