Rehabilitation psychology's role in the level I trauma center

Screening tools for predicting posttraumatic stress disorder in acutely injured adult trauma patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adult trauma patients are at risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Early intervention reduces the development of PTSD, but few trauma patients seek and obtain care. Valid and reliable screening tools are needed to identify patients at risk of developing PTSD. The objective of this review is to identify existing screening tools and evaluate their accuracy for predicting PTSD outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, PsychInfo, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies evaluating the predictive accuracy of PTSD screening tools among traumatically injured adult civilians. Eligible studies assessed patients during acute hospitalization and at least 1 month following injury to measure PTSD outcome. Eligible outcomes included measures of predictive accuracy, such as sensitivity and specificity. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each study, and the strength of evidence was assessed following the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality guidelines.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies were included evaluating the predictive accuracy of 38 screening tools. Most tools were assessed in a single study. Questionnaire-style tools had more favorable predictive ability than diagnostic interview assessments. The Injured Trauma Survivor Screen, Posttraumatic Adjustment Screen, the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and the Richmond et al. tool demonstrated the most favorable predictive accuracy, with high sensitivity (75-100%) and specificity (67-94%). Common sources of bias were selection bias due to high attrition rate and using nondiagnostic tools to assess PTSD symptoms at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although sensitivity and specificity of PTSD predictive tools varied widely, several emerged with favorable predictive accuracy. Further research is needed to define the ability of screening and intervention to prevent PTSD in injured trauma survivors. The results of this review can inform screening tool options for screening programs and future intervention studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, level III.

Mental Health and Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Considerations for Rehabilitation Providers

Purpose of Review

Assessing and addressing the mental and behavioral health concerns of individuals with SCI during rehabilitation is crucial, as untreated mental health distress can lead to reduced gains in rehabilitation and poor overall health. This review provides an overview of the latest research on prevalence rates of common mental and behavioral health concerns in the SCI population, highlighting disability-specific factors that may impact traditional assessment and treatment of mental health concerns.

Recent Findings

While those with SCI are at a heightened risk for experiencing mental health distress, overall, the majority of those with SCI adapt well, and live a full and meaningful life.

Summary

Rehabilitation psychologists are a vital aspect of rehabilitation teams, as they can address behavioral health and mental health concerns that may impede patients achieving their rehabilitation goals.

Depressive Symptoms Predict Delayed Ambulation After Traumatic Injury

BACKGROUND

Impaired psychological state, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, occurs in up to 40% of patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. These symptoms, in the acute period, may delay engagement in activity, such as ambulation, following injury. The purpose of this study was to determine whether baseline anxiety and depressive symptoms predicted delayed (>48 hr from admission) ambulation in patients hospitalized for major traumatic injury.

METHODS

Adults (n = 19) admitted for major trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] = 15) provided a baseline measure of anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]). Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive power of baseline HADS Anxiety and HADS Depression subscale scores for delayed ambulation while controlling for ISS.

RESULTS

At baseline, anxiety was present in 32% of patients; 21% reported depressive symptoms. Baseline HADS Anxiety score did not predict the ambulation group. However, for each 1 point increase in baseline HADS Depression score, the likelihood of patients ambulating after 48 hr from admission increased by 67% (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% CI [1.02, 2.72]; p = .041).

CONCLUSION

Worsening depressive symptoms were associated with delayed ambulation in the acute period following injury. Future, larger scale investigations are needed to further elucidate the relationship between psychological symptoms and the acute recovery period from trauma to better inform clinicians and guide development of interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Screening and treating hospitalized trauma survivors for posttraumatic stress disorder and depression

Traumatic injury affects over 2.6 million U.S. adults annually and elevates risk for a number of negative health consequences. This includes substantial psychological harm, the most prominent being posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), with approximately 21% of traumatic injury survivors developing the disorder within the first year after injury. Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with deficits in physical recovery, social functioning, and quality of life. Depression is diagnosed in approximately 6% in the year after injury and is also a predictor of poor quality of life. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma suggests screening for and treatment of PTSD and depression, reflecting a growing awareness of the critical need to address patients' mental health needs after trauma. While some trauma centers have implemented screening and treatment or referral for treatment programs, the majority are evaluating how to best address this recommendation, and no standard approach for screening and treatment currently exists. Further, guidelines are not yet available with respect to resources that may be used to effectively screen and treat these disorders in trauma survivors, as well as who is going to bear the costs. The purpose of this review is: (1) to evaluate the current state of the literature regarding evidence-based screens for PTSD and depression in the hospitalized trauma patient and (2) summarize the literature to date regarding the treatments that have empirical support in treating PTSD and depression acutely after injury. This review also includes structural and funding information regarding existing postinjury mental health programs. Screening of injured patients and timely intervention to prevent or treat PTSD and depression could substantially improve health outcomes and improve quality of life for this high-risk population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Review, level IV.

Task-shifting to improve the reach of mental health interventions for trauma patients: findings from a pilot study of trauma nurse training in patient-centered activity scheduling for PTSD and depression

Despite high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression among traumatically injured patients, engagement in session-based psychotherapy early after trauma is limited due to various service utilization and readiness barriers. Task-shifting brief mental health interventions to routine trauma center providers is an understudied but potentially critical part of the continuum of care. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of training trauma nurses to engage patients in patient-centered activity scheduling based on a Behavioral Activation paradigm, which is designed to counteract dysfunctional avoidance/withdrawal behavior common among patients after injury. Nurses (N = 4) and patients (N = 40) were recruited from two level II trauma centers. A portion of a one day in-person workshop included didactics, demonstrations, and experiential activities to teach brief intervention delivery. Nurses completed pre- and posttraining standardized patient role-plays prior to and two months after training, which were coded for adherence to the intervention. Nurses also completed exit interviews to assess their perspectives on the training and addressing patient mental health concerns. Findings support the feasibility of training trauma nurses in a brief mental health intervention. Task-shifting brief interventions holds promise for reaching more of the population in need of posttrauma mental health care.

Examining the relationship between obesity and mental health outcomes among individuals admitted to a level I trauma centre

The increased incidence of obesity in the general population translates into clinicians caring for an increased number of trauma patients with obesity. Previous research has documented the unique anatomical and physiological challenges that clinicians face when caring for trauma patients with obesity; however, little is known about psychological challenges that trauma patients with obesity may also experience in the months following injury. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between obesity and (i) mental health, (ii) demographic and injury-related variables and (iii) quality-of-life outcomes among trauma patients between hospitalization and 3-months post-injury. This is a prospective, longitudinal study conducted between March 2012 and May 2014 at a single, level I trauma centre in the southwest United States. Inclusion criteria for this convenience sample consisted of patients who were admitted to the trauma or orthopaedic trauma service ≥24 h, medically stable, spoke English or Spanish and ≥18 years of age. In total, 455 eligible patients were consented and enrolled; 343 (70.87%) completed 3-month follow-up. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between obesity and mental health among trauma patients in the months following injury. Demographic and injury-related data were also collected; patients' height and weight were used to determine body mass index. Health outcomes were assessed during initial hospitalization and at 3-month follow-up and included depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, pain and return to work. Prior to data collection, it was hypothesized that obesity would have a negative effect on mental health outcomes among patients 3 months post-injury. The final sample consisted of 343 participants; average age was 46.4 ± 17.3 years; majority male (n = 213, 63%) and Caucasian (n = 231, 69%). Patients with obesity had higher odds of screening positive for depression (odds ratio [OR] = 2.36, P = 0.02) and overweight patients had lower odds of returning to work (OR = 0.31, P = 0.01) 3 months post-injury compared to patients of normal weight (65% vs. 40%). No other significant differences were found. Results of the current study are novel in that they identify psychological challenges that overweight and trauma patients with obesity may experience. These results demonstrate the need for mental health professionals to be involved in follow-up care to extending in the months following injury.

Alcohol and drug toxicology screens at time of hospitalization do not predict PTSD or depression after traumatic injury

BACKGROUND

Identifying risk factors for the development of PTSD and depression is critical for intervention and recovery after injury. Given research linking toxicology screens and substance use and the evidenced relationship between substance misuse and distress, the current study aimed to gauge the predictive value of toxicology testing on PTSD and depression.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a Level I Trauma Center (N = 379) completed the PC-PTSD, PCL-C, and PHQ-8 at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Results showed 52% of tested patients had a positive toxicology test, 51% screened for PTSD, and 54% screened for depression. Positive drug or alcohol toxicology tests were not significantly associated with PTSD or depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Toxicology testing may not meaningful predict depression or PTSD in traumatic injury patients. Future research using validated measures of problematic substance use is needed to better understand how misuse may influence the development of psychological distress.

Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Among Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Trauma: A Brief Report

Background: Attention has recently focused on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Purpose: To examine characteristics of individuals with and without symptoms of PTSD following acute SCI. Methods: Data were collected on 23 patients (age, 34.5 ± 14.4 years) at a Level I trauma center (14.35 ± 18.48 days following injury). Results: There were 52.2% (n = 12) who experienced symptoms of PTSD post injury, with a significant association in patients with a history of psychological disorders (p = .0094). Conclusion: Findings suggest that patients with SCI who present with PTSD symptoms in the acute trauma care settting should be provided with specific cognitive behavioral interventions.

The Times They Are a Changin': Neuropsychology and Integrated Care Teams

OBJECTIVE

To gather illustrative data from clinical neuropsychologists who are working in integrated care settings in order to provide an initial blueprint for moving forward in this new era of health care.

METHOD

A survey was designed to illustrate the ways in which neuropsychologists are participating in integrated care teams and distributed on major neuropsychology listservs. The survey evaluated the settings, roles, services provided, practice issues, remuneration, and impact of neuropsychologists' participation in integrated care teams with respect to patient care and health outcomes. Frequencies were used to summarize the findings as well as qualitative coding of narrative responses.

RESULTS

There were 412 respondents to the survey and 261 of those indicated that they worked in at least one integrated care setting. Neuropsychologists work in a variety of integrated care settings and provide diverse services which contribute to improved patient care and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Three primary themes emerge from the findings with regard to the engagement and teams: advocacy, collaboration, and communication. We argue for the need for more easily accessible outcome studies illustrating the clinical benefits and cost-savings associated with inclusion of neuropsychologists in integrated care teams. In addition, educational and training initiatives are needed to better equip current and future clinical neuropsychologists to function effectively in integrated care settings.