1
|
Jensen MSV, Eriksen VR, Rasmussen SS, Meyhoff CS, Aasvang EK. Time to detection of serious adverse events by continuous vital sign monitoring versus clinical practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2025; 69:e14541. [PMID: 39468756 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous vital sign monitoring detects far more severe vital sign deviations (SVDs) than intermittent clinical rounds, and deviations are to some extent related to subsequent serious adverse events (SAEs). Early detection of SAEs is pivotal to allow for effective interventions but the time relationship between detection of SAEs by continuous vital sign monitoring versus clinical practice is not well-described at the general ward. AIM To quantify the time difference between detection of SAEs by continuous vital sign monitoring and clinical suspicion of deterioration (CSD) in major abdominal surgery patients. METHODS Five hundred and five patients had their vital signs continuously monitored in combination with usual clinical practice consisting of National Early Warning Score assessments at least every 8'th hour, assessments during rounds, and other kinds of staff-patient interactions. The primary outcome was the time difference between the first chart note of CSD versus the first SVD, detected by continuous vital sign monitoring, in patients with a subsequent confirmed SAE during or up to 48 h after end of continuous vital sign monitoring. RESULTS Out of the 505 continuously monitored patients, 142 patients had a combination of both postoperative SAE, CSD and SVD, and thus were included in the primary analysis. The median time from the first SVD to SAE was 42.8 h (interquartile range 19.8-72.1 h) compared to 13 minutes (interquartile range - 4.8 to 3.5 h) for CSD with a median difference of 48.1 h (95% confidence interval 43.0-54.8 h), p-value < .001. CONCLUSION Continuous vital sign monitoring detects signs of oncoming SAEs in the form of SVD hours before CSD, potentially allowing for earlier and more effective treatments to reduce the extent of SAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Said Vang Jensen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Ramsgaard Eriksen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Straarup Rasmussen
- Biomedical Engineering, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Christian Sylvest Meyhoff
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eske Kvanner Aasvang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aagaard N, Aasvang EK, Meyhoff CS. Discrepancies between Promised and Actual AI Capabilities in the Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring of In-Hospital Patients: A Review of the Current Evidence. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:6497. [PMID: 39409537 PMCID: PMC11479359 DOI: 10.3390/s24196497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024]
Abstract
Continuous vital sign monitoring (CVSM) with wireless sensors in general hospital wards can enhance patient care. An artificial intelligence (AI) layer is crucial to allow sensor data to be managed by clinical staff without over alerting from the sensors. With the aim of summarizing peer-reviewed evidence for AI support in CVSM sensors, we searched PubMed and Embase for studies on adult patients monitored with CVSM sensors in general wards. Peer-reviewed evidence and white papers on the official websites of CVSM solutions were also included. AI classification was based on standard definitions of simple AI, as systems with no memory or learning capabilities, and advanced AI, as systems with the ability to learn from past data to make decisions. Only studies evaluating CVSM algorithms for improving or predicting clinical outcomes (e.g., adverse events, intensive care unit admission, mortality) or optimizing alarm thresholds were included. We assessed the promised level of AI for each CVSM solution based on statements from the official product websites. In total, 467 studies were assessed; 113 were retrieved for full-text review, and 26 studies on four different CVSM solutions were included. Advanced AI levels were indicated on the websites of all four CVSM solutions. Five studies assessed algorithms with potential for applications as advanced AI algorithms in two of the CVSM solutions (50%), while 21 studies assessed algorithms with potential as simple AI in all four CVSM solutions (100%). Evidence on algorithms for advanced AI in CVSM is limited, revealing a discrepancy between promised AI levels and current algorithm capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaj Aagaard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Eske K. Aasvang
- Department of Anaesthesia, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian S. Meyhoff
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kant N, Garssen SH, Vernooij CA, Mauritz GJ, Koning MV, Bosch FH, Doggen CJM. Enhancing discharge decision-making through continuous monitoring in an acute admission ward: a randomized controlled trial. Intern Emerg Med 2024; 19:1051-1061. [PMID: 38619713 PMCID: PMC11186918 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03582-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
In Acute Admission Wards, vital signs are commonly measured only intermittently. This may result in failure to detect early signs of patient deterioration and impede timely identification of patient stability, ultimately leading to prolonged stays and avoidable hospital admissions. Therefore, continuous vital sign monitoring may improve hospital efficacy. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of continuous monitoring on the proportion of patients safely discharged home directly from an Acute Admission Ward. Patients were randomized to either the control group, which received usual care, or the sensor group, which additionally received continuous monitoring using a wearable sensor. The continuous measurements could be considered in discharge decision-making by physicians during the daily bedside rounds. Safe discharge was defined as no unplanned readmissions, emergency department revisits or deaths, within 30 days after discharge. Additionally, length of stay, the number of Intensive Care Unit admissions and Rapid Response Team calls were assessed. In total, 400 patients were randomized, of which 394 completed follow-up, with 196 assigned to the sensor group and 198 to the control group. The proportion of patients safely discharged home was 33.2% in the sensor group and 30.8% in the control group (p = 0.62). No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes. The trial was terminated prematurely due to futility. In conclusion, continuous monitoring did not have an effect on the proportion of patients safely discharged from an Acute Admission Ward. Implementation challenges of continuous monitoring may have contributed to the lack of effect observed. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05181111 . Registered: January 6, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Kant
- Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd H Garssen
- Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Patient Care and Monitoring, Philips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn A Vernooij
- Department of Patient Care and Monitoring, Philips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Mauritz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mark V Koning
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H Bosch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carine J M Doggen
- Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Honarmand K, Wax RS, Penoyer D, Lighthall G, Danesh V, Rochwerg B, Cheatham ML, Davis DP, DeVita M, Downar J, Edelson D, Fox-Robichaud A, Fujitani S, Fuller RM, Haskell H, Inada-Kim M, Jones D, Kumar A, Olsen KM, Rowley DD, Welch J, Baldisseri MR, Kellett J, Knowles H, Shipley JK, Kolb P, Wax SP, Hecht JD, Sebat F. Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Recognizing and Responding to Clinical Deterioration Outside the ICU: 2023. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:314-330. [PMID: 38240510 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE Clinical deterioration of patients hospitalized outside the ICU is a source of potentially reversible morbidity and mortality. To address this, some acute care hospitals have implemented systems aimed at detecting and responding to such patients. OBJECTIVES To provide evidence-based recommendations for hospital clinicians and administrators to optimize recognition and response to clinical deterioration in non-ICU patients. PANEL DESIGN The 25-member panel included representatives from medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, patient/family partners, and clinician-methodologists with expertise in developing evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. METHODS We generated actionable questions using the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) format and performed a systematic review of the literature to identify and synthesize the best available evidence. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach to determine certainty in the evidence and to formulate recommendations and good practice statements (GPSs). RESULTS The panel issued 10 statements on recognizing and responding to non-ICU patients with critical illness. Healthcare personnel and institutions should ensure that all vital sign acquisition is timely and accurate (GPS). We make no recommendation on the use of continuous vital sign monitoring among unselected patients. We suggest focused education for bedside clinicians in signs of clinical deterioration, and we also suggest that patient/family/care partners' concerns be included in decisions to obtain additional opinions and help (both conditional recommendations). We recommend hospital-wide deployment of a rapid response team or medical emergency team (RRT/MET) with explicit activation criteria (strong recommendation). We make no recommendation about RRT/MET professional composition or inclusion of palliative care members on the responding team but suggest that the skill set of responders should include eliciting patients' goals of care (conditional recommendation). Finally, quality improvement processes should be part of a rapid response system. CONCLUSIONS The panel provided guidance to inform clinicians and administrators on effective processes to improve the care of patients at-risk for developing critical illness outside the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimia Honarmand
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Mackenzie Health, Vaughan, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Randy S Wax
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Critical Care, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Daleen Penoyer
- Center for Nursing Research and Advanced Nursing Practice, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Geoffery Lighthall
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Valerie Danesh
- Center for Applied Health Research, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Mackenzie Health, Vaughan, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael L Cheatham
- Division of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL
| | | | - Michael DeVita
- Columbia Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Medicine Harlem Hospital Medical Center, New York City, NY
| | - James Downar
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dana Edelson
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Alison Fox-Robichaud
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Shigeki Fujitani
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Raeann M Fuller
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Condell Medical Center, Libertyville, IL
| | | | - Matthew Inada-Kim
- Department of Acute Medicine, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Daryl Jones
- Division of Surgery, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anand Kumar
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Keith M Olsen
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Daniel D Rowley
- Respiratory Therapy Services, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - John Welch
- Critical Care Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marie R Baldisseri
- Department of Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - John Kellett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Heidi Knowles
- Department of Emergency Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, TX
| | - Jonathan K Shipley
- Division of Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Philipp Kolb
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, ON, Canada
| | - Sophie P Wax
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Hecht
- School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Frank Sebat
- Division of Internal Medicine, Mercy Medical Center, Redding, CA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Noort HHJ, Becking-Verhaar FL, Bahlman-van Ooijen W, Pel M, van Goor H, Huisman-de Waal G. Three Years of Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring on the General Surgical Ward: Is It Sustainable? A Qualitative Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:439. [PMID: 38256573 PMCID: PMC10816891 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of vital signs using a wireless wearable device was implemented in 2018 at a surgical care unit of an academic hospital. This study aimed at gaining insight into nurses' and patients' perspectives regarding the use and innovation of a continuous vital signs monitoring system, three years after its introduction. This qualitative study was performed in a surgical, non-intensive care unit of an academic hospital in 2021. Key-user nurses (nurses with additional training and expertise with the device) and patients were selected for semi-structured interviews, and nurses from the ward were selected for a focus group interview using a topic list. Transcripts of the audio tapes were deductively analysed using four dimensions for adoptions of information and communication technologies (ICT) devices in healthcare. The device provided feelings of safety for nurses and patients. Nurses and patients had a few issues with the device, including the size and the battery life. Nurses gained knowledge and skills in using the system for measurement and interpretations. They perceived the system as a tool to improve the recognition of clinical decline. The use of the system could be further developed regarding the technical device's characteristics, nurses' interpretation of the data and the of type of alarms, the information needs of patients, and clarification of the definition and standardization of continuous monitoring. Three years after the introduction, wireless continuous vital signs monitoring is the new standard of care according to the end-users at the general surgical ward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harm H. J. van Noort
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (F.L.B.-V.); (W.B.-v.O.); (M.P.); (G.H.-d.W.)
| | | | | | | | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (F.L.B.-V.); (W.B.-v.O.); (M.P.); (G.H.-d.W.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Posthuma LM, Breteler MJM, Lirk PB, Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Visscher MJ, Breel JS, Wensing CAGL, Schenk J, Vlaskamp LB, van Rossum MC, Ruurda JP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hollmann MW, Kalkman CJ, Preckel B. Surveillance of high-risk early postsurgical patients for real-time detection of complications using wireless monitoring (SHEPHERD study): results of a randomized multicenter stepped wedge cluster trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1295499. [PMID: 38249988 PMCID: PMC10796990 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1295499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Vital signs measurements on the ward are performed intermittently. This could lead to failure to rapidly detect patients with deteriorating vital signs and worsens long-term outcome. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs on the postsurgical ward improves patient outcome. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized study, patients in the control group received standard monitoring. The intervention group received continuous wireless monitoring of heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature on top of standard care. Automated alerts indicating vital signs deviation from baseline were sent to ward nurses, triggering the calculation of a full early warning score followed. The primary outcome was the occurrence of new disability three months after surgery. Results The study was terminated early (at 57% inclusion) due to COVID-19 restrictions. Therefore, only descriptive statistics are presented. A total of 747 patients were enrolled in this study and eligible for statistical analyses, 517 patients in the control group and 230 patients in the intervention group, the latter only from one hospital. New disability at three months after surgery occurred in 43.7% in the control group and in 39.1% in the intervention group (absolute difference 4.6%). Conclusion This is the largest randomized controlled trial investigating continuous wireless monitoring in postoperative patients. While patients in the intervention group seemed to experience less (new) disability than patients in the control group, results remain inconclusive with regard to postoperative patient outcome due to premature study termination. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02957825.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M. Posthuma
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Philipp B. Lirk
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Els J. Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. Visscher
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer S. Breel
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carin A. G. L. Wensing
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jimmy Schenk
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lyan B. Vlaskamp
- Department of Anesthesiologie, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Gastro-Intestinal and Oncologic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Markus W. Hollmann
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cor J. Kalkman
- Department of Anesthesiologie, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Benedikt Preckel
- Department of Anesthesiologie, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science, Diabetes and Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koivisto JM, Buure T, Engblom J, Rosqvist K, Haavisto E. Association between game metrics in a simulation game and nursing students' surgical nursing knowledge - a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:16. [PMID: 38166830 PMCID: PMC10759537 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01668-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simulation games are effective for acquiring surgical nursing knowledge during education by offering possibilities to learn theoretical knowledge through practical patient scenarios, thus preparing students for demanding surgical nursing care. Game metrics stored in the game system enable assessment of students' behaviour while gameplaying. Combining game metrics with the assessment of a student's surgical nursing knowledge allows versatile information to be obtained about the student's learning outcomes. However, studies on game metrics stored in systems and their relationship with learning outcomes are scarce. METHODS The aim here was to evaluate the association between game metrics in a simulation game and nursing students' surgical nursing knowledge. Nursing students from three universities of applied sciences in Finland participated in a one-week simulation gameplaying intervention that included five surgical nursing scenarios. Students' surgical nursing knowledge was investigated with a quasi-experimental, one-group, pre- and post-test design using a surgical nursing knowledge test. In total, 280 students filled in the knowledge tests. In addition, cross-sectional game data were collected at a single time point between pre- and post-tests. The data were analysed with descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis methods. RESULTS Students' surgical nursing knowledge improved with the intervention. The total number of playthroughs was 3562. The mean maximum score was 126.2 (maximum score range 76-195). The mean playing time of all playthroughs by all players was 4.3 minutes (SD = 81.61). A statistically significant association was found between mean score and knowledge test total score (p < 0.0072), but no significant association emerged between mean playing time and knowledge test total score. CONCLUSION The results indicated that the higher the mean score the better the students' surgical nursing knowledge in the knowledge test. This study did not show that the time spent playing had an impact on students' post-playing knowledge. Our findings support the idea that game metrics can be used in performance evaluation and the results can be used to improve nursing students' readiness for challenging preoperative and postoperative clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaana-Maija Koivisto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, PO BOX 20, Tukholmankatu 8B, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Tuija Buure
- Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Myllypurontie 1, 00920 Helsinki PL 4000, 00079 Metropolia, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Janne Engblom
- Turku School of Economics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland
| | - Kristiina Rosqvist
- Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpönkatu 34, 33520, Tampere, Finland
| | - Elina Haavisto
- Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpönkatu 34, 33520, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Posthuma LM, Preckel B. Initiatives to detect and prevent death from perioperative deterioration. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36:676-682. [PMID: 37767926 PMCID: PMC10621647 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study indicates that there are differences between hospitals in detection, as well as in adequate management of postsurgical complications, a phenomenon that is described as 'failure-to-rescue'.In this review, recent initiatives to reduce failure-to-rescue in the perioperative period are described. RECENT FINDINGS Use of cognitive aids, emergency manuals, family participation as well as remote monitoring systems are measures to reduce failure-to-rescue situations. Postoperative visit of an anaesthesiologist on the ward was not shown to improve outcome, but there is still room for improvement of postoperative care. SUMMARY Improving the complete emergency chain, including monitoring, recognition and response in the afferent limb, as well as diagnostic and treatment in the efferent limb, should lead to reduced failure-to-rescue situations in the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M. Posthuma
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda
| | - Benedikt Preckel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location University of Amsterdam
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Viderman D, Seri E, Aubakirova M, Abdildin Y, Badenes R, Bilotta F. Reply to Farahani, P.; Wahid, L. Comment on "Viderman et al. Remote Monitoring of Chronic Critically Ill Patients after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1010". J Clin Med 2023; 12:6797. [PMID: 37959262 PMCID: PMC10648006 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Thank you very much for taking the time to read this systematic review and for sharing your thoughts [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitriy Viderman
- Department of Surgery, Section of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan;
| | - Elena Seri
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (E.S.); (F.B.)
| | - Mina Aubakirova
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan;
| | - Yerkin Abdildin
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan;
| | - Rafael Badenes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clínic Universitari, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Federico Bilotta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (E.S.); (F.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leenen JPL, Rasing HJM, Kalkman CJ, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Process Evaluation of a Wireless Wearable Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring Intervention in 2 General Hospital Wards: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Nurs 2023; 6:e44061. [PMID: 37140977 DOI: 10.2196/44061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous monitoring of vital signs (CMVS) using wearable wireless sensors is increasingly available to patients in general wards and can improve outcomes and reduce nurse workload. To assess the potential impact of such systems, successful implementation is important. We developed a CMVS intervention and implementation strategy and evaluated its success in 2 general wards. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess and compare intervention fidelity in 2 wards (internal medicine and general surgery) of a large teaching hospital. METHODS A mixed methods sequential explanatory design was used. After thorough training and preparation, CMVS was implemented-in parallel with the standard intermittent manual measurements-and executed for 6 months in each ward. Heart rate and respiratory rate were measured using a chest-worn wearable sensor, and vital sign trends were visualized on a digital platform. Trends were routinely assessed and reported each nursing shift without automated alarms. The primary outcome was intervention fidelity, defined as the proportion of written reports and related nurse activities in case of deviating trends comparing early (months 1-2), mid- (months 3-4), and late (months 5-6) implementation periods. Explanatory interviews with nurses were conducted. RESULTS The implementation strategy was executed as planned. A total of 358 patients were included, resulting in 45,113 monitored hours during 6142 nurse shifts. In total, 10.3% (37/358) of the sensors were replaced prematurely because of technical failure. Mean intervention fidelity was 70.7% (SD 20.4%) and higher in the surgical ward (73.6%, SD 18.1% vs 64.1%, SD 23.7%; P<.001). Fidelity decreased over the implementation period in the internal medicine ward (76%, 57%, and 48% at early, mid-, and late implementation, respectively; P<.001) but not significantly in the surgical ward (76% at early implementation vs 74% at midimplementation [P=.56] vs 70.7% at late implementation [P=.07]). No nursing activities were needed based on vital sign trends for 68.7% (246/358) of the patients. In 174 reports of 31.3% (112/358) of the patients, observed deviating trends led to 101 additional bedside assessments of patients and 73 consultations by physicians. The main themes that emerged during interviews (n=21) included the relative priority of CMVS in nurse work, the importance of nursing assessment, the relatively limited perceived benefits for patient care, and experienced mediocre usability of the technology. CONCLUSIONS We successfully implemented a system for CMVS at scale in 2 hospital wards, but our results show that intervention fidelity decreased over time, more in the internal medicine ward than in the surgical ward. This decrease appeared to depend on multiple ward-specific factors. Nurses' perceptions regarding the value and benefits of the intervention varied. Implications for optimal implementation of CMVS include engaging nurses early, seamless integration into electronic health records, and sophisticated decision support tools for vital sign trend interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jobbe P L Leenen
- Connected Care Center, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
- Isala Academy, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | | | - Cor J Kalkman
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gijsbert A Patijn
- Connected Care Center, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vroman H, Mosch D, Eijkenaar F, Naujokat E, Mohr B, Medic G, Swijnenburg M, Tesselaar E, Franken M. Continuous vital sign monitoring in patients after elective abdominal surgery: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes and costs. J Comp Eff Res 2023; 12:e220176. [PMID: 36645412 PMCID: PMC10288965 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2022-0176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess changes in outcomes and costs upon implementation of continuous vital sign monitoring in postsurgical patients. Materials & methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and in-hospital costs compared with a control period. Results: During the intervention period patients were less frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.004), had shorter length of stay (p < 0.001) and lower costs (p < 0.001). The intervention was associated with a lower odds of ICU admission (odds ratio: 0.422; p = 0.007) and ICU related costs (odds ratio: -662.4; p = 0.083). Conclusion: Continuous vital sign monitoring may have contributed to fewer ICU admissions and lower ICU costs in postsurgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Vroman
- Department of Science, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik Mosch
- Department of Medical Physics, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Eijkenaar
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elke Naujokat
- Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH, Hewlett-Packard-Str. 2,71034 Boeblingen, Germany
| | - Belinda Mohr
- Philips, 222 Jacobs Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA
| | - Goran Medic
- Philips Healthcare, High Tech Campus 52, 5656 AG Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eric Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Physics, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical & Health Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Martijn Franken
- Department of Medical Physics, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zahradka N, Geoghan S, Watson H, Goldberg E, Wolfberg A, Wilkes M. Assessment of Remote Vital Sign Monitoring and Alarms in a Real-World Healthcare at Home Dataset. BIOENGINEERING (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 10:bioengineering10010037. [PMID: 36671610 PMCID: PMC9854741 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The importance of vital sign monitoring to detect deterioration increases during healthcare at home. Continuous monitoring with wearables increases assessment frequency but may create information overload for clinicians. The goal of this work was to demonstrate the impact of vital sign observation frequency and alarm settings on alarms in a real-world dataset. Vital signs were collected from 76 patients admitted to healthcare at home programs using the Current Health (CH) platform; its wearable continuously measured respiratory rate (RR), pulse rate (PR), and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Total alarms, alarm rate, patient rate, and detection time were calculated for three alarm rulesets to detect changes in SpO2, PR, and RR under four vital sign observation frequencies and four window sizes for the alarm algorithms' median filter. Total alarms ranged from 65 to 3113. The alarm rate and early detection increased with the observation frequency for all alarm rulesets. Median filter windows reduced alarms triggered by normal fluctuations in vital signs without compromising the granularity of time between assessments. Frequent assessments enabled with continuous monitoring support early intervention but need to pair with settings that balance sensitivity, specificity, clinical risk, and provider capacity to respond when a patient is home to minimize clinician burden.
Collapse
|
13
|
McGrath SP, Perreard IM, McGovern KM, Blike GT. Understanding the “alarm problem” associated with continuous physiologic monitoring of general care patients. Resusc Plus 2022; 11:100295. [PMID: 36042845 PMCID: PMC9420388 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Aim Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P. McGrath
- Surveillance Analytics Core, Department of Anesthesiology and Analytics Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, United States
- Corresponding author.
| | - Irina M. Perreard
- Surveillance Analytics Core, Department of Anesthesiology and Analytics Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, United States
| | - Krystal M. McGovern
- Surveillance Analytics Core, Value Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, United States
| | - George T. Blike
- Anesthesiology and Community Family Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Verdonk F, Feyaerts D, Badenes R, Bastarache JA, Bouglé A, Ely W, Gaudilliere B, Howard C, Kotfis K, Lautrette A, Le Dorze M, Mankidy BJ, Matthay MA, Morgan CK, Mazeraud A, Patel BV, Pattnaik R, Reuter J, Schultz MJ, Sharshar T, Shrestha GS, Verdonk C, Ware LB, Pirracchio R, Jabaudon M. Upcoming and urgent challenges in critical care research based on COVID-19 pandemic experience. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2022; 41:101121. [PMID: 35781076 PMCID: PMC9245393 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed a heavy burden on healthcare systems worldwide, it also induced urgent mobilisation of research teams to develop treatments preventing or curing the disease and its consequences. It has, therefore, challenged critical care research to rapidly focus on specific fields while forcing critical care physicians to make difficult ethical decisions. This narrative review aims to summarise critical care research -from organisation to research fields- in this pandemic setting and to highlight opportunities to improve research efficiency in the future, based on what is learned from COVID-19. This pressure on research revealed, i.e., i/ the need to harmonise regulatory processes between countries, allowing simplified organisation of international research networks to improve their efficiency in answering large-scale questions; ii/ the importance of developing translational research from which therapeutic innovations can emerge; iii/ the need for improved triage and predictive scores to rationalise admission to the intensive care unit. In this context, key areas for future critical care research and better pandemic preparedness are artificial intelligence applied to healthcare, characterisation of long-term symptoms, and ethical considerations. Such collaborative research efforts should involve groups from both high and low-to-middle income countries to propose worldwide solutions. As a conclusion, stress tests on healthcare organisations should be viewed as opportunities to design new research frameworks and strategies. Worldwide availability of research networks ready to operate is essential to be prepared for next pandemics. Importantly, researchers and physicians should prioritise realistic and ethical goals for both clinical care and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franck Verdonk
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France and GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, California, United States of America
| | - Dorien Feyaerts
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, California, United States of America
| | - Rafael Badenes
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Clìnico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Julie A Bastarache
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Adrien Bouglé
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Wesley Ely
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, at the TN Valley VA Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Brice Gaudilliere
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, California, United States of America
| | - Christopher Howard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Katarzyna Kotfis
- Department Anaesthesiology, Intensive Therapy and Acute Intoxications, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Alexandre Lautrette
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Gabriel-Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Matthieu Le Dorze
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, AP-HP, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Babith Joseph Mankidy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Michael A Matthay
- Departments of Medicine and Anaesthesia, University of California, and Cardiovascular Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Christopher K Morgan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Aurélien Mazeraud
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Université Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Pôle Neuro, Paris, France
| | - Brijesh V Patel
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, and Department of Adult Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation trust, London, UK
| | - Rajyabardhan Pattnaik
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ispat General Hospital, Rourkela, Sundargarh, Odisha, India
| | - Jean Reuter
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Université Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Pôle Neuro, Paris, France
| | - Gentle S Shrestha
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Charles Verdonk
- Unit of Neurophysiology of Stress, Department of Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - Lorraine B Ware
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Romain Pirracchio
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Matthieu Jabaudon
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France; iGReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haahr‐Raunkjaer C, Mølgaard J, Elvekjaer M, Rasmussen SM, Achiam MP, Jorgensen LN, Søgaard MI, Grønbæk KK, Oxbøll A, Sørensen HBD, Meyhoff CS, Aasvang EK. Continuous monitoring of vital sign abnormalities; association to clinical complications in 500 postoperative patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022; 66:552-562. [PMID: 35170026 PMCID: PMC9310747 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing major surgery are at risk of complications, so‐called serious adverse events (SAE). Continuous monitoring may detect deteriorating patients by recording abnormal vital signs. We aimed to assess the association between abnormal vital signs inspired by Early Warning Score thresholds and subsequent SAEs in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods Prospective observational cohort study continuously monitoring heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and blood pressure for up to 96 h in 500 postoperative patients admitted to the general ward. Exposure variables were vital sign abnormalities, primary outcome was any serious adverse event occurring within 30 postoperative days. The primary analysis investigated the association between exposure variables per 24 h and subsequent serious adverse events. Results Serious adverse events occurred in 37% of patients, with 38% occurring during monitoring. Among patients with SAE during monitoring, the median duration of vital sign abnormalities was 272 min (IQR 110–447), compared to 259 min (IQR 153–394) in patients with SAE after monitoring and 261 min (IQR 132–468) in the patients without any SAE (p = .62 for all three group comparisons). Episodes of heart rate ≥110 bpm occurred in 16%, 7.1%, and 3.9% of patients in the time before SAE during monitoring, after monitoring, and without SAE, respectively (p < .002). Patients with SAE after monitoring experienced more episodes of hypotension ≤90 mm Hg/24 h (p = .001). Conclusion Overall duration of vital sign abnormalities at current thresholds were not significantly associated with subsequent serious adverse events, but more patients with tachycardia and hypotension had subsequent serious adverse events. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03491137.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Haahr‐Raunkjaer
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Jesper Mølgaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Mikkel Elvekjaer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Søren M. Rasmussen
- Biomedical Engineering Department of Health Technology Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark
| | - Michael P. Achiam
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Lars N. Jorgensen
- Digestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Mette I.V. Søgaard
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Katja K. Grønbæk
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Anne‐Britt Oxbøll
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Helge B. D. Sørensen
- Biomedical Engineering Department of Health Technology Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark
| | - Christian S. Meyhoff
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Translational Research Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Eske K. Aasvang
- Department of Anaesthesiology Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leenen JPL, Dijkman EM, van Hout A, Kalkman CJ, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Nurses' experiences with continuous vital sign monitoring on the general surgical ward: a qualitative study based on the Behaviour Change Wheel. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:60. [PMID: 35287678 PMCID: PMC8919550 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00837-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To support early recognition of clinical deterioration on a general ward continuous vital signs monitoring (CMVS) systems using wearable devices are increasingly being investigated. Although nurses play a crucial role in successful implementation, reported nurse adoption and acceptance scores vary significantly. In-depth insight into the perspectives of nurses regarding CMVS is lacking. To this end, we applied a theoretical approach for behaviour change derived from the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Aim To provide insight in the capability, opportunity and motivation of nurses working with CMVS, in order to inform future implementation efforts. Methods A qualitative study was conducted, including twelve nurses of a surgical ward in a tertiary teaching hospital with previous experience of working with CMVS. Semi-structured interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis. The results were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behaviour (COM-B) model of the BCW. Results Five key themes emerged. The theme ‘Learning and coaching on the job’ linked to Capability. Nurses favoured learning about CVSM by dealing with it in daily practice. Receiving bedside guidance and coaching was perceived as important. The theme ‘interpretation of vital sign trends’ also linked to Capability. Nurses mentioned the novelty of monitoring vital sign trends of patients on wards. The theme ‘Management of alarms’ linked to Opportunity. Nurses perceived the (false) alarms generated by the system as excessive resulting in feelings of irritation and uncertainty. The theme ‘Integration and compatibility with clinical workflow’ linked to Opportunity. CVSM was experienced as helpful and easy to use, although integration in mobile devices and the EMR was highly favoured and the management of clinical workflows would need improvement. The theme ‘Added value for nursing care’ linked to Motivation. All nurses recognized the potential added value of CVSM for postoperative care. Conclusion Our findings suggest all parts of the COM-B model should be considered when implementing CVSM on general wards. When the themes in Capability and Opportunity are not properly addressed by selecting interventions and policy categories, this may negatively influence the Motivation and may compromise successful implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00837-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P L Leenen
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. .,Connected Care Centre, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - E M Dijkman
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - A van Hout
- Research Group IT Innovations in Health Care, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Campus 2-6, Zwolle, 8017CA, The Netherlands
| | - C J Kalkman
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L Schoonhoven
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, University Rd, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.,Connected Care Centre, Isala, Dr. van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eddahchouri Y, Peelen RV, Koeneman M, Touw HR, van Goor H, Bredie SJ. Effect of continuous wireless vital sign monitoring on unplanned ICU admissions and rapid response team calls: a before-and-after study. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:857-863. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
18
|
Santos M, Vollam S, Pimentel MA, Areia C, Young L, Roman C, Ede J, Piper P, King E, Harford M, Shah A, Gustafson O, Tarassenko L, Watkinson P. The Use of Wearable Pulse Oximeters in the Prompt Detection of Hypoxemia and During Movement: Diagnostic Accuracy Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e28890. [PMID: 35166690 PMCID: PMC8889481 DOI: 10.2196/28890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Commercially available wearable (ambulatory) pulse oximeters have been recommended as a method for managing patients at risk of physiological deterioration, such as active patients with COVID-19 disease receiving care in hospital isolation rooms; however, their reliability in usual hospital settings is not known. Objective We report the performance of wearable pulse oximeters in a simulated clinical setting when challenged by motion and low levels of arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO2). Methods The performance of 1 wrist-worn (Wavelet) and 3 finger-worn (CheckMe O2+, AP-20, and WristOx2 3150) wearable, wireless transmission–mode pulse oximeters was evaluated. For this, 7 motion tasks were performed: at rest, sit-to-stand, tapping, rubbing, drinking, turning pages, and using a tablet. Hypoxia exposure followed, in which inspired gases were adjusted to achieve decreasing SaO2 levels at 100%, 95%, 90%, 87%, 85%, 83%, and 80%. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) estimates were compared with simultaneous SaO2 samples to calculate the root-mean-square error (RMSE). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the detection of hypoxemia (ie, SaO2<90%). Results SpO2 estimates matching 215 SaO2 samples in both study phases, from 33 participants, were analyzed. Tapping, rubbing, turning pages, and using a tablet degraded SpO2 estimation (RMSE>4% for at least 1 device). All finger-worn pulse oximeters detected hypoxemia, with an overall sensitivity of ≥0.87 and specificity of ≥0.80, comparable to that of the Philips MX450 pulse oximeter. Conclusions The SpO2 accuracy of wearable finger-worn pulse oximeters was within that required by the International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Performance was degraded by motion, but all pulse oximeters could detect hypoxemia. Our findings support the use of wearable, wireless transmission–mode pulse oximeters to detect the onset of clinical deterioration in hospital settings. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry 61535692; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61535692 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034404
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Santos
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Vollam
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Af Pimentel
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carlos Areia
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Young
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Cristian Roman
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jody Ede
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Philippa Piper
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth King
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Therapies Clinical Service, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mirae Harford
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Akshay Shah
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Gustafson
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lionel Tarassenko
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Watkinson
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Adult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Remote Monitoring of Chronic Critically Ill Patients after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11041010. [PMID: 35207287 PMCID: PMC8879658 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11041010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Over the past few decades, critical care has seen many advancements. These advancements resulted in a considerable increase in the prevalence of chronically critically ill patients requiring prolonged medical care, which led to a massive increase in healthcare utilization. Methods: We performed a search for suitable articles using PubMed and Google Scholar from the inception of these databases to 15 May 2021. Results: Thirty-four articles were included in the review and analyzed. We described the following characteristics and problems with chronic critically ill patient management: the patient population, remote monitoring, the monitoring of physiological parameters in chronic critically ill patients, the anatomical location of sensors, the barriers to implementation, and the main technology-related issues. The main challenges in the management of these patients are (1) the shortage of caretakers, (2) the periodicity of vital function monitoring (e.g., episodic measuring of blood pressure leads to missing important critical events such as hypertension, hypotension, and hypoxia), and (3) failure to catch and manage critical physiological events at the right time, which can result in poor outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of critically ill patients is expected to grow. Technical solutions can greatly assist medical personnel and caregivers. Wearable devices can be used to monitor blood pressure, heart rate, pulse, respiratory rate, blood oxygen saturation, metabolism, and central nervous system function. The most important points that should be addressed in future studies are the performance of the remote monitoring systems, safety, clinical and economic outcomes, as well as the acceptance of the devices by patients, caretakers, and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
|
20
|
McGillion MH, Allan K, Ross-Howe S, Jiang W, Graham M, Marcucci M, Johnson A, Scott T, Ouellette C, Kocetkov D, Lounsbury J, Bird M, Harsha P, Sanchez K, Harvey V, Vincent J, Borges FK, Carroll SL, Peter E, Patel A, Bergh S, Devereaux PJ. Beyond wellness monitoring: Continuous multiparameter remote automated monitoring of patients. Can J Cardiol 2021; 38:267-278. [PMID: 34742860 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The pursuit of more efficient patient-friendly health systems and reductions in tertiary health services use has seen enormous growth in the application and study of remote patient monitoring systems for cardiovascular patient care. While there are many consumer-grade products available to monitor patient wellness, the regulation of these technologies varies considerably, with most products having little to no evaluation data. As the science and practice of virtual care continues to evolve, clinicians and researchers can benefit from an understanding of more comprehensive solutions, capable of monitoring three or more biophysical parameters (e.g., oxygen saturation, heart rate) continuously and simultaneously. These devices, herein referred to as continuous multiparameter remote automated monitoring (CM-RAM) devices, have the potential to revolutionize virtual patient care. Through seamless integration of multiple biophysical signals, CM-RAM technologies can allow for the acquisition of high-volume big data for the development of algorithms to facilitate early detection of negative changes in patient health status and timely clinician response. In this article, we review key principles, architecture, and components of CM-RAM technologies. Work to date in this field and related implications are also presented, including strategic priorities for advancing the science and practice of CM-RAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H McGillion
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Katherine Allan
- Division of Cardiology, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Ross-Howe
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Cloud DX, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wenjun Jiang
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Maura Marcucci
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ana Johnson
- Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ted Scott
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carley Ouellette
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer Lounsbury
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marissa Bird
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Karla Sanchez
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Harvey
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Vincent
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Flavia K Borges
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra L Carroll
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Peter
- University of Toronto Faculty of Nursing, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ameen Patel
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sverre Bergh
- Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Diseases, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway
| | - P J Devereaux
- McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Areia C, Biggs C, Santos M, Thurley N, Gerry S, Tarassenko L, Watkinson P, Vollam S. The impact of wearable continuous vital sign monitoring on deterioration detection and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2021; 25:351. [PMID: 34583742 PMCID: PMC8477465 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03766-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely recognition of the deteriorating inpatient remains challenging. Wearable monitoring systems (WMS) may augment current monitoring practices. However, there are many barriers to implementation in the hospital environment, and evidence describing the clinical impact of WMS on deterioration detection and patient outcome remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of vital-sign monitoring on detection of deterioration and related clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients using WMS, in comparison with standard care. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in August 2020 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, Health Technology Assessment databases and grey literature. Studies comparing the use of WMS against standard care for deterioration detection and related clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients were included. Deterioration related outcomes (primary) included unplanned intensive care admissions, rapid response team or cardiac arrest activation, total and major complications rate. Other clinical outcomes (secondary) included in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay. Exploratory outcomes included alerting system parameters and clinical trial registry information. RESULTS Of 8706 citations, 10 studies with different designs met the inclusion criteria, of which 7 were included in the meta-analyses. Overall study quality was moderate. The meta-analysis indicated that the WMS, when compared with standard care, was not associated with significant reductions in intensive care transfers (risk ratio, RR 0.87; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.66-1.15), rapid response or cardiac arrest team activation (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.69-1.01), total (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.44-1.32) and major (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.24-1.30) complications prevalence. There was also no statistically significant association with reduced mortality (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18-1.29) and hospital length of stay (mean difference, MD - 0.09; 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.44). CONCLUSION This systematic review indicates that there is no current evidence that implementation of WMS impacts early deterioration detection and associated clinical outcomes, as differing design/quality of available studies and diversity of outcome measures make it difficult to reach a definite conclusion. Our narrative findings suggested that alarms should be adjusted to minimise false alarms and promote rapid clinical action in response to deterioration. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42020188633 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Areia
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK.
| | - Christopher Biggs
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK
| | - Mauro Santos
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Neal Thurley
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Stephen Gerry
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lionel Tarassenko
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Peter Watkinson
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK
- Kadoorie Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Vollam
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Morgado Areia C, Santos M, Vollam S, Pimentel M, Young L, Roman C, Ede J, Piper P, King E, Gustafson O, Harford M, Shah A, Tarassenko L, Watkinson P. A Chest Patch for Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring: Clinical Validation Study During Movement and Controlled Hypoxia. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27547. [PMID: 34524087 PMCID: PMC8482195 DOI: 10.2196/27547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care in general wards includes periodic manual measurements, with the data entered into track-and-trigger charts, either on paper or electronically. Wearable devices may support health care staff, improve patient safety, and promote early deterioration detection in the interval between periodic measurements. However, regulatory standards for ambulatory cardiac monitors estimating heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) do not specify performance criteria during patient movement or clinical conditions in which the patient's oxygen saturation varies. Therefore, further validation is required before clinical implementation and deployment of any wearable system that provides continuous vital sign measurements. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to determine the agreement between a chest-worn patch (VitalPatch) and a gold standard reference device for HR and RR measurements during movement and gradual desaturation (modeling a hypoxic episode) in a controlled environment. METHODS After the VitalPatch and gold standard devices (Philips MX450) were applied, participants performed different movements in seven consecutive stages: at rest, sit-to-stand, tapping, rubbing, drinking, turning pages, and using a tablet. Hypoxia was then induced, and the participants' oxygen saturation gradually reduced to 80% in a controlled environment. The primary outcome measure was accuracy, defined as the mean absolute error (MAE) of the VitalPatch estimates when compared with HR and RR gold standards (3-lead electrocardiography and capnography, respectively). We defined these as clinically acceptable if the rates were within 5 beats per minute for HR and 3 respirations per minute (rpm) for RR. RESULTS Complete data sets were acquired for 29 participants. In the movement phase, the HR estimates were within prespecified limits for all movements. For RR, estimates were also within the acceptable range, with the exception of the sit-to-stand and turning page movements, showing an MAE of 3.05 (95% CI 2.48-3.58) rpm and 3.45 (95% CI 2.71-4.11) rpm, respectively. For the hypoxia phase, both HR and RR estimates were within limits, with an overall MAE of 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.78) beats per minute and 1.89 (95% CI 1.75-2.03) rpm, respectively. There were no significant differences in the accuracy of HR and RR estimations between normoxia (≥90%), mild (89.9%-85%), and severe hypoxia (<85%). CONCLUSIONS The VitalPatch was highly accurate throughout both the movement and hypoxia phases of the study, except for RR estimation during the two types of movements. This study demonstrated that VitalPatch can be safely tested in clinical environments to support earlier detection of cardiorespiratory deterioration. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61535692; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61535692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Morgado Areia
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mauro Santos
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Vollam
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Pimentel
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Young
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Cristian Roman
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jody Ede
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Philippa Piper
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth King
- Therapies Clinical Service Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Gustafson
- Therapies Clinical Service Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mirae Harford
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Akshay Shah
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lionel Tarassenko
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Watkinson
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stellpflug C, Pierson L, Roloff D, Mosman E, Gross T, Marsh S, Willis V, Gabrielson D. Continuous Physiological Monitoring Improves Patient Outcomes. Am J Nurs 2021; 121:40-46. [PMID: 33755624 DOI: 10.1097/01.naj.0000742504.44428.c9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND General patient acuity is increasing in the United States, with more patients having multiple comorbidities and acute-on-chronic conditions. Hospitalizations may also be complicated by serious adverse events, often unrelated to the admitting medical diagnosis. In our facility, the late detection of patient deterioration on general medical units often resulted in increased length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and poor patient outcomes. PURPOSE The purpose of this project was to improve patient surveillance and better identify early signs of patient deterioration through the use of continuous vital sign monitoring technology. METHODS To improve detection of patient deterioration, a nurse-led monitoring and response system was developed using a wearable, wireless device for continuous vital sign surveillance. The patient data the device provided was used with early warning scores and sepsis screening protocols for timely goal-directed interventions. RESULTS Ninety-seven percent of patient deterioration events were recognized and treated as a result of this continuous monitoring and response system. Rapid response team activations decreased by 53% between baseline and the intervention period. LOS among patients transferred to the ICU decreased from 2.82 to 2.19 days. Nurse satisfaction with use of the continuous monitoring device was positive, with 74% of nurses surveyed reporting that information provided by the device enhanced decision-making. CONCLUSIONS New technology for patient surveillance, in this case a nurse-led monitoring and response system, can be successfully integrated into general care practice. Use of the nurse-led response system helped nurses recognize early signs of deterioration and continue meaningful patient interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Stellpflug
- Courtney Stellpflug is a clinical nurse specialist, Laura Pierson is a hospital staff nurse, Devin Roloff is a health systems engineer, Elton Mosman is an operations administrator, Tera Gross is a nurse administrator, Scott Marsh is a unit nurse manager, Valerie Willis is a nurse education specialist, and Donald Gabrielson is a health care technology management asset administrator, all at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Contact author: Courtney Stellpflug, . The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Calls for Predictive Analytics Monitoring-A New Kind of Illness Scoring System. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2:e0294. [PMID: 33364604 PMCID: PMC7752690 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 can lead to sudden and severe respiratory failure that mandates endotracheal intubation, a procedure much more safely performed under elective rather than emergency conditions. Early warning of rising risk of this event could benefit both patients and healthcare providers by reducing the high risk of emergency intubation. Current illness severity scoring systems, which usually update only when clinicians measure vital signs or laboratory values, are poorly suited for early detection of this kind of rapid clinical deterioration. We propose that continuous predictive analytics monitoring, a new approach to bedside management, is more useful. The principles of this new practice anchor in analysis of continuous bedside monitoring data, training models on diagnosis-specific paths of deterioration using clinician-identified events, and continuous display of trends in risks rather than alerts when arbitrary thresholds are exceeded.
Collapse
|
25
|
Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18636. [PMID: 32469323 PMCID: PMC7351263 DOI: 10.2196/18636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous monitoring of vital signs by using wearable wireless devices may allow for timely detection of clinical deterioration in patients in general wards in comparison to detection by standard intermittent vital signs measurements. A large number of studies on many different wearable devices have been reported in recent years, but a systematic review is not yet available to date. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review for health care professionals regarding the current evidence about the validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs of wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs. METHODS A systematic and comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2009 to September 2019 for studies that evaluated wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs in adults. Outcomes were structured by validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs. Risk of bias was determined by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2nd edition, or quality of health economic studies tool. RESULTS In this review, 27 studies evaluating 13 different wearable wireless devices were included. These studies predominantly evaluated the validation or the feasibility outcomes of these devices. Only a few studies reported the clinical outcomes with these devices and they did not report a significantly better clinical outcome than the standard tools used for measuring vital signs. Cost outcomes were not reported in any study. The quality of the included studies was predominantly rated as low or moderate. CONCLUSIONS Wearable wireless continuous monitoring devices are mostly still in the clinical validation and feasibility testing phases. To date, there are no high quality large well-controlled studies of wearable wireless devices available that show a significant clinical benefit or cost-effectiveness. Such studies are needed to help health care professionals and administrators in their decision making regarding implementation of these devices on a large scale in clinical practice or in-home monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sun L, Joshi M, Khan SN, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med 2020; 113:217-224. [PMID: 32521195 PMCID: PMC7439595 DOI: 10.1177/0141076820925436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Delayed response to clinical deterioration as a result of intermittent vital sign monitoring is a cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring of vital signs (CoNiM) in non-intensive care unit patients. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies. Embase, MEDLINE, HMIC, PsycINFO and Cochrane were searched from April 1964 to 18 June 2019 with no language restriction. SETTING The search was limited to hospitalised, non-intensive care unit adult patients who had two or more vital signs continuously monitored. PARTICIPANTS All primary studies that evaluated the clinical impact of using multi-parameter CoNiM in adult hospital wards outside of the intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical impact of multi-parameter CoNiM. RESULTS This systematic review identified 14 relevant studies from 3846 search results. Five studies were classified as Group A - associations found between measured vital signs and clinical parameters. Nine studies were classified as Group B - comparison between clinical outcomes of patients with and without multi-parameter CoNiM. Vital signs data from CoNiM were found to associate with type of presenting complaint, level of renal function and incidence of major clinical events. CoNiM also assisted in diagnosis by differentiating between patients with acute heart failure, stroke and sepsis (with sub-clustering of septic patients). In the meta-analysis, patients on multi-parameter CoNiM had a 39% decrease in risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.39-0.95) when compared to patients with regular intermittent monitoring. There was a trend of reduced intensive care unit transfer (RR 0.86; 95% CI -0.67-1.11) and reduced rapid response team activation (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.26-1.43). A trend towards reduced hospital length of stay was also found using weighted mean difference (WMD -3.32 days; 95% CI -8.82-2.19 days). CONCLUSION There is evidence of clinical benefit in implementing CoNiM in non-intensive care unit patients. This review supports the use of multi-parameter CoNiM outside of intensive care unit with further large-scale RCTs required to further affirm clinical impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Sun
- Department of Surgery and Cancer,
Imperial
College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Meera Joshi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer,
Imperial
College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Sadia N Khan
- West Middlesex University Hospital,
Isleworth TW7 6AF, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer,
Imperial
College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer,
Imperial
College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|