1
|
Geukens T, Maetens M, Hooper JE, Oesterreich S, Lee AV, Miller L, Atkinson JM, Rosenzweig M, Puhalla S, Thorne H, Devereux L, Bowtell D, Loi S, Bacon ER, Ihle K, Song M, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Welm AL, Gauchay L, Murali R, Chanda P, Karacay A, Naceur-Lombardelli C, Bridger H, Swanton C, Jamal-Hanjani M, Kollath L, True L, Morrissey C, Chambers M, Chinnaiyan AM, Wilson A, Mehra R, Reichert Z, Carey LA, Perou CM, Kelly E, Maeda D, Goto A, Kulka J, Székely B, Szasz AM, Tőkés AM, Van Den Bogaert W, Floris G, Desmedt C. Research autopsy programmes in oncology: shared experience from 14 centres across the world. J Pathol 2024; 263:150-165. [PMID: 38551513 DOI: 10.1002/path.6271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
While there is a great clinical need to understand the biology of metastatic cancer in order to treat it more effectively, research is hampered by limited sample availability. Research autopsy programmes can crucially advance the field through synchronous, extensive, and high-volume sample collection. However, it remains an underused strategy in translational research. Via an extensive questionnaire, we collected information on the study design, enrolment strategy, study conduct, sample and data management, and challenges and opportunities of research autopsy programmes in oncology worldwide. Fourteen programmes participated in this study. Eight programmes operated 24 h/7 days, resulting in a lower median postmortem interval (time between death and start of the autopsy, 4 h) compared with those operating during working hours (9 h). Most programmes (n = 10) succeeded in collecting all samples within a median of 12 h after death. A large number of tumour sites were sampled during each autopsy (median 15.5 per patient). The median number of samples collected per patient was 58, including different processing methods for tumour samples but also non-tumour tissues and liquid biopsies. Unique biological insights derived from these samples included metastatic progression, treatment resistance, disease heterogeneity, tumour dormancy, interactions with the tumour micro-environment, and tumour representation in liquid biopsies. Tumour patient-derived xenograft (PDX) or organoid (PDO) models were additionally established, allowing for drug discovery and treatment sensitivity assays. Apart from the opportunities and achievements, we also present the challenges related with postmortem sample collections and strategies to overcome them, based on the shared experience of these 14 programmes. Through this work, we hope to increase the transparency of postmortem tissue donation, to encourage and aid the creation of new programmes, and to foster collaborations on these unique sample collections. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatjana Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marion Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jody E Hooper
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Steffi Oesterreich
- University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, and Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adrian V Lee
- University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, and Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lori Miller
- University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, and Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jenny M Atkinson
- University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, and Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Margaret Rosenzweig
- University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, and Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shannon Puhalla
- University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, and Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather Thorne
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Lisa Devereux
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Sherene Loi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Eliza R Bacon
- Center for Precision Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kena Ihle
- Center for Precision Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Mihae Song
- Center for Precision Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Alana L Welm
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lisa Gauchay
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Pharto Chanda
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ali Karacay
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Hayley Bridger
- Cancer Research UK, and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Mariam Jamal-Hanjani
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Cancer Metastasis Laboratory, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A Carey
- University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin Kelly
- University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Daichi Maeda
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Akiteru Goto
- Department of Cellular and Organ Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Janina Kulka
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Borbála Székely
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - A Marcell Szasz
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anna-Mária Tőkés
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dufayet L, Langrand J, Ludes B. Risk of occupational infection in forensic workers: a review. Forensic Sci Res 2023; 8:1-4. [PMID: 37415800 PMCID: PMC10265965 DOI: 10.1093/fsr/owad001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 07/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The occupational risk of infection in forensic workers is a cause for concern, furthermore in the current context of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. In order to characterize this risk, we performed an extended review of the literature on occupational infections occurring in forensic workers. Seventeen articles were included. Direct contamination by aerosolization was the main mode of transmission reported, with 17 cases of tuberculosis. Indirect contamination was described as the mode of transmission in 10 cases (five cases of blastomycosis, two cases of tuberculosis, two Streptococcus pyogenes, and one case of human immunodeficiency virus). In all the other included cases, the mode of transmission was unknown. For two of them, the information provided was sufficient to link them to occupational exposure (one case of toxoplasmosis, one case of tuberculosis). For the remaining 10 cases, the link was uncertain (six cases of tuberculosis, three of hepatitis B, and one of COVID-19). Even if there is probably significant under-declaration, the number of infections linked to an occupational risk in forensic workers is not alarming, thanks to effective preventive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jerome Langrand
- Centre AntiPoison de Paris, Fédération de Toxicologie, APHP - Hôpital Fernand Widal, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Ludes
- Université de Paris-CNRS UMR 8045 Babel, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Médico-Légal, 75012, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|