Expanding the Margins: High Volume Utilization of Marginal Liver Grafts Among >2000 Liver Transplants at a Single Institution

Safety and use of late-turndown liver allografts to increase rate of transplantation

BACKGROUND

The demand for liver transplants (LT) in the United States far surpasses the availability of allografts. New allocation schemes have resulted in occasional difficulties with allograft placement and increased intraoperative turndowns. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes related to use of late-turndown liver allografts.

METHODS

A review of prospectively collected data of LTs at a single center from July 2019 to July 2023 was performed. Late-turndown placement was defined as an open offer 6 h prior to donation, intraoperative turndown by primary center, or post-cross-clamp turndown.

RESULTS

Of 565 LTs, 25.1% (n = 142) received a late-turndown liver allograft. There were no significant differences in recipient age, gender, BMI, or race (all p > 0.05), but MELD was lower for the late-turndown LT recipient group (median 15 vs 21, p < 0.001). No difference in 30-day, 6-month, or 1-year survival was noted on logistic regression, and no difference in patient or graft survival was noted on Cox proportional hazard regression. Late-turndown utilization increased during the study from 17.2% to 25.8%, and median waitlist time decreased from 77 days in 2019 to 18 days in 2023 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of late-turndown livers has increased and can increase transplant rates without compromising post-transplant outcomes with appropriate selection.

Organ Utilization Rates from Non-Ideal Donors for Solid Organ Transplant in the United States

Background: Non-ideal donors provide acceptable allografts and may expand the donor pool. This study evaluates donor utilization across solid organs over 15-years in the United States. Methods: We analyzed the OPTN STAR database to identify potential donors across three donor eras: 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. Donors were analyzed by a composite Donor Utilization Score (DUS), comprised of donor age and comorbidities. Outcomes of interest were overall and organ-specific donor utilization. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed. p-values < 0.01 considered significant. Results: Of 132,465 donors, 32,710 (24.7%) were identified as non-ideal donors (NID), based on a DUS ≥ 3. Compared to ideal donors (ID), NID were older (median 56 years, IQR 51-64 years vs. 35 years, 22-48 years, p < 0.001) and more frequently female (44.3% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001), Black (22.1% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001) and obese (60.7% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). The likelihood of overall DBD utilization from NID increased from Era 1 to Era 2 (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.123-1.341, p < 0.001) and Era 3 (OR 1.504, 1.376-1.643, p < 0.001), while DCD donor utilization in NID was not statistically different across Eras. Compared to Era 1, the likelihood of DBD utilization from NID for kidney transplantation was lower in Era 2 (OR 0.882, 0.822-0.946) and Era 3 (OR 0.938, 0.876-1.004, p = 0.002). The likelihood of NID utilization increased in Era 3 compared to Era 1 for livers (OR 1.511, 1.411-1.618, p < 0.001), hearts (OR 1.623, 1.415-1.862, p < 0.001), and lungs (OR 2.251, 2.011-2.520, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Using a universal definition of NID across organs, NID donor utilization is increasing; however, use of DUS may improve resource utilization in identifying donors at highest likelihood for multi-organ donation.

Current role and perspectives of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review of the past 20 years

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant global health challenge, and liver transplantation (LT) remains the best curative option. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) emerged as a potential solution to organ scarcity, reducing waitlist times. This comprehensive review explores LDLT practices, focusing on patient selection criteria and oncologic outcomes. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines included 50 studies (2004-2023) with 8062 patients. Data encompassed baseline characteristics, HCC features, and oncologic outcomes. Further analysis categorized results by geography and publication year. Heterogeneity in patient demographics, tumor burden, and transplant characteristics was observed. Recent LDLT series demonstrated a shift towards refined selection criteria, increased neoadjuvant treatment, and improved oncologic outcomes. Geographic disparities revealed unique challenges in Eastern and Western practices. LDLT proves effective for HCC, addressing donor shortages. Evolving practices highlight the importance of refining inclusion criteria and optimizing tumor management. While geographic differences exist, LDLT, when judiciously applied, offers promising outcomes.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin for Infection After Adult Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Post-operative infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in adults early after liver transplantation (LT). Procalcitonin (PCT) may be a good test method for early diagnosis of post-operative infection and determining its severity. This study was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PCT as a biomarker for infection after LT. Patients and Methods: A meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted for studies reporting diagnostic performance of PCT for infection in adults after LT. Observational studies were evaluated for their reporting of diagnostic accuracy, relevance, and quality. Results: Ten eligible studies assessing 730 patients were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review summarizing the diagnostic value of PCT for post-operative infection in adult liver transplantation. Pooled sensitivity and specificity with corresponding 95% confidence interval were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54-81; heterogeneity I2 = 82.4%) and 88% (95% CI, 82-92; I2 = 52.7%), respectively. The diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) was 16 (95% CI, 10-25; I2 = 76.4%). The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) of PCT for post-operative infection was 0.88. There was a wide range of variability in the cutoff values, ranging from 0.22 to 42.80 ng/mL. Heterogeneity was reduced by excluding studies that focused on pediatric LT recipients. Conclusions: Procalcitonin is a moderately accurate diagnostic marker for post-operative infection in adult LT. Additionally, the diagnostic performance can be improved by combining it with other inflammatory biomarkers. This article provides the research direction for post-operative infection control.

Outcomes after liver transplantation using deceased after circulatory death donors: A comparison of outcomes in the UK and the US

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Identifying international differences in utilization and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) after donation after circulatory death (DCD) donation provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and population-level insight.

METHODS

Adult (≥18 years) LT data between 2008 and 2018 from the UK and US were used to assess mortality and graft failure after DCD LT. We used time-dependent Cox-regression methods to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for risk-adjusted short-term (0-90 days) and longer-term (90 days-5 years) outcomes.

RESULTS

One-thousand five-hundred-and-sixty LT receipts from the UK and 3426 from the US were included. Over the study period, the use of DCD livers increased from 15.7% to 23.9% in the UK compared to 5.1% to 7.6% in the US. In the UK, DCD donors were older (UK:51 vs. US:33 years) with longer cold ischaemia time (UK: 437 vs. US: 333 min). Recipients in the US had higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, higher body mass index, higher proportions of ascites, encephalopathy, diabetes and previous abdominal surgeries. No difference in the risk-adjusted short-term mortality or graft failure was observed between the countries. In the longer-term (90 days-5 years), the UK had lower mortality and graft failure (adj.mortality HR:UK: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.49-0.80); graft failure HR: UK: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91). The cumulative incidence of retransplantation was higher in the UK (5 years: UK: 11.9% vs. 4.6%; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

For those receiving a DCD LT, longer-term post-transplant outcomes in the UK are superior to the US, however, significant differences in recipient illness, graft quality and access to retransplantation were seen between the two countries.

Impact of Donor Liver Macrovesicular Steatosis on Deceased Donor Yield and Posttransplant Outcome

BACKGROUND

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) had not traditionally considered biopsy results in risk-adjustment models, yet biopsy results may influence outcomes and thus decisions regarding organ acceptance.

METHODS

Using SRTR data, which includes data on all donors, waitlisted candidates, and transplant recipients in the United States, we assessed (1) the impact of macrovesicular steatosis on deceased donor yield (defined as number of livers transplanted per donor) and 1-y posttransplant graft failure and (2) the effect of incorporating this variable into existing SRTR risk-adjustment models.

RESULTS

There were 21 559 donors with any recovered organ and 17 801 liver transplant recipients included for analysis. Increasing levels of macrovesicular steatosis on donor liver biopsy predicted lower organ yield: ≥31% macrovesicular steatosis on liver biopsy was associated with 87% to 95% lower odds of utilization, with 55% of these livers being discarded. The hazard ratio for graft failure with these livers was 1.53, compared with those with no pretransplant liver biopsy and 0% to 10% steatosis. There was minimal change on organ procurement organization-specific deceased donor yield or program-specific posttransplant outcome assessments when macrovesicular steatosis was added to the risk-adjustment models.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor livers with macrovesicular steatosis are disproportionately not transplanted relative to their risk for graft failure. To avoid undue risk aversion, SRTR now accounts for macrovesicular steatosis in the SRTR risk-adjustment models to help facilitate use of these higher-risk organs. Increased recognition of this variable may also encourage further efforts to standardize the reporting of liver biopsy results.

Complement-targeting therapeutics for ischemia-reperfusion injury in transplantation and the potential for ex vivo delivery

Organ shortages and an expanding waitlist have led to increased utilization of marginal organs. All donor organs are subject to varying degrees of IRI during the transplant process. Extended criteria organs, including those from older donors and organs donated after circulatory death are especially vulnerable to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Involvement of the complement cascade in mediating IRI has been studied extensively. Complement plays a vital role in the propagation of IRI and subsequent recruitment of the adaptive immune elements. Complement inhibition at various points of the pathway has been shown to mitigate IRI and minimize future immune-mediated injury in preclinical models. The recent introduction of ex vivo machine perfusion platforms provides an ideal window for therapeutic interventions. Here we review the role of complement in IRI by organ system and highlight potential therapeutic targets for intervention during ex vivo machine preservation of donor organs.

Prognostic Factors Evaluation for Liver Transplant Mismatching: A New Way of Selecting and Allocating Organs

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant (LT) is the standard therapy for end-stage liver disease. Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression protocols improved the results of LT by increasing long-term survival. Nevertheless, an adequate match between the donor and recipient is paramount for avoiding futile liver transplants. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors in donor-recipient LT matching.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of adult LT was conducted from January 2006 to December 2018, which included the following transplant modalities: deceased donor LT (DDLT), living donor LT (LDLT), combined liver-kidney transplant (CLKT), and domino LT (DLT).

RESULTS

Among 1101 patients who underwent LT, 958 patients underwent DDLT, 92 patients underwent LDLT, 45 patients underwent CLKT, and 6 patients underwent DLT. The overall survival (OS) in 1, 5, and 10 years were 89%, 83%, and 82%, respectively. For DDLT, OS in 1, 5, and 10 years were 91%, 84%, and 82%, respectively. For LDLT, OS in 1, 5, and 10 years were 89%, 72%, and 69%, respectively. For CKLT, OS in 1, 5, and 10 years were 90%, 71%, and 71%, respectively. None of the DLT patients died. For DDLT, the factors that affected OS were the presence of fulminant liver failure (odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% CI, 1.18-4.18; P = .001), hemodialysis before LT (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.27-3.5; P = .004), retransplant (OR, 4.74; 95% CI, 2.75-8.17; P = .000), and recipient age >60 years (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.27-2.73; P = .001). For hospitalization before LT (due to an acute-on-chronic liver failure), the OR was 2.10 (95% CI, 1.29-3.42; P = .003). Donor intensive care unit time >7 days (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04-2.06; P = .02) was also associated with overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified prognostic factors in donor-recipient LT matching. Furthermore, we demonstrated that an adequate organ allocation with donor-recipient selection might increase graft survival and reduce waiting list mortality.

Disparities in the Use of Older Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Allografts in the United States Versus the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the characteristics and posttransplant survival of patients who received donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts from donors aged >60 y.

METHODS

Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry and the United Network for Organ Sharing databases. Cohorts were dichotomized into donor age subgroups (donor >60 y [D >60]; donor ≤60 y [D ≤60]). Study period: January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

1157 DCD LTs were performed in the United Kingdom versus 3394 in the United States. Only 13.8% of US DCD donors were aged >50 y, contrary to 44.3% in the United Kingdom. D >60 were 22.6% in the United Kingdom versus 2.4% in the United States. In the United Kingdom, 64.2% of D >60 clustered in 2 metropolitan centers. In the United States, there was marked inter-regional variation. A total of 78.3% of the US DCD allografts were used locally. One- and 5-y unadjusted DCD graft survival was higher in the United Kingdom versus the United States (87.3% versus 81.4%, and 78.0% versus 71.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). One- and 5-y D >60 graft survival was higher in the United Kingdom (87.3% versus 68.1%, and 77.9% versus 51.4%, United Kingdom versus United States, respectively; P < 0.001). In both groups, grafts from donors ≤30 y had the best survival. Survival was similar for donors aged 41 to 50 versus 51 to 60 in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the United Kingdom, older DCD LT utilization remained low in the United States, with worse D >60 survival. Nonetheless, present data indicate similar survivals for older donors aged ≤60, supporting an extension to the current US DCD age cutoff.

Offer Acceptance Patterns for Liver Donors Aged 70 and Older

Despite a documented survival benefit, older liver donor (OLD, age ≥70) graft offers are frequently declined, with utilization worsening over the last decade. To understand how offer acceptance varies by center, we studied 1113 eventually transplanted OLD grafts from 2009 to 2017 using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data and random-intercept multilevel logistic regression. To understand how center-level acceptance of OLD graft offers might be associated with waitlist and posttransplant outcomes, we studied all adult, actively listed, liver-only candidates and recipients during the study period using Poisson regression (transplant rate), competing risks regression (waitlist mortality), and Cox regression (posttransplant mortality). Among 117 centers, OLD offer acceptance ranged from 0 (23 centers) to 95 acceptances, with a median odds ratio of 2.88. Thus, a candidate may be three times as likely to receive an OLD graft simply by listing at a different center. Centers in the highest quartile (Q4) of OLD acceptance (accepted 39% of OLD offers) accepted more nationally shared organs (Q4 versus Q1: 14.1% versus 0.0%, P < 0.001) and had higher annual liver transplant volume (Q4 versus Q1: 80 versus 21, P < 0.001). After adjustment, nationally shared OLD offers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.20) and offers to centers with higher median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) at transplant (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87) were less likely to be accepted. OLD offers to centers with higher annual transplant volume were more likely to be accepted (aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.14-1.30). Additionally, candidates listed at centers within the highest quartile of OLD graft offer acceptance had higher deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) rates (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.41-1.50), lower waitlist mortality (adjusted subhazard ratio: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.76), and similar posttransplant survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-1.01) when compared with those listed at centers in the lowest quartile of OLD graft offer acceptance. The wide variation in OLD offer acceptance supports the need for optimizing the organ offer process and efficiently directing OLD offers to centers more likely to use them.

Proposal and validation of a liver graft discard score for liver transplantation from deceased donors: a multicenter Italian study

Several studies have explored the risk of graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT) in recent years. Conversely, risk factors for graft discard before or at procurement have poorly been investigated. The study aimed at identifying a score to predict the risk of liver-related graft discard before transplantation. Secondary aims were to test the score for prediction of biopsy-related negative features and post-LT early graft loss. A total of 4207 donors evaluated during the period January 2004–Decemeber 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The group was split into a training set (n = 3,156; 75.0%) and a validation set (n = 1,051; 25.0%). The Donor Rejected Organ Pre-transplantation (DROP) Score was proposed: − 2.68 + (2.14 if Regional Share) + (0.03*age) + (0.04*weight)-(0.03*height) + (0.29 if diabetes) + (1.65 if anti-HCV-positive) + (0.27 if HBV core) − (0.69 if hypotension) + (0.09*creatinine) + (0.38*log10AST) + (0.34*log10ALT) + (0.06*total bilirubin). At validation, the DROP Score showed the best AUCs for the prediction of liver-related graft discard (0.82; p < 0.001) and macrovesicular steatosis ≥ 30% (0.71; p < 0.001). Patients exceeding the DROP 90th centile had the worse post-LT results (3-month graft loss: 82.8%; log-rank P = 0.024).The DROP score represents a valuable tool to predict the risk of liver function-related graft discard, steatosis, and early post-LT graft survival rates. Studies focused on the validation of this score in other geographical settings are required.

NRF2 assessment in discarded liver allografts: A role in allograft function and salvage

Antioxidant defence mechanisms, such as the nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related-factor-2 (NRF2) axis, are integral to oxidative stress responses and ischemic injury. Hepatic antioxidant capacity is contingent on parenchymal quality, and there is a need to develop new insights into key molecular mechanisms in marginal liver allografts that might provide therapeutic targets. This study examines the clinical relevance of NRF2 in donor livers and its response to normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). Discarded donor livers (n = 40) were stratified into a high NRF2 and low NRF2 group by quantifying NRF2 expression. High NRF2 livers had significantly lower transaminase levels, hepatic vascular inflammation and peri-portal CD3⁺ T cell infiltration. Human liver allografts (n = 8) were then exposed to 6-h of NMP and high NRF2 livers had significantly reduced liver enzyme alterations and improved lactate clearance. To investigate these findings further, we used a rat fatty-liver model, treating livers with an NRF2 agonist during NMP. Treated livers had increased NRF2 expression and reduced transaminase derangements following NMP compared to vehicle control. These results support the association of elevated NRF2 expression with improved liver function. Targeting this axis could have a rationale in future studies and NRF2 agonists may represent a supplemental treatment strategy for rescuing marginal donor livers.

Predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation using a novel model that incorporates tumor and donor-related factors

Evidence suggests that liver graft quality impacts on posttransplant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As of today, selection criteria only use variables related to tumor characteristics. Within the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation between 2004 and 2016 (development cohort, n = 10 887). Based on tumor recurrence rates, we fitted a competing-risk regression incorporating tumor- and donor-related factors, and we developed a prognostic score. Results were validated both internally and externally in the Australia and New Zealand Liver Transplant Registry. Total tumor diameter (subhazard ratio [sub-HR] 1.52 [1.28-1.81]), alpha-feto protein (sub-HR 1.27 [1.23-1.32], recipient male gender (sub-HR 1.43 [1.18-1.74]), elevated donor body mass index (sub-HR 1.26 [1.01-1.58]), and shared graft allocation policy (sub-HR 1.20 [1.01-1.43]) were independently associated with tumor recurrence. We next developed the Darlica score (sub-HR 2.72 [2.41-3.08] P < 0.001) that allows identifying risky combinations between a given donor and a given recipient. Results were validated internally (n = 3 629) and externally in the Australia and New Zealand Liver Transplant Registry (n = 370). The current score is based on variables that are readily available at the time of graft offer. It allows identifying hazardous donor-recipient combinations in terms of risk of tumor recurrence and overall survival.

Endogenous Interleukin-33 Acts as an Alarmin in Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion and Is Associated With Injury After Human Liver Transplantation

Ischemia and reperfusion injury is an early inflammatory process during liver transplantation that impacts on graft function and clinical outcomes. Interleukin (IL)-33 is a danger-associated molecular pattern involved in kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury and several liver diseases. The aims were to assess whether IL-33 was released as an alarmin responsible for ischemia/reperfusion injury in a mouse model of warm hepatic ischemia, and whether this hypothesis could also apply in the setting of human liver transplantation. First, a model of warm hepatic ischemia/reperfusion was used in wild-type and IL-33–deficient mice. Severity of ischemia/reperfusion injury was assessed with ALT and histological analysis. Then, serum IL-33 was measured in a pilot cohort of 40 liver transplant patients. Hemodynamic postreperfusion syndrome, graft dysfunction (assessed by model for early allograft scoring >6), renal failure, and tissue lesions on time-zero biopsies were assessed. In the mouse model, IL-33 was constitutively expressed in the nucleus of endothelial cells, immediately released in response to hepatic pedicle clamping without neosynthesis, and participated in the recruitment of neutrophils and tissue injury on site. The kinetics of IL-33 in liver transplant patients strikingly matched the ones in the animal model, as attested by serum levels reaching a peak immediately after reperfusion, which correlated to clinical outcomes including postreperfusion syndrome, posttransplant renal failure, graft dysfunction, and histological lesions of ischemia/reperfusion injury. IL-33 was an independent factor of graft dysfunction with a cutoff of IL-33 at 73 pg/ml after reperfusion (73% sensitivity, area under the curve of 0.76). Taken together, these findings establish the immediate implication of IL-33 acting as an alarmin in liver I/R injury and provide evidence of its close association with cardinal features of early liver injury-associated disorders in LT patients.

The Utility of Extended Criteria Donor Livers in High Acuity Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Although the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) liver allografts has gained momentum as a potential method by which to expand the donor pool, their use largely remains relegated to low acuity liver transplant (LT) recipients. Thus, we sought to examine whether such grafts also have utility in high acuity (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] ≥ 35) recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Extended criteria donors were defined as donor age > 60 years, hepatitis C virus positive donor, split livers, livers with cold ischemia time > 12 h, donor after cardiac death livers, or having macrosteatosis > 30%. Outcomes were compared between standard liver (SL) and ECD grafts in recipients with MELD ≥ 35.

RESULTS

Of 225 patients, 46 (20.4%) received an ECD liver and 179 (79.6%) received a SL. Extended criteria donor graft recipients had significantly higher levels of post-LT maximal transaminases and rate of early allograft dysfunction. Nonetheless, high acuity ECD graft recipients had similar short- and long-term patient survival compared to SL recipients, with 1-,3-, and 5-year survivals of 86.9%, 82.3%, 79.3% and 86.9%, 80.5%, and 75.4%, respectively (P = .674). There were also no significant differences in graft survival or rejection-free survival between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The lack of inferior patient/graft survival among high acuity ECD graft recipients suggests that ECD livers present a viable method by which to expand the donor pool for this group of patients.

Design, Analysis, and Pitfalls of Clinical Trials Using Ex Situ Liver Machine Perfusion: The International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Recent trials in liver machine perfusion (MP) have revealed unique challenges beyond those seen in most clinical studies. Correct trial design and interpretation of data are essential to avoid drawing conclusions that may compromise patient safety and increase costs.

METHODS

The International Liver Transplantation Society, through the Special Interest Group "DCD, Preservation and Machine Perfusion," established a working group to write consensus statements and guidelines on how future clinical trials in liver perfusion should be designed, with particular focus on relevant clinical endpoints and how different techniques of liver perfusion should be compared. Protocols, abstracts, and full published papers of clinical trials using liver MP were reviewed. The use of a simplified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group (GRADE) system was attempted to assess the level of evidence. The working group presented its conclusions at the International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference "DCD, Liver Preservation, and Machine Perfusion" held in Venice, Italy, on January 31, 2020.

RESULTS

Twelve recommendations were proposed with the main conclusions that clinical trials investigating the effect of MP in liver transplantation should (1) make the protocol publicly available before the start of the trial, (2) be adequately powered, and (3) carefully consider timing of randomization in function of the primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There are issues with using accepted primary outcomes of liver transplantation trials in the context of MP trials, and no ideal endpoint could be defined by the working group. The setup of an international registry was considered vital by the working group.

Understanding the Final Disposition of Livers Declined After the Start of Procurement: A Nationwide Organ Procurement Organization Effort

Declining a liver offer during organ procurement likely increases the risk of discard, but the specifics around late reallocation remain obscure. This voluntarily submitted, prospectively collected data describe late declines and the ultimate disposition of 893 livers. Once a liver suffered an intraoperative decline, only 49% of recovered livers were transplanted. Livers declined ≥80 minutes prior to cross-clamp were transplanted 80% of the time versus livers declined ≥80 minutes after cross-clamp, which were transplanted 45% of the time. The final disposition of these livers was into a predetermined backup patient (51%) or required an out-of-sequence expedited allocation (42%). Prerecovery imaging and prerecovery biopsy did not influence the ability to reallocate a liver, and livers from donors after circulatory death are rarely successfully reallocated. In conclusion, this study begins to shed light on this seemingly common practice. A total of 85% of centers had an intraoperative decline, but 4% of centers accounted for 25% of the declines. Organ procurement organizations often enter expedited liver allocation, and instituting a cross-clamp delay to allow for reallocation may influence the disposition of these liver grafts. Expedited allocation was more time consuming than allocation into a predetermined backup. Although a certain number of intraoperative declines probably suggests a healthy amount of donor selection aggressiveness at the time of the initial organ offer, the 47% risk of discard of livers declined intraoperatively suggests that United Network for Organ Sharing should consider systematically collecting data about intraoperative declines so we can learn more about this event that influences organ utilization.

Amnion-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cell Paracrine Signals Potentiate Human Liver Organoid Differentiation: Translational Implications for Liver Regeneration

The prevalence of end-stage liver diseases has reached very high levels globally. The election treatment for affected patients is orthotopic liver transplantation, which is a very complex procedure, and due to the limited number of suitable organ donors, considerable research is being done on alternative therapeutic options. For instance, the use of cell therapy, such as the transplantation of hepatocytes to promote liver repair/regeneration, has been explored, but standardized protocols to produce suitable human hepatocytes are still limited. On the other hand, liver progenitor and multipotent stem cells offer potential cell sources that could be used clinically. Different studies have reported regarding the therapeutic effects of transplanted mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) on end-stage liver diseases. Moreover, it has been shown that delivery of MSC-derived conditioned medium (MSC-CM) can reduce cell death and enhance liver proliferation in fulminant hepatic failure. Therefore, it is believed that MSC-CM contains many factors that probably support liver regeneration. In our work, we used an in vitro model of human liver organoids to study if the paracrine components secreted by human amnion-derived MSCs (hAMSCs) affected liver stem/progenitor cell differentiation. In particular, we differentiated liver organoids derived from bipotent EpCAM⁺ human liver cells and tested the effects of hAMSC secretome, derived from both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) hAMSC cultures, on that model. Our analysis showed that conditioned medium (CM) produced by 3D hAMSCs was able to induce an over-expression of mature hepatocyte markers, such as ALB, NTCP, and CYP3A4, compared with both 2D hAMSC cultures and the conventional differentiation medium (DM). These data were confirmed by the over-production of ALB protein and over-activity of CYP3A4 observed in organoids grown in 3D hAMSC-CM. Liver repair dysfunction plays a role in the development of liver diseases, and effective repair likely requires the normal functioning of liver stem/progenitor cells. Herein, we showed that hAMSC-CM produced mainly by 3D cultures had the potential to increase hepatic stem/progenitor cell differentiation, demonstrating that soluble factors secreted by those cells are potentially responsible for the reaction. This work shows a potential approach to improve liver repair/regeneration also in a transplantation setting.

Expedited placement to maximize utilization of marginal organs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deceased donation represents the largest supply of organs for transplant in the United States. Organs with suboptimal characteristics related to donor disease or recovery-related issues are increasingly discarded at the time of recovery, prompting late allocation to candidates later in the match sequence. Late allocation contributes to organ injury by prolonging cold ischemia, which may further lead to the risk of organ discard, despite the potential to provide benefit to certain transplant candidates.

RECENT FINDINGS

Expedited placement of marginal organs has emerged as a strategy to address the growing problem of organ discard of marginal organs that have been declined late after recovery. In this review, we describe the basis for expedited organ placement, and approaches to facilitating placement of these grafts, drawing examples from kidney and liver donation and transplantation globally.

SUMMARY

There is significant global variation in practice related to late allocation. Multiple policy mechanisms exist to facilitate expedited placement, including simultaneous offers to multiple centers, predesignation of aggressive centers, and increasing organ procurement organization autonomy in late allocation. Optimizing late allocation of deceased donor organs holds significant promise to increase the number of transplants.

Machine Perfusion: Cold versus Warm, versus Neither. Update on Clinical Trials

Machine perfusion (MP) preservation is potentially one of the most significant improvements in the field of liver transplantation in the last 20 years, and it has been considered a promising strategy for improved preservation and ex situ evaluation of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs. However, MP preservation adds significant cost and logistical considerations to liver transplantation. MP protocols are mainly classified according to the perfusion temperature with hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) being the two categories most studied so far. After extensive preclinical work, MP entered the clinical setting, and there are now several studies that demonstrated feasibility and safety. However, because of the limited quality of clinical trials, there is no compelling evidence of superiority in preservation quality, and liver MP is still considered experimental in most countries. MP preservation is moving to a more mature phase, where ongoing and future studies will bring new evidence in order to confirm their superiority in terms of clinical outcomes, organ utilization, and cost-effectiveness. Here, we present an overview of all preclinical MP studies using discarded human livers and liver MP clinical trials, and discuss their results. We describe the different perfusion protocols, pitfalls in MP study design, and provide future perspectives. Recent trials in liver MP have revealed unique challenges beyond those seen in most clinical studies. Randomized trials, correct trial design, and interpretation of data are essential to generate the data necessary to prove if MP will be the new gold standard method of liver preservation.

A Clustered Randomized Trial Informing Patients on Dialysis About Their Ability to Donate Organs and Tissues

INTRODUCTION

The transplant waiting list exceeds the number of organs available. One means of increasing the organ pool is to broaden potential donors to include those with chronic diseases.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The study tested the effectiveness of using peer mentors to encourage individuals on dialysis to enroll on an organ donor registry.

DESIGN

Dialysis units were pair-matched by size and racial composition and then randomized to one of 2 interventions: meetings with a peer mentor (experimental intervention) or organ donation mailings (control). Peer mentors were trained to discuss organ donation with individuals on dialysis during in-person meetings at dialysis units. The primary outcome was verified registration in the state's donor registry.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, gender, race, income, and education and accounting for correlation within the dialysis center, there was a significant intervention effect. Among individuals in the intervention group, the odds of enrolling (verified) on the donor registry were 2.52 times higher than those in the control group.

DISCUSSION

The use of peer mentors to discuss donating organs after death with individuals on dialysis can increase enrollment on a donor registry. Dispelling myths about chronic illness and donation can counter widely held misconceptions and help persons make an informed choice about end-of-life decisions and present an opportunity to increase the number of organs and tissues available for transplant.

Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation with marginal donors

The current supply of acceptable donor livers is not sufficient to meet the demands of listed patients awaiting transplantation resulting in thousands of deaths each year. Increased utilization of marginal livers may help alleviate this supply/demand mismatch by expanding the donor liver pool. The current status of liver transplantation using marginal donor grafts and efforts to optimize usage are discussed with attention to elderly donors, steatotic livers, donors after circulatory death, and split liver grafts.

Applicability of common inflammatory markers in diagnosing infections in early period after liver transplantation in intensive care setting

Infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality early after liver transplantation. The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to evaluate clinical utility of c-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in surveillance of infections early after liver transplantation in intensive care setting. A total of 60 liver transplant recipients were included. CRP, procalcitonin, and NLR assessed at 12-hour intervals were primary variables of interest. Infections and severe complications during postoperative intensive care unit stay were the primary and secondary end-points, respectively. Infections and severe complications were diagnosed in 9 and 17 patients, respectively. Only peak CRP beyond first 48 hours was associated with infections (p = 0.038) with AUC, positive and negative predictive value of 0.728, 42.9% and 92.2%, respectively (cut-off: 142.7 mg/L). Peak procalcitonin over first 60 hours was the earliest predictor (p = 0.050) of severe complications with AUC, positive and negative predictive value of 0.640, 53.3% and 80.0%, respectively (cut-off: 42.8 ng/mL). In conclusion, while CRP, procalcitonin, and NLR cannot be used for accurate diagnosis of infections immediately after liver transplantation, peak CRP beyond 48 hours and peak procalcitonin over first 60 hours may be used for initial exclusion of infections and prediction of severe complications, respectively.

Improvement in Liver Transplant Outcomes From Older Donors: A US National Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate trends in long-term graft and patient outcomes following liver transplantation using grafts from donors ≥60 years old.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The scarcity of donor livers has led to increased utilization of organs from donors ≥60 years old. However, few studies have examined how long-term transplant outcomes from older donors have evolved over time.

METHODS

The OPTN/UNOS database was queried for all first-time isolated adult liver transplants. We identified 14,796 adult liver transplant using donors ≧60-year-old suitable for analysis from 1990 to 2014. Cohorts were then developed based on 5-year intervals of transplant date. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare graft and patient survival for recipients from older donor across each 5-year era.

RESULTS

Utilization of donor grafts ≥60 years old increased steadily for the first 15 years of the study, but has leveled off over the last 10 years. Comparison of the earliest and latest eras in the study was notable for an increase in median recipient age (51 vs. 59, P < 0.001) and reduction in median cold ischemic time (10 vs. 6 h, P = 0.001). Unadjusted 5-year graft and patient survival has improved significantly over time (P < 0.0001). More importantly, the discrepancy in survival between older and younger grafts has narrowed substantially over time (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates significant improvement in transplant outcomes with donor grafts ≥60-years old and supports increased but judicious use of extended criteria donors liver grafts. Improved patient selection and reduction in cold ischemia time appear to be contributing factors.

Liver Transplantation with "Hors Tour" Allocated Versus Standard MELD Allocated Grafts: Single-Center Audit and Impact on the Liver Pool in France

BACKGROUND

The French transplant governing system defined "Rescue" (the so-called "Hors Tour") livers as those livers which were declined for the five top-listed patients. This study compares the outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) in patients who received a donor liver through a rescue allocation (RA) procedure or according to MELD score priority (standard allocation, SA) and evaluates the impact on the graft pool of a proactive policy to accept RA grafts.

METHODS

Data from all consecutive patients who underwent LT with SA or RA grafts from 2011 to 2015 were compared in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The 249 elective first LTs were performed with 64 (25.7%) RA and 185 (74.3%) SA grafts. RA grafts were obtained from older donors and were associated with a longer cold ischemia time. Recipients of RA livers were older and had lower MELD scores. The rates of delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, retransplantation, complications, and mortality were similar between the RA and SA groups. At 1 and 3 and 5 years, graft and patient survival rates were similar between the groups. These results were maintained after matching on recipient characteristics. Our proactive policy to accept RA grafts increased the liver pool for elective first transplantation by 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

RA livers can be safely transplanted into selected recipients and significantly expand the liver pool.

Kidney Donor Profile Index Is a Reliable Alternative to Liver Donor Risk Index in Quantifying Graft Quality in Liver Transplantation

Background.

The most established metric for estimating graft survival from donor characteristics in liver transplantation is the liver donor risk index (LDRI). The LDRI is calculated from donor and transplant-related variables, including cold ischemic time. Because cold ischemic time is unknown at the time of organ offer, LDRI is not available for organ acceptance decisions. In contrast, the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) is derived purely from donor variables known at the time of offer and thus calculated for every deceased donor in the United States. The similarity in donor factors included in LDRI and KDPI led us to hypothesize that KDPI would reliably approximate LDRI in estimating graft survival in liver transplantation.

Methods.

The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was queried for adults who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation from 2002 to 2016. The cohort was divided into quintiles of KDPI and LDRI, and graft survival was calculated according to Kaplan Meier. Hazard ratios for LDRI and KDPI were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, and Uno’s concordance statistic was compared.

Results.

In our analysis of 63 906 cases, KDPI closely approximated LDRI in estimating liver graft survival, with an equivalent concordance statistic of 0.56.

Conclusions.

We conclude that KDPI can serve as a reasonable alternative to LDRI in liver acceptance decisions.

Liver Transplantation Using Right Lobe Graft With Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Report of 2 Cases

We described 2 cases of adult-to-adult liver transplantation using right lobe grafts donated by 2 patients suffering from focal nodular hyperplasia, the volumes of which were 360 cm³ and 220 cm³. This study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of the Helsinki. For preparation of the graft, back-table hepatic venous outflow reconstruction, including replacement of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava and bridging of hepatic segment V5/V8, was performed by using prosthetic vessel grafts. The liver grafts after subtracting the weight of focal nodular hyperplasia functioned well without serious small-for-size syndrome or graft dysfunction in spite of graft-to-recipient weight ratio less than 0.8%. This suggested the functioning of hepatocyte within focal nodular hyperplasia, which avoided graft deficiency. These 2 recipients were given not only conventional immunosuppressants (tacrolimus and mycophenolate sodium) but also anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparin and warfarin). Thrombosis of the prosthetic inferior vena cava 1 month after transplant in recipient 1 was treated by placement of intravascular stent. Biliary duct anastomotic stricture 2 weeks after transplant in recipient 2 was treated by placement of biliary stent. These 2 recipients remain well at more than 2 years post-transplant. These successful explorative cases highlight the safe use of a graft containing focal nodular hyperplasia. The partial liver resection grafts with focal nodular hyperplasia could be applied to the patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Bioengineering Liver Transplantation

Since the first in-man liver transplantation was performed by Starzl et al [...].

Agree on much, except it is time for change

The imbalance between supply and demand of organs for transplant will not be fully solved by changes to the allocation system. Improved organ donation and utilization must be accomplished through critical reassessment of organ procurement organization (OPO) performance as a partnership between transplant centers, OPOs, and community hospitals. The continued discussion on changes to the organ distribution system should be based on patient-centeredness, enhanced transparency, improved models, and metrics. Focusing too heavily on geography without consideration for the other factors at play risks oversimplification of this complex issue.

Survival benefit of accepting livers from deceased donors over 70 years old

Livers from older donors (OLDs; age ≥70) are risky and often declined; however, it is likely that some candidates will benefit from OLDs versus waiting for younger ones. To characterize the survival benefit of accepting OLD grafts, we used 2009-2017 SRTR data to identify 24 431 adult liver transplant (LT) candidates who were offered OLD grafts eventually accepted by someone. Outcomes from the time-of-offer were compared between candidates who accepted an OLD graft and matched controls within MELD ± 2 who declined the same offer. Candidates who accepted OLD grafts (n = 1311) were older (60.5 vs. 57.8 years, P < .001), had a higher median MELD score (25 vs. 22, P < .001), and were less likely to have hepatitis C cirrhosis (14.9% vs. 31.2%, P < .001). Five-year cumulative mortality among those who accepted versus declined the same OLD offer was 23.4% versus 41.2% (P < .001). Candidates who accepted OLDs experienced an almost twofold reduction in mortality (aHR:0.45 0.520.59 , P < .001) compared to those who declined the same offer, especially among the highest MELD (35-40) candidates (aHR:0.10 0.240.55 , P = .001). Accepting an OLD offer provided substantial long-term survival benefit compared to waiting for a better organ offer, notably among candidates with MELD 35-40. Providers should consider these benefits as they evaluate OLD graft offers.

Assessment of Trends in Transplantation of Liver Grafts From Older Donors and Outcomes in Recipients of Liver Grafts From Older Donors, 2003-2016

Importance

In light of the growing population of older adults in the United States, older donors (aged ≥70 years) represent an expansion of the donor pool; however, their organs are underused. Liver grafts from older donors were historically associated with poor outcomes and higher discard rates, but clinical protocols, organ allocation, and the donor pool have changed in the past 15 years.

Objective

To evaluate trends in demographics, discard rates, and outcomes among older liver donors and transplant recipients of livers from older donors in a large national cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prospective cohort study of 4127 liver grafts from older donors and 3350 liver-only recipients of older donor grafts and 78 990 liver grafts from younger donors (aged 18-69 years) and 64 907 liver-only recipients of younger donor grafts between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016, in the United States. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, which includes data on all transplant recipients in the United States that are submitted by members of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, was used.

Exposures

Year of liver transplant and age of liver donor.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Odds of graft discard and posttransplant outcomes of all-cause graft loss and mortality.

Results

In this study, 4127 liver grafts from older donors were recovered for liver transplant across the study period (2003-2016); 747 liver grafts from older donors were discarded, and 3350 liver grafts from older donors were used for liver-only recipients. After adjusting for donor characteristics other than age and accounting for Organ Procurement Organization-level variation, liver grafts from older donors were more likely to be discarded compared with liver grafts from younger donors in 2003-2006 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.68-2.31), 2007-2009 (aOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.17-3.01), 2010-2013 (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.68-2.46), and 2013-2016 (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.96-2.86) (P < .001 for all). Transplants of liver grafts from older donors represented a progressively lower proportion of all adult liver transplants, from 6.0% (n = 258 recipients) in 2003 to 3.2% (n = 211 recipients) in 2016 (P = .001). However, outcomes in recipients of grafts from older donors improved over time, with 40% lower graft loss risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.68; P < .001) and 41% lower mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.68; P < .001) in 2010 through 2016 vs 2003 through 2009; these results were beyond the general temporal improvements in graft loss (interaction P = .03) and mortality risk (interaction P = .04) among recipients of liver grafts from younger donors.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings show that from 2003 to 2016, liver graft loss and mortality among recipients of liver grafts from older donors improved; however, liver graft discard from older donors remained increased and the number of transplants performed with liver grafts from older donors decreased. Expansion of the donor pool through broader use of liver grafts from older donors might be reasonable.

Minimizing Risk Associated With Older Liver Donors by Matching to Preferred Recipients: A National Registry and Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Allografts from older liver donors (OLDs), 70 years or older are often discarded for fear of inferior outcomes. We previously identified "preferred recipients" who did not suffer the higher risk of graft loss and mortality associated with OLDs. Preferred recipients were first-time, non-status 1 registrants older than 45 years, body mass index less than 35, indication other than hepatitis C, and cold ischemia time less than 8 hours.

METHODS

We assessed the validity of the preferred recipient construct in a larger, more recent cohort (38 891 patients, 2006-2013). We compared recipients of OLD grafts to recipients of average liver donors (ALDs, age = 40-69) and ideal liver donors (ILDs, age = 18-39) grafts using multilevel Cox regression adjusting for recipient and transplant factors.

RESULTS

The use of OLD grafts in preferred recipients has increased from 2006 to 2013 (P = 0.02). Preferred recipients Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores ranged 6 to 40. Preferred recipients had similar 5-year all-cause graft loss (ACGL) with OLD versus ALD and ILD grafts (25.4% vs 24.5% and 21.6%). Conversely, nonpreferred recipients had higher 5-year ACGL with OLD versus ALD and ILD grafts (41.4% vs 32.9% and 25.6%). After adjustment, preferred recipients had similar graft loss with OLD versus ALD grafts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.921.081.27; P = 0.3) and ILD grafts (HR, 0.981.161.39, P = 0.09); however, nonpreferred recipients had higher ACGL risk with OLD grafts versus ALD (HR, 1.281.411.56, P < 0.001) and ILD grafts (HR, 1.501.671.86, P < 0.001). Similar trends are seen with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Because preferred recipients comprise 43.3% (n = 2916) of the current waitlist and span the full range of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, transplanted OLD allografts could be distributed without added risk of graft loss or mortality.

MicroRNA-101 inhibits autophagy to alleviate liver ischemia/reperfusion injury via regulating the mTOR signaling pathway

Liver ischemia/reperfusion injury (LIRI) is a common complication of liver surgery, and affects liver function post‑transplantation. However, the precise mechanism underlying LIRI has not yet been completely elucidated. Previous studies have demonstrated the involvement of a number of microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) in liver pathophysiology. The objective of the present study was to determine the potential function and mechanism of miR‑101‑mediated regulation of autophagy in LIRI. Compared with the sham‑treated group, a significant decrease in miR‑101 and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) expression levels following ischemia/reperfusion (IR) were observed, along with an increased number of autophagosomes (P<0.001). The exogenous overexpression of miR‑101 has been demonstrated to inhibit autophagy during the LIRI response and the levels of mTOR and phosphorylated (p)‑mTOR expression are correspondingly elevated. However, compared with the miR‑NC group, miR‑101 silencing was associated with reduced mTOR and p‑mTOR levels and increased autophagy, as indicated by the gradual increase in the levels of the microtubule‑associated protein 1 light II (LC3II). The peak levels of LC3II were observed 12 h subsequent to reperfusion, which coincided with the lowest levels of miR‑101. In addition, inhibition of autophagy by 3‑methyladenine significant enhanced the protective effect of miR‑101 against LIRI, compared with the IR group (P<0.001). Altogether, miR‑101 attenuates LIRI by inhibiting autophagy via activating the mTOR pathway.

Successful Liver Transplantation Case Report from a Deceased Donor with Sickle Cell Anemia

There is a worldwide problem of waiting time and mortality rate associated with remaining on the waiting list for a liver transplant. However, some situations have been encouraging in terms of determining appropriate recipients and expanding the donor criteria. We herein report a case of useful liver donor with sickle cell anemia for liver transplantation. Here we described a case of liver transplantation from a donor with sickle cell anemia to a recipient with hepatocellular carcinoma who was deemed to be at risk of tumor growth and at risk of being dropped from the waiting list. The literature reveals the importance of using safe donors, and we describe the benefits of using a safe, deceased liver donor with sickle cell anemia who was an adequate option for liver transplantation.

Use of hepatitis C-positive grafts in hepatitis C-negative liver transplant recipients is cost effective

BACKGROUND

The number of patients needing liver transplantation (LT) exceeds the number of available allografts. The current opioid epidemic in this country has increased the number of potential donors infected with hepatitis C (HCV).

METHODS

We assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by comparing the costs and number of liver transplants performed using HCV-positive and HCV-negative grafts into patients without HCV infection in a decision analysis model with a 1-year time horizon.

RESULTS

The use of HCV-positive grafts was found to have an ICER below $50 000 across all MELD scores. Using our baseline cohort with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 15-22, the ICER was $21 233/additional LT performed. As the MELD scores increased, the ICER decreased. Above a MELD score of 23, the use of HCV-positive grafts became cost saving (-$115 419). Our model was robust to all variables tested in the sensitivity analyses, except drug costs.

CONCLUSION

The results of our decision analysis model highlight the potential pharmacoeconomic benefit of utilizing HCV-positive grafts in LT candidates who are not infected with HCV. The use of HCV-positive grafts is at least cost effective and even cost saving in patients with MELD scores above 23.

Organ Donation Attitudes Among Individuals With Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease

Background

The need for transplantable organs drastically outweighs the supply. Misconceptions are a barrier to increasing the rate of donor registration. Individuals with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) may incorrectly believe they are unable to be donors; however, their attitudes have not been studied. This study aims to explore beliefs of individuals with stage 5 CKD about their ability to donate and test the validity of an organ donation scale.

Methods

We examined the psychometric properties of a new 25-item organ donation scale among 554 patients with stage 5 CKD at 12 dialysis units in southeast Michigan. Patients completed surveys during dialysis treatment with assistance from a program coordinator or social worker.

Results

Two subscales with good psychometric properties were identified: general benefits (α = 0.86) and general barriers (α = 0.80). For both subscales, more positive attitudes were associated with higher intent to sign up on the donor registry, suggesting validity of the scale.

Conclusions

Patients who were older than 60 years, white, or of higher education status reported more positive attitudes. Misconceptions about the ability of patients with stage 5 CKD to donate are common and highlight a need for education about donor eligibility. Individuals with stage 5 CKD may be able to donate organs and tissues.

Single-Center Experience Using Marginal Liver Grafts in Korea

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established therapeutic modality for patients with end-stage liver disease. The use of marginal donors has become more common worldwide due to the sharp increase in recipients, with a consequent shortage of suitable organs. We analyzed our single-center experience over the last 8 years in LT to evaluate the outcomes of using so-called "marginal donors."

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the database of all LTs performed at our institution from 2009 to 2017. Only patients undergoing deceased-donor LTs were analyzed. Marginal grafts were defined as livers from donors >60 years of age, livers from donors with serum sodium levels >155 mEq, graft steatosis >30%, livers with cold ischemia time ≥12 hours, livers from donors who were hepatitis B or C virus positive, livers recovered from donation after cardiac death, and livers split between 2 recipients. Patients receiving marginal grafts (marginal group) were compared with patients receiving standard grafts (standard group).

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients underwent deceased-donor LT. There were 55 patients in the standard group and 51 patients in the marginal group. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, underlying liver disease, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and hospital stay between the 2 groups. Although the incidence of acute cellular rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups, the incidence of early allograft dysfunction was higher in the marginal group. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall and graft (death-censored) survivals in the marginal group were 85.5%, 75%, and 69.2% and 85.9%, 83.6%, and 77.2%, respectively. Patient overall survival and graft survival (death-censored) were significantly lower in the marginal group (P = .023 and P = .048, respectively). On multivariate analysis, receiving a marginal graft (hazard ratio [HR], 4.862 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.233-19.171]; P = .024) and occurrence of postoperative complications (HR, 4.547 [95% CI, 1.279-16.168]; P = .019) were significantly associated with worse patient overall survival. Also, when factors associated with marginal graft were analyzed separately, graft steatosis >30% was independently associated with survival (HR, 5.947 [95% CI, 1.481-23.886]; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving marginal grafts showed lower but acceptable overall survival and graft survival. However, because graft steatosis >30% was independently associated with worse survival, caution must be exercised when using this type of marginal graft by weighing the risk and benefits.

Hypothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation

A finite supply of donor organs has led many transplant centers to accept marginal liver allografts with increasing frequency. These allografts may be at higher risk of primary nonfunction, early allograft dysfunction, and other recipient complications following liver transplantation. Machine perfusion preservation is an emerging technology that limits ischemia/reperfusion injury associated with preservation and may lead to improved outcomes following transplantation. Increased used of machine perfusion in liver preservation may permit an expansion of the donor pool. In this review, we examine the major clinical experience of hypothermic machine perfusion in human liver transplantation.Liver Transplantation 24 276-281 2018 AASLD.