Evolution of Glycemic Control and Variability After Kidney Transplant

Continuous glucose monitoring (Dexcom g6) in people with diabetes after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Use of continuous glucose monitoring-CGM in patients on kidney replacement therapy including kidney transplant recipients, may improve glycemic control and detection of hypoglycemia. However, studies in this population in particular in kidney transplant recipients are very limited.

METHODS

The study aimed to evaluate glycemic profiles using the Dexcom G6 CGM system for 30 d a personal smartphone in people with diabetes after kidney transplantation and to assess the impact of monthly use of the CGM system on glycemic control and quality of life in this group.

RESULTS

Over 8 months, 9 people after kidney transplantation were included in the study (7 women, median age 57 years), 8 people with new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), and 1 person with diabetes mellitus type 1. The time since kidney transplantation in each of the study participants was less than 2 years. In 7 people with NODAT, the time in range was above 70%. In all study participants, hyperglycemia was observed mainly in the afternoon (2-6 pm). In some patients, pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISAs) were noted. There was no effect of the use of Dexcom G6 on the HbA1c value. There was no impact of the use of the Dexcom G6 system on the perception of overall quality of life, but monthly use had a positive impact on the perception of the quality of health.

CONCLUSIONS

CGM systems seem to be a promising method for assessing glycemic control in people with diabetes after kidney transplantation. More extensive research is needed to assess safety and usefulness in everyday practice.

Fueling the success of transplantation through nutrition: recent insights into nutritional interventions, their interplay with gut microbiota and cellular mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of nutrition in organ health including solid organ transplantation is broadly accepted, but robust data on nutritional regimens remains scarce calling for further investigation of specific dietary approaches at the different stages of organ transplantation. This review gives an update on the latest insights into nutritional interventions highlighting the potential of specific dietary regimens prior to transplantation aiming for organ protection and the interplay between dietary intake and gut microbiota.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nutrition holds the potential to optimize patients' health prior to and after surgery, it may enhance patients' ability to cope with the procedure-associated stress and it may accelerate their recovery from surgery. Nutrition helps to reduce morbidity and mortality in addition to preserve graft function. In the case of living organ donation, dietary preconditioning strategies promise novel approaches to limit ischemic organ damage during transplantation and to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms of diet-induced organ protection. Functioning gut microbiota are required to limit systemic inflammation and to generate protective metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids or hydrogen sulfide.

SUMMARY

Nutritional intervention is a promising therapeutic concept including the pre- and rehabilitation stage in order to improve the recipients' outcome after solid organ transplantation.

Continuous glucose monitoring for the prediction of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance on day 90 after kidney transplantation-A prospective proof-of-concept study

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and prediabetes represent serious complications after kidney transplantation and are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We assessed the predictive performance of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared with plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c in 46 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without known preexisting diabetes mellitus. CGM (14-day recording duration) was performed on days 8, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 180 posttransplant. Eight patients (17%) developed PTDM and nine (20%) impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), as diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT)-derived 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) or glucose-lowering therapy on day 90. CGM-readouts percent of time >140 mg/dL (%TAR (140 mg/dL)) and percent of time >180 mg/dL (%TAR (180 mg/dL)) showed excellent in-sample test characteristics regarding PTDM from day 8 onward (days 8-90 receiver operating characteristic area under the curve: 0.88-0.99) and regarding PTDM/IGT with the commencement of maintenance immunosuppression from day 30 onward (days 30-90 receiver operating characteristic area under the curve: 0.88-0.91). Exploratory CGM-%TAR (140 mg/dL)-screening thresholds of 31.8% on day 8 and 13.2% on day 30 yielded sensitivities/specificities of 88%/83% for PTDM and 94%/78% for PTDM/IGT on day 90, respectively. Although our findings need to be replicated in studies with larger sample sizes, CGM bears promising potential to facilitate clinical practice and research regarding PTDM.

Early post-transplant hyperglycemia and post-transplant diabetes mellitus following heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Heart transplantation is an important treatment for end-stage heart failure. Early post-transplant hyperglycemia (EPTH) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common following heart transplantation and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of EPTH and PTDM in cardiac transplant patients, incorporating findings from non-cardiac solid organ transplant studies where relevant due to limited heart-specific research.

EXPERT OPINION

EPTH following heart transplantation is common yet understudied and is associated with the later development of PTDM. PTDM is associated with adverse outcomes including infection, renal dysfunction, microvascular disease, and an increased risk of re-transplantation and mortality. Risk factors for EPTH include the post-operative immunosuppression regimen, recipient and donor age, body mass index, infections, and chronic inflammation. Early insulin treatment is recommended for EPTH, whereas PTDM management is varied and includes lifestyle modification, anti-glycemic agents, and insulin. Given the emerging evidence on the transplant benefits associated with effective glucose control, and the cardioprotective potential of newer anti-glycemic agents, further focus on the management of EPTH and PTDM within heart transplant recipients is imperative.

Nutrition in the Management of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplantation offers patients with end stage kidney disease the best outcomes. Concentration on nutrition is pivotal throughout the transplant life course. Nutritional requirements change during each phase of transplantation, from pretransplant evaluation and wait-time, acute transplantation, maintenance and ultimately declining graft function, and care should be taken to consider each stage. In this article we concentrate on addressing each phase, with additional focus on current hot topics of dysglycaemia management and on the impact of diet on gut microbiome.

Vegetable Intake, but Not Fruit Intake Is Inversely Associated With Fasting Plasma Glucose in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The association between dietary intake and glycemic control has been extensively investigated in type 2 diabetes. However, little is known about this association in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We performed an observational study involving 263 adult KTRs with a functioning allograft for at least 1 year at the outpatient clinic of the Hospital from November 2020 to March 2021. Dietary intake was assessed by food frequency questionnaire. Linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between fruit and vegetable intake and fasting plasma glucose.

RESULTS

The vegetable and fruit intake were 238.24 g/d (102.38-416.67) and 511.94 g/d (321.19-849.05), respectively. The fasting plasma glucose was 5.15 ± 0.95 mmol/L. The linear regressions revealed that vegetable intake, but not fruit intake was inversely associated with fasting plasma glucose in KTRs (adjusted R2 = 0.203, P < .001). The clear dose-response relation was observed. Moreover, each 100 g increase in vegetable intake was associated with 11.6% reduction of fasting plasma glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

Vegetable intake, but not fruit intake, is inversely associated with fasting plasma glucose in KTRs.

Living with Type 2 Diabetes: Podcast of a Patient-Physician Discussion

For patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the journey to diagnosis may not be straightforward. Patients can present with one of many diabetic complications before a diagnosis of T2D is made. These include heart disease and chronic kidney disease, in addition to cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy, and neuropathies, all of which can be asymptomatic in the early stages. In their clinical guidelines on standards of care in diabetes, the American Diabetes Association recommends regular screening for conditions such as kidney disease in patients with T2D. Furthermore, the frequent coexistence of diabetes and cardiorenal and/or metabolic conditions often requires a holistic approach to patient management, with specialists from multiple disciplines, including cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians, working together. In addition to the use of pharmacological therapies, which can improve prognosis, the management of T2D should include attention to patient self-care, including appropriate dietary changes, consideration of continuous glucose monitoring, and advice on physical exercise. In this podcast, a patient and a clinician discuss a lived experience of the diagnosis of T2D, and the importance of patient education for understanding and managing T2D and its complications. The discussion highlights the central role of the Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist, and the role of ongoing emotional support in managing life with T2D, including patient education through reputable online resources and peer support groups. Podcast video with Pamela Kushner (PK) and Anne Dalin (AD) (MP4 92088 KB).

Composite Metric of Glycemic Control Q-Score Is Elevated in Pediatric and Adolescent/Young Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Background: Malglycemia in pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is associated with increased infection and mortality rate. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been safely used in pediatric/AYA HSCT recipients, but there is a need for a composite metric that can easily be used in clinical settings to assess the glycemic control and identify high-risk patients who needs therapeutic intervention. Composite metrics derived from CGM have not been studied in pediatric/AYA HSCT patients. Methods: Patients aged 2-30 years old who are admitted inpatient while undergoing HSCT at Children's Hospital Colorado underwent CGM using the Abbot Freestyle Libre Pro device from up to 7 days before and 60 days after HSCT. A composite metric Q-score, comprising five primary factors of CGM profiles (central tendency, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, intradaily variations, and interdaily variations), was calculated for each patient for the duration of CGM wear. Results: Twenty-nine patients received CGM for an average of 25 days per participant. The median Q-score was 10.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.3, 14.3). Sixty-nine percent of patients had Q-scores that would be categorized into the Fair or Poor category. There was no difference in the Q-score by sources of stem cell, types of primary disease, types of preparative regimen, need for PICU admission, presence of documented infections, and total parenteral nutrition use in the peri-HSCT period. Conclusions: Most pediatric/AYA HSCT recipients have Q-scores indicating suboptimal glycemic control in the peri-HSCT period. Future study should focus on developing screening and treatment strategies to improve malglycemia and its associated adverse clinical outcomes. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03482154).

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Background and objectives: New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) represents a primary cause of morbidity and allograft loss. We assessed prevalence and risk factors for NODAT in a population of Italian kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Methods: Data from 522 KT performed between January 2004 and December 2014 were analyzed. Participants underwent clinical examination; blood and urine laboratory tests were obtained at baseline, one, six, and 12-month of follow-up to detect glucose homeostasis abnormalities and associated metabolic disorders. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at six months in 303 subjects. Results: Most patients were Caucasian (82.4%) with a mean age of 48 ± 12 years. The prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism (AGM) and NODAT was 12.6% and 10.7%, respectively. Comparing characteristics of patients with normal glucose metabolism (NGM) to those with NODAT, we found a significant difference in living donation (16.6% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.03) and age at transplant (46 ± 12 vs. 56 ± 9 years; p = 0.0001). Also, we observed that patients developing NODAT had received higher cumulative steroid doses (1-month: 1165 ± 593 mg vs. 904 ± 427 mg; p = 0.002; 6-month:2194 ± 1159 mg vs. 1940 ± 744 mg; p = 0.002). The NODAT group showed inferior allograft function compared to patients with NGM (1-year eGFR: 50.1 ± 16.5 vs. 57 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m²; p = 0.02). NODAT patients were more likely to exhibit elevated systolic blood pressure and higher total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than controls. Conclusions: The prevalence of NODAT in our cohort was relatively high. Patient age and early post-transplant events such as steroid abuse are associated with NODAT development.

Novel management of diabetes in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a prevalent complication in kidney transplant recipients, and has been associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

While hyperglycemia is frequently seen in the early posttransplant period because of surgical stress, infection, and use of high-dose steroids, the diagnosis of PTDM should be established after patients are clinically stable and on stable maintenance immunosuppression. In the early posttransplant period, hyperglycemia is typically treated with insulin, and pilot data have suggested potential benefit of lower vs. higher glycemic targets in this setting. Growing data indicate lifestyle modifications, including dietary interventions, physical activity, and mitigation of obesity, are associated with improved posttransplant outcomes. While there are limited data to support a first-line antidiabetic medication for PTDM, more established pharmacotherapies such as sulfonylureas, meglitinides, and dipetidyl peptidase IV inhibitors are commonly used. Given recent trials showing the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists upon kidney outcomes in nontransplant patients, further study of these agents specifically in kidney transplant recipients are urgently needed.

SUMMARY

Increasing evidence supports a multidisciplinary approach, including lifestyle modification, obesity treatment, judicious immunosuppression selection, and careful utilization of novel antidiabetic therapies in PTDM patients.

Global Epidemiology, Health Outcomes, and Treatment Options for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Kidney Failure

The burden of type 2 diabetes and related complications has steadily increased over the last few decades and is one of the foremost global public health threats in the 21st century. Diabetes is one of the leading causes of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure and is an important contributor to the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this population. In addition, up to one in three patients who have received kidney transplants develop post-transplant diabetes, but the management of this common complication continues to pose a significant challenge for clinicians. In this review, we will describe the global prevalence and temporal trend of kidney failure attributed to diabetes mellitus in both developing and developed countries. We will examine the survival differences between treated kidney failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes, focusing on the survival differences in those on maintenance dialysis or have received kidney transplants. With the increased availability of novel hypoglycemic agents, we will address the potential impacts of these novel agents in patients with diabetes and kidney failure and in those who have developed post-transplant diabetes.

The relationship between periodontal status and hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Several factors have been associated with hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation (KTx), including systemic inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between periodontal status and hyperglycemia in KTx patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four KTx patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Periodontitis severity was categorized into stage I to IV. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was measured, and hyperglycemia was analyzed at different FBG cutoff points (100 mg/dL, 110 mg/dL, 120 mg/dL, 126 mg/dL, 140 mg/dL). Age, history of smoking, prior type 2 diabetes (T2D), and prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) were considered cofounders. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was performed with periodontitis as the exposure and hyperglycemia as the outcome. Pathway analysis was performed with FBG as a continuous outcome.

RESULTS

Periodontitis had increased odds of hyperglycemia from 120 mg/dL FBG cutoff, even after adjustment. In addition, periodontitis severity was positively associated with FBG level (β = 0.323, SE = 0.127, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that periodontitis may be related to increase of hyperglycemia and FBG levels in KTx patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Periodontitis severity and cardiovascular disease were positively associated with FBG levels in KTx patients. Clinicians and patients should be aware of the potential benefit of periodontal care for better glycemic control management.

Protocol for a pilot single-centre, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial of dietary inulin to improve gut health in solid organ transplantation: the DIGEST study

Introduction

Kidney transplantation remains the best treatment for end-stage kidney disease, however the requirement for indefinite immunosuppression increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and infection, leading to a reduction in long-term patient and graft survival. The gut microbiome is a critical determinant of health and modulates host immunity and metabolism through a number of recognised pathways, including through the production of immunomodulatory short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Dietary supplementation with non-digestible fibre can augment the microbial production of SCFA and lead to favourable immune and metabolic outcomes, although this has yet to be shown in human kidney transplant recipients.

Methods and analysis

Dietary inulin for gut health in solid-organ transplantation (DIGEST) is a single-centre, unblinded, pilot parallel-arm randomised controlled trial designed to assess the feasibility and adherence of dietary inulin, a naturally occurring dietary fibre, in the early post-transplant period in kidney transplant recipients. Participants will be randomised at day 28 post-transplant to a 4-week period of dietary inulin (10–20 g/day) in addition to standard care, or standard care alone, and followed-up until week 12 post-transplant.

The primary outcomes of the study are: (i) the feasibility of participant recruitment, randomisation and retention; (ii) adherence to the intervention (inulin) and (iii) the tolerability of inulin determined by changes in gastrointestinal symptoms as scored on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale.

Secondary outcomes include: (1) glycaemic variability determined by continuous glucose monitoring; (2) abundance of SCFA-producing microbiota, as determined by 16s rRNA sequencing of the faecal metagenome; (3) serum SCFA concentrations; (4) peripheral blood immune cell populations; (5) recipient inflammatory and metabolic profiles and (6) the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection and kidney function determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Ethics and dissemination

All study visits, clinical and laboratory assessments will be integrated into usual post-transplant care, creating no additional healthcare encounters or procedures. The risks associated with this study are minor. Inulin has been shown to be well tolerated across a variety of cohorts, with the occurrence of short-term adverse gastrointestinal symptoms self-limiting. However, with gastrointestinal adverse events common following kidney transplantation, the tolerability of inulin in this cohort remains unknown. The results of DIGEST will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences. This study has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District’s Ethics Committee (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Zone).

Trial registration number

ACTRN12620000623998.

Current Pharmacological Intervention and Medical Management for Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients

Hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation is common in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both pretransplant and post-transplant diabetes mellitus are associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality. Glucose management may be challenging for kidney transplant recipients. The pathophysiology and pattern of hyperglycemia in patients following kidney transplantation is different from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with pre-existing and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, there is limited data on the management of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation. The following article discusses the nomenclature and diagnosis of pre- and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, the impact of transplant-related hyperglycemia on patient and kidney allograft outcomes, risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation, glucose management before and after transplantation, and modalities for prevention of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

Management of metabolic alterations in adult kidney transplant recipients: A joint position statement of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN), the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation (SITO) and the Italian Diabetes Society (SID)

Chronic metabolic alterations such as post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), dyslipidaemias and overweight/obesity significantly impact on kidney transplant (KT) outcomes. This joint position statement is based on the evidence on the management of metabolic alterations in KT recipients (KTRs) published after the release of the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of KTRs. Members of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN), the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation (SITO) and the Italian Diabetes Society (SID) selected to represent professionals involved in the management of KTRs undertook a systematic review of the published evidence for the management of PTDM, dyslipidaemias and obesity in this setting. The aim of this work is to provide an updated review of the evidence on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of metabolic alterations in KTRs, in order to support physicians, patients and the Healthcare System in the decision-making process when choosing among the various available options.

The Degree of Hyperglycemia Excursion in Patients of Kidney Transplantation (KT) or Liver Transplantation (LT) Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM): Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

This study used a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to investigate the glucose profiles and assess the degree of hyperglycemic excursion after kidney or liver transplantation during the early period after operation.

METHODS

Patients to whom a CGMS was attached during a postoperative period of approximately one month after transplantation were included. The CGM data of 31 patients including 24 with kidney transplantation (KT) and seven with liver transplantation (LT) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Hyperglycemia over 126 mg/dL (fasting) or 200 g/dL (postprandial) occurred in 42.1% (8/19) and 16.7% (1/6) of KT and LT patients, respectively, during this early period after transplantation, except for patients with preexisting diabetes (5 KT, 1 LT). The average mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) and mean absolute glucose (MAG) levels were 91.18 ± 26.51 vs. 65.66 ± 22.55 (P < 0.05) and 24.62 ± 7.78 vs. 18.18 ± 7.07 (P < 0.05) in KT vs. LT patients, respectively, in patients without preexisting DM or PTDM patients who showed normal glucose levels. Average increase from the lowest level to the peak glucose value was higher in KT patients than LT patients (P < 0.05). Conclusions. The transplanted organ also needs to be considered as an important factor affecting glucose control and the occurrence of more severe glucose excursions in patients who receive transplantation although immunosuppression agents are well-known important factors; however, our study was limited to the early posttransplantation period. Further studies involving CGM follow-up at regular intervals based on the time since transplantation are needed.