HPNA 2019-2022 Research Agenda: Development and Rationale

Improving Benefit and Reducing Burden of Informal Caregiving for Patients With Heart Failure: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Few randomized clinical trials test the effect of interventions on heart failure caregiver well-being.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a patient-focused symptom and psychosocial collaborative care intervention (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) on heart failure caregiver depression, burden, and benefit-finding.

METHODS

A sequential explanatory mixed-method design was used in the context of a multisite, randomized clinical trial. Self-reported caregiver depression, burden, and benefit-finding were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Thematic analysis was conducted on social worker documentation of a psychosocial intervention with caregivers.

RESULTS

One hundred one caregivers were randomized to usual care or Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness. There were no significant differences in caregiver depression, burden, or benefit-finding between usual care and Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness. Caregiver outcomes were discussed in 42% of intervention notes, highlighting varied and complex caregiver experiences. Inductive analysis reaffirmed the complexity and range of caregiver needs and experiences.

CONCLUSION

A patient symptom/psychosocial intervention did not impact caregiver well-being. Interventions should target specific needs of caregivers.

American Association of Nurse Practitioners Research Agenda, 2023-2028

ABSTRACT

This report highlights the 2023-2028 American Association of Nurse Practitioners Research Agenda (AANP-RA), which focuses on the research goals of AANP as an organization and is based on its mission and strategic plan. The purpose of the AANP Research Agenda is to outline research priorities that advance the AANP Strategic Plan and concurrently address gaps in nursing science. American Association of Nurse Practitioners supports research studies that are rigorously designed and conducted using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches, as well as implementation science with the potential to positively impact both NP practice and patient health outcomes. The AANP-RA strategy is guided by the PEARL acronym: examining NP Practice, Education, policy Advocacy, Research, and Leadership. A discussion of each area is presented along with suggested topics.

PhD-Prepared Nurses' Areas of Inquiry

BACKGROUND

Nursing science is heavily dependent on nurse scientists with adequate funding. Nurse scientists should be aware of organizations' research agendas and, to the extent possible, align research with stated research priorities. Current information on the demographics of nurse scientists, their projects, and the alignment to known priorities is illusive.

PURPOSE

To describe areas of inquiry pursued by PhD-prepared nurses and congruence with the research agendas of nursing organizations.

METHODS

A descriptive, exploratory approach was undertaken with PhD-prepared nurse scientists to gather data about their PhD program, dissertation topic, current work status, productivity, and future recommendations.

RESULTS

Key findings were that dissertation topics were broad and aligned with research priorities. Elements influencing research productivity are described.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding current nursing science stewardship and intentionally strategizing for the future of research, academia, and clinical practice will enhance our ability to tailor PhD programs accordingly.

Priority Research Topics and Patient and Family Needs in a National Sample of Hospice Agencies

CONTEXT

Various contextual factors surrounding hospice care have reinforced the need for scholars to pursue practice-relevant research questions. Although priority-setting is a primary approach to streamline such efforts, research appears yet to have conducted priority-setting with hospice professionals.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the areas of needed research and clinical focus voiced by a national probability sample of US hospice agency representatives.

METHODS

A national probability sample of 600 hospice agencies proportionately stratified by state and profit status was surveyed. At the end of the survey, participants indicated whether or not they were willing to answer two additional open-ended questions. These two questions requested participants' input on areas of needed attention related to (1) research topics and (2) unmet needs for patients and families. Responses were content analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 317 surveys were completed (response rate = 61.8%). Viable responses were recorded by 129 participants responding to at least one item. Content analysis generated the following five categories (and various subcategories): earlier access to hospice, education (outside physicians, patients and families, public), policy barriers to hospice enrollment (hospice eligibility and reimbursement, gaps in insurance coverage), effects of policy restrictions on hospice care (reimbursement for care, pain management, clinician issues), and improving the provision of in-home hospice care (community resources, supports for caregivers, supports for when caregiver assistance is inadequate, needs already are being met).

CONCLUSION

These findings presented by hospice agency representatives reflect directions for research and clinical development. Efforts are needed to cohere professional- and patient-reported areas of needed attention.

Dementia caregiver burdens predict overnight hospitalization and hospice utilization

OBJECTIVES

To determine sociodemographics and caregiver burdens associated with overnight hospitalization, hospice utilization, and hospitalization frequency among persons with dementia (PWD).

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of PWD (n = 899) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study linked to the National Study of Caregiving. Logistic and proportional odds regression determined the effects of caregiver burdens on overnight hospitalization, hospice use, and hospitalization frequency. Differences between PWD alive not-alive groups were compared on overnight hospitalization and frequency.

RESULTS

Alive PWD (n = 804) were 2.36 times more likely to have an overnight hospital stay (p = 0.004) and 1.96 times more likely to have multiple hospitalizations when caregivers found it physically difficult to provide care (p = 0.011). Decedents aged 65-74 (n = 95) were 4.55 times more likely to experience overnight hospitalizations than 85+, hospitalizations were more frequent (odds ratio [OR] = 4.84), and there was a significant difference between PWD alive/not alive groups (p = 0.035). Decedents were 5.60 times more likely to experience an overnight hospitalization when their caregivers had financial difficulty, hospitalizations were more frequent when caregivers had too much to handle (OR = 8.44) and/or no time for themselves (OR = 10.67). When caregivers had no time for themselves, a significant difference between alive/not alive groups (p = 0.018) was detected in hospitalization frequency. PWD whose caregivers had emotional difficulty helping were 5.89 times more likely to utilize hospice than caregivers who did not report emotional difficulty.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Care transitions among PWD at the end of life are impacted by the circumstances and experiences of their caregivers. Subjective caregiver burdens represent potentially modifiable risks for undesired care transitions and opportunities for promoting hospice use. Future work is warranted to identify and address these issues as they occur.

The Project ENABLE Cornerstone randomized controlled trial: study protocol for a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for African American and rural-dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers

Background

Family caregivers play a vital, yet stressful role in managing the healthcare needs and optimizing the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, from the time they are newly diagnosed until end of life. While early telehealth palliative care has been found to effectively support family caregivers, little work has focused on historically under-resourced populations, particularly African American and rural-dwelling individuals. To address this need, we developed and are currently testing Project ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) Cornerstone, a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for family caregivers of African American and rural-dwelling patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer.

Methods

This is a 2-site, single-blind, hybrid type I implementation-effectiveness trial of the Cornerstone intervention versus usual care. Cornerstone is a multicomponent intervention based on Pearlin’s Stress-Health Process Model where African American and/or rural-dwelling family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer (target sample size = 294 dyads) are paired with a lay navigator coach and receive a series of six, brief 20–60-min telehealth sessions focused on stress management and coping, caregiving skills, getting help, self-care, and preparing for the future/advance care planning. Subsequent to core sessions, caregivers receive monthly follow-up indefinitely until the patient’s death. Caregiver and patient outcomes are collected at baseline and every 12 weeks until the patient’s death (primary outcome: caregiver distress at 24 weeks; secondary outcomes: caregiver: quality of life and burden; patient: distress, quality of life, and healthcare utilization). Implementation costs and the intervention cost effectiveness are also being evaluated.

Discussion

Should this intervention demonstrate efficacy, it would yield an implementation-ready model of early palliative care support for under-resourced family caregivers. A key design principle that has centrally informed the Cornerstone intervention is that every caregiving situation is unique and each caregiver faces distinct challenges that cannot be addressed using a one-size-fits all approach. Hence, Cornerstone employs culturally savvy lay navigator coaches who are trained to establish a strong, therapeutic alliance with participants and tailor their coaching to a diverse range of individual circumstances.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04318886. Registered on 20 March, 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06305-w.

Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy for the Development of Optimized Interventions in Palliative Care

Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported positive benefit of multicomponent "bundled" palliative care interventions for patients and family caregivers while highlighting limitations in determining key elements and mechanisms of improvement. Traditional research approaches, such as the randomized controlled trial (RCT), typically treat interventions as "bundled" treatment packages, making it difficult to assess definitively which aspects of an intervention can be reduced or replaced or whether there are synergistic or antagonistic interactions between intervention components. Progressing toward palliative care interventions that are effective, efficient, and scalable will require new strategies and novel approaches. One such approach is the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), a framework informed by engineering principles, that uses a systematic process to empirically identify an intervention comprised of components that positively contribute to desired outcomes under real-life constraints. This article provides a brief overview and application of MOST and factorial trial design in palliative care research, including our insights from conducting a pilot factorial trial of an early palliative care intervention to enhance the decision support skills of advanced cancer family caregivers (Project CASCADE).

Communication and Cultural Sensitivity for Families and Children With Life-Limiting Diseases: An Informed Decision-Making Ethical Case in Community-Based Palliative Care

The health care decisions of families of children who have life-limiting genetic diseases are impacted by multiple factors including religious and ethical values, education and knowledge, emotional trauma, availability of support, and accessibility of care. Palliative care nurses must practice the highest standards by delivering nonbiased, nonjudgmental support to patients and families; however, nurses may experience moral distress if their personal values conflict with a family's decisions and needs. This case focuses on a family receiving community-based palliative care for a child with a genetic life-limiting disease. They had a family history of this disease, which had caused the deaths of previous children, and the mother had a current unplanned pregnancy. The care team overcame language barriers and cultural obstacles to establish a trusting relationship with the vulnerable pregnant mother. They were able to support her decision to terminate her pregnancy safely by helping her to navigate a complex health care system. Using 5 crucial pillars to assist health care members with the delivery of nonjudgmental family-centered palliative care is recommended: (1) identification of biases, (2) utilization of a culturally safe approach, (3) effective communication, (4) assessment and support, and (5) knowledge of community resources.

Systematic Review of Telehospice Telemedicine and e-Health

Background: A 2012 systematic review by Oliver et al. of evidence-based research on telehospice included 26 research articles published between 2000 and 2010 on the use of telehospice connecting hospice professionals with caregivers and their care recipients. The present study replicated research by Oliver et al., extending the time frame from 2010 through 2020. The aim of this study was to answer the question-what is the current state of the evidence related to telehospice services? Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted for the time period 2010 to 2020 of the existing literature researching the topic of telehospice. Thirteen articles (five quantitative, six qualitative, and two mixed methods) were found that meet the inclusion criteria of the study. The Methodological Rigor Scoring Instrument was used to code the qualitative and quantitative articles separately to address methodological differences. Results: The most common findings were related to technology adaptation readiness for staff and caregivers. Studies assessed the use of telehospice that included incorporated technology, such as an electronic tablet, to provide synchronous communication between the provider and the patient/caregiver. Provider and caregiver attitudes regarding telehospice care were largely positive with studies reporting acceptance of telehospice as generally high. Conclusions: The past 10 years have yielded a small but significant body of research on telehospice. Published research on the topic reports a generally high level of patient and caregiver satisfaction about the experience, but limited findings have been published relating to patient outcomes. As adaptation of telehospice and technology has surged in the past year, it is expected that additional research on the impact of technology on clinical outcomes will emerge in the future.

Investigation of Modifiable Variables to Increase Hospice Nurse Comfort With Care Provision to Children and Families in the Community: A Population-Level Study Across Tennessee, Mississippi, and Arkansas

CONTEXT

Most hospice nurses across Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi report significant discomfort with provision of pediatric palliative and hospice care (PPHC). How best to target and modify variables to increase nurse comfort levels is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether modifiable variables are associated with increased hospice nurse comfort with PPHC provision in the community.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was developed, pilot tested, and distributed to hospice nurses across a tristate region to assess nurse training experiences and comfort with PPHC provision. Targeted subanalyses were conducted to investigate associations between nurse comfort level and clinical, training, and patient frequency variables.

RESULTS

A total of 551 respondents representing 71 hospices across Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi completed surveys. Hospice nurse comfort with provision of care to children was statistically significantly associated with exposure to prior PPHC clinical experiences (P < 0.001), receipt of formal pediatric PPHC training (P < 0.001), and higher hospice-level (P = 0.01) and individual-level frequency of PPHC provision (P < 0.001). PPHC clinical experience was the most impactful variable with respect to comfort with overall and end-of-life PPHC provision; formal training was the most impactful variable with respect to comfort with management of severe symptoms at the end of life.

CONCLUSION

Modifiable variables exist that are readily targetable to improve hospice nurse comfort with PPHC provision. These findings should inform the development and investigation of clinical and educational interventions to empower both nurses and hospices to optimize the provision of quality care to children with serious illness and their families in the community.

Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care: A Scoping Review and Directions for Future Nursing Research

In 2010, forgoing curative therapies were removed as a hospice eligibility criterion for children through section 2302 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act called Concurrent Care for Children. Given that concurrent care is a federally mandated option for children and their families, no review of the science has been conducted. The purpose of this study was to systematically collect the evidence on concurrent hospice care, critically appraise the evidence, and identify areas for future nursing research. Of the 186 articles identified for review, 14 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies in this review described concurrent hospice care from a variety of perspectives: policy, legal, and ethics. However, only 1 article evaluated the impact of concurrent hospice care on outcomes, whereas several studies explained clinical and state-level implementation. There is a need for further studies that move beyond conceptualization and generate baseline and outcomes data. Understanding the effectiveness of concurrent hospice care might provide important information for future nursing research. The approaches used to disseminate and implement concurrent hospice care at state, provider, and family levels should be explored.

The future of pediatric nursing science

The provision of safe and effective nursing care to children is dependent upon pediatric nurse scientists creating knowledge that guides and directs day-to-day nursing practice. Current trends demonstrating steady decreases of pediatric nurses and inadequate numbers of PhD-prepared pediatric nurse scientists put the health of our children at risk. The purposes of this paper are to (1) summarize current health care demands in pediatrics, (2) present our concern that the number of pediatric nurse scientists is inadequate to generate foundational knowledge to guide pediatric nursing practice, (3) present our perspectives on factors influencing the number of pediatric nurse scientists, and (4) recommend specific actions for nursing leaders, nursing faculty, and professional nursing organizations to increase the depth and breadth of pediatric nursing science to meet current and future pediatric care needs.