1
|
Baker DR, Glau CL, Himebauch AS, Arnoldi S, Rosenblatt S, Keim G, Loscalzo SM, Weber MD, Cohen M, Quartermain MD, Kaplan SL, Sutton RM, Nishisaki A, Conlon TW. Evolution and Impact of a Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program in a PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024:00130478-990000000-00366. [PMID: 39023322 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use on clinicians within a PICU and to assess infrastructural elements of our POCUS program development. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING Large academic, noncardiac PICU in the United States. SUBJECTS Patients in a PICU who had diagnostic POCUS performed. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, 7201 diagnostic POCUS studies were ordered; 1930 (26.8%) had a quality assurance (QA) record generated in an independent POCUS QA database. The cardiac domain was most frequently imaged (81.0% of ordered studies, 81.2% of reviewed studies). POCUS images changed clinician understanding of pathophysiology in 563 of 1930 cases (29.2%); when this occurred, management was changed in 318 of 563 cases (56.5%). Cardiac POCUS studies altered clinician suspected pathophysiology in 30.1% of cases (472/1568), compared with 21.5% (91/362) in noncardiac studies (p = 0.06). Among cases where POCUS changed clinician understanding, management changed more often following cardiac than noncardiac POCUS (p = 0.02). Clinicians identified a need for cardiology consultation or complete echocardiograms in 294 of 1568 cardiac POCUS studies (18.8%). Orders for POCUS imaging increased by 94.9%, and revenue increased by 159.4%, from initial to final study year. QA database use by both clinicians and reviewers decreased annually as QA processes evolved in the setting of technologic growth and unit expansion. CONCLUSIONS Diagnostic POCUS imaging in the PICU frequently yields information that alters diagnosis and changes management. As PICU POCUS use increased, QA processes evolved resulting in decreased use of our initial QA database. Modifications to QA processes are likely necessary as clinical contexts change over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Baker
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christie L Glau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam S Himebauch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sara Arnoldi
- Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Rosenblatt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Garrett Keim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Steven M Loscalzo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D Weber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Meryl Cohen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael D Quartermain
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Summer L Kaplan
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert M Sutton
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thomas W Conlon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chan JC, Menon AP, Rotta AT, Choo JT, Hornik CP, Lee JH. Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Septic Cardiomyopathy in Critically Ill Children: A Narrative Review. Crit Care Explor 2024; 6:e1114. [PMID: 38916605 PMCID: PMC11208091 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000001114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In critically ill children with severe sepsis, septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) denotes the subset of patients who have myocardial dysfunction with poor response to fluid and inotropic support, and higher mortality risk. The objective of this review was to evaluate the role of speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) in the diagnosis and prognosis of pediatric SCM in the PICU setting. DATA SOURCES We performed detailed searches using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Reference lists of all included studies were also examined for further identification of potentially relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION Studies with the following medical subject headings and keywords were selected: speckle-tracking echocardiography, strain imaging, global longitudinal strain, echocardiography, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, septic cardiomyopathy, and myocardial dysfunction. DATA EXTRACTION The following data were extracted from all included studies: demographics, diagnoses, echocardiographic parameters, severity of illness, PICU management, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS STE is a relatively new echocardiographic technique that directly quantifies myocardial contractility. It has high sensitivity in diagnosing SCM, correlates well with illness severity, and has good prognosticating value as compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters. Further studies are required to establish its role in evaluating biventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and to investigate whether it has a role in individualizing treatment and improving treatment outcomes in this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS STE is a useful adjunct to conventional measures of cardiac function on 2D-echocardiography in the assessment of pediatric SCM in the PICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Charmaine Chan
- Pediatric Cardiology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
- Singhealth Duke NUS Pediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Anuradha P. Menon
- Singhealth Duke NUS Pediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Children’s ICU, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alexandre T. Rotta
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jonathan T.L. Choo
- Pediatric Cardiology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
- Singhealth Duke NUS Pediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Christoph P. Hornik
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Jan Hau Lee
- Singhealth Duke NUS Pediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Children’s ICU, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
González R, Urbano J, López-Herce J. Resuscitating the macro- vs. microcirculation in septic shock. Curr Opin Pediatr 2024; 36:274-281. [PMID: 38446225 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes current literature about the relationships between macro and microcirculation and their practical clinical implications in children with septic shock. RECENT FINDINGS Current evidence from experimental and clinical observational studies in children and adults with septic shock reveals that the response to treatment and resuscitation is widely variable. Furthermore, there is a loss of hemodynamic coherence, as resuscitation-induced improvement in macrocirculation (systemic hemodynamic parameters) does not necessarily result in a parallel improvement in the microcirculation. Therefore, patient-tailored monitoring is essential in order to adjust treatment requirements during resuscitation in septic shock. Optimal monitoring must integrate macrocirculation (heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac output, and ultrasound images), microcirculation (videomicroscopy parameters and capillary refill time) and cellular metabolism (lactic acid, central venous blood oxygen saturation, and difference of central venous to arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure). SUMMARY There is a dire need for high-quality studies to assess the relationships between macrocirculation, microcirculation and tissue metabolism in children with septic shock. The development of reliable and readily available microcirculation and tissue perfusion biomarkers (other than lactic acid) is also necessary to improve monitoring and treatment adjustment in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael González
- Pediatric Intensive Care Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
- Health Research Institute of the Gregorio Marañón Hospital
- Maternal and Child Public Health Department. School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid
- Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Development Origin Network (RICORS) RD21/0012/0011, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Urbano
- Pediatric Intensive Care Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
- Health Research Institute of the Gregorio Marañón Hospital
- Maternal and Child Public Health Department. School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid
- Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Development Origin Network (RICORS) RD21/0012/0011, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús López-Herce
- Pediatric Intensive Care Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
- Health Research Institute of the Gregorio Marañón Hospital
- Maternal and Child Public Health Department. School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid
- Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Development Origin Network (RICORS) RD21/0012/0011, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ip PYF, Periasamy U, Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D, Kantor DB. Management Changes After Echocardiography Are Associated With Improved Outcomes in Critically Ill Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024:00130478-990000000-00329. [PMID: 38591948 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate management changes and outcomes in critically ill children after formal echocardiography. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. SETTING Tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS Patients from 1 to 18 years who had formal echocardiography within 72 hours of ICU admission and who were intubated and on vasoactive infusions at the time of the study. Patients were stratified into two cardiac function groups: 1) near-normal cardiac function and 2) depressed cardiac function. METHODS Clinical variables were abstracted from the electronic medical record and placed in time sequence relative to echocardiography. Vasoactive and fluid management strategies in place before echocardiography were associated with markers of tissue perfusion and volume overload. Management changes after echocardiography were characterized and associated with outcomes. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Among patients eventually found to have depressed cardiac function, the use of vasoconstrictors was associated with worse lactate clearance and oxygen extraction ratio. Use of vasoconstrictors in this cohort was also associated with a more liberal fluid management strategy, evidence of increased lung water, and a worse Spo2/Fio2. An echocardiogram demonstrated depressed cardiac function was likely to be followed by management changes that favored inotropes and more conservative fluid administration. Patients with depressed cardiac function who were switched to inotropes were more likely to be extubated and to wean off vasoactive support compared with those patients who remained on vasoconstrictors. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with depressed cardiac function, alterations in management strategy after echocardiography are associated with shortened duration of intensive care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui Yin Florence Ip
- Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Uvaraj Periasamy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Steven J Staffa
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David Zurakowski
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David B Kantor
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Swami VS, V. LA, Ghosh S, Reddy M. Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction in Pediatric Septic Shock: Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcome-A Prospective Observational Study. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2024; 13:87-94. [PMID: 38571983 PMCID: PMC10987216 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a paucity of literature on the prevalence, predictors, prognostic markers, and outcomes of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SMD) in pediatric septic shock. The objectives of our study were to estimate the prevalence of SMD in pediatric septic shock by point-of-care functional echocardiography (POCFE) and to study the association of SMD with severity of illness, organ dysfunctions, and outcomes. This prospective, observational study was conducted over a period of 1 year (from July 2018 to July 2019) in a 12-bed, tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of an academic and referral hospital in South India. Children presenting with septic shock were enrolled in the study. POCFE was done within 6 hours of PICU admission and patients were categorized as having SMD based on POCFE findings. The prevalence of SMD (left ventricle ± right ventricle) was 32% (32/100). More than half of the children (54.5%) died in SMD group, whereas only 7.5% died in non-SMD group ( p < 0.001). SMD was associated with higher organ dysfunctions, worse patient outcomes, and was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. The median lactate levels were higher in SMD group (3.15 [2.7, 5] vs. 2 [1.3, 2.7], p < 0.001) as compared with non-SMD group. We observed significantly lower median lactate clearance at 6 hours in SMD than non-SMD (30.0% [-14.44, 44.22] vs. 59.8% [45.83, 71.43], p < 0.001). Lactate levels at 6 hours with a threshold of 2.4 mmol/L was a good predictor of SMD with sensitivity and specificity of 73 and 80%, respectively. SMD is not an uncommon entity in children with septic shock. SMD was associated with worse patient outcomes, organ dysfunction, and mortality. Serum lactate trends may predict SMD and can be used as prognosticate markers as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viresh S. Swami
- Dr. Bidari's Ashwini Institute of Child Health and Research Centre, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
| | - Lalitha A. V.
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, St John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Santu Ghosh
- Department of Biostatistics, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Mounika Reddy
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bibinagar, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Naber CE, Salt MD. POCUS in the PICU: A Narrative Review of Evidence-Based Bedside Ultrasound Techniques Ready for Prime-Time in Pediatric Critical Care. J Intensive Care Med 2024:8850666231224391. [PMID: 38193214 DOI: 10.1177/08850666231224391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an accessible technology that can identify and treat life-threatening pathology in real time without exposing children to ionizing radiation. We aim to review current evidence supporting the use of POCUS by pediatric intensivists with novice-level experience with bedside ultrasound. Current evidence supports the universal adoption of POCUS-guided internal jugular venous catheter placement and arterial line placement by pediatric critical care physicians. Focused cardiac ultrasound performed by PICU physicians who have completed appropriate training with quality assurance measures in place can identify life-threatening cardiac pathology in most children and important physiological changes in children with septic shock. POCUS of the lungs, pleural space, and diaphragm have great potential to provide valuable information at the bedside after validation of these techniques for use in the PICU with additional research. Based on currently available evidence, a generalizable and attainable POCUS educational platform for pediatric intensivists should include training in vascular access techniques and focused cardiac examination. A POCUS educational program should strive to establish credentialing and quality assurance programs that can be expanded when additional research validates the adoption of additional POCUS techniques by pediatric intensive care physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Naber
- Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael D Salt
- Massachusetts General Hospital; Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah AS, Sobolewski B, Chon S, Cruse B, Glisson MD, Zackoff MW, Davis D, Zhang Y, Schumacher DJ, Geis GL. Just-in-Time, Just-in-Place Virtual Training in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Novel Approach to Impact the Perfusion Exam. ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2023; 14:901-911. [PMID: 37614829 PMCID: PMC10443635 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s414022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Early identification of shock is vital in decreasing morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Although residents are taught the perfusion portion of the rapid cardiopulmonary assessment at our institution, they perform it at the bedside with 8.4% completing 1 part of the assessment and 9.7% verbalizing their findings. Newer technologies, including virtual reality (VR), offer immersive training to close this clinical gap. Objective To assess senior pediatric residents' performance of a perfusion exam and verbalization of their perfusion assessment following VR-based Just-in-Time/Just-in-Place (JITP) training compared to video-based JITP training. We hypothesized that JITP media training was feasible, and VR JITP was more effective than video-based training. Methods Residents were randomized to VR or video-based training during shifts in the emergency department. Clinical performance was assessed by review of a video-recorded patient encounter using a standardized assessment tool and by an in-person, two question shock assessment. Residents completed a survey assessing attitudes toward their intervention at the time of training. Results Eighty-five senior pediatric residents were enrolled; 84 completed training. Sixty-four (76%) residents had a patient encounter available for video review (VR 33; Video 31). Fourteen residents in the VR group (42.4%, 95% CI 25.5% to 60.8%) and 13 residents in the video group (41.9%, 95% CI 24.6% to 60.9%) completed a perfusion exam AND verbalized an assessment during their next clinical encounter (X2 p-value 1.00). Fifty-one of 64 residents (79.7%) completed the two-step shock assessment; 50 (98%) agreed with supervising physician's assessment. VR was rated more effective than reading, low-fidelity manikin, standardized patient encounters, traditional didactic teaching, and online learning. Video was rated more effective than online learning, traditional didactic teaching, and reading. Conclusion Novel video and VR JITP perfusion exam and assessment trainings are impactful and well-received by senior pediatric residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish S Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California – San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Brad Sobolewski
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sabina Chon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Bradly Cruse
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Mike D Glisson
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Matthew W Zackoff
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - David Davis
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Yin Zhang
- Emergency Services, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Daniel J Schumacher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gary L Geis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Center for Simulation and Research, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ranjit S, Kissoon N, Argent A, Inwald D, Ventura AMC, Jaborinsky R, Sankar J, de Souza DC, Natraj R, De Oliveira CF, Samransamruajkit R, Jayashree M, Schlapbach LJ. Haemodynamic support for paediatric septic shock: a global perspective. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2023; 7:588-598. [PMID: 37354910 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00103-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
Septic shock is a leading cause of hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality for children worldwide. In 2020, the paediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) issued evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children with septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction based on the evidence available at the time. There are now more trials from multiple settings, including low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), addressing optimal fluid choice and amount, selection and timing of vasoactive infusions, and optimal monitoring and therapeutic endpoints. In response to developments in adult critical care to trial personalised haemodynamic management algorithms, it is timely to critically reassess the current state of applying SSC guidelines in LMIC settings. In this Viewpoint, we briefly outline the challenges to improve sepsis care in LMICs and then discuss three key concepts that are relevant to management of children with septic shock around the world, especially in LMICs. These concepts include uncertainties surrounding the early recognition of paediatric septic shock, choices for initial haemodynamic support, and titration of ongoing resuscitation to therapeutic endpoints. Specifically, given the evolving understanding of clinical phenotypes, we focus on the controversies surrounding the concepts of early fluid resuscitation and vasoactive agent use, including insights gained from experience in LMICs and high-income countries. We outline the key components of sepsis management that are both globally relevant and translatable to low-resource settings, with a view to open the conversation to the large variety of treatment pathways, especially in LMICs. We emphasise the role of simple and easily available monitoring tools to apply the SSC guidelines and to tailor individualised support to the patient's cardiovascular physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suchitra Ranjit
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Apollo Children's Hospital, Chennai, India.
| | | | - Andrew Argent
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - David Inwald
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andréa Maria Cordeiro Ventura
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Roberto Jaborinsky
- Northeastern National University, Corrientes, Argentina; Latin American Society of Pediatric Intensive Care (LARed Network), Montevideo, Uruguay; SLACIP Sociedad Latinoamericana de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jhuma Sankar
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology and Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Daniela Carla de Souza
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Latin American Sepsis Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rajeswari Natraj
- Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, Apollo Children's Hospitals, Chennai, India
| | | | - Rujipat Samransamruajkit
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Muralidharan Jayashree
- Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Intensive Care and Neonatology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ruscica A, Chen C, Ng L. Updates in pediatric ultrasound. Curr Opin Pediatr 2023; 35:324-330. [PMID: 36974449 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has various diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the pediatric acute care setting that have an impact on clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS POCUS can improve diagnostic efficiency and expedite management in pediatric patients who present to the emergency department with common complaints such as respiratory distress, abdominal pain, shock, and pain. SUMMARY Rapid advancements in POCUS have allowed it to become a powerful tool in pediatric care. As the clinical applications of ultrasound diversify, research is needed to evaluate impacts on healthcare outcomes, delivery, and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Ruscica
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miranda M, Nadel S. Pediatric Sepsis: a Summary of Current Definitions and Management Recommendations. CURRENT PEDIATRICS REPORTS 2023; 11:29-39. [PMID: 37252329 PMCID: PMC10169116 DOI: 10.1007/s40124-023-00286-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Pediatric sepsis remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children. This review will summarize the main aspects of the definition, the current evidence base for interventions discuss some controversial themes and point towards possible areas of improvement. Recent Findings Controversy remains regarding the accurate definition, resuscitation fluid volume and type, choice of vasoactive/inotropic agents, and antibiotic depending upon specific infection risks. Many adjunctive therapies have been suggested with theoretical benefits, although definitive recommendations are not yet supported by data. We describe best practice recommendations based on international guidelines, a review of primary literature, and a discussion of ongoing clinical trials and the nuances of therapeutic choices. Summary Early diagnosis and timely intervention with antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and vasoactive medications are the most important interventions in sepsis. The implementation of protocols, resource-adjusted sepsis bundles, and advanced technologies will have an impact on reducing sepsis mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Miranda
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Nadel
- St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khot N, Joshi S, Malwade S, Chavan S, Mane SV, Agarkhedkar S, Arora A. A Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Neonatal Right Ventricular Function in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Babies. Cureus 2023; 15:e37166. [PMID: 37153277 PMCID: PMC10162581 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The right ventricle (RV) in the fetus is the predominant chamber, accounting for about 60% of the total cardiac output. The majority of the RV outflow volume is diverted from the pulmonary artery via the ductus arteriosus to the descending aorta. After birth, the RV undergoes extensive structural and functional modifications. The RV undergoes an improper transition from fetal to neonatal circulation in sick neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) babies. Functional echocardiography is now commonly being used in most NICUs as it is a noninvasive and bedside investigation that gives an immediate evaluation of hemodynamics and can be taken into consideration as an extension of clinical assessment to study a critically unwell neonate. Therefore, a study of RV functions in NICU neonates will help in better understanding the neonatal cardiopulmonary response to different diseases. Thus, this study aimed to assess RV functions in neonates getting admitted to the NICU of a tertiary care institute. Methodology This observational, cross-sectional study was approved by the Research & Recognition Committee of Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune. In total, 35 cases of term neonates admitted to the NICU at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study after obtaining consent from their parents. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed by a trained pediatric cardiologist, and the findings were substantiated by a neonatologist trained in echocardiography. Results Our study found a strong association between tricuspid inflow velocity and neonates with sepsis. Similarly, a significant association was observed between abnormal tricuspid Inflow velocity (E/A and E/E') and neonates requiring inotropic support. Conclusions Data on the normal values of different echocardiographic parameters of the systolic and diastolic function of the RV during the neonatal phase of life are currently limited. Our data offer preliminary insights into this topic. Early echocardiography and intervention are advisable, especially in neonates with sepsis and requiring inotropic support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Khot
- Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| | - Santosh Joshi
- Pediatric Cardiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| | - Sudhir Malwade
- Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| | - Sanjay Chavan
- Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| | - Shailaja V Mane
- Pediatric Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| | - Sharad Agarkhedkar
- Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| | - Amodini Arora
- Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weber MD, Lim JKB, Ginsburg S, Conlon T, Nishisaki A. Translating Guidelines into Practical Practice: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Pediatric Critical Care Clinicians. Crit Care Clin 2023; 39:385-406. [PMID: 36898781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is now transitioning from an emerging technology to a standard of care for critically ill children. POCUS can provide immediate answers to clinical questions impacting management and outcomes within this fragile population. Recently published international guidelines specific to POCUS use in neonatal and pediatric critical care populations now complement previous Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. The authors review consensus statements within guidelines, identify important limitations to statements, and provide considerations for the successful implementation of POCUS in the pediatric critical care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Weber
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Joel K B Lim
- Children's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sarah Ginsburg
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Conlon
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lu JC, Riley A, Conlon T, Levine JC, Kwan C, Miller-Hance WC, Soni-Patel N, Slesnick T. Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Children: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2023; 36:265-277. [PMID: 36697294 DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound has the potential to improve patient care, but its application to children requires consideration of anatomic and physiologic differences from adult populations, and corresponding technical aspects of performance. This document is the product of an American Society of Echocardiography task force composed of representatives from pediatric cardiology, pediatric critical care medicine, pediatric emergency medicine, pediatric anesthesiology, and others, assembled to provide expert guidance. This diverse group aimed to identify common considerations across disciplines to guide evolution of indications, and to identify common requirements and infrastructure necessary for optimal performance, training, and quality assurance in the practice of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound in children. The recommendations presented are intended to facilitate collaboration among subspecialties and with pediatric echocardiography laboratories by identifying key considerations regarding (1) indications, (2) imaging recommendations, (3) training and competency assessment, and (4) quality assurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy C Lu
- University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alan Riley
- Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Conlon
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jami C Levine
- Harvard School of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charisse Kwan
- University of Western Ontario, Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Timothy Slesnick
- Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gupta S, Sankar J. Advances in Shock Management and Fluid Resuscitation in Children. Indian J Pediatr 2023; 90:280-288. [PMID: 36715864 PMCID: PMC9885414 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-022-04434-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Shock in children is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, particularly in resource-limited settings. The principles of management include early recognition, fluid resuscitation, appropriate inotropes, antibiotic therapy in sepsis, supportive therapy for organ dysfunction, and regular hemodynamic monitoring. During the past decade, each step has undergone several changes and evolved as evidence that has been translated into recommendations and practice. There is a paradigm shift from protocolized-based care to personalized management, from liberal strategies to restrictive strategies in terms of fluids, blood transfusion, ventilation, and antibiotics, and from clinical monitoring to multimodal monitoring using bedside technologies. However, uncertainties are still prevailing in terms of the volume of fluids, use of steroids, and use of extracorporeal and newer therapies while managing shock. These changes have been summarized along with evidence in this article with the aim of adopting an evidence-based approach while managing children with shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samriti Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Jhuma Sankar
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room 3055, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Babu S, Sreedhar R, Munaf M, Gadhinglajkar SV. Sepsis in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: An Updated Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:1000-1012. [PMID: 36922317 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Sepsis remains among the most common causes of mortality in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Extensive literature is available regarding managing sepsis in pediatric patients without CHD. Because the cardiovascular pathophysiology of children with CHD differs entirely from their typical peers, the available diagnosis and management recommendations for sepsis cannot be implemented directly in children with CHD. This review discusses the risk factors, etiopathogenesis, available diagnostic tools, resuscitation protocols, and anesthetic management of pediatric patients suffering from various congenital cardiac lesions. Further research should focus on establishing a standard guideline for managing children with CHD with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saravana Babu
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal institute for medical sciences and technology, Trivandrum, India.
| | - Rupa Sreedhar
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal institute for medical sciences and technology, Trivandrum, India
| | - Mamatha Munaf
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal institute for medical sciences and technology, Trivandrum, India
| | - Shrinivas V Gadhinglajkar
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal institute for medical sciences and technology, Trivandrum, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaiser RS, Sarkar M, Raut SK, Mahapatra MK, Zaman MAU, Roy O, Chowdhoury SR, Nandi M. A Study to Compare Ultrasound-guided and Clinically Guided Fluid Management in Children with Septic Shock. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023; 27:139-146. [PMID: 36865513 PMCID: PMC9973056 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the role of ultrasound during initial fluid resuscitation along with clinical guidance in reducing the incidence of fluid overload on day 3 in children with septic shock. Materials and methods It was a prospective, parallel limb open-labeled randomized controlled superiority trial done in the PICU of a government-aided tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. Patient enrolment took place between June 2021 and March 2022. Fifty-six children aged between 1 month and 12 years, with proven or suspected septic shock, were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided or clinically guided fluid boluses (1:1 ratio) and subsequently followed up for various outcomes. The primary outcome was frequency of fluid overload on day 3 of admission. The treatment group received ultrasound-guided fluid boluses along with the clinical guidance and the control group received the same but without ultrasound guidance upto 60 mL/kg of fluid boluses. Results The frequency of fluid overload on day 3 of admission was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (25% vs 62%, p = 0.012) as was the median (IQR) cumulative fluid balance percentage on day 3 [6.5 (3.3-10.3) vs 11.3 (5.4-17.5), p = 0.02]. The amount of fluid bolus administered was also significantly lower by ultrasound [median 40 (30-50) vs 50 (40-80) mL/kg, p = 0.003]. Resuscitation time was shorter in the ultrasound group (13.4 ± 5.6 vs 20.5 ± 8 h, p = 0.002). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided fluid boluses were found to be significantly better than clinically guided therapy, in preventing fluid overload and its associated complications in children with septic shock. These factors make ultrasound a potentially useful tool for resuscitation of children with septic shock in the PICU. How to cite this article Kaiser RS, Sarkar M, Raut SK, Mahapatra MK, Uz Zaman MA, Roy O, et al. A Study to Compare Ultrasound-guided and Clinically Guided Fluid Management in Children with Septic Shock. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(2):139-146.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Sohail Kaiser
- Department of Pediatrics, Kolkata Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Mihir Sarkar
- Department of Pediatrics, Kolkata Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sumantra Kumar Raut
- Department of Nephrology, North Bengal Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal India
| | | | | | - Oishik Roy
- Department of Pediatrics, Kolkata Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Satyabrata Roy Chowdhoury
- Department of Pediatrics, North Bengal Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal India,Satyabrata Roy Chowdhoury, Department of Pediatrics, North Bengal Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, Phone: +91 9433765529, e-mail:
| | - Mousumi Nandi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kolkata Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huang D, Watkins LA, Weinschreider J, Ghazi A, Wang H, Dadiz R. Simulation-based Ultrasound Curriculum for Novice Clinicians to Assess Neonatal Endotracheal Tube Position. J Med Ultrasound 2023; 31:40-47. [PMID: 37180626 PMCID: PMC10173824 DOI: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_143_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the efficacy of a simulation-based mastery curriculum to train clinicians with limited-to-no sonography experience how to use ultrasound (US) to assess neonatal endotracheal tube (ETT) positioning. Methods In a single-centered, prospective, educational study, 29 neonatology clinicians participated in a simulation-based mastery curriculum composed of a didactic lecture, followed by a one-on-one simulation session using a newly designed, three-dimensional (3D) printed US phantom model of the neonatal trachea and aorta. After mastery training, clinicians were evaluated with a performance checklist on their skills obtaining US images and assessing ETT positioning in the US phantom model. They also completed pre- and postcurriculum knowledge assessment tests and self-assessment surveys. The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and repeated measures analysis of variance. Results The mean checklist score improved significantly during three attempts (mean difference: 2.6552; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2578-3.0525; P < 0.0001). The mean time to perform US decreased significantly from the first to third attempt (mean difference: -1.8276 min; 95% CI: -3.3391 to - 0.3161; P = 0.0196). In addition, there was a significant improvement in median knowledge assessment scores (50% vs. 80%; P < 0.0001) and survey ratings on knowledge and self-efficacy (P < 0.0001). Conclusion Clinicians with limited-to-no sonography experience demonstrated improved knowledge and skill acquisition in using US to assess ETT positioning through simulation-based mastery training. The use of 3D modeling enhances simulation experiences and optimizes the quality of training during limited opportunities to achieve procedural competency in a controlled environment before further application into the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Huang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Laura A. Watkins
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Address for correspondence: Dr. Laura A. Watkins, Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, 9 Floor Harrisburg Hospital, 111 S Front Street, Harrisburg 17101, Pennsylvania, USA. E-mail:
| | - James Weinschreider
- Department of Technology, State University of New York, Oswego, New York, USA
| | - Ahmed Ghazi
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Hongyue Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Rita Dadiz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
[Value of functional echocardiographic parameters in predicting refractory septic shock in neonates]. ZHONGGUO DANG DAI ER KE ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PEDIATRICS 2022; 24:1213-1218. [PMID: 36398546 PMCID: PMC9678061 DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the value of functional echocardiographic parameters in predicting refractory septic shock in neonates. METHODS A total of 72 neonates with septic shock were enrolled. According to the highest value of septic shock score, they were divided into two groups: refractory (n=30) and non-refractory (n=42). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical data, laboratory findings, and functional echocardiographic parameters. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of functional echocardiographic parameters in predicting refractory septic shock. RESULTS Compared with the non-refractory group, the refractory group had significantly lower cardiac output and cardiac index (CI) and a significantly higher mean arterial pressure (MAP)/CI ratio (P<0.05). CI had a cut-off value of 2.6 L/(min·m2), a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 83%, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.841 in predicting septic shock-related death (P<0.05), and MAP/CI ratio had a cut-off value of 11.4, a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 73%, and an AUC of 0.769 (P<0.05). CI had a cut-off value of 2.9 L/(min·m2), a sensitivity of 69%, a specificity of 69%, and an AUC of 0.717 in predicting all-cause death within 28 days (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS CI and MAP/CI ratio can be useful for early prediction of septic shock-related death in neonates.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gatelli IF, Vitelli O, Fossati M, De Rienzo F, Chiesa G, Martinelli S. Neonatal Septic Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring in Preterm Neonates in an NICU: Added Value of Electrical Cardiometry in Real-Time Tailoring of Management and Therapeutic Strategies. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39:1401-1404. [PMID: 33723835 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrical cardiometry is an impedance-based monitoring technique that provides data on several hemodynamic parameters in a noninvasive way. There is limited information on clinical utility of the application of this technique in neonates. STUDY DESIGN In this study, we describe the case of a preterm neonate born at 302/7 weeks of gestational age who developed severe systemic infection with fluid refractory septic shock on day 2 of life. DISCUSSION Electrical cardiometry was used and proved very helpful in real-time guiding the choice and the dosing of the most appropriate inotrope drugs in this patient. In addition, it promptly underlined an abrupt drop of systemic vascular resistances occurring after administration of the first dose of antibiotic, thus warning the attending neonatologist to institute appropriate treatment before the clinical conditions could further worsen. CONCLUSION This case report suggests that electrical cardiometry could be a useful tool in assessing, monitoring, and guiding care of neonates who develop severe septic shock. We suggest that electrical cardiometry is a promising approach in the management strategies of such patients that warrants informative clinical trials. KEY POINTS · Electrical cardiometry was helpful in real-time decision-making.. · Electrical cardiometry reported hemodynamic perturbations before worsening of clinical conditions.. · Electrical cardiometry should be included in the management of critical patients..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Italo F Gatelli
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio Vitelli
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Fossati
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca De Rienzo
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Chiesa
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Martinelli
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Persson JN, Kim JS, Good RJ. Diagnostic Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN PEDIATRICS 2022; 8:151-173. [PMID: 36277259 PMCID: PMC9264295 DOI: 10.1007/s40746-022-00250-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Recent Findings Summary Supplementary Information
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica N. Persson
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th, Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th, Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - John S. Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th, Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Ryan J. Good
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th, Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Shock is a life-threatening condition in children in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), with several controversies. This systematic review summarizes the etiology, pathophysiology and mortality of shock in children in LMIC. METHODS We searched for studies reporting on children with shock in LMIC in PubMed, Embase and through snowballing (up to 1 October 2019). Studies conducted in LMIC that reported on shock in children (1 month-18 years) were included. We excluded studies only containing data on neonates, cardiac surgery patients or iatrogenic causes. We presented prevalence data, pooled mortality estimates and conducted subgroup analyses per definition, region and disease. Etiology and pathophysiology data were systematically collected. RESULTS We identified 959 studies and included 59 studies of which six primarily studied shock. Definitions used for shock were classified into five groups. Prevalence of shock ranged from 1.5% in a pediatric hospital population to 44.3% in critically ill children. Pooled mortality estimates ranged between 3.9-33.3% for the five definition groups. Important etiologies included gastroenteritis, sepsis, malaria and severe anemia, which often coincided. The pathophysiology was poorly studied but suggests that in addition to hypovolemia, dissociative and cardiogenic shock are common in LMIC. CONCLUSIONS Shock is associated with high mortality in hospitalized children in LMIC. Despite the importance few studies investigated shock and as a consequence limited data on etiology and pathophysiology of shock is available. A uniform bedside definition may help boost future studies unravelling shock etiology and pathophysiology in LMIC.
Collapse
|
22
|
Resuscitating Children With Sepsis and Impaired Perfusion With Maintenance Fluids: An Evolving Concept. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23:563-565. [PMID: 35797572 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in Malawian children with severe febrile illness and to explore associations between LVSD and mortality and lactate levels. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING Pediatric ward of a tertiary government referral hospital in Malawi. PATIENTS Children between 60 days and 10 years old with severe febrile illness (fever with at least one sign of impaired perfusion plus altered mentation or respiratory distress) were enrolled at admission from October 2017 to February 2018. INTERVENTIONS Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) was performed, and serum lactate was measured for each child at enrollment, with repeat FoCUS the following day. LV systolic function was later categorized as normal, reduced, severely reduced, or hyperdynamic by two pediatric cardiologists blinded to clinical course and outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Fifty-four children were enrolled. LVSD was present in 14 children (25.9%; 95% CI, 15.4-40.3%), of whom three had severely reduced function. Thirty patients (60%) had a lactate greater than 2.5 mmol/L, of which 20 (40%) were markedly elevated (>5 mmol/L). Ten children died during admission (18.5%). Of children who survived, 22.7% had decreased LV systolic function versus 40% of those who died. Dysfunction was not associated with mortality or elevated lactate. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac dysfunction may be present in one in four Malawian children with severe febrile illness, and mortality in these patients is especially high. Larger studies are needed to further clarify the role cardiac dysfunction plays in mortality and integrate practical bedside assessments for decision support around individualized resuscitation strategies.
Collapse
|
24
|
Natraj R, Ranjit S. BESTFIT-T3: A Tiered Monitoring Approach to Persistent/Recurrent Paediatric Septic Shock - A Pilot Conceptual Report. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26:863-870. [PMID: 36864878 PMCID: PMC9973186 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Persistent shock (PS) or recurrent shock (RS) after initial fluids and vasoactives can be secondary to myriad complex mechanisms, and these patients can have a high mortality. We developed a noninvasive tiered hemodynamic monitoring approach which included, in addition to basic echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring and advanced Doppler studies to determine the etiology and provide targeted therapy of PS/RS. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Tertiary Care Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, India. Methods A pilot conceptual report describing the clinical presentation of 10 children with PS/RS using advanced ultrasound and noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. Children with PS/RS after initial fluids and vasoactive agents despite basic echocardiography underwent BESTFIT + T3 (Basic Echocardiography in Shock Therapy for Fluid and Inotrope Titration) with lung ultrasound and advanced 3-tiered monitoring (T1-3). Results Among 10/53 children with septic shock and PS/RS over a 24-month study period, BESTFIT + T3 revealed combinations of right ventricular dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction (DD), altered vascular tone, and venous congestion (VC). By integrating information obtained by BESTFIT + T1-3 and the clinical context, we were able to modify the therapeutic regimen and successfully reverse shock in 8/10 patients. Conclusion We present our pilot results with BESTFIT + T3, a novel approach that can noninvasively interrogate major cardiac, arterial, and venous systems that may be particularly useful in regions where expensive rescue therapies are out of reach. We suggest that, with practice, intensivists already experienced in bedside POCUS can use the information obtained by BESTFIT + T3 to direct time-sensitive precision cardiovascular therapy in persistent/recurrent pediatric septic shock. How to cite this article Natraj R, Ranjit S. BESTFIT-T3: A Tiered Monitoring Approach to Persistent/Recurrent Paediatric Septic Shock - A Pilot Conceptual Report. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(7):863-870.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajeswari Natraj
- Paediatric ICU, Apollo Children’s Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India,Rajeswari Nataraj, Paediatric ICU, Apollo Children’s Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Phone: +91 9884058200, e-mail:
| | - Suchitra Ranjit
- Paediatric ICU, Apollo Children’s Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Meau‐Petit V, Levy Y, Guellec I. Utilisation of neonatologist-performed echocardiography in shock among neonatologists with interest in haemodynamic: International survey. Acta Paediatr 2022; 111:971-978. [PMID: 35138655 DOI: 10.1111/apa.16280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Neonatologist-performed echocardiography (NPE) is recommended during shock. We aimed to assess factors associated with NPE utilisation in the NICU and physiological information obtained during management of shock. METHODS An Internet-based survey, sent to neonatologists with interest in haemodynamics, studying NPE utilisation in shock management through a real clinical case and correlating its use with responders' training and NICU settings. RESULTS Fifty-nine completed surveys were received from the United Kingdom: 38%, Western Europe: 32%, Canada: 23% and other countries: 7%. Whilst managing the given clinical case, 90% of responders expected first NPE to exclude congenital heart disease-although only 61% could exclude it confidently (71% in trained clinicians vs. 29% without training; p < 0.01). NPE utilisation prior to initiate treatment was significantly correlated with mean number of neonatologists able to perform NPE in the NICU (4.9 vs. 2.9 neonatologists per unit; p = 0.02). Similarly, for ongoing therapeutic guidance, NPE was more used in trained clinicians (p < 0.01). 88% and 81% of responders studied a combination of multiple parameters to assess filling and systemic flow, respectively. CONCLUSION Neonatologist-performed echocardiography during shock management differs with previous training and number of doctors able to perform echocardiography in NICU. This study highlighted the need for enhanced training implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Meau‐Petit
- Evelina London Children’s hospital Guy’s and St Thomas’ Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Yael Levy
- Armand Trousseau hospital Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| | - Isabelle Guellec
- Armand Trousseau hospital Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lautz AJ, Wong HR, Ryan TD, Statile CJ. Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model Biomarkers and Estimation of Myocardial Dysfunction in Pediatric Septic Shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23:e20-e28. [PMID: 34560770 PMCID: PMC8738125 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction is common in pediatric septic shock and negatively impacts outcomes. Early estimation of sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction risk has the potential to inform clinical care and improve clinical trial design. The Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model II is validated as a biomarker-based enrichment algorithm to discriminate children with septic shock with high baseline mortality probability. The objectives were to determine if Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model biomarkers are associated with risk for sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction in pediatric septic shock and to develop a biomarker-based model to reliably estimate sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction risk. DESIGN Secondary analysis of prospective cohort study. SETTING Single-center, quaternary-care PICU. PATIENTS Children less than 18 years old admitted to the PICU from 2003 to 2018 who had Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model biomarkers measured for determination of Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model II mortality probability and an echocardiogram performed within 48 hours of septic shock identification. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model II mortality probability was calculated from serum biomarker concentrations and admission platelet count. Echocardiograms were reread by a single cardiologist blinded to Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model II data, and sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% for primary analyses. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association of Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model II mortality probability with sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction. Classification and regression tree methodology was employed to derive a Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model biomarker-based model for sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction. Thirty-two of 181 children with septic shock demonstrated sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction. Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model II mortality probability was independently associated with sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.17-1.81; p = 0.001). Modeling with Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model biomarkers estimated sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction risk with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95). Upon 10-fold cross-validation, the derived model had a summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74. Model characteristics were similar when sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction was defined by both low left ventricular ejection fraction and abnormal global longitudinal strain. CONCLUSIONS A newly derived Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model biomarker-based model reliably estimates risk of sepsis-associated myocardial dysfunction in pediatric septic shock, but independent prospective validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Lautz
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine
| | - Hector R. Wong
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine
| | - Thomas D. Ryan
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Cardiology
| | - Christopher J. Statile
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Cardiology
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yildizdas D, Aslan N. A trend skill that makes pediatric intensivists stand out: Critical care echocardiography. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2021; 24:78-81. [PMID: 34765414 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, the use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) by pediatricians especially in emergency and intensive care departments has become increasingly popular. Critical care echocardiography (CCE) quickly and accurately identifies cardiac function, allowing intensivists to manage critically ill pediatric patients by manipulating vasoactive-inotrope-fluid treatment based on the echocardiographic results. Training courses for POCUS are increasingly available and more intensivists are learning how to use CCE. In this review, we focus on the importance and utility of CCE in pediatric intensive units and how it assists in the management of hemodynamically unstable pediatric patients. We highlight the common measurements carried out by intensive care specialists and emphasize the role of the CCE methods in PICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dincer Yildizdas
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Adana Turkey
| | - Nagehan Aslan
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Adana Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Successful Treatment of Severely Hypotensive Pediatric Patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) with the Guidance of Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring: A Report of Three Cases. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021. [DOI: 10.5812/pedinfect.116282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, it was assumed that infection rate in pediatric patients is lower than in adults and that infection is less severe in children than adult patients. Recently, there have been several reports and case series presenting critically-ill children with COVID-19, but still, severe hypotension is rare in pediatric patients with COVID-19. Case Presentation: We describe three pediatric cases with COVID-19 who presented with multi-system organ failure and severe hypotension treated with the guidance of the parameters of an invasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring device. We also compare their parameters with few articles on pediatric sepsis parameters. Conclusions: Although we usually start the treatment of hypotensive pediatric patients with hydration and epinephrine as an inotrope, in our cases, we required a different treatment plan according to the hemodynamic monitoring parameters, which indicates the value of the utilization of these devices in pediatric intensive care units
Collapse
|
29
|
Watkins LA, Dial SP, Koenig SJ, Kurepa DN, Mayo PH. The Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med 2021; 37:1029-1036. [PMID: 34632837 DOI: 10.1177/08850666211047824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in adult critical care environments has become the standard of care in many hospitals. A robust literature shows its benefits for both diagnosis and delivery of care. The utility of POCUS in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), however, is understudied. This study describes in a series of PICU patients the clinical indications, protocols, findings and impact of pediatric POCUS on clinical management. Design: Retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive POCUS scans performed by a PICU physician. Patients: Pediatric critical care patients who required POCUS scans over a 15-month period. Setting: The pediatric and cardiac ICUs at a tertiary pediatric care center. Interventions: Performance of a POCUS scan by a pediatric critical care attending with advanced training in ultrasonography. Measurement and Main Results: A total of 200 POCUS scans comprised of one or more protocols (lung and pleura, cardiac, abdominal, or vascular diagnostic protocols) were performed on 155 patients over a 15-month period. The protocols used for each scan reflected the clinical question to be answered. These 200 scans included 133 thoracic protocols, 110 cardiac protocols, 77 abdominal protocols, and 4 vascular protocols. In this series, 42% of scans identified pathology that required a change in therapy, 26% confirmed pathology consistent with the ongoing plans for new therapy, and 32% identified pathology that did not result in initiation of a new therapy. Conclusions: POCUS performed by a trained pediatric intensivist provided useful clinical information to guide patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Watkins
- 232890Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- 6923Present Affiliation: University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sharon P Dial
- 232890Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Seth J Koenig
- 2006Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Dalibor N Kurepa
- 232890Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Paul H Mayo
- 232890Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- 5799Northwell LIJ/NSUH Hospital, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T, Atagi K, Inoue S, Iba T, Kakihana Y, Kawasaki T, Kushimoto S, Kuroda Y, Kotani J, Shime N, Taniguchi T, Tsuruta R, Doi K, Doi M, Nakada TA, Nakane M, Fujishima S, Hosokawa N, Masuda Y, Matsushima A, Matsuda N, Yamakawa K, Hara Y, Sakuraya M, Ohshimo S, Aoki Y, Inada M, Umemura Y, Kawai Y, Kondo Y, Saito H, Taito S, Takeda C, Terayama T, Tohira H, Hashimoto H, Hayashida K, Hifumi T, Hirose T, Fukuda T, Fujii T, Miura S, Yasuda H, Abe T, Andoh K, Iida Y, Ishihara T, Ide K, Ito K, Ito Y, Inata Y, Utsunomiya A, Unoki T, Endo K, Ouchi A, Ozaki M, Ono S, Katsura M, Kawaguchi A, Kawamura Y, Kudo D, Kubo K, Kurahashi K, Sakuramoto H, Shimoyama A, Suzuki T, Sekine S, Sekino M, Takahashi N, Takahashi S, Takahashi H, Tagami T, Tajima G, Tatsumi H, Tani M, Tsuchiya A, Tsutsumi Y, Naito T, Nagae M, Nagasawa I, Nakamura K, Nishimura T, Nunomiya S, Norisue Y, Hashimoto S, Hasegawa D, Hatakeyama J, Hara N, Higashibeppu N, Furushima N, Furusono H, Matsuishi Y, Matsuyama T, Minematsu Y, Miyashita R, Miyatake Y, Moriyasu M, Yamada T, Yamada H, Yamamoto R, Yoshida T, Yoshida Y, Yoshimura J, Yotsumoto R, Yonekura H, Wada T, Watanabe E, Aoki M, Asai H, Abe T, Igarashi Y, Iguchi N, Ishikawa M, Ishimaru G, Isokawa S, Itakura R, Imahase H, Imura H, Irinoda T, Uehara K, Ushio N, Umegaki T, Egawa Y, Enomoto Y, Ota K, Ohchi Y, Ohno T, Ohbe H, Oka K, Okada N, Okada Y, Okano H, Okamoto J, Okuda H, Ogura T, Onodera Y, Oyama Y, Kainuma M, Kako E, Kashiura M, Kato H, Kanaya A, Kaneko T, Kanehata K, Kano KI, Kawano H, Kikutani K, Kikuchi H, Kido T, Kimura S, Koami H, Kobashi D, Saiki I, Sakai M, Sakamoto A, Sato T, Shiga Y, Shimoto M, Shimoyama S, Shoko T, Sugawara Y, Sugita A, Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Suhara T, Sonota K, Takauji S, Takashima K, Takahashi S, Takahashi Y, Takeshita J, Tanaka Y, Tampo A, Tsunoyama T, Tetsuhara K, Tokunaga K, Tomioka Y, Tomita K, Tominaga N, Toyosaki M, Toyoda Y, Naito H, Nagata I, Nagato T, Nakamura Y, Nakamori Y, Nahara I, Naraba H, Narita C, Nishioka N, Nishimura T, Nishiyama K, Nomura T, Haga T, Hagiwara Y, Hashimoto K, Hatachi T, Hamasaki T, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Hayamizu A, Haraguchi G, Hirano Y, Fujii R, Fujita M, Fujimura N, Funakoshi H, Horiguchi M, Maki J, Masunaga N, Matsumura Y, Mayumi T, Minami K, Miyazaki Y, Miyamoto K, Murata T, Yanai M, Yano T, Yamada K, Yamada N, Yamamoto T, Yoshihiro S, Tanaka H, Nishida O. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). J Intensive Care 2021; 9:53. [PMID: 34433491 PMCID: PMC8384927 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritoki Egi
- Department of Surgery Related, Division of Anesthesiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunoki-cho 7-5-2, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Ogura
- Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Medical School, Yamadaoka 2-15, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Yatabe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Atagi
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Nara Prefectural General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Inoue
- Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Iba
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kakihana
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kawasaki
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shigeki Kushimoto
- Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kuroda
- Department of Emergency, Disaster, and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Joji Kotani
- Department of Surgery Related, Division of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Shime
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takumi Taniguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Tsuruta
- Acute and General Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
| | - Kent Doi
- Department of Acute Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Matsuyuki Doi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Taka-Aki Nakada
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakane
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Seitaro Fujishima
- Center for General Medicine Education, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Hosokawa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Masuda
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Asako Matsushima
- Department of Advancing Acute Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Matsuda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuma Yamakawa
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Hara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Masaaki Sakuraya
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hatsukaichi, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Ohshimo
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Aoki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Mai Inada
- Member of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Umemura
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kawai
- Department of Nursing, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yutaka Kondo
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Hiroki Saito
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Taito
- Division of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Support and Practice, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Chikashi Takeda
- Department of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takero Terayama
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Hashimoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine/Infectious Disease, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Kei Hayashida
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Toru Hifumi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoya Hirose
- Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tatsuma Fukuda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Tomoko Fujii
- Intensive Care Unit, Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Miura
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hideto Yasuda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Abe
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tsukuba Memorial Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kohkichi Andoh
- Division of Anesthesiology, Division of Intensive Care, Division of Emergency and Critical Care, Sendai City Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yuki Iida
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Toyohashi Sozo University, Toyohashi, Japan
| | - Tadashi Ishihara
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ide
- Critical Care Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenta Ito
- Department of General Pediatrics, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Obu, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ito
- Department of Infectious Disease, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Yu Inata
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Akemi Utsunomiya
- Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Unoki
- Department of Acute and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koji Endo
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akira Ouchi
- College of Nursing, Ibaraki Christian University, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ozaki
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Komaki City Hospital, Komaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ono
- Gastroenterological Center, Shinkuki General Hospital, Kuki, Japan
| | | | | | - Yusuke Kawamura
- Department of Rehabilitation, Showa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kudo
- Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kenji Kubo
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Infectious Diseases, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kiyoyasu Kurahashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Narita, Japan
| | | | - Akira Shimoyama
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Shusuke Sekine
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motohiro Sekino
- Division of Intensive Care, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Nozomi Takahashi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sei Takahashi
- Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CiRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Cardiology, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital, Muroran, Japan
| | - Takashi Tagami
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Goro Tajima
- Nagasaki University Hospital Acute and Critical Care Center, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroomi Tatsumi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masanori Tani
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Asuka Tsuchiya
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsutsumi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takaki Naito
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Masaharu Nagae
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Nakamura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Nishimura
- Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shin Nunomiya
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Norisue
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Satoru Hashimoto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Daisuke Hasegawa
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Junji Hatakeyama
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Hara
- Department of Pharmacy, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Naoki Higashibeppu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Nutrition Support Team, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nana Furushima
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Furusono
- Department of Rehabilitation, University of Tsukuba Hospital/Exult Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yujiro Matsuishi
- Doctoral program in Clinical Sciences. Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tasuku Matsuyama
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Minematsu
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Miyashita
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Miyatake
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Kakogawa, Japan
| | - Megumi Moriyasu
- Division of Respiratory Care and Rapid Response System, Intensive Care Center, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Toru Yamada
- Department of Nursing, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamada
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Yamamoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yoshida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Yuhei Yoshida
- Nursing Department, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jumpei Yoshimura
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Hiroshi Yonekura
- Department of Clinical Anesthesiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Takeshi Wada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Acute and Critical Care Medicine, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Eizo Watanabe
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| | - Makoto Aoki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hideki Asai
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Takakuni Abe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Japan
| | - Yutaka Igarashi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Iguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Masami Ishikawa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kure Kyosai Hospital, Kure, Japan
| | - Go Ishimaru
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Soka Municipal Hospital, Soka, Japan
| | - Shutaro Isokawa
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuta Itakura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Imahase
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Imura
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Kenji Uehara
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital Organization Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan
| | - Noritaka Ushio
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Umegaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Yuko Egawa
- Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuki Enomoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kohei Ota
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Ohchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Japan
| | - Takanori Ohno
- Department of Emergency and Critical Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ohbe
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Nobunaga Okada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yohei Okada
- Department of Primary care and Emergency medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiromu Okano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Okamoto
- Department of ER, Hashimoto Municipal Hospital, Hashimoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Okuda
- Department of Community Medical Supports, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ogura
- Tochigi prefectural Emergency and Critical Care Center, Imperial Gift Foundation Saiseikai, Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Yu Onodera
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yuhta Oyama
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dialysis Center, Kichijoji Asahi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoshi Kainuma
- Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Intensive Care Division, Inazawa Municipal Hospital, Inazawa, Japan
| | - Eisuke Kako
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Nagoya-City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kashiura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiromi Kato
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kanaya
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kaneko
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Keita Kanehata
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Kano
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Onga Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuya Kikutani
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kido
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Sho Kimura
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Koami
- Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Daisuke Kobashi
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Iwao Saiki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahito Sakai
- Department of General Medicine Shintakeo Hospital, Takeo, Japan
| | - Ayaka Sakamoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Sato
- Tohoku University Hospital Emergency Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shiga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Joint Function and Reconstructive Spine Surgery, Graduate school of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Manabu Shimoto
- Department of Primary care and Emergency medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Shimoyama
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Shibukawa, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Shoko
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoh Sugawara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsunori Sugita
- Department of Acute Medicine, Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Suzuki
- Department of Intensive Care, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuji Suzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Suhara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Sonota
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Miyagi Children's Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shuhei Takauji
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Kohei Takashima
- Critical Care Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sho Takahashi
- Department of Cardiology, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan
| | - Yoko Takahashi
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Koga General Hospital, Koga, Japan
| | - Jun Takeshita
- Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Yuuki Tanaka
- Fukuoka Prefectural Psychiatric Center, Dazaifu Hospital, Dazaifu, Japan
| | - Akihito Tampo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Taichiro Tsunoyama
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Tetsuhara
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Tokunaga
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Tomioka
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Todachuo General Hospital, Toda, Japan
| | - Kentaro Tomita
- Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Tominaga
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsunobu Toyosaki
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukitoshi Toyoda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Naito
- Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Isao Nagata
- Intensive Care Unit, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tadashi Nagato
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshimi Nakamura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakamori
- Department of Clinical Anesthesiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Isao Nahara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiromu Naraba
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Chihiro Narita
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Norihiro Nishioka
- Department of Preventive Services, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomoya Nishimura
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Kei Nishiyama
- Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Nomura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taiki Haga
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hagiwara
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Hashimoto
- Research Associate of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Hatachi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Hamasaki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Hayashi
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Minoru Hayashi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Atsuki Hayamizu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Saitama Saiseikai Kurihashi Hospital, Kuki, Japan
| | - Go Haraguchi
- Division of Intensive Care Unit, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Hirano
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Ryo Fujii
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Tochigi Prefectural Emergency and Critical Care Center, Imperial Foundation Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Motoki Fujita
- Acute and General Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Fujimura
- Department of Anesthesiology, St. Mary's Hospital, Our Lady of the Snow Social Medical Corporation, Kurume, Japan
| | - Hiraku Funakoshi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Masahito Horiguchi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jun Maki
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naohisa Masunaga
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Matsumura
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuya Mayumi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa Municipal Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Keisuke Minami
- Ishikawa Prefectual Central Hospital Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yuya Miyazaki
- Department of Emergency and General Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Miyamoto
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teppei Murata
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Machi Yanai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takao Yano
- Department of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Miyazaki Prefectural Nobeoka Hospital, Nobeoka, Japan
| | - Kohei Yamada
- Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Yamada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Tomonori Yamamoto
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Nara Prefectural General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Shodai Yoshihiro
- Pharmaceutical Department, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hatsukaichi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tanaka
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Osamu Nishida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ranjit S, Natraj R, Kissoon N, Thiagarajan RR, Ramakrishnan B, Monge García MI. Variability in the Hemodynamic Response to Fluid Bolus in Pediatric Septic Shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22:e448-e458. [PMID: 33750093 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fluid boluses are commonly administered to improve the cardiac output and tissue oxygen delivery in pediatric septic shock. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of an early fluid bolus administered to children with septic shock on the cardiac index and mean arterial pressure, as well as on the hemodynamic response and its relationship with outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS We prospectively collected hemodynamic data from children with septic shock presenting to the emergency department or the PICU who received a fluid bolus (10 mL/kg of Ringers Lactate over 30 min). A clinically significant response in cardiac index-responder and mean arterial pressure-responder was both defined as an increase of greater than or equal to 10% 10 minutes after fluid bolus. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Forty-two children with septic shock, 1 month to 16 years old, median Pediatric Risk of Mortality-III of 13 (interquartile range, 9-19), of whom 66% were hypotensive and received fluid bolus within the first hour of shock recognition. Cardiac index- and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness rates were 31% and 38%, respectively. We failed to identify any association between cardiac index and mean arterial pressure changes (r = 0.203; p = 0.196). Cardiac function was similar in mean arterial pressure- and cardiac index-responders and nonresponders. Mean arterial pressure-responders increased systolic, diastolic, and perfusion pressures (mean arterial pressure - central venous pressure) after fluid bolus due to higher indexed systemic vascular resistance and arterial elastance index. Mean arterial pressure-nonresponders required greater vasoactive-inotrope support and had higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS The hemodynamic response to fluid bolus in pediatric septic shock was variable and unpredictable. We failed to find a relationship between mean arterial pressure and cardiac index changes. The adverse effects of fluid bolus extended beyond fluid overload and, in some cases, was associated with reduced mean arterial pressure, perfusion pressures and higher vasoactive support. Mean arterial pressure-nonresponders had increased mortality. The response to the initial fluid bolus may be helpful to understand each patient's individualized physiologic response and guide continued hemodynamic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Niranjan Kissoon
- The University of British Columbia, The Child and Family Research Institute, and BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ravi R Thiagarajan
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - M Ignacio Monge García
- Servicio de Cuidados Críticos y Urgencias Hospital SAS de Jerez C/Circunvalación s/n, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Souza DCD, Oliveira CFD, Lanziotti VS. Pediatric sepsis research in low- and middle-income countries: overcoming challenges. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2021; 33:341-345. [PMID: 35107544 PMCID: PMC8555391 DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20210062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Carla de Souza
- Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | | | - Vanessa Soares Lanziotti
- Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Divisão de Pesquisa e Ensino, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Materno-Infantil, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Conlon TW, Kantor DB, Hirshberg EL, Fraga MV, Glau CL, Horowitz R, Burzynski JH, Godshall AJ, Nishisaki A. A Call to Action for the Pediatric Critical Care Community. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22:e410-e414. [PMID: 33653994 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare regulatory bodies have escalated concerns regarding the use of point-of-care ultrasound by nonradiology and noncardiology physicians. A recently published PCCMPerspective identified that data do not support many of these concerns and addressed common misconceptions associated with point-of-care ultrasound use in the critical care setting. Indeed, the global point-of-care ultrasound community and specifically the pediatric critical care community have the opportunity to be leaders in demonstrating how to translate new skills and technologies to the bedside in a safe and effective manner. We seek to extend the conversation and propose next steps in supporting integration of point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric critical care practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W Conlon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David B Kantor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Eliotte L Hirshberg
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Division of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Winnipeg, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, AdventHealth Medical Group, Orlando, FL
| | - Maria V Fraga
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christie L Glau
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Russ Horowitz
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeffrey H Burzynski
- Division of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Winnipeg, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Aaron J Godshall
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, AdventHealth Medical Group, Orlando, FL
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Variability in the Physiologic Response to Fluid Bolus in Pediatric Patients Following Cardiac Surgery. Crit Care Med 2021; 48:e1062-e1070. [PMID: 32947469 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluid boluses aiming to improve the cardiac output and oxygen delivery are commonly administered in children with shock. An increased mean arterial pressure in addition to resolution of tachycardia and improved peripheral perfusion are often monitored as clinical surrogates for improvement in cardiac output. The objective of our study is to describe changes in cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and their relationship to other indices of cardiovascular performance. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study is to describe changes in cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and their relationship to other indices of cardiovascular performance. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS We prospectively analyzed hemodynamic data from children in the cardiac ICU who received fluid bolus (10mL/kg of Ringers-Lactate over 30 min) for management of shock and/or hypoperfusion within 12h of cardiac surgery. Cardiac index responders and mean arterial pressure-responders were defined as CI ≥10% and mean arterial pressure ≥10%, respectively. We evaluated the gradient for venous-return (mean systemic filling pressure-central venous pressure), arterial load properties (systemic vascular resistance index and elastance index) and changes in vasopressor support after fluid bolus. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Fifty-seven children between 1 month and 16 years (median Risk adjustment after congenital heart surgery Model for Outcome Surveillance in Australia and New Zealand score of 3.8 (interquartile range 3.7-4.6) received fluid bolus. Cardiac index-responsiveness and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness rates were 33% and 56%, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between changes in mean arterial pressure and cardiac index (r = 0.035, p = 0.79). Although the mean systemic filling pressure - central venous pressure and the number of cardiac index-responders after fluid bolus were similar, the arterial load parameters did not change in mean arterial pressure-nonresponders. Forty-three patients (75%) had a change in Vasoactive-Inotrope Score after the fluid bolus, of whom 60% received higher level of vasoactive support. CONCLUSIONS The mean arterial pressure response to fluid bolus in cardiac ICU patients was unpredictable with a poor relationship between cardiac index-responsiveness and mean arterial pressure-responsiveness. Because arterial hypotension is frequently a trigger for administering fluids and changes in blood pressure are commonly used for tracking changes in cardiac output, we suggest a cautious and individualized approach to repeat fluid bolus based solely on lack of mean arterial pressure response to the initial fluid, since the implications include decreased arterial tone even if the cardiac index increases.
Collapse
|
35
|
Rao SS, Lalitha AV, Reddy M, Ghosh S. Electrocardiometry for Hemodynamic Categorization and Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Pilot Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25:185-192. [PMID: 33707898 PMCID: PMC7922439 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the utility of noninvasive electrocardiometry (ICON®) for hemodynamic categorization and assessment of fluid responsiveness in pediatric septic shock. Materials and methods Pilot prospective observational study in a 12-bedded tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in children aged between 2 months and 16 years with unresolved septic shock after a 20 mL/kg fluid bolus. Those with cardiac index (CI) <3.3 L/min/m2 and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) >1600 dyn sec/cm5/m2 were classified as vasoconstrictive shock–electrocardiometry (VCEC) and those with CI >5.5 L/min/m2 and SVRI <1000 dyn sec/cm5/m2 as vasodilated shock–electrocardiometry (VDEC). Fluid responsiveness was defined as a 10% increase in CI with a 20 mL/kg fluid bolus. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SMD) was diagnosed on echocardiography. Outcomes studied included clinical shock resolution, length of PICU stay, and mortality. Results Thirty children were enrolled over 6 months with a median (interquartile range) age and pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) III score of 87(21,108) months and 6.75(1.5,8.25), respectively; 14(46.6%) were boys and 4(13.3%) died. Clinically, 19(63.3%) children had cold shock and 11(36.7%) had warm shock; however, 16(53.3%) children had VDEC (including five with clinical cold shock) and 14(46.7%) had VCEC using electrocardiometry. Fluid responsiveness was seen in 16(53.3%) children, 10 in the VCEC group and 6 in the VDEC group. In the VCEC group, the responders had a significant rise in CI and a fall in SVRI, while the responders in the VDEC group had a significant rise in CI and SVRI. Fluid responders, compared to nonresponders, had a significantly higher stroke volume variation (SVV) before fluid bolus (24.1 ± 5.2% vs. 18.2 ± 3.5%, p < 0.001) and a higher reduction in SVV after fluid bolus (10.0 ± 2.8% vs. 6.0 ± 4.5%, p = 0.006), higher lactate clearance (p = 0.03) and lower vasoactive-inotropic score (p = 0.04) at 6 hours, higher percentage of clinical shock resolution at 6 (p = 0.01) and 12 hours (p = 0.01), and lesser mortality (p = 0.002). Five (16.6%) children with VCEC had SMD and were less fluid responsive (p = 0.04) with higher mortality (p = 0.01) compared to those without SMD. Conclusions and clinical significance Continuous, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring using electrocardiometry permits hemodynamic categorization and assessment of fluid responsiveness in pediatric septic shock. This may provide real-time guidance for optimal interventions, and thus, improve the outcomes. How to cite this article Rao SS, Reddy M, Lalitha AV, Ghosh S. Electrocardiometry for Hemodynamic Categorization and Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Pilot Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):185–192.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swathi S Rao
- Department of Pediatrics, KS Hegde Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - A V Lalitha
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, St. John' s Medical College and Hospital, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Mounika Reddy
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, St. John' s Medical College and Hospital, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Santu Ghosh
- Department of Biostatistics, St. John' s Medical College and Hospital, Bangaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess focused cardiac ultrasound impact on clinician hemodynamic characterization of patients with suspected septic shock as well as expert-generated focused cardiac ultrasound algorithm performance. DESIGN Retrospective, observational study. SETTING Single-center, noncardiac PICU. PATIENTS Less than 18 years old receiving focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation from January 2014 to December 2016. INTERVENTIONS Hemodynamics of patients with suspected septic shock were characterized as fluid responsive, myocardial dysfunction, obstructive physiology, and/or reduced systemic vascular resistance by a bedside clinician before and immediately following focused cardiac ultrasound performance. The clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic assessments were compared with an expert-derived focused cardiac ultrasound algorithmic hemodynamic interpretation. Subsequent clinical management was assessed for alignment with focused cardiac ultrasound characterization and association with patient outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Seventy-one patients with suspected septic shock (median, 4.7 yr; interquartile range, 1.6-8.1) received clinician performed focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation (median, 2.1 hr; interquartile range, -1.5 to 11.8 hr). Two patients did not have pre-focused cardiac ultrasound and 23 patients did not have post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization by clinicians resulting in exclusion from related analyses. Post-focused cardiac ultrasound clinician hemodynamic characterization differed from pre-focused cardiac ultrasound characterization in 67% of patients (31/46). There was substantial concordance between clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound and algorithm hemodynamic characterization (33/48; κ = 0.66; CI, 0.51-0.80). Fluid responsive (κ = 0.62; CI, 0.40-0.84), obstructive physiology (к = 0.87; CI, 0.64-1.00), and myocardial dysfunction (1.00; CI, 1.00-1.00) demonstrated substantial to perfect concordance. Management within 4 hours of focused cardiac ultrasound aligned with algorithm characterization in 53 of 71 patients (75%). Patients with aligned management were less likely to have a complicated course (14/52, 27%) compared with misaligned management (8/19, 42%; p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of focused cardiac ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected septic shock frequently changed a clinician's characterization of hemodynamics. An expert-developed algorithm had substantial concordance with a clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization. Management aligned with algorithm characterization may improve outcomes in children with suspected septic shock.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ginsburg S, Conlon T, Himebauch A, Glau C, Weiss S, Weber MD, O'Connor MJ, Nishisaki A. Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Pediatric Sepsis: Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22:275-285. [PMID: 33534389 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is associated with difficulty in ventilator weaning and increased mortality in septic adults. We evaluated the association of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction with outcomes in a cohort of children with severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Single-center noncardiac PICU. PATIENTS Age greater than 1 month to less than 18 years old with severe sepsis or septic shock from January 2011 to June 2017 with echocardiogram within 48 hours of sepsis onset. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Echocardiograms were retrospectively assessed for mitral inflow E (early) and A (atrial) velocity and e' (early mitral annular motion) septal and lateral velocity. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was defined as E/e' greater than 10, E/A less than 0.8, or E/A greater than 1.5. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was present in 109 of 204 patients (53%). The data did not demonstrate an association between the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and the proportion of children requiring invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of echocardiogram (difference in proportion, +5% [72% vs 67%; 95% CI, -8% to 17%]; p = 0.52). The duration of mechanical ventilation was median 192.9 hours (interquartile range, 65.0-378.4 hr) in the left ventricular diastolic dysfunction group versus 151.0 hours (interquartile range, 45.7-244.3 hr) in the group without left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. The presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was not significantly associated with ICU length of stay or mortality. Exploratory analyses revealed that an alternative definition of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, solely defined by E/e' greater than 10, was found to have an association with mechanical ventilation requirement at the time of echocardiogram (difference in proportion, +15%; 95% CI, 3-28%; p = 0.02) and duration of mechanical ventilation (median, 207.3 vs 146.9 hr). CONCLUSIONS The data failed to show an association between the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction defined by both E/e' and E/A and the primary and secondary outcomes. When an alternative definition of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction with E/e' alone was used, there was a significant association with respiratory outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ginsburg
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Thomas Conlon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam Himebauch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christie Glau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Scott Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.,Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Pediatric Sepsis Program, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D Weber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Matthew J O'Connor
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, El-Boghdadly K, Zimmerman J, Silva M, Boretsky K, Chan V, Kruisselbrink R, Byrne M, Hernandez N, Boublik J, Manson WC, Hogg R, Wilkinson JN, Kalagara H, Nejim J, Ramsingh D, Shankar H, Nader A, Souza D, Narouze S. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians-part I: clinical indications. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:1031-1047. [PMID: 33632778 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a critical skill for all regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians to help diagnose relevant complications related to routine practice and guide perioperative management. In an effort to inform the regional anesthesia and pain community as well as address a need for structured education and training, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) commissioned this narrative review to provide recommendations for POCUS. The guidelines were written by content and educational experts and approved by the Guidelines Committee and the Board of Directors of the ASRA. In part I of this two-part series, clinical indications for POCUS in the perioperative and chronic pain setting are described. The clinical review addresses airway ultrasound, lung ultrasound, gastric ultrasound, the focus assessment with sonography for trauma examination and focused cardiac ultrasound for the regional anesthesiologist and pain physician. It also provides foundational knowledge regarding ultrasound physics, discusses the impact of handheld devices and finally, offers insight into the role of POCUS in the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Haskins
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA .,Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yuriy Bronshteyn
- Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anahi Perlas
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Joshua Zimmerman
- Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Marcos Silva
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Boretsky
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vincent Chan
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Melissa Byrne
- Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nadia Hernandez
- Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jan Boublik
- Anesthesiology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - William Clark Manson
- Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rosemary Hogg
- Anaesthesia, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Jonathan N Wilkinson
- Intensive Care and Anaesthesia, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, Northamptonshire, UK
| | | | - Jemiel Nejim
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Davinder Ramsingh
- Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Hariharan Shankar
- Anesthesiology, Clement Zablocki VA Medical Center/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Antoun Nader
- Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dmitri Souza
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gupta D, Dhingra S. Electrocardiometry Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25:123-125. [PMID: 33707887 PMCID: PMC7922445 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring and categorization of patients based on fluid responsiveness is the key to decisions prompting the use of fluids and vasoactive agents in septic shock. Distinguishing patients who are going to benefit from fluids from those who will not is of paramount importance as large amounts of fluids used conventionally based on surviving sepsis guidelines may be detrimental. Noninvasive monitoring techniques for the assessment of various cardiovascular parameters are increasingly accepted as the current medical practice. Electrical cardiometry (EC) is one such method for the determination of stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), and other hemodynamic parameters and is based on changes in electrical conductivity within the thorax. It has been validated against gold standard methods such as thermodilution [Malik V, Subramanian A, Chauhan S, et al. World J 2014;4(7):101-108] and is being used more often as a point-of-care noninvasive technique for hemodynamic monitoring. EC is Food and Drug Administration approved and validated for use in neonates, children, and adults. A meta-analysis in 2016, including 20 studies and 624 patients comparing the accuracy of CO measurement by using EC with other noninvasive technologies, demonstrated that EC was the device that offered the most correct measurements. The article in the current issue of IJCCM by Rao et al. (2020) has extended the use of EC to categorize pediatric patients with septic shock into vasodilated and vasoconstricted states based on systemic vascular resistance and correlate the categorization clinically. The authors also studied the changes in hemodynamic parameters after an isotonic fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg was administered. This is a pilot prospective observational study of 30 patients, which has given an insight into physiological rearrangements following fluid administration in patients with septic shock. How to cite this article: Gupta D, Dhingra. Electrocardiometry Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):123-125.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhiren Gupta
- Division of Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Child Health, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandeep Dhingra
- Department of Pediatrics, Command Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
A new stethoscope for pediatric intensivists: Point-of-care ultrasound. Turk Arch Pediatr 2021; 55:345-353. [PMID: 33414651 PMCID: PMC7750349 DOI: 10.14744/turkpediatriars.2020.12499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the use of point-of-care ultrasound by non-radiologist physicians has become widespread. Especially for clinicians working in pediatric emergency departments and pediatric intensive care units, point-of-care ultrasound has almost become a part of physical examinations due to the rapid responses it offers to the problems of critically ill patients. Numerous studies revealed the important clinical benefits of point-of-care ultrasound use by pediatric intensive care providers. In this review, we aimed to give detailed information about different types of point-of-care ultrasound applications in pediatric intensive care units and wanted to draw attention to the increased use and clinical benefits of this noninvasive and radiation free technique.
Collapse
|
41
|
Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T, Atagi K, Inoue S, Iba T, Kakihana Y, Kawasaki T, Kushimoto S, Kuroda Y, Kotani J, Shime N, Taniguchi T, Tsuruta R, Doi K, Doi M, Nakada T, Nakane M, Fujishima S, Hosokawa N, Masuda Y, Matsushima A, Matsuda N, Yamakawa K, Hara Y, Sakuraya M, Ohshimo S, Aoki Y, Inada M, Umemura Y, Kawai Y, Kondo Y, Saito H, Taito S, Takeda C, Terayama T, Tohira H, Hashimoto H, Hayashida K, Hifumi T, Hirose T, Fukuda T, Fujii T, Miura S, Yasuda H, Abe T, Andoh K, Iida Y, Ishihara T, Ide K, Ito K, Ito Y, Inata Y, Utsunomiya A, Unoki T, Endo K, Ouchi A, Ozaki M, Ono S, Katsura M, Kawaguchi A, Kawamura Y, Kudo D, Kubo K, Kurahashi K, Sakuramoto H, Shimoyama A, Suzuki T, Sekine S, Sekino M, Takahashi N, Takahashi S, Takahashi H, Tagami T, Tajima G, Tatsumi H, Tani M, Tsuchiya A, Tsutsumi Y, Naito T, Nagae M, Nagasawa I, Nakamura K, Nishimura T, Nunomiya S, Norisue Y, Hashimoto S, Hasegawa D, Hatakeyama J, Hara N, Higashibeppu N, Furushima N, Furusono H, Matsuishi Y, Matsuyama T, Minematsu Y, Miyashita R, Miyatake Y, Moriyasu M, Yamada T, Yamada H, Yamamoto R, Yoshida T, Yoshida Y, Yoshimura J, Yotsumoto R, Yonekura H, Wada T, Watanabe E, Aoki M, Asai H, Abe T, Igarashi Y, Iguchi N, Ishikawa M, Ishimaru G, Isokawa S, Itakura R, Imahase H, Imura H, Irinoda T, Uehara K, Ushio N, Umegaki T, Egawa Y, Enomoto Y, Ota K, Ohchi Y, Ohno T, Ohbe H, Oka K, Okada N, Okada Y, Okano H, Okamoto J, Okuda H, Ogura T, Onodera Y, Oyama Y, Kainuma M, Kako E, Kashiura M, Kato H, Kanaya A, Kaneko T, Kanehata K, Kano K, Kawano H, Kikutani K, Kikuchi H, Kido T, Kimura S, Koami H, Kobashi D, Saiki I, Sakai M, Sakamoto A, Sato T, Shiga Y, Shimoto M, Shimoyama S, Shoko T, Sugawara Y, Sugita A, Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Suhara T, Sonota K, Takauji S, Takashima K, Takahashi S, Takahashi Y, Takeshita J, Tanaka Y, Tampo A, Tsunoyama T, Tetsuhara K, Tokunaga K, Tomioka Y, Tomita K, Tominaga N, Toyosaki M, Toyoda Y, Naito H, Nagata I, Nagato T, Nakamura Y, Nakamori Y, Nahara I, Naraba H, Narita C, Nishioka N, Nishimura T, Nishiyama K, Nomura T, Haga T, Hagiwara Y, Hashimoto K, Hatachi T, Hamasaki T, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Hayamizu A, Haraguchi G, Hirano Y, Fujii R, Fujita M, Fujimura N, Funakoshi H, Horiguchi M, Maki J, Masunaga N, Matsumura Y, Mayumi T, Minami K, Miyazaki Y, Miyamoto K, Murata T, Yanai M, Yano T, Yamada K, Yamada N, Yamamoto T, Yoshihiro S, Tanaka H, Nishida O. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). Acute Med Surg 2021; 8:e659. [PMID: 34484801 PMCID: PMC8390911 DOI: 10.1002/ams2.659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.
Collapse
|
42
|
Clinical Signs to Categorize Shock and Target Vasoactive Medications in Warm Versus Cold Pediatric Septic Shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:1051-1058. [PMID: 32740190 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Determine level of agreement among clinical signs of shock type, identify which signs clinicians prioritize to determine shock type and select vasoactive medications, and test the association of shock type-vasoactive mismatch with prolonged organ dysfunction or death (complicated course). DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING Single large academic PICU. PATIENTS Patients less than 18 years treated on a critical care sepsis pathway between 2012 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Agreement among clinical signs (extremity temperature, capillary refill, pulse strength, pulse pressure, and diastolic blood pressure) was measured using Fleiss and Cohen's κ. Association of clinical signs with shock type and shock type-vasoactive mismatch (e.g., cold shock treated with vasopressor rather than inotrope) with complicated course was determined using multivariable logistic regression. Of 469 patients, clinicians determined 307 (65%) had warm and 162 (35%) had cold shock. Agreement across all clinical signs was low (κ, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20-0.30), although agreement between extremity temperature, capillary refill, and pulse strength was better than with pulse pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Only extremity temperature (adjusted odds ratio, 26.6; 95% CI, 15.5-45.8), capillary refill (adjusted odds ratio, 15.7; 95% CI, 7.9-31.3), and pulse strength (adjusted odds ratio, 21.3; 95% CI, 8.6-52.7) were associated with clinician-documented shock type. Of the 86 patients initiated on vasoactive medications during the pathway, shock type was discordant from vasoactive medication (κ, 0.14; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.31) and shock type-vasoactive mismatch was not associated with complicated course (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-1.02). CONCLUSIONS Agreement was low among common clinical signs used to characterize shock type, with clinicians prioritizing extremity temperature, capillary refill, and pulse strength. Although clinician-assigned shock type was often discordant with vasoactive choice, shock type-vasoactive mismatch was not associated with complicated course. Categorizing shock based on clinical signs should be done cautiously.
Collapse
|
43
|
Perspective of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the Management of Pediatric Sepsis in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:e1031-e1037. [PMID: 32886460 PMCID: PMC7597755 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a novel cause of organ dysfunction in children, presenting as either coronavirus disease 2019 with sepsis and/or respiratory failure or a hyperinflammatory shock syndrome. Clinicians must now consider these diagnoses when evaluating children for septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-associated Organ Dysfunction in Children provide an appropriate framework for the early recognition and initial resuscitation of children with sepsis or septic shock caused by all pathogens, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, the potential benefits of select adjunctive therapies may differ from non-coronavirus disease 2019 sepsis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesia: perioperative considerations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:343-353. [PMID: 32324662 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the perioperative applications of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). RECENT FINDINGS The role of point-of-care ultrasonography for perioperative care is expanding with respect to perioperative application. The imaging approach can complement the physical exam and provide additional information for decision-making in pediatric perioperative medicine. This review will focus on applications in the following organ systems: airway, cardiac, pulmonary and gastric. Specifically, POCUS of the airway has been used to optimize endotracheal tube depth, aid in tube size selection and predict difficulty with laryngoscopy and intubation. Lung POCUS has been used to assess for causes hypoxemia as well as to optimize ventilatory mechanics. Cardiac POCUS has been used for assessment of hemodynamics, valvular and ventricular function. Gastric ultrasound has emerged as an evaluative mechanism of gastric content in the setting of fasting as well as to confirm placement of gastric tubes. The applications of POCUS in the perioperative setting continue to evolve as a reliable diagnostic tool that can assist in timely diagnosis, improve procedural safety and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. SUMMARY The utility of perioperative POCUS has been well demonstrated, specifically for examination of the airway, stomach and cardiopulmonary system. It is advisable for the novice sonographer to perform POCUS within the guidelines set by the American Society of Echocardiography regarding basic POCUS. As with all diagnostic modalities, understanding the limitations of ultrasound and POCUS as well as continuous self-assessment is crucial.
Collapse
|
45
|
Garcia PCR, Tonial CT, Piva JP. Septic shock in pediatrics: the state‐of‐the‐art. JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA (VERSÃO EM PORTUGUÊS) 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedp.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
46
|
Garcia PCR, Tonial CT, Piva JP. Septic shock in pediatrics: the state-of-the-art. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2020; 96 Suppl 1:87-98. [PMID: 31843507 PMCID: PMC9432279 DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Review the main aspects of the definition, diagnosis, and management of pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock. SOURCE OF DATA A search was carried out in the MEDLINE and Embase databases. The articles were chosen according to the authors' interest, prioritizing those published in the last five years. SYNTHESIS OF DATA Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality in pediatric patients. The variability of clinical presentations makes it difficult to attain a precise definition in pediatrics. Airway stabilization with adequate oxygenation and ventilation if necessary, initial volume resuscitation, antibiotic administration, and cardiovascular support are the basis of sepsis treatment. In resource-poor settings, attention should be paid to the risks of fluid overload when administrating fluids. Administration of vasoactive drugs such as epinephrine or norepinephrine is necessary in the absence of volume response within the first hour. Follow-up of shock treatment should adhere to targets such as restoring vital and clinical signs of shock and controlling the focus of infection. A multimodal evaluation with bedside ultrasound for management after the first hours is recommended. In refractory shock, attention should be given to situations such as cardiac tamponade, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, abdominal catastrophe, and focus of uncontrolled infection. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of protocols and advanced technologies have reduced sepsis mortality. In resource-poor settings, good practices such as early sepsis identification, antibiotic administration, and careful fluid infusion are the cornerstones of sepsis management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Celiny Ramos Garcia
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Hospital São Lucas, Faculdade de Medicina e Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pediatria e Saúde Infantil, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Cristian Tedesco Tonial
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Hospital São Lucas, Faculdade de Medicina e Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
| | - Jefferson Pedro Piva
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Departamento de Emergência e Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis and septic shock in children results in improved outcomes. However, diagnosis is hampered by lack of specific diagnostic tests and relies on the recognition of the alterations of vital signs and protean systemic manifestations associated with infections, signs that mimic many critical illnesses. As a result, the early diagnosis of sepsis is usually presumptive and is based on the suspicion or presence of an infection in combination with the systemic changes. Suspicion should be heightened in vulnerable risk groups such as those with immune compromise due to underlying disease or medication use. Thus, on many occasions, treatment of sepsis is initiated on clinical suspicion pending the outcomes of ongoing evaluations and laboratory findings.What is of relevance to the emergency clinicians is the initial recognition, resuscitation, and treatment in the first few hours of presentation. To best accomplish these tasks, contemporary guidelines suggest that the use of a "recognition bundle" containing a trigger tool for rapid identification, a "resuscitation and stabilization bundle" to enable adherence to best practice, and a "performance bundle" to identify and overcome barriers to best practice be used.Although there are no universally acceptable tools to accomplish these tasks, the various iterations used in quality improvement initiatives have consistently demonstrated better care processes and outcomes. In this article, we outline the contemporary approach to sepsis in the first hours after presentation.
Collapse
|
48
|
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Møller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:10-67. [PMID: 32030529 PMCID: PMC7095013 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 275] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 49 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 52 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S D Agus
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert C Tasker
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew C Argent
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Choong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffry J Cies
- St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Daniele De Luca
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | | | - Saul N Faust
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Poonam Joshi
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Oliver Karam
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Joris Lemson
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilesh M Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Akira Nishisaki
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark E Nunnally
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Raina M Paul
- Advocate Children's Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Adrienne G Randolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Judy T Verger
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Joshua Wolf
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Pierre Tissieres
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell-CNRS, CEA, Univ Paris Sud, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Møller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:e52-e106. [PMID: 32032273 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 478] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 52 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 49 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S D Agus
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert C Tasker
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew C Argent
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Choong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffry J Cies
- St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Daniele De Luca
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Akash Deep
- King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saul N Faust
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Poonam Joshi
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Oliver Karam
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA
| | | | - Joris Lemson
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- National University Health System, Singapore, and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilesh M Mehta
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Akira Nishisaki
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Adrienne G Randolph
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Lyvonne N Tume
- University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Judy T Verger
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Joshua Wolf
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | - Niranjan Kissoon
- British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pierre Tissieres
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell-CNRS, CEA, Univ Paris Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Weiss SL, Nicolson SC, Naim MY. Clinical Update in Pediatric Sepsis: Focus on Children With Pre-Existing Heart Disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 34:1324-1332. [PMID: 31734080 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
SEPSIS REMAINS one of the most common causes of childhood morbidity, mortality, and higher healthcare costs, with over 75,000 hospital admissions in the United States and an estimated 4 million cases worldwide per year. While standardized criteria to define sepsis are in flux, the general concept of sepsis is a severe infection that results in organ dysfunction. Although sepsis can affect previously healthy children, those with certain pre-existing comorbid conditions, including congenital and acquired heart disease, are at higher risk for both developing sepsis and having a poor outcome after sepsis. Multiple specialists including intensivists, cardiologists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists commonly contribute to the management and outcome of sepsis in children. In this article, the authors examine the evolving epidemiology of pediatric sepsis, including the subset of patients with underlying heart disease; contrast pediatric and adult sepsis; review the latest hemodynamic guidelines for management of pediatric septic shock and their application to children with heart disease; discuss the role of mechanical circulatory support; and review key aspects of anesthetic management for children with sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Mitochondrial and Epigenomic Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Pediatric Sepsis Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Susan C Nicolson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Cardiac Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Maryam Y Naim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Cardiac Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|