Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma Frequently Exhibits Lynch Syndrome–associated Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency But Does Not Harbor Sporadic MLH1 Deficiency

Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2021

Duodenal cancer is considered to be a small intestinal carcinoma in terms of clinicopathology. In Japan, there are no established treatment guidelines based on sufficient scientific evidence; therefore, in daily clinical practice, treatment is based on the experience of individual physicians. However, with advances in diagnostic modalities, it is anticipated that opportunities for its detection will increase in future. We developed guidelines for duodenal cancer because this disease is considered to have a high medical need from both healthcare providers and patients for appropriate management. These guidelines were developed for use in actual clinical practice for patients suspected of having non-ampullary duodenal epithelial malignancy and for patients diagnosed with non-ampullary duodenal epithelial malignancy. In this study, a practice algorithm was developed in accordance with the Minds Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017, and Clinical Questions were set for each area of epidemiology and diagnosis, endoscopic treatment, surgical treatment, and chemotherapy. A draft recommendation was developed through a literature search and systematic review, followed by a vote on the recommendations. We made decisions based on actual clinical practice such that the level of evidence would not be the sole determinant of the recommendation. This guideline is the most standard guideline as of the time of preparation. It is important to decide how to handle each case in consultation with patients and their family, the treating physician, and other medical personnel, considering the actual situation at the facility (and the characteristics of the patient).

Immunohistochemistry as predictive and prognostic markers for gastrointestinal malignancies

Biomarkers play a key role in the comprehensive pathologic evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies. These biomarkers can be predictive, indicating whether a tumor is likely to respond to a particular therapy, or prognostic, providing information about the likely course and outcome of a disease. This review article will discuss available immunohistochemical stains for assessing these markers, including staining rationale, scoring criteria, associated systemic therapies, and pictorial examples. PD-L1, HER2, and mismatch repair status can be evaluated via immunohistochemistry for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal carcinomas. Biomarkers currently play a more limited role in evaluation of pancreatic and small bowel malignancies. Immunohistochemistry can also be used to evaluate biomarker status in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, gastrointestinal malignancies with NTRK gene fusions, and undifferentiated carcinomas with switch-sucrose non-fermentable complex abnormalities.

How Should We Test for Lynch Syndrome? A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Strategies

International guidelines for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) recommend molecular screening of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to identify patients for germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene testing. As our understanding of the LS phenotype and diagnostic technologies have advanced, there is a need to review these guidelines and new screening opportunities. We discuss the barriers to implementation of current guidelines, as well as guideline limitations, and highlight new technologies and knowledge that may address these. We also discuss alternative screening strategies to increase the rate of LS diagnoses. In particular, the focus of current guidance on CRCs means that approximately half of Lynch-spectrum tumours occurring in unknown male LS carriers, and only one-third in female LS carriers, will trigger testing for LS. There is increasing pressure to expand guidelines to include molecular screening of endometrial cancers, the most frequent cancer in female LS carriers. Furthermore, we collate the evidence to support MMR deficiency testing of other Lynch-spectrum tumours to screen for LS. However, a reliance on tumour tissue limits preoperative testing and, therefore, diagnosis prior to malignancy. The recent successes of functional assays to detect microsatellite instability or MMR deficiency in non-neoplastic tissues suggest that future diagnostic pipelines could become independent of tumour tissue.

Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Defective DNA Mismatch Repair in Small-bowel Carcinoma in a Japanese Hospital-based Population

Objectives

To investigate the prevalence and molecular characteristics of defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) in small-bowel carcinoma (SBC) in a Japanese-hospital population.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the expression of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections prepared from surgically resected primary SBCs from 30 patients during March 2002 to March 2017. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome was performed in patients who demonstrated MMR protein loss.

Results

Two of 30 patients (6.7%) demonstrated concomitant loss of MSH2/MSH6 protein expression. Further genetic testing identified a pathogenic MSH2 variant in one of these patients.

Conclusions

The prevalence of dMMR SBCs in a Japanese hospital-based population seems lower than that reported in previous studies. To determine whether dMMR SBCs might be strongly linked to Lynch syndrome, there is a need for further investigation with a larger sample size.

Frequency and clinicopathologic associations of DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency in ampullary carcinoma: Routine testing is indicated

BACKGROUND

The significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in ampullary cancers (ACs) has not been established.

METHODS

In total, 127 ACs with invasive carcinomas measuring ≥3 mmthat had adequate tissue were analyzed immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

MMR loss was detected in 18% of ACs (higher than in colorectal cancers). Twelve tumors with MLH1-PMS2 loss were negative for BRAF V600E mutation, suggesting a Lynch syndrome association. MMR-deficient tumors (n = 23), comparedwith MMR-intact tumors (n = 104), showed a striking male predominance (male:female ratio, 4.7). Although the deficient tumors had slightly larger invasion size (2.7 vs 2.1 cm), they also had more expansile growth and less invasiveness, including less perineural invasion, and they ultimately had lower tumor (T) classification and less lymph node metastasis (30% vs 53%; P = .04). More important, patients who had MMR-deficient tumors had better clinical outcomes, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 68% versus 45% (P = .03), which was even more pronounced in those who had higher Tclassification (5-year overall survival, 69% vs 34%; P = .04). MMR deficiencyhad a statistically significant association with medullary phenotype, pushing-border invasion, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and it occurred more frequently in ampullary-duodenal type tumors. Programed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels analyzed in the 22 MMR-deficient ACs revealed that all medullary carcinomas were positive. Nonmedullary MMR-deficient carcinomas expressed PD-L1 in 33% of tumors cells according to the criteria for a combined positive score ≥1, but all were negative according to the tumor proportion score≥1 method.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACs, MMR deficiency is even more frequent (18%) than in colon cancer and often has a Lynch-suggestive profile, thus routine testing is warranted. Male gender, pushing-border infiltration, ampullary-duodenal origin, medullary histology, and tumor-related inflammation have a significantly higher association with MMR deficiency. MMR-deficient tumors have less aggressive behavior. PD-L1 expression is common in medullary-phenotype ACs, thus immunotherapy should be considered at least for this group.

Epidemiology of Cancers of the Small Intestine: Trends, Risk Factors, and Prevention

The latest data from the United States and Europe reveal that rare small intestine cancer is on the rise, with the number of cases having more than doubled over the past 40 years in the developed world. Mortality has grown at a slower pace, thanks to improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, as well as a shift in the etiology of neoplasms affecting the small intestine. Nevertheless, 5-year survival for small intestine adenocarcinomas has lingered at only 35%. Lifestyle in developed nations, including the rise in obesity and physical inactivity, consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and red and processed meats, and occupational exposures may be to blame for the proliferation of this rare cancer. Identification of hereditary and predisposing conditions, likely to blame for some 20% of cases, may help prevent and treat cancers of the small intestine. Studies of the neoplasm have been limited by small sample sizes due to the rarity of the disease, leaving many questions about prevention and treatment yet to be answered.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a clinically and anatomically distinct gastrointestinal cancer that lacks prospective data to support its optimal management. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and inherited conditions that cause gastrointestinal polyps are at especially high risk. Due to a lack of effective surveillance programs resulting in missed or delayed diagnoses only when symptoms develop, this disease is generally discovered at an advanced stage. Surgical resection is the only treatment modality with a chance of cure. Currently accepted treatment considerations are often generalized from large bowel and pancreatic-biliary cancers, due to some anatomic and clinical parallels. Additional research, however, is desperately needed to characterize the unique molecular differences of this disease to better prognosticate patients and establish rational clinical trials that would improve their outcomes.