1
|
Huang CH, Chen WY, Chen RF, Ramachandran S, Liu KF, Kuo YR. Cell therapies and its derivatives as immunomodulators in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Asian J Surg 2024:S1015-9584(24)00756-5. [PMID: 38704267 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.04.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The adverse effects of traditional pharmaceutical immunosuppressive regimens have been a major obstacle to successful allograft survival in vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation (VCA) cases. Consequently, there is a pressing need to explore alternative approaches to reduce reliance on conventional immunotherapy. Cell therapy, encompassing immune-cell-based and stem-cell-based regimens, has emerged as a promising avenue of research. Immune cells can be categorized into two main systems: innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity comprises tolerogenic dendritic cells, regulatory macrophages, and invariant natural killer T cells, while adaptive immunity includes T regulatory cells and B regulatory cells. Investigations are currently underway to assess the potential of these immune cell populations in inducing immune tolerance. Furthermore, mixed chimerism therapy, involving the transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), shows promise in promoting allograft tolerance. Additionally, extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from MSCs offer a novel avenue for extending allograft survival. This review provides a comprehensive summary of cutting-edge research on immune cell therapies, mixed chimerism therapies, and MSCs-derived EVs in the context of VCAs. Findings from preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate the tremendous potential of these alternative therapies in optimizing allograft survival in VCAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Hsin Huang
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Wei Yu Chen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Rong-Fu Chen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Savitha Ramachandran
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Keng-Fan Liu
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Yur-Ren Kuo
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Center, Regenerative Medicine, Cell Therapy Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Academic Clinical Programme for Musculoskeletal Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Altulea D, van den Born JC, Diepstra A, Bungener L, Terpstra D, Hepkema BG, Lammerts R, Heeringa P, Heidt S, Otten H, Reteig L, Karahan GE, Berger SP, Sanders JS. Memory B-cell derived donor-specific antibodies do not predict outcome in sensitized kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective single-center study. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1360627. [PMID: 38646525 PMCID: PMC11026632 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1360627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Repeated exposure to sensitizing events can activate HLA-specific memory B cells, leading to the production of donor-specific memory B cell antibodies (DSAm) that pose a risk for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This single-center retrospective study aimed to identify DSAm and assess their association with outcomes in a cohort of KTRs with pretransplant serum donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Methods We polyclonally activated pretransplant peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 60 KTRs in vitro, isolated and quantified IgG from the culture supernatant using ELISA, and analyzed the HLA antibodies of eluates with single antigen bead (SAB) assays, comparing them to the donor HLA typing for potential DSAm. Biopsies from 41 KTRs were evaluated for rejection based on BANFF 2019 criteria. Results At transplantation, a total of 37 DSAm were detected in 26 of 60 patients (43%), of which 13 (35%) were found to be undetectable in serum. No significant association was found between pretransplant DSAm and ABMR (P=0.53). Similar results were observed in a Kaplan-Meier analysis for ABMR within the first year posttransplant (P=0.29). Additionally, MFI levels of DSAm showed no significant association with ABMR (P=0.28). Conclusion This study suggests no significant association between DSAm and biopsy-proven clinical ABMR. Further prospective research is needed to determine whether assessing DSAm could enhance existing immunological risk assessment methods for monitoring KTRs, particularly in non-sensitized KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dania Altulea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Joost C. van den Born
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Arjan Diepstra
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Laura Bungener
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Terpstra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G. Hepkema
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rosa Lammerts
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Peter Heeringa
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Henny Otten
- Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon Reteig
- Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gonca E. Karahan
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Stefan P. Berger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Weerd AE, Roelen DL, van de Wetering J, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Reinders MEJ. Imlifidase Desensitization in HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Finding the Sweet Spot. Transplantation 2024; 108:335-345. [PMID: 37340532 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase, derived from a Streptococcus pyogenes enzyme, cleaves the entire immunoglobulin G pool within hours after administration in fully cleaved antigen-binding and crystallizable fragments. These cleaved fragments can no longer exert their antibody-dependent cytotoxic functions, thereby creating a window to permit HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation. Imlifidase is labeled, in Europe only, for deceased donor kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients, whose chances for an HLA-compatible transplant are negligible. This review discusses outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies on imlifidase and describes the phase III desensitization trials that are currently enrolling patients. A comparison is made with other desensitization methods. The review discusses the immunological work-up of imlifidase candidates and especially the "delisting strategy" of antigens that shift from unacceptable to acceptable with imlifidase desensitization. Other considerations for clinical implementation, such as adaptation of induction protocols, are also discussed. Imlifidase cleaves most of the currently used induction agents except for horse antithymocyte globulin, and rebound of donor-specific antibodies should be managed. Another consideration is the timing and interpretation of (virtual) crossmatches when bringing this novel desensitization agent into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies E de Weerd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline van de Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Battle R, Pritchard D, Peacock S, Hastie C, Worthington J, Jordan S, McCaughlan JA, Barnardo M, Cope R, Collins C, Diaz-Burlinson N, Rosser C, Foster L, Kallon D, Shaw O, Briggs D, Turner D, Anand A, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Sage D. BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2023; 50 Suppl 2:3-63. [PMID: 37919251 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sarah Peacock
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jordan
- National Blood Service Tooting, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Barnardo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Luke Foster
- Birmingham Blood Donor Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Olivia Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kervella D, Torija A, Zúñiga JM, Bestard O. How to measure human leukocyte antigen-specific B cells. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:345-354. [PMID: 37678170 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The implementation of highly sensitive immune assays measuring anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has modified alloimmune risk stratification and diagnosis of rejection. Nonetheless, anti-HLA antibodies represent the downstream effector mechanism of the B-cell response. Better characterizing the cellular components of the humoral immune response (including memory B cells (mBCs) and long-lived plasma cells) could help to further stratify the alloimmune risk stratification and enable discovery of new therapeutic targets. Several tests that characterize HLA-specific mBCs, either functionally or phenotypically, have been developed in the last years, showing promising applications as well as some limitations. RECENT FINDINGS Functional assays involving ex vivo polyclonal activation of mBC have been refined to allow the detection of HLA-specific mBC capable of producing anti-HLA Abs, using different and complementary detection platforms such as multiplex Fluorospot and single antigen bead assay on culture supernatants. Detection of circulating HLA-specific B cells by flow cytometry remains hindered by the very low frequency of HLA-specific mBC. SUMMARY Technological refinements have allowed the development of tests detecting HLA-specific mBC. Further evaluation of these assays in clinical trials, both for immune risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy (desensitization strategies, rescue therapies for ABMR) are now urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Kervella
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department
- Translational Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Torija
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department
- Translational Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose M Zúñiga
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department
- Translational Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department
- Translational Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Broek DAJ, Meziyerh S, Budde K, Lefaucheur C, Cozzi E, Bertrand D, López del Moral C, Dorling A, Emonds MP, Naesens M, de Vries APJ. The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11321. [PMID: 37560072 PMCID: PMC10408721 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A. J. van den Broek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Soufian Meziyerh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Killian JT, King RG, Kizziah JL, Fucile CF, Diaz-Avalos R, Qiu S, Silva-Sanchez A, Mousseau BJ, Macon KJ, Callahan AR, Yang G, Hossain ME, Akther J, Houp JA, Rosenblum FD, Porrett PM, Ong SC, Kumar V, Mobley JA, Saphire EO, Kearney JF, Randall TD, Rosenberg AF, Green TJ, Lund FE. Alloreactivity and autoreactivity converge to support B cell epitope targeting in transplant rejection. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.03.31.534734. [PMID: 37034637 PMCID: PMC10081326 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.31.534734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Antibody (Ab) responses against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) proteins mismatched between donor and recipient are leading cause of allograft loss in kidney transplantation. However, therapies targeting alloreactive B cell and Ab-secreting cell (ASC) are lacking, motivating the need to understand how to prevent and abrogate these alloresponses. Using molecular, structural, and proteomic techniques, we profiled the B cell response in a kidney transplant recipient with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. We found that this response spanned the rejected organ and peripheral blood, stimulated the differentiation of multiple B cell subsets, and produced a high-affinity, donor-specific, anti-HLA response. We found epitopic immunodominance that relied on highly exposed, solvent-accessible mismatched HLA residues as well as structural and biomolecular evidence of autoreactivity against the recipient's self-HLA allele. These alloreactive and autoreactive signatures converged in the recipient's circulating donor-specific Ab repertoire, suggesting that rejection requires both the recognition of non-self and breaches of tolerance to lead to alloinjury and graft loss.
Collapse
|
8
|
Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review. Transplantation 2023; 107:231-253. [PMID: 35915547 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes. METHODS We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility. RESULTS Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tambur AR, Bestard O, Campbell P, Chong AS, Barrio MC, Ford ML, Gebel HM, Heidt S, Hickey M, Jackson A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Lefaucheur C, Louis K, Mannon RB, Mengel M, Morris A, Pinelli DF, Reed EF, Schinstock C, Taupin JL, Valenzuela N, Wiebe C, Nickerson P. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:133-149. [PMID: 36695615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Martha Crespo Barrio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar & Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mandy L Ford
- Department of Surgery and Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Louis
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David F Pinelli
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology, Saint Louis Hospital and University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strategies to Overcome HLA Sensitization and Improve Access to Retransplantation after Kidney Graft Loss. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195753. [PMID: 36233621 PMCID: PMC9572793 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation have a previously failed graft. Retransplantation provides a significant improvement in morbidity, mortality, and quality of life when compared to dialysis. However, HLA sensitization is a major barrier to kidney retransplantation and the majority of the highly sensitized patients are waiting for a subsequent kidney transplant. A multidisciplinary team that includes immunogeneticists, transplant nephrologists and surgeons, and adequate allocation policies is fundamental to increase access to a kidney retransplant. A review of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was performed on the challenges of kidney retransplantation after graft loss, focusing on the HLA barrier and new strategies to overcome sensitization. Conclusion: Technical advances in immunogenetics, new desensitization protocols, and complex allocation programs have emerged in recent years to provide a new hope to kidney recipients with a previously failed graft.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bou Saba J, Cherukuri A. Antigen-specific B cells in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 2022; 102:233-235. [PMID: 35870812 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
In this issue, Burton et al. describe a convincing method to identify and enumerate human leukocyte antigen-specific B cells and subsets using biotinylated human leukocyte antigen proteins. Importantly, they demonstrate that these antigen-specific B cells are found at a greater frequency in sensitized kidney transplant recipients when compared with healthy volunteers. Finally, using an indirect antigen-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay, they uncover the complexity of B- and T-cell interactions and the influence of regulatory T cells on such interactions in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnny Bou Saba
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aravind Cherukuri
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Renal and Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Burton H, McLaughlin L, Shiu KY, Shaw O, Mamode N, Spencer J, Dorling A. The phenotype of HLA-binding B cells from sensitized kidney transplant recipients correlates with clinically prognostic patterns of interferon-γ production against purified HLA proteins. Kidney Int 2022; 102:355-369. [PMID: 35483526 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
B cells play crucial roles in cell-mediated alloimmune responses. In vitro, B cells can support or regulate indirect T-cell alloreactivity in response to donor antigens on ELISpot and these patterns associate with clinical outcome. Previous reports of associations between B-cell phenotype and function have examined global phenotypes and responses to polyclonal stimuli. We hypothesized that studying antigen-specific B cells, using samples from sensitized patients, would inform further study to identify novel targets for intervention. Using biotinylated HLA proteins, which bind HLA-specific B cells via the B-cell receptor in a dose-dependent fashion, we report the specific phenotype of HLA-binding B cells and define how they associated with patterns of anti-HLA response in interferon-γ ELISpot. HLA-binding class-switched and IgM+CD27+ memory cells associated strongly with B-dependent interferon-γ production and appeared not suppressible by endogenous Tregs. When the predominant HLA-binding phenotype was naïve B cells, the associated functional ELISpot phenotype was determined by other cells present. High numbers of non-HLA-binding transitional cells associated with B-suppressed interferon-γ production, especially if Tregs were present. However, high frequencies of HLA-binding marginal-zone precursors associated with B-dependent interferon-γ production that appeared suppressible by Tregs. Finally, non-HLA-binding marginal zone precursors may also suppress interferon-γ production, though this association only emerged when Tregs were absent from the ELISpot. Thus, our novel data provide a foundation on which to further define the complexities of interactions between HLA-specific T and B cells and identify new targets for intervention in new therapies for chronic rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Burton
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura McLaughlin
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kin Yee Shiu
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Renal Medicine (UCL), Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olivia Shaw
- Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Spencer
- Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alloreactive memory B cell detection by flow cytometric cross match using polyclonally activated memory B cell culture supernatants. Transpl Immunol 2022; 73:101642. [PMID: 35667546 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In addition to alloantibodies, alloreactive memory B cell (mBC) evaluation has a potential for immunological risk assessment during transplantation processes. For the alloreactive mBCs evaluation currently, direct Flow Cytometric (FC) analysis using the HLA tetramer staining is an option. Evaluation of alloantibodies produced by the polyclonally stimulated alloreactive mBCs in in vitro culture system seems to be another useful approach, but this needs further downstream applications. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of the Flow Cytometric Cross Match (FCXM-supernatant) in which in vitro polyclonally activated mBCs culture supernatants and potential donor's lymphocytes being used for the mBC detection. FCXM-supernatant assays were performed between culture supernatants of polyclonally activated mBCs obtained from 4 allosensitized multiparous women and 14 renal transplant patients, and their non-alloimmunized spouses' or donors' lymphocytes, and vice versa. HLA typing was performed by SSP method. Anti-HLA antibodies produced by in vitro activated alloreactive mBCs were also evaluated by the Luminex assays. The success of in vitro polyclonal activation of mBCs was evaluated by a total IgG ELISA test and antibody secreting cell analyses by FC. Donor specific alloreactive mBCs were detected by FCXM-supernatant in 45% of the 18 allosensitized cases. Detection rate was 85% (6 out of 7) in the strongly allosensitized cases. No alloreactive mBCs was detected in control cases without allosensitization. FCXM-supernatant negative results of the allosensitized cases were related to low level of allosensitization and insufficient polyclonal stimulation evaluated by total IgG antibody tests of the supernatants. We herein report a practical methodology for alloreactive mBC detection as a donor specific manner using the FCXM-supernatant assay so that this would easily be transformed into a routine test performed in tissue typing laboratories.
Collapse
|
14
|
Louis K, Macedo C, Lefaucheur C, Metes D. Adaptive immune cell responses as therapeutic targets in antibody-mediated organ rejection. Trends Mol Med 2022; 28:237-250. [PMID: 35093288 PMCID: PMC8882148 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Humoral alloimmunity of organ transplant recipient to donor can lead to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), causing thousands of organ transplants to fail each year worldwide. However, the mechanisms of adaptive immune cell responses at the basis of humoral alloimmunity have not been entirely understood. In this review, we discuss how recent investigations have uncovered the key contributions of T follicular helper (TFH) and B cells and their coordinated actions in driving donor-specific antibody generation and immune progression towards ABMR. We show how recognition of the role of TFH-B cell interactions may allow the elaboration of improved clinical strategies for immune monitoring and the identification of novel therapeutic targets to tackle ABMR that will ultimately improve organ transplant survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Louis
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Human Immunology and Immunopathology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR 976, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Camila Macedo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR 970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Diana Metes
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
In 2016, the European Hematology Association (EHA) published the EHA Roadmap for European Hematology Research1 aiming to highlight achievements in the diagnostics and treatment of blood disorders, and to better inform European policy makers and other stakeholders about the urgent clinical and scientific needs and priorities in the field of hematology. Each section was coordinated by 1–2 section editors who were leading international experts in the field. In the 5 years that have followed, advances in the field of hematology have been plentiful. As such, EHA is pleased to present an updated Research Roadmap, now including eleven sections, each of which will be published separately. The updated EHA Research Roadmap identifies the most urgent priorities in hematology research and clinical science, therefore supporting a more informed, focused, and ideally a more funded future for European hematology research. The 11 EHA Research Roadmap sections include Normal Hematopoiesis; Malignant Lymphoid Diseases; Malignant Myeloid Diseases; Anemias and Related Diseases; Platelet Disorders; Blood Coagulation and Hemostatic Disorders; Transfusion Medicine; Infections in Hematology; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; CAR-T and Other Cell-based Immune Therapies; and Gene Therapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Stampf S, Mueller NJ, van Delden C, Pascual M, Manuel O, Banz V, Binet I, De Geest S, Bochud PY, Leichtle A, Schaub S, Steiger J, Koller M. Cohort profile: The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS): A nationwide longitudinal cohort study of all solid organ recipients in Switzerland. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e051176. [PMID: 34911712 PMCID: PMC8679072 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS) is a prospective multicentre cohort study which started to actively enrol study participants in May 2008. It takes advantage of combining data from all transplant programmes in one unique system to perform comprehensive nationwide reporting and to promote translational and clinical post-transplant outcome research in the framework of Swiss transplantation medicine. PARTICIPANTS Over 5500 solid organ transplant recipients have been enrolled in all six Swiss transplant centres by end of 2019, around three-quarter of them for kidney and liver transplants. Ninety-three per cent of all transplanted recipients have consented to study participation, almost all of them (99%) contributed to bio-sampling. The STCS genomic data set includes around 3000 patients. FINDINGS TO DATE Detailed clinical and laboratory data in high granularity as well as patient-reported outcomes from transplant recipients and activities in Switzerland are available in the last decade. Interdisciplinary contributions in diverse fields of transplantation medicine such as infectious diseases, genomics, oncology, immunology and psychosocial science have resulted in approximately 70 scientific papers getting published in peer-review journals so far. FUTURE PLANS The STCS will deepen its efforts in personalised medicine and digital epidemiology, and will also focus on allocation research and the use of causal inference methods to make complex matters in transplant medicine more understandable and transparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Stampf
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas J Mueller
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian van Delden
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospitals Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Pascual
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Oriol Manuel
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Service of Infectious Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vanessa Banz
- Department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Binet
- Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Kantonsspital St Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Yves Bochud
- Service of Infectious Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Leichtle
- Center for Laboratory Medicine, University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Steiger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Koller
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Charreau B. Cellular and Molecular Crosstalk of Graft Endothelial Cells During AMR: Effector Functions and Mechanisms. Transplantation 2021; 105:e156-e167. [PMID: 33724240 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Graft endothelial cell (EC) injury is central to the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The ability of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to bind C1q and activate the classical complement pathway is an efficient predictor of graft rejection highlighting complement-dependent cytotoxicity as a key process operating during AMR. In the past 5 y, clinical studies further established the cellular and molecular signatures of AMR revealing the key contribution of other, IgG-dependent and -independent, effector mechanisms mediated by infiltrating NK cells and macrophages. Beyond binding to alloantigens, DSA IgG can activate NK cells and mediate antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity through interacting with Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) such as FcγRIIIa (CD16a). FcRn, a nonconventional FcγR that allows IgG recycling, is highly expressed on ECs and may contribute to the long-term persistence of DSA in blood. Activation of NK cells and macrophages results in the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IFNγ that induce transient and reversible changes in the EC phenotype and functions promoting coagulation, inflammation, vascular permeability, leukocyte trafficking. MHC class I mismatch between transplant donor and recipient can create a situation of "missing self" allowing NK cells to kill graft ECs. Depending on the microenvironment, cellular proximity with ECs may participate in macrophage polarization toward an M1 proinflammatory or an M2 phenotype favoring inflammation or vascular repair. Monocytes/macrophages participate in the loss of endothelial specificity in the process of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition involved in renal and cardiac fibrosis and AMR and may differentiate into ECs enabling vessel and graft (re)-endothelialization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Béatrice Charreau
- CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et en Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wehmeier C, Amico P, Sidler D, Wirthmüller U, Hadaya K, Ferrari-Lacraz S, Golshayan D, Aubert V, Schnyder A, Sunic K, Schachtner T, Nilsson J, Schaub S. Pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies and risk for poor first-year renal transplant outcomes: results from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2755-2768. [PMID: 34561920 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze first year renal outcomes in a nationwide prospective multicenter cohort comprising 2215 renal transplants, with a special emphasis on the presence of pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). All transplants had a complete virtual crossmatch and DSA were detected in 19% (411/2215). The investigated composite endpoint was a poor first-year outcome defined as (i) allograft failure or (ii) death or (iii) poor allograft function (eGFR ≤25 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) at one year. Two hundred and twenty-one (221/2215; 10%) transplants showed a poor first-year outcome. Rejection (24/70; 34%) was the most common reason for graft failure. First-year patient's death was rare (48/2215; 2%). There were no statistically significant differences between DSA-positive and DSA-negative transplants regarding composite and each individual endpoint, as well as reasons for graft failure and death. DSA-positive transplants experienced more frequently rejection episodes, mainly antibody-mediated rejection (both P < 0.0001). The combination of DSA and any first year rejection was associated with the overall poorest death-censored allograft survival (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, presence of pre-transplant DSA per se does not affect first year outcomes. However, DSA-positive transplants experiencing first year rejection are a high-risk population for poor allograft survival and may benefit from intense clinical surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Amico
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Berne University Hospital and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Urs Wirthmüller
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Inselspital, Berne University Hospital and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Karine Hadaya
- Divisions of Nephrology and Transplantation, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sylvie Ferrari-Lacraz
- Transplantation Immunology Unit, Service of Immunology and Allergy and Service of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Déla Golshayan
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Aubert
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Aurelia Schnyder
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Kata Sunic
- HLA Laboratory, Blutspende Schweizerisches Rotkreuz Ostschweiz, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Nilsson
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Senn L, Wehmeier C, Hönger G, Geiger I, Amico P, Hirt-Minkowski P, Steiger J, Dickenmann M, Schaub S. Outcome of Husband-to-Wife Kidney Transplantation With Mutual Children: Single Center Experience Using T Cell-Depleting Induction and Review of the Literature. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:724851. [PMID: 34409057 PMCID: PMC8365247 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.724851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Few data on husband-to-wife transplantations with mutual children (H2W) exist in the current era. We investigated the outcome of H2W transplantations (n = 25) treated with T cell-depleting induction compared to women with prior pregnancies also receiving their first HLA-mismatched kidney transplant, but from a different donor source: (i) other living donor (n = 52) and (ii) deceased donor (n = 120). Seventy-four percent of the women had ≥2 pregnancies; median follow-up time was 5 years. Death-censored allograft survival was significantly lower in the H2W group compared to the other two groups (p = 0.03). Three of four graft losses in the H2W group were due to rejection. 5-year patient survival in the H2W group was high and similar compared to the other living donor group (100 vs. 98%; p = 0.28). The incidence of (sub)clinical antibody-mediated rejection was higher in the H2W group (36 vs. 20 vs. 18%) (p = 0.10). The frequency of infections was similar among the three groups. No immunological parameter was predictive for rejection or graft loss in H2W transplantations. In conclusion, H2W transplantation is a valuable option, but associated with a higher risk for allograft loss due to rejection despite T cell-depleting induction. Further research is required for better risk prediction on an individual patient level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Senn
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gideon Hönger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostics and Immungenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Irene Geiger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Amico
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Hirt-Minkowski
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Steiger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Dickenmann
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,HLA-Diagnostics and Immungenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Karahan GE, de Vaal Y, Bakker K, Roelen D, Claas FHJ, Heidt S. Comparison of different luminex single antigen bead kits for memory B cell-derived HLA antibody detection. HLA 2021; 98:200-206. [PMID: 34216435 PMCID: PMC8456970 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Detection of HLA‐specific memory B cells can provide additional information on sensitization of alloantigen‐exposed individuals and refine immunological risk assessment. We have recently developed an assay enabling profiling of memory B cell‐derived HLA antibodies using luminex single antigen bead (SAB) assay. Here, we compared the performance of the SAB kits from two vendors for memory B cell‐derived HLA antibody detection. IgG was isolated from culture supernatants of polyclonally activated B cells from alloantigen‐exposed (n = 7) or nonexposed (n = 5) individuals, using our previously established method. Eluates containing isolated IgG from culture supernatants were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies using luminex SAB analysis from both One Lambda and Lifecodes (Immucor). In contrast to Lifecodes, high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) signals were found for negative control beads in One Lambda (median MFI for class I:1730 and for class II:728), accompanied by high MFI values for self HLA‐coated beads, especially for HLA‐C. Despite high background in the One Lambda assays, 91% concordance for HLA class I and 85% concordance for HLA class II were found between the specificities detected using SAB kits from the two vendors. Our results show that HLA‐specific memory B cells can be profiled using kits from both vendors. However, when analyzing One Lambda results one should be aware of the restrictions related to nonspecific binding particularly in HLA‐C‐coated beads, and pay attention to self HLA‐coated beads in order to accurately identify the reactivities leading to the definition of the actual HLA antibody specificities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca E Karahan
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne de Vaal
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Bakker
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dave Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oberbauer R, Meyer TW. Precision medicine in transplantation and hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36:31-36. [PMID: 34153984 PMCID: PMC8216726 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, precision medicine has already entered clinical practice. Donor and recipient human leucocyte antigen (HLA) regions are genotyped in two class 1 and usually three class 2 loci, and the individual degree of sensitization against alloimmune antigens is evaluated by the detection of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. Recently, the contribution of non-HLA mismatches to outcomes such as acute T- and B-cell-mediated rejection and even long-term graft survival was described. Tracking of specific alloimmune T- and B-cell clones by next generation sequencing and refinement of the immunogenicity of allo-epitopes specifically in the interaction with HLA and T- and B-cell receptors may further support individualized therapy. Although the choices of maintenance immunosuppression are rather limited, individualization can be accomplished by adjustment of dosing based on these risk predictors. Finally, supplementing histopathology by a transcriptomics analysis allows for a biological interpretation of the histological findings and avoids interobserver variability of results. In contrast to transplantation, the prescription of hemodialysis therapy is far from precise. Guidelines do not consider modifications by age, diet or many comorbid conditions. Patients with residual kidney function routinely receive the same treatment as those without. A major barrier hitherto is the definition of 'adequate' treatment based on urea removal. Kt/Vurea and related parameters neither reflect the severity of uremic symptoms nor predict long-term outcomes. Urea is poorly representative for numerous other compounds that accumulate in the body when the kidneys fail, yet clinicians prescribe treatment based on its measurement. Modern technology has provided the means to identify other solutes responsible for specific features of uremic illness and their measurement will be a necessary step in moving beyond the standardized prescription of hemodialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer Oberbauer
- Klinische Abteilung für Nephrologie und Dialyse, Medical University of
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Timothy W Meyer
- Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University,
Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Histologic Antibody-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection in the Absence of Donor Specific HLA Antibodies. Transplantation 2021; 105:e181-e190. [PMID: 33901113 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Histologic antibody-mediated rejection (hAMR) is defined as a kidney allograft biopsy satisfying the first 2 Banff criteria for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR): tissue injury and evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with the endothelium. In approximately one-half of such cases, circulating HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are not detectable by current methodology at the time of biopsy. Some studies indicated a better prognosis for HLA-DSA-negative cases of hAMR compared to those with detectable HLA-DSA, whereas others found equally poor survival compared to hAMR-negative cases. We reviewed the literature regarding the pathophysiology of HLA-DSA-negative hAMR. We find 3 nonmutually exclusive possibilities: 1) HLA-DSA are involved, but just not detected; 2) non-HLA DSA (allo- or autoantibodies) are pathogenically involved; and/or 3) antibody-independent NK cell activation is mediating the process through "missing self" or other activating mechanisms. These possibilities are discussed in detail. Recommendations regarding the approach to such patients are made. Clearly, more research is necessary regarding the measurement of non-HLA antibodies, recipient/donor NK cell genotyping, and the use of antibody reduction therapy or other immunosuppression in any subset of patients with HLA-DSA-negative hAMR.
Collapse
|
23
|
Karahan GE, Claas FHJ, Heidt S. Pre-existing Alloreactive T and B Cells and Their Possible Relevance for Pre-transplant Risk Estimation in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:340. [PMID: 32793610 PMCID: PMC7385137 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In allogeneic transplantation, genetic disparities between patient and donor may lead to cellular and humoral immune responses mediated by both naïve and memory alloreactive cells of the adaptive immune system. This review will focus on alloreactive T and B cells with emphasis on the memory compartment, their role in relation to kidney rejection, and in vitro assays to detect these alloreactive cells. Finally, the potential additional value of utilizing donor-specific memory T and B cell assays supplementary to current routine pre-transplant risk assessment of kidney transplant recipients will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca E Karahan
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Donor-specific B Cell Memory in Alloimmunized Kidney Transplant Recipients: First Clinical Application of a Novel Method: Erratum. Transplantation 2020; 104:e221. [PMID: 32569009 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
25
|
Wehmeier C, Karahan GE, Heidt S. HLA-specific memory B-cell detection in kidney transplantation: Insights and future challenges. Int J Immunogenet 2020; 47:227-234. [PMID: 32390325 PMCID: PMC7317812 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Humoral alloimmunity mediated by anti‐human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is a major challenge in kidney transplantation and impairs the longevity of the transplanted organ. The immunological risk of an individual patient is currently mainly assessed by detection of HLA antibodies in the serum, which are produced by long‐lived bone marrow‐residing plasma cells. However, humoral alloimmunity is complex, and alloreactive memory B cells constitute an additional factor in the interplay of immune cells. These recirculating “silent” cells are responsible for the immunological recall response by differentiating into antibody‐producing cells upon antigen re‐encounter. Historically, due to the lack of appropriate and routinely applicable assays to determine the presence and HLA specificity of alloreactive memory B cells, their contribution to the humoral alloimmune response has clinically often been suspected but could not be determined. In this review, we give an overview of recent advances in techniques to detect alloreactive memory B cells and discuss their strengths and limitations. Furthermore, we summarize experiences with these techniques in alloimmunized individuals and transplant recipients, thereby emphasizing unmet needs to be addressed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gonca E Karahan
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|