1
|
Vella I, di Francesco F, Accardo C, Boggi U, Gruttadauria S. Indications and results of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01785-8. [PMID: 38801602 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01785-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
The shortage of deceased liver donor organs over the years has always posed the need to expand the donor pool. A viable alternative to deceased donors is that of the living donor. Indeed, the living donor in liver transplantation, initially in pediatric transplantation, but for several years now also in adult transplantation, is a more than viable alternative to deceased liver donation. In fact, right liver lobe donation has proven to be a surgical procedure with low impact on the donor's life in terms of morbidity and mortality, with excellent results in recipients of such organs. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been published that show excellent results in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation, encouraging this practice not only in countries that have historically had a shortage of deceased donor organs, such as Asian countries, but making it a practice of increasing use in Western countries as well. In addition, thanks to improvements in surgical technique and the experience of high-volume centers, this surgery has also begun to be performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques, allowing us to envision ever better outcomes for both donor and recipient in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Vella
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Via E. Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio di Francesco
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Via E. Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Caterina Accardo
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Via E. Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Via E. Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zimbrean PC, Rubman S, Andacoglu O, Bakhai D, Clifton E, Deng Y, Doshi M, Emamaullee J, Gan G, Holmes R, Jaber L, Jackson WE, Joyce M, Kalil R, Kumar V, Laflen J, Lentine KL, Prashar R, Winder GS, Yadav A, Liapakis A. Psychosocial evaluation of living liver donors-State of current practices in the United States. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:505-518. [PMID: 37861339 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
We surveyed living donor liver transplant programs in the United States to describe practices in the psychosocial evaluation of living donors focused on (1) composition of psychosocial team; (2) domains, workflow, and tools of the psychosocial assessment; (3) absolute and relative mental health-related contraindications to donation; and (4) postdonation psychosocial follow-up. We received 52 unique responses, representing 33 of 50 (66%) of active living donor liver transplant programs. Thirty-one (93.9%) provider teams included social workers, 22 (66.7%) psychiatrists, and 14 (42.4%) psychologists. Validated tools were rarely used, but domains assessed were consistent. Respondents rated active alcohol (93.8%), cocaine (96.8%), and opioid (96.8%) use disorder, as absolute contraindications to donation. Active suicidality (97%), self-injurious behavior (90.9%), eating disorders (87.9%), psychosis (84.8%), nonadherence (71.9%), and inability to cooperate with the evaluation team (78.1%) were absolute contraindications to donation. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute psychosocial contraindications to liver donation between geographical areas or between large and small programs. Programs conduct postdonation psychosocial follow-up (57.6%) or screening (39.4%), but routine follow-up of declined donors is rarely conducted (15.8%). Psychosocial evaluation of donor candidates is a multidisciplinary process. The structure of the psychosocial evaluation of donors is not uniform among programs though the domains assessed are consistent. Psychosocial contraindications to living liver donation vary among the transplant programs. Mental health follow-up of donor candidates is not standardized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula C Zimbrean
- Departments of Psychiatry and Surgery (Transplant), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susan Rubman
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Oya Andacoglu
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Darshit Bakhai
- Department of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin Clifton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mona Doshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC/Children's Hospital-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Geliang Gan
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rachel Holmes
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lana Jaber
- Department of Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Joyce
- Department of Social Work, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Roberto Kalil
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jennie Laflen
- Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Internal Medicine, SM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rohini Prashar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Gerald S Winder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Anju Yadav
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim DS, Yoon YI, Kim BK, Choudhury A, Kulkarni A, Park JY, Kim J, Sinn DH, Joo DJ, Choi Y, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Yoon KT, Yim SY, Park CS, Kim DG, Lee HW, Choi WM, Chon YE, Kang WH, Rhu J, Lee JG, Cho Y, Sung PS, Lee HA, Kim JH, Bae SH, Yang JM, Suh KS, Al Mahtab M, Tan SS, Abbas Z, Shresta A, Alam S, Arora A, Kumar A, Rathi P, Bhavani R, Panackel C, Lee KC, Li J, Yu ML, George J, Tanwandee T, Hsieh SY, Yong CC, Rela M, Lin HC, Omata M, Sarin SK. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:299-383. [PMID: 38416312 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Jun Yong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongman Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Joong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Tae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Yim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheon-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok-Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Mook Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Eun Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Hyoung Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Pil Soo Sung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Ah Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Mo Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Mamun Al Mahtab
- Department of Hepatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Soek Siam Tan
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ananta Shresta
- Department of Hepatology, Alka Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Shahinul Alam
- Crescent Gastroliver and General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Anil Arora
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Pravin Rathi
- TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ruveena Bhavani
- University of Malaya Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Kuei Chuan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jun Li
- College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Lung Yu
- Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - H C Lin
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Masao Omata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
- University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rastogi A, Gupta AA, Piplani T, Yadav KS, K V F, Bhangui P, Soin AS. Hilar Anatomy in 3035 Living Liver Donors: A Novel Classification for Donor Surgery and Suitability, Hepatic Surgeries, and Hepatobiliary Interventions. Transplantation 2024; 108:455-463. [PMID: 37953482 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examines the vascular and biliary variations in 3035 liver donors. We propose a novel classification of hepatic arteries, portal veins, and bile ducts and clinically relevant donor classification. METHODS Preoperative imaging and operative details of 3035 donors from 2005 to 2020 were reviewed. Hilar anatomical variations were identified and grouped on the basis of incidence and clinical relevance. RESULTS Hilar structures are classified according to the numbers supplying or draining the graft: for the hepatic artery, right (R) and left (L), RA1/LA1 (1 artery), RA2/LA2 (2 arteries), and RA3/LA3 (3 arteries), respectively, further defined on the basis of the inflow trunk into C (for common hepatic artery), S (for superior mesenteric artery), and L (for left gastric artery); for the portal vein, RP1 (1 vein) and RP2 (2 veins) for the right lobe; and for the hepatic duct, RB1/LB1 (1 duct), RB2/LB2 (2 ducts), RB3 (3 right ducts), and RB4 (4 right ducts). Donors were classified on the basis of anatomical variations into 3 groups: class 1 and class 2 donors, who can donate liver with acceptable risks, and class 3 donors, who are high-risk donors because they are anatomically unacceptable ( Figures S1 to S4, SDC , http://links.lww.com/TP/C918 ). CONCLUSIONS Defining hilar anatomical variations and donor grouping into anatomy-based clinical classes helps in operative planning of donors, hepatobiliary surgeries, and interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Rastogi
- Division of Liver Transplantation and HPB (Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary) Surgery, Institute of Liver Transplantation, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| | - Ankur A Gupta
- Division of Liver Transplantation and HPB (Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary) Surgery, Institute of Liver Transplantation, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| | - Tarun Piplani
- Division of Liver and GI Radiology, Institute of Radiology, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| | - Kamal S Yadav
- Division of Liver Transplantation and HPB (Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary) Surgery, Institute of Liver Transplantation, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| | - Fysal K V
- Division of Liver Transplantation and HPB (Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary) Surgery, Institute of Liver Transplantation, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Division of Liver Transplantation and HPB (Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary) Surgery, Institute of Liver Transplantation, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| | - Arvinder S Soin
- Division of Liver Transplantation and HPB (Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary) Surgery, Institute of Liver Transplantation, Medanta, Gurugram (Delhi NCR), Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yim SH, Min EK, Choi MC, Kim DG, Han DH, Joo DJ, Choi JS, Kim MS, Choi GH, Lee JG. Unusual grafts for living-donor liver transplantation. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:454. [PMID: 37875961 PMCID: PMC10594742 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01428-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Unusual grafts, including extended left liver plus caudate lobe, right anterior section, and right posterior section grafts, are alternatives to left and right lobe grafts for living-donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate unusual grafts from the perspectives of recipients and donors. METHODS From 2016 to 2021, 497 patients received living-donor liver transplantation at Severance Hospital. Among them, 10 patients received unusual grafts. Three patients received extended left liver plus caudate lobe grafts, two patients received right anterior section grafts, and five patients received right posterior section grafts. Liver volumetrics and anatomy were analyzed for all recipients and donors. We collected data on laboratory examinations (alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio), imaging studies, graft survival, and complications. A 1:2 ratio propensity-score matching method was used to reduce selection bias and balance variables between the unusual and conventional graft groups. RESULTS The median of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of unusual graft recipients was 13.5 (interquartile range 11.5-19.3) and that of graft-recipient weight ratio was 0.767 (0.7-0.9). ABO incompatibility was observed in four cases. The alanine aminotransferase level, total bilirubin level, and international normalized ratio decreased in both recipients and donors. Unusual and conventional grafts had similar survival rates (p = 0.492). The right and left subgroups did not differ from each counter-conventional subgroup (p = 0.339 and p = 0.695, respectively). The incidence of major complications was not significantly different between unusual and conventional graft recipients (p = 0.513). Wound seromas were reported by unusual graft donors; the complication ratio was similar to that in conventional graft donors (p = 0.169). CONCLUSION Although unusual grafts require a complex indication, they may show feasible surgical outcomes for recipients with an acceptable donor complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Hyuk Yim
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Eun-Ki Min
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Mun Chae Choi
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Deok-Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Myong Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hakeem AR, Mathew JS, Aunés CV, Mazzola A, Alconchel F, Yoon YI, Testa G, Selzner N, Sarin SK, Lee KW, Soin A, Pomposelli J, Menon K, Goyal N, Kota V, Abu-Gazala S, Rodriguez-Davalos M, Rajalingam R, Kapoor D, Durand F, Kamath P, Jothimani D, Sudhindran S, Vij V, Yoshizumi T, Egawa H, Lerut J, Broering D, Berenguer M, Cattral M, Clavien PA, Chen CL, Shah S, Zhu ZJ, Ascher N, Bhangui P, Rammohan A, Emond J, Rela M. Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference. Transplantation 2023; 107:2203-2215. [PMID: 37635285 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Rahman Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Johns Shaji Mathew
- Department of GI, HPB & Multi-Organ Transplant, Rajagiri Hospitals, Kochi, India
| | - Carmen Vinaixa Aunés
- Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandra Mazzola
- Sorbonne Université, Unité Médicale de Transplantation Hépatique, Hépato-gastroentérologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Murcia, Spain
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Ajmera Transplant Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shiv Kumar Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Arvinder Soin
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - James Pomposelli
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Diseases, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neerav Goyal
- Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreatobiliary Surgery Unit (LTHPS), Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Venugopal Kota
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Samir Abu-Gazala
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Manuel Rodriguez-Davalos
- Liver Center, Primary Children's Hospital; Transplant Services, Intermountain Transplant Center, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Rajesh Rajalingam
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Dharmesh Kapoor
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Francois Durand
- Hepatology and Liver Intensive Care, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Kamath
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Dinesh Jothimani
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Surendran Sudhindran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | - Vivek Vij
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fortis Group of Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jan Lerut
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), Université catholique Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dieter Broering
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Unit, Ciberehd, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Universidad Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mark Cattral
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Ajmera Transplant Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplantation Centre, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Samir Shah
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India
| | - Zhi-Jun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Jean Emond
- Liver and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim SH, Kim KH, Cho HD. Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15080. [PMID: 37529969 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs). METHODS Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. RESULTS One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Hoon Kim
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pahari H, Sonavane A, Raj A, Agrawal AK, Sawant A, Gupta DK, Gharat A, Raut V. Subcutaneous Fat Obesity in a High Body Mass Index Donor Is Not a Contraindication to Living Donor Hepatectomy. Case Reports Hepatol 2023; 2023:9540002. [PMID: 37547905 PMCID: PMC10404149 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9540002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revolutionized the field of transplantation without compromising donor safety. Donor safety is of paramount concern to the transplant team. BMI >35 kg/m2 is mostly considered a contraindication to liver donation. Here, we present a successful right donor hepatectomy from a donor with a BMI of 36.5 kg/m2. Case Summary. A 39-year-old wife donated her right lobe of liver to her 43-year-old husband with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related chronic liver disease (CLD). His indications were refractory ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, acute kidney injury, recurrent elbow and urine infections leading to cachexia. She was initially rejected due to a high BMI but failed to lose weight over the next 2 months, and the need for a transplant in her husband was imminent. With no other potential living donors, we decided to proceed with donor evaluation as she had no other comorbidity. We were surprised to find normal liver function tests and a good liver attenuation index (LAI) of +16 on a computed tomography (CT) scan. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed a fat fraction of 3%. Volumetry confirmed a remnant of 37.9% and a potential graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 1.23. V/S ratio on CT scan (visceral fat area/subcutaneous fat area at L4-level) was <0.4 confirming subcutaneous fat obesity. Both surgeries were uneventful and both donor and recipient recovered well except recipient re-exploration on postoperative day (POD)-1 due to surgical bleeding. The donor was discharged on POD-6 and recipient was discharged on POD-15. At 3 weeks of follow-up, the donor's wound is clean and well-healed, and she is already back to doing her daily life activities without any pain with normal laboratory parameters. Conclusion Subcutaneous fat obesity should not be considered as a contraindication to liver donation even with a BMI >35 kg/m2. A small percentage of healthy individuals will not have visceral fat obesity and may not have steatotic livers. The CT scan and MR fat fraction estimation can confirm the findings. Biopsy may be avoided if MR fat estimation is <10% in obese donors. Intraoperative visualization in these donors remains the gold standard to decide the need for biopsy. Living donor hepatectomy may be safely performed in a select group of high BMI patients (>35 kg/m2) with pure subcutaneous fat obesity in the absence of other suitable living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirak Pahari
- Department of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amey Sonavane
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amruth Raj
- Department of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anup Kumar Agrawal
- Department of Radiology, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ambreen Sawant
- Department of Liver Transplant Anaesthesia, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deepak Kumar Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Gharat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikram Raut
- Department of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Medicover Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wen TC, Hsieh CE, Hsu YL, Lin KH, Hung YJ, Chen YL. The role of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for the management of biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation. BMC Surg 2023; 23:165. [PMID: 37330487 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02052-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) biliary complications can be troublesome over the post-operative course of patients, especially those with recurrent cholangitis or choledocholithiasis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) performed after LDLT as a last option to deal with post-LDLT biliary complications. METHODS Retrospectively, of the 594 adult LDLTs performed in a single medical center in Changhua, Taiwan from July 2005 to September 2021, 22 patients underwent post-LDLT RYHJ. Indications for RYHJ included choledocholithiasis formation with bile duct stricture, previous intervention failure, and other factors. Restenosis was defined if further intervention was needed to treat biliary complications after RYHJ was performed. Thereafter, patients were categorized into success group (n = 15) and restenosis group (n = 4). RESULTS The overall success rate of RYHJ in the management of post-LDLT biliary complications was 78.9% (15/19). Mean follow-up time was 33.4 months. As per our findings, four patients experienced recurrence after RYHJ (21.2%), and mean recurrence time was 12.5 months. Three cases were recorded as hospital mortality (13.6%). Outcome and risk analysis presented no significant differences between the two groups. A higher risk of recurrence tended to be related to patients with ABO incompatible (ABOi). CONCLUSION RYHJ served well as either a rescue but definite procedure for recurrent biliary complications or a safe and effective solution to biliary complications after LDLT. A higher risk of recurrence tended to be related to patients with ABOi; however, further research would be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Cheng Wen
- Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chia-En Hsieh
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplant Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, South Dist, Taichung City, 402306, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ya-Lan Hsu
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplant Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, South Dist, Taichung City, 402306, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kuo-Hua Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ju Hung
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplant Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, South Dist, Taichung City, 402306, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yao-Li Chen
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplant Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, South Dist, Taichung City, 402306, Taiwan, ROC.
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liapakis A, Agbim U, Bittermann T, Dew MA, Deng Y, Gan G, Emre S, Hunt HF, Olthoff KM, Locke JE, Jesse MT, Kumar V, Pillai A, Verna E, Lentine KL. A survey of transplant providers regarding attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to living donor liver transplantation in the United States. Clin Transplant 2023:e14967. [PMID: 36938716 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A successful living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is the culmination of a multifaceted process coordinated among key stakeholders. METHODS We conducted an electronic survey of US liver transplant (LT) centers (August 26, 2021-October 10, 2021) regarding attitudes, barriers, and facilitators of LDLT to learn how to expand LDLT safely and effectively in preparation for the American Society of Transplantation Living Donor Liver Transplant Consensus Conference. RESULTS Responses were received from staff at 58 programs (40.1% of US LT centers). There is interest in broadening LDLT (100% of LDLT centers, 66.7% of non-LDLT centers) with high level of agreement that LDLT mitigates donor shortage (93.3% of respondents) and that it should be offered to all suitable candidates (87.5% of respondents), though LDLT was less often endorsed as the best first option (29.5% of respondents). Key barriers at non-LDLT centers were institutional factors and surgical expertise, whereas those at LDLT centers focused on waitlist candidate and donor factors. Heterogeneity in candidate selection for LDLT, candidate reluctance to pursue LDLT, high donor exclusion rate, and disparities in access were important barriers. CONCLUSION Findings from this study may help guide current and future expansion of LDLT more efficiently in the US. These efforts require clear and cohesive messaging regarding LDLT benefits, engagement of the public community, and dedicated resources to equitably increase LDLT access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AnnMarie Liapakis
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Uchenna Agbim
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Yanhong Deng
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Geliang Gan
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sukru Emre
- Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Heather F Hunt
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elizabeth Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jesse MT, Jackson WE, Liapakis A, Ganesh S, Humar A, Goldaracena N, Levitsky J, Mulligan D, Pomfret EA, Ladner DP, Roberts JP, Mavis A, Thiessen C, Trotter J, Winder GS, Griesemer AD, Pillai A, Kumar V, Verna EC, LaPointe Rudow D, Han HH. Living donor liver transplant candidate and donor selection and engagement: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference. Clin Transplant 2023:e14954. [PMID: 36892182 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a promising option for mitigating the deceased donor organ shortage and reducing waitlist mortality. Despite excellent outcomes and data supporting expanding candidate indications for LDLT, broader uptake throughout the United States has yet to occur. METHODS In response to this, the American Society of Transplantation hosted a virtual consensus conference (October 18-19, 2021), bringing together relevant experts with the aim of identifying barriers to broader implementation and making recommendations regarding strategies to address these barriers. In this report, we summarize the findings relevant to the selection and engagement of both the LDLT candidate and living donor. Utilizing a modified Delphi approach, barrier and strategy statements were developed, refined, and voted on for overall barrier importance and potential impact and feasibility of the strategy to address said barrier. RESULTS Barriers identified fell into three general categories: 1) awareness, acceptance, and engagement across patients (potential candidates and donors), providers, and institutions, 2) data gaps and lack of standardization in candidate and donor selection, and 3) data gaps regarding post-living liver donation outcomes and resource needs. CONCLUSIONS Strategies to address barriers included efforts toward education and engagement across populations, rigorous and collaborative research, and institutional commitment and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle T Jesse
- Transplant Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - AnnMarie Liapakis
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale New Haven Transplant Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Swaytha Ganesh
- Thomas E Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Thomas E Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Josh Levitsky
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Mulligan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Daniela P Ladner
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John P Roberts
- UCSF Department of Surgery, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alisha Mavis
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Duke University Health, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carrie Thiessen
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - James Trotter
- Transplant Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Adam D Griesemer
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Heath, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology/Transplant, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dianne LaPointe Rudow
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hyosun H Han
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liapakis A, Jesse MT, Pillai A, Bittermann T, Dew MA, Emre S, Hunt H, Kumar V, Locke J, Mohammad S, Olthoff K, Verna EC, Lentine KL. Living donor liver transplantation: A multi-disciplinary collaboration towards growth, consensus, and a change in culture. Clin Transplant 2023:e14953. [PMID: 36890717 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) reduces liver transplant waitlist mortality and provides excellent long-term outcomes for persons with end stage liver disease. Yet, utilization of LDLT has been limited in the United States (US). METHODS In October 2021, the American Society of Transplantation held a consensus conference to identify important barriers to broader expansion of LDLT in the US, including data gaps, and make recommendations for impactful and feasible mitigation strategies to overcome these barriers. Domains addressed encompassed the entirety of the LDLT process. Representation from international centers and living donor kidney transplantation were included for their perspective/experience in addition to members across disciplines within the US liver transplantation community. A modified Delphi approach was employed as the consensus methodology. RESULTS The predominant theme permeating discussion and polling results centered on culture; the beliefs and behaviors of a group of people perpetuated over time. CONCLUSIONS Creating a culture of support for LDLT in the US is key for expansion and includes engagement and education of stakeholders across the spectrum of the process of LDLT. A shift from awareness of LDLT to acknowledgement of benefit of LDLT is the primary goal. Propagation of the maxim "LDLT is the best option" is pivotal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AnnMarie Liapakis
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale New Haven Transplant Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michelle T Jesse
- Transplant Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Mary Amanda Dew
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sukru Emre
- Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Heather Hunt
- Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Living Donor Committee, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology/Transplant, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jayme Locke
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology/Transplant, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Saeed Mohammad
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kim Olthoff
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
High-resolution MR imaging with gadoxetate disodium for the comprehensive evaluation of potential living liver donors. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:497-507. [PMID: 36738083 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several major transplantation centers have used composite multimodality evaluation for the preoperative evaluation of potential living liver donors. This approach can be time-consuming and, although rare, can cause complications. We aimed to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of our comprehensive preoperative MR protocol for the preoperative assessment of living liver donor candidates instead of composite multimodality evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-five consecutive living liver donor candidates underwent multiphasic liver CT and comprehensive donor protocol MR examinations for preoperative evaluation in a single large-volume liver transplantation (LT) center. Three blinded abdominal radiologists reviewed the CT and MR images for vascular and biliary variations. The strength of agreement between CT and MR angiography was assessed using the kappa index. The detection rate of biliary anatomical variations was calculated. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant steatosis (>5%) were calculated. The estimated total volume and right lobe volumes measured by MR volumetry were compared with the corresponding CT volumetry measurements using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS Among the 35 patients, 26 underwent LT. The measurement of agreement showed a moderate to substantial agreement between CT and MR angiography interpretations (kappa values, 0.47-0.79; p < 0.001). Combining T2-weighted and T1-weighted MR cholangiography techniques detected all biliary anatomical variations in 9 of the 26 patients. MR-proton density fat fraction showed a sensitivity of 100% (3/3) and a specificity of 91.3% (21/23) for detecting pathologically determined steatosis (>5%). MR volumetry reached an excellent agreement with CT volumetry (reviewers 1 and 2: ICC, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96). CONCLUSION Our one-stop comprehensive liver donor MR imaging protocol can provide complete information regarding hepatic vascular and biliary anatomies, hepatic parenchymal quality, and liver volume for living liver donor candidates and can replace composite multimodality evaluation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jackson WE, Kaplan A, Saben JL, Kriss MS, Cisek J, Samstein B, Liapakis A, Pillai AA, Brown RS, Pomfret EA. Practice patterns of the medical evaluation of living liver donors in the United States. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:164-171. [PMID: 37160068 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can help address the growing organ shortage in the United States, yet little is known about the current practice patterns in the medical evaluation of living liver donors. We conducted a 131-question survey of all 53 active LDLT transplant programs in the United States to assess current LDLT practices. The response rate was 100%. Donor acceptance rate was 0.33 with an interquartile range of 0.33-0.54 across all centers. Areas of high intercenter agreement included minimum age cutoff of 18 years (73.6%) and the exclusion of those with greater than Class 1 obesity (body mass index, 30.0-34.9 m/kg 2 ) (88.4%). Diabetes mellitus was not an absolute exclusion at most centers (61.5%). Selective liver biopsies were performed for steatosis or iron overload on imaging (67.9% and 62.3%, respectively) or for elevated liver enzymes (60.4%). Steatohepatitis is considered an exclusion at most centers (84.9%). The most common hypercoagulable tests performed were factor V Leiden (FVL) (88.5%), protein C (73.1%), protein S (71.2%), antithrombin III (71.2%) and prothrombin gene mutation (65.4%). At 41.5% of centers, donors were allowed to proceed with donation with FVL heterozygote status. Most programs discontinue oral contraceptive pills at least 28 days prior to surgery. At most centers, the need for cardiovascular ischemic risk testing is based on age (73.6%) and the presence of one or more cardiac risk factors (68.0%). Defining areas of practice consensus and variation underscores the need for data generation to develop evidence-based guidance for the evaluation and risk assessment of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.,Colorado Center for Transplantation Care , Research and Education , Aurora , Colorado , USA
| | - Alyson Kaplan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Weill Cornell Medicine , New York , New York , USA
| | - Jessica L Saben
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care , Research and Education , Aurora , Colorado , USA.,Department of Surgery , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA
| | - Michael S Kriss
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.,Colorado Center for Transplantation Care , Research and Education , Aurora , Colorado , USA
| | - Jaime Cisek
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care , Research and Education , Aurora , Colorado , USA.,Department of Surgery , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA
| | - Benjamin Samstein
- Department of Surgery , Weill Cornell Medicine , New York , New York , USA
| | - AnnMarie Liapakis
- Yale University Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Yale New Haven Transplantation Center , New Haven , Connecticut , USA
| | - Anjana A Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of Chicago Medicine , Chicago , Illinois , USA
| | - Robert S Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Weill Cornell Medicine , New York , New York , USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care , Research and Education , Aurora , Colorado , USA.,Department of Surgery , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ivanics T, Wallace D, Claasen MPAW, Patel MS, Brahmbhatt R, Shwaartz C, Prachalias A, Srinivasan P, Jassem W, Heaton N, Cattral MS, Selzner N, Ghanekar A, Morgenshtern G, Mehta N, Massie AB, van der Meulen J, Segev DL, Sapisochin G. Low utilization of adult-to-adult LDLT in Western countries despite excellent outcomes: International multicenter analysis of the US, the UK, and Canada. J Hepatol 2022; 77:1607-1618. [PMID: 36170900 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers an opportunity to decrease the liver transplant waitlist and reduce waitlist mortality. We sought to compare donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes after LDLT in the US, the UK, and Canada. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter cohort-study of adults (≥18-years) who underwent primary LDLT between Jan-2008 and Dec-2018 from three national liver transplantation registries: United Network for Organ Sharing (US), National Health Service Blood and Transplantation (UK), and the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry (Canada). Patients undergoing retransplantation or multi-organ transplantation were excluded. Post-transplant survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable adjustments were performed using Cox proportional-hazards models with mixed-effect modeling. RESULTS A total of 2,954 living donor liver transplants were performed (US: n = 2,328; Canada: n = 529; UK: n = 97). Canada has maintained the highest proportion of LDLT utilization over time (proportion of LDLT in 2008 - US: 3.3%; Canada: 19.5%; UK: 1.7%; p <0.001 - in 2018 - US: 5.0%; Canada: 13.6%; UK: 0.4%; p <0.001). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 92.6%, 82.8%, and 70.0% in the US vs. 96.1%, 89.9%, and 82.2% in Canada vs. 91.4%, 85.4%, and 66.7% in the UK. After adjustment for characteristics of donors, recipients, transplant year, and treating transplant center as a random effect, all countries had a non-statistically significantly different mortality hazard post-LDLT (Ref US: Canada hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.01, p = 0.05; UK hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.59-2.02, p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS The use of LDLT has remained low in the US, the UK and Canada. Despite this, long-term survival is excellent. Continued efforts to increase LDLT utilization in these countries may be warranted due to the growing waitlist and differences in allocation that may disadvantage patients currently awaiting liver transplantation. LAY SUMMARY This multicenter international comparative analysis of living donor liver transplantation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada demonstrates that despite low use of the procedure, the long-term outcomes are excellent. In addition, the mortality risk is not statistically significantly different between the evaluated countries. However, the incidence and risk of retransplantation differs between the countries, being the highest in the United Kingdom and lowest in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Deparment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Rushin Brahmbhatt
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Parthi Srinivasan
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Wayel Jassem
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Mark S Cattral
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabriela Morgenshtern
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Deparment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Deparment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liver Paired Exchange: Programmatic Hopes and Fears. Transplantation 2022; 107:849-854. [PMID: 36445920 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The dearth of deceased liver donors has created a supply demand gap, necessitating creation of living donor liver transplantation. However, living donor liver transplantation has relied on directed donation, whereby many potential directed donors are rejected based on ABO blood group incompatibility, hepatic size incompatibility, or the need for biliary or arterial reconstruction during transplant surgery. Much like kidney paired exchange, liver paired exchange (LPE) circumvents these incompatibility issues by relying on anonymous, nondirected, or bridge donors that are better anatomical or histological matches for recipients. Although Asia has taken the lead in LPE, the process has only recently been adopted in North America, with the first successful surgery done in the United States in 2019. Our review article sheds light on the process of LPE and the success of LPE in the United States thus far and, additionally, highlights the several logistical and ethical challenges that must be considered as transplant centers adopt and scale up LPE across the United States to address the increased demand for liver allografts.
Collapse
|
17
|
Alqahtani SA, Gurakar A, Tamim H, Schiano TD, Bonder A, Fricker Z, Kazimi M, Eckhoff DE, Curry MP, Saberi B. Regional and National Trends of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States Over the Last Two Decades. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2022; 10:814-824. [PMID: 36304492 PMCID: PMC9547266 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2021.00538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Liver organ shortage remains a major health burden in the US, with more patients being waitlisted than the number of liver transplants (LTs) performed. This study investigated US national and regional trends in living donor LT (LDLT) and identified factors associated with recipient survival. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed LDLT recipients and donors from the United Network Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplant Network database from 1998 until 2019 for clinical characteristics, demographic differences, and survival rate. National and regional trends in LDLT, recipient outcomes, and predictors of survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 223,571 candidates listed for an LT, 57.5% received an organ, of which only 4.2% were LDLTs. Annual adult LDLTs first peaked at 412 in 2001 but experienced a significant decline to 168 by 2009. LDLTs then gradually increased to 445 in 2019. Region 2 had the highest LDLT numbers (n=919), while region 1 had the highest proportion (11.1%). Overall, post-LT mortality was 21.4% among LDLT recipients. Post-LDLT survival rates after 1-, 5-, and 10-years were 92%, 87%, and 70%, respectively. Interval analysis (2004-2019) showed that patients undergoing LDLT in recent years had lower mortality than in earlier years (hazard ratio=0.81, 95% confidence interval=0.75-0.88). CONCLUSIONS Following a substantial decline after a peak in 2001, the number of adult LDLTs steadily increased from 2011 to 2019. However, LDLTs still constitute the minority of the transplant pool in the US. Life-saving policies to increase the use of LDLTs, particularly in regions of high organ demand, should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh A. Alqahtani
- Johns Hopkins University, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Johns Hopkins University, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hani Tamim
- American University of Beirut, Department of Internal Medicine, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Thomas D. Schiano
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Division of Liver Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alan Bonder
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zachary Fricker
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marwan Kazimi
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Devin E. Eckhoff
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael P. Curry
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Behnam Saberi
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Correspondence to: Behnam Saberi, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Harvard Medical School, 375 Longwood Ave, Room 425, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-5827. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patel MS, Egawa H, Kwon YK, Chok KSH, Spiro M, Raptis DA, Vij V, Chaudhary A, Genyk Y. The role of graft to recipient weight ratio on enhanced recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14630. [PMID: 35258108 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There continues to be debate about the lower limit of graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for living donor liver transplant (LDLT). OBJECTIVES To identify the lower limit of GRWR compatible with enhanced recovery after living donor liver transplant and to provide international expert panel recommendations. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Studies assessing how GRWR affects recipient outcomes such as small for size syndrome, other complications, patient and graft survival, and length of stay were included. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION CRD42021260794. RESULTS Twenty articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, and all were retrospective observational studies. There was heterogeneity in the definition of study cohorts and key outcome measures such as small-for-size syndrome. Most studies lacked risk adjustment given limited single-center sample size. GRWR of ≥ .8% is associated with enhanced recovery. Recipients of grafts with GRWR < .8%, however, were found to have similar outcomes as those with ≥ .8% when appropriate consideration is made for portal flow modulation and recipient illness severity. CONCLUSIONS GRWR ≥ .8% is often compatible with enhanced recovery, but grafts < .8% can be used in selected LDLT recipients with optimal donor-recipient selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yong Kyong Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angles, California, USA
| | - Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
- Department of Surgery and State Key Laboratory for Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Vivek Vij
- Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fortis Hospital, Noida, UP, India
| | - Abhideep Chaudhary
- Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplant, BL Kapur Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jo HS, Yu YD, Choi YJ, Kim DS. Left liver graft in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation with an optimal portal flow modulation strategy to overcome the small-for-size syndrome – A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2022; 106:106953. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
20
|
Ullah K, Dogar AW, Rehman IU, Abbas SH, Ullah I, Nisar H, Lee KY. Expanding the living liver donor pool in countries having limited deceased donor activity: Pakistani perspective. Transpl Immunol 2022; 75:101683. [PMID: 35952941 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Over the last decades, liver transplantation (LT) has evolved into a life-saving procedure. Due to limited deceased donor activities in the eastern world, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) had flourished tremendously in most Asian countries. Yet, these LDLT activities fall short of meeting the expected demands. Pakistan, a developing country, bears a major burden of liver diseases. Currently, only few centers offer LDLT services in the country. On the other hand, deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) activities have not started due to social, cultural, and religious beliefs. Various strategies can be adopted successfully to overcome the scarcity of live liver donors (LLDs) and to expand the donor pool, keeping in view donor safety and recipient outcome. These include consideration of LLDs with underlying clinical conditions like G6PD deficiency and Hepatitis B core positivity. Extended donor criteria can also be utilized and relaxation can be made in various donors' parameters including upper age and body mass index after approval from the multidisciplinary board. Also, left lobe grafts, grafts with various anatomical variations, and a low graft-to-recipient ratio can be considered in appropriate situations. ABO-incompatible LT and donor swapping at times may help in expanding the LLDs pool. Similarly, legislation is needed to allow live non-blood-related donors for organ donations. Finally, community education and awareness through various social media flat forms are needed to promote deceased organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleem Ullah
- Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Wahab Dogar
- Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat, Sindh, Pakistan
| | | | - Syed Hasnain Abbas
- Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ullah
- Kabir Medical College, Gandhara University, Peshawar, Pakistan; Institute of Public Health and Social Science (IPH&SS), Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Husna Nisar
- Mehboob School of Physiotherapy, Hayatabad, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Ka Yiu Lee
- Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lim J, Han S, Lee D, Shim JH, Kim K, Lim Y, Lee HC, Jung D, Lee S, Kim K, Choi J. Identification of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors by machine learning models. Hepatol Commun 2022; 6:1689-1698. [PMID: 35377548 PMCID: PMC9234640 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Selecting an optimal donor for living donor liver transplantation is crucial for the safety of both the donor and recipient, and hepatic steatosis is an important consideration. We aimed to build a prediction model with noninvasive variables to evaluate macrovesicular steatosis in potential donors by using various prediction models. The study population comprised potential living donors who had undergone donation workup, including percutaneous liver biopsy, in the Republic of Korea between 2016 and 2019. Meaningful macrovesicular hepatic steatosis was defined as >5%. Whole data were divided into training (70.5%) and test (29.5%) data sets based on the date of liver biopsy. Random forest, support vector machine, regularized discriminant analysis, mixture discriminant analysis, flexible discriminant analysis, and deep neural network machine learning methods as well as traditional logistic regression were employed. The mean patient age was 31.4 years, and 66.3% of the patients were men. Of the 1652 patients, 518 (31.4%) had >5% macrovesicular steatosis on the liver biopsy specimen. The logistic model had the best prediction power and prediction performances with an accuracy of 80.0% and 80.9% in the training and test data sets, respectively. A cut-off value of 31.1% for the predicted risk of hepatic steatosis was selected with a sensitivity of 77.7% and specificity of 81.0%. We have provided our model on the website (https://hanseungbong.shinyapps.io/shiny_app_up/) under the name DONATION Model. Our algorithm to predict macrovesicular steatosis using routine parameters is beneficial for identifying optimal potential living donors by avoiding superfluous liver biopsy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Lim
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Seungbong Han
- Department of BiostatisticsKorea University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Danbi Lee
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kang Mo Kim
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Young‐Suk Lim
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Han Chu Lee
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Dong Hwan Jung
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Sung‐Gyu Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Ki‐Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Jonggi Choi
- Department of GastroenterologyAsan Liver CenterAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kaplan A, Rosenblatt R, Jackson W, Samstein B, Brown RS. Practices and Perceptions of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nondirected Donation, and Liver Paired Exchange: A National Survey. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:774-781. [PMID: 34862704 PMCID: PMC9018478 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains underutilized in the United States. Barriers to LDLT and acceptance of nondirected living liver donation (ND-LLD) and liver paired exchange (LPE) are unclear. The medical and surgical directors of 99 unique transplantation programs (56 LDLT programs and 43 non-LDLT programs) were surveyed to gain insight into perceptions and practices of LDLT and types of donors utilized. The response rate was 84%. Most LDLT programs (65%) reported performing ND-LLD, though opinions regarding allocation and the need for additional evaluation of these donors were mixed. Only a minority of LDLT programs reported performing LPE (12%), but most programs (78%) would be open to cross-institutional LPE barring logistical barriers. There were significant differences between LDLT and non-LDLT programs with regard to perceived barriers to LDLT, with LDLT programs reporting mainly donor and recipient factors and non-LDLT programs reporting institutional factors (P < 0.001). Understanding perceptions and practices of LDLT, ND-LLD, and LPE is important to aid in the growth of LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson Kaplan
- Weill Cornell Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, United States
| | | | - Whitney Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Denver School of Medicine, United States
| | - Benjamin Samstein
- Dept of Medicine, Clinical Chief, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Center for Liver Disease, Weill Cornell Medicine, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dinh NH, Beaupha SMC. Safety, clinical and laboratory characteristics of donors with thalassemia minor in living donor kidney transplant: a case series. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:397. [PMID: 34852778 PMCID: PMC8638172 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to the increasing demand for kidney transplants, sometimes donors with underlying medical conditions can be considered for living kidney donor transplant. Thalassemia is amongst the most common inherited disorders of hemoglobin globally, which is not restricted as an exclusion criterion. However, there is currently no study examine the safety and characteristics of kidney donors with thalassemia minor. Methods All eligible live kidney donors between 2016 and 2019 with thalassemia minor at a tertiary hospital were recruited. Baseline characteristics, clinical and laboratory outcomes were investigated. Results Fifteen donors (11 women, 55.5 ± 15.0 year-old) were included with a follow-up duration of 2 (1-4) years since operation. The most prevalent gene mutation among participants was DEL-SEA. No clinical manifestations of anemia were seen but 10 participants had mild anemia diagnosed from blood tests. Cardiovascular, liver and renal function were normal before nephrectomy. Until now, all donors are alive and maintain overall good health. Anemia condition is not affected, and the post-donation eGFR = 71.04 ± 11.54 mL/min/1.73m2 is comparable to outcomes of healthy donors reported in previous studies. Two donors are at risk of proteinuria at 1-year post-transplant with A/C ratio > 30 mg/g. Conclusions Thalassemia minor individuals who are non-transfusion-dependent, without anemia clinical manifestations and have no contraindications to kidney donation are safe to be donors in short-term. An eGFR of at least 80 mL/min/1.73m2 should be considered to avoid low post-donation eGFR, and awareness should be raised on thalassemia donors with even mild albuminuria. Nephrectomy does not worsen thalassemia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02609-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhan Hieu Dinh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. .,Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Outcomes of Highly Selected Live Donors With a Future Liver Remnant Less Than or Equal to 30%: A Matched Cohort Study. Transplantation 2021; 105:2397-2403. [PMID: 33239541 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main concern with live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the risk to the donor. Given the potential risk of liver insufficiency, most centers will only accept candidates with future liver remnants (FLR) >30%. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of donors who underwent LDLT with FLR ≤30% and >30%. METHODS Adults who underwent right hepatectomy for LDLT between 2000 and 2018 were analyzed. Remnant liver volumes were estimated using hepatic volumetry. To adjust for between-group differences, donors with FLR ≤30% and >30% were matched 1:2 based on baseline characteristics. Postoperative complications including liver dysfunction were compared between the groups. RESULTS A total of 604 live donors were identified, 28 (4.6%) of whom had a FLR ≤30%. Twenty-eight cases were successfully matched with 56 controls; the matched cohorts were mostly similar in terms of donor and graft characteristics. The calculated median FLR was 29.8 (range, 28.0-30.0) and 35.2 (range, 30.1-68.1) in each respective group. Median follow-up was 36.5 mo (interquartile range, 11.8-66.1). Postoperative outcomes were similar between groups. No difference was observed in overall complication rates (FLR ≤30%: 32.1% versus FLR >30%: 28.6%; odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-3.27) or major complication rates (FLR ≤30%: 14.3% versus FLR >30%: 14.3%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.33-4.10). Posthepatectomy liver failure was rare, and no difference was observed (FLR ≤30%: 3.6% versus FLR >30%: 3.6%; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.11-11.1). CONCLUSION A calculated FLR between 28% and 30% on its own should not represent a formal contraindication for live donation.
Collapse
|
25
|
Borhani AA, Elsayes KM, Catania R, Kambadakone A, Furlan A, Kierans AS, Kamath A, Harmath C, Horvat N, Humar A, Kielar AZ. Imaging Evaluation of Living Liver Donor Candidates: Techniques, Protocols, and Anatomy. Radiographics 2021; 41:1572-1591. [PMID: 34597229 PMCID: PMC9478886 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The need for liver transplants is increasing because the prevalence of liver diseases and the indications for transplants are growing. In response to the shortage of grafts from deceased donors, more transplants are being performed worldwide with grafts from living donors. Radiologic evaluation is an integral component in the assessment of donor candidates to ensure their eligibility and to choose the most appropriate surgical approach. MRI is the preferred modality for evaluation of the liver parenchyma and biliary tree. In most centers, a combination of MRI and CT is used to take advantage of the higher spatial resolution of CT for evaluation of arteries. However, MRI-only assessment is feasible. In addition to assessment of the liver parenchyma for abnormalities such as steatosis, a detailed evaluation of the hepatic vascular and biliary system for pertinent anatomic variants is crucial, because these variants can affect surgical techniques and outcomes in both recipients and donors. In this pictorial article, after a brief review of the most common surgical techniques and postsurgical liver anatomy, the biliary and vascular anatomy are discussed, with specific attention paid to the variants that are pertinent to this surgical procedure. The roles of liver segmentation and volumetric assessment and current imaging techniques and protocols are also discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir A. Borhani
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Khaled M. Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Roberta Catania
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Alessandro Furlan
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Andrea S. Kierans
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Amita Kamath
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Carla Harmath
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Natally Horvat
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Abhinav Humar
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| | - Ania Z. Kielar
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg
School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair St, Arkes Family Pavilion, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60611 (A.A.B., R.C.); Departments of Radiology (A.A.B., A.F.) and
Surgery (A.H.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa;
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A. Kambadakone); Department of
Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A. Kamath);
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
(C.H.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY, and Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo,
São Paulo, Brazil (N.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fang W, Noda M, Gotoh K, Morooka Y, Noda T, Kobayashi S, Doki Y, Eguchi H, Umeshita K. Fatty liver disease in Living Liver Donors: A Single-Institute Experience of 220 Donors. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2238-2246. [PMID: 34355425 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We retrospectively reviewed 220 living liver donors, with a focus on the development of postoperative fatty liver. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, imaging tests, operations, and biopsies were obtained from medical records. We used unenhanced CT and USG to diagnose fatty liver. Donor candidates with fatty liver underwent weight loss intervention until imaging tests no longer demonstrated any features of fatty liver. Among 220 donors, 61 were diagnosed with preoperative fatty liver. The mean BMI of these 61 donors significantly decreased from 24.9 at the first visit to 23.6 kg/m2 immediately before surgery (p=0.0386). A multivariate analysis revealed the following significant risk factors for postoperative fatty liver: male sex (p=0.0033), BMI immediately before surgery (p=0.0028), and a history of treatment for preoperative fatty liver (p=0.0231). Postoperative fatty liver was often refractory to weight loss intervention. No improvement was observed in 14 of the 32 donors who had been diagnosed with fatty liver postoperatively, and 1 of the 14 donors even developed NASH. In conclusion, special attention should be paid to prevent fatty liver after surgery in male donors who show a high BMI immediately before surgery and with a history of treatment for preoperative fatty liver, and lifelong follow-up is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Fang
- Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Momoko Noda
- Department of Nursing, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kunihito Gotoh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuki Morooka
- School of Nursing, Mukogawa Women's University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Umeshita
- Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reducing the Safety Limit for Remnant Liver Volume in Living Donor Hepatectomy-Are We Pushing the Envelope Off the Edge? Transplantation 2021; 105:e61. [PMID: 34048419 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
28
|
Emamaullee J, Conrad C, Kim M, Goldbeck C, Kwon Y, Singh P, Niemann CU, Sher L, Genyk Y. Assessment of the global practice of living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1914-1927. [PMID: 34165829 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Criteria that drive the selection and utilization of living liver donors are limited. Herein, the global availability of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and components of donor selection and utilization were assessed via an international survey. There were 124 respondents representing 41 countries, including 47 from Asia/Middle East (A/ME), 20 from Europe, and 57 from the Americas. Responses were obtained from 94.9% of countries with ≥10 LDLT cases/year. Most centers (82.3%) have defined donor age criteria (median 18-60 years), while preset recipient MELD cutoffs (median 18-30) were only reported in 54.8% of programs. Overall, 67.5% of programs have preset donor BMI (body mass index) ranges (median 18-30), and the mean acceptable macrosteatosis was highest for A/ME (20.2 ± 9.2%) and lowest for Americas (16.5 ± 8.4%, P = 0.04). Americas (56.1%) and European (60.0%) programs were more likely to consider anonymous donors versus A/ME programs (27.7%, P = 0.01). There were no differences in consideration of complex anatomical variations. Most programs (75.9%) perform donor surgery via an open approach, and A/ME programs are more likely to use microscopic arterial reconstruction. Despite variations in practice, key aspects of living donor selection were identified. These findings provide a contemporary reference point as LDLT continues to expand into areas with limited access to liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Emamaullee
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Claire Conrad
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michelle Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Cameron Goldbeck
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yong Kwon
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pranay Singh
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Claus U Niemann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Linda Sher
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Toshima T, Yoshizumi T, Shimagaki T, Wang H, Kurihara T, Nagao Y, Itoh S, Harada N, Mori M. Which is better to use "body weight" or "standard liver weight", for predicting small-for-size graft syndrome after living donor liver transplantation? Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:363-372. [PMID: 34095727 PMCID: PMC8164458 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Little evidence about whether to apply graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) or graft weight to standard liver weight (GW/SLW) for graft selection has been published. The aim of the present study was to clarify the importance of the correct use of GRWR and GW/SLW for selecting graft according to the recipients' physique in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS Data were collected for 694 recipients who underwent LDLT between 1997 and 2020. RESULTS One of the marginal grafts meeting GW/SLW ≥ 35% but GRWR < 0.7% has been used in more recipients with men and higher body mass index (BMI), and the other meeting GRWR ≥ 0.7% but GW/SLW < 35% has been used in more recipients with women with lower BMI. In the cohort of BMI > 30 kg/m2, the recipients with GRWR < 0.7% had a significantly higher incidence of small-for-size graft syndrome (SFSS) compared to those with GRWR ≥ 0.7% (P = 0.008, 46.2% vs 5.9%), and using the cutoff of GW/SLW < 35% could not differentiate. In contrast, in the cohort of BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, the recipients with GW/SLW < 35% also had a significantly higher incidence of SFSS (P = 0.013, 16.9% vs 9.4%). Multivariate analysis showed that GRWR < 0.7% [odds ratio (OR) 14.145, P = 0.048] was the independent risk factor for SFSS in obese recipients, and GW/SLW < 35% [OR 2.685, P = 0.002] was the independent risk factor in non-obese recipients. CONCLUSION Proper use of the formulas for calculating GRWR and GW/SLW in choosing graft according to recipient BMI is important, not only to meet metabolic demand for avoiding SFSS but also to ameliorate donor shortages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeo Toshima
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Tomonari Shimagaki
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Huanlin Wang
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Takeshi Kurihara
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Nagao
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Shinji Itoh
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Noboru Harada
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Masaki Mori
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yoon YI, Song GW, Lee SG, Park GC, Hwang S, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Jung DH, Kim KW, Shim JH, Tak EY, Kirchner VA, Pruett TL. Safe use of right lobe living donor livers with moderate steatosis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2021; 34:872-881. [PMID: 33660330 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic steatosis (HS) beyond a certain degree can jeopardize living donor (LD) safety, particularly in right lobe (RL) donors, making it a major obstacle for donor pool expansion in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). From July 2004 to June 2016, 58 LDs donated their RLs despite having moderate HS (30%-50% steatosis) determined by intraoperative biopsy at a single center. We performed greedy matching to compare the outcomes of the donors and recipients of this group with those of LDs with no HS. The mean left lobe (LL) HS value in the 58 cases was 20.9 ± 12.4%, which was significantly lower than the mean RL HS value (38.8 ± 6.7%, P < 0.001). The mean ratio of the remnant LL to the total liver volume was 37.8 ± 2.2. No differences were observed in the postoperative liver function and donor and recipient morbidity and mortality rates. The liver regeneration rates in recipients and donors at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively did not differ significantly. The patient and graft survival rates of the recipients showed no differences. The use of well-selected RL grafts with moderate steatosis does not impair graft function, recipient outcomes, or donor safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi-Won Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Gyu Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gil-Chun Park
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deok-Bog Moon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Yong Ha
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hwan Jung
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju-Hyun Shim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Young Tak
- Asan Institute for Life Sciences and Asan-Minnesota Institute for Innovating Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Varvara A Kirchner
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, and Asan-Minnesota Institute for Innovating Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy L Pruett
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, and Asan-Minnesota Institute for Innovating Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Moghe A, Ganesh S, Humar A, Molinari M, Jonassaint N. Expanding Donor Selection and Recipient Indications for Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Clin Liver Dis 2021; 25:121-135. [PMID: 33978574 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
There is an acute shortage of deceased donor organs for liver transplantation in the United States. Nearly a third of patients either die or become too sick for transplant while on the transplant waitlist. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) bridges the gap between demand and supply of organs for liver transplantation. This article reviews current living donor selection criteria, and avenues for expansion of criteria with novel surgical techniques and ongoing outcomes research. Ways in which institutions can establish and expand LDLT programs using the Living Donor Champion model are discussed. Efforts to expand recipient indications for LDLT are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshata Moghe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Mezzanine Level, C-Wing, PUH 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. https://twitter.com/AkshataMoghe
| | - Swaytha Ganesh
- Living Donor Liver Transplantation Program, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Center for Liver Diseases, 3471 Fifth Avenue, 900 Kaufmann Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Montefiore, Seventh Floor - N723, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Montefiore, N761, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Naudia Jonassaint
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Center for Liver Diseases, 3471 Fifth Avenue, 900 Kaufmann Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Akbulut S, Sahin TT, Yilmaz S. Comment on "A Worldwide Survey of Live Liver Donor Selection Policies at 24 Centers With a Combined Experience of 19 009 Adult Living Donor Liver Transplants". Transplantation 2021; 105:e18. [PMID: 33492112 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Akbulut
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Reply to Comment: A Worldwide Survey of Live Liver Donor Selection Policies at 24 Centers With a Combined Experience of 19 009 Adult Living Donor Liver Transplants. Transplantation 2021; 105:e19. [PMID: 33492113 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
Yagi S, Singhal A, Jung DH, Hashimoto K. Living-donor liver transplantation: Right versus left. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:128-133. [PMID: 32619620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
A dilemma of graft selection between right or left livers occurs during the planning of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as well as splitting a whole liver graft into full right/full left grafts in deceased-donor liver transplantation. The right liver's relation to the whole liver could be considered as the trunk of a tree; it has a larger volume, the main axis of bile ducts, and the inferior vena cava mainly belongs to the right liver. Therefore, it was considered as the standard graft in LDLTs. Whether to procure the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with a right liver graft or to leave it attached to the left-liver remnant largely depends on the transplant institute. Recently, most transplant institutes tend to leave the MHV with the left liver for the sake of donor safety. Unlike hepatectomy for liver tumors, it is vital to preserve inflow and outflow for both the resected as well as the remaining livers. While procuring any graft type, the most important is to procure a liver graft with reconstructable portal veins, hepatic arteries, hepatic veins, and bile ducts, which should be well preoperatively planned using 3D-computed tomography with considerations given to graft volume and potential congestion areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Yagi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreas and Transplant Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Ashish Singhal
- Advanced Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, Fortis Hospitals, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Dong-Hwan Jung
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of liver transplantation (LT) is increasingly being limited by the unavailability of liver grafts. Unique regenerative capacity of liver in response to injuries makes living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) a feasible strategy to meet clinical demands. Serine hydroxymethyl-transferase 2 (SHMT2) serves as the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of glycine. Glycine affects the activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which is important for cellular growth and proliferation. In this study, the effects of SHMT2 on mouse liver regeneration were investigated using a classical partial hepatectomy (PH) model. METHODS In vivo, PH was performed on mice with or without knockdown of SHMT2. In vitro, SHMT2 was overexpressed in primary hepatocytes, which were cultured in customized Dulbecco's modified eagle media and LY294002 (an Akt inhibitor). Relevant indexes of liver regeneration, cell proliferation, and Akt/mTOR signal pathways were analyzed. RESULTS After PH, the expression levels of SHMT2 fluctuated with time and knockdown of SHMT2 in vivo lowered the regenerative ability of liver, with reduced glycine levels compared to the scramble group. In addition, overexpression of SHMT2 in hepatocytes boosted glycine production while enhancing Akt/mTOR pathway activity. These results were validated by the application of LY294002 in vitro. CONCLUSIONS SHMT2 can contribute to liver regeneration after PH, and this is likely related to the activation of Akt/mTOR signaling pathway by its metabolic product, glycine, in hepatocytes. These results might have therapeutic implications for the prognosis of patients undergoing hepatic resection or transplantation.
Collapse
|
36
|
Adalı G, Bozkurt B, Ceyhan Ö, Server S, Doğusoy GB, Yüzer Y, Tokat Y. Body Mass Index and Unenhanced CT as a Predictor of Hepatic Steatosis in Potential Liver Donors. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:2373-2378. [PMID: 31402250 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In living-donor liver transplantation, donor hepatic steatosis is crucial for both the donor and the recipient. Body mass index (BMI) and the unenhanced computed tomography liver attenuation index (CT LAI) are noninvasive methods to predict hepatic steatosis in living-donor liver candidates. AIM To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of CT LAI in conjunction with different BMI values for macrovesicular steatosis in living-donor liver candidates. METHODS A total of 264 potential liver donors were included. The diagnostic accuracy of 2 CT LAI cut-offs and 3 BMI cut-off values for the assessment of hepatic steatosis ≥15% and ≤5% was determined. RESULTS Using CT LAI, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.89-0.99) for hepatic steatosis ≥15% in donors with BMI <25 kg/m2. For detecting hepatic steatosis ≥15%, a CT LAI ≤0 had specificities of 100%, 76.2%, and 55.6% and positive predictive values of 100%, 95.5%, and 93.5% for patients with BMI values <25 kg/m2, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, and ≥30 kg/m2, respectively. According to logistic regression analyses, only CT LAI ≤0 was found to be independently associated with hepatic steatosis ≥15%. CONCLUSIONS In donors with BMI <30 kg/m2 and a CT LAI value >6, liver biopsy might be avoided. Biopsy may be reserved solely for donors with CT LAI value >0 and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 as the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography for predicting hepatic steatosis decreases with increasing BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gupse Adalı
- Department of Gastroenterology, Istanbul Bilim University, Florence Nightingale Hospital Liver Unit, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Birkan Bozkurt
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University, Florence Nightingale Hospital Liver Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Özgür Ceyhan
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sadık Server
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Yıldıray Yüzer
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University, Florence Nightingale Hospital Liver Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yaman Tokat
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University, Florence Nightingale Hospital Liver Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Overview, Imaging Technique, and Diagnostic Considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:54-64. [PMID: 30973783 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.21034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to discuss the process of becoming a liver donor, describe the surgical methods used for transplantation, and critically review preoperative and intraoperative imaging techniques. CONCLUSION. Radiologists play a vital role in ensuring the safety of living liver donors; however, consensus guidelines do not exist for imaging protocol or reporting. Standardization would provide more consistent image quality across centers, improve communication with the transplant team, and facilitate data mining for quality assurance and research.
Collapse
|