Information transfer and communication in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2010;252:225-239. [PMID: 20647929 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181e495c2]

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based, patient-centred perioperative patient safety recommendations: a European consensus study☆

BACKGROUND

Surgery-related adverse events are among the most common adverse events in-hospital. However, no comprehensive, multidisciplinary perioperative guidelines exist at the European level. The aim of this study is to describe the process and results in achieving European multidisciplinary consensus on perioperative patient safety recommendations.

METHODS

This multimethod study included: (1) a systematic review of guidelines; (2) selection and synthesis of recommendations; and (3) a two-round modified Delphi technique including a 2-day face-to-face consensus conference. We recruited a panel of two expert groups balanced in terms of gender, geographical origin, and professional background, with meaningful participation from patient representatives. Consensus was defined as at least 70% of the panel rating a recommendation 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale for importance to patient safety and feasibility of implementation.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 267 guidelines, from which 4666 patient safety recommendations were identified and extracted. After four synthesis rounds, 99 recommendations were presented for the Delphi survey, detailing their strength of recommendation, level of evidence, and methodological quality of the cited guidelines. An expert group, composed of 66 multidisciplinary experts from 19 European countries, participated with a response rate of 80.3%. After the two Delphi rounds and the consensus conference, the panel agreed on a final set of 101 recommended perioperative patient safety practices.

CONCLUSIONS

A set of 101 comprehensive, evidence-based, patient-centred perioperative patient safety practices was developed through a European consensus process to improve the quality of care in healthcare facilities across Europe and beyond.

Enhancing patient safety: identifying fall risks during patient transfers in operating rooms

BACKGROUND

Transfers within operating rooms present significant risks to patient safety, with falls potentially leading to serious consequences for both patients and staff. The aim of this study is to explore the factors contributing to falls during transfers and strategies to enhance patient safety in operating rooms.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study conducted using semi-structured interviews with fifteen operating room staff including nurse (n = 7), anaesthesia technician (n = 7) and scrub person (n = 1). Their ages ranged from 28 to 39 years, with experience years in the operating room ranging from two to ten years. The data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach based on the grounded theory.

RESULTS

The thematic analysis identified six key factors contributing to falls during patient transfers: human error, team coordination, patient condition, staffing challenges, equipment issues, and inadequate training. Participants recommended improving team collaboration, pre-operative patient education, better infrastructure (e.g., private elevators), hands-on training, and increased staffing. Additionally, policy changes to limit complex outpatient transfers were suggested to reduce risks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the risk factors and potential prevention strategies regarding falls during patient transfers in operating rooms. Future research should incorporate multidisciplinary observational studies involving human factors to provide deeper insights. It is recommended to create systems for anonymous incident reporting and implement comprehensive training programs.

Utilizing the DiSC Assessment in Surgical Residency Leadership Training to Address Communication Skill Acquisition: A Kern Six-step Approach to Curriculum Development

OBJECTIVE

Effective communication is essential in delivering high-quality patient care, and in recent years, resident education has expanded to focus on nontechnical skills and communication training. The "Everything DiSC" model is a communication inventory tool used to help employers and employees gain insight into how an individual may communicate within a team and how others may perceive similarities and differences in communication styles, comprising of Dominance (D), Influence (i), Steadiness (S), and Conscientiousness (C). In this report, we describe our experience mapping the DiSC model to the Kern 6-step framework for curriculum development and summarize residents' feedback several years following its implementation.

DESIGN

A general needs assessment was conducted to identify the problem of a lack of a formalized communication and leadership education and performed a general needs assessment. A curriculum was developed for a single academic surgical residency program to address development of nontechnical skills. We designed the leadership curriculum to be given over 4 sessions, with topics including from leadership styles, working within groups, feedback, and wellness. We utilized the DiSC tool, which is a 79-question survey, to establish communication styles of each of our residents and to determine the DiSC style.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single academic institution within a surgical residency training program.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included surgical residents at a single academic surgical training program.

RESULTS

The initial needs assessment survey was completed by 28 of 36 residents, with all residents surveyed (100%) agreeing that communication training was important. In contrast, only 21% agreed that they had received adequate training on communication during residency. 28 residents completed the DiSC Year-in-Review Survey, which indicated that overall, the residents felt that DiSC was useful throughout the year. The majority of residents listed learning and understanding other people's communication style as what they appreciated most about the DiSC sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of behavioral assessment tools within surgical residency education can provide an opportunity for residents to evaluate their communication techniques and provide a gained awareness across various settings. Continued focus on communication skills, such as with the use of the DiSC model, can enhance patient care at any institution providing such training. This leadership curriculum aided our surgical residency program and can likely facilitate similar value within other training institutions.

Maximizing Surgical Success by Aligning Interventions to Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Objective

This study aimed to identify common intraoperative interventions in surgery and evaluate their effectiveness in improving surgical outcomes.

Background

Despite decades of efforts, surgical adverse events remain stubbornly high. There are concerns that too much responsibility is placed on individuals to create change (ie, person-based interventions) rather than adapting systems to support human performance (ie, system-based interventions). This focus may be due to our limited understanding of which interventions most effectively improve outcomes.

Methods

A 2-step search was conducted. Systematic and meta-analytic reviews of Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Reviews, Cochrane Protocols and Cochrane Trials were identified, and individual studies within these reviews were selected. Qualitative content analysis categorized intervention and outcome types using inductive and deductive methods. Intervention details and directional findings for all outcomes were extracted.

Results

A total of 575 studies were included in the final analysis comprising 5,288,513 cases, 25,435 providers and patients, 2608 hospitals, across 50 countries, with 1221 outcomes extracted. Overall, the most common interventions were person-based, including education (38%) and policy (19%). Person-based interventions were more likely to improve interpersonal outcomes such as culture, professional development, and resilience. In contrast, system-based interventions, such as technology (15%), cognitive aids (11%), equipment (11%), standardization (4%), and environment redesign (2%), though less frequently implemented, were effective across all outcome types.

Conclusions

Although person-based interventions are widely implemented, system-based interventions generally have a greater impact on surgical outcomes. These results offer valuable insights for optimizing the alignment of interventions to outcomes.

Handoffs and transitions of care in the intensive care unit: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document

ABSTRACT

Objectives

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Critical Care Committee chose handoffs and transitions of care in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a clinically relevant topic for review. This clinical consensus document aims to provide practical guidance to the surgical intensivist on the best practices for patient handoffs and transitions of care.

Methods

A working group was formed from the committee-at-large to complete this work. The members of the working group were each assigned a subtopic to review using research to date. The research on which the recommendations are based was compiled at the discretion of the working group. Any topic with discrepant or minimal supporting literature was reviewed by the AAST Critical Care Committee through an anonymous survey.

Results

Recommendations for healthcare handovers include formally recognized handoffs at dedicated times, an interactive verbal exchange including all patients with a focus on what to anticipate or what is needs to be completed, tools to record and maintain information, and training to new providers on the handoff process and technology.

Conclusion

As clinicians, we strive to provide the best evidence-based care to our patients. It is essential to study these high states, ICU handoffs to enhance the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of patient care transitions, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and provider satisfaction.

Level of evidence

V.

Postoperative outcomes in colorectal surgery by day of surgery: A national cohort study

AIM

Poorer postoperative outcomes have been observed for patients admitted and operated on later in the week and over the weekend. This is thought to be related to temporal fluctuations in the quality of perioperative care. The aim of this work was to identify if the day of surgery influenced outcomes in a national cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) resections.

METHOD

A retrospective population-based study of patients undergoing CRC resection during the period 2010-2020 in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) was conducted. Ninety-day postoperative mortality, morbidity, postoperative length of stay (PLOS), reoperation and failure to rescue (FTR) were calculated for elective and acute cohorts, stratified by the day of surgery. FTR-Surgical (mortality following reoperation within 90 days of the index operation) was also analysed by day of reoperation. Univariable and mixed-effects, multivariate, logistic regression models were analysed.

RESULTS

The overall cohort included 17 174 patients who underwent surgery for CRC. The 90-day mortality in the elective and acute cohorts was 2.4% (336/13 744) and 11% (371/3430), respectively. Ninety-day mortality, inpatient complications, FTR and PLOS did not differ by day of surgery in acute and elective cohorts. Notably, patients having elective surgery on a Wednesday had a significantly higher rate of reoperation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.56, p = 0.012). Furthermore, reoperation following complication of the index surgery was associated with a significantly higher 90-day mortality (FTR-Surgical) for patients having reoperation on a Friday (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.01-4.33, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

There is no variation in postoperative outcomes across the week for both elective and emergency cases. This study does, however, highlight a higher FTR-S later on Friday, suggesting that these high-risk patients may require closer postoperative monitoring over the weekend.

The Power of The (First) Name: Do name tags for operating room staff improve effective communication and patient safety? A proof-of-concept study from an academic medical center in Germany

BACKGROUND

Effective and reliable communication is the cornerstone of safe communication in the operating room (OR). The OR is one of the most dynamic places in the hospital where multiple disciplines must work together in perfect harmony to ultimately improve patient outcomes. To create familiarity by name regarding constantly changing team members, individual name tagging was implemented in the OR.

METHODS

We analysed the impact of name tagging in the OR in a proof-of-concept study. Name tags (either first or last name), coloured according to the specific department, have been placed on the cap since March 13, 2023. On May 26, 2023, a total of 440 anaesthesiologists, general, visceral, and trauma surgeons, nurses, and service staff were invited to answer an evaluation questionnaire of nine questions. The survey period ended on August 7, 2023. 101 people answered the query which, among other things, asked for overall ratings, compliance, evaluation of specific items as well as positive and negative aspects. Statistical analyses were performed using R.

RESULTS

Most of the interviewed staff rated the implementation of name tagging positively (median=3.4; scale from 1-5, 1=bad, 5=good). The greatest benefit was seen in communication in general, direct contact with colleagues, and delegation of tasks. Most of the staff (>90 %) adhered to the new project and used it regularly. Negative aspects mentioned included potential loss of sterility, loss of respectability, and environmental impact. Potential for improvement was seen in the bonding method of attachment or in the implementation.

CONCLUSION

Individual name tagging in the OR can improve interprofessional communication and is one tool to enhance patient safety by decreasing reservations or intimidations towards previously unknown colleagues. More studies are required to determine long-term effects on patient safety, outcome, or employee satisfaction.

Intraoperative teamwork and occupational stress during robot-assisted surgery: An observational study

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) differs from traditional OR set-ups in several ways such as operation of technology and obstructed team communication that potentially affect surgical staff's stress experiences. The current study investigates the effects of key intraoperative job demands and resources on mental workload and perceived stress in RAS. We focused on the role of intraoperative teamwork as a resource that potentially reduces occupational stress. Combining standardized expert observations in the OR with healthcare providers' self-reports, the study involved two types of robot-assisted, urological interventions. The sample consisted of 73 observed surgeries and included 242 post-operative surveys on perceived stress and mental workload from surgeons and surgical nurses. Multilevel regression analyses reveal differential effects for stress and workload. Importantly, whereas better surgical teamwork was associated with lower stress, it was unrelated to workload. Our findings provide a nuanced picture of occupational stress in RAS, particularly regarding the role of intraoperative teamwork.

Hospital Unit Type and Professional Roles as a Predictor of Relational Coordination in an Army Medical Center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-quality communication and relationships are associated with quality of care. Workflow differences across hospital units can impede communication and relationships among health care professionals. Relational coordination (RC) is a process of communication supported by shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect and is associated with quality of care and better performance outcomes in civilian hospitals. However, RC has not been explored in military hospitals. The objective of our study was to determine whether RC differs between hospital units and professional roles. Specifically, we examined RC differences by unit type for nurses, resident physicians, and physicians working in an Army Medical Center.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory analysis of a secondary question from a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of active-duty and civilian licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), physician residents, and physicians (n = 289). We received institutional review board approval from the study site. Data were collected from January 2020 to March 2020, and participants completed a 47-item survey regarding their experiences of RC in various hospital units. We used t tests and one-way analyses of variance to explore bivariate relationships between RC and other study variables, as well as multiple regression to explore whether RC varied by unit type. We controlled for education and experience by including them in the model because these variables may influence perceptions of nurse-physician RC and their interactions with each other.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of participants were civilian (n = 203), 75% RNs (n = 217), and 78% female (n = 216). The mean age of respondents was 40 years (SD = 11.7), and the mean experience level was 11.9 years (SD = 9.5). RC was not associated with unit type. Total RC and between-role RC were associated with professional role. Physicians reported higher RC (β = .45, P = .01), and LPNs reported lower RC (β = -.06, P = .01). Education and experience were associated with RC. Participants with less experience reported higher RC (β = -.01, P = .00), and participants with graduate degrees reported lower RC (β = -.62, P = .00).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend hospital leaders consider interventions to build interprofessional relationships, including interdisciplinary meetings, huddles, and structured communication tools. Improving RC among health care professionals is a cost-effective and unique way to enhance communication and collaboration among health care professionals across hospital units.

Efficacy of transfer form implementation for adult burn patients between institutions to the Israeli National Burn Center

Burns are serious injuries associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In Israel, burn patients are often transferred between facilities. However, unstructured and non-standardized transfer processes can compromise the quality of patient care and outcomes. In this retrospective study, we assessed the impact of implementing a transfer form for burn management, comparing two populations: those transferred before and after the transfer form implementation. This study included 47 adult patients; 21 were transferred before and 26 after implementing the transfer form. We observed a statistically significant improvement in reporting rates of crucial information obtained by Emergency Room clinicians and inpatient management indicators. Introducing a standardized transfer form for burn patients resulted in improved communication and enhanced primary management, transfer processes, and emergency room preparation. The burns transfer form facilitated accurate and comprehensive information exchange between clinicians, potentially improving patient outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of structured transfer processes in burn patient care and emphasize the benefits of implementing a transfer form to streamline communication and optimize burn management during transfers to specialized burn centers.

Systematic Review of the Link Between Social Cognition and Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in People With Serious Mental Illness

Background and Hypothesis

People with serious mental illness (SMI; psychotic and affective disorders with psychosis) are at an increased risk of suicide, yet there is limited research on the correlates of suicide in SMI. Social cognitive impairments are common among people with SMI and several studies have examined social cognition and suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior. This systematic review aims to evaluate the links between various domains of social cognition, SI, and suicidal behavior in SMI.

Study Design

Electronic databases (PubMed and PsycInfo) were searched through June 2023. Records obtained through this search (N = 618) were screened by 2 independent reviewers according to inclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted, and study quality was assessed.

Study Results

Studies (N = 16) from 12 independent samples were included in the systematic review (N = 2631, sample sizes ranged from N = 20 to N = 593). Assessments of social cognition and SI and behavior varied widely between studies. Broadly, effects were mixed. Better emotion recognition of negative affect was linked to SI and a history of suicide attempts, though there is little consistent evidence for the relationship of emotion recognition and SI or behavior. On the other hand, better theory of mind ability was linked to SI and a history of suicide attempts. Furthermore, negative attributional bias was linked to current SI, but not a history of SI or attempt.

Conclusions

This review suggests mixed associations between social cognition, SI, and behavior in SMI. Future research should evaluate additional mediators and moderators of social cognition and suicide, employing prospective designs.

The Cognitive Basis for Human Error and the Best Practices to Reduce Error

A great deal of knowledge exists about how to make health care safer than it is currently. The tools exist but all too often, they are not implemented. All anesthesia providers need to understand what safety best practices are and continue to advocate for them in their workplaces.

Teamwork and mental workload in postsurgical pediatric patient handovers: Prospective effect evaluation of an improvement intervention for OR-PICU patient transitions

Postsurgical handover of pediatric patients from operating rooms (OR) to pediatric intensive care units (PICU) is a critical step. This transition is susceptible to errors and inefficiencies particularly if poor multidisciplinary teamwork occurs. Despite wide adoption of standardized handover interventions, comprehensive investigations into joint effects for patient care and provider outcomes are scarce. We aimed to improve OR-PICU handovers quality and sought to evaluate the intervention with particular attention to patient care effects and provider outcomes. A prospective, before-after-study design with an interrupted-series and a multi-source, mixed-methods evaluation approach was established. Drawing upon a participative plan-do-study-act approach, a standardized, checklist-based handover process was designed and implemented. For effect assessments, we observed OR-PICU handovers on site (pre implementation: n = 31, post: n = 30), respectively, with standardized expert observation and provider self-report tools (n = 111, n = 110). Setting was a tertiary Pediatric University Hospital. Supplementary qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a general inductive content analysis approach was used to identify key facilitators and barriers on implementation. Improvement efforts focused on stepwise implementation of (1) standardized handover process and (2) a checklist for multi-professional OR-PICU handover communication. We observed significant increases in team and patient setup (pre: 79.3%, post: 98.6%, p < .01), enhanced team engagement (pre: 50%, post: 81.7%, p < .01), and comprehensive information transfer by the anesthesia sub-team (pre: 78.6%, post: 87.3%, p < .01). Expert-rated teamwork outcomes were consistently higher, yet self-reported teamwork did not change over time. Provider perceived stress and disruptions did not change, mental workload tended to decrease over time (pre: M = 3.2, post: 2.9, p = .08). Comprehensiveness of post-operative patient information reported by PICU physician increased significantly: pre: 65.9%, post: 76.2%, p < .05. After implementation, providers acknowledged the importance of standardized handover practices and associated benefits for facilitation of information transfer and comprehensiveness. Among reported barriers were obstacles during implementation as well as insufficient consideration of professionals' individual workflow after surgery.

CONCLUSION

 A multidisciplinary intervention for postsurgical pediatric patient handovers was associated with improved expert-rated teamwork and fewer omissions of key patient information over time. Inconsistent results were obtained for provider-rated mental workload and teamwork outcomes. The findings contribute to a better understanding concerning the interplay of teamwork and provider cognitions in the course of establishing safe patient transitions in pediatric care.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Transfer of critically ill children conveys significant challenges for interprofessional communication and teamwork. Prospective research into interventions for safe and efficient handover practices of OR PICU patient transitions is necessary. • Checklists are assumed to facilitate cognitive load among providers in acute clinical environments.

WHAT IS NEW

• A standardized, checklist-based handover intervention was associated with improvements in team set-up and information transfer. Provider outcomes such as mental workload and stress did not change over time. • The combination of teamwork and provider assessments allows a more nuanced understanding of implementation barriers and sustainable effects in course of OR-PICU handover interventions.

Physician behaviors associated with increased physician and nurse communication during bedside interdisciplinary rounds

BACKGROUND

Effective team communication during interdisciplinary rounds (IDRs) is a hallmark of safe, efficient, patient-centered care. However, there is limited understanding of optimal IDR structures and procedures.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze direct observations of physician and nurse interactions during bedside IDR to identify behaviors associated with increased interprofessional communication.

DESIGNS, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Trained observers audited general medicine ward rounds at an academic medical center using a standardized tool to record physician and nurse behavior and communication in 1007 patient encounters in October 2019 to March 2020.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in physician and nurse interaction time among physicians with different levels of training, with attendings demonstrating higher interaction time than residents (5.4 ± 4.6 vs. 4.3 ± 3.7 min, p = .02) and interns or medical students (3.0 ± 3.2 min, p = .002). Attendings were more likely to initiate a conversation about nurse concerns (76.9%) compared to residents (67.9%) and interns or medical students (59.3%, p = .03). Early nurse participation in bedside visits was associated with increased physician and nurse interaction time (5.0 ± 4.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.7 min, p < .001) and physician initiative to ask about nurse concerns (74.8% vs. 64.3%, p = .04). In addition, physician initiative to ask the nurse for concerns rather than waiting for the nurse to offer concerns without being prompted was associated with a subsequent conversation about those concerns (74.5% vs. 61.8%, p < .001) and the physician asking about patient or family concerns (94.2% vs. 88.4%, p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing IDR structures and procedures that promote attending physician involvement, physician initiative, and early nurse participation could optimize interdisciplinary communication and quality of care.

The Adelaide Score: An artificial intelligence measure of readiness for discharge after general surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the performance of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of discharge within 12 and 24 h to produce a measure of readiness for discharge after general surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive general surgery patients at two tertiary hospitals, over a 2-year period, were included. Observation and laboratory parameter data were stratified into training, testing and validation datasets. Random forest, XGBoost and logistic regression models were evaluated. Each ward round note time was taken as a different event. Primary outcome was classification accuracy of the algorithmic model able to predict discharge within the next 12 h on the validation data set.

RESULTS

42 572 ward round note timings were included from 8826 general surgery patients. Discharge occurred within 12 h for 8800 times (20.7%), and within 24 h for 9885 (23.2%). For predicting discharge within 12 h, model classification accuracies for derivation and validation data sets were: 0.84 and 0.85 random forest, 0.84 and 0.83 XGBoost, 0.80 and 0.81 logistic regression. For predicting discharge within 24 h, model classification accuracies for derivation and validation data sets were: 0.83 and 0.84 random forest, 0.82 and 0.81 XGBoost, 0.78 and 0.79 logistic regression. Algorithms generated a continuous number between 0 and 1 (or 0 and 100), representing readiness for discharge after general surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A derived artificial intelligence measure (the Adelaide Score) successfully predicts discharge within the next 12 and 24 h in general surgery patients. This may be useful for both treating teams and allied health staff within surgical systems.

How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory

BACKGROUND

Efforts to involve patients in patient safety continue to revolve around professionally derived notions of minimising clinical risk, yet evidence suggests that patients hold perspectives on patient safety that are distinct from clinicians and academics. This study aims to understand how hospital inpatients across three different specialties conceptualise patient safety and develop a conceptual model that reflects their perspectives.

METHODS

A qualitative semi-structured interview study was conducted with 24 inpatients across three clinical specialties (medicine for the elderly, elective surgery and maternity) at a large central London teaching hospital. An abbreviated form of constructivist grounded theory was employed to analyse interview transcripts. Constant comparative analysis and memo-writing using the clustering technique were used to develop a model of how patients conceptualise patient safety.

RESULTS

While some patients described patient safety using terms consistent with clinical/academic definitions, patients predominantly conceptualised patient safety in the context of what made them 'feel safe'. Patients' feelings of safety arose from a range of care experiences involving specific actors: hospital staff, the patient, their friends/family/carers, and the healthcare organisation. Four types of experiences contributed to how patients conceptualise safety: actions observed by patients; actions received by patients; actions performed by patients themselves; and shared actions involving patients and other actors in their care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the need for a patient safety paradigm that is meaningful to all stakeholders, incorporating what matters to patients to feel safe in hospital. Additional work should explore and test how the proposed conceptual model can be practically applied and implemented to incorporate the patient conceptualisation of patient safety into everyday clinical practice.

Team- and task-related knowledge in shared mental models in operating room teams: A survey study

Objective

The operating room is a highly complex environment, where patient care is delivered by interprofessional teams. Unfortunately, issues with communication and teamwork occur, potentially leading to patient harm. A shared mental model is one prerequisite to function effectively as a team, and consists of task- and team-related knowledge. We aimed to explore potential differences in task- and team-related knowledge between the different professions working in the operating room. The assessed team-related knowledge consisted of knowledge regarding other professions' training and work activities, and of perceived traits of a high-performing and underperforming colleague. Task-related knowledge was assessed by mapping the perceived allocation of responsibilities for certain tasks, using a Likert-type scale.

Design

A single sample cross-sectional study.

Setting

The study was performed in three hospitals in the Netherlands, one academic center and two regional teaching hospitals.

Participants

106 health care professionals participated, of four professions. Most respondents (77%) were certified professionals, the others were still in training.

Results

Participants generally were well informed about each other's training and work activities and nearly everyone mentioned the importance of adequate communication and teamwork. Discrepancies were also observed. The other professions knew on average the least about the profession of anesthesiologists and most about the profession of surgeons. When assessing the responsibilities regarding tasks we found consensus in well-defined and/or protocolized tasks, but variation in less clearly defined tasks.

Conclusions

Team- and task-related knowledge in the operating room team is reasonably well developed, but irregularly, with potentially crucial differences in knowledge related to patient care. Awareness of these discrepancies is the first step in further optimization of team performance.

Investigating and acquiring motor expertise using virtual reality

After just months of simulated training, on January 19, 2019 a 23-year-old E-sports pro-gamer, Enzo Bonito, took to the racetrack and beat Lucas di Grassi, a Formula E and ex-Formula 1 driver with decades of real-world racing experience. This event raised the possibility that practicing in virtual reality can be surprisingly effective for acquiring motor expertise in real-world tasks. Here, we evaluate the potential of virtual reality to serve as a space for training to expert levels in highly complex real-world tasks in time windows much shorter than those required in the real world and at much lower financial cost without the hazards of the real world. We also discuss how VR can also serve as an experimental platform for exploring the science of expertise more generally.

Assisting in Microsurgery: Operative and Technical Considerations

Microsurgery is technically challenging, typically requiring a primary surgeon and an assistant to complete several key operative steps. These may include manipulation of fine structures, such as nerves or vessels in preparation for anastomosis; stabilization of the structures; and needle driving. Even seemingly mundane tasks of suture cutting and knot tying require fine coordination between the primary surgeon and assistant in the microsurgical environment. Although prior literature discusses the implementation of microsurgical training centers at academic institutions and residency programs, there is a paucity of work describing the role of the assistant surgeon in a microsurgery operation. In this surgical technique article, the authors discuss the role of the assisting surgeon in microsurgery, with recommendations for trainees and attendings alike.

Technical, Non-Technical, or Both? A Scoping Review of Skills in Simulation-Based Surgical Training

OBJECTIVE

Technical and non-technical skills are traditionally investigated separately in simulation-based surgical training (SBST). Recent literature has indicated an interrelation of these skills, but a clear relationship is yet to be established. This scoping review aimed to identify published literature on the use of both technical and non-technical learning objectives in SBST and investigate how the entities are related. Additionally, this scoping study reviewed the literature with the aim of mapping how publications on technical and non-technical skills within SBST have changed over time.

DESIGN

We conducted a scoping review using the 5 step framework by Arksey and O'Malley and reported our results according to the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. Four databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched for empirical studies on SBST. Studies within surgical training addressing both technical and non-technical learning objectives and presenting primary data were included for further analysis.

RESULTS

Our scoping review identified 3144 articles on SBST published between 1981 and 2021. During our analysis, an emphasis on technical skills training in published literature was identified. However, recent years have seen an immense increase of publications within either technical or non-technical skills. A similar trend is seen in publications addressing both technical and non-technical. In total, 106 publications addressed both technical and non-technical learning objectives and were included for further analysis. Only 45 of the included articles addressed the relationship between technical and non-technical skills. These articles mainly focused on the effect of non-technical skills on technical skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Though literature on the relationship between technical and non-technical skills remains scarce, the included studies on technical skills and non-technical skills such as mental training suggest such a relationship exists. This implies that the separation of the skill sets is not necessarily beneficial for the outcome of SBST. A shift towards seeing technical and non-technical skills as intertwined may enhance learning outcomes from SBST.

Impairments among DSM-5 eating disorders: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis

Previous research revealed that people who did not meet full DSM-IV criteria for anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), or binge-eating disorder (BED) but met criteria for eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) display high levels of psychiatric and physical morbidity commensurate with full criteria eating disorders. The DSM-5 introduced significant changes to eating disorder diagnostic criteria, so the present study aimed to determine whether the revised diagnostic criteria better distinguish between full criteria eating disorders, and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) and unspecified feeding or eating disorder (UFED). We present a series of meta-analyses comparing eating pathology, general psychopathology, and physical health impairments among those with AN, BN, and BED, compared to those with OSFED or UFED (n = 69 eligible studies). Results showed significantly more eating pathology in OSFED compared to AN, no difference in general psychopathology, and greater physical health impairments in AN. BN had greater eating pathology and general psychopathology than OSFED, but OSFED showed more physical health impairments. No differences were found between BN and purging disorder or low-frequency BN, or between BED and OSFED. Findings highlight the clinical severity of OSFED and suggest the DSM-5 criteria may not appropriately account for these presentations.

[Structured patient handover in high-risk areas : Evidence and recommendations for the practical implementation]

The perioperative setting is a high-risk environment which is particularly susceptible to communication deficits and errors. The situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) approach provides an intuitive guideline for team communication, which is associated with an improved quality of the handover. The German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) has updated its recommendations in March 2022 and continues to endorse the use of the SBAR template. The impact of tools used for structured communication during patient handover are often studied in the context of a larger bundle of measures. The SBAR template is one option for establishing structured communication in clinical practice. Successful implementation is supported by clearly defined standard workflows to promote consistent use. This standardization identifies common communication barriers and assists in resolving them in a high-risk environment. A common understanding of the inherent values, and a shared interest in learning, applying, and training these techniques are paramount in establishing a culture of patient safety. This can only be reached through excellent interprofessional teamwork and supportive leadership.

LEGO®-based communication assessment in virtual general surgery residency interviews

Purpose

Effective communication skills are a critical quality and skill that is highly sought after for surgeons which largely impacts patient outcomes. Residency programs design their interview processes to select the best candidates. LEGO®-based activities have been frequently used to enhance communication skills and team building. This study investigates the effectiveness and reliability of a novel LEGO®-based communication assessment in interviews for surgical residencies and the feasibility of implementing it in a virtual setting.

Methods

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of a LEGO®-based communication assessment at the program's 2020/2021 residency interviews. Each applicant was assessed on a different model. The total scores were analyzed for consistency among raters and correlated to faculty interviews. Furthermore, the impact of the assessment structure, scoring criteria, and range of models' difficulties on the total scores were explored.

Results

A total of 54 categorical and 55 preliminary applicants interviewed on 2 days. The assessment on different models and had no impact on applicants' total scores for either categorical and preliminary groups (p = 0.791 and 0.709, respectively). The communication components of the assessment showed high consistency between the raters. The two applicant groups displayed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) in the communication evaluation and model accuracy components. Total scores did not correlate with the faculty interviews of standardized questions in either group.

Conclusion

This novel LEGO®-based communication assessment showed high reliability and promising results as a tool to assess communication and problem solving for residency interviews that can be readily implemented in a virtual setting.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00021-4.

Effect of the surgical safety checklist on provider and patient outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite being implemented for over a decade, literature describing how the surgical safety checklist (SSC) is completed by operating room (OR) teams and how this relates to its effectiveness is scarce. This systematic review aimed to: (1) quantify how many studies reported SSC completion versus described how the SSC was completed; (2) evaluate the impact of the SSC on provider outcomes (Communication, case Understanding, Safety Culture, CUSC), patient outcomes (complications, mortality rates) and moderators of these relationships.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on 10 January 2020. We included providers who treat human patients and completed any type of SSC in any OR or simulation centre. Statistical directional findings were extracted for provider and patient outcomes and key factors (eg, attentiveness) were used to determine moderating effects.

RESULTS

300 studies were included in the analysis comprising over 7 302 674 operations and 2 480 748 providers and patients. Thirty-eight per cent of studies provided at least some description of how the SSC was completed. Of the studies that described SSC completion, a clearer positive relationship was observed concerning the SSC's influence on provider outcomes (CUSC) compared with patient outcomes (complications and mortality), as well as related moderators.

CONCLUSION

There is a scarcity of research that examines how the SSC is completed and how this influences safety outcomes. Examining how a checklist is completed is critical for understanding why the checklist is successful in some instances and not others.

Building Communication and Conflict Management Awareness in Surgical Education

OBJECTIVE

A group of surgeons and a medical educator constructed a curriculum to strengthen communication and emotional intelligence skills in the surgical setting.

DESIGN

The curriculum consisted of a small group discussion series occurring during medical students' eight-week surgery clerkship. The curriculum targeted the following objectives: building team rapport, exploring self-management strategies in team communication, recognizing communication styles, diagnosing conflict, identifying opportunities in professional and personal development, and discussing professionalism in medicine. Students completed pre-post Likert style tests about their knowledge and understanding of the above-mentioned topics.

SETTING

Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Surgical Clerkship at Baylor Scott and White Medical Center, a level 1 trauma center, in Temple, TX.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four students in their third year of medical school completed the communication curriculum.

RESULTS

Wilcoxon sign test was used to analyze the non-parametric data and multiple repeat tests required the significance level (p-Value) be adjusted to 0.003. Students showed significant increase in understanding of conflict management, their ability to communicate effectively, and their awareness of communication preferences (p < 0.001). In addition, they recognized better ways to engage with other students, residents, and staff on their rotation (p = 0.002) and felt more confident in their ability to handle feedback (p = 0.001). Open-ended responses on the post-test had overwhelmingly positive feedback with themes of awareness, psychological safety, and team rapport. Finally, students requested that the curriculum be taught longitudinally throughout their third-year clerkships.

CONCLUSIONS

Our curriculum enabled students to improve their awareness of communication, conflict management, team dynamics, and professionalism. These important competencies will support students throughout their training and in their practice as future surgeons.

Registered Nurses' and Medical Doctors' Experiences of Patient Safety in Health Information Exchange During Interorganizational Care Transitions: A Qualitative Review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize the best available literature on registered nurses' and medical doctors' experiences of patient safety in health information exchange (HIE) during interorganizational care transitions.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A total of 5 multidisciplinary databases were searched from January 2010 to September 2020 to identify qualitative or mixed methods studies. The qualitative findings were pooled using JBI SUMARI with the meta-aggregation approach.

RESULTS

The final review included 6 original studies. The 53 distinct findings were aggregated into 9 categories, which were further merged into 3 synthesized findings: (1) HIE efficiency and accuracy support patient safety during interorganizational care transitions; (2) inaccuracies in content and structure, along with poor HIE usability, jeopardize patient safety during interorganizational care transitions; and (3) health care professionals' (HCP) actions in HIE are associated with patient safety during interorganizational care transitions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review identified several advantages of HIE, namely, improvements in patient safety based on reduced human error. Nevertheless, a lack of usability and functionality can amplify the effects of human error and increase the risk of adverse events. In addition, HCPs' individual actions in HIE were found to influence patient safety. Hence, the cognitive and sociotechnical perspectives of work related to HIE should be studied. In addition, HCPs' experiences of each stage of HIE deployment should be clarified to ensure a high standard of patient safety. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020220631, registered on November 13, 2020.

Interprofessional simulation-based team-training and self-efficacy in emergency medicine situations

Teamwork quality has been shown to influence patient safety, and simulation-based team-training (SBTT) is an effective means to increase this quality. However, long-term effects are rarely studied. This study aims to investigate the long-term effects of interprofessional SBTT in emergency medicine in terms of global confidence, self-efficacy in interprofessional communication and in emergency medicine situations. Newly graduated doctors, nurses, auxiliary nurses, and medical and nursing students participated. Four emergency medicine scenarios focused on teamwork according to the A-B-C-D-E-strategy. All participants increased their global confidence from 5.3 (CI 4.9-5.8) before to 6.8 (CI 6.4-7.2; p < .0001) after SBTT. Confidence in interprofessional communication increased from 5.3 (CI 4.9-5.8) to 7.0 (CI 6.6-7.4; p < .0001). Students had the greatest gain. The self-efficacy following the A-B-C-D-E strategy increased from 4.9 (CI 4.4-5.3) to 6.6 (CI 6.2-7.0). Again, students had the steepest increase. Newly graduated doctors achieved a superior increase in global confidence as compared to nurses and auxiliary nurses (p < .0001). Their propensity to recommend SBTT to colleagues was 9.9 (CI 9.8-10.0). The positive effects were sustained over a six-month period, indicating that interprofessional SBTT had a positive impact on competence development, and a potential to contribute to increased team quality in emergency medicine care.

Semantically Ambiguous Language in the Teaching Operating Room

OBJECTIVE

Teaching and training surgeons work hard in the OR to understand each other, yet miscommunication is an important cause of preventable adverse events in surgery. Our objective was to perform a formal semantic analysis of language in authentic teaching surgical cases, identify the prevalence and typology of ambiguous or potentially ambiguous language, and describe their potential for miscommunication.

DESIGN

In this secondary analysis of qualitative data, we collaborated with a semanticist, categorizing linguistic phenomena often associated with miscommunication. We defined an ambiguous phenomenon as a string of language that could be reasonably interpreted in more than one way. We analyzed transcripts of 319 minutes of surgery, coding for 14 linguistic categories. Cohen's kappa was calculated. We determined the prevalence and rate of each linguistic category and chose illustrative examples.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Six surgical attendings, four fellows, and six residents, ranging from PGY1 to PGY4, at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a tertiary medical center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

RESULTS

We found 3912 examples of potentially ambiguous language, 12.3 per minute. Percentage agreement between two expert raters was 76.3%. The most common phenomena were deixis (3.1 per minute), directional (2.6), anaphora (1.3), implicit instruction (1.3), and degree modifiers (0.7). Restatements/reframing occurred 1.4 times per minute. We identified 131 near misses associated with potentially ambiguous language. Cohen's kappa was 0.70 among expert semanticists.

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially ambiguous language is common and has the potential to jeopardize safe teaching surgery. We postulate that the high amount of potentially ambiguous language use in the operating room places a burden on the training surgeon to comprehend surgical instruction.

Do We Feel Safe About the Surgical Safety Checklist? A Cross-Sectional Study Between Two Periods

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in the healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) and patient safety in the operating room (OR) at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. Data were collected from two years (2011 and 2019) for comparison. The co-investigators distributed a self-administered Likert scale questionnaire in the various operating areas (35 ORs).

Results

The total sample was 461. Number of participants enrolled from both years was 235 (51%) and 226 (49%), respectively. The results indicated a statistically significant difference in the attitude of the participants regarding all aspects of patient safety in the OR when the two periods were compared (p < 0.001). Similarly, healthcare providers' perceptions regarding the importance of the WHO SSC increased from 50% (2011) excellent to 68% excellent (2019) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Currently, more healthcare providers recognize the importance of the WHO SSC, and more have a positive attitude toward teamwork, communication, and feeling free to speak out when surgical safety is compromised. All of these cultural changes have positive impact on the overall safety of the OR; however, there are still aspects requiring improvement to provide a safer OR and surgery. Educational interventions regarding the importance of communication and teamwork would improve the safety of surgical care in the OR.

Orthopedic Surgical Helmet Systems Significantly Impair Speech Intelligibility

Surgical suits provide protection to orthopedic surgeons, but the suits and fan noise may interfere with communication between operative team members. The goal of this study was to quantify the fan sound and effect of the suit, fan, and N95 mask. Sound levels were measured using a specialized manikin and evaluated using preferred speech interference levels (PSILs), noise criterion (NC) ratings, and comparison with speech sound levels from the literature. Additionally, sound blocking due to the surgical suit was measured and combined effects of the fan and suit were described using a signal to noise ratio (SNR). The noise with the fan at medium and high speed was louder than average speech and the PSILs at these speeds were significantly higher than with the fan off. The fan NC rating of 50 to 60 exceeded the recommended range of 25 to 30 for operating rooms. The N95 mask, space suit, and distance between speaker and receiver all reduced the sound signal at the receiver's ear, with the worst case being full personal protective equipment on both and speaker distanced from receiver. The estimated SNR for the suit and fan system was negative for many frequency bands used in speech, indicating more noise than signal. Multiple measures indicated that the fan noises were at levels associated with speech interference. This noise combined with sound blocking provided by the suit produced SNRs commonly associated with noisy to very noisy environments. This study suggests the combined effects of the suit, fan, and distance may negatively impact operating room communication. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):208-214.].

Enhancing Interprofessional Collaboration in Perioperative Setting from the Qualitative Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses

Communication failures were a leading cause of sentinel events in the operation room due to frequently the communication breakdown occurs between physicians and nurses. This study explored the perspectives of surgical teams (nurses, physicians, and anaesthesiologists) on interprofessional collaboration and improvement strategies. A surgical team comprising eight perioperative nurses, four surgeons, and four anaesthesiologists from a university-affiliated hospital participated in this qualitative and phenomenological research from December 2018 to April 2019. Data were collected in in-depth interviews and were used in a thematic analysis according to Colaizzi to extract themes and categorised codes with the ATLAS.ti software. The result is presented in three generic categories: Barrier-like disruptive behaviours and lack of coordination of care; consequences by safety threats to the patient; overcoming barriers by shared decision making among professionals, flattened hierarchies, and teamwork/communication training. The conclusion is that different teams’ perspectives can facilitate genuine reflection, discussion, and implementation of targeted interventions to improve operating room interprofessional collaboration and overcome barriers and their consequences. Currently, there is a need to change towards interprofessional collaboration for optimal patient outcomes and to ensure all professionals’ expectations are met.

Accountable Operating Room Teams

With Medicare reimbursement diminishing and the aging population consuming more health care, hospitals continue to push for reforms to improve the efficiency of health care delivery, decrease consumption, and elevate the quality of care. Operating rooms command a large share of hospital resources but are also major revenue generators. Surgical care has evolved to become more efficient and accountable. Defining the characteristics of an accountable operating room team has been more elusive and inconsistent. This review defines the characteristics of accountable operating room teams and recommends measures by which to evaluate them. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e463-e470.].

Anesthesia screen use may impact operating room communication practices in otolaryngology

OBJECTIVES

Failures in communication are a leading contributor to medical error. There is increasing attention on cultivating robust communication practices in the Operating Room (OR) to mitigate against patient injury and optimize efficient patient care. Few studies have evaluated how surgical equipment may introduce barriers to team dynamics.

DESIGN

We conducted a pilot observational study to examine the relationship between anesthesia screen drapes (which are used inconsistently) and the frequency of verbal exchanges between surgical and anesthesia members. 25 procedures spanning various procedures in Otolaryngology were covertly observed, 12 of which employed a screen. Verbal exchanges were recorded across three stages of the surgery: pre-procedure (before the draping), procedure (drapes placed throughout) and post-procedure (after the removal of the draping). Speaker and content of the exchange was noted as well as various features about the procedure.

RESULTS

Decreases in rates of exchanges were most pronounced during the procedure stage, although they did not reach significance on T-testing (p = 0.0719). After controlling for attending, table orientation and number of professionals, regression analysis did reveal a statistically significant decrease in rates of verbal exchanges during the procedure in the presence of the anesthesia screen (7.17 (± 6.33) versus 2.23 (± 1.00), p = 0.0318). Differences were also significant among surgeon-initiated and patient-care-related exchanges (p = 0.0168 and p = 0.0432, respectively). Decreases in anesthesiologist-initiated and non-clinical exchanges did not reach significance (p = 0.1530 and p = 0.5120, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that anesthesia screens may negatively impact communication practices in the OR.

Are operating room distractions, interruptions and disruptions associated with performance and patient safety? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The operating room is a complex environment in which distractions, interruptions and disruptions (DIDs) are frequent. Our aim was to synthesize research on the relationships between DIDs and (i) operative duration, (ii) team performance, (iii) individual performance and (iv) patient safety outcomes in order to better understand how interventions can be designed to mitigate the negative effects of DIDs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and reference lists were systematically searched. Included studies were required to report the quantitative outcomes of the association between DIDs and team performance, individual performance and patient safety. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on a subset of studies reporting total operative time and DIDs.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were identified. The majority were prospective observational studies (n = 15) of moderate quality. DIDs were often defined, measured and interpreted differently in studies. DIDs were significantly associated with extended operative duration (n = 8), impaired team performance (n = 6), self-reported errors by colleagues (n = 1), surgical errors (n = 1), increased risk and incidence of surgical site infection (n = 4) and fewer patient safety checks (n = 1). A random-effects meta-analysis showed that the proportion of total operative time due to DIDs was 22.0% (95% confidence interval 15.7-29.9).

CONCLUSION

DIDs in surgery are associated with a range of negative outcomes. However, significant knowledge gaps exist about the mechanisms that underlie these relationships, as well as the potential clinical and non-clinical benefits that DIDs may deliver. Available evidence indicates that interventions to reduce the negative effects of DIDs are warranted, but current evidence is not sufficient to make recommendations about potentially useful interventions.

Facilitators and barriers of care transitions - Comparing the perspectives of hospital and community healthcare staff

As a patient moves from hospital back home to receive community-based care, quality of care and patient safety are often put at risk. This study aimed to analyse the discharge process to identify and compare the barriers and facilitators within the context of the system in which they occur, from the perspectives of both hospital and community healthcare staff. The results were derived from the analysis of 348 incident reports, the observation of five discharge planning meetings with hospital staff, three focus groups with hospital staff, and six focus groups with community healthcare staff. Five themes representative of the barriers and four themes representative of the facilitators for this process were identified from both hospital and community healthcare staff's perspective. These were then discussed in the context of the subsystem, hospital or community healthcare setting, in which they occur.

Therapeutic strategies for stricturing Crohn’s disease in childhood: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Childhood stricturing Crohn's disease (CD) has significant morbidity. Interventions including resection, stricturoplasty and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) are often required. Optimal intervention modality and timing, and use of adjuvant medical therapies, remains unclear. We aim to review the therapies used in paediatric stricturing CD.

METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with PRISMA was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42020164464). Demographics, stricture features, interventions and outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were selected, including 177 patients (183 strictures). Strictures presented at 40.6 months (range 14-108) following CD diagnosis. Medical therapy was used in 142 patients for an average of 20.4 months (2-36), with a complete response in 11 (8%). Interventions were undertaken in 138 patients: 53 (38%) resections, 39 (28%) stricturoplasties, and 17 (12%) EBD. Complications occurred in 11% of resections, versus 15% stricturoplasties, versus 6% EBD (p = 0.223). At a median follow-up of 1.9 years (interquartile range 1.2-2.4) pooled stricture recurrence was 22%. Resection had 9% recurrence, versus 38% stricturoplasty, versus 47% EBD (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and complications. There remains a paucity of evidence regarding adjuvant medical therapy and the role of EBD. We propose a minimum reported dataset for interventions in paediatric stricturing CD.

How to reduce failure to rescue after visceral surgery?

Mortality after visceral surgery has decreased owing to progress in surgical techniques, anesthesiology and intensive care. Mortality occurs in 5-10% of patients after major surgery and remains a topic of interest. However, the ratio of mortality after postoperative complications in relation to overall complications varies between hospitals because of failure to rescue at the time of the complication. There are multiple factors that lead to complication-related mortality: they are patient-related, disease-related, but are related, above all, to the timeliness of diagnosis of the complication, the organisational aspects of management in private or public hospitals, hospital volume that corresponds to the centralisation of initial management or to the concept of referral centre in case of complications, to the team spirit, to communication between the health care providers and to the management of the complication itself. Several organisational advances are to be considered, such as the development of shorter hospitalisations and notably ambulatory surgery, as well as enhanced recovery programs. Remote monitoring and the contribution of artificial intelligence must also be evaluated in this context. The reduction of mortality after visceral surgery rests on several tactics: prevention of potentially lethal complications, the all-important reduction of failure to rescue, and risk management before, during and after hospitalisations that are increasingly shorter.

Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does patient safety improve when adding the preoperative and postoperative Surgical Patient Safety System checklists to the World Health Organization’s established surgical safety checklist?

Findings

In this stepped-wedge cluster nonrandomized clinical trial with parallel controls that included 9009 surgical procedures, reductions in complications and emergency reoperations occurred when the preoperative Surgical Patient Safety System was added to the surgical safety checklist. The postoperative Surgical Patient Safety System reduced readmissions, whereas overall increased complications were found in the 9678 parallel controls.

Meaning

These findings suggest that joint use of the preoperative and postoperative Surgical Patient Safety System with the intraoperative surgical safety checklist is beneficial for patients.

Importance

Checklists have been shown to improve patient outcomes in surgery. The intraoperatively used World Health Organization surgical safety checklist (WHO SSC) is now mandatory in many countries. The only evidenced checklist to address preoperative and postoperative care is the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS), which has been found to be effective in improving patient outcomes. To date, the WHO SSC and SURPASS have not been studied jointly within the perioperative pathway.

Objective

To investigate the association of combined use of the preoperative and postoperative SURPASS and the WHO SSC in perioperative care with morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In a stepped-wedge cluster nonrandomized clinical trial, the preoperative and postoperative SURPASS checklists were implemented in 3 surgical departments (neurosurgery, orthopedics, and gynecology) in a Norwegian tertiary hospital, serving as their own controls. Three surgical units offered additional parallel controls. Data were collected from November 1, 2012, to March 31, 2015, including surgical procedures without any restrictions to patient age. Data were analyzed from September 25, 2018, to March 29, 2019.

Interventions

Individualized preoperative and postoperative SURPASS checklists were added to the intraoperative WHO SSC.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were in-hospital complications, emergency reoperations, unplanned 30-day readmissions, and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS).

Results

In total, 9009 procedures (5601 women [62.2%]; mean [SD] patient age, 51.7 [22.2] years) were included, with 5117 intervention procedures (mean [SD] patient age, 51.8 [22.4] years; 2913 women [56.9%]) compared with 3892 controls (mean [SD] patient age, 51.5 [21.8] years; 2688 women [69.1%]). Parallel control units included 9678 procedures (mean [SD] patient age, 57.4 [22.2] years; 4124 women [42.6%]). In addition to the WHO SSC, adjusted analyses showed that adherence to the preoperative SURPASS checklists was associated with reduced complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98; P = .04) and reoperations (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.76; P = .004). Adherence to the postoperative SURPASS checklists was associated with decreased readmissions (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.64; P = .001). No changes were observed in mortality or LOS. In parallel control units, complications increased (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P = .04), whereas reoperations, readmissions, and mortality remained unchanged.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this nonrandomized clinical trial, adding preoperative and postoperative SURPASS to the WHO SSC was associated with a reduction in the rate of complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01872195

OR and ICU teams 'running in parallel' at the end of cardiothoracic surgery improves perceptions of handoff safety

The transfer of a cardiac surgery patient from the operating room (OR) to the intensive care unit (ICU) is both a challenging process and a critical period for outcomes. Information transferred between these two teams-known as the 'handoff'-has been a focus of efforts to improve patient safety. At our institution, staff have poor perceptions of handoff safety, as measured by low positive response rates to questions found in the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS). In this quality improvement project, we developed a novel handoff protocol after cardiac surgery where we invited the ICU nurse and intensivist into the OR to receive a face-to-face handoff from the circulating nurse, observe the final 30 min of the case, and participate in the end-of-case debrief discussions. Our aim was to increase the positive response rates to handoff safety questions to meet or surpass the reported AHRQ national averages. We used plan, do, study, act cycles over the course of 123 surgical cases to test how our handoff protocol was leading to changes in perceptions of safety. After a 10-month period, we achieved our aim for four out of the five HSOPS questions assessing safety of handoff. Our results suggest that having an ICU team 'run in parallel' with the cardiac surgical team positively impacts safety culture.

Nursing surveillance and immediate jeopardy in Veteran Health Administration community living centers unannounced survey program 2018 to 2019

BACKGROUND

The VA Community Living Center (CLC) Unannounced Survey Program aims to assess standards of care set by the government to protect residents.

PURPOSE

To describe patterns of practice failures in nursing surveillance causing or having potential to cause immediate jeopardy, as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

METHODS

Using CLC survey data consisting of 200 statements of deficiency (SODs) for 2018 to 2019, we collected a SOD sample (n = 20) of immediate jeopardy events. They were described using descriptive statistics and discourse content analysis.

FINDINGS

We identified clinical events, their duration, work shift, and nursing skill mix for each SOD. Most to least common themes about failures in nursing surveillance were acquisition/transfer of information; decision-making; and early recognition of problems.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis of nursing surveillance failures in CLC immediate jeopardy SODs provides insight into opportunities for registered nurses and the nursing skill mix to reduce avoidable harms.

Operating Room Times For Teaching and Nonteaching Cases are Converging: Less Time for Learning?

OBJECTIVE

To compare differences in operating room (OR) times between teaching and nonteaching cases across calendar years. We hypothesize that time devoted to intraoperative resident education is decreasing, therefore, OR times for teaching and nonteaching cases will be converging.

BACKGROUND

Teaching cases take longer than similar nonteaching cases, in part due to intraoperative resident education. Pressures to improve OR efficiency and patient safety may threaten resident education and leave less time for intraoperative learning; however, the magnitude of impact is unknown.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) deidentified national databases from 2006 to 2012, queried for 30 most common General surgery procedures and case teaching status (i.e., teaching vs. nonteaching cases).

DESIGN

The NSQIP database was retrospectively reviewed to identify the 30 most common General Surgery procedures. Teaching cases included all operations in which a resident participated. Multivariable regression analyses were constructed to determine the impact of resident involvement on OR times, controlling for year, resident participation, procedure, and patient demographics and comorbidities. Difference-in-difference analysis was performed to assess OR time differences between teaching and nonteaching cases across calendar years and within subpopulations.

RESULTS

A total of 693,223 cases met inclusion criteria. Average overall OR times were 98.89 minutes (teaching) vs. 74.22 minutes (nonteaching), with a difference of 24.67 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.34-24.99 minutes, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, the difference between teaching and nonteaching cases was 21.94 minutes (95% CI = 21.11-22.76) in 2006 and 13.95 minutes (95% CI = 10.62-17.28) in 2012, with a difference-in-difference of 7.99 minutes per case. A similar trend was observed across individual PGYs and several individual procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

OR times for teaching and nonteaching cases converged by approximately 8 minutes per general surgery procedure during the 7-year study period, representing a 36% reduction in the difference between groups. We must seek to better understand the source of this convergence, and in doing so ensure to preserve and enhance the intraoperative learning experience of surgical trainees.

The Selection of Main Surgical Work Factors in Operating Rooms

The main component of error minimization in operating rooms (ORs) is to maintain high reliability of surgical teams. The analysis of adverse events in the OR reveals deficiencies in cognitive and interpersonal skills as the main factors influencing surgeons’ errors. Therefore, research of these additional factors is necessary, besides factors related to surgeons’ clinical knowledge and technical skills. In this paper, the key factors for evaluating activities in surgical operating rooms are identified. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is used for identification of key factors. Fifteen key factors are identified for evaluating activities in surgical operating rooms to improve the efficiency of surgical operations. For each group of activities (surgical “capabilities,” operating room characteristics, and non-technical skills), five factors are identified. As the most important, the following factors are obtained: communication, indoor environment standardization, and tool handle design. The aim of the analysis of these key factors is surgeons’ work capability enhancement, rational design of operating rooms, and advancement of operators’ cognitive and interpersonal skills.

How ICU Patient Severity Affects Communicative Interactions Between Healthcare Professionals: A Study Utilizing Wearable Sociometric Badges

Numerous factors affecting the interactions between healthcare professionals in the workplace demand a comprehensive understanding if the quality of patient healthcare is to be improved. Our previous cross-sectional analysis showed that patient severity scores [i.e., Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II] in the 24 h following admission positively correlated with the length of the face-to-face interactions among ICU healthcare professionals. The present study aims to address how the relationships between patient severity and interaction lengths can change over a period of time during both admission and treatment in the ICU. We retrospectively analyzed data prospectively collected between 19 February to 17 March 2016 from an open ICU in a University Hospital in Japan. We used wearable sensors to collect a spatiotemporal distribution dataset documenting the face-to-face interactions between ICU healthcare professionals, which involved 76 ICU staff members, each of whom worked for 160 h, on average, during the 4-week period of data collection. We studied the longitudinal relationships among these interactions, which occurred at the patient bedside, vis-à-vis the severity of the patient's condition [i.e., the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score] assessed every 24 h. On Day 1, during which a total of 117 patients stayed in the ICU, we found statistically significant positive associations between the interaction lengths and their SOFA scores, as shown by the Spearman's correlation coefficient value (R) of 0.447 (p < 0.01). During the course of our observation from Day 1 to Day 10, the number of patients (N) who stayed in the ICU gradually decreased (N = 117, Day1; N = 10, Day 10), as they either were discharged or died. The statistically significant positive associations of the interaction lengths with the SOFA scores disappeared from Days 2 to 6, but re-emerged on Day 7 (R = 0.620, p < 0.05) and Day 8 (R = 0.625, p < 0.05), then disappearing again on Days 9 and 10. Whereas all 6 SOFA sub-scores correlated well with the interaction lengths on Day 1, only a few of the sub-scores (coagulation, cardiovascular, and central nervous system scores) did so; specifically, those on Days 7 and 8. The results suggest that patient severity may play an important role in affecting the interactions between ICU healthcare professionals in a time-related manner on ICU Day 1 and on Days 7/8.

Coordination and Communication in Healthcare Action Teams

Abstract. Communication and coordination represent central processes in healthcare action teams. However, we have a limited understanding of how expertise affects these processes and to what extent these effects are shaped by interprofessional differences. The current study addresses these questions by jointly investigating the influence of different aspects of expertise – individual expertise, team familiarity, and expertise asymmetry – on coordination quality and communication openness. We tested our propositions in two hospitals: one in Switzerland (CH, Sample 1) and one in the United Kingdom (UK, Sample 2). Both samples included two-person anesthesia action teams consisting of a physician and a nurse ( NCH = 47 teams, NUK = 48 teams). We used a correlational design with two measurement points (i.e., pre- and postoperation). To consider potential interprofessional differences, we analyzed our data with actor-partner interdependence models. Moreover, we explored differences in the effects of expertise between both hospitals. Our findings suggest that nurses’ expertise is the most important predictor of coordination quality and communication openness. Overall, differences between the two hospitals were more prevalent than interprofessional differences between physicians and nurses. The current study provides a nuanced picture of the effects of expertise, and thereby extends our understanding of interprofessional teamwork.

Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Many patients are admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery, and some of them will experience incomplete recovery. For patients in this situation, preoperative discussions regarding patient values and preferences may direct care decisions. Existing literature shows that it is uncommon for surgeons to have these conversations preoperatively; it is unclear whether anesthesia professionals engage with patients on this topic prior to surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on communication between patients and anesthesia professionals, with a focus on discussions related to postoperative critical care.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched using specific search criteria from January 1980 to April 2020. Studies describing encounters between patients and anesthesia professionals were selected, and data regarding study objectives, study design, methodology, measures, outcomes, patient characteristics, and clinical setting were extracted and collated. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed.

FINDINGS

A total of 12 studies including 1284 individual patient encounters were eligible for inclusion in the review. These studies demonstrated that communication between patients and anesthesia professionals related to postoperative care is rare: only 2 studies reported communication regarding adverse postoperative events, and this communication behavior was reported in only 46 of 1284 consultations (3.6%) across all studies. Additional findings were that communication during these encounters is dominated by anesthetic planning and perioperative logistics, with variable discussion of perioperative risks vs benefits and infrequent elicitation of patient values and preferences. Some data suggest that patients wish to be involved in perioperative decision-making but are often limited by an incomplete understanding of risks and benefits.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review found that communication in anesthesia is dominated by anesthetic planning and discussion of preoperative logistics, whereas postoperative critical care is rarely discussed. Most patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit after a major operation will not have had a discussion regarding goals of care specific to protracted recovery or prolonged intensive care with their anesthesiologist.

Parent and Clinician Communication During Paediatric Burn Wound Care: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

To thematically describe parent-clinician communication during a child's first burn dressing change following emergency department presentation.

DESIGN AND METHODS

An observational study of parent-clinician communication during the first burn dressing change at a tertiary children's hospital. Verbal communication between those present at the dressing change for 87 families, was audio recorded. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analysed within NVivo11 qualitative data analysis software using qualitative content analysis.

FINDINGS

Three themes, underpinned by parent-clinician rapport-building, were identified. Firstly, knowledge sharing was demonstrated: Clinicians frequently informed the parent about the state of the child's wound, what the procedure will involve, and need for future treatment. Comparatively, parents informed the clinician about their child's temperament and coping since the accident. Secondly, child procedural distress management was discussed: Clinicians and parents had expectations about the likelihood of procedural distress, which was also related to communication about how to prevent and interpret procedural distress (i.e., pain/fear). Finally, parents communicated to clinicians about their own distress, worry and uncertainty, from the accident and wound care. Parents also communicated guilt and blame in relation to injury responsibility.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a description of parent-clinician communication during paediatric burn wound care.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The results can assist healthcare professionals to be prepared for a range of conversations with parents during potentially distressing paediatric medical procedures.

Scars of childhood socioeconomic stress: A systematic review

Childhood socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with the development of adult psychological outcomes, with DNA methylation (DNAm) as a mechanism to potentially explain these changes. We present the first systematic review synthesising the literature investigating childhood SEP and DNAm. Thirty-two publications were included. Seventeen studies focused on candidate genes, typically focusing on genes implicated with the stress response and/or development of psychiatric conditions. These studies typically investigated different regions of the genes, which revealed inconsistent results. Six studies calculated epigenetic age, with a small number revealing an elevated significant association with childhood SEP. Epigenome-wide studies revealed altered patterns of DNAm which varied between the nine studies. This research area is emerging and demonstrated great variance in findings with no clear patterns identified across studies. Multiple methodological shortcomings are identified, including at the phenotypic level where construct validity of childhood SEP is highly inconsistent, with studies using a wide range of measures. Larger cohorts will be required with international collaborations to strengthen this research area.

Structured Feedback Enhances Compliance with Operating Room Debriefs

BACKGROUND

Surgical debriefs help reduce preventable errors in the operating room (OR) leading to patient injury. However, compliance with debriefs remains poor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of structured feedback to surgeons in improving compliance with and quality of surgical debriefs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical cases at an 875-bed urban teaching hospital from January-June 2019 were audited via audio/video recording to evaluate debrief performance. Debriefs were evaluated for clinical completeness and teamwork quality via two structured forms. Surgeons received an evaluation of their debrief performance at two time points during the study period (February and April). Univariate and mixed-effects regression analyses were used to assess changes in debrief compliance and quality over time.

RESULTS

A total of 878 surgical cases performed by 61 surgeons were reviewed: 198 (22.6%) cases during Period 1 (P1), 371 (42.3%) P2, and 309 (35.1%) P3. The rate at which a debrief occurred was 62.1% in P1, 73.0% in P2, and 82.2% in P3 (P < 0.001). Debriefs were 1.96 (95% CI 1.31-2.95, P = 0.001) times more likely to be completed during P2 and 3.21 (95% CI 2.07-5.04, P < 0.001) times more likely during P3 compared to P1. The percent of debriefs initiated by the lead surgeon increased from 59.8% in P1, to 80.0% in P2, to 81.5% in P3 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Providing structured feedback to surgeons on their debrief performance was associated with improvements in compliance and completeness with debriefing protocols, OR teamwork and communication, and leadership and accountability from the lead surgeons.