1
|
Berger LE, Song DH. Discussion: Replacement of Shaped Textured Implants with Round Smooth Implants in Breast Reconstruction: Long-Term Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154:272-274. [PMID: 39046836 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000011413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Berger
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plotsker EL, Stern CS, Graziano FD, Rubenstein RN, Vingan PS, Haglich K, Monge J, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Dayan JH, Allen R, Matros E, McCarthy C, Nelson JA. Surgical Management of Textured Breast Implants: Assessing Risk and Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154:39-52. [PMID: 37535711 PMCID: PMC10837321 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textured implants have been linked to breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Patients who undergo explantation have options for reconstruction, but data on safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are limited. The purpose of this study was to classify complications and PROs in patients opting for surgical management of textured implants. METHODS Complication rates and BREAST-Q scores were compared between (1) asymptomatic patients who underwent conversion from textured to smooth implants ( n = 224), (2) symptomatic patients who underwent conversion from textured to smooth implants ( n = 83), (3) patients who underwent explantation without replacement ( n = 44), and (4) patients who underwent replacement with autologous reconstruction ( n = 33). Linear regression examined PROs controlling for clinical and surgical variables. RESULTS Overall complication rates in 384 patients (637 implants) differed across groups ( P = 0.034), with the highest rate (25%) in patients who underwent explantation without replacement. These patients were specifically more impacted by minor complications, notably seroma. Capsulectomy extent did not significantly impact complications. Asymptomatic and symptomatic smooth implant patients had improvements in Satisfaction with Breasts ( P < 0.05). Autologous reconstruction patients had significant improvements in Satisfaction with Breasts sustained after 3 months postoperatively ( P < 0.01) and Sexual Well-being sustained after 6-months postoperatively ( P < 0.05). Patients who underwent removal without replacement had lower Physical Well-being of the Chest scores at 1 year or more than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS Replacement of textured implants with smooth implants or flaps is safe and is associated with improved satisfaction with breasts and quality of life. The degree of capsulectomy does not appear to impact the incidence of perioperative complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francis D. Graziano
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Robyn N. Rubenstein
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Perri S. Vingan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Kathryn Haglich
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Jasmine Monge
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Joseph J. Disa
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Babak J. Mehrara
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Joseph H. Dayan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Robert Allen
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Evan Matros
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rossi M, Cammarata E, Cipolla C, Vieni S, Toia F, Cordova A. The "Octopus Head" Dermoglandular Flap: A Novel Technique for Breast Tissue Rearranging after Implant Removal. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5882. [PMID: 38868620 PMCID: PMC11167231 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Patients with previous breast augmentation may need implant removal for mechanical complications or other causes. After prosthesis removal, the residual parenchyma can be reshaped through a mastopexy with rearrangement of breast tissue. Several techniques have been described in the literature, but none of them can be considered the gold standard. In this study, we present our preliminary experience in breast tissue rearranging after implant removal through a novel technique: the "octopus head" dermoglandular flap. Methods From January 2019 to October 2022, nine patients (18 breasts) underwent implant removal and simultaneous breast remodeling with the tissue obtained from the dermoglandular excess of the breast and shaped like an octopus head. Patient's demographic and clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, and patient-reported satisfaction were recorded. Results Mean age was 46.7 years. Body mass index ranged between 22.5 and 27.6 kg per m2. The majority of patients had moderate ptosis (67%). Breast implants were removed due to bilateral capsular contracture (n = 3), unilateral implant rupture with contralateral capsular contracture (n = 2), bilateral implant rupture (n = 3), and unilateral periprosthetic seroma (n = 1). We observed two minor complications: one postoperative hemorrhage with subsequent hematoma that was managed conservatively, and one nipple-areola complex malposition that underwent revision surgery. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional result. Conclusions The octopus head dermoglandular flap has proved to be a safe and reliable option for breast tissue rearranging after implant removal, providing a good and stable cosmetic result, a low complication rate, and high patient-reported satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Rossi
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.)., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Emanuele Cammarata
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.)., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Calogero Cipolla
- Oncological Surgery Unit, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.)., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Vieni
- Oncological Surgery Unit, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.)., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesca Toia
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.)., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Adriana Cordova
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.)., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Innocenti A, Melita D. Tuberous Breast: A Wide Spectrum of Features of the Same Disorder-13-Year Experience-Based Classification and Reconstructive Algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:1231-1238. [PMID: 37335572 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multitude of variants of tuberous breast exist, and a reconstructive algorithm could help in assessment of all features that affect the breast and planning the most appropriate surgical correction strategy. Although several efficient techniques have been described in the literature, the authors propose their experience to help standardize a diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The aim of this article is to assess the pathologic hallmarks of each type of tuberous breast and to propose a one-step reconstructive algorithm tailored to the patient characteristics based on the use of three different adipo-glandular flaps. METHODS From September of 2006 to December of 2019, 118 patients were treated for tuberous breast in a one-step procedure using tailored local flaps according to the preoperatively assessed clinical variant. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. All the procedures were performed under local anesthesia. RESULTS A total of 220 tuberous breasts (98 hypoplastic and 122 normoplastic) were treated. Mean patient age was 20.2 years. Mean follow-up was 36.5 months. Six minor complications (capsular contracture and nipple-areola complex hypesthesia) but no major complications were reported. In 9% of cases, minor secondary procedures, including lipofilling, scar revisions, and breast implant substitution, were performed. CONCLUSION The proposed algorithm, including a comprehensive classification, preoperative planning, and surgical approach derived from the authors' experience, presents a tailored surgical approach for each type of tuberous breast. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Melita
- From Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Park-Simon TW, Müller V, Albert US, Banys Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wuerstlein R, Wöckel A, Janni W, Thill M. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2024. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:165-182. [PMID: 38894952 PMCID: PMC11182637 DOI: 10.1159/000538596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Each year the interdisciplinary AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, German Gynecological Oncology Group) Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Methods The updated evidence-based treatment recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer have been released in March 2024. Results and Conclusion This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik und Brustzentrum Klinikum Landshut, AdöR, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva M. Fallenberg
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine & Health, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, CIO ABCD, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, BZKF, LMU University Hospital Munich and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Daniel Hartkopf
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth und Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Filderklinik, Filderstadt, Brustzentrum und Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Frauenheilkunde/Brustzentrum Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz (Buckow) and Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Rüdersdorf), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen und CIO ABCD, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, BZKF, LMU University Hospital Munich and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Forschungsinstitut für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim M, Vorstenbosch J, Ghione P, Plitas G, Horwitz S, Cordeiro P, Nelson JA, McCarthy C. ASO Author Reflections: Approaching BIA-ACL Diagnosis and Treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2789-2790. [PMID: 38324236 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14930-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Kim
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paola Ghione
- Hematology and Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - George Plitas
- Breast Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven Horwitz
- Hematology and Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Cordeiro
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Colleen McCarthy
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fijany AJ, Chaker SC, Hung YC, Zago I, Friedlich N, Olsson SE, Holan CA, Montorfano L, Mubang RN, Givechian KB, Boctor MJ, Pekarev M, Martinez-Jorge J, Slater ED. Complication Profiles of Smooth vs Textured Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44:383-393. [PMID: 37757895 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma first linked with breast implants in 2011. The correlation between BIA-ALCL and textured devices has led to increased use of smooth devices. However, much of the data surrounding smooth and textured devices investigates breast implants specifically and not tissue expanders. OBJECTIVES We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes for smooth tissue expanders (STEs) and textured tissue expanders (TTEs). METHODS A search was performed on PubMed, including articles from 2016 to 2023 (n = 419). Studies comparing TTEs and STEs and reported complications were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days.Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Overall, STEs and TTEs had similar complication profiles. However, STEs had 1.5 times higher odds of explantation. The incidence of BIA-ALCL is low, and only a single case of BIA-ALCL has been reported with TTEs. This indicates that TTEs are safe and may lower the risk of early complications requiring explantation. Further studies are warranted to further define the relationship between tissue expanders and BIA-ALCL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
8
|
Camicia A, Foppiani JA, Raska O, Hernandez Alvarez A, Lee D, Taritsa IC, Schuster KA, Wan R, Neradová S, Lin GJ, Lee TC, Molitor M, Zikan M, Lin SJ. From Case Reports to Molecular Insight: Examining the Outcomes and Underlying Mechanisms of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Breast Implant Patients-A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2872. [PMID: 38474119 PMCID: PMC10932080 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
There is extensive coverage in the existing literature on implant-associated lymphomas like anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, but breast implant-associated squamous cell carcinoma (BIA-SCC) has received limited scholarly attention since its first case in 1992. Thus, this study aims to conduct a qualitative synthesis focused on the underexplored association between breast implants and BIA-SCC. A systematic review was conducted utilizing the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify all currently reported cases of BIA-SCC. Additionally, a literature review was performed to identify potential biochemical mechanisms that could lead to BIA-SCC. Studies were vetted for quality using the NIH quality assessment tool. From an initial pool of 246 papers, 11 met the quality criteria for inclusion, examining a total of 14 patients aged between 40 and 81 years. BIA-SCC was found in a diverse range of implants, including those with smooth and textured surfaces, as well as those filled with saline and silicone. The condition notably manifested a proclivity for aggressive clinical progression, as evidenced by a mortality rate approximating 21.4% within a post-diagnostic interval of six months. Our literature review reveals that chronic inflammation, driven by various external factors such as pathogens and implants, can initiate carcinogenesis through epigenetic modifications and immune system alterations. This includes effects from exosomes and macrophage polarization, showcasing potential pathways for the pathogenesis of BIA-SCC. The study highlights the pressing need for further investigation into BIA-SCC, a subject hitherto inadequately addressed in the academic sphere. This necessitates the urgency for early screening and intervention to improve postoperative outcomes. While the review is confined by its reliance on case reports and series, it serves as a valuable reference for future research endeavors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Camicia
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy;
| | - Jose A. Foppiani
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (J.A.F.); (A.H.A.); (D.L.); (I.C.T.); (K.A.S.); (S.J.L.)
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12108 Praha, Czech Republic; (S.N.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Otakar Raska
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12108 Praha, Czech Republic; (S.N.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Angelica Hernandez Alvarez
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (J.A.F.); (A.H.A.); (D.L.); (I.C.T.); (K.A.S.); (S.J.L.)
| | - Daniela Lee
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (J.A.F.); (A.H.A.); (D.L.); (I.C.T.); (K.A.S.); (S.J.L.)
| | - Iulianna C. Taritsa
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (J.A.F.); (A.H.A.); (D.L.); (I.C.T.); (K.A.S.); (S.J.L.)
| | - Kirsten A. Schuster
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (J.A.F.); (A.H.A.); (D.L.); (I.C.T.); (K.A.S.); (S.J.L.)
| | - Rou Wan
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA;
| | - Sylva Neradová
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12108 Praha, Czech Republic; (S.N.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Gavin J. Lin
- Nobles and Greenough School, Dedham, MA 02026, USA
| | | | - Martin Molitor
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12108 Praha, Czech Republic; (S.N.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Bulovka University Hospital, 46401 Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Zikan
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12108 Praha, Czech Republic; (S.N.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bulovka University Hospital, 46401 Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Samuel J. Lin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (J.A.F.); (A.H.A.); (D.L.); (I.C.T.); (K.A.S.); (S.J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dahmus ES, Ruffino AE, Madera JD, Long A, Wang S, Kauffman CA, Devitt S, Sanders C, DeSantis J. Smooth vs Textured Expanders: Patient Factors and Anatomic Plane Are Greater Factors in Determining First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44:NP159-NP167. [PMID: 37706322 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textured implants and expanders are associated with an increased risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). As a result, plastic surgeons are utilizing smooth expanders, but many perceive these produce undesirable outcomes including infection, seroma, and lateral displacement. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of smooth and textured expanders. METHODS Breast reconstruction patients from January 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Included patients underwent placement of tissue expanders at the time of mastectomy. Primary outcomes included postoperative seroma, infection, malposition, days to final reconstruction, explantation, and the need for capsulorrhaphy. RESULTS In total, 233 patients were reviewed, of whom 167 met both inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in poor outcomes comparing smooth and textured expanders. Days to final reconstruction was lower with smooth expanders per breast (P = .0424). The subpectoral group was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing capsulorrhaphy (P = .004). Prepectoral placement was associated with more seromas (P = .0176) and infections (P = .0245). Demographic factors included older age as a protective factor for undergoing capsulorrhaphy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.962, P = .038), obesity increased the risk of infection (OR = 5.683, P = .0279) and malposition (OR = 6.208, P = .0222), and radiation was associated with malposition (OR = 3.408, P = .0246). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in poor outcomes between smooth and textured expanders. Patient demographics and anatomical plane placement had greater effects on infection, seroma, and the need for capsulorrhaphy compared with tissue expander texturing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
|
10
|
Eijsink E, Harmeling J, Mureau M, Corten E. Decision making in breast implant selection for breast reconstruction: A mixed-method study among plastic surgeons. JPRAS Open 2023; 38:283-295. [PMID: 38021320 PMCID: PMC10663762 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast implants and the (dis)advantages of their characteristics (shape, filling, surface, and brand) have been studied extensively. When selecting a specific breast implant, a plastic surgeon makes a trade-off between the various (dis)advantages. However, the factors affecting the choice of their preferred breast implant have not been studied in detail. Methods This is a mixed-method study. First, five plastic surgeons were interviewed to identify factors that influence their choice of a breast implant in a reconstructive setting. Second, 42 plastic surgeons were asked to state their preferred implant, weigh the collected factors, and indicate when they would deviate from their preferred implant. Results The interviews produced a varied list of factors that influenced the choice of breast implant, including complication rates, marketing, economic, and logistic factors. The results from the survey showed variation in preferred implant and substantial variations in the weighing of these factors. The two most important factors were "study outcomes" and "brand reputation". Ninety percent of the respondents were willing to deviate from their preferred implant, with the patient's preference being the main indication to deviate. Conclusions The list of factors that influence the plastic surgeons' choice of a breast implant in a reconstructive setting is extensive and their weighing showed substantial variation. Implant choice was not based solely on scientific evidence. Brand reputation was valued highly, implying that media and marketing may have considerable influence. Therefore, patients must be informed extensively about all aspects of breast implants during shared decision making to obtain true informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - M.A.M. Mureau
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E.M.L. Corten
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McGuire PA, Glicksman C, McCarthy C, Spiegel A. Separating Myth from Reality in Breast Implants: An Overview of 30 Years of Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:801e-807e. [PMID: 37010472 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY The purpose of this article is to review the pivotal events in the history of breast implants in the United States, including the events leading to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration moratorium on the use of silicone gel implants and subsequent approval; the emergence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL); and persistent concerns about an association between breast implants, autoimmune disease, and systemic symptoms. This article reviews the medical literature to outline our current knowledge on BIA-ALCL; offers recommendations for diagnosis and management of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with textured implants; and reviews the science of potential associations of implants with autoimmune and systemic symptoms. The authors hope to help patients separate myths from reality and make educated decisions on having breast implants placed or removed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Colleen McCarthy
- the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Aldona Spiegel
- The Center for Breast Restoration, Weill Cornell Medical School, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, and Division of Surgical Innovation, Houston Methodist Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mason MM, Kuruoglu D, Zheng EE, Kerivan LT, Nguyen MDT. Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Awareness: An Analysis of the Responses to an Institutional Campaign and Global Recall. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 91:529-533. [PMID: 37823619 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed an assessment of patient response rates and clinical outcomes to the global recall for textured breast implants and to our institution's letters informing them of their risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). METHODS A retrospective review of patients who had textured implants placed at our institution was completed. Outcome measures included patient response rates to either the global recall or our institution's letters, rate of textured implant removal, and type of subsequent revision surgery. RESULTS A total of 1176 patients with textured implants were reviewed for this study. In total, 374 patients (31.8%) reached out to discuss their risk of BIA-ALCL, and 297 (25.3%) eventually presented to the clinic. One hundred twenty eight patients (34.2%) responded after the letter but before the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban of macrotextured BIOCELL implants, 186 (49.7%) after the FDA ban, and 48 (12.8%) after the manufacturer's multichannel campaign. One hundred eighteen patients with textured implants (11.6%) proceeded with surgery. Most underwent exchange with smooth implants (76 patients [64.4%]) after textured implant removal. CONCLUSIONS A significant portion of patients (31.8%) responded to our letters, the FDA ban, and the manufacturer's campaign. Despite the low incidence of BIA-ALCL and the ongoing recommendation for observation in the setting of no symptoms, 11.6% of our patients still elected to proceed with implant removal. Exchange to smooth implants was the most popular surgical option at 64.4%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Doga Kuruoglu
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Eugene E Zheng
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Moraes FCA, Dal Moro L, Pessoa FR, Passos ESDR, Campos RALS, de Souza DDSM, Feio D, Rodríguez Burbano RM, Fernandes MR, dos Santos NPC. Malignant Neoplasms Arising in the Cardiac Pacemaker Cavity: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5206. [PMID: 37958380 PMCID: PMC10647525 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the abnormal proliferation of physiologically inadequate cells. Studies have identified the cardiac pacemaker pocket as a site of rare neoplasms. To evaluate the clinical outcomes, treatment, prognosis, and individualized management of tumors originating in the cardiac pacemaker pocket, a systematic review was conducted using case reports and case series available in the PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, LILACS, and Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo) databases. Pacemaker pocket tumors affected patients with a mean age of 72.9 years, with a higher incidence in males (76.9%, n = 10). The average time for neoplasm development was 4.4 years (54.07 months). The most prevalent model was Medtronic (38.4%, n = 5), with titanium (83.3%) being the most common metal composition. Chemotherapy was the most performed procedure among patients (38.4%), followed by radiation therapy (38.4%) and surgical tumor resection (30.7%). Six analyzed cases (46.1%) resulted in death, and four patients (30.7%) achieved a cure. Patients with pacemakers should be routinely evaluated for the occurrence of malignant tumors at the site of device implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes
- Oncology Research Center, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (D.F.); (M.R.F.); (N.P.C.d.S.)
| | - Lucca Dal Moro
- Department of Medicine, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil; (L.D.M.); (F.R.P.); (E.S.d.R.P.); (R.A.L.S.C.); (D.d.S.M.d.S.)
| | - Fernando Rocha Pessoa
- Department of Medicine, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil; (L.D.M.); (F.R.P.); (E.S.d.R.P.); (R.A.L.S.C.); (D.d.S.M.d.S.)
| | - Ellen Sabrinna dos Remédios Passos
- Department of Medicine, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil; (L.D.M.); (F.R.P.); (E.S.d.R.P.); (R.A.L.S.C.); (D.d.S.M.d.S.)
| | - Raul Antônio Lopes Silva Campos
- Department of Medicine, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil; (L.D.M.); (F.R.P.); (E.S.d.R.P.); (R.A.L.S.C.); (D.d.S.M.d.S.)
| | - Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza
- Department of Medicine, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil; (L.D.M.); (F.R.P.); (E.S.d.R.P.); (R.A.L.S.C.); (D.d.S.M.d.S.)
- Gaspar Vianna State Public Hospital of Clinical Foundation, Belém 66083-106, PA, Brazil
| | - Danielle Feio
- Oncology Research Center, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (D.F.); (M.R.F.); (N.P.C.d.S.)
| | | | - Marianne Rodrigues Fernandes
- Oncology Research Center, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (D.F.); (M.R.F.); (N.P.C.d.S.)
| | - Ney Pereira Carneiro dos Santos
- Oncology Research Center, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil; (D.F.); (M.R.F.); (N.P.C.d.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park-Simon TW, Müller V, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Wuerstlein R, Janni W, Thill M. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:289-305. [PMID: 37900552 PMCID: PMC10601667 DOI: 10.1159/000531578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Summary The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023. Key Messages This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth und Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz (Buckow) & Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf/Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Rüdersdorf), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roider LA, Nguyen DC, Pusapadi Ramkumar S, Tyson CV, Lund HG, Plikaitis CM. Practice Trends in the Management of Asymptomatic Breast Reconstruction Patients with Textured Implants: A Survey Analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5139. [PMID: 37465286 PMCID: PMC10351951 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Despite the increasing prevalence of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, there remains a paucity of literature guiding management of asymptomatic patients with textured breast implants. This risk can be anxiety provoking in breast reconstruction patients given their history of cancer or increased future risk. The purpose of this study is to evaluate current practice trends when managing the concerned asymptomatic patient following textured implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods An electronic survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, regarding management of asymptomatic breast reconstruction patients with textured devices. Anonymous responses were collected, and statistical analysis was performed. Results A total of 304 responses were received. Of respondents, 237 (92%) have managed asymptomatic patients with textured devices. Historically, the overwhelming majority (89%) used textured devices; however, only 25% report current use. Regarding management of asymptomatic breast reconstruction patients, 87% recommend conservative management, while 13% recommend surgical management. When surgery is performed, 16.3% of respondents elected for implant exchange, 33.8% recommended implant exchange with partial capsulectomy, and 49.8% elected for implant exchange with total capsulectomy. Evaluation of practice patterns based on demographics demonstrated statistically significant differences in current use of textured devices and management of acellular dermal matrix. Conclusions Despite decreased current use, there is a significant population of asymptomatic breast reconstruction patients with a history of textured devices concerned for risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. This survey demonstrates ongoing variability in surgeon recommendations regarding conservative and surgical management of these patients and the need for continued development of evidence-based guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Roider
- From the Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo
| | - David C Nguyen
- From the Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo
| | - Shreya Pusapadi Ramkumar
- From the Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo
| | - Cody V Tyson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala
| | | | - Christina M Plikaitis
- From the Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Clegg DJ, Salomon BJ, Porter CG, Mazonas TW, Heidel RE, Stephenson SM, Herbig KS, Chun JT, Lloyd JM, Boukovalas S. The Impact of Prior Breast Augmentation on Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5025. [PMID: 37360240 PMCID: PMC10287142 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
The risk of women developing breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty may be lower than the general population, with minimal current literature on breast reconstruction in this population. We sought to evaluate the impact of previous augmentation on postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Methods Retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomies from 2017 to 2021 at our institution was performed. Analysis included frequencies and percentages, descriptive statistics, chi-square analysis, and Fisher exact test. Results Four hundred seventy patients were included, with average body mass index of 29.1 kg/m2, 96% identifying as White, and an average age at diagnosis of 59.3 years. Twenty (4.2%) patients had a prior breast augmentation. Reconstruction was performed in 80% of the previously augmented patients compared to 49.9% of nonaugmented patients (P = 0.01). Reconstruction was alloplastic in 100% of augmented and 88.7% of nonaugmented patients (P = 0.15). All reconstructed augmented patients underwent immediate reconstruction compared with 90.5% of nonaugmented patients (P = 0.37), and two-stage reconstruction was most common (75.0% versus 63.5%; P = 0.42). Of the previously augmented patients, 87.5% increased implant volume, 75% underwent same implant plane reconstruction, and 68.75% underwent same implant-type reconstruction as their augmentation. Conclusions Previously augmented patients were more likely to undergo reconstruction after mastectomy at our institution. All reconstructed augmented patients underwent alloplastic reconstruction, with most performed immediately in staged fashion. Most patients favored silicone implants and maintained the same implant type and plane of reconstruction, with increased implant volume. Larger studies are required to further investigate these trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin J. Clegg
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Brett J. Salomon
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Christopher G. Porter
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Thomas W. Mazonas
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Robert E. Heidel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Biostatistics, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Stacy M. Stephenson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Kathleen S. Herbig
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Joseph T. Chun
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Jillian M. Lloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| | - Stefanos Boukovalas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tenn
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patient Decision-Making for Management of Style 410 Anatomical Implants in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151:479-485. [PMID: 36730538 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In July of 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalled the Allergan Natrelle 410 Highly Cohesive Anatomically Shaped Silicone-Filled Textured Breast Implants because of a heightened risk of developing breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). The objective of this study was to describe patient decision-making in management of preexisting 410 textured implants. METHODS A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted to determine all patients who received 410 anatomical implants from two surgeons. Patients who received these implants were contacted in July to September of 2019 regarding the FDA recall and asked to schedule a consultation to discuss explant/exchange versus surveillance. Outcomes analyzed included decision of surveillance versus explantation and subsequent reconstructive operations. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients had received 410 implants from 2013 to 2017. Of the 147 breasts that were reconstructed, 58.5% were oncologic mastectomies and 41.5% were prophylactic. The majority of patients (71.9%) cited BIA-ALCL as the predominant influencing factor in their decision for management. Other factors included appearance, implant concerns unrelated to BIA-ALCL, and other medical conditions. Twenty patients (22.5%) underwent explantation of the Style 410 implants. The remaining 77.5% of patients elected for monitored surveillance. There was a significant association between a history of breast cancer and explantation of the Style 410 implants ( P = 0.0335). CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with Style 410 textured implants elected to undergo surveillance for BIA-ALCL. When deciding to explant or exchange the Style 410 implants, plastic surgeons should work in conjunction with their patients to carefully outline management options.
Collapse
|
18
|
Discussion: Patient Decision-Making for Management of Style 410 Anatomical Implants in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151:486-487. [PMID: 36821570 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
|
19
|
Randquist C, Jaeger M, Stavrou D. Six-Year Evaluation of Motiva Round and Ergonomix SmoothSilk Surface Silicone Breast Implants: A Two-Center, Two-Surgeon Outcome Analysis of 1053 Primary and Secondary Breast Augmentations and Augmentation Mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43:295-307. [PMID: 36351037 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emerging concerns around breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and other chronic inflammatory-related conditions have instigated a wider use of smooth devices. OBJECTIVES The authors aimed to present 6-year data following the introduction of Motiva implants (Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.; Alajuela, Costa Rica) into their previously texture-dominated practice. Additionally, the authors aimed to provide technical recommendations on how to efficiently incorporate these devices into surgical practice and minimize the learning curve. METHODS Data of 1053 primary and secondary breast augmentations conducted between April 2015 and December 2020 in 2 centers (Victoriakliniken in Sweden and the European Institute of Plastic Surgery in Cyprus) were retrospectively evaluated to obtain data on chosen implant characteristics and complications that led to reoperation, prior to and following modifications to surgical practice in 2018. RESULTS The data from 6 consecutive years demonstrate a low device-related complication rate with Motiva implants. In 2018, following adaptions in surgical practice, the complication rate significantly declined. CONCLUSIONS Motiva implants demonstrate a low complication rate and safety profile for women undergoing primary and secondary breast augmentation procedures. However, to reap the benefits of the antifibrotic profile, technical adaptions and optimal patient planning based on the patient and device characteristics are instrumental. Employing the key principles laid out in this study provides a means for delivering both clinically safe options to patients with aesthetically pleasing long-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
20
|
The Role of Microorganisms in the Development of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12020313. [PMID: 36839585 PMCID: PMC9961223 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a variant of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) associated with textured-surface silicone breast implants. Since first being described in 1997, over 1100 cases have been currently reported worldwide. A causal relationship between BIA-ALCL and textured implants has been established in epidemiological studies, but a multifactorial process is likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of BIA-ALCL. However, pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear. One of the hypotheses that could explain the link between textured implants and BIA-ALCL consists in the greater tendency of bacterial biofilm in colonizing the surface of textured implants compared to smooth implants, and the resulting chronic inflammation which, in predisposed individuals, may lead to tumorigenesis. This review summarizes the existing evidence on the role of micro-organisms and rough surface implants in the development of BIA-ALCL. It also provides insights into the most updated clinical practice knowledge about BIA-ALCL, from clinical presentation and investigation to treatment and outcomes.
Collapse
|
21
|
Woo SH, Yoon IA, Choi EJ, Han HH, Eom JS, Lee TJ, Kim EK. Outcomes of smooth round implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Long-term follow-up results. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2023; 57:370-375. [PMID: 36074789 DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2022.2118757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
The issue of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in 2019 has resulted in the discontinuation of textured breast implants and resumption in the use of smooth round implants. However, in the field of breast reconstruction, long-term follow-up data for direct-to-implant reconstruction using smooth round implants is insufficient. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of breast reconstruction using smooth round implants. This study included 185 patients (208 breasts) who underwent smooth round implant-based immediate breast reconstruction between 2007 and 2018. Their demographic information and surgical and oncological data were collected. Early (within 90 days) and late (after 90 days) complications, reoperations, implant maintenance, and the survival rate were analyzed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and identify the related factors. The mean follow-up period was 112.08 months. The most common early complications were skin necrosis (9.13%) and infection (3.85%). The factors influencing the development of early complications were the mastectomy specimen weight (237.14 ± 114.84 cc and 298.04 ± 141.53 cc for no complication and any complication, respectively; p = 0.0123) and implant volume (222.79 ± 77.76 cc and 264.48 ± 89.03 cc for no complication and any complication, respectively; p = 0.0082). The most common late complication was capsular contracture (13.46%). Approximately 91.35% of the implants were maintained during the follow-up period. The factors affecting the development of early complications and implant maintenance were the mastectomy specimen weight and implant volume. This study provides information on long-term follow-up results useful in cases where only smooth round implants are available, which can then serve as a basis for future related studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Hyun Woo
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ah Yoon
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jeong Choi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Ho Han
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sup Eom
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Taik Jong Lee
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Eun Key Kim
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee YJ, Kanchwala SK, Cho H, Jolly JC, Jablonka E, Tanis M, Kamien RD, Yang S. Natural Shaping of Acellular Dermal Matrices for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction via Expansile Kirigami. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2023; 35:e2208088. [PMID: 36394177 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202208088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
To complete a successful and aesthetic breast reconstruction for breast cancer survivors, tissue reinforcing acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are widely utilized to create slings/pockets to keep breast implants or autologous tissue transfer secured against the chest wall in the desired location. However, ADM sheets are 2D and cannot completely cover the entire implant without wrinkles. Here, guided by finite element modeling, a kirigami strategy is presented to cut the ADM sheets with locally and precisely controlled stretchability, curvature, and elasticity. Upon expansion, a single kirigami ADM sheet can conformably wrap the implant regardless of the shape and size, forming a natural teardrop shape; contour cuts prescribe the topographical height and fractal cuts in the center ensures horizontal expandability and thus conformability. This kirigami ADM can provide support to the reconstructed breast in the desired regions, potentially offering optimal outcomes and patient-specific reconstruction, while minimizing operative time and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Joo Lee
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Suhail K Kanchwala
- University of Pennsylvania, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Perelman Center of Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Hyesung Cho
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Jason Christopher Jolly
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Eric Jablonka
- University of Pennsylvania, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Perelman Center of Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Michael Tanis
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Randall D Kamien
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| | - Shu Yang
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Foroushani FT, Dzobo K, Khumalo NP, Mora VZ, de Mezerville R, Bayat A. Advances in surface modifications of the silicone breast implant and impact on its biocompatibility and biointegration. Biomater Res 2022; 26:80. [PMID: 36517896 PMCID: PMC9749192 DOI: 10.1186/s40824-022-00314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Silicone breast implants are commonly used for cosmetic and oncologic surgical indications owing to their inertness and being nontoxic. However, complications including capsular contracture and anaplastic large cell lymphoma have been associated with certain breast implant surfaces over time. Novel implant surfaces and modifications of existing ones can directly impact cell-surface interactions and enhance biocompatibility and integration. The extent of foreign body response induced by breast implants influence implant success and integration into the body. This review highlights recent advances in breast implant surface technologies including modifications of implant surface topography and chemistry and effects on protein adsorption, and cell adhesion. A comprehensive online literature search was performed for relevant articles using the following keywords silicone breast implants, foreign body response, cell adhesion, protein adsorption, and cell-surface interaction. Properties of silicone breast implants impacting cell-material interactions including surface roughness, wettability, and stiffness, are discussed. Recent studies highlighting both silicone implant surface activation strategies and modifications to enhance biocompatibility in order to prevent capsular contracture formation and development of anaplastic large cell lymphoma are presented. Overall, breast implant surface modifications are being extensively investigated in order to improve implant biocompatibility to cater for increased demand for both cosmetic and oncologic surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Tavakoli Foroushani
- Wound and Keloid Scarring Research Unit, Hair and Skin Research Laboratory, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The South African Medical Research Council, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kevin Dzobo
- Wound and Keloid Scarring Research Unit, Hair and Skin Research Laboratory, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The South African Medical Research Council, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nonhlanhla P Khumalo
- Wound and Keloid Scarring Research Unit, Hair and Skin Research Laboratory, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The South African Medical Research Council, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | - Ardeshir Bayat
- Wound and Keloid Scarring Research Unit, Hair and Skin Research Laboratory, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The South African Medical Research Council, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
BIA-ALCL-Horizon Scanning. JPRAS Open 2022; 34:245-251. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
25
|
Tampaki EC, Tampakis A. Breast Reconstruction: Necessity for Further Standardization of the Current Surgical Techniques Attempting to Facilitate Scientific Evaluation and Select Tailored Individualized Procedures Optimizing Patient Satisfaction. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 16:574-583. [PMID: 35087360 DOI: 10.1159/000518745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Various breast cancer reconstruction methods and novel surgical techniques include autologous or allogenic procedures, which can increase patient's quality of life and provide options when dealing with patients seen as challenging clinical scenarios. Summary Our aim was to review the current literature and present published evidence on innovative standards in whole breast reconstruction. Advances in flap monitoring or newly published data regarding neurotization in breast reconstruction, arm lymphedema management, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma reconstruction treatment, and robotic surgery with regard to radiotherapy define innovative standards in the breast reconstruction setting. The role of meshes/acellular dermal matrix and fat grafting as well as optimal sequencing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction appear highly debatable also in expert panel meetings rendering further clinical research including RCTs imperative. Key Messages There is an abundance of novel available techniques, which mandate further standardization, facilitating scientific evaluation in an attempt to help surgeons select tailored procedures for each patient with the goal to promote informed decision-making in breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Athanasios Tampakis
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McKernan CD, Vorstenbosch J, Chu JJ, Nelson JA. Breast Implant Safety: an Overview of Current Regulations and Screening Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:212-216. [PMID: 34027608 PMCID: PMC8738800 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06899-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Breast implant surgery for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes is becoming increasingly common. While the devices used are regulated and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, all patients with breast implants require continued follow-up. Many patients will seek this care from their primary care providers, especially when follow-up with their plastic surgeon is difficult. It is vital that treating clinicians are knowledgeable about the history of breast implants, routine screening guidelines, and the recent breast implant "hot topics"-breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), connective tissue disease, and breast implant illness. This paper will provide the necessary information for primary care providers to appropriately counsel patients with breast implants to maintain not only their trust, but also their health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayla D McKernan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Vorstenbosch
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacqueline J Chu
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Ann Van Wicklin
- Sharon Ann Van Wicklin, PhD, RN, CNOR, CRNFA(E), CPSN-R, PLNC, FAAN, ISPAN-F, is Editor-in-Chief, Plastic Surgical Nursing, and is a Perioperative and Legal Nurse Consultant, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report about Masking Effect of Facial Masks in the COVID-19 Pandemic. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3783. [PMID: 34422530 PMCID: PMC8376388 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 global pandemic commenced widespread usage of face masks. Due to covering of the lower face in public settings, limited social interaction, and patient hesitancy for seeking in-person healthcare, dermatologic conditions of the lower face are prone to delayed diagnosis and management. With society recovering from the pandemic and social distancing restrictions being lifted, an increasing number of patients present with malignant skin conditions at advanced stage. The authors describe a 47-year-old female patient who presented with a 4-month-old facial mass that was initially believed to originate from skin irritation caused by mask-wearing. A biopsy revealed primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL). This case report outlines the management of the rare PC-ALCL lesion and diagnostic challenges related to facial masks and social distancing.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in women. Along with increasing demands for breast reconstruction, the attention given to the psychological and aesthetic benefits of breast reconstruction has also increased. As breast reconstruction and augmentation demands increase, biomaterials for breast reconstruction are being developed, and the related industry is growing quickly worldwide. Among the various biomaterials used for breast enlargement, breast implants have undergone a remarkable evolution since the 1960s. Despite unsatisfactory results and unexpected complications, research dedicated to achieving an ideal breast implant has progressed. In accordance with attention to tissue engineering, a three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technique for breast tissue regeneration has emerged to overcome the current limitations of breast biomaterials. Along with solid implants, injectable liquid-type fillers are also part of ongoing studies.
Collapse
|