1
|
Kim AS, Hong JS, Levine JN, Foglia C, Saldinger P, Chao SY. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols mitigate the weekend effect on length of stay following elective colectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:662-666. [PMID: 38704203 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols on the weekend effect after elective colectomies. METHODS This was a retrospective study on all elective colorectal surgeries at a single institution in New York City between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. The length of stay (LOS) by day of the week of surgery and the effect of ERAS using univariable and multivariable analyses were compared. RESULTS A total of 605 patients were included in the study. Of note, 41 cases were performed on Mondays, 197 cases were performed on Tuesdays, 45 cases were performed on Wednesdays, 187 cases were performed on Thursdays, and 135 cases were performed on Fridays. Univariate analysis showed that, for patients who did not undergo ERAS, Monday and Tuesday were significantly associated with decreased LOS (P < .001). For patients who underwent ERAS, there was no statistically significant difference in LOS (P = .06) when operated on early in the week vs later. After controlling for age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, complications, functional health status, operation type, duration of surgery, presence of ostomy, and albumin level, adhering to the ERAS protocol was significantly associated with a shorter LOS (P < .001). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that ERAS can mitigate the weekend effect on LOS. ERAS protocols may provide more structure to the expected hospital course and allow patients to reach recovery milestones earlier, facilitating discharge even by covering teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina S Kim
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States.
| | - Julie S Hong
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States
| | - Jared N Levine
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States
| | - Christopher Foglia
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | - Pierre Saldinger
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | - Steven Y Chao
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bao R, Zhang WS, Zha YF, Zhao ZZ, Huang J, Li JL, Wang T, Guo Y, Bian JJ, Wang JF. Effects of opioid-free anaesthesia compared with balanced general anaesthesia on nausea and vomiting after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079544. [PMID: 38431299 PMCID: PMC10910406 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating the adverse effects associated with opioids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of OFA on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following video-assisted thoracic surgery. DESIGN Single-centre randomised controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery were recruited from September 2021 to June 2022. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly allocated to OFA or traditional general anaesthesia with a 1:1 allocation ratio. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the incidence of PONV within 48 hours post-surgery, and the secondary outcomes included PONV severity, postoperative pain, haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia, and length of stay (LOS) in the recovery ward and hospital. RESULTS A total of 86 and 88 patients were included in the OFA and control groups, respectively. Two patients were excluded because of severe adverse events including extreme bradycardia and epilepsy-like convulsion. The incidence and severity of PONV did not significantly differ between the two groups (29 patients (33.0%) in the control group and 22 patients (25.6%) in the OFA group; relative risk 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; p=0.285). Notably, the OFA approach used was associated with an increase in heart rate (89±17 vs 77±15 beats/min, t-test: p<0.001; U test: p<0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (87±17 vs 80±13 mm Hg, t-test: p=0.003; U test: p=0.004) after trachea intubation. Conversely, the control group exhibited more median hypotensive events per patient (mean 0.5±0.8 vs 1.0±2.0, t-test: p=0.02; median 0 (0-4) vs 0 (0-15), U test: p=0.02) during surgery. Postoperative pain scores, and LOS in the recovery ward and hospital did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study findings suggest that the implementation of OFA does not effectively reduce the incidence of PONV following thoracic surgery when compared with traditional total intravenous anaesthesia. The opioid-free strategy used in our study may be associated with severe adverse cardiovascular events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2100050738.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Bao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Shi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Feng Zha
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Zhen Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Lin Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin-Jun Bian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Feng Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verma A, Bakhtiyar SS, Ali KG, Chervu N, Sakowitz S, Lee H, Benharash P. Early discharge following colectomy for colon cancer: A national perspective. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0294256. [PMID: 38363767 PMCID: PMC10871523 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although early discharge after colectomy has garnered significant interest, contemporary, large-scale analyses are lacking. OBJECTIVE The present study utilized a national cohort of patients undergoing colectomy to examine costs and readmissions following early discharge. METHODS All adults undergoing elective colectomy for primary colon cancer were identified in the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with perioperative complications or prolonged length of stay (>8 days) were excluded to enhance cohort homogeneity. Patients discharged by postoperative day 3 were classified as Early, and others as Routine. Entropy balancing and multivariable regression were used to assess the risk-adjusted association of early discharge with costs and non-elective readmissions. Importantly, we compared 90-day stroke rates to examine whether our results were influenced by preferential early discharge of healthier patients. RESULTS Of an estimated 153,996 patients, 45.5% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to Routine, the Early cohort was younger and more commonly male. Patients in the Early group more commonly underwent left-sided colectomy and laparoscopic operations. Following multivariable adjustment, expedited discharge was associated with a $4,500 reduction in costs as well as lower 30-day (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.74, p<0.001) and 90-day non-elective readmissions (AOR 0.74, p<0.001). However, among those readmitted within 90 days, Early patients were more commonly readmitted for gastrointestinal conditions (45.8 vs 36.4%, p<0.001). Importantly, both cohorts had comparable 90-day stroke rates (2.2 vs 2.1%, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS The present work represents the largest analysis of early discharge following colectomy for cancer and supports its relative safety and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Verma
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Konmal Ghazal Ali
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Sara Sakowitz
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schwenk W, Flemming S, Girona-Johannkämper M, Wendt W, Darwich I, Strey C. [Structured implementation of fast-track pathways to enhance recovery after elective colorectal resection : First results from five German hospitals]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 95:148-156. [PMID: 37947802 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01986-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal optimized perioperative management (mPOM, fast-track, enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS) leads to a significantly accelerated recovery of patients with elective colorectal resections. Nevertheless, fast-track surgery has not yet become established in everyday clinical practice in Germany. We present the results of a structured fast-track implementation in five German hospitals. METHODS Prospective data collection in the context of a 13-month structured fast-track implementation. All patients ≥ 18 years undergoing elective colorectal resection and who gave informed consent were included. After 3 months of preparation (pre-FAST), fast-track treatment was initiated and continued for 10 months (FAST). Outcome criteria were adherence to internationally recommended fast-track elements, postoperative complications, functional recovery, and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS Data from 192 pre-FAST and 529 FAST patients were analyzed. Age, sex, patient risk, location, and type of disease were not different between both groups. The FAST patients were more likely to have undergone minimally invasive surgery (82% vs. 69%). Fast-track adherence increased from 52% (35-65%) under traditional treatment to 83% (65-96%) under fast-track treatment (p < 0.01). The duration until the end of infusion treatment, removal of the bladder catheter, first bowel movement, oral solid food, regaining autonomy, suitability for discharge and postoperative length of stay were significantly lower in the FAST group. Complications, reoperations, and readmission rates did not differ. CONCLUSION Fast-track adherence rates > 75% can also be achieved in German hospitals through structured fast-track implementation and the recovery of patients can be significantly accelerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schwenk
- Gesellschaft für Optimiertes perioperatives Management, GOPOM GmbH, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
- Gesellschaft für Optimiertes Perioperatives Management GOPOPM GmbH, Oberlörickerstr. 390b, 40547, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| | - Sven Flemming
- Universitätsklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Wolfgang Wendt
- Viszeralchirurgie / Proktologie, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Ibrahim Darwich
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Marien Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Deutschland
| | - Christoph Strey
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, DRK Krankenhaus Clementinenhaus, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bohan R, Budweg J, Vose S, Sorin M. Epidural pain management in advanced gastric cancer with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e253665. [PMID: 37487651 PMCID: PMC10373680 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-253665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Presented is a case of a man in his 20s with gastric cancer with metastasis to a perineal nodule and the splenic flexure (previously resected due to acute bowel obstruction) who presented with prolonged, intermittent, inoperable bowel obstruction likely due to adhesions, exacerbated by functional ileus due to substantial opioid requirement. In an episode of obstruction during the described admission, the patient remained obstructed after more than 10 days of medical management. The patient suffered from intense abdominal distention and pain, necessitating hundreds of oral morphine equivalents daily. A ropivacaine thoracic epidural infusion was initiated, allowing decreased opioid use and relief of opioid-induced ileus contributing to his bowel obstruction. He subsequently had multiple formed bowel movements, which quickly decreased the patient's abdominal distention and immediate risk of perforation. This case explores epidurals as an underutilised approach to pain management in metastatic gastric malignancy and inoperable malignant bowel obstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley Bohan
- Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jeffery Budweg
- Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Stephen Vose
- Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Mircea Sorin
- Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng V, Wee IJY, Abdullah HR, Tan S, Tan EKW, Seow-En I. Same-day discharge (SDD) vs standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for major colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:110. [PMID: 37121985 PMCID: PMC10149457 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04408-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are well-established, resulting in improved outcomes and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS). Same-day discharge (SDD), or "hyper-ERAS", is a natural progression of ERAS. This systematic review aims to compare the safety and efficacy of SDD against conventional ERAS in colorectal surgery. METHODS The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (394793). A systematic search was performed in major databases to identify relevant articles, and a narrative systematic review was performed. Primary outcomes were readmission rates and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were operative time and blood loss, postoperative pain, morbidity, nausea or vomiting, and patient satisfaction. Risks of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS Thirteen studies were included, with five single-arm and eight comparative studies, of which one was a randomised controlled trial. This comprised a total of 38,854 patients (SDD: 1622; ERAS: 37,232). Of the 1622 patients on the SDD pathway, 1590 patients (98%) were successfully discharged within 24 h of surgery. While most studies had an overall low risk of bias, there was considerable variability in inclusion criteria, types of surgery or anaesthesia, and discharge criteria. SDD resulted in a significantly reduced postoperative LOS, without increasing risk of 30-day readmission. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative morbidity rates were comparable between both groups. Operative duration was shorter in the SDD group. Patient-reported satisfaction was high in the SDD cohort. CONCLUSION SDD protocols appear to be safe and feasible in selected patients undergoing major colorectal operations. Randomised controlled trials are necessary to further substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Zheng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - I J Y Wee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - H R Abdullah
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - S Tan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - E K W Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - I Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moonesinghe SR. The Anesthesiologist as Public Health Physician. Anesth Analg 2023; 136:675-678. [PMID: 36928152 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S Ramani Moonesinghe
- From the UCL/UCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SOuRCe), Center for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sebastian S, Segal JP, Hedin C, Pellino G, Kotze PG, Adamina M, Campmans-Kuijpers M, Davies J, de Vries AC, Casbas AG, El-Hussuna A, Juillerat P, Meade S, Millán M, Spinelli A. ECCO Topical Review: Roadmap to Optimal Peri-Operative Care in IBD. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:153-169. [PMID: 36055337 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite the advances in medical therapies, a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] require surgical intervention. This Topical Review aims to offer expert consensus practice recommendations for peri-operative care to optimize outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of IBD healthcare providers systematically reviewed aspects relevant to peri-operative care in IBD. Consensus statements were developed using Delphi methodology. RESULTS A total of 20 current practice positions were developed following systematic review of the current literature covering use of medication in the peri-operative period, nutritional assessment and intervention, physical and psychological rehabilitation and prehabilitation, and immediate postoperative care. CONCLUSION Peri-operative planning and optimization of the patient are imperative to ensure favourable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This Topical Review provides practice recommendations applicable in the peri-operative period in IBD patients undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaji Sebastian
- IBD Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Northern Hospital Epping, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Charlotte Hedin
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | - Paulo Gustavo Kotze
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná [PUCPR], Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marjo Campmans-Kuijpers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ana Gutiérrez Casbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, ISABIAL and CIBERehd, Alicante, Spain
| | - Alaa El-Hussuna
- OpenSourceResearch organisation (osrc.network), Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Pascal Juillerat
- Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Susanna Meade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Monica Millán
- General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy After Colorectal Enhanced Recovery Pathway. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e267. [PMCID: PMC10431437 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) after colorectal surgery. Background: ERP improves early outcomes after colorectal surgery; however, little is known about its influence on PROMs and on RIOT. Methods: Prospective multicenter enrollment of patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis was performed, recording variables related to patient-, institution-, procedure-level data, adherence to the ERP, and outcomes. The primary endpoints were PROMs (administered before surgery, at discharge, and 6 to 8 weeks after surgery) and RIOT after surgery for malignancy, defined as the intended oncologic treatment according to national guidelines and disease stage, administered within 8 weeks from the index operation, evaluated through multivariate regression models. Results: The study included 4529 patients, analyzed for PROMs, 1467 of which were analyzed for RIOT. Compared to their baseline preoperative values, all PROMs showed significant worsening at discharge and improvement at late evaluation. PROMs values at discharge and 6 to 8 weeks after surgery, adjusted through a generalized mixed regression model according to preoperative status and other variables, showed no association with ERP adherence rates. RIOT rates (overall 54.5%) were independently lower by aged > 69 years, ASA Class III, open surgery, and presence of major morbidity; conversely, they were independently higher after surgery performed in an institutional ERP center and by ERP adherence rates > median (69.2%). Conclusions: Adherence to the ERP had no effect on PROMs, whereas it independently influenced RIOT rates after surgery for colorectal cancer. In this prospective multicenter study performed on 4529 patients who underwent colorectal resection, adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway showed no effect on patient-reported outcomes but independently influenced the return to intended oncologic therapy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:15-40. [PMID: 36515513 PMCID: PMC9746347 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Traci L. Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy E. Miller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Benjamin D. Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joel E. Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel L. Feingold
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L. Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic
| | - Ian M. Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5-30. [PMID: 36515747 PMCID: PMC9839829 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) are dedicated to ensuring high-quality innovative patient care for surgical patients by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus as well as minimally invasive surgery. The ASCRS and SAGES society members involved in the creation of these guidelines were chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery and enhanced recovery. This consensus document was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. This clinical practice guideline represents a collaborative effort between the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and was approved by both societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Traci L Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy E Miller
- Duke University Medical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joel E Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Surgery (Colon and Rectal), 222 Piedmont #7000, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Appropriate perioperative pain control is essential to aid in patients' recovery after surgery; however, acute postsurgical pain remains poorly treated and there continues to be an overreliance on opiates. Perioperative pain control starts in the operating room, and opiate-free anesthesia (OFA), where no opiates are used intraoperatively, has been proposed as a feasible strategy to further minimize opiates in the perioperative period. In this article, we address the potential benefits and shortcomings of OFA, while exploring tools available to accomplish multimodal anesthesia and ideally OFA, and the evidence behind the techniques proposed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Pook M, Elhaj H, El Kefraoui C, Balvardi S, Pecorelli N, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Construct validity and responsiveness of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) as a measure of recovery after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8490-8497. [PMID: 35212822 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09145-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Returning to preoperative levels of physical function is highly valued by patients recovering from surgery. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI, a 12-item questionnaire) may be a simple yet robust tool to assess postoperative recovery of functional capacity. This study assessed construct validity and responsiveness of the DASI as a measure of recovery after colorectal surgery. METHODS Data from a trial on early mobilization after colorectal surgery were analyzed. Patients completed the DASI questionnaire preoperatively and at postoperative weeks (POW) 2 and 4. Construct validity was assessed by testing the primary a priori hypotheses that postoperative DASI scores (1) are higher in patients without vs with postoperative complications and (2) correlate with six-minute walk test distance (6MWD). Exploratory analyses assessed the association between DASI scores and (1) preoperative physical status [higher (ASA ≤ 2) vs lower (ASA > 2)], (2) stoma creation (no stoma vs stoma), (3) age [younger (≤ 75 years) vs older (> 75 years)], (4) time to readiness for discharge [shorter (≤ 4 days) vs longer (> 4 days)], and (5) surgical approach (laparoscopic vs open). Responsiveness was assessed by testing a priori hypotheses that DASI scores are higher (1) preoperatively vs at POW2 and (2) at POW4 vs POW2. Mean differences in DASI scores were obtained using linear regression. The association between DASI and 6MWD was assessed via Pearson correlation. RESULTS We analyzed data from 100 patients undergoing colorectal surgery (mean age 65; 57% male; 81% laparoscopic). Mean DASI scores were 47.9 ± 12.1 preoperatively, 22.4 ± 12.7 at POW2, and 33.2 ± 15.7 at POW4. The data supported our two primary construct validity hypotheses, as well as 3/5 exploratory hypotheses. Both responsiveness hypotheses were supported. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support that the DASI questionnaire can be a useful tool to assess postoperative recovery of functional capacity in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makena Pook
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Hiba Elhaj
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Charbel El Kefraoui
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Saba Balvardi
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicolo Pecorelli
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, R2-104, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Oodit R, Biccard BM, Panieri E, Alvarez AO, Sioson MRS, Maswime S, Thomas V, Kluyts HL, Peden CJ, de Boer HD, Brindle M, Francis NK, Nelson G, Gustafsson UO, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation. World J Surg 2022; 46:1826-1843. [PMID: 35641574 PMCID: PMC9154207 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06587-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline for primary and secondary hospitals in low-middle-income countries (LMIC's) for elective abdominal and gynecologic care. METHODS The ERAS LMIC Guidelines group was established by the ERAS® Society in collaboration with different representatives of perioperative care from LMIC's. The group consisted of seven members from the ERAS® Society and eight members from LMIC's. An updated systematic literature search and evaluation of evidence from previous ERAS® guidelines was performed by the leading authors of the Colorectal (2018) and Gynecologic (2019) surgery guidelines (Gustafsson et al in World J Surg 43:6592-695, Nelson et al in Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(4):651-668). Meta-analyses randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies from both HIC's and LMIC's were considered for each perioperative item. The members in the LMIC group then applied the current evidence and adapted the recommendations for each intervention as well as identifying possible new items relevant to LMIC's. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) methodology was used to determine the quality of the published evidence. The strength of the recommendations was based on importance of the problem, quality of evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, acceptability to key stakeholders, cost of implementation and specifically the feasibility of implementing in LMIC's and determined through discussions and consensus. RESULTS In addition to previously described ERAS® Society interventions, the following items were included, revised or discussed: the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), preoperative routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in countries with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS (CD4 and viral load for those patients that are HIV positive), delirium screening and prevention, COVID 19 screening, VTE prophylaxis, immuno-nutrition, prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a standardized postoperative monitoring guideline. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines are seen as a starting point to address the urgent need to improve perioperative care and to effect data-driven, evidence-based care in LMIC's.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Oodit
- Division of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Bruce M. Biccard
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Eugenio Panieri
- Division of General Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Adrian O. Alvarez
- Anesthesia Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Teniente General Juan Domingo Peron, 4190, C1199ABB Beunos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marianna R. S. Sioson
- Head Section of Medical Nutrition, Department of Medicine and ERAS Team, The Medical City, Ortigas Avenue, Manila, Metro Manila Philippines
| | - Salome Maswime
- Division of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Viju Thomas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Francie Van Zyl Drive, Parow, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Hyla-Louise Kluyts
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, Molotlegi Street, P.O. Box 60, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, 0204 Gauteng South Africa
| | - Carol J. Peden
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Hans D. de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mary Brindle
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, London, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Canada
- Safe Systems, Ariadne Labs, Stockholm, USA
- EQuIS Research Platform, Orebro, Canada
| | - Nader K. Francis
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science- UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2 Canada
| | - Ulf O. Gustafsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Entrevägen 2, 19257 Stockholm, Danderyd Sweden
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- School of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oliver CM, Warnakulasuriya S, McGuckin D, Singleton G, Martin P, Santos C, Bedford J, Wagstaff D, Sahni A, Gilhooly D, Wilson J, Edwards K, Baumber R, Vindrola-Padros C, Dorey J, Leeman I, Boyd-Carson H, Vohra R, Singh P, Bedford M, Vallance A, Aresu G, Tucker O, Swart M, Mythen MG, Moonesinghe SR. Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129:114-126. [PMID: 35568508 PMCID: PMC9284668 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery pathways are associated with improved postoperative outcomes. However, as enhanced recovery pathways have become more complex and varied, compliance has reduced. The 'DrEaMing' bundle re-prioritises early postoperative delivery of drinking, eating, and mobilising. We investigated relationships between DrEaMing compliance, postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications in a prospective multicentre major surgical cohort. METHODS We interrogated the UK Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme dataset. Analyses were conducted in four stages. In an exploratory cohort, we identified independent predictors of DrEaMing. We quantified the association between delivery of DrEaMing (and its component variables) and prolonged LOS in a homogenous colorectal subgroup and assessed generalisability in multispecialty patients. Finally, LOS and complications were compared across hospitals, stratified by DrEaMing compliance. RESULTS The exploratory cohort comprised 22 218 records, the colorectal subgroup 7230, and the multispecialty subgroup 5713. DrEaMing compliance was 59% (13 112 patients), 60% (4341 patients), and 60% (3421), respectively, but varied substantially between hospitals. Delivery of DrEaMing predicted reduced odds of prolonged LOS in colorectal (odds ratio 0.51 [0.43-0.59], P<0.001) and multispecialty cohorts (odds ratio 0.47 [0.41-0.53], P<0.001). At the hospital level, complications were not the primary determinant of LOS after colorectal surgery, but consistent delivery of DrEaMing was associated with significantly shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS Delivery of bundled and unbundled DrEaMing was associated with substantial reductions in postoperative LOS, independent of the effects of confounder variables. Consistency of process delivery, and not complications, predicted shorter hospital-level length of stay. DrEaMing may be adopted by perioperative health systems as a quality metric to support improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M Oliver
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Samantha Warnakulasuriya
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - Dermot McGuckin
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - Georgina Singleton
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - Peter Martin
- Department for Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cristel Santos
- Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - James Bedford
- Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - Duncan Wagstaff
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - Arun Sahni
- Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - David Gilhooly
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | | | - Kylie Edwards
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | - Rachel Baumber
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK; Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK
| | | | | | - Hannah Boyd-Carson
- East Midlands Surgical Academic Network, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; Department of General Surgery, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Ravi Vohra
- East Midlands Surgical Academic Network, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pritam Singh
- Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Matthew Bedford
- Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Giuseppe Aresu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olga Tucker
- Division of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Swart
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK
| | - Monty G Mythen
- University College London Hospitals National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Suneetha R Moonesinghe
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK; University College London Hospitals National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Catarci M, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Borghi F, Garulli G, Baldazzi G, Marini P, Sica G. ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3965-3984. [PMID: 34519893 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08717-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs influence morbidity rates and length of stay after colorectal surgery (CRS), and may also impact major complications and anastomotic leakage rates. A prospective multicenter observational study to investigate the interactions between ERAS program adherence and early outcomes after elective CRS was carried out. METHODS Prospective enrolment of patients submitted to elective CRS with anastomosis in 18 months. Adherence to 21 items of ERAS program was measured upon explicit criteria in every case. After univariate analysis, independent predictors of primary endpoints [major morbidity (MM) and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates] were identified through logistic regression analyses including all significant variables, presenting odds ratios (OR). RESULTS Institutional ERAS protocol was declared by 27 out of 38 (71.0%) participating centers. Median overall adherence to ERAS program items was 71.4%. Among 3830 patients included in the study, MM and AL rates were 4.7% and 4.2%, respectively. MM rates were independently influenced by intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 7.79, 95% CI 5.46-11.10; p < 0.0001) and standard anesthesia protocol (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p = 0.028). AL rates were independently influenced by male gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.07; p = 0.021), intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.93-6.50; p < 0.0001) and non-standard resections (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.22; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS This study disclosed wide room for improvement in compliance to several ERAS program items. It failed to detect any significant association between institutionalization and/or adherence rates to ERAS program with primary endpoints. These outcomes were independently influenced by gender, intra- and postoperative blood transfusions, non-standard resections, and standard anesthesia protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, "C. E G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy. .,General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
McAtee EE, Talukder AM, Davenport DL, Bhakta AS, Patel JA. A Review of Quality Improvement Process Measures for Colorectal Surgery in the United States Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database - Have We Made Progress? Am Surg 2022:31348221101523. [PMID: 35537489 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221101523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Numerous guidelines have been published regarding Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP) following colorectal surgery over the past decade. Participation in these guidelines at a national level is unclear. We hypothesize that the adaptation of ERP for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery is limited but the use of quality improvement measures has increased and while outcomes have improved over the past several years. A total of 86 402 patients were evaluated undergoing elective colectomy between 2013-2018 using the ACS-NSQIP database. Over a 5-year period, there was a significant increase in the use of quality improvement process measures: mechanical and oral bowel preparation and minimally invasive approach. During this time, there was a significant decrease in overall perioperative morbidities (P <.001). These encouraging results from a large national database suggest that evidence-based, quality improvement guidelines are being embraced and that overall outcomes for patients undergoing elective colectomy are improving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E McAtee
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Asif M Talukder
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Daniel L Davenport
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Avinash S Bhakta
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jitesh A Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
De Roo AC, Shubeck SP, Cain-Nielsen AH, Norton EC, Regenbogen SE. Cost Consequences of Age and Comorbidity in Accelerated Postoperative Discharge After Colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:758-766. [PMID: 35394941 PMCID: PMC8994054 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective payment models have incentivized reductions in length of stay after surgery. The benefits of abbreviated postoperative hospitalization could be undermined by increased readmissions or postacute care use, particularly for older adults or those with comorbid conditions. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospitals with accelerated postsurgical discharge accrue total episode savings or incur greater postdischarge payments among patients stratified by age and comorbidity. DESIGN This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING National data from the 100% Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files for July 2012 to June 2015 were used. PATIENTS We included Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective colectomy and stratified the cohort by age (65-69, 70-79, ≥80 y) and Elixhauser comorbidity score (low: ≤0; medium: 1-5; and high: >5). Patients were categorized by the hospital's mode length of stay, reflecting "usual" care. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES In a multilevel model, we compared mean total episode payments and components thereof among age and comorbidity categories, stratified by hospital mode length of stay. RESULTS Among 88,860 patients, mean total episode payments were lower in shortest versus longest length of stay hospitals across all age and comorbidity strata and were similar between age groups (65-69 y: $28,951 vs $30,566, p = 0.014; 70-79 y: $31,157 vs $32,044, p = 0.073; ≥80 y: $33,779 vs $35,771, p = 0.005) but greater among higher comorbidity (low: $23,107 vs $24,894, p = 0.001; medium: $30,809 vs $32,282, p = 0.038; high: $44,097 vs $46641, p < 0.001). Postdischarge payments were similar among length-of-stay hospitals by age (65-69 y: ∆$529; 70-79 y: ∆$291; ≥80 y: ∆$872, p = 0.25) but greater among high comorbidity (low: ∆$477; medium: ∆$480; high: ∆$1059; p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS Administrative data do not capture patient-level factors that influence postacute care use (preference, caregiver availability). CONCLUSIONS Hospitals achieving shortest length of stay after surgery accrue lower total episode payments without a compensatory increase in postacute care spending, even among patients at oldest age and with greatest comorbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B624. CONSECUENCIAS DE LA EDAD Y LAS COMORBILIDADES ASOCIADAS, EN EL COSTO DE LA ATENCIN EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A COLECTOMA EN PROGRAMAS DE ALTA POSOPERATORIA ACELERADA ANTECEDENTES:Los modelos de pago prospectivo, han sido un incentivo para reducir la estancia hospitalaria después de la cirugía. Los beneficios de una hospitalización posoperatoria "abreviada" podrían verse afectados por un aumento en los reingresos o en la necesidad de cuidados postoperatorios tempranos luego del periodo agudo, particularmente en los adultos mayores o en aquellos con comorbilidades.OBJETIVO:Determinar si los hospitales que han establecido protocolos de alta posoperatoria "acelerada" generan un ahorro en cada episodio de atención o incurren en mayores gastos después del alta, entre los pacientes estratificados por edad y por comorbilidades.DISEÑO:Estudio transversal retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Revisión a partir de la base de datos nacional del 100% de los archivos del Medicare Provider Analysis and Review desde julio de 2012 hasta junio de 2015.PACIENTES:Se incluye a los beneficiarios de Medicare a quienes se les practicó una colectomía electiva. La cohorte se estratificó por edad (65-69 años, 70-79, ≥80) y por la puntuación de comorbilidad de Elixhauser (baja: ≤0; media: 1-5; y alta: > 5). Los pacientes se categorizaron de acuerdo con la modalidad de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria del hospital, lo que representa lo que se considera es una atención usual para dicho centro.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:En un modelo multinivel, comparamos la media de los pagos por episodio y los componentes de los mismos, entre las categorías de edad y comorbilidad, estratificados por la modalidad de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria.RESULTADOS:En los 88,860 pacientes, los pagos promedio por episodio fueron menores en los hospitales con una modalidad de estancia más corta frente a los de mayor duración, en todos los estratos de edad y comorbilidad, y fueron similares entre los grupos de edad (65-69: $28,951 vs $30,566, p = 0,014; 70-79: $31,157 vs $32,044, p = 0,073; ≥ 80 $33,779 vs $35,771, p = 0,005), pero mayor entre los pacientes con comorbilidades más altas (baja: $23,107 vs $24,894, p = 0,001; media $30,809 vs $32,282, p = 0,038; alta: $44,097 vs $46,641, p <0,001). Los pagos generados luego del alta hospitalaria fueron similares con relación a la estancia hospitalaria de los diferentes hospitales con respecto a la edad (65-69 años: ∆ $529; 70-79 años: ∆ $291; ≥80 años: ∆ $872, p = 0,25), pero mayores en aquellos con más alta comorbilidad (baja ∆ $477, medio ∆ $480, alto ∆ $1059, p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Las bases de datos administrativas no capturan los factores del paciente que influyen en el cuidado luego del estado posoperatorio agudo (preferencia, disponibilidad del proveedor del cuidado).CONCLUSIONES:Los hospitales que logran una estancia hospitalaria más corta después de la cirugía, acumulan pagos más bajos por episodio, sin un incremento compensatorio del gasto en la atención pos-aguda, incluso entre pacientes de mayor edad y con mayor comorbilidad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B624. (Traducción-Dr Eduardo Londoño-Schimmer).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C. De Roo
- University of Michigan Center for Health Outcomes and Policy
- University of Michigan Department of Surgery
| | - Sarah P. Shubeck
- University of Michigan Center for Health Outcomes and Policy
- University of Michigan Department of Surgery
| | - Anne H. Cain-Nielsen
- University of Michigan Center for Health Outcomes and Policy
- University of Michigan Department of Surgery
| | - Edward C. Norton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Scott E. Regenbogen
- University of Michigan Center for Health Outcomes and Policy
- University of Michigan Department of Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mariano ER, McCartney CJL. Regional anesthesia and enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: are we asking the right questions? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47:279-281. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
20
|
Weed CN, Bernier GV, Christante DH, Feldmann T, Flum DR, Kaplan JA, Moonka R, Thirlby RC, Simianu VV. Evaluating variation in enhanced recovery for colorectal surgery: a report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:111-119. [PMID: 34610205 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM Robust data demonstrate that enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) decrease length of stay, complications and cost. However, little is known about the reasons for variation in compliance with ERPs. The aim of this work was to confirm the efficacy of ERPs in a regional network, and to determine factors that are associated with ERP delivery in diverse hospital settings. METHOD A prospective cohort of patients was created by recording all elective colorectal operations at hospitals in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP). The delivery of 12 ERP components was tracked at all sites, and factors associated with ERP component delivery and affecting outcomes were reported. RESULTS From 2016 to 2019, 9274 elective colorectal operations were performed at 36 hospitals. Indications were 48% cancer, 23% diverticulitis and 8% inflammatory bowel disease. Minimally invasive surgery was used in 71%. The proportion of cases with six or more ERP components received increased from 23% in 2016 to 50% in 2019. An increase in components was associated with a shorter length of stay and fewer combined adverse events and reinterventions. Further, increasing numbers of ERP components provided an incremental benefit to patients even when delivered in a low-volume centre or by a low-volume surgeon, and regardless of patient presentation. CONCLUSION At SCOAP hospitals, the delivery of increasing numbers of ERP components was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and decreased complications after elective colorectal surgery. The variation in delivery of these evidence-based components in subsets of our cohort indicates an important opportunity for quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina N Weed
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Greta V Bernier
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Clinic, University of Washington Medicine - Valley Medical Center, Renton, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - David R Flum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jennifer A Kaplan
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ravi Moonka
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Richard C Thirlby
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Vlad V Simianu
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takchi R, Cos H, Williams GA, Woolsey C, Hammill CW, Fields RC, Strasberg SM, Hawkins WG, Sanford DE. Enhanced recovery pathway after open pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces postoperative length of hospital stay without reducing composite length of stay. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:65-71. [PMID: 34183246 PMCID: PMC9446414 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE There is no data regarding the impact of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) on composite length of stay (CLOS) after procedures with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS Patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy before and after implementation of ERP were prospectively followed for 90 days after surgery and complications were severity graded using the Modified Accordion Grading System. A retrospective analysis of patient outcomes were compared before and after instituting ERP. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare ERP patient outcomes to those of matched pre-ERP patients. CLOS is defined as postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) plus readmission length of hospital stay within 90 days after surgery. RESULTS 494 patients underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy - 359 pre-ERP and 135 ERP. In a 1:1 propensity-score-matched analysis of 110 matched pairs, ERP patients had significantly decreased superficial surgical site infections (5.5% vs 15.5% p = 0.015) and significantly increased rates of urinary retention (29.1% vs 7.3% p < 0.0001) compared to matched pre-ERP patients. However, overall complication rate and 90-day readmission rate were not significantly different between matched groups. Propensity score-matched ERP patients had significantly decreased PLOS (7 days vs 8 days p = 0.046) compared to matched pre-ERP patients, but CLOS was not significantly different (9 days vs 9.5 days p = 0.615). CONCLUSION ERP may reduce PLOS but might not impact the total postoperative time spent in the hospital (i.e. CLOS) within 90 days after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rony Takchi
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Heidy Cos
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gregory A Williams
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Cheryl Woolsey
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chet W Hammill
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Steven M Strasberg
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William G Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dominic E Sanford
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rollins KE, Lobo DN, Joshi GP. Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current status and future progress. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021; 35:479-489. [PMID: 34801211 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways were first introduced almost a quarter of a century ago and represent a paradigm shift in perioperative care that reduced postoperative complications and hospital length of stay, improved postoperative quality of life, and reduced overall healthcare costs. Gradual recognition of the generalizability of the interventions and transferable improvements in postoperative outcomes, led them to become standard of care for several surgical procedures. In this article, we critically review the current status of ERAS pathways, address related controversies, and propose measures for future progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie E Rollins
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dileep N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
An overview of the evidence for enhanced recovery. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2021.100826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
24
|
|
25
|
Teng CY, Myers S, Kenkre TS, Doney L, Tsang WL, Subramaniam K, Esper SA, Holder-Murray J. Targets for Intervention? Preoperative Predictors of Postoperative Ileus After Colorectal Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Protocol. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2065-2075. [PMID: 33205308 PMCID: PMC8126638 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus occurs in up to 30% of colorectal surgery patients and is associated with increased length of stay, costs, and morbidity. While Enhanced Recovery Protocols seek to accelerate postoperative recovery, data on modifiable preoperative factors associated with postoperative ileus in this setting are limited. We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of postoperative ileus following colorectal surgery in Enhanced Recovery Protocols, to determine new intervention targets. METHODS We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent colorectal surgery via Enhanced Recovery Protocols (7/2015-7/2017). Postoperative ileus was defined as nasogastric tube insertion postoperatively or nil-per-os by postoperative day 4. Preoperative risk factors including comorbidities and medication use were identified using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS Of 530 patients, 14.9% developed postoperative ileus. On univariate analysis of perioperative and postoperative factors, postoperative ileus patients had increased psychiatric illness, antidepressant and antipsychotic use, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, ileostomy creation, postoperative opioid use, complications, surgery duration, and length of stay (p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression model for preoperative factors identified psychiatric illness, preoperative antipsychotic use, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥ 3 as significant predictors of postoperative ileus (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION Postoperative ileus remains a common complication following colorectal surgery under Enhanced Recovery Protocols. Patients with pre-existing psychiatric comorbidities and preoperative antipsychotic use may be a previously overlooked cohort at increased risk for postoperative ileus. Additional research and preoperative interventions within Enhanced Recovery Protocols to reduce postoperative ileus for this higher-risk population are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Y. Teng
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sara Myers
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Tanya S. Kenkre
- University of Pittsburgh Epidemiology Data Center Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Luke Doney
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Wai Lok Tsang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Kathirvel Subramaniam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA
| | - Stephen A. Esper
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA
| | - Jennifer Holder-Murray
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA,Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Regenbogen SE, Cain-Nielsen AH, Syrjamaki JD, Norton EC. Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery Dissemination in Michigan Hospitals. Ann Surg 2021; 274:199-205. [PMID: 33351489 PMCID: PMC8211908 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate real-world effects of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) dissemination on clinical and economic outcomes after colectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Hospitals aiming to accelerate discharge and reduce spending after surgery are increasingly adopting perioperative ERPs. Despite their efficacy in specialty institutions, most studies have lacked adequate control groups and diverse hospital settings and have considered only in-hospital costs. There remain concerns that accelerated discharge might incur unintended consequences. METHODS Retrospective, population-based cohort including patients in 72 hospitals in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative clinical registry (N = 13,611) and/or Michigan Value Collaborative claims registry (N = 14,800) who underwent elective colectomy, 2012 to 2018. Marginal effects of ERP on clinical outcomes and risk-adjusted, price-standardized 90-day episode payments were evaluated using mixed-effects models to account for secular trends and hospital performance unrelated to ERP. RESULTS In 24 ERP hospitals, patients Post-ERP had significantly shorter length of stay than those Pre-ERP (5.1 vs 6.5 days, P < 0.001), lower incidence of complications (14.6% vs 16.9%, P < 0.001) and readmissions (10.4% vs 11.3%, P = 0.02), and lower episode payments ($28,550 vs $31,192, P < 0.001) and postacute care ($3,384 vs $3,909, P < 0.001). In mixed-effects adjusted analyses, these effects were significantly attenuated-ERP was associated with a marginal length of stay reduction of 0.4 days (95% confidence interval 0.2-0.6 days, P = 0.001), and no significant difference in complications, readmissions, or overall spending. CONCLUSIONS ERPs are associated with small reduction in postoperative length of hospitalization after colectomy, without unwanted increases in readmission or postacute care spending. The real-world effects across a variety of hospitals may be smaller than observed in early-adopting specialty centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott E Regenbogen
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anne H Cain-Nielsen
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - John D Syrjamaki
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Edward C Norton
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Michigan Value Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fischer CP, Knapp L, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Wick EC. Association of Enhanced Recovery Pathway Compliance With Patient Outcomes. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:982-984. [PMID: 34287618 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea P Fischer
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.,Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leandra Knapp
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark E Cohen
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Johns Hopkins Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Quality and Safety, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Boezaart AP, Smith CR, Chembrovich S, Zasimovich Y, Server A, Morgan G, Theron A, Booysen K, Reina MA. Visceral versus somatic pain: an educational review of anatomy and clinical implications. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:629-636. [PMID: 34145074 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Somatic and visceral nociceptive signals travel via different pathways to reach the spinal cord. Additionally, signals regulating visceral blood flow and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) motility travel via efferent sympathetic nerves. To offer optimal pain relief and increase GIT motility and blood flow, we should interfere with all these pathways. These include the afferent nerves that travel with the sympathetic trunks, the somatic fibers that innervate the abdominal wall and part of the parietal peritoneum, and the sympathetic efferent fibers. All somatic and visceral afferent neural and sympathetic efferent pathways are effectively blocked by appropriately placed segmental thoracic epidural blocks (TEBs), whereas well-placed truncal fascial plane blocks evidently do not consistently block the afferent visceral neural pathways nor the sympathetic efferent nerves. It is generally accepted that it would be beneficial to counter the effects of the stress response on the GIT, therefore most enhanced recovery after surgery protocols involve TEB. The TEB failure rate, however, can be high, enticing practitioners to resort to truncal fascial plane blocks. In this educational article, we discuss the differences between visceral and somatic pain, their management and the clinical implications of these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre P Boezaart
- Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA .,Lumina Pain Medicine Collaborative, Surrey, UK
| | - Cameron R Smith
- Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Yury Zasimovich
- Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Anna Server
- Anesthesiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Gwen Morgan
- Syncerus Care, George, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Andre Theron
- Syncerus Care, George, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Karin Booysen
- Private Anesthesiology Practice, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Miguel A Reina
- Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, CEU San Pablo University Faculty of Medicine, Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Liu JY, Merkow RP, Cohen ME, Bilimoria K, Ko CY, Sweeney JF, Sharma J. Association of Weekend Effect With Recovery After Surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:988-990. [PMID: 32845300 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y Liu
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ryan P Merkow
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Karl Bilimoria
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.,Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.,David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - John F Sweeney
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liu JY, Perez SD, Balch GG, Sullivan PS, Srinivasan JK, Staley CA, Sweeney J, Sharma J, Shaffer VO. Elderly Patients Benefit From Enhanced Recovery Protocols After Colorectal Surgery. J Surg Res 2021; 266:54-61. [PMID: 33984731 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS) aim to decrease physiological stress response to surgery and maintain postoperative physiological function. Proponents of ERAS state these protocols decrease lengths of stay (LOS) and complication rates. Our aim was to assess whether elderly patients receive the same benefit as younger patients using ERAS protocols. METHODS We queried patients from 2015 to 2017 at our institution with Enhanced Recovery in Surgery (ERIN) variables from the targeted colectomy NSQIP database. The patients were divided into sextiles and analyzed for readmission, LOS, return of bowel function, tolerating diet, mobilization, and multimodal pain management comparing the youngest sextile to the oldest sextile. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-two patients (73% colectomies) were enrolled in ERAS. When compared with the youngest sextile (age 19-43.8), the oldest sextile (age 71.4-92.5) had similar readmission rates at 9.8% versus 9.5% (P-value = 0.87), quicker return of bowel function, average 1.9 d versus 3.7 d (P-value < 0.01), and tolerated diet quicker, average POD 2.4 d versus 5.1 d (P-value < 0.01). There was a slight decrease in the use of multimodal pain management 88% versus 100% (P-value = 0.07), but mobilization on POD1 was slightly better in the elderly at 80% versus 78% (P-value = 0.76). Elderly patients enrolled in ERAS had an average LOS of 4.9 days versus 7.8 in the younger patients (P-value = 0.08). Among elderly non-ERAS patients average LOS was 14.6 days. CONCLUSION Overall, elderly patients fared better or the same on the ERIN variables analyzed than the younger cohort. ERAS protocols are beneficial and applicable to elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y Liu
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | | | - Glen G Balch
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | - John Sweeney
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Schwenk W, Lang I, Huhn M. [Structured Implementation of a Fast-Track Program - How Does it Work?]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:249-259. [PMID: 33782931 DOI: 10.1055/a-1385-0357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Fast-track or ERAS programs can give clinically relevant benefits for patients undergoing surgery. They also have financial advantages for the hospital. Despite these facts, fast-track has been implemented in only very few hospitals in Germany. Neither scientific evidence nor reimbursement regulations explain this lack of fast-track acceptance. It seems however that a structured process of change from traditional perioperative medicine to evidence based fast-track therapy is missing in Germany. In other countries, structured programs for fast-track or ERAS implementation have been successful in many hospitals. This article describes structured fast-track implementation divided into three consecutive steps: organisational preparation, clinical implementation and continuous examination of fast-track adherence, functional recovery, morbidity and postoperative length of hospital stay. Due to its complex nature, fast-track implementation should be guided by external fast-track experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schwenk
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Deutschland
| | - Ina Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Deutschland
| | - Marion Huhn
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Joliat GR, Hübner M, Roulin D, Demartines N. Cost Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Programs in Colorectal, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Surgery: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2020; 44:647-655. [PMID: 31664495 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05252-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have been shown to improve postoperative outcomes after abdominal surgery. This study aimed to review the current literature to assess if ERPs in colorectal, pancreas, and liver surgery induce cost savings. METHODS A systematic review was performed including prospective and retrospective studies comparing conventional management versus ERP in terms of costs. All kinds of ERP were considered (fast-track, ERAS®, or home-made protocols). Studies with no mention of a clear protocol and no reporting of protocol compliance were excluded. RESULTS Thirty-seven articles out of 144 identified records were scrutinized as full articles. Final analysis included 16 studies. In colorectal surgery, two studies were prospective (1 randomized controlled trial, RCT) and six retrospective, totaling 1277 non-ERP patients and 2078 ERP patients. Three of the eight studies showed no difference in cost savings between the two groups. The meta-analysis found a mean cost reduction of USD3010 (95% CI: 5370-650, p = 0.01) in favor of ERP. Among the five included studies in pancreas surgery (all retrospective, 552 non-ERP vs. 348 ERP patients), the mean cost reduction in favor of the ERP group was USD7020 (95% CI: 11,600-2430, p = 0.003). In liver surgery, only three studies (two retrospective and 1 RCT, 180 non-ERP vs. 197 ERP patients) were found, which precluded a sound cost analysis. CONCLUSIONS The present systematic review suggests that ERPs in colorectal and pancreas surgery are associated with cost savings compared to conventional perioperative management. Cost data in liver surgery are scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Didier Roulin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Catarci M, Benedetti M, Maurizi A, Spinelli F, Bernacconi T, Guercioni G, Campagnacci R. ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes. Updates Surg 2020; 73:123-137. [PMID: 33094366 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00885-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Although there is clear evidence that an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery leads to significantly reduced morbidity rates and length of hospital stay (LOS), it is still unclear what modalities and levels of implementation of the program are necessary to achieve these results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methods and results of the first year of structured implementation of a colorectal ERAS program in two surgical units of the Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR) Marche in Italy. A two-center observational study on a prospectively maintained database was performed on 196 consecutive colorectal resections (excluding emergencies and American Society of Anesthesiologists class > III cases) over a 1-year period. More than 50 variables including adherence to the individual items of the ERAS program were considered. Primary outcomes were overall morbidity, major morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage rates; secondary outcomes were LOS, re-admission and re-operation. The results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses through logistic regression. After a median follow-up of 39.5 days, we recorded complications in 72 patients (overall morbidity 36.7%), major complications in 14 patients (major morbidity 7.1%), 6 deaths (mortality 3.1%), anastomotic dehiscence in 9 cases (4.9%), mean overall LOS of 6.6 days, 10 readmissions (5.1%) and 13 reoperations (6.7%). The mean adherence rate to the items of the ERAS program was 85.4%, showing a significant dose-effect curve for overall and major morbidity rates, anastomotic leakage rates and LOS. The implementation methods of a colorectal ERAS program in this study led to a high adherence (> 80%) to the program items. High adherence had significant effects also on major morbidity and anastomotic leakage rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy. .,Direttore UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale "C. e G. Mazzoni"-AV5-ASUR Marche, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Angela Maurizi
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Francesco Spinelli
- Anesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Tonino Bernacconi
- Anesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Gianluca Guercioni
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Roberto Campagnacci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Byrne BE, Faiz OD, Bottle A, Aylin P, Vincent CA. A Protocol is not Enough: Enhanced Recovery Program-Based Care and Clinician Adherence Associated with Shorter Stay After Colorectal Surgery. World J Surg 2020; 45:347-355. [PMID: 33079245 PMCID: PMC7773614 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05810-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Randomised trials have shown an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) can shorten stay after colorectal surgery. Previous research has focused on patient compliance neglecting the role of care providers. National data on implementation and adherence to standardised care are lacking. We examined care organisation and delivery including the ERP, and correlated this with clinical outcomes. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to surgeons and nurses in August–October 2015. All English National Health Service Trusts providing elective colorectal surgery were invited. Responses frequencies and variation were examined. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify underlying features of care. Standardised factor scores were correlated with elective clinical outcomes of length of stay, mortality and readmission rates from 2013–15. Results 218/600 (36.3%) postal responses were received from 84/90 (93.3%) Trusts that agreed to participate. Combined with email responses, 301 surveys were analysed. 281/301 (93.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that they had a standardised, ERP-based care protocol. However, 182/301 (60.5%) indicated all consultants managed post-operative oral intake similarly. After factor analysis, higher hospital average ERP-based care standardisation and clinician adherence score were significantly correlated with reduced length of stay, as well as higher ratings of teamwork and support for complication management. Conclusions Standardised, ERP-based care was near universal, but clinician adherence varied markedly. Units reporting higher levels of clinician adherence achieved the lowest length of stay. Having a protocol is not enough. Careful implementation and adherence by all of the team is vital to achieve the best results. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-020-05810-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben E Byrne
- Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Omar D Faiz
- Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Marks Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Alex Bottle
- Dr. Foster Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Aylin
- Dr. Foster Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Charles A Vincent
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kiong KL, Vu CN, Yao CMKL, Kruse B, Zheng G, Yu P, Weber RS, Lewis CM. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: A Case-Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Pain Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:867-876. [PMID: 32964371 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09174-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are well established in certain surgical specialties because findings have shown significant improvements in outcomes. Convincing literature in head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery is lacking. This study aimed to assess the effect of an ERAS pathway on National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-based occurrences and pain-related outcomes in HNC surgery. METHODS The study matched 200 patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery on an ERAS pathway between 1 March 2016 and 31 March 2019 with control subjects (1:1 ratio) during the same period. Demographic and perioperative data collected from the NSQIP database were extracted. Pain scores and medication usage were electronically extracted from our electronic medical record system and compared. Risk factors for high opioid usage also were assessed. RESULTS Both groups were statistically similar in baseline characteristics. The ERAS group had fewer planned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (4% vs. 14%; p < 0.001), a shorter mean hospital stay (7.2 ± 2.3 vs. 8.7 ± 4.2 days; p < 0.001), and fewer overall complications (18.6% vs. 27.0%; p = 0.045). Morphine milligram equivalent requirements over 72 h were significantly reduced during 72 h in the ERAS group (138.8 ± 181.5 vs. 207.9 ± 205.5; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for high opioid analgesic usage included preoperative opioid usage, age younger than 65 years, race, patient-controlled analgesia use, and ICU admission. CONCLUSION The study findings showed that ERAS in HNC surgery can result in improved outcomes and resource use, and that these results are sustainable. The outcomes described in this report can be further used to optimize ERAS pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley L Kiong
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Catherine N Vu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher M K L Yao
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brittany Kruse
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gang Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peirong Yu
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal S Weber
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carol M Lewis
- Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital readmission rate is an important quality metric and has been recognized as a key measure of hospital value-based purchasing programs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the risk factors for hospital readmission with a focus on potentially preventable early readmissions within 48 hours of discharge. DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a tertiary academic facility with a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. PATIENTS Consecutive patients undergoing elective major colorectal resections between 2011 and 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Univariable and multivariable risk factors for overall and early (<48 hours) readmissions were identified. Specific surgical and medical reasons for readmission were compared between early and late readmissions. RESULTS In total, 526 of 4204 patients (12.5%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Independent risk factors were ASA score (≥3; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2), excess perioperative weight gain (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3), ileostomy (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1-2), and transfusion (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.4-3), or reoperation (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 7.4-17.5) during the index stay. No potentially preventable risk factor for early readmission (128 patients, 24.3% of all readmissions, 3% of total cohort) was identified, and index hospital stay of ≤3 days was not associated with increased readmission (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2). Although ileus and small-bowel obstruction (early: 43.8% vs late: 15.5%, p < 0.001) were leading causes for early readmissions, deep infections (3.9% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (0% vs 5%, p = 0.006) were mainly observed during readmissions after 48 hours. LIMITATIONS Risk of underreporting due to loss of follow-up and the potential co-occurrence of complications were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS Early hospital readmission was mainly due to ileus or bowel obstruction, whereas late readmissions were related to deep infections and acute kidney injury. A suspicious attitude toward potential ileus-related symptoms before discharge and dedicated education for ostomy patients are important. A short index hospital stay was not associated with increased readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B237. REINGRESOS DENTRO DE LAS 48 HORAS POSTERIORES AL ALTA: RAZONES, FACTORES DE RIESGO Y POSIBLES MEJORAS: La tasa de reingreso hospitalario es una métrica de calidad importante y ha sido reconocida como una medida clave de los programas hospitalarios de compras basadas en el valor.Evaluar los factores de riesgo para el reingreso hospitalario con énfasis en reingresos tempranos potencialmente prevenibles dentro de las 48 horas posteriores al alta.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Institución académica terciaria con programa de recuperación mejorada estandarizado.Pacientes consecutivos sometidos a resecciones colorrectales mayores electivas entre 2011 y 2016.Se identificaron factores de riesgo uni y multivariables para reingresos totales y tempranos (<48 horas). Se compararon razones médicas y quirúrgicas específicas para el reingreso entre reingresos tempranos y tardíos.En total, 526/4204 pacientes (12,5%) fueron readmitidos dentro de los 30 días posteriores al alta. Los factores de riesgo independientes fueron puntuación ASA (≥3, OR 1.5; IC 95% 1.1-2), aumento de peso perioperatorio excesivo (OR 1.7; IC 95% 1.3-2.3), ileostomía (OR 1.4, IC 95%: 1-2) y transfusión (OR 2, IC 95% 1.4-3) o reoperación (OR 11.4; IC 95% 7.4-17.5) durante la estadía índice. No se identificó ningún factor de riesgo potencialmente prevenible para el reingreso temprano (128 pacientes, 24.3% de todos los reingresos, 3% de la cohorte total), y la estadía hospitalaria índice de ≤ 3 días no se asoció con un aumento en el reingreso (OR 0.9; IC 95% 0.7-1.2) Mientras que el íleo / obstrucción del intestino delgado (temprano: 43.8% vs. tardío: 15.5%, p < 0.001) fueron las principales causas de reingresos tempranos, infecciones profundas (3.9% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001) y lesión renal aguda (0 vs 5%, p = 0.006) se observaron principalmente durante los reingresos después de 48 horas.Riesgo de subregistro debido a la pérdida en el seguimiento, posible co-ocurrencia de complicaciones.El reingreso hospitalario temprano se debió principalmente a íleo u obstrucción intestinal, mientras que los reingresos tardíos se relacionaron con infecciones profundas y lesión renal aguda. Es importante tener una actitud suspicaz hacia los posibles síntomas relacionados con el íleo antes del alta y una educación específica para los pacientes con ostomía. La estadía hospitalaria índice corta no se asoció con mayores tasas de reingreso. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B237.
Collapse
|
37
|
Baoas SD, Beninato T, Zenilman M, Ozuner G. Investigation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol outcome on post colectomy patients. J Perioper Pract 2020; 31:181-186. [PMID: 32600186 DOI: 10.1177/1750458920925364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was implemented to improve quality and cost effectiveness of surgical care in elective colorectal procedures. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. The ERAS protocol was initiated on 9 July 2018 and retrospectively reviewed in July 2019 by chart review, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database and risk stratification using Clavien-Dindo classification for all elective colorectal procedures. RESULTS A total of 109 patients, 55 (pre-ERAS) and 54 (post-ERAS) are included in the final analysis. There were no differences in complications were recorded (p = 0.37) and 30-day readmissions (p = 0.785). The mean hospital stay was 5.89 ± 2.62 days in pre-ERAS and 4.94 ± 2.27 days in post-ERAS group which was statistically significant (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS An ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery harmonised perioperative care and decreased length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon D Baoas
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Toni Beninato
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Michael Zenilman
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Gokhan Ozuner
- Colorectal Surgery, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Memtsoudis SG, Fiasconaro M, Soffin EM, Liu J, Wilson LA, Poeran J, Bekeris J, Kehlet H. Enhanced recovery after surgery components and perioperative outcomes: a nationwide observational study. Br J Anaesth 2020; 124:638-647. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
39
|
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
To provide a brief summary of the progress of enhanced recovery over the last 5 to 10 years and set out what the future might hold for such programmes.
Recent Findings
There has been significant progress in the adoption of enhanced recovery programmes across multiple surgical specialities. However there is still difficulty in sustaining a target of > 80% compliance, which has been identified through research as the optimal level to observe best patient results. With increasing interest in perioperative medicine and prehabilitation, more focus is being put into enhanced recovery programmes.
Summary
The evidence continues to support the use of enhanced recovery programmes to reduce patient mortality, morbidity and length of stay and therefore saving cost and resource. However more progress needs to be made in adoption and compliance to these programmes. In the future, advances in technology may aid programme implementation and data collection.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ore AS, Shear MA, Liu FW, Dalrymple JL, Awtrey CS, Garrett L, Stack-Dunnbier H, Hacker MR, Esselen KM. Adoption of enhanced recovery after laparotomy in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:122-127. [PMID: 31771963 PMCID: PMC8939246 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways combine a comprehensive set of peri-operative practices that have been demonstrated to hasten patient post-operative recovery. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of ERAS components and assess attitudes towards ERAS among gynecologic oncologists. METHODS We developed and administered a cross-sectional survey of attending, fellow, and resident physicians who were members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology in January 2018. The χ2 test was used to compare adherence to individual components of ERAS. RESULTS There was a 23% survey response rate and we analyzed 289 responses: 79% were attending physicians, 57% were from academic institutions, and 64% were from institutions with an established ERAS pathway. Respondents from ERAS institutions were significantly more likely to adhere to recommendations regarding pre-operative fasting for liquids (ERAS 51%, non-ERAS 28%; p<0.001), carbohydrate loading (63% vs 16%; p<0.001), intra-operative fluid management (78% vs 32%; p<0.001), and extended duration of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis for malignancy (69% vs 55%; p=0.003). We found no difference in the use of mechanical bowel preparation, use of peritoneal drainage, or use of nasogastric tubes between ERAS and non-ERAS institutions. Nearly all respondents (92%) felt that ERAS pathways were safe. DISCUSSION Practicing at an institution with an ERAS pathway increased adoption of many ERAS elements; however, adherence to certain guidelines remains highly variable. Use of bowel preparation, nasogastric tubes, and peritoneal drainage catheters remain common. Future work should identify barriers to the implementation of ERAS and its components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Sofia Ore
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew A Shear
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fong W Liu
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John L Dalrymple
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher S Awtrey
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leslie Garrett
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hannah Stack-Dunnbier
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michele R Hacker
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katharine McKinley Esselen
- Obstetrics and gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ripollés-Melchor J, Ramírez-Rodríguez JM, Aldecoa C. Role of Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs in Mitigating Healthcare Disparities—Reply. JAMA Surg 2020; 155:92. [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Ripollés-Melchor
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network, Zaragoza, Spain
- Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Spain Chapter, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - José M Ramírez-Rodríguez
- Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network, Zaragoza, Spain
- Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Spain Chapter, Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of General Surgery, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - César Aldecoa
- Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network, Zaragoza, Spain
- Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Spain Chapter, Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Río Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hu QL, Liu JY, Hobson DB, Cohen ME, Hall BL, Wick EC, Ko CY. Best Practices in Data Use for Achieving Successful Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Pathway. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229:626-632.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.08.1448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
43
|
McGee MF, Kreutzer L, Quinn CM, Yang A, Shan Y, Halverson AL, Love R, Johnson JK, Prachand V, Bilimoria KY. Leveraging a Comprehensive Program to Implement a Colorectal Surgical Site Infection Reduction Bundle in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative. Ann Surg 2019; 270:701-711. [PMID: 31503066 PMCID: PMC7775039 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our objective was to examine the implementation and associated clinical outcomes of a comprehensive surgical site infection (SSI) reduction bundle in a large statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative leveraging a multifaceted implementation strategy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Bundled perioperative interventions reduce colorectal SSI rates when enacted at individual hospitals, but the ability to implement comprehensive SSI bundles and to examine the resultant clinical effectiveness within a larger, diverse population of hospitals is unknown. METHODS A multifaceted SSI reduction bundle was developed and implemented in a large statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative through a novel implementation program consisting of guided implementation, data feedback, mentorship, process improvement training/coaching, and targeted-implementation toolkits. Bundle adherence and ACS NSQIP outcomes were examined preimplementation versus postimplementation. RESULTS Among 32 hospitals, there was a 2.5-fold relative increase in the proportion of patients completing at least 75% of bundle elements (preimplementation = 19.5% vs. postimplementation = 49.8%, P = 0.001). Largest adherence gains were seen in wound closure re-gowning/re-gloving (24.0% vs. 62.0%, P < 0.001), use of clean closing instruments (32.1% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.003), and preoperative chlorhexidine bathing (46.1% vs. 77.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses showed a trend toward lower risk of superficial incisional SSI in the postimplementation period compared to baseline (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-10.2, P = 0.06). As the adherence in the number of bundle elements increased, there was a significant decrease in superficial SSI rates (lowest adherence quintile, 4.6% vs. highest, 1.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive multifaceted SSI reduction bundle can be successfully implemented throughout a large quality improvement learning collaborative when coordinated quality improvement activities are leveraged, resulting in a 30% decline in SSI rates. Lower superficial SSI rates are associated with the number of adherent bundle elements a patient receives, rendering considerable benefits to institutions capable of implementing more components of the bundle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F McGee
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Lindsey Kreutzer
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Christopher M Quinn
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Anthony Yang
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ying Shan
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Amy L Halverson
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Remi Love
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Julie K Johnson
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Vivek Prachand
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Karl Y Bilimoria
- Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC), Chicago, IL
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ilyas S, Simmons S, Bampoe S. Systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols for elective caesarean section versus conventional care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 59:767-776. [DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sajidah Ilyas
- Department of Anaesthesia Mercy Hospital for Women MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Scott Simmons
- Department of Anaesthesia Mercy Hospital for Women MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Sohail Bampoe
- Centre for Perioperative Medicine University College London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer offers many potential benefits, but as with any new technology, there is a learning curve. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify trends in the uptake of robotic resection and associated complication rates. DESIGN This was a case sequence analysis of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer. SETTINGS The study was conducted using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperation System database. PATIENTS Adults undergoing colorectal resection for cancer from 2008 through 2016 were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative database. Case sequence analysis was used to describe surgeon experience, with cases grouped into quartiles based on the chronological order in which each surgeon performed them. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes included in-hospital major events (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, shock, and death) and iatrogenic complications. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the relationship between case sequence and operative outcomes. RESULTS A total of 2763 robotic procedures were included, with volume increasing from 76 cases in 2010 to 702 cases in 2015. The proportion of cases performed by surgeons earliest in their learning curve has increased to 18.2% in 2015. This quartile was composed of more black patients (11.4% earliest quartile vs 7.0% latest quartile; p < 0.001) and rectal resections (50.1% earliest quartile vs 38.9% latest quartile; p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, major complications did not improve with increasing case sequence. However, with increasing cumulative surgeon case sequence iatrogenic complications were reduced, particularly in the highest volume quartile (OR = 0.29 (95% CI, 0.09-0.88); p = 0.03). Odds of prolonged length of stay (>75 percentile) were also decreased (OR = 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37-0.69); p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS Data were derived from an administrative database. CONCLUSIONS Robotic colorectal resection has been rapidly adopted. Surgeons earliest in their experience have increased iatrogenic complications and continue to make up a large proportion of cases performed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A974. ANÁLISIS DE SECUENCIA DE CASOS DE LA CURVA DE APRENDIZAJE DE RESECCIÓN ROBÓTICA COLORRECTAL: La cirugía robótica para el cáncer colorrectal ofrece muchos beneficios potenciales, pero como con cualquier nueva tecnología, presenta una importante curva de aprendizaje. OBJETIVO Se buscó identificar tendencias en la aceptación de la resección robótica y las tasas de complicaciones asociadas. DISEÑO:: Análisis de secuencia de casos de cirugía robótica para cáncer colorrectal AJUSTES:: Base de datos del Sistema de Cooperación para la Investigación y la Planificación del Estado de Nueva York. PACIENTES Los adultos que se sometieron a una resección colorrectal en caso de cáncer desde 2008 hasta 2016 se identificaron en la base de datos de la Cooperativa de Investigación y Planificación del Estado de Nueva York. Se utilizó un análisis de secuencia de casos para describir la experiencia del cirujano, y los casos se agruparon en cuartiles según el orden cronológico en el que cada cirujano los operó. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES Los resultados incluyeron los eventos intrahospitalarios mayores (infarto de miocardio, embolia pulmonar, shock y muerte) y las complicaciones iatrogénicas. Se utilizaron modelos lineales generalizados mixtos para estimar la relación entre la secuencia de casos y los resultados operativos. RESULTADOS Se incluyeron un total de 2.763 procedimientos robóticos, con un aumento del volumen de 76 casos en 2010 a 702 casos en 2015. La proporción de casos realizados por cirujanos en su primera curva de aprendizaje aumentó a 18.2% en 2015. Este cuartil estaba compuesto por una mayoría de pacientes de color (11.4% en el cuartil más temprano versus 7.0% en el último cuartil, p < 0.001) y de resecciones rectales (50.1% en el primer cuartil vs 38.9% en el último cuartil, p < 0.001). En el ajuste del análisis, las complicaciones mayores no mejoraron al aumentar la secuencia de casos. Sin embargo, al aumentar la secuencia acumulada de casos de cirujanos, se redujeron las complicaciones iatrogénicas, particularmente en el cuartil de mayor volumen (OR = 0,29; IC del 95%: 0,09 a 0,88; p = 0,03). Las probabilidades de una estadía hospitalaria prolongada (> percentil 75) también disminuyeron (OR 0,50; IC del 95%: 0,37 a 0,69; p < 0,001). LIMITACIONES Los valores fueron derivados desde una base de datos administrativa. CONCLUSIONES La resección colorrectal robótica ha sido adoptada rápidamente. Los cirujanos durante su experiencia inicial han presentado un elevado número de complicaciones iatrogénicas y éstas representan todavía, una gran proporción de casos realizados. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A974.
Collapse
|
46
|
Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2019; 33:259-267. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
47
|
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) following colorectal surgery is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, longer length of stay, and higher rates of readmission. SSI rates have been established as a surrogate metric for the overall quality of surgical care and are intricately tied to financial incentives and the public reputation of an institution. While risk factors and prevention mechanisms for SSI are well established, the rates of SSI remain high. This article discusses the clinical and economic impact of SSI and strategies for mitigating the risk of SSI through bundled prevention practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Turner
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John Migaly
- Division of Advanced GI and Oncologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Memtsoudis SG, Poeran J, Kehlet H. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in the United States: From Evidence-Based Practice to Uncertain Science? JAMA 2019; 321:1049-1050. [PMID: 30816910 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.1070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros G Memtsoudis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jashvant Poeran
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA, Taylor JS, Iniesta M, Lasala J, Mena G, Scott M, Gillis C, Elias K, Wijk L, Huang J, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:651-668. [PMID: 30877144 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 391] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the first updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery. METHODS A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed. Studies on each item within the ERAS gynecologic/oncology protocol were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. CONCLUSIONS The updated evidence base and recommendation for items within the ERAS gynecologic/oncology perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregg Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jamie Bakkum-Gamez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eleftheria Kalogera
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gretchen Glaser
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alon Altman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jolyn S Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Iniesta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Javier Lasala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gabriel Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Scott
- Department of Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Chelsia Gillis
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kevin Elias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lena Wijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jeffrey Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Oak Hill Hospital, Brooksville, Florida, USA
| | - Jonas Nygren
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, Ersta Hospital and Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pecorelli N, Balvardi S, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Does adherence to perioperative enhanced recovery pathway elements influence patient-reported recovery following colorectal resection? Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3806-3815. [PMID: 30701367 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06684-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are pivotal to promote patient-centered perioperative care. Adherence to enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) is associated with improved clinical outcomes (i.e., morbidity, length of stay), but the impact of adherence on PROMs is uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which adherence to an ERP for colorectal surgery is associated with postoperative recovery as assessed using PROMs. METHODS AND PROCEDURES 100 patients were included [median age 63 (IQR 50-71) years, 81 laparoscopic, 37 rectal surgery]. Overall adherence to the ERP and adherence to specific ERP elements were analyzed. Adjusted linear regression was used to evaluate the association of adherence with PROMs assessing early recovery [Abdominal surgery impact scale (ASIS) and Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) on POD2] and late recovery (Duke Activity Status Index, RAND-36 Physical and Mental Summary Scores, Life-Space Mobility Assessment at 4 weeks after surgery). Missing data were addressed using multiple imputations. RESULTS Median adherence to the ERP was 80% (16/20 elements, IQR 70-90%). Overall adherence was associated with ASIS scores on POD2 (4% increase per additional element, 95% CI 1-8%; p = 0.018). When specific ERP elements were analyzed, ASIS scores were associated with adherence to PONV prophylaxis (34% increase, 95% CI 5-63%; p = 0.023) and early solid food diet (20% increase, 95% CI 5-35%; p = 0.009). MFI General fatigue and MFI Mental fatigue scores on POD2 were associated with adherence to PONV prophylaxis (36% decrease, 95% CI - 64 to - 8%, p = 0.014 and 22% decrease, 95% CI - 44 to - 8%, p = 0.042). Overall adherence and adherence to specific elements were not associated with PROMs at 4 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that, from the perspective of patients, adherence to an ERP for colorectal surgery impacts early, but not late postoperative recovery. This result may reflect the lack of PROMs able to validly measure postoperative recovery beyond hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Pecorelli
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Saba Balvardi
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - A Sender Liberman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Charlebois
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Barry Stein
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.,Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|