1
|
Pablo C, Matías A, Lavalle Cobo A, Sergio G, Federico RN. Exploring the Interplay between Diabetes and Lp(a): Implications for Cardiovascular Risk. Curr Diab Rep 2024; 24:167-172. [PMID: 38805111 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-024-01543-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The objective of this manuscript is to review and describe the relationship between Lp(a) and diabetes, exploring both their association and synergy as cardiovascular risk factors, while also describing the current evidence regarding the potential connection between low levels of Lp(a) and the presence of diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS Epidemiological studies suggest a potential relationship between low to very low levels of Lp(a) and diabetes. Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), is an intriguing lipoprotein of genetic origin, yet its biological function remains unknown. Elevated levels of Lp(a) are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular atherosclerosis, and coexisting diabetes status confers an even higher risk. On the other hand, epidemiological and genetic studies have paradoxically suggested a potential relationship between low to very low levels of Lp(a) and diabetes. While new pharmacological strategies are being developed to reduce Lp(a) levels, the dual aspects of this lipoprotein's behavior need to be elucidated in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corral Pablo
- Pharmacology and Research Department, FASTA University, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
| | - Arrupe Matías
- Cardiometabolic Unit Coordinator - Hospital Español, Mendoza, Argentina
| | | | | | - Renna Nicolás Federico
- Chief of Coronary Care Unit - Hospital Español de Mendoza- School of Medicine-UNCuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang X, Hu LG, Lei Y, Stolina M, Homann O, Wang S, Véniant MM, Hsu YH. A transcriptomic and proteomic atlas of obesity and type 2 diabetes in cynomolgus monkeys. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112952. [PMID: 37556324 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain major global healthcare challenges, and developing therapeutics necessitates using nonhuman primate models. Here, we present a transcriptomic and proteomic atlas of all the major organs of cynomolgus monkeys with spontaneous obesity or T2D in comparison to healthy controls. Molecular changes occur predominantly in the adipose tissues of individuals with obesity, while extensive expression perturbations among T2D individuals are observed in many tissues such as the liver and kidney. Immune-response-related pathways are upregulated in obesity and T2D, whereas metabolism and mitochondrial pathways are downregulated. Moreover, we highlight some potential therapeutic targets, including SLC2A1 and PCSK1 in obesity as well as SLC30A8 and SLC2A2 in T2D. Our study provides a resource for exploring the complex molecular mechanism of obesity and T2D and developing therapies for these diseases, with limitations including lack of hypothalamus, isolated islets of Langerhans, longitudinal data, and body fat percentage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianglong Zhang
- Center for Research Acceleration by Digital Innovation (CRADI), Amgen Research, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | | - Ying Lei
- Research China, Amgen Research, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Marina Stolina
- Department of Cardiometabolic Disorders, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA
| | - Oliver Homann
- Center for Research Acceleration by Digital Innovation (CRADI), Amgen Research, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Songli Wang
- Research Biomics, Amgen Research, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Murielle M Véniant
- Department of Cardiometabolic Disorders, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA.
| | - Yi-Hsiang Hsu
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02131, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Skoumas I, Andrikou I, Grigoriou K, Dima I, Lazarou E, Vlachopoulos C, Tsioufis K. Lipoprotein(a), metabolic profile and new-onset type 2 diabetes in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: A 9 year follow-up study. J Clin Lipidol 2023; 17:512-518. [PMID: 37321915 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2023.05.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] appears to have an inverse association with the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the general population. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of Lp(a) regarding the development of type 2 diabetes in the special population of subjects with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH). METHODS This cohort study included 474 patients (mean age 49.7±11.3 years, 64% males) with FCH, without diabetes at baseline who were followed for a mean period of 8.2±6.8 years. At baseline evaluation venous blood samples were obtained for the determination of lipid profile and Lp(a) levels. The endpoint of interest was the development of diabetes. RESULTS Patients with increased Lp(a) levels ≥30 mg/dl compared to those with low Lp(a) levels <30 mg/dl had lower levels of triglycerides (238±113 vs 268±129 mg/dl, p = 0.01), greater levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (44±10 vs 41±10 mg/dl, p = 0.01) and hypertension in a greater percentage (42% vs 32%, p = 0.03). The incidence of new-onset diabetes during the follow-up period was 10.1% (n = 48). Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that increased Lp(a) is an independent predictor of lower diabetes incidence (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90, p = 0.02) after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION Among subjects with FCH those with higher Lp(a) levels have lower risk for the development of type 2 diabetes. Moreover, the presence of increased Lp(a) seems to differentiate the expression of metabolic syndrome characteristics in patients with FCH, as increased Lp(a) is related to lower levels of triglycerides, greater prevalence of hypertension and higher levels of HDL cholesterol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Skoumas
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Andrikou
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Kalliopi Grigoriou
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioanna Dima
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Emilia Lazarou
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Charalambos Vlachopoulos
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Tsioufis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang P, Yuan D, Zhang C, Jia S, Song Y, Tang X, Zhao X, Gao R, Xu B, Yuan J. Association between cumulative lipoprotein( a) exposure and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with prediabetes or diabetes. iScience 2023; 26:106117. [PMID: 36879813 PMCID: PMC9984954 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Few studies have characterized long-term exposure to lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), different glucose metabolism status, and their joint role in adverse cardiovascular outcomes risk. We consecutively enrolled 10,724 coronary heart disease (CAD) patients from January to December 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. Associations of cumulative lipoprotein(a) (CumLp(a)) exposure and different glucose metabolism status with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) risk were evaluated using Cox regression models. Compared with participants with normal glucose regulation and lower CumLp(a), those with type 2 diabetes and higher CumLp(a) were at the highest risk (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.25-1.94), and those with prediabetes and higher CumLp(a) and those with type 2 diabetes and lower CumLp(a) were at relatively higher risk (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.76; HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11-1.69; respectively). Similar findings concerning the joint association were observed in sensitivity analyses. Cumulative lipoprotein(a) exposure and different glucose metabolism status were associated with 5-year MACCEs risk and may be useful concurrently for guiding secondary prevention therapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peizhi Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Deshan Yuan
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Ce Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Sida Jia
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Ying Song
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Xiaofang Tang
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Xueyan Zhao
- Special Demand Medical Care Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Runlin Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Bo Xu
- Catheterization Laboratories, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Jinqing Yuan
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ward NC, Watts GF, Bishop W, Colquhoun D, Hamilton-Craig C, Hare DL, Kangaharan N, Kostner KM, Kritharides L, O'Brien R, Mori TA, Nestel PJ, Nicholls SJ, Psaltis PJ, Raffoul N, White HD, Sullivan DR. Australian Atherosclerosis Society Position Statement on Lipoprotein(a): Clinical and Implementation Recommendations. Heart Lung Circ 2023; 32:287-296. [PMID: 36707360 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
This position statement provides guidance to cardiologists and related specialists on the management of adult patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Elevated Lp(a) is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). While circulating Lp(a) levels are largely determined by ancestry, they are also influenced by ethnicity, hormones, renal function, and acute inflammatory events, such that measurement should be done after accounting for these factors. Further, circulating Lp(a) concentrations should be estimated using an apo(a)-isoform independent assay that employs appropriate calibrators and reports the results in molar units (nmol/L). Selective screening strategies of high-risk patients are recommended, but universal screening of the population is currently not advised. Testing for elevated Lp(a) is recommended in all patients with premature ASCVD and those considered to be at intermediate-to-high risk of ASCVD. Elevated Lp(a) should be employed to assess and stratify risk and to enable a decision on initiation or intensification of preventative treatments, such as cholesterol lowering therapy. In adult patients with elevated Lp(a) at intermediate-to-high risk of ASCVD, absolute risk should be reduced by addressing all modifiable behavioural, lifestyle, psychosocial and clinical risk factors, including maximising cholesterol-lowering with statin and ezetimibe and, where appropriate, PCSK9 inhibitors. Apheresis should be considered in patients with progressive ASCVD. New ribonucleic acid (RNA)-based therapies which directly lower Lp(a) are undergoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie C Ward
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
| | - Gerald F Watts
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Lipid Disorders Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - David Colquhoun
- Faculty of Medicine, Wesley Medical Centre, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Christian Hamilton-Craig
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
| | - David L Hare
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia and Department of Cardiology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
| | | | - Karam M Kostner
- Department of Cardiology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Leonard Kritharides
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia and Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard O'Brien
- Austin Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia and Director of Lipid Services, Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Trevor A Mori
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Paul J Nestel
- Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Peter J Psaltis
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Vascular Research Centre, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Department of Cardiology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Harvey D White
- Te Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand, Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Te Toka Tumai, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David R Sullivan
- Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, and Department of Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Elevated triglyceride and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are common in type 2 diabetes, but increased atherogenic particles and dysfunctional HDL are demonstrable in both types 1 and 2 diabetes, contributing to a two-fold increase in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). ASCVD risk accelerates with diabetes duration and severity, aging, risk factors, and risk enhancers. Using statins or other LDL-C-lowering agents if needed in adults with intermediate or greater degrees of risk is recommended. Although hypertriglyceridemia enhances risk, most guidelines do not recommend fibrates or omega 3 fatty acid for risk reduction except for icosapent ethyl in patients with ASCVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald B Goldberg
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1450 Northwest 10th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Importance Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-like particle bound to apolipoprotein(a). This novel marker of cardiovascular disease acts through induction of vascular inflammation, atherogenesis, calcification, and thrombosis. While an absolute risk threshold remains to be universally accepted, an estimated 20% to 25% of the global population have Lp(a) levels of 50 mg/dL or higher, a level noted by the European Atherosclerosis Society to confer increased cardiovascular risk. Observations Compelling evidence from pathophysiological, observational, and genetic studies suggest a potentially causal association between high Lp(a) levels, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Additional evidence has demonstrated that elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with a residual cardiovascular risk despite traditional risk factor optimization, including LDL cholesterol reduction. These findings have led to the formulation of the Lp(a) hypothesis, namely that Lp(a) lowering leads to cardiovascular risk reduction, intensifying the search for Lp(a)-reducing therapies. The ineffectiveness of lifestyle modification, statins, and ezetimibe to lower Lp(a); the modest Lp(a) reduction with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors; the adverse effect profile and unclear cardiovascular benefit of pharmacotherapies such as niacin and mipomersen; and the impracticality of regular lipoprotein apheresis represent major challenges to currently available therapies. Nevertheless, emerging nucleic acid-based therapies, such as the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen and the small interfering RNA olpasiran, are generating interest because of their potent Lp(a)-lowering effects. Assessment of new-onset diabetes in patients achieving very low Lp(a) levels will be important in future trials. Conclusions and Relevance Epidemiologic and genetic studies suggest a potentially causal association between elevated Lp(a) levels, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and aortic valve stenosis. Emerging nucleic acid-based therapies have potent Lp(a)-lowering effects and appear safe; phase 3 trials will establish whether they improve cardiovascular outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddy Duarte Lau
- Department of Medicine, Yale New Haven Health, Bridgeport, Connecticut
| | - Robert P Giugliano
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kostner KM, Kostner GM. Lp(a) and the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on the Lp(a) Paradox in Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is one of the strongest causal risk factors of atherosclerotic disease. It is rich in cholesteryl ester and composed of apolipoprotein B and apo(a). Plasma Lp(a) levels are determined by apo(a) transcriptional activity driven by a direct repeat (DR) response element in the apo(a) promoter under the control of (HNF)4α Farnesoid-X receptor (FXR) ligands play a key role in the downregulation of APOA expression. In vitro studies on the catabolism of Lp(a) have revealed that Lp(a) binds to several specific lipoprotein receptors; however, their in vivo role remains elusive. There are more than 1000 publications on the role of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Lp(a) metabolism; however, the data is often inconsistent and confusing. In patients suffering from Type-I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), provided they are metabolically well-controlled, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are directly comparable to healthy individuals. In contrast, there exists a paradox in T2DM patients, as many of these patients have reduced Lp(a) levels; however, they are still at an increased cardiovascular risk. The Lp(a) lowering mechanism observed in T2DM patients is most probably caused by mutations in the mature-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) gene and possibly other polymorphisms in key transcription factors of the apolipoprotein (a) gene (APOA).
Collapse
|
9
|
Lp(a) and the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on the Lp(a) Paradox in Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23073584. [PMID: 35408941 PMCID: PMC8998850 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is one of the strongest causal risk factors of atherosclerotic disease. It is rich in cholesteryl ester and composed of apolipoprotein B and apo(a). Plasma Lp(a) levels are determined by apo(a) transcriptional activity driven by a direct repeat (DR) response element in the apo(a) promoter under the control of (HNF)4α Farnesoid-X receptor (FXR) ligands play a key role in the downregulation of APOA expression. In vitro studies on the catabolism of Lp(a) have revealed that Lp(a) binds to several specific lipoprotein receptors; however, their in vivo role remains elusive. There are more than 1000 publications on the role of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Lp(a) metabolism; however, the data is often inconsistent and confusing. In patients suffering from Type-I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), provided they are metabolically well-controlled, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are directly comparable to healthy individuals. In contrast, there exists a paradox in T2DM patients, as many of these patients have reduced Lp(a) levels; however, they are still at an increased cardiovascular risk. The Lp(a) lowering mechanism observed in T2DM patients is most probably caused by mutations in the mature-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) gene and possibly other polymorphisms in key transcription factors of the apolipoprotein (a) gene (APOA).
Collapse
|
10
|
Kostner KM, Kostner GM. Lp(a) and the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on the Lp(a) Paradox in Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci 2022. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is one of the strongest causal risk factors of atherosclerotic disease. It is rich in cholesteryl ester and composed of apolipoprotein B and apo(a). Plasma Lp(a) levels are determined by apo(a) transcriptional activity driven by a direct repeat (DR) response element in the apo(a) promoter under the control of (HNF)4α Farnesoid-X receptor (FXR) ligands play a key role in the downregulation of APOA expression. In vitro studies on the catabolism of Lp(a) have revealed that Lp(a) binds to several specific lipoprotein receptors; however, their in vivo role remains elusive. There are more than 1000 publications on the role of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Lp(a) metabolism; however, the data is often inconsistent and confusing. In patients suffering from Type-I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), provided they are metabolically well-controlled, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are directly comparable to healthy individuals. In contrast, there exists a paradox in T2DM patients, as many of these patients have reduced Lp(a) levels; however, they are still at an increased cardiovascular risk. The Lp(a) lowering mechanism observed in T2DM patients is most probably caused by mutations in the mature-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) gene and possibly other polymorphisms in key transcription factors of the apolipoprotein (a) gene (APOA).
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the associations between elevated blood pressure and lipoprotein (a) and possible causal links, as well as data on the prevalence of elevated lipoprotein (a) in a cohort of hypertensive patients. RECENT FINDINGS Elevated lipoprotein (a) is now considered to be an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve disease. Despite this, there are limited data demonstrating an association between elevated lipoprotein (a) and hypertension. Further, there is limited mechanistic data linking lipoprotein (a) and hypertension through either renal impairment or direct effects on the vasculature. Despite the links between lipoprotein (a) and atherosclerosis, there are limited data demonstrating an association with hypertension. Evidence from our clinic suggests that ~ 30% of the patients in this at-risk, hypertensive cohort had elevated lipoprotein (a) levels and that measurement of lipoprotein (a) maybe useful in risk stratification.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ruscica M, Sirtori CR, Corsini A, Watts GF, Sahebkar A. Lipoprotein(a): Knowns, unknowns and uncertainties. Pharmacol Res 2021; 173:105812. [PMID: 34450317 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the last 10 years, there have been advances on several aspects of lipoprotein(a) which are reviewed in the present article. Since the standard immunoassays for measuring lipoprotein(a) are not fully apo(a) isoform-insensitive, the application of an LC-MS/MS method for assaying molar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) has been advocated. Genome wide association, epidemiological, and clinical studies have established high lipoprotein(a) as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the relative importance of molar concentration, apo(a) isoform size or variants within the LPA gene is still controversial. Lipoprotein(a)-raising single nucleotide polymorphisms has not been shown to add on value in predicting ASCVD beyond lipoprotein(a) concentrations. Although hyperlipoproteinemia(a) represents an important confounder in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), it enhances the risk of ASCVD in these patients. Thus, identification of new cases of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) during cascade testing can increase the identification of high-risk individuals. However, it remains unclear whether FH itself increases lipoprotein(a). The ASCVD risk associated with lipoprotein(a) seems to follow a linear gradient across the distribution, regardless of racial subgroups and other risk factors. The inverse association with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes needs consideration as effective lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies are progressing towards the market. Considering that Mendelian randomization analyses have identified the degree of lipoprotein(a)-lowering that is required to achieve ASCVD benefit, the findings of the ongoing outcome trial with pelacarsen will clarify whether dramatically lowering lipoprotein(a) levels can reduce the risk of ASCVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimiliano Ruscica
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
| | - Cesare R Sirtori
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Corsini
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy; IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto S. Giovanni, Milan, Italy
| | - Gerald F Watts
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Lipid Disorders Clinic, Cardiometabolic Services, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Australia
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eckel RH, Bornfeldt KE, Goldberg IJ. Cardiovascular disease in diabetes, beyond glucose. Cell Metab 2021; 33:1519-1545. [PMID: 34289375 PMCID: PMC8411849 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite the decades-old knowledge that diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the reasons for this association are only partially understood. While this association is true for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, different pathophysiological processes may be responsible. Lipids and other risk factors are indeed important, whereas the role of glucose is less clear. This lack of clarity stems from clinical trials that do not unambiguously show that intensive glycemic control reduces cardiovascular events. Animal models have provided mechanisms that link diabetes to increased atherosclerosis, and evidence consistent with the importance of factors beyond hyperglycemia has emerged. We review clinical, pathological, and animal studies exploring the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in humans living with diabetes and in mouse models of diabetes. An increased effort to identify risk factors beyond glucose is now needed to prevent the increased cardiovascular disease risk associated with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Eckel
- Divisions of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, and Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Karin E Bornfeldt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medicine Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ira J Goldberg
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|