The p16-Ki-67-HMB45 Immunohistochemistry Scoring System is Highly Concordant With the Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Test to Differentiate Between Melanocytic Nevi and Melanomas

Loss of p16 Immunoexpression and Deletions of CDKN2A in the Progression of Extramammary Paget Disease: An Immunohistochemical and Genetic Study of 24 Invasive/Metastatic Cases

ABSTRACT

Information regarding the genetic alterations in extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is scarce. This study investigated the significance of CDKN2A and MTAP alterations in EMPD progression using immunohistochemistry and panel DNA sequencing. In total, 24 invasive/metastatic EMPD cases were included in this study. The immunoexpression of p16 and MTAP in the primary in situ, primary invasive, and metastatic tumor components was evaluated. Panel DNA sequencing was performed for metastatic tumor components in 5 of the 24 cases. Immunoexpression of p16 in the in situ tumor component was at least partially preserved in all 19 tested cases (100%). By contrast, the invasive tumor component was diffusely or partially lost in 18 (81.8%) of 22 tested cases. Regarding the foci of lymph node metastasis, 13 (81.2%) of the 16 patients showed a significant loss of p16 expression. Loss of MTAP immunoexpression was observed less frequently compared with the loss of p16 expression. CDKN2A homozygous deletions were confirmed in all 5 tested cases by sequencing, whereas MTAP deletions were detected in only 2 cases. In conclusion, p16 expression loss and CDKN2A deletions can be frequently seen in invasive/metastatic cases of EMPD.

Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Features of Small to Big Satellite Nevus Uncover the Nevogenesis of Large/Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevus

The nevogenesis of large/giant congenital melanocytic nevus (lgCMN) is a complex biological process including several integral prenatal stages. Limited by ethical concerns, the debate of whether lgCMN develops from the epidermis to the dermis or in the opposite direction remains controversial. With the present study of the accompanying satellite nevi, we tend to support that lgCMN develops from epidermis to dermis. The satellite nevi were divided into 3 groups: big (diameter >10 mm), medium (>5 mm but ≤10 mm), and small (≤5 mm). Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining (SOX10, Ki67, and p16) were performed to compare the nevocyte infiltration depth as well as the positively stained rates among these satellite nevi. Compared to big satellite nevi, less deeply the nevocytes infiltrated the dermis, as well as more cells expressed SOX10 and Ki67 in the epidermis and fewer cells expressed p16 in the dermis of small satellite nevi. Additionally, two specimens were obtained from each of 4 patients who underwent serial resections of lgCMN at an average interval of 1.75 years to examine the histopathological changes. In the present study, satellite nevi of different sizes represent different stages of lgCMN from early to late, deepening our comprehension of the sequential stages of lgCMN nevogenesis. Initially, abnormal nevocytes seeded, proliferated, and spread along the epidermis. At rete ridges that protrude from the papillary dermis within the epidermis, some nevocytes formed nests and gradually penetrated into the dermis. Eventually, the nevocytes infiltrated the dermis and entered a homeostatic state. This study provides new evidence supporting the theory of epidermal-to-dermal nevogenesis in lgCMN.

The Dark Side of Melanin Secretion in Cutaneous Melanoma Aggressiveness

Skin cancers are among the most common cancers worldwide and are increasingly prevalent. Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is characterized by the malignant transformation of melanocytes in the epidermis. Although CM shows lower incidence than other skin cancers, it is the most aggressive and responsible for the vast majority of skin cancer-related deaths. Indeed, 75% of patients present with invasive or metastatic tumors, even after surgical excision. In CM, the photoprotective pigment melanin, which is produced by melanocytes, plays a central role in the pathology of the disease. Melanin absorbs ultraviolet radiation and scavenges reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) resulting from the radiation exposure. However, the scavenged ROS/RNS modify melanin and lead to the induction of signature DNA damage in CM cells, namely cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, which are known to promote CM immortalization and carcinogenesis. Despite triggering the malignant transformation of melanocytes and promoting initial tumor growth, the presence of melanin inside CM cells is described to negatively regulate their invasiveness by increasing cell stiffness and reducing elasticity. Emerging evidence also indicates that melanin secreted from CM cells is required for the immunomodulation of tumor microenvironment. Indeed, melanin transforms dermal fibroblasts in cancer-associated fibroblasts, suppresses the immune system and promotes tumor angiogenesis, thus sustaining CM progression and metastasis. Here, we review the current knowledge on the role of melanin secretion in CM aggressiveness and the molecular machinery involved, as well as the impact in tumor microenvironment and immune responses. A better understanding of this role and the molecular players involved could enable the modulation of melanin secretion to become a therapeutic strategy to impair CM invasion and metastasis and, hence, reduce the burden of CM-associated deaths.

Comparative Analysis of PRAME Expression in 127 Acral and Nail Melanocytic Lesions

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma), a cancer testis antigen expressed in low levels in gonadal, endometrial, and adrenal gland tissues, has been recently considered a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. The aim of the current study is to perform PRAME immunostaining on a large series of benign and malignant acral lesions to evaluate the reproducibility of data reported in the literature and to validate PRAME as an affordable tool in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant acral melanocytic tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis for PRAME was performed in 127 benign and malignant acral and nail melanocytic lesions. To better correlate PRAME expression with the nature (benign vs. malignant) of the lesions, we categorized PRAME tumor cells percentage positivity and intensity in a cumulative score obtained by adding the quartile of positive tumor cells (0, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+) to PRAME expression intensity in tumor cells (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). Adopting an arbitrary PRAME expression score of < 5 versus ≥5 resulted in a correct identification of 82.5% of benign and 87.1% of malignant lesions. PRAME immunohistochemistry demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of acral melanocytic lesions, however, in line with the previous literature, we identified a subset of challenging cases such as acral Spitz nevi, in situ melanomas, and small, thin, invasive melanomas in which PRAME did not correlate with morphologic features. This suggests that PRAME can be a valid tool to be incorporated in a diagnostic clinicopathologic algorithm, subject to morphologic characteristics.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): A useful diagnostic tool for childhood conjunctival melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Conjunctival melanoma is extremely rare in children and has low rates of resolution. Definitive histopathological diagnosis based exclusively on microscopic findings is sometimes difficult. Thus, early diagnosis and adequate treatment are essential to improve clinical outcomes.

CLINICAL CASE

We present the first case in which the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) diagnostic technique was applied to a 10-year-old boy initially suspected of having amelanotic nevi in his right eye. Based on the 65% of tumor cells with 11q13 (CCND1) copy number gain and 33% with 6p25 (RREB1) gain as measured by the FISH analysis, and on supporting histopathological findings, the diagnosis of conjunctival melanoma could be made. Following a larger re-excision, adjuvant therapy with Mitomycin C (MMC), cryotherapy and an amniotic membrane graft, the patient has remained disease-free during 9 years of long-term follow-up.

CASE DISCUSSION

Every ophthalmologist should remember to consider and not forget the possibility of using FISH analyses during the differential diagnosis of any suspicious conjunctival lesions. Genetic techniques, such as FISH, have led to great advances in the classification of ambiguous lesions. Evidence-based guidelines for diagnosing conjunctival melanoma in the pediatric population are needed to determine the most appropriate strategy for this age group.

Aberrant expression of HMB45 and negative PRAME expression in halo nevi

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, most cutaneous nevi show a gradient of HMB45 (human melanoma black 45) and negative PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) immunostaining, while melanomas often show irregularly positive, diffusely positive or completely negative HMB45 expression, and PRAME immunopositivity. However, we have occasionally observed benign halo nevi with loss of HMB45 gradient, raising diagnostic consideration for melanoma. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the expression pattern of HMB45 and PRAME in nevi with the halo phenomenon (NHP).

METHODS

PRAME and HMB45 staining patterns in 20 cases of NHP and 16 cases of conventional nevi were evaluated using light microscopy. An HMB45 gradient was defined as immunopositivity in only superficial melanocytes. HMB45 aberrant expression consisted of superficial and deep immunopositivity.

RESULTS

Aberrant HMB45 expression was observed in 10 of 20 NHP (50%). A gradient of HMB45 staining was seen in most conventional nevi, with only one showing focal weak expression in the deep dermis (6.3%). All cases of NHP and conventional nevi showed essentially negative immunostaining by PRAME.

CONCLUSION

Aberrant HMB45 expression in NHP is not uncommon and may be a diagnostic pitfall. Negative PRAME immunostaining may be a reassuring finding to help differentiate halo nevus from malignant melanoma.

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Conjunctival Melanocytic Intraepithelial Lesions, Including SOX10, HMB45, Ki67, and P16

PURPOSE

To determine the usefulness of melan-A, SOX10, HMB45, and p16 immunohistochemical stains in the distinction between the low-grade and high-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions, either independently or as components of an immunohistochemical panel.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Institutional pathology records between 2014 and 2018 were searched for all patients with conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions. Biopsies without supporting clinical history or tissue available for review and immunohistochemical analysis were excluded. Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical (p16, SOX10, HMB45, and Ki-67) findings were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent 47 biopsies for conjunctival melanocytic lesions between 2014 and 2018. Pathologic diagnoses were low-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion (n = 18, 38%) and high-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion/melanoma in situ (n = 29, 62%). The addition of melan-A and SOX10 immunohistochemical stains resulted in an upgrade of conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion from low-grade to high-grade in 2 (4%) of 47 cases. The addition of melan-A and SOX10 immunohistochemical stains did not downgrade any of the histomorphologically high-grade lesions. In a clinical-pathologic multivariable model, the parameters most predictive of high-grade melanocytic intraepithelial lesion/melanoma in situ were involvement of the caruncle (odds ratio [OR] = 19, confidence interval [CI] 1.6-212; P = .02] and p16 cytoplasmic H-score >30 (OR = 81, CI 2.7 to >999; P = .01) CONCLUSION: Although the stains for melanocytic markers melan-A and SOX10 facilitate assessment of melanocytic intraepithelial lesions, the current immunohistochemical panels have limited value in distinction between the low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial melanocytic proliferations and need to be used judiciously.

Pathology-based Biomarkers Useful for Clinical Decisions in Melanoma

The dramatic recent advances in therapy of melanoma require a more personalized and precise diagnostic approach to aid in clinical decisions. Tissue-based biomarkers in pathology have diagnostic, prognostic and predictive relevance. Herein we review the most commonly used pathology-based biomarkers in melanoma. Most of these biomarkers are evaluated through immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE), and are widely available in clinical pathology laboratories. We describe the utility of MART1/Ki67, p16, PRAME, markers of lymphovascular invasion (D2-40, CD31, D2-40/MITF, CD31/SOX-10), BRAF V600E, NRAS, KIT, BAP1, ALK, NTRK, PD-L1, TERT, PTEN, iNOS, and MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) in the evaluation of melanoma specimens. Correct interpretation and awareness of the significance of these biomarkers is crucial for pathologists, dermatologists, and oncologists who take care of melanoma patients.

Conjunctival nevi and melanoma: multiparametric immunohistochemical analysis, including p16, SOX10, HMB45, and Ki-67

The role of p16 in the diagnosis and prognosis of conjunctival melanocytic lesions in the context of other clinical and immunohistochemical parameters has not been systematically explored. This study was conducted to determine whether p16 is a useful parameter in the diagnosis and prognosis of conjunctival melanocytic nevi and melanoma, either independently or as a component of immunohistochemical panels. Sixty-one patients underwent 61 biopsies for conjunctival melanocytic lesions between 2014 and 2018. Pathologic diagnoses were melanoma (n = 25, 41%), nevus (n = 21, 34%), and conjunctival melanocytic lesion of uncertain malignant potential (n = 15, 25%). The biopsies were assessed for expression of p16, SOX10, HMB45, and Ki-67. In a multivariable model, the parameters most predictive of melanoma versus nevus were diffuse HMB45 staining (odds ratio [OR] = 45, confidence interval [CI] = 4.4-457, P = .02] and p16 nuclear H-score≤115 (OR = 9.5, CI = 1.2-77; P = .04). There was no association of p16 expression with melanoma thickness. Next-generation sequencing identified no CDKN2A mutations or copy number alterations in 12 conjunctival melanomas, including the tumors with absent p16 expression. This study demonstrates that p16 immunohistochemical stain is useful in distinguishing conjunctival melanocytic nevi from melanoma, particularly in combination with HMB45. P16 expression does not appear to correlate with CDKN2A status and melanoma thickness.