Advances in treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Oligorecurrent/Oligoprogressive Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

This paper is a review of the literature on oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastasis treated with SBRT. The use of mediastinal SBRT had historically been not feasible in view of the expected toxicity due to the proximity of critical structures such as the airways and esophagus. Despite the heterogeneity and lack of some data in the studies analyzed, this literature review is the first published and can be a valid guide for the radiotherapist in the management of oligometastatic/oligoprogressive patients, with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Introduction: Mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastases are a challenging condition in patients affected by solid tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could play a crucial role in the therapeutic management and in the so-called “no-fly zone”, delivering high doses of radiation in relatively few treatment fractions with excellent sparing of healthy surrounding tissues and low toxicity. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SBRT in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lesions with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: Two blinded investigators performed a critical review of the Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA), starting from a specific question: What is the clinical impact of SBRT for the treatment of oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar metastasis? All retrospective and prospective clinical trials published in English up to February 2022 were analyzed. Results: A total of 552 articles were identified and 12 of them were selected with a total number of 478 patients treated with SBRT for mediastinal or hilar node recurrence. All the studies are retrospective, published between 2015 and 2021 with a median follow-up ranging from 12 to 42.2 months. Studies following SBRT for lung lesions or retreatments after thorax radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer were also included. The studies showed extensive heterogeneity in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequently reported histology. Different dose schemes were used, with a higher prevalence of 4–8 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions, but dose escalation was also used up to 52 Gy in 4 fractions with dose constraints mainly derived from RTOG 0813 trial. The radiotherapy technique most frequently used was volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a median PTV volume ranging from 7 to 25.7 cc. The clinical outcome seems to be very encouraging with 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 84 to 94%, 53 to 88% and 23 to 53.9%, respectively. Half of the studies did not report toxicity greater than G3 and only five cases of fatal toxicity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: From the present review, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions because of the heterogeneity of the studies analyzed. However, SBRT appears to be a safe and effective option in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lymph node recurrence, with a good toxicity profile. Its use in clinical practice is still limited, and there is extensive heterogeneity in patient selection and fractionation schedules. Good performance status, small PTV volume, absence of previous thoracic irradiation, and administration of a high biologically effective dose (BED) seem to be factors that correlate with greater local control and better survival rates. In the presence of symptoms related to the thoracic lymph nodes, SBRT determines a rapid control that lasts over time. We look forward to the prospective studies that are underway for definitive conclusions.

Biological Bases of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Potential Crosslinks With Immunogenic Effects of Radiation

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have gained an established role in the treatment of different tumors. Indeed, their use has dramatically changed the landscape of cancer care, especially for tumor types traditionally known to have poor outcomes. However, stimulating anticancer immune responses may also elicit an unusual pattern of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), different from those of conventional chemotherapy, likely due to a self-tolerance impairment featuring the production of autoreactive lymphocytes and autoantibodies, or a non-specific autoinflammatory reaction. Ionizing radiation has proven to promote both positive pro-inflammatory and immunostimolatory activities, and negative anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive mechanisms, as a result of cross-linked interactions among radiation dose, the tumor microenvironment and the host genetic predisposition. Several publications argue in favor of combining immunotherapy and a broad range of radiation schedules, based on the recent evidence of superior treatment responses and patient survival. The synergistic modulation of the immune response by radiation therapy and immunotherapeutics, particularly those manipulating T-cell activation, may also affect the type and severity of irAEs, suggesting a relationship between the positive antitumor and adverse autoimmune effects of these agents. As yet, information on factors that may help to predict immune toxicity is still lacking. The aim of our work is to provide an overview of the biological mechanisms underlying irAEs and possible crosslinks with radiation-induced anticancer immune responses. We believe such an overview may support the optimization of immunotherapy and radiotherapy as essential components of multimodal anticancer therapeutic approaches. Challenges in translating these to clinical practice are discussed.

Magnusson N. Drug-Induced Hypertension Caused by Multikinase Inhibitors (Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib and Axitinib) in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment

This paper reviews current treatments for renal cell carcinoma/cancer (RCC) with the multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) sorafenib, sunitinib, lenvatinib and axitinib. Furthermore, it compares these drugs regarding progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse effects (AE), with a focus on hypertension. Sorafenib and sunitinib, which are included in international clinical guidelines as first- and second-line therapy in metastatic RCC, are now being challenged by new-generation drugs like lenvatinib and axitinib. These drugs have shown significant clinical benefits for patients with RCC, but all four induce a variety of AEs. Hypertension is one of the most common AEs related to MKI treatment. Comparing sorafenib, sunitinib and lenvatinib revealed that sorafenib and sunitinib had the same efficacy, but sorafenib was safer to use. Lenvatinib showed better efficacy than sorafenib but worse safety. No trials have yet been completed that compare lenvatinib with sunitinib. Although axitinib promotes slightly higher hypertension rates compared to sunitinib, the overall discontinuation rate and cardiovascular complications are favourable. Although the mean rate of patients who develop hypertension is similar for each drug, some trials have shown large differences, which could indicate that lifestyle and/or genetic factors play an additional role.

Molecular Characterization and Putative Pathogenic Pathways of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma

Tuberous sclerosis complex–associated renal cell carcinoma (TSC-RCC) has distinct clinical and histopathologic features and is considered a specific subtype of RCC. The genetic alterations of TSC1 or TSC2 are responsible for the development of TSC. In this study, we assessed the mTOR pathway activation and aimed to evaluate molecular characteristics and pathogenic pathways of TSC-RCC. Two cases of TSC-RCC, one from a 31-year-old female and the other from an 8-year-old male, were assessed. The mTOR pathway activation was determined by immunohistochemistry. The mutational spectrum of both TSC-RCCs was evaluated by whole exome sequencing (WES), and pathogenic pathways were analyzed. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed by NanoString Technologies nCounter platform. The mTOR pathway activation and the germline mutations of TSC2 were identified in both TSC-RCC cases. The WES revealed several cancer gene alterations. In Case 1, genetic alterations of CHD8, CRISPLD1, EPB41L4A, GNA11, NOTCH3, PBRM1, PTPRU, RGS12, SETBP1, SMARCA4, STMN1, and ZNRF3 were identified. In Case 2, genetic alterations of IWS1 and TSC2 were identified. Further, putative pathogenic pathways included chromatin remodeling, G protein–coupled receptor, Notch signaling, Wnt/β-catenin, PP2A and the microtubule dynamics pathway in Case 1, and mRNA processing and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in Case 2. Additionally, the ALK and CRLF2 mRNA expression was upregulated and CDH1, MAP3K1, RUNX1, SETBP1, and TSC1 mRNA expression was downregulated in both TSC-RCCs. We present mTOR pathway activation and molecular characteristics with pathogenic pathways in TSC-RCCs, which will advance our understanding of the pathogenesis of TSC-RCC.

Therapeutic Sequencing in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The influx of multiple novel therapeutic options in the mRCC field has brought a challenge for treatment sequencing in this disease. In the past few years, cabozantinib, nivolumab and the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus have been approved in the second-line setting. As there is no direct comparison between these agents and the studies have failed to show improved benefit among a biomarker-selected patient population, appropriate patient selection based on clinical factors for individualized therapy is critical. Herein we provide a comprehensive overview of current data from each agent through the discussion of disease biology, clinical trials, potential biomarkers and distilling future perspectives in the field.

Everolimus suppresses invasion and migration of renal cell carcinoma by inhibiting FAK activity and reversing epithelial to mesenchymal transition in vitro and in vivo

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults and the major cause of mortality in urological cancer. Most patients with RCC are asymptomatic until the disease is advanced and unresectable. In this situation, systemic therapy with immunotherapy or molecularly targeted therapy agents play an important role in therapeutic strategy. Everolimus (EVE), an m-TOR inhibitor, has the potential to inhibit tumor progression at multiple levels and is indicated for the treatment of advanced RCC in patients whose disease has metastasis. In this study, we provide molecular evidence associated with the antimetastatic effect of everolimus by demonstrating the suppression of lung metastasis of 786-O cells in mouse model. This effect was associated with reduced protein expressions of p-FAK (Tyr 925), p-Src (Tyr416), Vimentin, and RhoA and also with increased the E-cadherin protein expression. In summary, these findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in the antimetastatic effect of everolimus and are thus valuable in the treatment of metastatic RCC.

Beyond checkpoint inhibition - Immunotherapeutical strategies in combination with radiation

The revival of cancer immunotherapy has taken place with the clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibition. However, the spectrum of immunotherapeutic approaches is much broader encompassing T cell engaging strategies, tumour-specific vaccination, antibodies or immunocytokines. This review focuses on the immunological effects of irradiation and the evidence available on combination strategies with immunotherapy. The available data suggest great potential of combined treatments, yet also poses questions about dose, fractionation, timing and most promising multimodal strategies.