1
|
Meinders AM, Graviss EA, Nguyen DT, Daw J, Lentine KL, Peipert JD, Gaber AO, Axelrod DA, Weng FL, Waterman AD. Determining Predictors of Actual Living Kidney Donation Based on Potential Donor Characteristics. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15439. [PMID: 39190896 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease; however, few living donor candidates (LDCs) who begin evaluation actually donate. While some LDCs are deemed medically ineligible, others discontinue for potentially modifiable reasons. METHODS At five transplant centers, we conducted a prospective cohort study measuring LDCs' clinical and psychosocial characteristics, educational preparation, readiness to donate, and social determinants of health. We followed LDCs for 12 months after evaluation to determine whether they donated a kidney, opted to discontinue, had modifiable reasons for discontinuing, were medically ineligible, or had other recipient-related reasons for discontinuing. RESULTS Among 2184 LDCs, 18.6% donated, 38.2% opted to or had modifiable reasons for discontinuing, and 43.2% were deemed ineligible due to medical or recipient-related reasons. Multivariable analyses comparing successful LDCs with those who did not complete donation for modifiable reasons (N = 1241) found that LDCs who discussed donation with the recipient before evaluation (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.54-3.46), had completed high school (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.35), or were a "close relation" to their recipient (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.33-2.69) were more likely to donate. Conversely, LDCs who reported religion as important (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.80), were Non-White (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00), or had overall higher anxiety scores (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99) were less likely to donate. CONCLUSION With fewer than a fifth of LDCs donating, developing programs to provide greater emotional support and facilitate open discussions between LDCs and recipients earlier may increase living donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Meinders
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Edward A Graviss
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
- Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Duc T Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan Daw
- Department of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- SSM Health Saint Louis University Transplant Center, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ahmed Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- J. C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David A Axelrod
- University of Iowa Organ Transplant Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Francis L Weng
- Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, RWJ Barnabas Health, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | - Amy D Waterman
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- J. C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khalil K, Brotherton A, Moore S, Evison F, Gallier S, Hodson J, Sharif A. Interaction between socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity for likelihood of receiving living-donor kidney transplantation. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:113. [PMID: 35305568 PMCID: PMC8934457 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02742-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The interplay between ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation for living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) opportunities is unclear.
Methods
Data for 2040 consecutive kidney-alone transplant recipients receiving an allograft between 1st January 2007 and 30th June 2020 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The associations between the proportions of transplants that were LDKT (versus deceased donation) and both ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation were assessed, with the latter quantified by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile.
Results
The cohort comprised recipients of White (64.7%), South Asian (21.7%), Black (7.0%) and other (6.6%) ethnic groups. Recipients tended to be from socioeconomically deprived areas, with the most deprived quintile being the most frequently observed (quintile 1: 38.6% of patients); non-White recipients were significantly more likely to live in socioeconomically deprived areas (p < 0.001). Overall, 36.5% of transplants were LDKT, with this proportion declining progressively with socioeconomic deprivation, from 50.4 to 27.6% in the least versus most deprived IMD quintile (p < 0.001). A significant difference across recipient ethnicities was also observed, with the proportion of LDKTs ranging from 43.2% in White recipients to 17.8% in Black recipients (p < 0.001). Both socioeconomic deprivation (p < 0.001) and ethnicity (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of LDKT on multivariable analysis, with a significant interaction between these factors also being observed (p < 0.001). Further assessment of this interaction effect found that, whilst there was a marked difference in the proportions of transplants that were LDKT between White versus non-White recipients in the most socioeconomically deprived groups (39.5% versus 19.3%), no such difference was seen in the least deprived recipients (48.5% versus 51.9%).
Conclusions
Whilst both socioeconomic deprivation and non-White ethnicity are independent predictors for lower proportions of LDKTs, the significant interaction between the two factors should be appreciated.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong K, Owen-Smith A, Caskey F, MacNeill S, Tomson CR, Dor FJ, Ben-Shlomo Y, Bouacida S, Idowu D, Bailey P. Investigating Ethnic Disparity in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation in the UK: Patient-Identified Reasons for Non-Donation among Family Members. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3751. [PMID: 33233422 PMCID: PMC7700269 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
There is ethnic inequity in access to living-donor kidney transplants in the UK. This study asked kidney patients from Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups why members of their family were not able to be living kidney donors. Responses were compared with responses from White individuals. This questionnaire-based mixed-methods study included adults transplanted between 1/4/13-31/3/17 at 14 UK hospitals. Participants were asked to indicate why relatives could not donate, selecting all options applicable from: Age; Health; Weight; Location; Financial/Cost; Job; Blood group; No-one to care for them after donation. A box entitled 'Other-please give details' was provided for free-text entries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the association between the likelihood of selecting each reason for non-donation and the participant's self-reported ethnicity. Qualitative responses were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. In total, 1240 questionnaires were returned (40% response). There was strong evidence that Black, Asian and minority ethnic group individuals were more likely than White people to indicate that family members lived too far away to donate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.25, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.30-4.58), were prevented from donating by financial concerns (aOR = 2.95, 95% CI 2.02-4.29), were unable to take time off work (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.18-3.02), were "not the right blood group" (aOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.01), or had no-one to care for them post-donation (aOR = 3.73, 95% CI 2.60-5.35). Four qualitative themes were identified from responses from Black, Asian and minority ethnic group participants: 'Burden of disease within the family'; 'Differing religious interpretations'; 'Geographical concerns'; and 'A culture of silence'. Patients perceive barriers to living kidney donation in the UK Black, Asian and minority ethnic population. If confirmed, these could be targeted by interventions to redress the observed ethnic inequity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Wong
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; (A.O.-S.); (F.C.); (S.M.); (Y.B.-S.); (P.B.)
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Amanda Owen-Smith
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; (A.O.-S.); (F.C.); (S.M.); (Y.B.-S.); (P.B.)
| | - Fergus Caskey
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; (A.O.-S.); (F.C.); (S.M.); (Y.B.-S.); (P.B.)
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Stephanie MacNeill
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; (A.O.-S.); (F.C.); (S.M.); (Y.B.-S.); (P.B.)
| | - Charles R.V. Tomson
- The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK;
| | | | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; (A.O.-S.); (F.C.); (S.M.); (Y.B.-S.); (P.B.)
| | - Soumeya Bouacida
- Bristol Health Partners’ Chronic Kidney Disease Health Integration Team, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
| | - Dela Idowu
- Gift of Living Donation (GOLD), London NW10 0NS, UK
| | - Pippa Bailey
- Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; (A.O.-S.); (F.C.); (S.M.); (Y.B.-S.); (P.B.)
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hays R, Gordon EJ, Ison MG, LaPointe Rudow D. Impact of the OPTN transmissible diseases policy and US PHS increased risk donor guidelines on living donor candidates. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:3233-3239. [PMID: 31338956 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Donor-derived human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmissions in transplantation have led to policies mandating assessment of donor behavioral history, and disclosure of donor increased risk (IR) status to recipients. Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy safeguards were promulgated in the context of deceased donation, with its narrow time window for organ utilization and uncertainty about donor history. These policies have been applied to living donation without substantive data on risk of disease transmission in living donor transplantation. Unlike for deceased donors, the OPTN does not collect data on living donor IR status. Given the feasibility of thorough living donor evaluation via already-mandated lab tests and clinical assessments, living donor IR assessment and associated disclosures may have limited benefit in improving recipient informed consent. Applying the current IR policy to living donors may also introduce unintended consequences to donors and recipients, causing donors psychological harm, delays in donation to avoid IR status disclosure, and potential withdrawal from donation. We suggest strategies that reduce risk of harm to donor candidates while maintaining policy compliance, and review additional approaches for evaluating risk of disease transmission in living donor candidates. Data on the risk of disease transmission by living donors are needed to inform policy modification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Hays
- Department of Coordinated Care, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael G Ison
- Department of Coordinated Care, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Dianne LaPointe Rudow
- Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute New York, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplantation is the best type of renal replacement therapy. However, large numbers of potential living kidney donors (LKDs) are declined because of various reasons. The aim of this study is to define and quantify the reasons for declining potential LKDs. METHODS All potential LKDs evaluated at our center between September 2008 and December 2016 were reviewed. Data were collected from the electronic database. RESULTS A total of 2090 potential LKDs were evaluated, with an average age of 32 years (range, 18-67 years) and men constituting 72.6%. A total of 675 (32.3%) were accepted for donor nephrectomy. Living kidney donation did not proceed in 830 (39.7%): 661 (79.6%) because of donor-related reasons and 169 (20.4%) because of recipient-related reasons. Donor-related reasons included medical contraindications (61.7%), immunological barriers (23.1%), surgical contraindications (7.9%), and psychosocial reasons (7.3%). A total of 585 (28.0%) potential LKDs voluntarily withdrew themselves at variable time points during the evaluation process, even after being accepted for donation. Male and young (18-35 years) potential LKDs were more likely to withdraw compared with female and older (>35 years) potential LKDs (34.3% vs 11.4%, P < .005 and 29.6% vs 24.5%, P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Despite the large number of potential LKDs, medically complex donors are increasing, and a significant proportion decided to withdraw at some point during the evaluation process. The latter highlights the need to increase public awareness about living donation, to perform more careful initial screening and targeted educational programs, and to provide continuous support for potential LKDs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Thiessen C, Kulkarni S. The Psychosocial Impact of Withdrawing from Living Kidney Donation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-018-0185-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
7
|
Optimizing Efficiency in the Evaluation of Living Donor Candidates: Best Practices and Implications. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-018-0184-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Hanson CS, Ralph AF, Manera KE, Gill JS, Kanellis J, Wong G, Craig JC, Chapman JR, Tong A. The Lived Experience of "Being Evaluated" for Organ Donation: Focus Groups with Living Kidney Donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12:1852-1861. [PMID: 28993303 PMCID: PMC5672970 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03550417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Comprehensive evaluations are required to safeguard voluntarism and minimize harm to living kidney donors. This process is lengthy, invasive, and emotionally challenging, with up to one fifth of potential donors opting out. We aimed to describe donors' experiences of the evaluation process. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We conducted 14 focus groups involving 123 kidney donors who completed donation from three transplant centers (Australia and Canada). Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS We identified six themes reflecting donors' experiences of evaluation. The themes that related to perseverance included emotional investment (prioritizing the recipient's health, desperation for a normal life, protecting eligibility, shame of disappointing others, and overcoming opposition), undeterred by low risks (medical confidence and protection, worthwhile gamble, inherent invincibility, and normalizing risks), and mental preparation (avoiding regret, resolving decisional ambivalence, and managing expectations of recovery). The challenges included underlying fears for health (processing alarming information, unsettling uncertainty, and preoperative panic), system shortfalls (self-advocacy in driving the process, stressful urgency, inconsistent framing of safety, unnerving bodily scrutiny, questioning risk information, and draining finances); and lifestyle interference (living in limbo, onerous lifestyle disruption, and valuing flexibility). CONCLUSIONS Previous donors described an emotional investment in donating and determination to protect their eligibility, despite having concerns for their health, financial and lifestyle disruption, and opposition from their family or community. Our findings suggest the need to prepare donors for surgery and recovery, minimize anxiety and lifestyle burdens, ensure that donors feel comfortable expressing their fears and concerns, reduce unnecessary delays, and make explicit the responsibilities of donors in their assessment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla S. Hanson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angelique F. Ralph
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karine E. Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John S. Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John Kanellis
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health and Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; and
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy R. Chapman
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thiessen C, Jaji Z, Joyce M, Zimbrean P, Reese P, Gordon EJ, Kulkarni S. Opting out: a single-centre pilot study assessing the reasons for and the psychosocial impact of withdrawing from living kidney donor evaluation. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2017; 43:756-761. [PMID: 28258071 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Understanding why individuals opt out of living donation is crucial to enhancing protections for all living donors and to identify modifiable barriers to donation. We developed an ethical approach to conducting research on individuals who opted out of living kidney donation and applied it in a small-scale qualitative study at one US transplant centre. The seven study participants (64% response rate) had varied reasons for opting out, the most prominent of which was concern about the financial burden from lost wages during the postoperative period. Several reported feeling alone during their decision-making process. Although no participants used an alibi, a centre-provided statement of non-eligibility to donate, all believed that centres should offer alibis to help preserve donor autonomy. Given the complexity of participants' decisions and the emotions they experienced before and after deciding not to donate, we suggest approaches for independent living donor advocates to support this population. This study demonstrates that research on individuals who opt out of donation is feasible and yields valuable insight into methods to improve the evaluation experience for potential living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Thiessen
- Department of Surgery, Section of Organ Transplantation and Immunology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zainab Jaji
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael Joyce
- Department of Surgery, Section of Organ Transplantation and Immunology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Paula Zimbrean
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Peter Reese
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sanjay Kulkarni
- Department of Surgery, Section of Organ Transplantation and Immunology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bailey PK, Tomson CRV, MacNeill S, Marsden A, Cook D, Cooke R, Biggins F, O'Sullivan J, Ben-Shlomo Y. A multicenter cohort study of potential living kidney donors provides predictors of living kidney donation and non-donation. Kidney Int 2017; 92:1249-1260. [PMID: 28709642 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This multicenter prospective potential living kidney donor cohort study investigated which sociodemographic and other factors predict progression to living kidney donation or donor withdrawal as little is known on this topic. Therefore, we examined data on individuals undergoing living donor assessment at seven hospitals in the United Kingdom. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the relationships between donor and recipient characteristics and likelihood of kidney donation. A total of 805 individuals presented for directed donation to 498 intended recipients, of which 112 received a transplant from a living donor. Potential donors were less likely to donate if their intended recipient was female rather than male with an odds ratio of 0.60, a friend rather than relative 0.18, or had renal failure due to a systemic disease rather than another cause 0.41. The most socioeconomically deprived quintile was less likely to donate than the least 0.49, but the trend with deprivation was consistent with chance. Higher body mass index was associated with a lower likelihood of donation (odds ratio per each kg/m2 increase, 0.92). Younger potential donors (odds ratio per each year increase 0.97), those of nonwhite ethnicity 2.98, and friend donors 2.43 were more likely to withdraw from work-up. This is the first study in the United Kingdom of potential living kidney donors to describe predictors of non-donation. Qualitative work with individuals who withdraw might identify possible ways of supporting those who wish to donate but experience difficulties doing so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillippa K Bailey
- University of Bristol and Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
| | - Charles R V Tomson
- The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Ann Marsden
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Dominique Cook
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rhian Cooke
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Fiona Biggins
- Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Jim O'Sullivan
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scandling JD. All's well following living kidney donation? Transpl Int 2017; 30:972-974. [PMID: 28608627 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
12
|
Efficient method to create integration-free, virus-free, Myc and Lin28-free human induced pluripotent stem cells from adherent cells. Future Sci OA 2017; 3:FSO211. [PMID: 28884008 PMCID: PMC5583652 DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Nonviral induced pluripotent stem cell (IPSC) reprogramming is not efficient without the oncogenes, Myc and Lin28. We describe a robust Myc and Lin28-free IPSC reprogramming approach using reprogramming molecules. METHODS IPSC colony formation was compared in the presence and absence of Myc and Lin28 by the mixture of reprogramming molecules and episomal vectors. RESULTS While more colonies were observed in cultures transfected with the aforementioned oncogenes, the Myc and Lin28-free method achieved the same reprogramming efficiency as reports that used these oncogenes. Further, all colonies were fully reprogrammed based on expression of SSEA4, even in the absence of Myc and Lin28. CONCLUSION This approach satisfies an important regulatory pathway for developing IPSC cell therapies with lower clinical risk.
Collapse
|