Comparative Effectiveness of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

Adalimumab vs Infliximab in Luminal Pediatric Crohn's Disease: Comparable Outcomes in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

This study compared real-world effectiveness between adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in children with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

Children enrolled into the prospective Canadian Children Inflammatory Bowel Disease Network National Inception Cohort between 2014 and 2020 who commenced ADA or IFX as first antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent for luminal CD were included. Multivariate logistic regression modeled the propensity of commencing ADA; propensity score matching was used to match IFX-treated children to ADA-treated children. The primary outcome at 1 year was steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR). Secondary outcomes at 1 year were (i) combined SFCR and C-reactive protein remission, (ii) treatment intensification, and (iii) anti-TNF durability. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratio adjusted for concomitant immunomodulator use with 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported.

RESULTS

In the propensity score-matched cohort of 147 ADA-treated and 147 IFX-treated children, 92 (63%) ADA-treated and 87 (59%) IFX-treated children achieved SFCR at 1 year (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.4); 75 of 140 (54%) ADA-treated and 85 of 144 (59%) IFX-treated children achieved combined SFCR and C-reactive protein remission (adjusted OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.6). ADA-treated children less frequently underwent treatment intensification (21 [14%]) compared with IFX-treated children (69 [47%]) ( P < 0.0001). Discontinuation of anti-TNF occurred in 18 (12%) ADA-treated and 15 (10%) IFX-treated children (adjusted hazard ratio 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.2).

DISCUSSION

Children with CD achieved favorable outcomes at 1 year with either ADA or IFX as first anti-TNF agents. Those receiving IFX did not have significantly superior outcomes compared with clinically similar children receiving ADA.

Sustainability of biologic treatment in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease: population-based registry analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the predictors of sustainability of biologic drugs for paediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

The Czech National Prospective Registry of Biologic and Targeted Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CREdIT) was used to identify the biologic treatment courses in paediatric patients with CD. Mixed-effects Cox models and propensity score analyses were employed to evaluate predictors of treatment sustainability.

RESULTS

Among the 558 observations of 473 patients, 264 were treated with adalimumab (47%), 240 with infliximab (43%), 41 with ustekinumab (7%), and 13 with vedolizumab (2%). Multivariable analysis revealed higher discontinuation risk with infliximab compared to adalimumab (HR = 0.600, 95%CI 0.389-0.926), both overall and in first-line treatment (HR = 0.302, 95%CI 0.103-0.890). Infliximab versus adalimumab was associated with shorter time to escalation (HR = 0.094, 95%CI 0.043-0.203). Propensity-score analysis demonstrated lower sustainability of infliximab (HR = 0.563, 95%CI 1.159-2.725). The time since diagnosis to treatment initiation (HR = 0.852, 95%CI 0.781-0.926) was the most important predictor. Baseline immunosuppressive therapy prolonged sustainability with infliximab (HR = 2.899, 95%CI 1.311-6.410).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the results suggesting shorter sustainability, the need for earlier intensification and thus higher drug exposure, and the greater need for immunosuppression with infliximab than with adalimumab, the choice of these drugs cannot be considered completely equitable.

IMPACT

Our study identified predictors of sustainability of biologic treatment in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease, including adalimumab (versus infliximab), early initiation of biologic treatment, and normalised baseline haemoglobin levels. Infliximab treatment was associated with earlier intensification, higher drug exposure, and a greater need for immunosuppression. Parents and patients should be fully informed of the disadvantages of intravenous infliximab versus adalimumab during the decision-making process. This study emphasises the importance of not delaying the initiation of biologic therapy in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease.

Physicochemical characterization and functionality comparison of Humira®(adalimumab), Remicade®(infliximab) and Simponi Aria®(golimumab)

FDA-approved anti-TNFα biopharmaceuticals are successful in treating a range of autoimmune diseases. However, not all anti-TNFα products are identical in their patient outcomes, suggesting that there may be product-specific differences stemming from protein structural differences, doses and routes of administration. In this work, we focus only on structural and functional differences across three full-length anti-TNFα mAbs (Humira®, Remicade®, and Simponi Aria®) to better understand the implications of such differences on the products' efficacy. For structural characterization, we quantified N-glycans using mass spectrometry and fluorescence labeling. From these studies, we observed that Remicade® had the highest percent of afucosylated glycans (15.5 ± 1.3 %) and the largest number of unique glycans, 28. While Humira® had the fewest unique glycans, 15, and 11.4 ± 0.8 % of afucosylated, high-mannose glycans. For the functional studies we tested TNFα binding via ELISA, FcγRIIIa binding via AlphaLISA and effector function using an ADCC bioreporter assay. Humira® had a significantly lower EC50 (1.9 ± 0.1 pM) for ELISA and IC50 (10.5 ± 1.1 nM) for AlphaLISA, suggesting that Humira® has higher TNFα and FcγRIIIa binding affinity than Remicade® and Simponi Aria®. Humira® was also the most potent in the bioreporter assay with an EC50 value of 0.55 ± 0.03 nM compared to Remicade® (0.64 ± 0.04 nM) and Simponi Aria® (0.67 ± 0.03 nM). This comparison is significant as it highlights functional differences between mAbs with shared mechanisms of action when examined in a single laboratory and under one set of conditions.

Vedolizumab and Adalimumab in Biologic-Naïve Ulcerative Colitis: Comparison of Patient-Level Clinical Trial Data and VARSITY for Week 6 Clinical Remission

BACKGROUND

Indirect treatment comparisons using patient-level data are increasing in popularity within inflammatory bowel disease research. We compared the efficacy of adalimumab and vedolizumab for biologic-naïve moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) using indirect comparisons of phase 3 clinical trials and compared the results to the RCT VARSITY.

DESIGN

Pooled analysis of patient-level data from 518 biologic-naïve patients with UC was performed using GEMINI-1 and ULTRA-1. Proportions of patients achieving week 6 clinical remission and clinical response were compared, and propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression were used to account for potential confounders. These results were compared to those derived from VARSITY.

RESULTS

A numerically greater proportion of vedolizumab-treated patients from GEMINI-1 achieved week 6 clinical remission compared to those treated with adalimumab [136/388 (35.1%) vs. 38/130 (29.2%)]. Similar findings were observed among the propensity score matched cohort [33/110 (30.0%) vs. 25/110 (22.7%), adjusted OR (aOR) 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-3.02), p = 0.187]. A similar magnitude for absolute difference in the proportions of patients achieving week 6 clinical remission was observed from VARSITY in vedolizumab compared to adalimumab [131/305 (43.0%) vs. 114/307 (37.1%), OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.92-1.76), p = 0.142].

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis, a similar magnitude in the absolute difference of efficacy at week 6 among biologic-naïve patients was observed using indirect comparisons of phase 3 clinical trial data as was observed in VARSITY. Indirect comparisons using patient-level clinical trial data could be used to inform drug choices for future head-to-head trials and guide positioning of drugs in the absence of head-to-head trials.

Continuous clinical remission with biologics in ulcerative colitis: the 'AURORA' comparison study

OBJECTIVES

Comparative trials among biological drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) provided conflicting results. After patent expire of infliximab originator, adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab and vedolizumab have been approved in Italy.We compared the efficacy of these four biologics in UC according to the concept of continuous clinical remission (CCR).

METHODS

In a retrospective, multicentre study, all UC patients treated with adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab or vedolizumab between 2014 and 2019 were included. All drugs were compared to each other according to the 1-year CCR rate, defined as Mayo partial score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, without any relapse or optimization with dose escalation, topical treatments or steroid use after first clinical remission.

RESULTS

Four-hundred sixteen patients (adalimumab = 90, infliximab biosimilar = 105, golimumab = 79, vedolizumab = 142) were included. CCR was achieved in similar percentages among the groups (33%, 37%, 28%, 37%, respectively). All drugs were equivalent in biologic-naive patients, while vedolizumab was better than a second anti-TNFα in prior anti-TNFα agent failures. No differences were found according to type of adverse events or severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year. Changing to vedolizumab is more effective than switching to another anti-TNFα in TNFα failures.

Identifying surrogate markers in real-world comparative effectiveness research

In comparative effectiveness research (CER), leveraging short-term surrogates to infer treatment effects on long-term outcomes can guide policymakers evaluating new treatments. Numerous statistical procedures for identifying surrogates have been proposed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but no methods currently exist to evaluate the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained by surrogates in real-world data (RWD), which have become increasingly common. To address this knowledge gap, we propose inverse probability weighted (IPW) and doubly robust (DR) estimators of an optimal transformation of the surrogate and the corresponding PTE measure. We demonstrate that the proposed estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal, and the DR estimator is consistent when either the propensity score model or outcome regression model is correctly specified. Our proposed estimators are evaluated through extensive simulation studies. In two RWD settings, we show that our method can identify and validate surrogate markers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Anti-TNF-α agents for refractory intestinal Behçet's disease: case series and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Behçet's disease (BD) is a relapsing systemic immune disorder, and intestinal BD is a significant cause of mortality in patients with BD. Conventional therapeutic strategies for intestinal BD showed unsatisfactory outcomes, especially in those patients with refractory subtypes. In recent years, biologic agents have exhibited promising results in this field. While the sample sizes of existing studies were limited, the results were heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to observe the efficacy of different biologics in clinical symptomatic improvement and intestinal mucosal healing.

DESIGN

This is a study including the report of case series and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Free-text words and subject terms, including 'Behcet's Syndrome', 'Biologics', 'Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist', were used to systematically research the relevant studies in the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library). All retrieved articles were from inception to July 2021, and the data from our institution were also included in this meta-analysis. A double arcsine transformation was performed to stabilize the variance of the original ratio. Heterogeneity was evaluated via Q-test and I ² statistics. Random-effects or fixed-effects model was used to calculate the pooled parameters, and the results were presented as forest plots with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, but only antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents were prescribed as biologicals for refractory intestinal BD. The symptom improvement rates at our institution ranged from 57.1 to 81.8%, and the mucosal healing rates were from 20 to 60% in different therapeutic periods. A total of 514 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis, and the synthesized ratios showed that 59.8% (n = 377) and 73.7% (n = 317) of patients who received maintenance therapy with anti-TNF-α agents could achieve clinical symptomatic improvement during short-term (10-14 weeks) and long-term (48-54 weeks) periods, respectively. Furthermore, 77.8% (n = 229) of patients with intestinal BD maintained therapeutic efficacy for a longer time (100 weeks). In addition, 60.9% (n = 120) of the patients achieved sustained intestinal mucosal healing during a long-term follow-up (24-52 weeks).

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF-α treatment is effective in treating refractory intestinal BD but more studies are required to evaluate the effects of new biologics for intestinal BD in the near future.

REGISTRATION

This study has been registered on PROSPERO, the ID is CRD42022329211.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Anti-TNF-α agents are effective and safe in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease Behçet's disease (BD) is a disease affecting several organs including the gastrointestinal tract. Nowadays, the efficacy of existing therapy strategies is still unsatisfactory and some patients are suffering from repeated attacks of the disease. We noticed that a new kind of medicine, called antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents, was applied to these patients recently. The therapeutic efficacy is not convincing enough to evaluate since the number of patients receiving this new medicine was small in every individual study. Regarding this, we conducted a research to learn about the efficacy of this medicine at our own institution. Besides, we composed the results of other studies in an appropriate way. Then, we drew a conclusion on the exact efficacy of anti-TNF-α agents after the data analysis. We unveiled that the anti-TNF-α agents appeared both effective and safe in the management of intestinal BD patients when the classical therapy failed. More than half of the patients could achieve discomfort remission when they got the therapy of the new medicine at our institution. We also found that intestinal ulcers in most patients improved after they received the treatment. All in all, it offered another foothold for getting relief in these patients who were caught in this mire.

Polysaccharides from Garlic Protect against Liver Injury in DSS-Induced Inflammatory Bowel Disease of Mice via Suppressing Pyroptosis and Oxidative Damage

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a widespread intestinal disease threatening human health, is commonly accompanied by secondary liver injury (SLI). Pyroptosis and oxidative stress act as an important role underlying the pathophysiology of SLI, during which a large number of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative intermediates can be produced, thereby causing the liver severely damaged. Suppression of pyroptosis and oxidative damage can be considered one of the critical strategies for SLI therapy. Garlic, a natural food with eatable and medicinal functions, is widely used in people's daily life. There is no study about the alleviation of garlic against IBD accompanied with SLI. This study is aimed at investigating the efficacy of the polysaccharides from garlic (PSG) in treating IBD and SLI, as well as its pharmacological mechanism. The results showed that PSG significantly alleviated dextran sulfate sodium-induced IBD determined by evaluating the bodyweight loss, disease activity index, colon length, and colonic pathological examination of mice. PSG significantly reduced the colonic inflammation by reversing the levels of myeloperoxidase, diamine oxidase activity, iNOS, and COX2 and strengthened the intestinal barrier by increasing the expressions of ZO1, occludin, and MUC2 of IBD mice. Furthermore, PSG strongly alleviated SLI determined by assessing the liver morphological change, liver index, levels of ALT and AST, and liver pathological change of mice. Mechanically, PSG reduced the high levels of LPS, IL-1β, IL18, NLRP3, gasdermin D, caspase 1, ASC, TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB, phospho-NF-κB, while it increased IL-10 in the livers of mice, indicating that PSG alleviated SLI by suppressing inflammation and pyroptosis. Additionally, PSG significantly inhibited the oxidative damage in the liver tissues of SLI mice by reducing the levels of ROS, MDA, Keap-1, 8-OHDG, and phospho-H2AX and increasing the levels of GPX4, SOD2, HO1, NQO1, and Nrf2. These findings suggested that the garlic polysaccharides could be used to treat IBD accompanied with SLI in humans.

Comparative Efficacy and Rapidity of Action for Infliximab vs Ustekinumab in Biologic Naïve Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Comparative effectiveness has become increasingly important to help position therapies for inflammatory bowel disease. We compared the efficacy and rapidity of onset of action of infliximab vs ustekinumab induction therapy for moderate to severe biologic-naïve Crohn's disease (CD) using patient-level data from randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of 2 large CD clinical trial programs that included data on 420 biologic-naïve CD patients. Differences in proportions of patients achieving week 6 clinical remission, clinical response, and normalization of calprotectin were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using propensity scores to create a cohort of matched participants with similar distribution of baseline covariates.

RESULTS

At week 6, a comparable number of patients achieved clinical remission with infliximab compared with patients treated with ustekinumab (44.9% vs 37.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.79-1.89). Similarly, at week 6 the clinical response rates were not significantly different (58.4% infliximab vs 54.9% ustekinumab; aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.82-1.90). No significant difference was observed between treatment groups for achieving a week 6 fecal calprotectin level less than 250 mcg/L in those with increased values at baseline (42.3% infliximab vs 34.7% ustekinumab; aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.79-2.28). Similar results were seen for all analyses performed within the propensity matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this post hoc analysis, infliximab and ustekinumab appear to have similar efficacy and speed of onset in patients with CD who are biologic-naïve.

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics for Endoscopic Healing of the Ileum and Colon in Crohn's Disease

INTRODUCTION

We compared the efficacy of adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab on the ability to achieve endoscopic healing (EH) after 1 year of therapy in moderate-severe Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

This was a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 299 patients with CD from 4 clinical trials. Proportions of patients treated with each biologic were compared for achieving 1-year complete EH (Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD] <3) and ileal and colonic EH separately (SES-CD = 0). Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the relationship between biologics and 1-year outcomes and adjusted for disease duration, concomitant corticosteroid use, and prior antitumor necrosis factor failure.

RESULTS

Compared with vedolizumab (4/56 [7.1%]), adalimumab (17/61 [27.9%], adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 5.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-18.95, P = 0.004) and infliximab (39/141 [27.7%], aOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 1.48-14.22, P = 0.008) had superior rates of 1-year EH. No significant difference was observed between vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Similar results were observed among biologic-naive patients. Among patients with baseline ileal SES-CD ≥3, no significant differences were observed between biologics for 1-year ileal EH. However, for large (>0.5 cm) ileal ulcers, infliximab (20/49 [40.8%]) had superior rates of no ileal ulcers compared with vedolizumab (2/23 [8.7%], aOR: 5.39, 95% CI: 1.03-28.05, P = 0.045). No other differences were observed. For colonic disease, compared with ustekinumab (9/31 [29.0%]), adalimumab (30/48 [62.5%], aOR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.45-10.90, P = 0.007) had superior rates of 1-year EH in the colon, with similar trends observed for infliximab (55/105 [52.4%], aOR: 2.08, 95% CI: 0.82-5.27, P = 0.121). No other differences were observed.

DISCUSSION

In this post hoc analysis, TNF-α antagonists were overall superior to vedolizumab and ustekinumab for achieving 1-year EH in moderate-severe CD patients.

Adalimumab vs Infliximab in Pediatric Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score Analysis and Predictors of Treatment Escalation

INTRODUCTION

Two antitumor necrosis factor therapies (infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA]) have been approved for the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and IFX by propensity score matching in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with luminal CD and at least a 24-month follow-up.

METHODS

Among 100 patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria, and 62 were matched by propensity score. We evaluated time to treatment escalation as the primary outcome and primary nonresponse, predictors of treatment escalation and relapse, serious adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and effect of concomitant immunomodulators as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no difference between ADA and IFX in time to treatment escalation (HR = 0.63 [95% CI 0.31-1.28] P = 0.20), primary nonresponse (P = 0.95), or serious adverse events. The median (interquartile range) trough levels at the primary outcome were 14.05 (10.88-15.40) and 6.15 (2.08-6.58) µg/mL in the ADA and IFX groups, respectively. On a multivariate analysis, the combination of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity was a strong independent predictor of treatment escalation (HR 5.19, [95% CI 2.41-11.18], P < 0.0001). The simple endoscopic score for CD, L3 disease phenotype, and use of concomitant immunomodulators for at least the first 6 months revealed a trend toward significance on a univariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

Propensity score matching did not reveal substantial differences in efficacy or safety between ADA and IFX. The anti-S. cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity combination is a strong predictor of treatment escalation.

Translating Treg Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Humanized Mice

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans, afflicted in genetically predisposed individuals due to dysregulated immune response directed against constituents of gut flora. The defective immune responses mounted against the regulatory mechanisms amplify and maintain the IBD-induced mucosal inflammation. Therefore, restoring the balance between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory immunepathways in the gut may contribute to halting the IBD-associated tissue-damaging immune response. Phenotypic and functional characterization of various immune-suppressive T cells (regulatory T cells; Tregs) over the last decade has been used to optimize the procedures for in vitro expansion of these cells for developing therapeutic interventional strategies. In this paper, we review the mechanisms of action and functional importance of Tregs during the pathogenesis of IBD and modulating the disease induced inflammation as well as role of mouse models including humanized mice repopulated with the human immune system (HIS) to study the IBD. "Humanized" mouse models provide new tools to analyze human Treg ontogeny, immunobiology, and therapy and the role of Tregs in developing interventional strategies against IBD. Overall, humanized mouse models replicate the human conditions and prove a viable tool to study molecular functions of human Tregs to harness their therapeutic potential.

Differences in Biologic Utilization and Surgery Rates in Pediatric and Adult Crohn's Disease: Results From a Large Electronic Medical Record-derived Cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic illness that affects both the pediatric and adult populations with an increasing worldwide prevalence. We aim to identify a large, single-center cohort of patients with CD using natural language processing (NLP) in combination with codified data and extract surgical rates and medication usage from the electronic medical record (EMR).

METHODS

Patients with CD were identified from the entire Cleveland Clinic EMR using ICD codes and CD-specific terms identified by NLP to fit a logistic regression model. Cohorts were developed for pediatric-onset (younger than 18 years) and adult-onset (18 years and older) CD. Surgeries were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and NLP. Crohn's disease-related medications were extracted using physician orders in the EMR.

RESULTS

Patients with pediatric-onset (n = 2060) and adult-onset (n = 4973) CD were identified from 2000 to 2017 with a positive predictive value of 98.5%. Rate of CD-related abdominal surgery over time was significantly higher in adult-onset compared with pediatric-onset CD (10-year surgery rate 49.9% vs 37.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). Treatment with biologics was significantly higher in pediatric vs adult-onset CD cohorts (63.6% vs 49.2%; P < 0.001). The overall rate of CD-related abdominal surgery was significantly higher in those who received <6 months of a biologic compared with ≥6 months of a biologic for both cohorts (pediatric 64.1% vs 39.1%, P ≤ 0.001; adult 69.3% vs 56.5%, P ≤ 0.001). Additionally, 60.9% in pediatric-onset CD and 43.5% in adult-onset CD treated with ≥6 months of biologic therapy have not required abdominal surgery. On multivariable analysis, perianal surgery was a significant risk factor for abdominal surgery in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We used a combination of codified and NLP data to establish the largest, North American, single-center EMR cohort of pediatric- and adult-onset CD patients and determined that biologics are associated with lower rates of surgery over time, potentially altering the natural history of the disease.

Robust and efficient semi-supervised estimation of average treatment effects with application to electronic health records data

We consider the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) in a semi-supervised learning setting, where a very small proportion of the entire set of observations are labeled with the true outcome but features predictive of the outcome are available among all observations. This problem arises, for example, when estimating treatment effects in electronic health records (EHR) data because gold-standard outcomes are often not directly observable from the records but are observed for a limited number of patients through small-scale manual chart review. We develop an imputation-based approach for estimating the ATE that is robust to misspecification of the imputation model. This effectively allows information from the predictive features to be safely leveraged to improve efficiency in estimating the ATE. The estimator is additionally doubly-robust in that it is consistent under correct specification of either an initial propensity score model or a baseline outcome model. It is also locally semiparametric efficient under an ideal semi-supervised model where the distribution of the unlabeled data is known. Simulations exhibit the efficiency and robustness of the proposed method compared to existing approaches in finite samples. We illustrate the method by comparing rates of treatment response to two biologic agents for treatment inflammatory bowel disease using EHR data from Partners' Healthcare.

Linking bacterial enterotoxins and alpha defensin 5 expansion in the Crohn's colitis: A new insight into the etiopathogenetic and differentiation triggers driving colonic inflammatory bowel disease

Evidence link bacterial enterotoxins to apparent crypt-cell like cells (CCLCs), and Alpha Defensin 5 (DEFA5) expansion in the colonic mucosa of Crohn's colitis disease (CC) patients. These areas of ectopic ileal metaplasia, positive for Paneth cell (PC) markers are consistent with diagnosis of CC. Retrospectively, we: 1. Identified 21 patients with indeterminate colitis (IC) between 2000-2007 and were reevaluation their final clinical diagnosis in 2014 after a followed-up for mean 8.7±3.7 (range, 4-14) years. Their initial biopsies were analyzed by DEFA5 bioassay. 2. Differentiated ulcer-associated cell lineage (UACL) analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of the CC patients, stained for Mucin 6 (MUC6) and DEFA5. 3. Treated human immortalized colonic epithelial cells (NCM460) and colonoids with pure DEFA5 on the secretion of signatures after 24hr. The control colonoids were not treated. 4. Treated colonoids with/without enterotoxins for 14 days and the spent medium were collected and determined by quantitative expression of DEFA5, CCLCs and other biologic signatures. The experiments were repeated twice. Three statistical methods were used: (i) Univariate analysis; (ii) LASSO; and (iii) Elastic net. DEFA5 bioassay discriminated CC and ulcerative colitis (UC) in a cohort of IC patients with accuracy. A fit logistic model with group CC and UC as the outcome and the DEFA5 as independent variable differentiator with a positive predictive value of 96 percent. IHC staining of CC for MUC6 and DEFA5 stained in different locations indicating that DEFA5 is not co-expressed in UACL and is therefore NOT the genesis of CC, rather a secretagogue for specific signature(s) that underlie the distinct crypt pathobiology of CC. Notably, we observed expansion of signatures after DEFA5 treatment on NCM460 and colonoids cells expressed at different times, intervals, and intensity. These factors are key stem cell niche regulators leading to DEFA5 secreting CCLCs differentiation 'the colonic ectopy ileal metaplasia formation' conspicuously of pathogenic importance in CC.

Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in 1,488 Biologic-Naive Korean Patients with Crohn's Disease

Background/Aims

Data on the comparative effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) are rare, particularly for Asian patients. We compared the key clinical outcomes (surgery, hospitalization, and corticosteroid use) of use of these two drugs in biologic-naive Korean patients with CD.

Methods

Using National Health Insurance claims, we collected data on patients who were diagnosed with CD and exposed to IFX or ADA between 2010 and 2016.

Results

We included 1,488 new users of biologics (1,000 IFX users and 488 ADA users). Over a median follow-up period of 2.1 years after starting biological therapy, no significant differences were found between IFX and ADA users in the risks for surgery (ADA vs IFX adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.84), hospitalization (aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.28), and corticosteroid use (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.19). These results were unchanged even when only patients who used biologics for over 6 months were analyzed (aHR [95% CI] surgery, 1.31 [0.82 to 2.11]; hospitalization, 1.02 [0.80 to 1.30]; corticosteroid use, 0.80 [0.54 to 1.18]). Additionally, these results were unchanged in patients treated with biologics as monotherapy or in combination with immunomodulators.

Conclusions

In this nationwide population-based study, no significant difference was found in the long-term effectiveness of IFX and ADA in the real-world setting of biologic-naive Korean patients with CD. In the absence of trials to directly compare IFX and ADA, our study indicates that the selection of one of these two biologics can be determined by patient and/or physician preference.

Clinical Practice of Adalimumab and Infliximab Biosimilar Treatment in Adult Patients With Crohn's Disease

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors has significantly changed the treatment landscape in Crohn's disease (CD). The overall therapeutic achievements with TNF inhibitors such as infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol paved the way to push the boundaries of treatment goals beyond symptomatic relief and toward cessation of objective signs of inflammation, including endoscopic remission. Even though these agents are widely used for the treatment of moderate to severe CD, heterogeneity still exists in translating evidence-based guidelines on the use of anti-TNF agents into actual treatment algorithms in CD. This might be due to several reasons including disparities in health expenditure policies; lack of harmonization between countries; and variations in assessment of disease severity, use of disease monitoring tools, or application of treatment targets by physicians. With the advent of biosimilars, patent-free versions of reference biologics are now available to minimize health inequalities in drug availability. In this context, this article aims to provide practical clinical guidance for the use of infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars in patients with moderate to severe CD by outlining different clinical scenarios that patients may encounter during their treatment journey.

Cytokine release syndrome: inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines as a solution for reducing COVID-19 mortality

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) reached pandemic proportions at the beginning of 2020 and continues to be a worldwide concern. End organ damage and acute respiratory distress syndrome are the leading causes of death in severely or critically ill patients. The elevated cytokine levels in severe patients in comparison with mildly affected patients suggest that cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurs in the severe form of the disease. In this paper, the significant role of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha, and their mechanism of action in the CRS cascade is explained. Potential therapeutic approaches involving anti-IL-6 and anti-TNF-alpha antibodies to fight COVID-19 and reduce mortality rate in severe cases are also discussed.

Efficacies of first and second tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in refractory ulcerative colitis patients in real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Switching tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors is an important treatment option for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who fail the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, although many questions about this option remain unanswered.

METHODS

The efficacy of the second anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in refractory UC patients who failed the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy was examined using the Mayo score as a measure of disease activity at week 8. The efficacy of the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy before treatment and at weeks 8 and 52 was also evaluated in real-world practice.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in remission induction and maintenance between infliximab and adalimumab as the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in UC patients. Of 123 UC patients, 21 (17.1%) switched tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Eight (38.1%), 4 (19.0%), 7 (33.3%), and 2 (9.5%) patients switched from infliximab to adalimumab, infliximab to golimumab, adalimumab to infliximab, and adalimumab to golimumab, respectively. Three (100%) with intolerance to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, 5 (41.7%) with loss of response to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, and 1 (20.0%) with no improvement with the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy had clinical remission at week 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors is more effective for refractory UC patients who are intolerant and lose response to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy rather than for those showing no improvement with the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy. Patients with primary failure of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy should be switched to another class of drug.

The Treatment of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Biologic Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been transformative to the therapeutic goals in the pediatric population. We review the biologics used to treat IBD, highlighting the importance of patient selection, dosing considerations, and therapeutic drug monitoring in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Infliximab is well-established as a safe and efficacious therapy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Both dose escalation strategies and therapeutic drug monitoring increase the likelihood of response to anti-TNFα therapies. Early real-world experience of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in pediatric IBD shows promising results, including clinical response rates comparable to what is seen in adults, but there are limited data using them as first-line therapies. Biologic therapies have improved outcomes in pediatric IBD, including achieving mucosal healing as well as improved growth and pubertal development. Therapeutic drug monitoring improves likelihood of response to anti-TNFα therapies, but further studies for vedolizumab and ustekinumab are necessary.

Pretreatment Frailty Is Independently Associated With Increased Risk of Infections After Immunosuppression in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Infections are an important adverse effect of immunosuppression for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). However, risk of infection cannot be sufficiently determined based on patients' ages or comorbidities. Frailty has been associated with outcomes of patients with other inflammatory diseases. We aimed to determine the association between frailty and risk of infections after immunosuppression for IBD.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of 11,001 patients with IBD, using a validated frailty definition based on International Classification of Disease codes to identify patients who were frail vs fit in the 2 years before initiation of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or immunomodulator therapy, from 1996 through 2010. Our primary outcome was an infection in the first year after treatment. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for clinically pertinent confounders (age, comorbidities, steroid use, and combination therapy) to determine the association between frailty and posttreatment infections.

RESULTS

There were 1299 patients treated with an anti-TNF agent and 2676 patients treated with an immunomodulator. In this cohort, 5% of patients who received anti-TNF therapy and 7% of patients who received an immunomodulator were frail in the 2 years before immunosuppression. Frail patients were older and had more comorbidities. Higher proportions of frail patients developed infections after treatment (19% after TNF and 17% after immunomodulators) compared with fit patients (9% after TNF and 7% after immunomodulators; P < .01 for frail vs fit in both groups). Frail patients had an increased risk of infection after we adjusted for age, comorbidities, and concomitant medications (anti-TNF adjusted odds ratio, 2.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.93] and immunomodulator adjusted odds ratio, 1.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.70]).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was associated with infections after immunosuppression in patients with IBD after we adjust for age and comorbidities. Systematic assessment and strategies to improve frailty might reduce infection risk in patients with IBD.

Costunolide improved dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute ulcerative colitis in mice through NF-κB, STAT1/3, and Akt signaling pathways

Costunolide (CTL) is the major sesquiterpene lactone from Radix Aucklandiae, which is widely used on the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. However, the therapeutic effect of costunolide in ulcerative colitis (UC) is still unknown. Herein, we sought to evaluate the therapeutic effects and underlying mechanisms of costunolide on UC. ICR mice were intraperitoneally administered with costunolide (10 mg/kg) for 10 days. Beginning on the 4th day of drug administration, acute colitis was induced by feeding 4% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) for additional 7 days. Costunolide markedly attenuated DSS-induced body weight loss, colonic shortening, elevation in disease activity index, and pathological damage of colon, and decreased the number of CD4⁺ T cells in colon tissues. Furthermore, costunolide significantly inhibited myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and nitric oxide (NO) level in colon tissues in DSS-exposed mice. Meanwhile, costunolide also suppressed DSS-induced expression of induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in both mRNA and protein levels. Mechanistically, costunolide repressed the phosphorylation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) p65 and degradation of inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB), as well as the excessive activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 1/3 (STAT1/3) and serine/threonine protein kinase Akt (Akt) in colon tissues in DSS-challenged mice. These findings successfully demonstrated that costunolide ameliorated DSS-induced murine acute colitis by suppressing inflammation through inactivation of NF-κB, STAT1/3, and Akt pathways. These results also suggested that costunolide may be a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of acute UC.

Associations Between Obesity and the Effectiveness of Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Agents in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Background: A total of 15% to 40% of adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are obese. The influence of obesity on anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) treatment in IBD patients is not consistent. Objective: To determine the association between obesity and the efficacy of anti-TNF treatment in IBD patients. Methods: We performed a systematic search from January 1990 through November 2019 on MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane library. We included randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies that investigated the outcome of anti-TNF treatment in IBD patients with stratification according to body mass index or body weight. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% CI were calculated. Results: In this pooled meta-analysis, we observed that obesity increased the odds of failure of anti-TNF therapy (OR = 1.195; 95% CI = 1.034-1.380; P = 0.015; I2 = 47.8%). After performing subgroup analyses, obesity was associated with higher odds of anti-TNF treatment failure in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (OR = 1.413; 95% CI = 1.008-1.980; P = 0.045; I2 = 20.0%) but not in Crohn’s disease patients (OR = 1.099; 95% CI = 0.928-1.300). Obesity significantly increased the odds of treatment failure of both dose-fixed and weight-based anti-TNF agents (OR = 1.121, 95% CI = 1.027-1.224, P = 0.011, and OR = 1.449, 95% CI = 1.006-2.087, P = 0.046, respectively). Conclusion and Relevance: In our meta-analysis, obesity was associated with the inferior response of anti-TNF treatments in UC patients. Clinicians should be aware that obese UC patients may require higher doses in anti-TNF treatment.

Comparison of Real-World Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in Biologic-Naïve Korean Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Population-Based Study

PURPOSE

Data on the comparative effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are extremely limited, especially in the Asian population. We compared clinically important outcomes [colectomy, UC-related emergency room (ER) visits, UC-related hospitalizations, and need for corticosteroids] for these two biologics in biologic-naïve Korean patients with UC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using National Health Insurance claims, we collected data on patients who were diagnosed with UC and exposed to IFX or ADA between 2010 and 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 862 new users of biologics were included, of whom 630 were treated with IFX and 232 were treated with ADA. Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years after starting biologic therapy, there were no significant differences in the risk of colectomy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-11.63], ER visits (aHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79-3.16), hospitalizations (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.17), and corticosteroid use (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76-1.78) between IFX and ADA users. These results were stable even when only patients who used biologics for ≥6 months were analyzed. Additionally, these results were unchanged in patients treated with biologic monotherapy or combination therapy with immunomodulators.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide population-based study, there was no significant difference in the risk of colectomy, ER visits, hospitalizations, and corticosteroid use between IFX and ADA users. Our findings indicate that IFX and ADA have comparable effectiveness in biologic-naïve Korean patients with UC.

Earlier discontinuation of TNF-α inhibitor therapy in female patients with inflammatory bowel disease is related to a greater risk of side effects

BACKGROUND

In rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis female sex has been shown to be associated with discontinuation of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) therapy.

AIM

To retrospectively assess the association between sex and TNF-α drug persistence in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

All IBD patients on anti-TNF-α therapy with a minimum follow-up of 12 months in a single tertiary centre were identified. Patient and treatment characteristics and reasons for anti-TNF-α discontinuation were recorded. Overall and cause-specific drug persistence was analysed with Kaplan-Meier followed by Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

We included 529 patients (49.9% male) with 631 treatment episodes (2280 anti-TNF-α treatment years) and 289 discontinuations of therapy. Female sex (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.74), greater age at start of therapy per decade (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.27] and dose escalation (aHR 3.74, 95% CI 2.78-5.02) were associated with TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation. Total cohort cause-specific analysis identified female sex to be associated with side effects (aHR 4.05, 95% CI 2.36-6.98) but not to other discontinuation reasons. Adalimumab (aHR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.60) and golimumab (aHR 4.97, 95% CI 2.30-10.74) use and dose-escalation (aHR 7.71, 95% CI 5.28-11.26) were associated with secondary loss of response.

CONCLUSION

Drug persistence of anti-TNF-α therapy is lower in females as compared to males, mainly because of higher rates of side effects in females. Understanding the sex specific differences in effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF-α compounds can aid physicians in clinical decision-making.

Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) but the response is variable and there is little data on comparative effectiveness. Apart from previous exposure to anti-TNF agents, predictors of response have not been identified. We aimed to (i) compare the efficacy of anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab in UC and (ii) investigate the utility of clinical and biochemical parameters in predicting response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients commencing any biological therapy for ambulant UC were included. Disease activity was monitored serially with the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index for up to 12 months. We compared the efficacy of anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of response and remission on an intention-to-treat basis. We examined the utility of faecal calprotectin (FC) and early normalization of FC to predict response.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients commencing anti-TNF and 42 commencing vedolizumab therapy were included. Vedolizumab-treated patients had significantly greater previous anti-TNF therapy exposure and a lower baseline FC. Response, remission and steroid-free remission rates were comparable between both groups at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Clinical remission but not steroid-free remission at 12 months was higher in the vedolizumab group. There was a significant reduction in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and FC at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months compared with baseline in both groups. Baseline FC and early normalization did not predict response at 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of anti-TNF and vedolizumab in UC appear comparable. We could not identify any predictors of response and remission.

In the absence of head-to-head trials, what do real world studies tell us about the comparative effectiveness of biologics in Crohn's disease

Head-to-head clinical trials are the highest quality of evidence to support comparative effectiveness. However, there are currently no head-to-head phase 3 clinical trials of biologics in Crohn's Disease. With a need for direct comparisons but lagging RCTs, Real World Data (RWD) can provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of biologics for a diverse population that is more generalizable to routine practice. The majority of available real-world comparative analyses show no significant difference in effectiveness outcomes-primarily clinical remission and CD related complications. Real-world data is limited by its susceptibility to bias and clinicians must critically evaluate the methods and data sources utilized. Moving forward, it is important to note that comparisons including newer biologics may be limited by significant prior biologic exposure. Additionally, shared decision making incorporates efficacy, safety, and tolerability with patient preference and clinicians should use data from real-world comparative analyses as a part of this equation.

The Multifactorial Etiopathogeneses Interplay of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Overview

The gastrointestinal system where inflammatory bowel disease occurs is central to the immune system where the innate and the adaptive/acquired immune systems are balanced in interactions with gut microbes under homeostasis conditions. This article overviews the high-throughput research screening on multifactorial interplay between genetic risk factors, the intestinal microbiota, urbanization, modernization, Westernization, the environmental influences and immune responses in the etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease in humans. Inflammatory bowel disease is an expensive multifactorial debilitating disease that affects thousands new people annually worldwide with no known etiology or cure. The conservative therapeutics focus on the established pathology where the immune dysfunction and gut injury have already happened but do not preclude or delay the progression. Inflammatory bowel disease is evolving globally and has become a global emergence disease. It is largely known to be a disease in industrial-urbanized societies attributed to modernization and Westernized lifestyle associated with environmental factors to genetically susceptible individuals with determined failure to process certain commensal antigens. In the developing nations, increasing incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with rapid urbanization, modernization and Westernization of the population. In summary, there are identified multiple associations to host exposures potentiating the landscape risk hazards of inflammatory bowel disease trigger, that include: Western life-style and diet, host genetics, altered innate and/or acquired/adaptive host immune responses, early-life microbiota exposure, change in microbiome symbiotic relationship (dysbiosis/dysbacteriosis), pollution, changing hygiene status, socioeconomic status and several other environmental factors have long-standing effects/influence tolerance. The ongoing multipronged robotic studies on gut microbiota composition disparate patterns between the rural vs. urban locations may help elucidate and better understand the contribution of microbiome disciplines/ecology and evolutionary biology in potentially protecting against the development of inflammatory bowel disease.

Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 1: Ambulatory Care-An Evidence-based Guideline From European Crohn's and Colitis Organization and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

The contemporary management of ambulatory ulcerative colitis (UC) continues to be challenging with ∼20% of children needing a colectomy within childhood years. We thus aimed to standardize daily treatment of pediatric UC and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)-unclassified through detailed recommendations and practice points.

METHODS

These guidelines are a joint effort of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) and the Paediatric IBD Porto group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). An extensive literature search with subsequent evidence appraisal using robust methodology was performed before 2 face-to-face meetings. All 40 included recommendations and 86 practice points were endorsed by 43 experts in Paediatric IBD with at least an 88% consensus rate.

RESULTS

These guidelines discuss how to optimize the use of mesalamine (including topical), systemic and locally active steroids, thiopurines and, for more severe disease, biologics. The use of other emerging therapies and the role of surgery are also covered. Algorithms are provided to aid therapeutic decision-making based on clinical assessment and the Paediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI). Advice on contemporary therapeutic targets incorporating the use of calprotectin and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring are presented, as well as other management considerations around pouchitis, extraintestinal manifestations, nutrition, growth, psychology, and transition. A brief section on disease classification using the PIBD-classes criteria and IBD-unclassified is also part of these guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines provide a guide to clinicians managing children with UC and IBD-unclassified management to provide modern management strategies while maintaining vigilance around appropriate outcomes and safety issues.

Prospective Observational Evaluation of Time-Dependency of Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Drug Concentrations: The POETIC Study

OBJECTIVES

Adalimumab is usually self-injected at home, making prospective serial-sampling studies challenging and scarce. This has led to a gap in knowledge about evolution of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAAs) over time and its correlation with clinical and inflammatory outcomes.

METHODS

A program for home visits by physicians at induction, every 3 months and at event of relapse, was established prospectively for Crohn's disease (CD) patients. At each visit, patients' clinical scores were determined and sera were obtained for C-reactive protein, drug, and AAA levels. This cohort was compared to a parallel prospective cohort of infliximab-treated CD patients. In a subgroup of 29 patients, trough and in-between-trough levels were compared, to elucidate the importance of timing of sampling during the injection cycle.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight CD patients starting adalimumab were prospectively followed (median follow-up 44 weeks) and 621 serum samples were analyzed. Thirty-three patients (32%) developed AAA; 18/33 (55%) of them as early as week 2, and 26/33 (79%) by week 14. Induction period AAAs were strongly associated with primary non-response (odds ratio (OR) = 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-17.8, p = 0.005). As compared to antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), AAA formation rate over time was significantly lower (p = 0.01) and AAA were much more specific-85% of AAA events were associated with loss-of-response compared with 58% rate for ATI (p = 0.01). In 29 patients sampled serially during an injection cycle, levels of drug and AAA seemed comparable between four time-points during a single cycle both in patients with or without AAA (n = 8, n = 21, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

When followed prospectively and serially, AAAs are found to arise earlier than previously appreciated and their impact may be more pronounced for primary rather than secondary, non-response. Drug and AAA levels were similar both at trough and in-between injections, enabling to simplify therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab.

Population-based cohort study on comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease

Background

The comparison of effectiveness and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is relevant for clinical practice and stakeholders.

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the risk of abdominal surgery, steroid utilization, and hospitalization for infection in Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) patients newly treated with infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA).

Methods

A retrospective population-based cohort study was performed using health information systems data from Lazio region, Italy. Patients with CD or UC diagnosis were enrolled at first prescription of IFX or ADA during 2008–2014 (index date). Only new drug users were followed for 2 years from the index date. IFX versus ADA adjusted hazard ratios were calculated applying “intention-to-treat” approach, controlling for several characteristics and stratifying the analysis on steroid use according to previous drug utilization. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to “as-treated” approach, adjusting for propensity score, censoring at switching or discontinuation, and evaluating different lengths of follow-up periods.

Results

We enrolled 1,432 IBD patients (42% and 83% exposed to IFX for CD and UC, respectively). In both diseases, treatment effects did not differ in any outcome considered, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the results from the main analysis.

Conclusion

In our population-based cohort study, effectiveness and safety data in new users of ADA or IFX with CD or UC were comparable for the outcomes we tested.

Update on Data Reuse in Health Care

Objective: Reuse of clinical data has broad use in clinical, research, governmental, and business settings. This summary provides an update on the benefits, barriers to use with large clinical databases, policy frameworks that have been formulated, and challenges. Methods: This report highlights some recent publications on the diverse uses of clinical data and some policy initiatives to promote reuse. It also contains the opinions of the author. Results: Although many examples of the benefits of data reuse have been documented, this summary also reviews why the quality of clinical data needs to be the focus of future informatics work. Conclusion: The promise of reusing data outweighs potential risks, but concerns about privacy and the need to modernize our legal framework will be necessary to realize the full benefits of real-world evidence.

Prospective comparison of preference and efficacy of adalimumab and infliximab for treating ulcerative colitis naive to antitumor necrosis factor therapy

There have been few reports on 2 tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, infliximab and adalimumab, with respect to patient preference and efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC).We used questionnaires to evaluate the preference and reasons for drug choice between infliximab and adalimumab in UC patients naive to antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. We also analyzed the efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab prospectively and endoscopically before treatment and at 14 and 54 weeks.Of the 25 UC patients, infliximab and adalimumab were chosen by 10 (40%) and 15 (60%), respectively. Patients who favored infliximab considered "fear of syringes" (7/10, 70%) as the most important influencing factor, whereas patients who favored adalimumab considered "ease of administration" (10/15, 66.7%) and "time required for therapy" (10/15, 66.7%) as the most important factors. There were no statistical differences in remission induction and maintenance between the infliximab and adalimumab groups with regard to response, remission, mucosal healing, steroid-free, and steroid-free remission rates at weeks 14 and 54.The efficacy of adalimumab in remission induction and maintenance was equivalent to that of infliximab in UC patients naive to antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy in this prospective study, but more patients preferred adalimumab.

The Impact of Therapeutic Antibodies on the Management of Digestive Diseases: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions

The development of therapeutic antibodies represents a revolutionary change in medical therapy for digestive diseases. Beginning with the initial studies that confirmed the pathogenicity of cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease, the development and application of therapeutic antibodies brought challenges and insights into their potential and optimal use. Infliximab was the first biological drug approved for use in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The lessons learned from infliximab include the importance of immunogenicity and the influence of pharmacokinetics on disease response and outcomes. Building on this foundation, other therapeutic antibodies achieved approval for inflammatory bowel disease and many more are in development for several digestive diseases. In this review, we reflect on the history of therapeutic antibodies and discuss current practice and future directions for the field.

Adalimumab in ulcerative colitis - efficacy, safety and optimization in the era of treat-to target

INTRODUCTION

Active ulcerative colitis is associated with significant morbidity and impairment to quality of life. Adalimumab is a welcome addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for clinicians treating patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapies, an indication with few prior treatment options. It offers the convenience of self-injection and is most appropriate for outpatients with moderate disease activity. Areas covered: This review briefly summarizes data from well-designed clinical trials and observational real-life studies that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in UC. Particular attention is paid to newer studies, including those with objective treatment endpoints and pharmacokinetic outcomes that incorporate a treat to target approach in inflammatory bowel disease. Expert opinion: Adalimumab is effective for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapies. At currently approved doses, it is most suitable for use in outpatients with moderate disease activity; higher doses may be required for patients with more severe disease. The convenience of self-injection will make it popular for remote patients and it may be an appropriate option in patients in whom monotherapy, rather than combination therapy with an immunomodulator, is preferred.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of immunosuppressants and biologics for reducing hospitalisation and surgery in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have a progressive course leading to hospitalisation and surgery. The ability of existing therapies to alter disease course is not clearly defined.

AIM

To investigate the comparative efficacy of currently available inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies to reduce hospitalisation and surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in MEDLINE/PubMed for randomised controlled trials (RCT) published between January 1980 and May 2016 examining efficacy of biological or immunomodulator therapy in IBD. We performed direct comparisons of pooled proportions of hospitalisation and surgery. Pair-wise comparisons using a random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to assess comparative efficacy of different treatments.

RESULTS

We identified seven randomised controlled trials (5 CD; 2 UC) comparing three biologics and one immunomodulator with placebo. In CD, anti-TNF biologics significantly reduced hospitalisation [Odds ratio (OR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.60] and surgery (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.42) compared to placebo. No statistically significant reduction was noted with azathioprine or vedolizumab. Azathioprine was inferior to both infliximab and adalimumab in preventing CD-related hospitalisation (>97.5% probability). Anti-TNF biologics significantly reduced hospitalisation (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.80) and surgery (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.97) in UC. There were no statistically significant differences in the pair-wise comparisons between active treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In CD and UC, anti-TNF biologics are efficacious in reducing the odds of hospitalisation by half and surgery by 33-77%. Azathioprine and vedolizumab were not associated with a similar improvement, but robust conclusions may be limited due to paucity of RCTs.

Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, infliximab or vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

Background

There are no head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of biologics in ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of adalimumab, infliximab and vedolizumab as first-line agents to induce clinical remission and mucosal healing (MH) in UC.

Methods

We constructed a decision tree based on a payer's perspective in the USA to estimate the first year costs of adalimumab, infliximab or vedolizumab to achieve clinical remission and MH in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Transition probabilities were derived from ACT, ULTRA and GEMINI RCT data. Costs were derived from Medicare reimbursement rates and wholesale drug prices.

Results

Assuming a biological-naïve cohort, infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks was more cost-effective ($99 171 per MH achieved) than adalimumab 40 mg every other week ($316 378 per MH achieved) and vedolizumab every 8 weeks ($301 969 per MH achieved) at 1 year. Non-drug administration cost of infliximab exceeding $1974 per infusion would make adalimumab more cost-effective. First-line UC therapy with vedolizumab would be cost-effective if the drug acquisition price was <$2537 for each 300 mg administration during the 1-year time horizon.

Conclusions

If non-drug costs of infliximab administration are not excessive (<$2000), infliximab is the most cost-effective first-line biologic for moderate-to-severe UC. Exceeding this threshold infusion-related cost would make adalimumab the more cost-effective therapy. Considering its drug costs in the USA, vedolizumab appears to be appropriately used as a second-line biologic after antitumour necrosis factor failure.