Cardiovascular health among persons with HIV without existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Advances in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease in the Setting of Human Immunodeficiency Virus

This state-of-the art review discusses the underlying mechanisms that contribute to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure and arrhythmias among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), risk prediction and prevention, management, and outstanding research questions, including a discussion of how the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV may inform clinical practice.

Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States

Background

People with HIV (PWH) are at elevated risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (UREGs) with HIV in the southern U.S. are disproportionately affected, yet whether cardiology specialist care for this at-risk group improves blood pressure and lipid control or prevents cardiovascular events is unknown.

Methods

We evaluated a cohort of PWH from UREGs at elevated ASCVD risk without known cardiovascular disease who received HIV-related care from 2015-2018 at four academic medical centers in the Southern United States with follow up through 2020. Primary outcomes were blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg) and lipid control (LDL-C ≤ 100 mg/dl) over 2 years and time to first major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) event. Statistical analyses were adjusted for cohort/site and patient factors including HIV measures and comorbidities.

Results

Among 3972 included PWH (median age 47 years old, 32.6% female) without diagnosed cardiovascular disease, 276 (6.9%) had a cardiology clinic visit. Cardiology clinic visits were not significantly associated with subsequent blood pressure control (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.49-1.24, p=0.29) or lipid control (adjusted OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.72-7.01, p=0.16). Over a median follow up of 5 years, patients who had a cardiology clinic visit had higher risk of MACE, overall mortality, and falsification endpoints (hospitalization or death from accident/trauma and pneumonia/sepsis) indicating a higher risk group overall, even after adjusting for measured risk factors.

Conclusions

Among UREG PWH at elevated cardiovascular risk, a cardiology clinic visit was not associated with improved cardiovascular risk factors or reduced risk of cardiovascular events. Our study suggests that seeing a cardiologist is not alone sufficient to promote cardiovascular health or prevent cardiovascular events among PWH, but with low confidence given the higher risk among those who had a cardiology visit.

The dynamic risk factors of cardiovascular disease among people living with HIV: a real-world data study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the incidence and dynamic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among people living with HIV (PLWH).

METHODS

In this population-based statewide cohort study, we utilized integrated electronic health records data to identify adult (age ≥ 18) who were diagnosed with HIV between 2006 and 2019 and were CVD event-free at the HIV diagnosis in South Carolina. The associations of HIV-related factors and traditional risk factors with the CVD incidence were investigated during the overall study period, and by different follow-up periods (i.e., 0-5yrs, 6-10yrs 11-15yrs) using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 9,082 eligible participants, the incidence of CVD was 18.64 cases per 1000 person-years. Overall, conventional risk factors, such as tobacco use, hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease (CKD), were persistently associated with the outcome across all three groups. While HIV-related factors, such as recent CD4 count (e.g., > 350 vs. <200 cells/mm3: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] range: 0.18-0.25), and percent of years in retention (e.g., 31-75% vs. 0-30%: aOR range: 0.24-0.57) were associated with lower odds of CVD incidence regardless of different follow up periods. The impact of the percent of days with viral suppression gradually diminished as the follow-up period increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining an optimal viral suppression might prevent CVD incidence in the short term, whereas restoring immune recovery may be beneficial for reducing CVD risk regardless of the duration of HIV diagnosis. Our findings suggest the necessity of conducting more targeted interventions during different periods of HIV infection.