Development of a highly sensitive and specific carboxy-terminal human pancreastatin assay to monitor neuroendocrine tumor behavior

The University of Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinic

The Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Clinic was founded and developed by two remarkable physicians, Thomas and Sue O'Dorisio. Tom was an Endocrinologist and close friend and colleague of Aaron Vinik. Both men were pioneers in studies of gastrointestinal hormones and the management of patients with NETs. Sue was a Pediatric Oncologist and research scientist with great expertise in new drug development and clinical trials. She and Tom were leaders in bringing somatostatin analogs and somatostatin-conjugated radioligands to the clinic for the therapy and diagnosis of NETs. All three physicians received lifetime achievement awards for their contributions to the field of NETs. This is the story of how the Iowa NET Clinic developed over the years to become a model for the multidisciplinary management of patients with NETs, culminating in its designation as a European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society NET Center of Excellence, and the receipt of a Specialized Project of Research Excellence (SPORE) grant for the study of NETs from the National Institutes of Health.

A Comparison of the Outcomes of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Transarterial Radioembolization in the Management of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases in Adults: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this article is to review the existing English scientific literature and determine the superior modality between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs). To that end, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. We identified 14 observational studies and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of TACE or TARE to treat NELM. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias in these studies. We concluded that TACE and TARE appeared to have similar outcomes when comparing overall survival, progression-free survival, radiological response, symptomatic response, and the incidence of severe adverse events. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to identify the superior modality conclusively. We also identified several unique prognostic factors for overall survival, such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, volumetric multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and pancreastatin.

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETS) is steadily evolving and is influenced by multiple factors. Sporadic PNETs are generally managed more aggressively than those occurring in the background of hereditary syndromes, and functioning PNETs are almost always resected if they are not metastatic. Localized nonfunctioning PNETs less than 2 cm can often be observed. Surgical resection for localized PNET greater than 2 cm comprises parenchymal sparing pancreas resections, such as enucleations, or formal anatomic resection, such as distal pancreatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy. PNETs commonly metastasize to the liver, and several systemic and liver-directed options to treat hepatic metastases are available.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

It Is Time to Rethink Biomarkers for Surveillance of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Tumor biomarkers (TBMs) reflect disease burden and correlate with survival for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). This study sought to determine the performance of chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST), neurokinin A (NKA), and serotonin (5HT) during follow-up assessment of resected SBNETs.

METHODS

An institutional database identified patients undergoing surgery for SBNETs. Tumor biomarker levels were assessed as categorical (normal vs elevated) and continuous variables for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) via the Kaplan-Meier method with Cox multivariable models adjusted for confounders. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of TBM levels in identifying imaging-confirmed progression were calculated.

RESULTS

In 218 patients (44% female, 92% node + , 73% metastatic, 97% G1 or G2), higher levels of CgA, PST, NKA, and 5HT correlated with higher-grade and metastatic disease at presentation (p < 0.05). Elevated pre- and postoperative CgA, PST, and NKA correlated with lower PFS and OS (p < 0.05; median follow-up period, 49.6 months). Normal CgA, PST, and NKA were present in respectively 20.3%, 16.9%, and 72.6% of the patients with progression, whereas elevated levels were present in respectively 69.5%, 24.8%, and 1.3% of the patients without progression. Using TBMs to determine progression showed superiority of PST (78.9% accuracy) over CgA (63.3% accuracy) or CgA and PST together (60.3% accuracy).

CONCLUSION

Although specific for progression, NKA was rarely elevated, limiting its usefulness. Pre- and postoperative PST and CgA correlated with disease burden and survival, with PST providing better discrimination of outcomes. During the follow-up period, use of PST most accurately detected progression. These results suggest that PST should replace CgA for SBNET surveillance.

Plasma Pancreastatin Predicts the Outcome of Surgical Cytoreduction in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Small Bowel

OBJECTIVES

Elevated pancreastatin (PST) levels have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We hypothesized that plasma PST levels that remain elevated following surgical cytoreduction portend a poor prognosis in well-differentiated small bowel NETs.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with small bowel NETs who underwent surgical cytoreduction at our institution were identified. Demographics, histopathologic characteristics, and biochemical data were collected. Only patients who had serial preoperative PST (PreopPST) and postoperative PST (PostopPST) levels were included in this study. Patients were sorted into groups by PST level to assess their response to surgical cytoreduction (group 1, PreopPST/PostopPST normal; group 2, PreopPST elevated/PostopPST normal; group 3, PreopPST/PostopPST elevated). Survival rates were calculated from the date of surgery.

RESULTS

PreopPST and PostopPST levels were collected from 300 patients. Patients in groups 1 (n = 74) and 2 (n = 81) had a significant survival advantage compared with patients in group 3 (n = 145) (P < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier 5- and 10-year survival rates were as follows: group 1: 93% and 82%; group 2: 91% and 65%; and group 3: 58% and 34%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial monitoring of plasma PST is useful in predicting long-term survival following surgical cytoreduction and can be helpful to identify patients who have a poor prognosis.

Prognostic Impact of Serum Pancreastatin Following Chemoembolization for Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the biomarker serum pancreastatin in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Patients with metastatic NET treated with TACE at a single institution from 2000 to 2013 were analyzed. Patient demographics, response to therapy, and long-term survival were compared with baseline pancreastatin level and changes in pancreastatin levels after TACE.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients underwent TACE during the study period. An initial pancreastatin level greater than 5000 pg/mL correlated with worse overall survival (OS) from time of first TACE (median OS, 58.5 vs. 22.1 months, p < 0.001). A decrease in pancreastatin level by 50% or more after TACE treatment correlated with improved OS (median OS 53.8 vs. 29.9 months, p = 0.032). Patients with carcinoid syndrome were more likely to have a subsequent increase in pancreastatin after initial drop post-TACE (78.1 vs. 55.2%, p = 0.002). Patients with an increase in pancreastatin levels after initial drop post-TACE were more likely to have liver progression on imaging (70.7 vs. 40.7%, p = 0.005) and more likely to need repeat TACE (21.1 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with liver metastases from NET treated with TACE, pancreastatin measurement may be a useful prognostic indicator. Extreme high levels before TACE can predict poor outcomes, whereas significant drops in pancreastatin after TACE correlate with improved survival. An increase in levels after initial decrease may predict progressive liver disease requiring repeat TACE. As such, pancreastatin levels should be measured throughout the TACE treatment period.

AACE/ACE disease state clinical review: diagnosis and management of midgut carcinoids

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a collection of complex tumors that arise from the diffuse endocrine system, primarily from the digestive tract. Carcinoid tumors most commonly originate from the small intestine. These tumors are either referred to as small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors or midgut carcinoids (MGCs). The purpose of this review article is to survey the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for patients with MGC and provide an overview of the complex multidisciplinary care involved in improving their quality of life, treatment outcomes, and survival.

METHODS

The current literature regarding the diagnosis and management of MGCs was reviewed.

RESULTS

Dry flushing and secretory diarrhea are the hallmarks of the clinical syndrome of MGC. Managing MGC requires attention to the overall symptom complex, including the physical effects of the tumor and biomarker levels. The somatostatin analogs (SAs) octreotide and lanreotide are highly efficacious for symptomatic improvement. MGCs require resection to encompass the primary tumor and mesenteric lymph node metastases and should include cholecystectomy if the patient is likely to receive SA therapy. Debulking of liver metastasis by resection in combination with ablative therapies and other liver-directed modalities may help palliate symptoms and hormonal overproduction in carefully selected patients. Quality of life is an important measure of patients' perception of the burden of their disease and impact of treatment modalities and may be a useful guide in deciding changes in therapy to alter apparent health status.

CONCLUSION

MGC is a challenging malignancy that requires the input of a multidisciplinary team to develop the best treatment plan. Consultation with expert centers that specialize in NETs may also be indicated for complex cases. With expert care, patients can be cured or live with the disease and enjoy good quality of life.

Neuroendocrine tumor biomarkers: From monoanalytes to transcripts and algorithms

The management of neuroendocrine neoplasia remains a perplexing problem because of the lack of knowledge of the biology of the disease, its late presentation, the relative insensitivity of imaging modalities and a paucity of predictably effective treatment options. A critical limitation is posed by the lack of accurate biomarkers to guide management, monitor the efficacy of therapy and provide a prognostic assessment of disease progress. Currently utilized monoanalyte biomarkers (e.g. chromogranin, serotonin, pancreastatin etc.) exhibit variable metrics, poor sensitivity, specificity, and predictive ability and are rarely used to guide clinical decision making. A National Cancer Institute Neuroendocrine Tumor summit conference held in 2007 noted biomarker limitations to be a crucial unmet need in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. Nevertheless little progress has been made in this field until recently with the consideration of blood transcript analysis, circulating tumor cells and miRNA measurement. Given the complexity and multidimensionality of the neoplastic process itself, the heterogeneity of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) as well as the interaction of the tumor microenvironment, it is not unexpected that no single (monoanalyte) biomarker has proven to be effective. This deduction reflects the growing recognition that use of a monoanalyte to define a multidimensional disease process has inherent flaws. Logic dictates that no single measured parameter can capture the pathobiological diversity of neoplasia and monoanalytes cannot define the multiple variables (proliferation, metabolic activity, invasive potential and metastatic propensity) that constitute tumor growth. Thus far, most biomarkers whether in tissue or blood/urine have been single analytes with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity and in general have failed to exhibit robust metrics or lacked methodological rigor. Neuroendocrine (NE) disease represents an area of biomarker paucity since the individual biomarkers (gastrin, insulin etc) are not widely applicable to the diverse types of NE neoplasia (NEN). Broad spectrum markers such as CgA have limitations in sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility. This review serves to provide a general background of the evolution of NET biomarkers. It provides an assessment of their current and past usage and limitations in assessing their diagnostic, pathologic and prognostic aspects in respect of NET. It provides a view of the changing methodology of biomarker development and the application of biomathematical analyses to redefining detection and treatment. Finally, it presents a description and consensus on current advances in transcript analysis, miRNA measurement and circulating tumor cell identification.

Biochemical Diagnosis and Preoperative Imaging of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors are a group of neoplasms that can arise in a variety of locations throughout the body and often metastasize early. A patient's only chance for cure is surgical removal of the primary tumor and all associated metastases, although even when surgical cure is unlikely, patients can benefit from surgical debulking. A thorough preoperative workup will often require multiple clinical tests and imaging studies to locate the primary tumor, delineate the extent of the disease, and assess tumor functionality. This review discusses the biomarkers important for the diagnosis of these tumors and the imaging modalities needed.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are slow-growing neoplasms capable of storing and secreting different peptides and neuroamines. Some of these substances cause specific symptom complexes, whereas others are silent. They usually have episodic expression, and the diagnosis is often made at a late stage. Although considered rare, the incidence of NETs is increasing. For these reasons, a high index of suspicion is needed. In this article, the different clinical syndromes and the pathophysiology of each tumor as well as the new and emerging biochemical markers and imaging techniques that should be used to facilitate an early diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis are reviewed.

Circulating tumor markers in patients with neuroendocrine tumors – a clinical perspective

Abstract: 

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon malignancies with a very diverse presentation and prognosis. Patients with NETs frequently have circulating tumor biomarkers that may aid in the diagnosis and help with prognostication. The most commonly used and best studied marker is chromogranin A, which appears to reflect the tumor burden and is useful at the time of diagnosis, and to monitor for recurrence after resection as well as to assess response to systemic therapy. Despite being the best studied marker, chromogranin A has significant limitations. Multiple other biomarkers are in use, but most have not been studied well and need further validation before being recommended for clinical practice. We review both established and novel circulating biomarkers, and highlight some of the limitations of tumor marker use in patients with NETs.

Biochemical prognostic indicators for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) are rare tumors that are frequently diagnosed late in the course of the disease. Several biomarkers have been proposed in the literature as prognostic factors for patients with these tumors. This article discusses a recent publication in Annals of Surgical Oncology from the University of Iowa analyzing the effect of different biomarkers on survival in patients with PNETs and SBNETs.

Chromogranin A is a reliable serum diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors but not for insulinomas

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a group of rare tumors. Chromogranin A (CgA) was considered as the most practical and useful serum tumor marker in PNET patients. But peripheral blood levels of CgA are not routinely tested in Chinese patients with PNETs. This study was to assess the diagnostic value of CgA in Chinese patients with PNETs especially in patients with insulinomas.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with PNETs including 57 insulinomas and 32 non-insulinoma PNETs as well as 86 healthy participants were enrolled in this study between September 2003 and June 2013. Serum levels of CgA were measured by ELISA method. Expression of CgA protein was detected in 26 PNET tissues including 14 insulinomas by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

Serum levels of CgA in 89 PNET patients were significantly higher than that in healthy controls (P = 7.2 × 10-9). Serum levels of CgA in 57 patients with insulinomas (median 64.8 ng/ml, range 25-164) were slightly higher than the levels in healthy controls (median 53.4 ng/ml, range 39-94) but much lower than the levels in 32 patients with non-insulinoma PNETs (median 193 ng/ml, range 27-9021), P = 0.001. The serum CgA levels were reduced in 16 of 17 patients with insulinomas after tumor resection. ROC curve showed that CgA values at 60 ng/ml distinguished patients with insulinomas from healthy controls but its sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% and 73.3%, respectively. In contrast, CgA values at 74 ng/ml distinguished patients with non-insulinoma PNETs from healthy controls, and the sensitivity and specificity were 65.6% and 91.9%, respectively. Except for two insulinomas with negative staining of CgA, 12 insulinoma tissues showed positive staining of CgA.

CONCLUSION

CgA is a reliable serum diagnostic biomarker for PNETs but not for insulinomas.

A multianalyte PCR blood test outperforms single analyte ELISAs (chromogranin A, pancreastatin, neurokinin A) for neuroendocrine tumor detection

A critical requirement in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management is a sensitive, specific and reproducible blood biomarker test. We evaluated a PCR-based 51 transcript signature (NETest) and compared it to chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST) and neurokinin A (NKA). The multigene signature was evaluated in two groups: i) a validation set of 40 NETs and controls and ii) a prospectively collected group of NETs (n=41, 61% small intestinal, 50% metastatic, 44% currently treated and 41 age-sex matched controls). Samples were analyzed by a two-step PCR (51 marker genes) protocol and ELISAs for CgA, PST and NKA. Sensitivity comparisons included χ(2), non-parametric measurements, ROC curves and predictive feature importance (PFAI) analyses. NETest identified 38 of 41 NETs. Performance metrics were: sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 92.8%, positive predictive value 92.8% and negative predictive value 92.8%. Single analyte ELISA metrics were: CgA 76, 59, 65, and 71%; PST 63, 56, 59, and 61% and NKA 39, 93, 84, and 60%. The AUCs (ROC analysis) were: NETest: 0.96±0.025, CgA: 0.67±0.06, PST 0.56±0.06, NKA: 0.66±0.06. NETest significantly outperformed single analyte tests (area differences: 0.284-0.403, Z-statistic 4.85-5.9, P<0.0001). PFAI analysis determined NETest had most value (69%) in diagnosis (CgA (13%), PST (9%), and NKA (9%)). Test data were consistent with the validation set (NETest >95% sensitivity and specificity, AUC =0.98 vs single analytes: 59-67% sensitivity, AUCs: 0.58-0.63). The NETest is significantly more sensitive and efficient (>93%) than single analyte assays (CgA, PST or NKA) in NET diagnosis. Blood-based multigene analytic measurement will facilitate early detection of disease recurrence and can predict therapeutic efficacy.

Pancreastatin predicts survival in neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Serum neurokinin A, chromogranin A, serotonin, and pancreastatin reflect tumor burden in neuroendocrine tumors. We sought to determine whether their levels correlate with survival in surgically managed small bowel (SBNETs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

METHODS

Clinical data were collected with Institutional Review Board approval for patients undergoing surgery at one center. Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were from the time of surgery. Event times were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Preoperative and postoperative laboratory values were tested for correlation with outcomes. A multivariate Cox model adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

Included were 98 SBNETs and 78 PNETs. Median follow-up was 3.8 years; 62 % had metastatic disease. SBNETs had lower median PFS than PNETs (2.0 vs. 5.6 years; p < 0.01). Median OS was 10.5 years for PNETs and was not reached for SBNETs. Preoperative neurokinin A did not correlate with PFS or OS. Preoperative serotonin correlated with PFS but not OS. Higher levels of preoperative chromogranin A and pancreastatin showed significant correlation with worse PFS and OS (p < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment for confounders, preoperative and postoperative pancreastatin remained independently predictive of worse PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Whether pancreastatin normalized postoperatively further discriminated outcomes. Median PFS was 1.7 years in patients with elevated preoperative pancreastatin versus 6.5 years in patients with normal levels (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher pancreastatin levels are significantly associated with worse PFS and OS in SBNETs and PNETs. This effect is independent of age, primary tumor site, and presence of nodal or metastatic disease. Pancreastatin provides valuable prognostic information and identifies surgical patients at high risk of recurrence who could benefit most from novel therapies.

New insights into the role of chronic inflammation and cytokines in the etiopathogenesis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Although previously considered rare, recent epidemiological studies have revealed that the incidence (3.6/100,000) and prevalence (35/100,000) of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the past few decades. Despite the progress in the understanding of GEP-NET molecular biology, there is still little advance in the early diagnosis due to lack of specific tumor markers. As the tumors are mostly detected in their late stage, they are not well controlled by either biotherapy or conventional chemotherapy, and thus represent a significant clinical issue. Chronic inflammation has been implicated in the development of GEP-NETs. This review presents recent findings that link pro-inflammatory cytokines to the molecular basis of GEP-NET tumorigenesis, leading to a more personalized approach to disease management and therapy.

Current Perspective on the Pathogenesis of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Progress in Biomarkers and Molecular Events

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract differ in their histopathologic and clinical presentation. Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs), representing only a small portion within gastrointestinal malignancies, are often associated with a delayed diagnosis due to their non-specific symptoms. The increased incidence of SI-NETs during the last decades demands earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment, which both rely on a better understanding on the underlying molecular mechanisms. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The purpose of this review is to discuss the biomolecular changes responsible for the pathogenesis of SI-NETs, and potential biomarkers in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. <b>Key Message</b> A greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underpin the pathogenesis of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) facilitates the classification, diagnosis and treatment of these relatively rare gastrointestinal malignancies. <b>Practical Implications</b> Currently, SI-NETs are diagnosed using histological examination and staining for various neuroendocrine markers. Genetically, SI-NETs are characterized by an absence of alterations to K-ras, p53 and DNA mismatch repair genes. Loss of chromosome 18, deletion of Smad2 and Smad4, and amplification of SRC, EGFR and PDGFR have been reported. Abnormal DNA methylation status, reflected by overexpression of DNA methyltransferase, higher methylation of the RASSF1A promoter and overexpression of histone H1x are also associated with SI-NETs. These tumors are also associated with fibrosis, possibly due to the high levels of serotonin and other fibrotic factors produced. Genetic studies have pinpointed genes that can differentiate SI-NETs from other neuroendocrine tumors (oxytocin receptor, G protein-coupled receptor 113, VMAT-1, CDX-2), enabling more accurate diagnosis. Paraneoplastic antigen Ma2, neurokinin A and the CART peptide are under investigation as prognostic biomarkers. There is, however, still an unmet need for more sensitive biomarkers for earlier diagnosis and for a more specific classification system that encompasses tumor histology and reliable predictors of clinical response.

Neuroendocrine tumor biomarkers: current status and perspectives

The identification of accurate harbingers of disease status and therapeutic efficacy are critical requirements in precise diagnosis and effective management. Initially, tissue analysis was regarded as ideal but invasive strategies represent risk compared with peripheral blood sampling. Thus far, most biomarkers, whether in tissue or blood/urine, have been single analytes with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity. Some analytes have not exhibited robust metrics or have lacked methodological rigor. Neuroendocrine disease represents an area of dire biomarker paucity since the individual biomarkers (gastrin, insulin, etc.) are not widely applicable to the diverse types of neuroendocrine neoplasia. Broad-spectrum markers such as chromogranin A have limitations in sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility. Monoanalytes cannot define the multiple variables (proliferation, metabolic activity, invasive potential, metastatic propensity) that constitute tumor growth. The restricted status of the neuroendocrine neoplasia field has resulted in a lack of comprehensive knowledge of the molecular and cellular biology of the disease, with tardy application of innovative technology. This overview examines limitations in current practice and describes contemporary viable strategies under evaluation, including the identification of novel analytes (gene transcripts, microRNA), circulating tumor cells and metabolic imaging agents that identify disease. Novel requirements are necessary to develop biomathematical algorithms for synchronous calibration of multiple molecular markers and predictive nomograms that interface biological variables to delineate disease progress or treatment efficacy. Optimally, the application of novel techniques and amalgamations of multianalyte assessment will provide a personalized molecular disease signature extrapolative of neuroendocrine neoplasia status and likelihood of progression and predictive of therapeutic opportunity.

Serum pancreastatin: the next predictive neuroendocrine tumor marker

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pancreastatin is a derived peptide of chromogranin A (CgA). Pancreastatin has the potential to be a diagnostic and predictive tumor marker in detecting NETs.

METHODS

Radioimmunoassay tests of pancreastatin and CgA were performed on 103 patient specimens collected at Mount Sinai Medical Center between 1/2010 and 7/2012. Patient demographics, diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, pathologic findings, adjuvant treatments, and survival were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis utilized SPSS v20 software.

RESULTS

Mean pancreastatin levels were significantly higher in the 92 NETs patients than in the 11 non-NETs patients (227.261 vs. 59.727, P < 0.05). Twenty-seven of the 92 patients with elevated pancreastatin levels (mean = 240.67), had normal CgA levels (mean = 4.65). Pancreastatin had sensitivity and specificity of 64% (59/92), and 100% (11/11). CgA had lower sensitivity and specificity of 43% (40/92), and 64% (7/11). In all 27 instances the pancreastatin concentration was found to be sole indicator of NET disease. When controlling for the level of CgA for the entire sample, a statistically significant difference was not found in the mean pancreastatin levels between both patient groups (P = 0.139, R = 0.484).

CONCLUSION

Pancreastatin has greater sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing NETs than CgA. Further investigation of pancreastatin's diagnostic and predictive value is warranted.

Neuroendocrine tumors arising in Meckel's diverticula: frequency of advanced disease warrants aggressive management

BACKGROUND

Meckel's diverticulum is a common anomaly of the GI tract, which occasionally gives rise to cancer. The most frequent tumors affecting these diverticula are neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and whether these should be treated in similar fashion as small bowel NETs or appendiceal NETs is unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single academic medical center between 1998 and 2012. Demographic, radiologic, biochemical, and clinicopathologic data were collected as well as status at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Seven patients were identified with NETs involving Meckel's diverticula, including one with limited information other than management of her late metastases. Of the six other patients, all had involvement of regional nodes, including three patients with tumors <2 cm in size, and four had liver metastases at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

NETs in Meckel's diverticula are rare tumors, but when they develop, are often associated with nodal metastases and liver metastases, even when the tumors are small. Therefore, optimal management of these NETs is small bowel resection with regional lymphadenectomy and debulking of liver metastases where feasible.

A single fasting plasma 5-HIAA value correlates with 24-hour urinary 5-HIAA values and other biomarkers in midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)

OBJECTIVES

5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) is used for the evaluation of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) but currently requires a 24-hour urine collection.

METHODS

We developed a gas chromatography mass spectroscopy-based plasma 5-HIAA assay. We compared 24-hour urine 5-HIAA values against plasma 5-HIAA values in 115 mixed-variety patients with NETs and in a subset of 72 patients with only small bowel NETs. We also compared the information gained from urinary and plasma 5-HIAA values with other biomarkers of midgut NET activity to determine the plasma assay's clinical implications.

RESULTS

In a group of 115 patients with all types of NETS, in a subset of patients with midgut NET and in a subgroup of midgut NETS with liver metastasis, the correlation between the urine and fasting plasma 5-HIAA values were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.0001). Comparison of the proportion of normal or abnormal urinary and plasma 5-HIAA values to the proportion of chromogranin, serotonin, neurokinin, or pancreastatin values that were in the normal or abnormal range yielded essentially identical information.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma fasting 5-HIAA values are proportional to urinary 5-HIAA values and yielded identical clinical correlation with other biomarkers.

Sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic paraganglioma and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-producing tumor (VIPoma)

OBJECTIVES

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors of the endocrine and nervous systems. Whereas early surgical resection can significantly reduce tumor mass, there are few data available concerning the control of hormonal secretion and associated symptoms. Studies have shown that the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in patients with pancreatic NETs. Here, we present 2 case reports of sunitinib in patients with different types of NETs.

METHODS

The patients were a 12-year-old boy with metastatic vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-producing tumor (VIPoma) and a 70-year-old woman with metastatic paraganglioma/NET. Both were treated in an outpatient clinical setting. Sunitinib was titrated to 37.5 mg on a continuous daily dosing schedule in the patient with VIPoma, and the dose was 50 mg/d (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) in the patient with the paraganglioma/NET.

RESULTS

The patient with the paraganglioma/NET had a confirmed complete radiographic response and the patient with VIPoma had a confirmed partial response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). In both patients, improvements were observed in biochemical tumor markers, clinical responses, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients, sunitinib reduced biochemical markers and stabilized or reduced tumor bulk and may therefore be a potential therapeutic option for these tumor types.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: biology, diagnosis,and treatment

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), a group of endocrine tumors arising in the pancreas, are among the most common neuroendocrine tumors. The genetic causes of familial and sporadic PNETs are somewhat understood, but their molecular pathogenesis remains unknown. Most PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential. The biological behavior of an individual PNET is unpredictable; higher tumor grade, lymph node and liver metastasis, and larger tumor size generally indicate a less favorable prognosis. Endocrine testing, imaging, and histological evidence are necessary to accurately diagnose PNETs. A 4-pronged aggressive treatment approach consisting of surgery, locoregional therapy, systemic therapy, and complication control has become popular in academic centers around the world. The optimal application of the multiple systemic therapeutic modalities is under development; efficacy, safety, availability, and cost should be considered when treating a specific patient. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of specific types of PNETs and familial PNET syndromes, including the novel Mahvash disease, are summarized.

Validation of neurokinin a assays in the United States and Europe

OBJECTIVES

International cooperative group trials require specific, sensitive biomarker assays that are validated between continents. Neurokinin A (NKA) has been shown to be a powerful independent predictor of a poor prognosis in well-differentiated midgut neuroendocrine tumors. We hypothesized that NKA concentrations of clinical specimens evaluated in NKA assays in the United States and the United Kingdom would be equivalent, even though assay techniques were significantly different.

METHODS

Frozen clinical specimen aliquots were shipped from the United States to the United Kingdom (n = 67), and from United Kingdom to the United States (n = 50). In addition, spiked plasma standards and medium-spiked standards were exchanged. Samples from the United States were directly assayed in a radioimmunoassay, whereas the UK specimens were extracted, and the reconstituted specimens assayed in the radioimmunoassay. Neurokinin A values from the 2 studies were analyzed by regression analysis.

RESULTS

The NKA values from the US and UK laboratories were essentially identical (United States to United Kingdom, r = 0.88, P < 0.0001; and United Kingdom to United States, r = 0.96, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Validation of biomarker assays across continents will ensure that laboratory observations made by researchers are equivalent and that prediction of clinical outcomes based on these assays is also reliable.

Comparison of clinicopathologic factors in 122 patients with resected pancreatic and ileal neuroendocrine tumors from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Recent population-based studies have demonstrated significant differences in outcome between patients with pancreatic and ileal neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this study was to examine the clinicopathologic differences between ileal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors following resection.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed and data on clinicopathologic variables, biochemical markers, and follow-up of patients with resected ileal (INETs) and pancreatic (PNETs) neuroendocrine tumors were collected. The t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2010, 122 patients with PNETs and INETs were explored (70 PNETs and 52 INETs). Several variables were found to be significantly different between patients in both groups. INETs were more often associated with flushing (44 vs. 14%; P < 0.001) and diarrhea (63 vs. 16%; P < 0.001) and were more often associated with elevation in preoperative serum levels of pancreastatin (88 vs. 42%; P < 0.001), chromogranin A (78 vs. 54%; P = 0.036), and serotonin (90 vs. 43%; P < 0.001). INETs more frequently had vascular invasion on pathology (96 vs. 60%; P < 0.001), and presented more often with nodal and/or distant metastases (77 vs. 37%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In this series, patients with INETs presented with a more advanced stage of disease compared with PNETs, had higher preoperative levels of 3 markers, and were more often symptomatic. Despite these factors, there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with these 2 tumor types.

Refractory gastroesophageal variceal bleeding secondary to neuroendocrine carcinoma in the pancreatic tail

The main cause of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB) is portal hypertension (PH) due to liver cirrhosis. Here, we report a case of regional PH and refractory GEVB secondary to neuroendocrine carcinoma (NC) in the pancreatic tail. This condition was treated using a pancreatic tail resection, splenectomy, and portal azygous devascularization. Regional PH caused by a pancreatic NC is rare and is usually presented as isolated gastric varices. This case report of regional PH details simultaneous esophageal and gastric varices that were caused by a pancreatic NC, which is a rare occurrence. Therefore, after excluding liver cirrhosis, unusual causes should be considered in cases of refractory GEVB with PH. and IAP.

Circulating biomarkers in neuroendocrine tumors of the enteropancreatic tract: application to diagnosis, monitoring disease, and as prognostic indicators

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are difficult to diagnose. Their symptoms may be vague or intermittent, and are frequently associated with much more common diseases; many of the tumors may be asymptomatic. Therefore, diagnosis can be delayed for some years. Because most NETs are secretory, the measurement of circulating biomarkers is helpful not only for diagnosis but also for assessing tumor response to treatment, monitoring disease progression, and use as prognostic indicators.