Performance of noninvasive scores for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis in morbidly obese with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Diagnostic role of the fibrosis-4 index and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score as a noninvasive tool for liver fibrosis scoring

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by liver fibrosis, which serves as a crucial indicator of its progression and prognosis. Owing to the limitations of biopsy, which is the gold standard for measuring liver fibrosis, a reliable and noninvasive marker is required. We evaluated the diagnostic role of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) in patients with NAFLD with varying severities of liver fibrosis. The FIB-4 index and NFS were calculated using laboratory data from 121 patients who underwent liver biopsies between January 2022 and December 2023. The results were compared with those of the Scheuer scoring system for liver biopsies (F0, F1 + F2, and F3 + F4) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the FIB-4 index and the liver disease fibrosis score in detecting and staging liver fibrosis. Twenty-one patients had advanced fibrosis (F3-F4), and 100 had minimal or mild fibrosis (F0-F2). The degree of liver fibrosis increased with decreased albumin, alanine aminotransferase and platelet count levels, and increasing age. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the FIB-4 index and NFS revealed that the areas under the curve for the FIB-4 index and NFS were 0.895 (95% confidence interval: 0.836-0.954) and 0.882 (95% confidence interval: 0.813-0.952), respectively. The FIB-4 indices showed 95.24% sensitivity at a cutoff point of 1.30, and 85% specificity at a cutoff point of 2.67, while the NFS indices showed 95.24% sensitivity at -1.455 cutoff point and 95% specificity at a cutoff point of 0.676. The FIB-4 index and NFS may replace biopsy for the detection of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.

A Systematic Review of Metabolic Syndrome: Key Correlated Pathologies and Non-Invasive Diagnostic Approaches

Background and Objectives: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a condition marked by a complex array of physiological, biochemical, and metabolic abnormalities, including central obesity, insulin resistance, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia (characterized by elevated triglycerides and reduced levels of high-density lipoproteins). The pathogenesis develops from the accumulation of lipid droplets in the hepatocyte (steatosis). This accumulation, in genetically predisposed subjects and with other external stimuli (intestinal dysbiosis, high caloric diet, physical inactivity, stress), activates the production of pro-inflammatory molecules, alter autophagy, and turn on the activity of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), provoking the low grade chronic inflammation and the fibrosis. This syndrome is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), cardiovascular diseases (CVD), vascular, renal, pneumologic, rheumatological, sexual, cutaneous syndromes and overall mortality, with the risk rising five- to seven-fold for T2DM, three-fold for CVD, and one and a half-fold for all-cause mortality. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine metabolic syndrome as a "systemic disease" and its interaction with major internal medicine conditions such as CVD, diabetes, renal failure, and respiratory failure. It is essential for internal medicine practitioners to approach this widespread condition in a "holistic" rather than a fragmented manner, particularly in Western countries. Additionally, it is important to be aware of the non-invasive tools available for assessing this condition. Materials and Methods: We conducted an exhaustive search on PubMed up to July 2024, focusing on terms related to metabolic syndrome and other pathologies (heart, Lung (COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, OSAS) and kidney failure, vascular, rheumatological (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis), endocrinological, sexual pathologies and neoplastic risks. The review was managed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Finally, we selected 300 studies (233 papers for the first search strategy and 67 for the second one). Our review included studies that provided insights into metabolic syndrome and non-invasive techniques for evaluating liver fibrosis and steatosis. Studies that were not conducted on humans, were published in languages other than English, or did not assess changes related to heart failure were excluded. Results: The findings revealed a clear correlation between metabolic syndrome and all the pathologies above described, indicating that non-invasive assessments of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis could potentially serve as markers for the severity and progression of the diseases. Conclusions: Metabolic syndrome is a multisystem disorder that impacts organs beyond the liver and disrupts the functioning of various organs. Notably, it is linked to a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Non-invasive assessments of hepatic fibrosis and fibrosis allow clinicians to evaluate cardiovascular risk. Additionally, the ability to assess liver steatosis may open new diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic avenues for managing metabolic syndrome and its complications, particularly cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in these patients.

Compare the Combined Diagnostic Accuracy of Transient Elastography and Visual Liver Score in Assessing Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Compare it with Liver Biopsy in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

A liver biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Here, we combine preoperative transient elastography (TE) and intraoperative standardized visual liver score (VLS) which is compared with intraoperative liver biopsy for prediction of NAFLD and NASH in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

AIM

Evaluate the combined diagnostic accuracy of TE and VLS in assessing NAFLD or NASH and compare it with liver biopsy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort of 70 morbidly obese undergoing bariatric surgery, preoperative TE and intraoperative VLS were calculated. Findings of TE and VLS were compared with histology from intraoperative liver biopsy.

RESULTS

Histologically, 44 (62.85%) had NAFLD (≥ S1). Significant steatosis was seen in 20 (28.57%) while significant fibrosis was visible in 18 (25.71%). Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) TE for diagnosis of NAFLD was excellent (0.844, p = 0.001). At the optimal cutoff of 8.1, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 92.9%, and diagnostic accuracy was 90.6%. VLS had a sensitivity of 90.9% for NAFLD. The combined sensitivity of TE + VLS was 95.5% for ruling out NAFLD. Fourteen (20%) had NASH. VLS had a diagnostic accuracy of 97% in identifying NASH in comparison to TE. AUROC-VLS was 0.987, p ≤ 0.001, and a sensitivity of 100%. The overall sensitivity of combined TE and VLS was 100% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%.

CONCLUSION

TE when combined with intraoperative VLS is comparable to liver biopsy and can be used for the diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Accuracy of prognostic serological biomarkers in predicting liver fibrosis severity in people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a meta-analysis of over 40,000 participants

Introduction

A prognostic model to predict liver severity in people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is very important, but the accuracy of the most commonly used tools is not yet well established.

Objective

The meta-analysis aimed to assess the accuracy of different prognostic serological biomarkers in predicting liver fibrosis severity in people with MASLD.

Methods

Adults ≥18 years of age with MASLD were included, with the following: liver biopsy and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio (APRI), fibrosis index-4 (FIB-4), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes score (BARD score), FibroMeter, FibroTest, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF), Forns score, and Hepascore. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model based on the DerSimonian and Laird methods. The study's risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

Results

In total, 138 articles were included, of which 86 studies with 46,514 participants met the criteria for the meta-analysis. The results for the summary area under the receiver operating characteristic (sAUROC) curve, according to the prognostic models, were as follows: APRI: advanced fibrosis (AF): 0.78, any fibrosis (AnF): 0.76, significant fibrosis (SF): 0.76, cirrhosis: 0.72; FIB-4: cirrhosis: 0.83, AF: 0.81, AnF: 0.77, SF: 0.75; NFS: SF: 0.81, AF: 0.81, AnF: 0.71, cirrhosis: 0.69; BARD score: SF: 0.77, AF: 0.73; FibroMeter: SF: 0.88, AF: 0.84; FibroTest: SF: 0.86, AF: 0.78; and ELF: AF: 0.87.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that, when comparing the scores of serological biomarkers with liver biopsies, the following models showed better diagnostic accuracy in predicting liver fibrosis severity in people with MASLD: FIB-4 for any fibrosis, FibroMeter for significant fibrosis, ELF for advanced fibrosis, and FIB-4 for cirrhosis.Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [CRD 42020180525].

Clinical Link between the BARD Score at Diagnosis and Mortality during Follow-Up in Patients with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

This study investigated whether the BARD score at diagnosis could predict all-cause mortality in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). This study included 236 immunosuppressive drug-naïve patients without chronic liver diseases such as viral hepatitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and advanced liver diseases and their clinical data at diagnosis, such as age, sex, and the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS). The BARD score was calculated by the sum of aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio ≥ 0.8 (+2 points), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 28 kg/m2 (+1 point), and the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (+1 point). All-cause mortality was investigated as a poor outcome of AAV. The median age of AAV patients was 60.0 years, and 34.7% were men. Among AAV patients, 7, 50, and 187 scored 1, 1, and 2 points owing to having a BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2, T2DM, and an AST/ALT ratio ≥ 0.8, respectively. Patients with a BARD score ≥ 2 and those with a BARD score ≥ 3 exhibited significantly lower cumulative patient survival rates than those without (p = 0.038 and p = 0.003, respectively). In the multivariable Cox analysis, among the two cut-offs of the BARD scores, only a BARD score ≥ 3 (HR 2.866), along with age (HR 1.061), male sex (HR 2.327), and BVAS (HR 1.100), was independently associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up. In conclusion, this study was the first to demonstrate that the BARD score ≥ 3 at AAV diagnosis could predict all-cause mortality during follow-up in AAV patients.

Fibrosis in Liver and Pancreas: a Review on Pathogenic Significance, Diagnostic Options, and Current Management Strategies

Inflammation is one of the most natural ways of the body's biological response against invading foreign pathogens or injured cells which eventually can lead to a chronic or acute productive response. Fibrosis is an end-stage event associated with an inflammatory response addressed with tissue hardening, discoloration, and most importantly overgrowth of associated tissue. Various organs at different diseased conditions are affected by fibrosis including the liver, pancreas, brain, kidney, and lung. Etiological factors including internal like inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and oxidative stress and external like alcohol and viruses contribute to the development of fibrosis in both the liver and pancreas. More frequently, these organs are associated with pathogenic progression towards fibrosis from acute and chronic conditions and eventually fail in their functions. The pathogenesis of the organ-fibrotic events mainly depends on the activation of residential stellate cells; these cells help to accumulate collagen in respective organs. Various diagnostic options have been developed recently, and various therapeutic options are in trial to tackle fibrosis. In this review, an overview on fibrosis, the pathogenesis of fibrosis in the liver and pancreas, various diagnostic options developed in recent years, and possible present therapeutic measures to overcome options of fibrosis in the liver and pancreas; thus, restoring the functional status of organs is discussed.

SWOT analysis of noninvasive tests for diagnosing NAFLD with severe fibrosis: an expert review by the JANIT Forum

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an advanced form of NAFLD can progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, the prognosis of NAFLD/NASH has been reported to be dependent on liver fibrosis degree. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard, but it has several issues that must be addressed, including its invasiveness, cost, and inter-observer diagnosis variability. To solve these issues, a variety of noninvasive tests (NITs) have been in development for the assessment of NAFLD progression, including blood biomarkers and imaging methods, although the use of NITs varies around the world. The aim of the Japan NASH NIT (JANIT) Forum organized in 2020 is to advance the development of various NITs to assess disease severity and/or response to treatment in NAFLD patients from a scientific perspective through multi-stakeholder dialogue with open innovation, including clinicians with expertise in NAFLD/NASH, companies that develop medical devices and biomarkers, and professionals in the pharmaceutical industry. In addition to conventional NITs, artificial intelligence will soon be deployed in many areas of the NAFLD landscape. To discuss the characteristics of each NIT, we conducted a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis in this study with the 36 JANIT Forum members (16 physicians and 20 company representatives). Based on this SWOT analysis, the JANIT Forum identified currently available NITs able to accurately select NAFLD patients at high risk of NASH for HCC surveillance/therapeutic intervention and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Reliability of Non-invasive Liver Fibrosis Assessment Tools Versus Biopsy in Pre- and Post-bariatric Surgery Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

PURPOSE

Liver biopsy (LBx) remains the gold standard to assess fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Biochemical markers are also useful, but their reliability is not clear in patients with morbid obesity. We assessed the performance of six non-invasive fibrosis assessment tools before and after bariatric surgery (BSx) using LBx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study. LBx was performed at the time of BSx and 12-month post-operatively and assessed using the Brunt system. Clinical and biochemical measurements were collected at the same time points and six non-invasive fibrosis assessment tools were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy patients had BSx; 79.4% female; age was 46.6 ± 9.8 years, and BMI was 48.6 ± 7.5 kg/m². From liver histology, 88% had F0-F2 and 11.2% F3-F4. At BSx, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and FIB-4 had better accuracy (0.86 and 0.88) with specificity of 96.6% and 94.0% and negative predictive values (NPV) of 88.9% and 93.7%. However, sensitivity (6.7% and 40.0%) and positive predictive values (PPV) (20.0% and 46.2%) were low. Twelve months post-surgery (n = 54), 88.9% of patients had F0-F2 and 11.1% had F3-F4. Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) had the best accuracy (0.79 and 0.77) with specificity of 83.7% and 86.9% and NPV of 92.3% and 86.9%. However, sensitivity (25% and 0%) and PPV (12.5% and 0%) were low.

CONCLUSION

Overall, FIB-4, APRI, and NFS showed similar performances with higher accuracy, specificity, and NPV. Sensitivity and PPV were low. These tests are more useful at excluding advanced fibrosis.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Global Burden

The map and global disease burden of chronic liver diseases are markedly changing, with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) becoming the most common cause of liver diseases coinciding with the current epidemics of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Understanding the incidence and prevalence of NAFLD is critical because of its linkage to a significant economic burden of hospitalization and changing patterns in consequences, such as liver transplantation. Moreover, the long-term average health care expenses of NAFLD patients have exceeded those of other liver diseases. To lessen the imminent burden of NAFLD, immediate actions to raise worldwide awareness and address metabolic risk factors are required. This review summarizes key data about the global disease burden of NAFLD, modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, and current preventive approaches.

Subclinical hepatic fibrosis is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction by myocardial perfusion reserve index: a retrospective cohort study

The heart-liver axis is of growing importance. Previous studies have identified independent association of liver dysfunction and fibrosis with adverse cardiac outcomes, but mechanistic pathways remain uncertain. We sought to understand the relations between the degree of hepatic fibrosis identified by the Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) risk score and comprehensive cardiac MRI (CMR) measures of subclinical cardiac disease. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients between 2011 and 2021. We identified consecutive patients who underwent a comprehensive CMR imaging protocol including contrast enhanced with stress/rest perfusion, and lacked pre-existing cardiovascular disease or perfusion abnormalities on CMR. We examined the association of hepatic fibrosis, using the Fib-4 score, with subclinical cardiac disease on CMR while adjusting for cardiometabolic traits. Given known associations of hepatic disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction, we prioritized analyses with the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), a marker of coronary microvascular function. Of the 66 patients in our study cohort, 54 were female (81%) and the mean age was 53.7 ± 15.3 years. We found that higher Fib-4 was associated with reduction in the MPRI (β [SE] - 1.12 [0.46], P = 0.02), after adjusting for cardiometabolic risk factors. Importantly, Fib-4 was not significantly associated with any other CMR phenotypes including measures of cardiac remodeling, inflammation, fibrosis, or dysfunction. We found evidence that hepatic fibrosis associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction, in the absence of overt associations with any other subclinical cardiac disease measures. These findings highlight a potentially important precursor pathway leading to development of subsequent heart-liver disease.

Obesity Modifies the Performance of Fibrosis Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

CONTEXT

Guidelines recommend blood-based fibrosis biomarkers to identify advanced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is particularly prevalent in patients with obesity.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether the degree of obesity affects the performance of liver fibrosis biomarkers in NAFLD.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort study comparing simple fibrosis scores [Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4); NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS); aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index; BARD (body mass index, aspartate-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes); Hepamet Fibrosis Score (HFS)] and newer scores incorporating neo-epitope biomarkers PRO-C3 (ADAPT, FIBC3) or cytokeratin 18 (MACK-3).

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

We recruited overweight/obese patients from endocrinology (n = 307) and hepatology (n = 71) clinics undergoing a liver biopsy [median body mass index (BMI) 40.3 (interquartile range 36.0-44.7) kg/m2]. Additionally, we studied 859 less obese patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD to derive BMI-adjusted cutoffs for NFS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biomarker area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values to identify histological stage ≥F3 fibrosis or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with ≥F2 fibrosis [fibrotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)].

RESULTS

The scores with an AUROC ≥0.85 to identify ≥F3 fibrosis were ADAPT, FIB-4, FIBC3, and HFS. For fibrotic NASH, the best predictors were MACK-3 and ADAPT. The specificities of NFS, BARD, and FIBC3 deteriorated as a function of BMI. We derived and validated new cutoffs for NFS to rule in/out ≥F3 fibrosis in groups with BMIs <30.0, 30.0 to 39.9, and ≥40.0 kg/m2. This optimized its performance at all levels of BMI. Sequentially combining FIB-4 with ADAPT or FIBC3 increased specificity to diagnose ≥F3 fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients, the best-performing fibrosis biomarkers are ADAPT and the inexpensive FIB-4, which are unaffected by BMI. The widely used NFS loses specificity in obese individuals, which may be corrected with BMI-adjusted cutoffs.

SHOULD ROUTINE LIVER BIOPSY BE CONSIDERED IN BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE? AN ANALYSIS OF THE LIMITATIONS OF NON-INVASIVE NAFLD MARKERS

ABSTRACT Background Non-invasive markers are useful and practical tools for assessing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but liver biopsy remains the gold-standard method. Liver biopsy can be easily obtained on individuals undergoing bariatric surgery, but there is no ultimate evidence on the relationship between costs, risks and benefits of its systematic performance. Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods with liver biopsy for detection and staging of NAFLD in obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. Methods This is a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study which enrolled individuals who underwent bariatric surgery from 2018 through 2019 at a public tertiary university hospital. Ultrasound scan, hepatic steatosis index, Clinical Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Score (C-NASH), hypertension, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and insulin resistance (HAIR), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) and body mass index, AST/ALT ratio, and diabetes (BARD) were the methods compared with the histopathological examination of wedge liver biopsies collected during surgery. Results Of 104 individuals analyzed, 91 (87.5%) were female. The mean age was 34.9±9.7 years. There was no biopsy-related morbidity. The respective overall accuracies of each marker analyzed were: ultrasound scan (79.81% for steatosis), hepatic steatosis index (79.81% for steatosis), HAIR (40.23% for steatohepatitis), C-NASH (22.99% for steatohepatitis), APRI (94.23% for advanced fibrosis), NFS (94.23% for advanced fibrosis), and BARD (16.35% for advanced fibrosis). Discussion Given the high prevalence of liver disease within this population, even the most accurate markers did not present enough discretionary power to detect and/or rule out the NAFLD aspects they were designed to assess in comparison with liver biopsy, which is safe and easy to obtain in these patients. Conclusion Wedge liver biopsy during bariatric surgery helps to diagnose and stage NAFLD, presents low risks and acceptable costs; given the limitations of non-invasive methods, it is justifiable and should be considered in bariatric routine.

Diagnostic performance of novel inflammatory biomarkers based on ratios of laboratory indicators for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

INTRODUCTION

There is few effective biomarkers for diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in clinical practice. This study was aimed to investigate the predictive ability of novel inflammatory biomarkers, including the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), for NAFLD.

METHODS

A total of 4465 outpatients diagnosed with NAFLD and 3683 healthy controls were enrolled between May 2016 and November 2021 from the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and anthropometric and laboratory examination data were collected. The two-sample Mann-Whitney U test and binary logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the correlations between four inflammatory biomarkers and NAFLD. The areas under the curves (AUCs) of receiver operating characteristic were used to evaluate their predictive ability for NAFLD.

RESULTS

The MHR, NLR and LMR were higher in patients with NAFLD than in healthy controls (P<0.001), whereas the PLR was remarkably lower (P<0.001). The OR values of the MHR, NLR, PLR, and LMR were 1.599 (1.543-1.658), 1.250 (1.186-1.317), 0.987(0.986-0.988) and 1.111(1.083-1.139), respectively(P<0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, MHR was still the most relevant risk factor for NAFLD compared with other inflammatory markers (P<0.001). The AUCs of the MHR, NLR, PLR, and LMR were as follows: 0.663 (0.651-0.675), 0.524 (0.512-0.537), 0.329 (0.318-0.341), and 0.543 (0.530-0.555), respectively (P<0.001). Furthermore, the diagnostic model combining the MHR with alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, creatinine, uric acid, and body mass index had the best AUC of 0.931 (0.925-0.936).

CONCLUSIONS

MHR was superior to NLR, PLR and LMR as an inflammatory biomarker in the prediction of NAFLD. When combined with relevant laboratory parameters, the MHR may improve the clinical noninvasive diagnosis of NAFLD.

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography and liver fibrosis risk scores in severe obesity

Objective

Identifying significant fibrosis is crucial to evaluate the prognosis and therapeutic interventions in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We assessed the performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography, APRI, FIB-4, Forns, NFS and BARD scores in determining liver fibrosis in severe obesity.

Methods

A prospective study included 108 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Liver biopsy specimens were obtained intraoperatively and classified according to the NAFLD Activity Score. Patients were assessed with serological markers and shear wave velocity of the liver was measured with the Siemens S2000 ultrasound system preoperatively. Optimal cut-off values were determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC).

Results

In the entire cohort prevalence of NAFLD was 80.6%, steatohepatitis 25.9% and significant fibrosis 19.4%. The best tests for predicting significant fibrosis were FIB-4 and Forns scores (both AUROC 0.78), followed by APRI (AUROC 0.74), NFS (AUROC 0.68), BARD (AUROC 0.64) and ARFI (AUROC 0.62). ARFI elastography was successful in 73% of the patients. Higher body mass index (BMI) correlated with invalid ARFI measurements. In patients with BMI < 42 kg/m², ARFI showed 92.3% sensitivity and 82,6% specificity for the presence of significant fibrosis, with AUROC 0.86 and cut-off 1.32 m/s.

Conclusion

FIB-4 and Forns scores were the most accurate for the prediction of significant fibrosis in bariatric patients. Applicability and accuracy of ARFI was limited in individuals with severe obesity. In patients with BMI < 42 kg/m², ARFI elastography was capable for predicting significant fibrosis with relevant accuracy.

PERFORMACE OF TRIGLYCERIDE-GLUCOSE INDEX ON DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF NAFLD IN OBESE PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disease in the world, and its prevalence is increasing alongside obesity. In United States, NAFLD is already the second leading cause of liver transplantation. The spectrum of the disease ranges from simple steatosis, which has a benign course, to steatohepatitis, which may progress to cirrhosis and its complications. The rising of noninvasive methods for diagnosing and staging non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis decreases the need of liver biopsy, as well as the costs and the occurrence of complications related to it.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the performance of the triglyceride-glucose index to evaluate steatosis, NASH and liver fibrosis in obese patients with NAFLD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. Every medical record of patients who were candidates for bariatric surgery at a leading hospital in Southern Brazil were analyzed. The triglyceride-glucose index (TyG Index), a method composed only of two simple laboratory tests (serum triglycerides and fasting glucose levels), was performed prior to surgery. The TyG Index performance regarding the anatomopathological findings was evaluated, and the AUROC curve was calculated to evaluate the best cut-off point for diagnosing steatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis grade. Also, the NAFLD fibrosis Score (NFS) was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients were evaluated. The TyG Index with a cut-off point of 8.76 excluded significant simple steatosis (grade 2-3) in obese patients, with 67.6% sensitivity, 65.1% specificity, 46.3% positive predictive value (PPV), 81.8% negative predictive value (NPV), 65.8% accuracy and 0.66 AUROC (P=0.005). In the evaluation of NASH, the TyG Index with a cut-off point of 8.82 excluded significant NASH (grade 2-3) with 57.3% sensitivity, 58.6% specificity, 33.7% PPV, 78.8% NPV, 58.2% accuracy and 0.58 AUROC (P=0.022). When evaluating liver fibrosis, the TyG Index with a cut-off point of 8.91 showed a sensitivity of 61.8%, a specificity of 62.5%, a PPV of 13.8 and a NPV of 94.4% for exclusion of advanced fibrosis (F3-4), with a 62.4% accuracy and 0.69 AUROC (P<0.001). When analyzing the performance of NFS in the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, the cut-off point <-1.455 excluded advanced fibrosis with sensitivity of 59.4%, specificity of 51%, PPV of 11%, NPV of 92.4% and accuracy of 51.7%. However, the cut-off point of 0.676 to diagnose advanced fibrosis presented sensitivity of 21.9%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 11.7%, NPV of 91.2% and 77.3% accuracy. The AUROC was 0.54 (P=0.480).

CONCLUSION

TyG Index did not perform well in the diagnosis of significant steatosis and NASH. However, it was able to exclude advanced fibrosis in obese patients who are candidates for bariatric surgery.

Therapeutic effects of sleeve gastrectomy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis estimated by paired liver biopsy in morbidly obese Japanese patients

Bariatric surgery has been reported to improve non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is a frequent comorbidity in morbidly obese patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study to estimate the therapeutic effect of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), the most common bariatric surgery in Japan, on obese patients with NASH by comparing the findings of paired liver biopsies.Eleven patients who underwent laparoscopic SG for the treatment of morbid obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2, from March 2015 to June 2019 at Hiroshima University Hospital, Japan, were enrolled. All patients were diagnosed with NASH by liver biopsy before or during SG and were re-examined with a second liver biopsy 1 year after SG. The clinical and histological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed.One year after SG, body weight and BMI were significantly reduced, with median reductions in body weight and BMI of-22 kg and -7.9 kg/m2, respectively. Body fat was also significantly reduced at a median of 13.7%. Liver-related enzymes were also significantly improved. On re-examination by paired liver biopsy, liver steatosis improved in 9 of the 11 patients (81.8%), ruling out of the pathological diagnosis of NASH. However, fibrosis stage did not significantly improve 1 year after SG. The non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score was significantly reduced in 10 of 11 patients (90.9%).Pathological improvement or remission of NASH could be achieved in most morbidly obese Japanese patients 1 year after SG.

FIB-4 First in the Diagnostic Algorithm of Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease in the Era of the Global Metabodemic

The prevalence of obesity or metabolic syndrome is increasing worldwide (globally metabodemic). Approximately 25% of the adult general population is suffering from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which has become a serious health problem. In 2020, global experts suggested that the nomenclature of NAFLD should be updated to metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Hepatic fibrosis is the most significant determinant of all cause- and liver -related mortality in MAFLD. The non-invasive test (NIT) is urgently required to evaluate hepatic fibrosis in MAFLD. The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is the first triaging tool for excluding advanced fibrosis because of its accuracy, simplicity, and cheapness, especially for general physicians or endocrinologists, although the FIB-4 index has several drawbacks. Accumulating evidence has suggested that vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test may become useful as the second step after triaging by the FIB-4 index. The leading cause of mortality in MAFLD is cardiovascular disease (CVD), extrahepatic malignancy, and liver-related diseases. MAFLD often complicates chronic kidney disease (CKD), resulting in increased simultaneous liver kidney transplantation. The FIB-4 index could be a predictor of not only liver-related mortality and incident hepatocellular carcinoma, but also prevalent and incident CKD, CVD, and extrahepatic malignancy. Although NITs as milestones for evaluating treatment efficacy have never been established, the FIB-4 index is expected to reflect histological hepatic fibrosis after treatment in several longitudinal studies. We here review the role of the FIB-4 index in the management of MAFLD.

Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Accurately Exclude Advanced Fibrosis and Are Associated with Higher Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients with NAFLD or Viral Chronic Liver Disease

Liver fibrosis predicts liver-related and cardiovascular outcomes in chronic liver disease patients. We compared the diagnostic performance of various liver fibrosis biomarkers for identifying histological significant/advanced fibrosis. Additionally, the correlations of such liver fibrosis biomarkers with cardiovascular risk (CVR) scores were evaluated. 173 patients with viral hepatitis (157 HCV and 16 HBV) and 107 with a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were consecutively enrolled. Various liver fibrosis biomarkers: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio (ARR), AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FiB-4), Forns index, NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), BARD (body mass index (BMI), AAR, Diabetes) score, and Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS), were used to identify significant/advanced fibrosis. CVR was assessed by using the SCORE, the Progetto CUORE, or the Framingham risk scoring systems. Liver fibrosis biomarkers performed better in predicting advanced rather than significant liver fibrosis in all patients, regardless of chronic liver disease aetiology. Forns index and HFS performed best in predicting advanced fibrosis in patients with viral chronic liver disease and NAFLD. Lower cut-offs of these liver fibrosis biomarkers had high negative predictive values for advanced fibrosis overall, as well as in patients with NAFLD or viral chronic liver disease. FIB-4, Forns index, NFS, and HFS were positively correlated with SCORE and Framingham risk scores. In conclusion, liver fibrosis biomarkers accurately exclude advanced fibrosis and positively correlate with CVR scores in patients with chronic liver disease.

Use of noninvasive scores for advanced liver fibrosis can guide the need for hepatic biopsy during bariatric procedures

BACKGROUND

Patients with obesity are at increased risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The effectiveness of noninvasive screening tests for ruling out advanced fibrosis (stage 3-4) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of advanced fibrosis in patients undergoing routine liver biopsy during bariatric surgery and assess the effectiveness of existing noninvasive risk calculators.

SETTING

Academic medical center in the United States.

METHODS

Routine liver biopsies were obtained during first-time bariatric surgery (January 2001-December 2017). Patient demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and preoperative laboratory values were compiled. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were compared between 3 noninvasive risk calculators for advanced fibrosis: the fibrosis-4 index, NAFLD fibrosis score, and aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI).

RESULTS

Among 2465 patients, the prevalence of advanced fibrosis (stage 3-4) was 3.4%. The mean age was 45.5 years, and the mean body mass index was 46.8. The sensitivity of noninvasive risk calculators ranged from 85% (NAFLD fibrosis score) to 24% (APRI). The NAFLD fibrosis score performed best in screening out advanced fibrosis, with an NPV of 99%. The PPV ranged from 9% to 65%. In this study cohort, the use of the NALFD fibrosis score correctly ruled out advanced fibrosis in 893 (36%) patients, with 13 false negatives.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of advanced fibrosis in individuals undergoing routine first-time bariatric procedures is 3.4%. Use of the NALFD fibrosis score can rule out advanced fibrosis in one-third of this population, and guide surgical decision-making.

Evaluation of NAFLD and fibrosis in obese patients - a comparison of histological and clinical scoring systems

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a frequent condition in obese patients and regularly progresses to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and subsequent cirrhosis. Histologic evaluation is the gold standard for grading and staging, but invasive biopsies are associated with obvious risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate different non-invasive tools for screening of NAFLD and fibrosis in obese patients.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study liver specimens of 141 patients were taken during bariatric surgery. Serological parameters and clinical data were collected and the following scores calculated: NASH clinical scoring system (NCS), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4 as well as NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Liver function capacity was measured preoperatively by LiMAx test (enzymatic capacity of cytochrome P450 1A2). Intraoperative liver biopsies were classified using NAFLD activity score (NAS) and steatosis, activity and fibrosis (SAF) score.

Results

APRI was able to differentiate between not NASH and definite NASH with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 67% (AUROC 0.76). LiMAx and NCS also showed significant differences between not NASH and definite NASH. No significant differences were found for NFS and Fib-4. APRI had a high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (76%) in distinguishing fibrosis from no fibrosis (AUROC = 0.81). NCS and Fib-4 also revealed high AUROCs (0.85 and 0.67), whereas LiMAx and NFS did not show statistically significant differences between fibrosis stages. Out of the patients with borderline NASH in the histologic NAS score, 48% were classified as NASH by SAF score.

Conclusions

APRI allows screening of NAFLD as well as fibrosis in obese patients. This score is easy to calculate and affordable, while conveniently only using routine clinical parameters. Using the NAS histologic scoring system bears the risk of underdiagnosing NASH in comparison to SAF score.

Hepatocyte fraction: correlation with noninvasive liver functional biomarkers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the correlation between HeF obtained from gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and clinical biomarkers for the assessment of liver function.

METHODS

This prospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained from the patients. We recruited 48 patients carrying a known or suspected liver disease to undergo gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. The new model of the HeF was calculated from ΔR1 values of the liver and spleen. The HeF, quantitative liver-to-spleen contrast ratio (Q-LSC), and ΔT1 value (the reduction rate of the T1 value between the pre- and post-contrast images) were compared with the Child-Pugh and end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients, 40 were in Child-Pugh class A and 8 were in class B. The median HeF (P = 0.0001), Q-LSC (P = 0.015), and ΔT1 value (P = 0.0023) in patients in Child-Pugh class A were significantly higher than those in class B. The sensitivities, specificities, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves for differentiating Child-Pugh class A and B were 95.0%, 87.5%, and 0.93 in the HeF; 77.5%, 75.0%, and 0.78 in the Q-LSC; and 57.5%, 100.0%, and 0.84 in the ΔT1 value, respectively. The HeF was significantly correlated with Child-Pugh (r = - 0.58, P < 0.0001) and MELD score (r = - 0.57, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The HeF was well correlated with Child-Pugh and MELD score and could be a new biomarker to assess liver function.