The effects of patient participation-based dietary intervention on nutritional and functional status for patients with gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37:E10-E20. [PMID: 23632471 DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31829193c8]

Effectiveness of the CANCER-AIMS intervention on nutritional status and symptom management in patients with gastric cancer following gastrectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Dietary education and modification interventions are valuable and feasible strategies for enhancing nutritional status and managing symptoms in patients with gastric cancer following gastrectomy. In alignment with administrative policies prioritizing shorter hospital stays and enhanced postoperative self-management, the provision of a simplified nutritional management approach following gastrectomy holds promise for preventing weight loss and expanding resources for monitoring both the nutritional and symptomatic aspects of these patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of an integrative approach involving the five sequential steps of Conversation, Assessment, Nutrition plan, Complications, Evaluation, and Reassurance or Removal (CANCER) into Altering Intake and Managing Symptoms (AIMS), with specific focus on enhancing nutritional status and symptom management.

DESIGN

A single-blind, two-arm, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Shandong province, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group received a 16-week CANCER-AIMS intervention program. The control group received usual routine care dietary guidance. Questionnaires and electronic medical records of each patient were used to assess dietary intake, dietary symptoms, and subjective and objective nutritional status. Outcomes were assessed at four specific time points: the day before discharge and at 4-, 8-, and 16-weeks following hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight participants completed the study. The findings revealed significant interaction effects between group and time for dietary intake, dietary symptoms, and nutritional status between intervention and control groups (P < 0.001). The intervention group had significantly higher dietary intake, fewer dietary symptoms, and better nutritional status post-intervention than the control group (P < 0.001). Moreover, there were significant differences in dietary intake, dietary symptoms, and nutritional status according to time in both the intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSION

The CANCER-AIMS intervention for patients with gastric cancer following gastrectomy may be efficient at enhancing nutritional intake, reducing negative dietary symptoms, and thus improving both their subjective and objective nutritional status.

Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility and effectiveness of digital therapeutics for supportive care after gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The study included 39 patients with gastric cancer who underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy and were able to use a mobile application (app) on their smartphones. The developed research app automatically calculates and provides daily targets for calorie and protein intake based on the patient's body mass index (BMI). Patients recorded their daily diets, weights, and symptoms in the app and completed special questionnaires to assess the feasibility of the app in real-world clinical practice.

RESULTS

At the 10-week follow-up, the mean questionnaire scores for ease of learning, usability, and effectiveness of the app (primary endpoint) were 2.32±0.41, 2.35±0.43, and 2.4±0.39 (range: 0-3), respectively. Patients were classified as underweight (<18.5, n=4), normal (18.5-24.9, n=24), or overweight (≥25.0, n=11) according to predischarge BMI. Underweight patients showed higher compliance with app usage and a higher rate of achieving the target calorie and protein intake than normal weight and overweight patients (98% vs. 77% vs. 81%, p=0.0313; 102% vs. 75% vs. 61%, P=0.0111; 106% vs. 79% vs. 64%, P=0.0429). Two patients transitioned from underweight to normal weight (50.0%), one patient (4.3%) transitioned from normal weight to underweight, and two patients (22.2%) transitioned from overweight to normal weight.

CONCLUSIONS

The mobile app is feasible and useful for postoperative supportive care in terms of ease of learning, usability, and effectiveness. Digital therapeutics may be an effective way to provide supportive care for postgastrectomy patients, particularly in terms of nutrition.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04800991.

Impact of malnutrition and nutritional support after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer

Malnutrition, characterized by altered body composition and impaired function, is particularly prevalent among gastric cancer patients, affecting up to 60% of them. Malnutrition in these patients can manifest both before and after surgery, due to factors such as gastric outlet obstruction, cancer cachexia, and anatomical changes. Notably, total gastrectomy (TG) presents the most significant nutritional challenges. However, function-preserving gastrectomy, such as pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG), have shown promise in improving nutritional outcomes. Effective nutritional risk screening and assessment are vital for identifying patients at risk. Nutritional support not only improves nutritional parameters but also reduces complications, enhances quality of life (QoL) and survival rates. Those unable to maintain more than 50% of the recommended intake for over 7 days are recommended for nutritional support. Common methods of nutritional support include oral nutrition supplements (ONS), enteral nutrition (EN), or parenteral nutrition (PN) depending on the patient's status. Effect of perioperative nutritional support remains controversial. Preoperative interventions including ONS and PN have shown mixed results, with selective benefits in patients with sarcopenia or hypoalbuminaemia, while impact of EN in gastric outlet obstruction patients have been positive. In contrast postoperative support appears to be consistent. Tube feeding after TG has shown improvements, and ONS have been effective in reducing weight loss and improving nutritional biomarkers. PN was also associated with benefits such as weight maintenance and QoL. This review explores the mechanisms, assessment, and clinical impact of malnutrition, emphasizing the importance of nutritional support in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Effectiveness of weight-loss prevention with continual nutrition counseling in postoperative outpatients with stage IA and IB gastric cancer

Outpatient nutritional counseling by a registered dietitian is often performed to prevent weight loss, but evidence supporting this practice is insufficient. In this study, we aimed to clarify the effectiveness of four-time outpatient nutritional counseling in weight-loss prevention compared with conventional intervention limited to one-time nutritional counseling. This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. The target population was postoperative patients with stage IA and IB gastric cancer. Groups that received one-time and four-time nutritional counseling included patients who underwent gastrectomy from May 2014 to April 2017 and May 2017 to December 2019, respectively. The one-time group received counseling at discharge; the four-time group received counseling at discharge, at the first outpatient visit, and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. There were 58 patients in the one-time group and 27 patients in the four-time group, with a significant difference in length of hospital stay (p = 0.042). Thirty-six patients (62.1%) in the one-time nutritional counseling group and 12 (44.4%) in the four-time group had a weight loss of 5% or more from hospital discharge to 6 months postoperatively. The adjusted risk ratio for the effectiveness of four counseling sessions compared with one session was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.35-1.34). In subgroup analysis, the effect of nutritional guidance was greater for patients with body mass index ≥23 kg/m2, but this depended on the outcome and number of cases, and there was no essential difference between the groups. In postoperative patients with stage IA and stage IB gastric cancer, four sessions of outpatient nutrition counseling may be not superior to one counseling session in preventing weight loss.

The effect of nurse-led empowering education on nutrition impact side effects in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effect of empowering education on patient-reported outcomes and morbidity.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was conducted on adults with colorectal cancer (43 + 40). The intervention consisted of one-hour empowering patient education on nutrition impact side effects. The effect was compared with standard care. The difference between the groups was analysed pre and post intervention.

RESULTS

The change in malnutrition-related knowledge level was higher in the intervention group compared to control group (median 0.0, IQR 1.00 vs median 0.0, IQR 0.0, p = 0.028). Additional contacts with outpatient clinic were fewer in intervention group (median 0.00, IQR 0.00) compared to control group (median 1.00, IQR 2.00, p < 0.001). We did not find a statistically significant difference in the change in activation level, risk of malnutrition and quality of life between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Empowering education may affect positively on patients' knowledge level related to malnutrition and reduce the number of additional contacts with health care thus reduce health care costs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Empowering education may be used in patients with colorectal cancer to improve knowledge and reduce additional contacts with health care. Further research is needed on the effect of empowering education in self-care.

Effects of individualized dietary counseling on nutritional status and quality of life in post-discharge patients after surgery for gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial

Background

Currently, the supporting evidence for dietary counseling is insufficient. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of individualized dietary counseling on nutritional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.

Methods

This study was a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. The patients after surgery for gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group and the control group. In the intervention group, patients receive individualized dietary counseling based on individual calorie needs and symptom assessment at 24 h before discharge, 14, 21, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. Patients in the control group received routine dietary counseling. The primary endpoint was body mass index (BMI) loss at 30, 60, and 90 days after surgery; the secondary endpoints were calorie and protein intake at 30 and 60 days after surgery, blood parameters, the 90-day readmission rate, and QOL at 90 days after surgery.

Results

One hundred thirty patients were enrolled; 67 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 63 patients to the control group. Compared with the control group, patients in the intervention group were significantly less BMI loss at 30 days (-0.84 ± 0.65 vs. -1.29 ± 0.83), 60 days (-1.29 ± 0.92 vs. -1.77 ± 1.13), and 90 days (-1.37 ± 1.05 vs. -1.92 ± 1.66) after surgery (all P< 0.05). Subgroups analysis by surgery type showed that the intervention could significantly reduce BMI loss in patients undergoing total and proximal gastrectomy at 30 days (-0.75 ± 0.47 vs. -1.55 ± 1.10), 60 days (-1.59 ± 1.02 vs. -2.55 ± 1.16), and 90 days (-1.44 ± 1.19 vs. -3.26 ± 1.46) after surgery (all P< 0.05). At 60 days after surgery, calorie goals were reached in 35 patients (77.8%) in the intervention group and 14 patients (40.0%) in the control group (P = 0.001), and protein goals were reached in 40 patients (88.9%) in the intervention group and 17 patients (48.6%) in the control group (P< 0.001). Regarding the QOL at 90 days after surgery, the patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower level of fatigue, shortness of breath and stomach pain, better physical function, and cognitive function (P< 0.05).

Conclusions

Post-discharge individualized dietary counseling is an effective intervention to reduce post-gastrectomy patient weight loss and to elevate calorie intake, protein intake, and QOL.

Opportunities for Patient Participation in Perioperative Malnutrition Care: A Qualitative Study

Introduction

In the perioperative period of hospitalization, barriers to food intake are common due to special nutritional needs, compromised nutritional status, and metabolic stress. Good nutritional care call for an interdisciplinary approach. And patients themselves may also play an essential role in managing nutritional care.

Objective

This study aimed to explore how patients with malnutrition experience nutritional care, their perspectives on patient participation, and their own role in malnutrition care in the perioperative period of hospitalization.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted using an interpretive phenomenological approach. To follow patients' experiences, in-depth longitudinal interviews were undertaken before, during, and after hospitalization. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically using open, axial, and selective coding and interpreted in an iterative process.

Results

Fifty-six interviews were undertaken with 26 patients with malnutrition scheduled for surgery and during the perioperative period of hospitalization. Four themes were identified: (1) unawareness and stigmata about being malnourished, (2) feasibility of optimal nutritional care, (3) needs and expectations for self-management, and (4) barriers and facilitators of taking own responsibilities in nutritional care.

Conclusion

Awareness and responsiveness to patients' perspectives, motivation, and compliance are prerequisites for patient participation in malnutrition care. This requires good communication between healthcare professionals and patients in all phases of hospitalization.

The Impact of Nutritional Support on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated with Chemotherapy

Malnutrition and cachexia occur commonly in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study elucidated the effect of nutritional support (NS) on survival outcomes among patients with AGC undergoing chemotherapy. We retrospectively evaluated new AGC cases at our institute between January 2015 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were unresectable or recurrent chemotherapy-treated gastric adenocarcinoma, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated, and univariate and multivariate analyses identified prognostic factors. A total of 103 eligible patients were separated into groups: 69 patients (67%) into NS and 34 (33%) into routine care (RC). The median follow-up time was 11.0 mo, (0.5-92). NS was offered to patients with poorer PS (p = 0.03), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) positivity (p = 0.001), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (cut-off ≤ 3, p = 0.02). Median OS and TTF in the RC and NS groups were 11.6 and 10.4 mo, (p = 0.99) and 4.2 and 5.5 mo, (p = 0.07), respectively. Multivariate analyses identified NS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53, p = 0.01) and GPS positivity for TTF, and low body mass index (HR = 2.03, p = 0.007) and GPS positivity (HR = 2.25, p = 0.001) for OS as significant prognostic factors. Thus, NS with chemotherapy is a potentially effective intervention for AGC.

A systematic review of nurse-led dietary interventions for cancer patients and survivors

Dietary problems are frequently reported in cancer patients and survivors which may reduce quality of life and cancer survival. Nurses' role in dietary management is recognized as important, but review evidence on nurse-led dietary interventions for cancer patients and survivors is lacking. This review aims to summarize evidence on nurse-led dietary interventions for cancer patients and survivors. Ten electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid, CNKI, Wan Fang, CQVIP, Index to Taiwan Periodical Literature System) were searched from inception dates to November 11, 2021, using the key search terms "cancer/nutrition/nurse-led/intervention." Eligible studies were experimental studies on nurse-led dietary interventions for improving dietary intake in cancer patients and survivors published in peer-reviewed journals in English or Chinese. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Data were extracted and summarized descriptively. Three randomized controlled trials on nurse-led dietary counseling published between 2005 and 2018 were included, with an overall high risk of bias. Two studies found positive intervention effects in improving fruit and vegetable intake, while the other study demonstrated an increase in energy intake. This is the first systematic review to summarize the evidence on nurse-led dietary interventions for cancer patients and survivors. Although available studies are limited, a positive trend was identified in that nurse-led dietary interventions are effective in increasing dietary intake in cancer patients and survivors. Additional studies in this field are required to further explore nurses' role in the development of nutritional oncology care.

Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation

BACKGROUND

Health services have traditionally been developed to focus on specific diseases or medical specialties. Involving consumers as partners in planning, delivering and evaluating health services may lead to services that are person-centred and so better able to meet the needs of and provide care for individuals. Globally, governments recommend consumer involvement in healthcare decision-making at the systems level, as a strategy for promoting person-centred health services. However, the effects of this 'working in partnership' approach to healthcare decision-making are unclear. Working in partnership is defined here as collaborative relationships between at least one consumer and health provider, meeting jointly and regularly in formal group formats, to equally contribute to and collaborate on health service-related decision-making in real time. In this review, the terms 'consumer' and 'health provider' refer to partnership participants, and 'health service user' and 'health service provider' refer to trial participants. This review of effects of partnership interventions was undertaken concurrently with a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) entitled Consumers and health providers working in partnership for the promotion of person-centred health services: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership, as an intervention to promote person-centred health services.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases from 2000 to April 2019; PROQUEST Dissertations and Theses Global from 2016 to April 2019; and grey literature and online trial registries from 2000 until September 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs of 'working in partnership' interventions meeting these three criteria: both consumer and provider participants meet; they meet jointly and regularly in formal group formats; and they make actual decisions that relate to the person-centredness of health service(s).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened most titles and abstracts. One review author screened a subset of titles and abstracts (i.e. those identified through clinical trials registries searches, those classified by the Cochrane RCT Classifier as unlikely to be an RCT, and those identified through other sources). Two review authors independently screened all full texts of potentially eligible articles for inclusion. In case of disagreement, they consulted a third review author to reach consensus. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias for all included studies and a second review author independently cross-checked all data and assessments. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion, or by consulting a third review author to reach consensus. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the small number of included trials and their heterogeneity; we synthesised results descriptively by comparison and outcome. We reported the following outcomes in GRADE 'Summary of findings' tables: health service alterations; the degree to which changed service reflects health service user priorities; health service users' ratings of health service performance; health service users' health service utilisation patterns; resources associated with the decision-making process; resources associated with implementing decisions; and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials (one RCT and four cluster-RCTs), with 16,257 health service users and more than 469 health service providers as trial participants. For two trials, the aims of the partnerships were to directly improve the person-centredness of health services (via health service planning, and discharge co-ordination). In the remaining trials, the aims were indirect (training first-year medical doctors on patient safety) or broader in focus (which could include person-centredness of health services that targeted the public/community, households or health service delivery to improve maternal and neonatal mortality). Three trials were conducted in high income-countries, one was in a middle-income country and one was in a low-income country. Two studies evaluated working in partnership interventions, compared to usual practice without partnership (Comparison 1); and three studies evaluated working in partnership as part of a multi-component intervention, compared to the same intervention without partnership (Comparison 2). No studies evaluated one form of working in partnership compared to another (Comparison 3). The effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership compared to usual practice without partnership are uncertain: only one of the two studies that assessed this comparison measured health service alteration outcomes, and data were not usable, as only intervention group data were reported. Additionally, none of the included studies evaluating this comparison measured the other primary or secondary outcomes we sought for the 'Summary of findings' table. We are also unsure about the effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership as part of a multi-component intervention compared to the same intervention without partnership. Very low-certainty evidence indicated there may be little or no difference on health service alterations or health service user health service performance ratings (two studies); or on health service user health service utilisation patterns and adverse events (one study each). No studies evaluating this comparison reported the degree to which health service alterations reflect health service user priorities, or resource use. Overall, our confidence in the findings about the effects of working in partnership interventions was very low due to indirectness, imprecision and publication bias, and serious concerns about risk of selection bias; performance bias, detection bias and reporting bias in most studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of consumers and providers working in partnership as an intervention, or as part of a multi-component intervention, are uncertain, due to a lack of high-quality evidence and/or due to a lack of studies. Further well-designed RCTs with a clear focus on assessing outcomes directly related to partnerships for patient-centred health services are needed in this area, which may also benefit from mixed-methods and qualitative research to build the evidence base.

Nutritional Support Indications in Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients: From Perioperative to Palliative Systemic Therapy. A Comprehensive Review of the Last Decade

Gastric cancer treatments are rapidly evolving, leading to significant survival benefit. Recent evidence provided by clinical trials strongly encouraged the use of perioperative chemotherapy as standard treatment for the localized disease, whereas in the advanced disease setting, molecular characterization has improved patients’ selection for tailored therapeutic approaches, including molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The role of nutritional therapy is widely recognized, with oncologic treatment’s tolerance and response being better in well-nourished patients. In this review, literature data on strategies or nutritional interventions will be critically examined, with particular regard to different treatment phases (perioperative, metastatic, and palliative settings), with the aim to draw practical indications for an adequate nutritional support of gastric cancer patients and provide an insight on future directions in nutritional strategies. We extensively analyzed the last 10 years of literature, in order to provide evidence that may fit current clinical practice both in terms of nutritional interventions and oncological treatment. Overall, 137 works were selected: 34 Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs), 12 meta-analysis, 9 reviews, and the most relevant prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies in this setting. Eleven ongoing trials have been selected from clinicaltrial.gov as representative of current research. One limitation of our work lies in the heterogeneity of the described studies, in terms of sample size, study procedures, and both nutritional and clinical outcomes. Indeed, to date, there are no specific evidence-based guidelines in this fields, therefore we proposed a clinical algorithm with the aim to indicate an appropriate nutritional strategy for gastric cancer patients.

Nutritional Intervention Improves Nutrition Outcomes in Stomach and Colon Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: Finding from a Quasi-Experiment in Vietnam

Background: Evidence on the effects of nutritional interventions on gastrointestinal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy is not well documented. This study aims to assess the effects of nutritional intervention in patients diagnosed with stomach and colon cancer receiving chemotherapy in Vietnam. Methods: A quasi-experiment with intervention and control groups for pre- and post-intervention was carried out in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in a university hospital in Vietnam. Patients in the intervention group were provided nutritional counseling, personalized specific dietary advice, and received oral nutrition supplements (ONSs) while patients in the control group only received nutrition counseling. Results: The weight in the intervention and control group after 2 months increased significantly by 1.4 ± 2.6 kg and 0.4 ± 2.3 kg, respectively. Muscle mass increased by 1.2 ± 4.1 cm in the intervention group, while those in the control group decreased by 0.55 ± 2.77 cm. There was no statistical significance between two groups after intervention in terms of Mid–Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) and percentage of fat. The percentage of malnutrition based on the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Body Mass Index (BMI) declined after the intervention in both groups. According to the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) using the propensity score matching and DiD method, participants receiving the intervention were more likely to have a higher score of weight (Coef = 0.84; 95%CI = 0.47; 2.16) and muscle mass (Coef = 1.08; 95%CI = 0.09; 2.06) between pre- and post-intervention. By contrast, the PG-SGA scores on treated participants were more likely to decrease after the intervention (Coef = −1.28; 95%CI = −4.39; −0.84). After matching, being female, living in rural areas, or having stomach cancer were still positively related to being moderately/severely malnourished by the PG-SGA, and these findings were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The nutritional interventions had a positive effect on weight gain, muscle mass, and reduced malnutrition. Further studies with a longer follow-up duration are needed to confirm the effects of the intervention.

Nutritional Outcomes of Thoracic Duct Resection for Radical Esophagectomy by Assessing Body Composition Changes in One Year: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Thoracic duct (TD) resection is performed when the tumor or a metastatic lymph node directly invades the TD, and is sometimes indicated for radical lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. However, the effect of TD resection on nutritional status has not been established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 174 consecutive patients from October 2015 to March 2019 who underwent radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in Toranomon Hospital were classified into thoracic duct preserved group (n = 51) and TD-resected (TD-R) group (n = 123). We compared laboratory data, body composition data from bioelectrical impedance analysis measured preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months after surgery, and postoperative complications between the two groups.

RESULTS

Clinical stage was significantly more advanced in the TD-R group. Total body weight, body mass index, and fat mass continuously decreased in the two groups over 12 months after surgery, and the decreases were statistically greater in the TD-R group at 12 months after surgery. Skeletal muscle mass and fat-free mass decreased over 1 month after surgery and stayed in a reduced state until 12 months after surgery without statistically significant differences between the two groups. TD resection did not increase incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade III), but TD resection increased incidence of chylothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that loss of body fat mass, which was a main contributor to body weight loss, was accelerated in the TD-R group, but TD resection does not deteriorate loss of muscle mass at 12 months after surgery.

Effects of nursing nutrition interventions on outcomes in malnourished hospital inpatients and nursing home residents: A systematic review

CONTEXT

Malnutrition in institutionalized patients is associated with adverse outcomes and increased costs. Nurses have a crucial role in the recognition and treatment of malnutrition and empowering patients in nutritional care.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review provides an overview of the effectiveness of nursing nutritional interventions to counteract malnutrition.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained through a systematic search in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science databases from inception to February 15^th 2018.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were eligible for inclusion when published in English, Spanish or German. Primary outcome parameters were nutritional status and dietary intake.

DATA ANALYSIS

The Evidence analysis checklist from the American Dietetic Association and GRADE were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Out of 8162 studies, fifteen studies were included in the study, representing nine hospitals and six long-term care facilities. Two main categories of nursing nutrition interventions were identified; the implementation of 1) a nursing nutrition plan focusing on nursing actions in nutritional care or 2) nursing assistance in feeding support, mostly during mealtimes. Studies were heterogeneous and of most of them of low quality. This hampered drawing conclusions on effectiveness of nursing nutrition interventions on malnutrition related outcomes in clinical care. Nevertheless, six out of 15 studies reported a slightly improved nutritional status and/or clinical outcomes as a result of the interventions.

CONCLUSION

This review identified two categories of nursing nutrition interventions to counteract malnutrition. Their effectiveness needs to be further evaluated in future studies. Tweetable abstract: Systematic review of effective Nursing Nutrition Interventions in the management of malnutrition in hospital and nursing home care.

Oral nutrition interventions in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer: A systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Weight loss and poor food intake have been shown to affect several outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. This review aims to examine the effect of pre-, post- or perioperative nutrition interventions focused on increasing oral energy or protein intake in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Interventions using standard oral nutrition supplements and/or dietary counselling were included. The primary outcome was weight change, and secondary outcomes were energy and protein intake. A secondary aim was to examine this effect in malnourished patients.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched from inception to September 2019 for relevant randomised controlled trials. Study quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised trials. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies assessed patients undergoing surgery for gastric, colorectal, oesophageal and pancreatic cancers. The interventions studied included oral nutrition supplements and/or dietary counselling. Five studies reported preoperative interventions; five studies reported post-operative interventions; six studies reported post-discharge interventions; and two studies reported perioperative interventions. Overall, low or very low quality evidence was found to support the use of oral nutrition supplements to positively influence weight and increase energy and protein intake in the preoperative period and immediate post-operative period. Very low quality evidence was found to support the use of oral nutrition interventions to influence weight, energy or protein intake in the post-discharge period. Very limited evidence with high risk of bias was found to support positive effects of nutrition intervention in malnourished patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates limited evidence for the use of oral nutrition supplements to increase intake and positively influence weight in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Overall, results were heterogeneous leading to inconsistent results. Further research into optimal nutrition support interventions and timing of interventions is required.

End-user perceptions of a patient- and family-centred intervention to improve nutrition intake among oncology patients: a descriptive qualitative analysis

Background

People with cancer are at high risk of malnutrition. Nutrition education is an effective strategy to improve patient outcomes, however, little is known regarding the impact of family and/or carer involvement in nutrition education and requires investigation. The purpose of the study was to evaluate PIcNIC (Partnering with families to promote nutrition in cancer care) intervention acceptability from the perspective of patients, families and health care providers.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative study was undertaken at an inpatient and an outpatient hospital setting in Australia and an outpatient/home setting in Hong Kong. A patient-and-family centred intervention including nutrition education, goals setting/nutrition plans, and food diaries, was delivered to patients and/or families in the inpatient, outpatient or home setting. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore perceptions of the intervention. 64 participants were interviewed; 20 patients, 15 family members, and 29 health care professionals. Data were analysed using deductive and inductive content analysis.

Results

Two categories were identified; 1) ‘context and intervention acceptability’; and 2) ‘benefits of patient- and family-centred nutrition care’. Within each category redundant concepts were identified. For category 1 the redundant concepts were: the intervention works in outpatient settings, the food diary is easy but needs to be tailored, the information booklet is a good resource, and the intervention should be delivered by a dietitian, but could be delivered by a nurse. The redundant concepts for category 2 were: a personalised nutrition plan is required, patient and family involvement in the intervention is valued and the intervention has benefits for patients and families. Converging and diverging perceptions across participant groups and settings were identified.

Conclusions

In this paper we have described an acceptable patient- and family-centred nutrition intervention, which may be effective in increasing patient and family engagement in nutrition care and may result in improved nutrition intakes. Our study highlights important contextual considerations for nutrition education; the outpatient and home setting are optimal for engaging patients and families in learning opportunities.

Effects of nutritional interventions on nutritional status in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nutritional interventions may improve quality of life, morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer (GC) patients. A growing number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated different nutritional strategies - oral nutritional supplements (ONS), enteral nutrition (EN), enteral immunonutrition (EIN), parenteral nutrition (PN) and nutritional counselling - in GC patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effects of these nutritional interventions on nutritional status of GC patients undergoing gastrectomy and/or chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases from inception to March 2020, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect sizes were estimated with mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I²) based on chi-squared test. Pooled analyses and quality assessment were performed with Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 25 RCTs were identified, including ONS (n = 7), EN (n = 6), PN (n = 4), EIN (n = 5) and nutrition counselling (n = 3) interventions. Ten RCTs with 1838 patients were deemed eligible for pooled analyses. Body weight loss was found lower in ONS group versus control group (MD 0.77; 95% CI -0.02-1.56; p = 0.05). PN and EIN studies did not assess body weight, while all nutrition counselling studies did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Twenty-three out of 25 studies evaluated serum protein levels - albumin (ALB) and/or prealbumin (PA) and/or transferrin (TF). ALB levels did not significantly differ (p > 0.05) in 4 ONS studies. Significant improvements of PA levels from baseline to postoperative day (POD) ≥ 7 were shown in EN compared with PN groups (MD 19.90; 95% CI 10.09-29.70; p < 0.0001). Compared with EN, EIN interventions showed no significant improvements of ALB, PA and TF levels (p > 0.05) from baseline to POD ≥ 7. Amino-acid enriched PN showed no significant improvements of ALB, PA and TF levels (p > 0.05) while the effect of omega-3 enriched PN was debated. Only three studies out of 25 evaluated total fat mass and skeletal muscle mass and no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between ONS versus control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas our meta-analysis showed promising results from ONS and EN interventions the optimal delivery of GC nutritional support and nutritional status assessment are still unclear. Moreover, the majority of studies did not consider muscle mass and strength as nutritional parameters. This review highlights the crucial need to close this research gap, with high-quality, large RCTs, adopting effective nutritional assessment tools to evaluate the appropriateness of nutrition strategies.

Defining Patient Engagement in Research: Results of a Systematic Review and Analysis: Report of the ISPOR Patient-Centered Special Interest Group

OBJECTIVES

Lack of clarity on the definition of "patient engagement" has been highlighted as a barrier to fully implementing patient engagement in research. This study identified themes within existing definitions related to patient engagement and proposes a consensus definition of "patient engagement in research."

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify definitions of patient engagement and related terms in published literature (2006-2018). Definitions were extracted and qualitatively analyzed to identify themes and characteristics. A multistakeholder approach, including academia, industry, and patient representation, was taken at all stages. A proposed definition is offered based on a synthesis of the findings.

RESULTS

Of 1821 abstracts identified and screened for eligibility, 317 were selected for full-text review. Of these, 169 articles met inclusion criteria, from which 244 distinct definitions were extracted for analysis. The most frequently defined terms were: "patient-centered" (30.5%), "patient engagement" (15.5%), and "patient participation" (13.4%). The majority of definitions were specific to the healthcare delivery setting (70.5%); 11.9% were specific to research. Among the definitions of "patient engagement," the most common themes were "active process," "patient involvement," and "patient as participant." In the research setting, the top themes were "patient as partner," "patient involvement," and "active process"; these did not appear in the top 3 themes of nonresearch definitions.

CONCLUSION

Distinct themes are associated with the term "patient engagement" and with engagement in the "research" setting. Based on an analysis of existing literature and review by patient, industry, and academic stakeholders, we propose a scalable consensus definition of "patient engagement in research."

Midterm body composition changes after open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluated midterm changes in body composition after open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

Data from 138 gastric cancer patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital between January 2011 and December 2012 were collected and reviewed. Patients with pathological stage I gastric cancer and with no comorbidities at diagnosis were enrolled. Body composition data from segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis were obtained preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean body weight losses at 1 and 3 years after surgery were 6.1 kg and 5.8 kg, respectively (P < 0.001). The protein mass, skeletal muscle mass, and fat-free mass decreased continuously until 3 years after surgery (0.5 kg, 1.6 kg, and 2.4 kg, respectively; P < 0.001). The average body fat mass and visceral fat area loss at 1 year after surgery were 4.7 kg and 20.5 cm2, respectively (P < 0.001). After 1 postoperative year, the body fat mass and visceral fat areas increased continuously, up to 12.2 kg and 74.2 cm2 at 3 years after surgery, respectively (+1.4 kg and +1.2 cm2, respectively).

CONCLUSION

More intense nutritional and exercise programs may be important after gastric cancer surgery, especially during the first postoperative year.

Effect of perioperative oral nutritional supplementation in malnourished patients who undergo gastrectomy: A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a perioperative oral nutritional supplement in malnourished patients who undergo gastrectomy.

METHODS

Patients who were determined as being moderately or severely malnourished according to a patient-generated subjective global assessment or who had a body mass index <18.5, were enrolled. The oral nutritional supplement group received 500 mL/d of standard oral nutritional supplement for 2 weeks before gastrectomy and for 4 weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint was postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥II). The secondary endpoints included body weight changes, biochemical parameters, and quality of life survey results.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients (65 in the oral nutritional supplement group and 62 in the control group) were enrolled. The complication rates were not significantly different (29.2% versus 37.1%, P = .346). However, the incidences of overall complications, complications persisting until postoperative week 3 or 5, and severe complications (grade ≥IIIa) were significantly lower in the oral nutritional supplement group for patients with patient-generated subjective global assessment grade C. Total lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the oral nutritional supplement group at postoperative weeks 3 and 5. For most patients, oral nutritional supplement was well tolerated preoperatively. However, only 26.2% and 50.8% of the patients in the oral nutritional supplement group could consume >250 mL/d of oral nutritional supplement postoperatively during the 2nd and 4th weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine application of perioperative oral nutritional supplement is not recommended for malnourished patients receiving gastrectomy. However, perioperative standard oral nutritional supplement administration may reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of complications after gastrectomy in severely malnourished patients (patient-generated subjective global assessment grade C).

Dependent functional status is associated with unplanned postoperative intubation after elective cervical spine surgery: a national registry analysis

PURPOSE

The impact of preoperative functional status on 30-day unplanned postoperative intubation and clinical outcomes among patients who underwent cervical spine surgery is not well-described. We hypothesized that functional dependence is associated with 30-day unplanned postoperative intubation and that among the reintubated cohort, functional dependence is associated with adverse postoperative clinical outcomes after cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

Utilizing the 2007-2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified adult elective anterior and posterior cervical spine surgery patients by Current Procedural Terminology codes. We performed (1) a Cox Proportional Hazard analysis for the following outcomes: reintubation, prolonged ventilator use, and pneumonia and (2) an adjusted logistic regression analysis among patients that required postoperative reintubation to evaluate the association of functional status with adverse postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The sample size was 26,263, of which 550 (2.1%) were functionally dependent. The adjusted model suggested that when compared with functionally independent patients, dependent patients were at increased risk of unplanned 30-day intubation (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.26-3.34; P = 0.003). The adjusted risk of 30-day postoperative pneumonia was significantly higher in patients with functional dependence (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.54, P = 0.036). Among patients that required postoperative reintubation, the odds of 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with functional dependence (OR 5.82, 95% CI 1.59-23.4, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative functional dependence is a good marker for estimating postoperative unplanned intubation following cervical spine surgery.

Nutritional risk assessment and dietary guidance in postoperative patients with gastric cancer on chemotherapy

AIM

To investigate the nutritional status of postoperative patients with gastric cancer on chemotherapy and to provide timely dietary guidance and nutritional support for these patients.

METHODS

Patients who received curative resection for gastric cancer and were on chemotherapy at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from September 2014 to March 2016 were included. The patients were assessed by unified training investigators within 48 h after hospitalization. The questionnaires such as the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and the Chemotherapy Side Effects of Patients with Gastric Cancer Questionnaire were used to assess the nutritional status of patients.

RESULTS

The difference in the nutritional status of patients on different stages of chemotherapy was statistically significant (P < 0.05). With the increase in the number of chemotherapy cycles, the nutritional status of patients became worse. Anorexia was the most common diet-related symptom, and the rates of anorexia in patients on early, medium and late stages of chemotherapy were 34.95%, 56.31%, and 75.73%, respectively. Patients acquired diet knowledge mainly from medical staff. The proportions of patients who acquired diet knowledge from medical staff on early, medium and late stages of chemotherapy were 92.23%, 79.61%, and 75.73%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With the increase in the number of chemotherapy cycles, the nutritional status of patients becomes worse. Medical staff should provide timely, effective dietary guidance to improve the nutritional status and clinical outcome of patients.

Survival impact of postoperative body mass index in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The relationship between preoperative body mass index (BMI) and the survival of postoperative gastric cancer patients is not clear. Furthermore, the survival impact with postoperative BMI is not known, even though weight loss is inevitable after gastrectomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2000 and 2008 were included in the study (n = 1909). Patients were divided into three groups based on their BMIs: low (<18.5 kg/m(2)), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), and high BMI (≥ 25.0 kg/m(2)). Patient survival was compared according to BMI at two time points: baseline and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Regarding BMI 1 year after surgery, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival were longer in the high BMI group than the low and normal BMI groups. In a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the patient's age, sex, type of surgery, tumour stage, histology, curative resection, and BMI at baseline, a high BMI 1 year after surgery was associated with lower overall mortality compared to normal BMI (hazard ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.98). However, BMI at baseline was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

BMI 1 year after surgery significantly predicted the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer compared with the preoperative BMI.

Impact of whole course nursing intervention on quality of life in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer

AIM: To explore the impact of whole course nursing interventions on quality of life in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at the Yaounde City People's Hospital from June 2011 to April 2014 were randomly divided into either an intervention group or a control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was given routine care, and the intervention group was given whole course nursing intervention. Quality of life was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: After nursing care, quality of life score and care satisfaction score in the intervention group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05), and the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and depression rating scale (SDS) scores were significantly higher in the control group than in the observation group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Whole course nursing interventions in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy is feasible and can improve the quality of life and bad mood.

Effects of intensive nutrition education on nutritional status and quality of life among postgastrectomy patients

Purpose

We examined the effects of 3 months of intensive education (IE) after hospital discharge compared to conventional education (CE) on nutritional status and quality of diet and life among South Korean gastrectomy patients.

Methods

The study was conducted among 53 hospitalized gastrectomy in-patients (IE group, n = 28; CE group, n = 25) at Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong. Baseline data were collected from electronic medical records and additional information was gathered via anthropometric measurements, assessment of nutritional status through a patient-generated, subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), diet assessment, and measures of self-efficacy and satisfaction with meals for 3 months following hospital discharge.

Results

Total PG-SGA scores were significantly higher in the CE group than in the IE group at 3-week post-discharge (5.2 in the IE group vs. 10.4 in the CE group, P < 0.001), with higher scores indicating a greater severity of malnutrition. Energy intake over the 3 months increased in both the IE group (from 1,390 to 1,726 kcal/day) and the CE group (from 1,227 to 1,540 kcal/day). At 3-week post-discharge, the IE group had significantly higher daily protein and fat intake (P < 0.05). Self-efficacy improved in each category (P < 0.001), except for 'difficulty eating adequate food'. When assessing satisfaction with meals, there was a difference in the 'satisfaction with the current meal size' (P < 0.001) and 'satisfaction with the menu content' (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Nutritional status among gastrectomy patients in the IE group improved. Relative to the CE control, the IE group demonstrated improved self-efficacy and meal satisfaction 3-week post-discharge.

Health education improves quality of life outside the hospital in patients after total gastrectomy

AIM: To explore the significance of health education in the patients outside the hospital to improve the quality of life after total gastrectomy.

METHODS: One hundred patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent total gastrectomy at our hospital between April 2013 and April 2014 were randomly divided into either a study group or a control group, with 50 patients in each group. The study group was given continued health education outside the hospital, while the control group received routine care. The quality of life score and blood tests of the two groups were recorded.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor stage (TNM stage) and cardiovascular or respiratory diseases between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function, negative symptoms and other aspects one month after surgery (t = 0.829, 0.227, 0.446, 0.357, 0.295, 1.223, 1.112, 1.287, 0.111, 0.329, 1.980, 0.229, 0.723, 0.567, P > 0.05). However, three months after surgery, the physical features, such as quality of life, were significantly improved in the study group compared with the control group. The levels of negative symptoms in terms of overall health were also significantly better in the study group than in the control group (t = 2.345, 2.172, 2.118, 1.978, 1.885, 2.547, 3.779, 1.569, 2.509, 2.160, 2.980, 2.511, 2.151, P < 0.05). After three months, the weight, total protein and albumin were significantly better in the study group than in the control group (t = 2.673, 3.547, 3.981; P < 0.05), although blood hemoglobin showed no significant difference (t = 0.045, P > 0.05) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Continued health education can improve the quality of life outside the hospital in patients after total gastrectomy.