Correlation of BK Virus Neutralizing Serostatus With the Incidence of BK Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2017;101:1495-1505. [PMID: 27854236 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001261]

Nonclinical and clinical characterization of MAU868, a novel human-derived monoclonal neutralizing antibody targeting BK polyomavirus VP1

Reactivation of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) can cause significant kidney and bladder disease in immunocompromised patients. There are currently no effective, BKPyV-specific therapies. MAU868 is a novel, human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that binds the major capsid protein, VP1, of BKPyV with picomolar affinity, neutralizes infection by the 4 major BKPyV genotypes (EC50 ranging from 0.009-0.093 μg/mL; EC90 ranging from 0.102-4.160 μg/mL), and has comparable activity against variants with highly prevalent VP1 polymorphisms. No resistance-associated variants were identified in long-term selection studies, indicating a high in vitro barrier-to-resistance. The high-resolution crystal structure of MAU868 in complex with VP1 pentamer identified 3 key contact residues in VP1 (Y169, R170, and K172). A first-in-human study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MAU868 following intravenous and subcutaneous administration to healthy adults in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, single ascending dose design. MAU868 was safe and well-tolerated. All adverse events were grade 1 and resolved. The pharmacokinetics of MAU868 was typical of a human IgG, with dose-proportional systemic exposure and an elimination half-life ranging between 23 and 30 days. These results demonstrate the potential of MAU868 as a first-in-class therapeutic agent for the treatment or prevention of BKPyV disease.

Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Importance and Therapeutic Potential for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Most of the world's adult population is latently infected by the BK polyomavirus. It causes asymptomatic infection in healthy individuals but emerged as a threat to kidney transplant recipients because of virus-associated nephropathy caused by immunosuppressive therapy. In these conditions, when a functional cellular response is impaired by immunosuppression, neutralizing antibodies may play a major role because they can directly prevent infection of target cells, independently of cell-mediated immunity, by binding to the viral particles. Studying the contribution of anti-BK virus neutralizing antibodies in viral control has long been hampered by the lack of convenient in vitro models, but major progress has been made in the past decade. The four BK virus genotypes have been demonstrated to behave as distinct serotypes. A low recipient neutralizing antibody titer against the donor's serotype before kidney transplant has been significantly associated with BK virus replication after transplant. Different mechanisms exploited by the BK virus to evade neutralizing antibodies have been described. Recent studies also support the potential benefit of administering intravenous Igs or monoclonal neutralizing antibodies as a therapeutic strategy, and more interestingly, this could also be used as preventive or preemptive therapy before advanced kidney damage has occurred. Besides, neutralizing antibodies could be induced by vaccination. In this review, we summarize accumulated knowledge on anti-BK virus neutralizing antibodies as well as their clinical importance and therapeutic potential for kidney transplant recipients.

Structural implications of BK polyomavirus sequence variations in the major viral capsid protein Vp1 and large T-antigen: a computational study

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a double-stranded DNA virus causing nephropathy, hemorrhagic cystitis, and urothelial cancer in transplant patients. The BKPyV-encoded capsid protein Vp1 and large T-antigen (LTag) are key targets of neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T-cells, respectively. Our single-center data suggested that variability in Vp1 and LTag may contribute to failing BKPyV-specific immune control and impact vaccine design. We, therefore, analyzed all available entries in GenBank (1516 VP1; 742 LTAG) and explored potential structural effects using computational approaches. BKPyV-genotype (gt)1 was found in 71.18% of entries, followed by BKPyV-gt4 (19.26%), BKPyV-gt2 (8.11%), and BKPyV-gt3 (1.45%), but rates differed according to country and specimen type. Vp1-mutations matched a serotype different than the assigned one or were serotype-independent in 43%, 18% affected more than one amino acid. Notable Vp1-mutations altered antibody-binding domains, interactions with sialic acid receptors, or were predicted to change conformation. LTag-sequences were more conserved, with only 16 mutations detectable in more than one entry and without significant effects on LTag-structure or interaction domains. However, LTag changes were predicted to affect HLA-class I presentation of immunodominant 9mers to cytotoxic T-cells. These global data strengthen single center observations and specifically our earlier findings revealing mutant 9mer epitopes conferring immune escape from HLA-I cytotoxic T cells. We conclude that variability of BKPyV-Vp1 and LTag may have important implications for diagnostic assays assessing BKPyV-specific immune control and for vaccine design.

IMPORTANCE

Type and rate of amino acid variations in BKPyV may provide important insights into BKPyV diversity in human populations and an important step toward defining determinants of BKPyV-specific immunity needed to protect vulnerable patients from BKPyV diseases. Our analysis of BKPyV sequences obtained from human specimens reveals an unexpectedly high genetic variability for this double-stranded DNA virus that strongly relies on host cell DNA replication machinery with its proof reading and error correction mechanisms. BKPyV variability and immune escape should be taken into account when designing further approaches to antivirals, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccines for patients at risk of BKPyV diseases.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

The value and complexity of studying cellular immunity against BK Polyomavirus in kidney transplant recipients

BK Polyomavirus is of particular concern for kidney transplant recipients, due to their immunosuppression. This problem is exacerbated by the high effectiveness of antirejection therapies, which also compromise the organism's ability to fight viral infections. The long-term risk is loss of graft function through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). The assessment of host immunity and its link to the control of viral infections is a major challenge. In terms of humoral immunity, researchers have highlighted the prognostic value of the pre-transplantation anti-BKPyV immunoglobulin G titer. However, humoral immunity alone does not guarantee viral clearance, and the correlation between the humoral response and the time course of the infection remains weak. In contrast, cellular immunity variables appear to be more closely associated with viral clearance, given that the cellular immune response to the kidney transplant is the main target of immunosuppressive treatments in recipients. However, the assessment of the cellular immune response to BK Polyomavirus is complex, and many details still need to be characterized. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about BKPyV cellular immunity, as well as the difficulties that may be encountered in studying it in kidney transplant recipient. This is an essential area of research for optimizing the management of transplant recipients and minimizing the risks associated with insidious BKPyV disease.

Leflunomide as adjunct therapy for BK viremia management in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK viremia after kidney transplantation (KT) poses significant risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy and impacts graft survival. Conventional treatment involves reduction of immunosuppression, which in turn may increase risk for rejection. To address this dilemma, use of anti-viral therapy with immunosuppressive properties such as leflunomide is an attractive option.

METHODS

We performed a multi-center, retrospective chart review to report tolerability and effectiveness of leflunomide use for the eradication of BK viremia and prevention of BK virus-associated nephropathy in pediatric KT recipients.

RESULTS

Seventy patients prescribed leflunomide were included and were followed up from initiation until 1 year following leflunomide completion. BK viremia was eradicated in 64 (91.4%) patients including 8 of 11 with nephropathy (BKVN) on initial biopsy. Reduced anti-proliferative medication (AP) dosing was not associated with increase in biopsy proven rejection (BPAR). However, complete discontinuation of AP during leflunomide therapy was associated with increase in BPAR in uni- and multivariate logistic regression, as was targeted reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) trough goals. One graft was lost to BKVN. There was no significant association found between time to BK eradication and leflunomide trough concentration, mycophenolate dose reduction, or steroid use (univariate logistic regression). Few leflunomide adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported (most commonly: gastrointestinal, hematologic).

CONCLUSION

Leflunomide is a promising adjunctive treatment to immunosuppression reduction for BK virus eradication with minimal ADR. AP reduction, not discontinuation, and judicious reduction in CNI trough goals with close monitoring, is a promising strategy for treatment of BK viremia with concomitant use of leflunomide therapy.

A multivalent polyomavirus vaccine elicits durable neutralizing antibody responses in macaques

In 2019, there were about 100,000 kidney transplants globally, with more than a quarter of them performed in the United States. Unfortunately, some engrafted organs are lost to polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) caused by BK and JC viruses (BKPyV and JCPyV). Both viruses cause brain disease and possibly bladder cancer in immunosuppressed individuals. Transplant patients are routinely monitored for BKPyV viremia, which is an accepted hallmark of nascent nephropathy. If viremia is detected, a reduction in immunosuppressive therapy is standard care, but the intervention comes with increased risk of immune rejection of the engrafted organ. Recent reports have suggested that transplant recipients with high levels of polyomavirus-neutralizing antibodies are protected against PyVAN. Virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines, similar to approved human papillomavirus vaccines, have an excellent safety record and are known to induce high levels of neutralizing antibodies and long-lasting protection from infection. In this study, we demonstrate that VLPs representing BKPyV genotypes I, II, and IV, as well as JCPyV genotype 2 produced in insect cells elicit robust antibody titers. In rhesus macaques, all monkeys developed neutralizing antibody titers above a previously proposed protective threshold of 10,000. A second inoculation, administered 19 weeks after priming, boosted titers to a plateau of ≥ 25,000 that was maintained for almost two years. No vaccine-related adverse events were observed in any macaques. A multivalent BK/JC VLP immunogen did not show inferiority compared to the single-genotype VLP immunogens. Considering these encouraging results, we believe a clinical trial administering the multivalent VLP vaccine in patients waiting to receive a kidney transplant is warranted to evaluate its ability to reduce or eliminate PyVAN.

Proteomic analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles of kidney transplant recipients with BKV viruria and viremia: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

To better define the biological machinery associated with BK virus (BKV) infection, in kidney transplantation, we performed a proteomics analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs).

METHODS

Twenty-nine adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with normal allograft function affected by BKV infection (15 with only viremia, 14 with viruria and viremia) and 15 controls (CTR, KTRs without BKV infection) were enrolled and randomly divided in a training cohort (12 BKV and 6 CTR) used for the mass spectrometry analysis of the EVs (microvesicles and exosomes) protein content and a testing cohort (17 BKV and 9 CTR) used for the biological validation of the proteomic results by ELISA. Bioinformatics and functional analysis revealed that several biological processes were enriched in BKV (including immunity, complement activation, renal fibrosis) and were able to discriminate BKV vs. CTR. Kinase was the only gene ontology annotation term including proteins less abundant in BKV (with SLK being the most significantly down-regulated protein). Non-linear support vector machine (SVM) learning and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) identified 36 proteins (including DNASE2, F12, AGT, CTSH, C4A, C7, FABP4, and BPNT1) able to discriminate the two study groups. The proteomic profile of KTRs with BKV viruria alone vs. viremia and viruria was quite similar. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for SLK, BPNT1 and DNASE2, performed on testing cohort, validated proteomics results.

DISCUSSIONS

Our pilot study demonstrated, for the first time, that BKV infection, also in the viruric state, can have a negative impact on the allograft and it suggested that, whether possible, an early preventive therapeutic strategy should be undertaken also in KTRs with viruria only. Our results, then, revealed new mechanistic insights into BKV infection and they selected potential biomarkers that should be tested in future studies with larger patients' cohorts.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review

BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.

The impact of pre-graft serology on the risk of BKPyV infection post-renal transplantation

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy, is a troublesome disease induced by BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in immunocompromised renal graft recipients with no effective available treatment, making immunosuppression reduction the only management option. Thus, pre-graft predictive BKPyV replication markers are needed for high-risk viremia patient identification.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study to assess the correlation between the BKPyV pre-transplant serostatus and post-transplant BKPyV infection incidence. Sera from 329 recipients and 222 matched donors were tested for anti-BKV antibodies against BKPyV serotypes I and IV by a VLPs-based IgG ELISA, and BKPyV DNA load was monitored for at least 1 year post transplantation.

RESULTS

80 recipients were viruric and 59 recipients were viremic post transplantation. In the post-transplant period, the probability of developing viremia for serotype I was increasing from 4.3% for the D-/R + group to 12.1% for the D+/R + group and climbing to 37.5% for the D+/R- group (p < 0.05). When calculating the recipient mean titers for serotypes I and IV, we observed a clear difference in the proportions of viremia passing from 50% for mean titers < 400 to 13.5% for titers ≥ 400 (p < 0.001) with also a higher proportion of presumptive nephropathy (50% vs 23.1%, p < 0.05). In univariate analysis this parameter has an odds ratio of 6.41 for the risk of developing post-transplant BKPyV viremia (95% CI: 3.16-13.07; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both donor and recipient BKPyV seropositivity determination before transplantation and antibody titer may serve as a predictive tool to manage clinical BKPyV infection by identification of patients at high risk.

Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors as a risk factor for BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplantation

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is responsible for a significant percentage of transplanted kidneys prematurely terminating their function. Its occurrence is closely related to the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. In a group of 161 newly transplanted patients, we prospectively evaluated 457 protocol renal biopsies performed within the first year after transplantation. Using the calcineurin inhibitors (CI) nephrotoxicity score, the incidence of nephrotoxicity was monitored as a manifestation of excessive immunosuppression. Findings were correlated with clinical evidence of active BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication and PyVAN. Compared to the normal histology, nephrotoxicity was associated with more frequent BKPyV viremia and viruria (p = .01 and p < .01, respectively) and more common occurrence of PyVAN. The persistence of toxicity in the subsequent biopsy proved to be a negative risk factor of viremia and viruria (p = .03 and p < .01, respectively), independently of the initial BKPyV status. Toxicity could also be used as a predictor of viremia and viruria (p = .04 and p < .01, respectively) even in the absence of viral replication at the time of initial biopsy. The early histological manifestation of CI nephrotoxicity was associated with significant BKPyV reactivation in the risky first posttransplant year.

BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: Balancing Rejection and Infection

BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection are two closely-associated diseases on opposite ends of the immune scale in kidney transplant recipients. The principle of balancing the immune system remains the mainstay of therapeutic strategy. While patient outcomes can be improved through screening, risk factors identification, and rapid reduction of immunosuppressants, a lack of standard curative therapy is the primary concern during clinical practice. Additionally, difficulty in pathological differential diagnosis and clinicopathology’s dissociation pose problems for a definite diagnosis. This article discusses the delicate evaluation needed to optimize immunosuppression and reviews recent advances in molecular diagnosis and immunological therapy for BKVN patients. New biomarkers for BKVN diagnosis are under development. For example, measurement of virus-specific T cell level may play a role in steering immunosuppressants. The development of cellular therapy may provide prevention, even a cure, for BKVN, a complex post-transplant complication.

Usefulness of BK virus-specific interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay for predicting the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate if BK virus (BKV)-specific T cell immunity measured by an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay can predict the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included 68 KTRs with different viremia status (no viremia [n = 17], BK viremia [n = 27], and cleared viremia [n = 24]) and 44 healthy controls (HCs). The BK viremia group was divided into controller (< 3 months) and noncontroller (> 3 months) according to sustained duration of BKV infection. We compared BKV-ELISPOT results against five BKV peptides (large tumor antigen [LT], St, VP1-3).

RESULTS

BKV-ELISPOT results were higher in three KTRs groups with different BKV infection status than the HCs group (p < 0.05). In KTR groups, they were higher in cleared viremia group than no viremia or BK viremia group. Within the BK viremia group, controller group had higher LT-ELISPOT results compared to noncontroller group (p = 0.032). Also, KTRs without BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) had higher LT, St, VP1, and VP2-ELISPOT results than those with BKVN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BKV-ELISPOT assay may be effective in predicting clinical outcomes of BKV infection in terms of clearance of BK virus and development of BKVN.

Variations in BK Polyomavirus Immunodominant Large Tumor Antigen-Specific 9mer CD8 T-Cell Epitopes Predict Altered HLA-Presentation and Immune Failure

Failing BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-specific immune control is underlying onset and duration of BKPyV-replication and disease. We focused on BKPyV-specific CD8 T-cells as key effectors and characterized immunodominant 9mer epitopes in the viral large tumor-antigen (LTag). We investigated the variation of LTag-epitopes and their predicted effects on HLA-class 1 binding and T-cell activation. Available BKPyV sequences in the NCBI-nucleotide (N = 3263), and the NCBI protein database (N = 4189) were extracted (1368 sequences) and analyzed for non-synonymous aa-exchanges in LTag. Variant 9mer-epitopes were assessed for predicted changes in HLA-A and HLA-B-binding compared to immunodominant 9mer reference. We identified 159 non-synonymous aa-exchanges in immunodominant LTag-9mer T-cell epitopes reflecting different BKPyV-genotypes as well as genotype-independent variants altering HLA-A/HLA-B-binding scores. Decreased binding scores for HLA-A/HLA-B were found in 27/159 (17%). This included the immunodominant LPLMRKAYL affecting HLA-B*07:02-, HLA-B*08:01- and HLA-B*51:01-presentation. In two healthy BKPyV-seropositive HLA-B*07:02 blood donors, variant LSLMRKAYL showed reduced CD8 T-cell responses compared to LPLMRKAYL. Thus, despite LTag being highly conserved, aa-exchanges occur in immunodominant CD8 T-cell epitopes of BKPyV-genotypes as well as of genotypes -independent variants, which may contribute to genotype-dependent and genotype-independent failure of cellular immune control over BKPyV-replication. The data warrant epidemiological and immunological investigations in carefully designed clinical studies.

Advances in BK Virus Complications in Organ Transplantation and Beyond

Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) remains a dreaded complication in immunosuppressed states. Conventionally, BKV is known as a cause for BKV-associated nephropathy and allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. However, emerging studies have shown its negative impact on native kidney function and patient survival in other transplants and its potential role in diseases such as cancer. Because BKV-associated nephropathy is driven by immunosuppression, reduction in the latter is a convenient standard of care. However, this strategy is risk prone due to the development of donor-specific antibodies affecting long-term allograft survival. Despite its pathogenic role, there is a distinct lack of effective anti-BKV therapeutics. This limitation combined with increased morbidity and health care cost of BKV-associated diseases add to the complexity of BKV management. While summarizing recent advances in the pathogenesis of BKV-associated nephropathy and its reactivation in other organ transplants, this review illustrates the limitations of current and emerging therapeutic options and provides a compelling argument for an effective targeted anti-BKV drug.

Role of novel biomarkers in kidney transplantation

Clinical application of biomarkers is an integral component of transplant care. Clinicians and scientists alike are in search of better biomarkers than the current serologic (serum creatinine, donor-specific antibodies), urine-derived (urinalysis, urine protein), and histologic ones we now use. The science behind recent biomarker discovery spans across multiple molecular biologic disciplines, including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Innovative methodology and integration of basic and clinical approaches have allowed researchers to unearth molecular phenomena preceding clinical disease. Biomarkers can be classified in several ways. In this review, we have classified them via their origin and outcome: Primarily immunologic, i.e., representative of immune regulation and dysfunction and non-immunologic, pertaining to delayed graft function, cardiovascular events/mortality, infection, malignancy, post-transplant diabetes, graft, and patient survival. Novel biomarker uses to guide the diagnosis and management of transplant-related outcomes is a promising area of research. However, the use of biomarkers to predict outcomes after kidney transplantation is not well studied. In this review, we summarize the recent studies illustrating biomarker use and transplant outcomes.

BK polyomavirus-specific antibody and T-cell responses in kidney transplantation: update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has emerged as a significant cause of premature graft failure after kidney transplantation. Without effective antiviral drugs, treatment is based on reducing immunosuppression to regain immune control over BKPyV replication. The paradigm of high-level viruria/decoy cells, BKPyV-DNAemia, and proven nephropathy permits early interventions. Here, we review recent findings about BKPyV-specific antibody and T-cell responses and their potential role in risk stratification, immune monitoring, and therapy.

RECENT FINDING

Kidney transplant recipients having low or undetectable BKPyV-specific IgG immunoglobulin G (IgG) are higher risk for developing BKPyV-DNAemia if the donor has high BKPyV-specific IgG. This observation has been extended to neutralizing antibodies. Immunosuppression, impaired activation, proliferation, and exhaustion of BKPyV-specific T cells may increase the risk of developing BKPyV-DNAemia and nephropathy. Clearance of BKPyV-DNAemia was correlated with high CD8 T cell responses to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-types presenting BKPyV-encoded immunodominant 9mers. For clinical translation, these data need to be assessed in appropriately designed clinical studies, as outlined in recent guidelines on BKPyV in kidney transplantation.

SUMMARY

Evaluation of BKPyV-specific immune responses in recipient and donor may help to stratify the risk of BKPyV-DNAemia, nephropathy, and graft loss. Future efforts need to evaluate clinical translation, vaccines, and immunotherapy to control BKPyV replication.

Association of Pretransplant BK Polyomavirus Antibody Status with BK Polyomavirus Infection After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study of 47 Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevention and early detection of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is important for long-term kidney graft survival; hence, pretransplant screening methods are essential to identify recipients at high risk for BKV infection. This study investigated the association of pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status with the occurrence of post-transplant BKV infection.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 47 adult living donor kidney transplant pairs from December 2014 to January 2016. Recipient and donor pretransplant BKV antibody titer was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Donor and recipient median HI titer of 1:20 was used as a cutoff to define seropositivity. Recipients were divided into 2 groups (BKV antibody donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) and non-D+/R-). Urinary cytology was used to screen for BKV infection. Plasma polymerase chain reaction testing for BKV DNA was used when decoy cells in urine were persistently detected.

RESULTS

Nine (19.2%) of 47 patients belonged to the D+/R- group. Decoy cells were observed in 32 recipients (68.1%) during follow-up. BK viremia occurred in 3 (6.4%) cases. The maximum decoy cell count was significantly higher in the D+/R- group than in the non-D+/R- group (P = .0002). Decoy-cell-free survival was significantly shorter in the D+/R- group (P = .0220). Multivariate analysis identified only BKV antibody serostatus as an independent risk factor for decoy cell appearance (P = .0491).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status was associated with higher maximum decoy cell count and shorter decoy-cell-free survival after kidney transplantation.

BK polyomavirus genotypes in renal transplant recipients in the United States: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the United States, increasing ethnic diversity has been apparent. However, the epidemiology and trends of BKV genotypes remain unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to assess the prevalence of BKV genotypes among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients in the United States.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted through October 2018 utilizing MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database to identify studies that reported the prevalence of BKV subtypes and/or subgroups in KTx recipients in the United States. Pooled prevalence rates were combined using random effects, generic inverse variance method. The protocol for this study is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42019134582).

RESULTS

A total of eight observational studies with a total of 193 samples (urine, blood, and kidney tissues) from 188 BKV-infected KTX recipients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated prevalence rates of BKV subtypes were 72.2% (95% confidence of interval [CI]: 62.7-80.0%) for subtype I, 6.8% (95% CI: 2.5-16.9%) for subtype II, 8.3% (95% CI: 4.4-15.1%) for subtype III, and 16.1% (95% CI: 10.4-24.2%) for subtype IV, respectively. While metaregression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between year of study and the prevalence of BKV subtype I (slopes = +0.1023, P = .01), there were no significant correlations between year of study and percentages of BKV subtype II-IV (P > .05). Among KTx recipients with BKV subtype I, the pooled estimated percentages of BKV subgroups were 22.4% (95% CI: 13.7-34.5%) for subgroup Ia, 30.6% (95% CI: 17.7-47.5%) for subgroup Ib1, 47.7% (95% CI: 35.8-59.9%) for subgroup Ib2, and 4.1% (95% CI:1.2-13.3%) for subgroup Ic, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BKV subtype I is the most prevalent subtype among KTx recipients in the United States and its prevalence seems to increasing overtime. Subgroup Ib2 is the most common subgroup among BKV subtype I.

Pre-Transplantation Assessment of BK Virus Serostatus: Significance, Current Methods, and Obstacles

The immunosuppression required for graft tolerance in kidney transplant patients can trigger latent BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) reactivation, and the infection can progress to nephropathy and graft rejection. It has been suggested that pre-transplantation BKPyV serostatus in donors and recipients is a predictive marker for post-transplantation BKPyV replication. The fact that research laboratories have used many different assay techniques to determine BKPyV serostatus complicates these data analysis. Even studies based on the same technique differed in their standard controls choice, the antigenic structure type used for detection, and the cut-off for seropositivity. Here, we review the different BKPyV VP1 antigens types used for detection and consider the various BKPyV serostatus assay techniques’ advantages and disadvantages. Lastly, we highlight the obstacles in the implementation of a consensual BKPyV serologic assay in clinics (e.g., the guidelines absence in this field).

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

Human Memory B Cells Harbor Diverse Cross-Neutralizing Antibodies against BK and JC Polyomaviruses

Human polyomaviruses cause a common childhood infection worldwide and typically elicit a neutralizing antibody and cellular immune response, while establishing a dormant infection in the kidney with minimal clinical manifestations. However, viral reactivation can cause severe pathology in immunocompromised individuals. We developed a high-throughput, functional antibody screen to examine the humoral response to BK polyomavirus. This approach enabled the isolation of antibodies from all peripheral B cell subsets and revealed the anti-BK virus antibody repertoire as clonally complex with respect to immunoglobulin sequences and isotypes (both IgM and IgG), including a high frequency of monoclonal antibodies that broadly neutralize BK virus subtypes and the related JC polyomavirus. Cryo-electron microscopy of a broadly neutralizing IgG single-chain variable fragment complexed with BK virus-like particles revealed the quaternary nature of a conserved viral epitope at the junction between capsid pentamers. These features unravel a potent modality for inhibiting polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients and other immunocompromised patients.

Source and Relevance of the BK Polyomavirus Genotype for Infection After Kidney Transplantation

Background

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)–associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a major threat for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The role of specific BKPyV genotypes/serotypes in development of BKPyVAN is poorly understood. Pretransplantation serotyping of kidney donors and recipients and posttransplantation genotyping of viremic recipients, could reveal the clinical relevance of specific BKPyV variants.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 386 living kidney donor-recipient pairs was serotyped before transplantation against BKPyV genotype I–IV viral capsid protein 1 antigen, using a novel BKPyV serotyping assay. Replicating BKPyV isolates in viremic KTRs after transplantation were genotyped using real-time polymerase chain reaction and confirmed by means of sequencing. BKPyV serotype and genotype data were used to determine the source of infection and analyze the risk of viremia and BKPyVAN.

Results

Donor and recipient BKPyV genotype and serotype distribution was dominated by genotype I (>80%), especially Ib, over II, III and IV. Donor serotype was significantly correlated with the replicating genotype in viremic KTRs (P < .001). Individual donor and recipient serotype, serotype (mis)matching and the recipient replicating BKPyV genotype were not associated with development of viremia or BKPyVAN after transplantation.

Conclusions

BKPyV donor and recipient serotyping and genotyping indicates the donor origin of replicating BKPyV in viremic KTRs but provides no evidence for BKPyV genotype–specific virulence.

Non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective way to decrease the high morbidity and mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, KT does not completely reverse the damage done by years of decreased kidney function and dialysis. Furthermore, new offending agents (in particular, immunosuppression) added in the post-transplant period increase the risk of complications. Cardiovascular (CV) disease, the leading cause of death in KT recipients, warrants pre-transplant screening based on risk factors. Nevertheless, the screening methods currently used have many shortcomings and a perfect screening modality does not exist. Risk factor modification in the pre- and post-transplant periods is of paramount importance to decrease the rate of CV complications post-transplant, either by lifestyle modification (for example, diet, exercise, and smoking cessation) or by pharmacological means (for example, statins, anti-hyperglycemics, and so on). Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major contributor to mortality in this patient population. Although tacrolimus is a major contributor to PTDM development, changes in immunosuppression are limited by the higher risk of rejection with other agents. Immunosuppression has also been implicated in higher risk of malignancy; therefore, proper cancer screening is needed. Cancer immunotherapy is drastically changing the way certain types of cancer are treated in the general population; however, its use post-transplant is limited by the risk of allograft rejection. As expected, higher risk of infections is also encountered in transplant recipients. When caring for KT recipients, special attention is needed in screening methods, preventive measures, and treatment of infection with BK virus and cytomegalovirus. Hepatitis C virus infection is common in transplant candidates and in the deceased donor pool; however, newly developed direct-acting antivirals have been proven safe and effective in the pre- and post-transplant periods. The most important and recent developments on complications following KT are reviewed in this article.

Prevalence of antibodies against BKPyV subtype I and IV in kidney transplant recipients and in the general Czech population

Active infection with BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) may cause serious complications in transplantation settings. Recently, the level of BKPyV IgG seroreactivity in graft donors has been shown to predict viremia and BKPyV-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. Pretransplantation testing of the donor and recipient BKPyV serostatus could, therefore, identify patients at high risk. For the development of serological immunoassays, antibody response to the predominant BKPyV subtypes (BKPyV-I and BKPyV-IV) was studied using virus-like particle (VLP)-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). VLPs made from the capsid protein, VP1, derived from BKPyV-I and BKPyV-IV subtypes were produced using a baculovirus expression system and used as antigens. The tests were used for IgG antibody determination in 50 KTx recipients and 111 healthy blood donors. While 87% of samples reacted with mixed BKPyV-I and BKPyV-IV antigens, only 49% of samples were reactive in both ELISA tests when using BKPyV-I or BKPyV-IV antigens separately. Twenty-seven percent of healthy blood donors and 26% of KTx recipients were reactive only with BKPyV-I, while 9% and 20% were reactive only with BKPyV-IV, respectively. To determine the specificities of the antigens, selected seropositive samples were retested after preadsorption with soluble BKPyV-I, BKPyV-IV, or JC polyomavirus antigens. The experiments confirmed that recombinant VP1 VLP-based ELISAs predominantly detected BKPyV type-specific antibodies. The results imply that anti-BKPyV antibody ELISA tests should contain a mixture of subtype-specific VLP-based antigens instead of antigen derived from the most prevalent BKPyV-I subtype. The tests can be used for serological surveys of BKPyV infection and improved KTx patient management.

Role of BK polyomavirus (BKV) and Torque teno virus (TTV) in liver transplant recipients with renal impairment

PURPOSE

Renal impairment is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT). While BK polyomavirus (BKV) has been linked to renal failure in kidney transplant recipients, Torque teno virus (TTV) is a surrogate marker for immunosuppression that does not have a clear association with any human disease. The impact of BKV and TTV on renal impairment after LT is unknown.

METHODOLOGY

In this retrospective study, urine and serum samples from 136 liver transplant recipients were screened for BKV and TTV by quantitative PCR. In addition, serum was screened for BKV-specific antibodies and the VP1 typing region was sequenced for BKV genotyping. All parameters were correlated with clinical data.Results/Key findings. BK viruria was detected up to 21 years after transplantation in 16.9 % of cases. BK viraemia was detected in 8.7 % of patients with BK viruria up to 4 years after LT. BKV-specific antibodies were detected in 93.6 % of all LT recipients and correlated with BKV viral load in urine. There was no correlation between renal impairment and the detection of BK DNA in urine (OR 0.983). TTV DNA was detected in 84.6 % of serum samples and in 66.6 % of urine samples. The TTV viral load in serum correlated with the BKV viral load but had no impact on renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that the detection of BKV and TTV is not a risk factor for renal impairment after LT. A correlation of TTV and BKV viral load seems to be an indicator for the immune status of the host.

Neutralizing Antibody-Mediated Response and Risk of BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) causes renal allograft dysfunction. The current management of BKVAN relies on pre-emptive adaptation of immunosuppression according to viral load monitoring. However, this empiric strategy is not always successful. Therefore, pretransplant predictive markers are needed. In a prospective longitudinal study, we enrolled 168 kidney transplant recipients and 69 matched donors. To assess the value of BKV genotype-specific neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers as a predictive marker for BKV replication, we measured BKV DNA load and NAb titers at transplant and followed patients for 24 months. After transplant, 52 (31%) patients displayed BKV replication: 24 (46%) patients were viruric and 28 (54%) patients were viremic, including 13 with biopsy-confirmed BKVAN. At any time, patients with high NAb titers against the replicating strain had a lower risk of developing BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.26 to 0.73; P=0.002). Each log₁₀ increase in NAb titer decreased the risk of developing viremia by 56%. Replicating strains were consistent with donor transmission in 95% of cases of early BKV replication. Genotype mismatch between recipients' neutralization profiles before transplant and their subsequently replicating strain significantly increased the risk of developing viremia (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.88; P=0.04). A NAb titer against the donor's strain <4 log₁₀ before transplant significantly associated with BKV replication after transplant (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.45; P=0.03). BKV genotype-specific NAb titers may be a meaningful predictive marker that allows patient stratification by BKV disease risk before and after transplant.