1
|
Khalili M, Famure O, Minkovich M, Tinckam KJ, Kim SJ. Selective Elimination and Rationalization of Cell-based Assays in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Crossmatching. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1603. [PMID: 38464424 PMCID: PMC10923350 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background While there is increasing reliance on a negative virtual crossmatch to proceed with deceased donor kidney transplantation, a flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) is still usually performed after the transplant has already occurred. Our center has eliminated pretransplant physical crossmatches for most patients, and since 2018, we have eliminated the systematic performance of posttransplant FCXMs. Methods We studied all deceased donor kidney transplants in our program between June 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021, to evaluate the impact of eliminating retrospective FCXMs on resource utilization and graft outcomes (ie, the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection [AMR] in the first 3-mo posttransplant). Results A total of 358 kidney transplants occurred during the study period, and approximately 70% of these transplants proceeded without the performance of any FCXM. Incidence rates of AMR were low (9.63 per 1000 person-months), which compared favorably with the incidence rate of AMR during the 3-y period preceding the policy (4.82 per 1000 person-months, P = 0.21). Conclusions Our results suggest that moving away from retrospective FCXM and relying exclusively on the virtual crossmatch is safe and efficient for kidney allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Khalili
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Olusegun Famure
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Minkovich
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathryn J Tinckam
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sang Joseph Kim
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rocha Y, Jaramillo A, Neumann J, Hacke K, Palou E, Torres J. Crossmatch assays in transplantation: Physical or virtual?: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36527. [PMID: 38115324 PMCID: PMC10727546 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The value of the crossmatch test in assessing pretransplant immunological risk is vital for clinical decisions, ranging from the indication of the transplant to the guidance of induction protocols and treatment with immunosuppressants. The crossmatch tests in transplantation can be physical or virtual, each with its advantages and limitations. Currently, the virtual crossmatch stands out for its sensitivity and specificity compared to the physical tests. Additionally, the virtual crossmatch can be performed in less time, allowing for a reduction in cold ischemia time. It shows a good correlation with the results of physical tests and does not negatively impact graft survival. Proper communication between clinicians and the transplant immunology laboratory will lead to a deeper understanding of each patient's immunological profile, better donor-recipient selection, and improved graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrés Jaramillo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Jorge Neumann
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Katrin Hacke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Torres
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roll GR, Bray RA, Cooper M, Eagar TN, Gebel HM, Vranic GM, Hitchman KM, Houp J, Kamoun M, Killian J, Kim J, Kumar V, Levine M, Lovasik BP, Lunow-Luke T, Parsons RF, Pattanayak V, Ranch D, Shah A, Stock PG, Timofeeva OA, Trofe-Clark J, Wongjirad C, Yeh H, Yi S, Rajalingam R. COVID-19 infection and vaccination rarely impact HLA antibody profile in waitlisted renal transplant Candidates- a multicenter cohort. Hum Immunol 2023; 84:278-285. [PMID: 36868898 PMCID: PMC9946887 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Although rare, infection and vaccination can result in antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We analyzed the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination on HLA antibodies in waitlisted renal transplant candidates. Specificities were collected and adjudicated if the calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) changed after exposure. Of 409 patients, 285 (69.7 %) had an initial cPRA of 0 %, and 56 (13.7 %) had an initial cPRA > 80 %. The cPRA changed in 26 patients (6.4 %), 16 (3.9 %) increased, and 10 (2.4 %) decreased. Based on cPRA adjudication, cPRA differences generally resulted from a small number of specificities with subtle fluctuations around the borderline of the participating centers' cutoff for unacceptable antigen listing. All five COVID recovered patients with an increased cPRA were female (p = 0.02). In summary, exposure to this virus or vaccine does not increase HLA antibody specificities and their MFI in approximately 99 % of cases and 97 % of sensitized patients. These results have implications for virtual crossmatching at the time of organ offer after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, and these events of unclear clinical significance should not influence vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett R. Roll
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Robert A. Bray
- Histocompatibility and Molecular Immunogenetics Laboratory, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Medstar-Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Todd N. Eagar
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Howard M. Gebel
- Histocompatibility and Molecular Immunogenetics Laboratory, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Gayle M. Vranic
- Medstar-Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kelley M.K. Hitchman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Julie Houp
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United Kingdom
| | - Malek Kamoun
- Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - John Killian
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United Kingdom
| | - Jim Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Levine
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Brendan P. Lovasik
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tyler Lunow-Luke
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ronald F. Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Vikram Pattanayak
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA, United States
| | - Daniel Ranch
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Anushi Shah
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Peter G. Stock
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Olga A. Timofeeva
- Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jennifer Trofe-Clark
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Chelsey Wongjirad
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Heidi Yeh
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Stephanie Yi
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Raja Rajalingam
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calabrese DR, Chong T, Singer JP, Rajalingam R, Hays SR, Kukreja J, Leard L, Golden JA, Lanier LL, Greenland JR. CD16 + natural killer cells in bronchoalveolar lavage are associated with antibody-mediated rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:37-44. [PMID: 36695619 PMCID: PMC10018437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Acute and chronic rejections limit the long-term survival after lung transplant. Pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an incompletely understood driver of long-term outcomes characterized by donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), innate immune infiltration, and evidence of complement activation. Natural killer (NK) cells may recognize DSAs via the CD16 receptor, but this complement-independent mechanism of injury has not been explored in pulmonary AMR. CD16+ NK cells were quantified in 508 prospectively collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from 195 lung transplant recipients. Associations between CD16+ NK cells and human leukocyte antigen mismatches, DSAs, and AMR grade were assessed by linear models adjusted for participant characteristics and repeat measures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess CD16+ NK cell association with chronic lung allograft dysfunction and survival. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid CD16+ NK cell frequency was associated with increasing human leukocyte antigens mismatches and increased AMR grade. Although NK frequencies were similar between DSA+ and DSA- recipients, CD16+ NK cell frequencies were greater in recipients with AMR and those with concomitant allograft dysfunction. CD16+ NK cells were associated with long-term graft dysfunction after AMR and decreased chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival. These data support the role of CD16+ NK cells in pulmonary AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Calabrese
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Tiffany Chong
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jonathan P Singer
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Raja Rajalingam
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steven R Hays
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jasleen Kukreja
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lorriana Leard
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Golden
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lewis L Lanier
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John R Greenland
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aspectos técnicos y clínicos de la prueba cruzada de histocompatibilidad en el trasplante de órganos sólidos. BIOMÉDICA 2022; 42:391-413. [PMID: 35867930 PMCID: PMC9467682 DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.6255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
La presencia de anticuerpos dirigidos contra los antígenos leucocitarios humanos (Human Leukocyte Antigens, HLA) que se expresan en las células del donante, es uno de los factores de riesgo más importantes asociados con las complicaciones clínicas después del trasplante. La prueba cruzada es una de las pruebas de histocompatibilidad más eficaces para la detección de anticuerpos específicos contra el donante en los receptores de injertos. En los primeros métodos de la prueba cruzada, se utilizaba la citotoxicidad dependiente del complemento, que es útil para detectar dichos anticuerpos responsables del rechazo hiperagudo del injerto, pero carece de la sensibilidad adecuada. Por ello, se desarrollaron métodos de pruebas cruzadas más sensibles, entre ellas, la prueba cruzada por citometría de flujo que hoy se considera el método preferido. En este artículo se revisa la evolución de la prueba cruzada y los factores más importantes que deben tenerse en cuenta al realizarla y al interpretar los resultados de esta prueba fundamental para la supervivencia a largo plazo del injerto.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wade J, Roback JD, Krummey SM, Gebel HM, Bray RA, Sullivan HC. Implementing virtual crossmatch based diagnostic management teams in human leukocyte antigen laboratories and transplant programs. Transpl Immunol 2022; 73:101629. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1179-1188. [PMID: 35685330 PMCID: PMC9171621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are the primary determinants of alloimmunity. A crossmatch test is a test that determines the immunologic risk of a recipient with a potential donor by ensuring that there are no transplant-relevant circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against donor antigens. Physical crossmatch (PXM) tests, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), require mixing of patient serum and donor cells, are labor intensive, and are logistically challenging. Virtual crossmatch (VXM) test assesses immunologic compatibility between recipient and potential donor by analyzing the results of 2 independently done physical laboratory tests—patient anti-HLA antibody and donor HLA typing. The goal of VXM is pretransplant risk stratification—though there is no consensus on whether such risk assessment involves predicting the PXM result or the posttransplant outcome. Although the concept of VXM is not new, the advent of solid-phase assays for detecting circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against individual HLA and DNA-based methods for typing donor HLA specificities at a higher resolution makes the routine use of VXM a reality. Accordingly, VXM may be applied at different scenarios—both for sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Implementation of VXM-based approach has resulted in statistically significant reduction in cold ischemia time without an increase in hyperacute rejection episodes. Though there are considerable challenges, VXM is expected to be used more often in the future, depending on the transplant center’s tolerance of immunologic risk.
Collapse
|
8
|
Concurrent use of two independent methods prevents erroneous HLA typing of deceased organ donors – An important strategy for patient safety and accurate virtual crossmatching for broader sharing. Hum Immunol 2022; 83:458-466. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
9
|
Peacock S, Briggs D, Barnardo M, Battle R, Brookes P, Callaghan C, Clark B, Collins C, Day S, Diaz Burlinson N, Dunn P, Fernando R, Fuggle S, Harmer A, Kallon D, Keegan D, Key T, Lawson E, Lloyd S, Martin J, McCaughan J, Middleton D, Partheniou F, Poles A, Rees T, Sage D, Santos-Nunez E, Shaw O, Willicombe M, Worthington J. BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2021; 49:22-29. [PMID: 34555264 PMCID: PMC9292213 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
All UK H&I laboratories and transplant units operate under a single national kidney offering policy, but there have been variations in approach regarding when to undertake the pre‐transplant crossmatch test. In order to minimize cold ischaemia times for deceased donor kidney transplantation we sought to find ways to be able to report a crossmatch result as early as possible in the donation process. A panel of experts in transplant surgery, nephrology, specialist nursing in organ donation and H&I (all relevant UK laboratories represented) assessed evidence and opinion concerning five factors that relate to the effectiveness of the crossmatch process, as follows: when the result should be ready for reporting; what level of donor HLA typing is needed; crossmatch sample type and availability; fairness and equity; risks and patient safety. Guidelines aimed at improving practice based on these issues are presented, and we expect that following these will allow H&I laboratories to contribute to reducing CIT in deceased donor kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Peacock
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Briggs
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Birmingham Vincent Drive, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Barnardo
- Clinical Transplant Immunology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - R Battle
- H&I Laboratory, SNBTS, Edinburgh, UK
| | - P Brookes
- H&I Laboratory, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - C Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - B Clark
- H&I Laboratory, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - C Collins
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Birmingham Vincent Drive, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Day
- H&I Laboratory, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - N Diaz Burlinson
- Transplantation Laboratory, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - P Dunn
- Transplant Laboratory, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - R Fernando
- H&I Laboratory, The Anthony Nolan Laboratories, Royal Free Hospital, UK
| | - S Fuggle
- Organ Donation & Transplantation, NHSBT, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, UK
| | - A Harmer
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Barnsley Centre, Barnsley, UK
| | - D Kallon
- H & I Laboratory, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Keegan
- Department of H&I, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, UK
| | - T Key
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Barnsley Centre, Barnsley, UK
| | - E Lawson
- Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHSBT, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Lloyd
- Welsh Transplantation & Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cardiff, UK
| | - J Martin
- H&I Laboratory, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - J McCaughan
- H&I Laboratory, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - D Middleton
- H&I Laboratory, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - F Partheniou
- H&I Laboratory, Liverpool Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Poles
- H&I Laboratory, University Hospitals Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.,H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Filton, Bristol, UK
| | - T Rees
- Welsh Transplantation & Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cardiff, UK
| | - D Sage
- H&I Laboratory, NHSBT Tooting Centre, London, UK
| | - E Santos-Nunez
- H&I Laboratory, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - O Shaw
- H&I Laboratory, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas, London, UK
| | - M Willicombe
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, UK
| | - J Worthington
- Transplantation Laboratory, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rosser C, Sage D. Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients. Int J Immunogenet 2021; 48:385-402. [PMID: 34346180 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Rosser
- NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting), Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, London, UK
| | - Deborah Sage
- NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting), Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trends and impact on cold ischemia time and clinical outcomes using virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States. Kidney Int 2021; 100:660-671. [PMID: 33940109 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
For assessing human leukocyte antigen compatibility in deceased donor kidney transplantation, virtual crossmatch is used as an alternative to physical crossmatch and has potential to reduce cold ischemia time. The 2014 United States kidney allocation system prioritized highly sensitized candidates but led to increased shipping of kidneys. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we evaluated changes in virtual crossmatch use with the new allocation policy and the impact of virtual crossmatch use on cold ischemia time and transplant outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult deceased donor kidney recipients in the United States (2011-2018) transplanted with either 9,632 virtual or 71,839 physical crossmatches. Before allocation change, only 9% of transplants were performed relying on a virtual crossmatch. After the 2014 allocation change, this increased by 2.4%/year so that 18% transplants in 2018 were performed with just a virtual crossmatch. There was significant variation in virtual crossmatch use among transplant regions (range 0.7-36%) and higher use was noted among large volume centers. Compared to physical crossmatches, virtual crossmatches were significantly associated with shorter cold ischemia times (mean 15.0 vs 16.5 hours) and similar death-censored graft loss and mortality (both hazard ratios HR 0.99) at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. Thus, our results show that virtual crossmatch is an attractive strategy for shortening cold ischemia time without negatively impacting transplant outcomes. Hence, strategies to optimize use and reduce practice variation may allow for maximizing benefits from virtual crossmatch.
Collapse
|
12
|
Roll GR, Lunow-Luke T, Braun HJ, Buenaventura O, Mallari M, Stock PG, Rajalingam R. COVID-19 does not impact HLA antibody profile in a series of waitlisted renal transplant candidates. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:568-573. [PMID: 33910707 PMCID: PMC8052475 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
HLA antibodies are typically produced after exposure to transplanted tissue, pregnancy, and blood products. Sensitization delays access to transplantation and preclude utilization of donor organs. Infections and vaccinations have also been reported to result in HLA antibody formation. It is not known if patients develop HLA antibodies after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Here we analyzed a series of eighteen patients waiting for kidney transplantation who had symptomatic COVID-19 disease and recovered. None of the patients in this initial series developed de novo HLA antibodies. Notably, there was no increase in preexisting HLA antibodies in four highly sensitized patients with a CPRA > 80%. These preliminary data suggest that there may not be a need to repeat HLA antibody testing or perform a physical crossmatch on admission serum before kidney transplant for COVID-19 recovered patients. Data from a large number of patients with different demographics needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett R Roll
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Tyler Lunow-Luke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Hillary J Braun
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Owen Buenaventura
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Mirelle Mallari
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Peter G Stock
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Raja Rajalingam
- Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoo J, Lee S, Lee HW, Lee S, Choi J, Han J, Kang H, Choi A, Hee Jang J, Oh EJ. Assessment of Rapid Optimized 96-well Tray Flow Cytometric Crossmatch (Halifax-FCXM) with Luminex Single Antigen Test. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:302-308. [PMID: 33744026 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Flow cytometric crossmatch assay (FCXM) is a sensitive cell-based method for evaluating the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) before transplantation. Recently, 96-well tray FCXM protocol (Halifax FCXM) with improved test efficiency has been introduced. The objective of the present study was to assess the performance of Halifax FCXM by correlating with DSA results based on single antigen bead (SAB) assays (virtual crossmatch, VXM). METHODS A total of 341 FCXMs were evaluated for the detection of HLA-DSA. A positive VXM was defined as having at least one HLA - DSA (HLA-A, B, Cw, DR, DQB1) with ≥ 1000 MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) identified by SAB assay. RESULTS Of a total 341 cases, 113 showed class I VXM (+) with class I DSA MFI ≥ 1000 exclusively against one or more donor HLA class I antigens (HLA-A, B, Cw), 72 had class I-/II + DSA, and 156 had VXM(-). Halifax T-FCXM showed a sensitivity of 87.6% (99/113) and a specificity of 98.2% (224/228) for detecting class I VXM (+). The concordance between T-FCXM and class I VXM was 94.7% (323/341). Halifax B-FCXM showed a sensitivity of 58.3% (42/72) and a specificity of 98.7% (154/156) for detecting class I-/II + DSAs. The concordance between B-FCXM and class I-/II + VXM was 86.0% (196/228). When we separately analyzed data, B-FCXM detected HLA-DR (+) (68.8%) and HLA-DQ (+) DSAs (71.0%) similarly (P > 0.05). T-FCXM detected 87.6%, 97.2%, and 98.2% of class I DSA-positive cases with MFI values (sumDSA) ≥ 1000, ≥ 3000, and ≥ 5000, respectively. B-FCXM detected 58.3% of class I-II + DSA -positive (≥1000) cases, but detected 76.7% (33/43) and 89.2% (33/37) of class I-II + DSAs if MFI values of sumDSA and immunodominant DSA (iDSA) were above 5000, respectively. Halifax FCXM had sensitivities of 91.5% and 96.2% for detecting VXM (+) having MFI values above 5000 for class I or class II sumDSA and iDSA, respectively. CONCLUSION Halifax FCXM showed a good correlation, especially with SAB assay-based high MFI DSA or sumDSA. Concurrent application of FCXM with VXM can improve pre-transplant risk assessment and progress organ allocation efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeeun Yoo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangyoon Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Won Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Soojung Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Jieun Choi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeho Han
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunhye Kang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Aeran Choi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Hee Jang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Jee Oh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lemieux W, Mohammadhassanzadeh H, Klement W, Daniel C, Sapir-Pichhadze R. Matchmaker, matchmaker make me a match: Opportunities and challenges in optimizing compatibility of HLA eplets in transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2021; 48:135-144. [PMID: 33426788 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is a major complication in transplantation, which is associated with inferior graft survival, impaired quality of life, and increased healthcare costs. DSA develop upon recognition of nonself HLA by the recipient's immune system. HLA molecules contain epitopes, which are the surface regions of HLA molecules recognized by antibodies. HLAMatchmaker is an algorithm for assessing donor:recipient HLA compatibility at the level of structurally defined HLA targets called eplets. The consideration of eplets, rather than the whole HLA molecule, could offer some advantages when classifying the immune risk associated with particular donor:recipient pairs. Assessing compatibility at the level of HLA eplets could decrease misclassification of post-transplant immune risk by improving specificity, when antibodies are confirmed to be directed against donor eplets missing from the recipient's repertoire of eplets. Consideration of eplets may also increase the sensitivity of immune risk assessment, when identifying mismatched eplets that could give rise to new, not previously detected, donor-specific antibodies post-transplant. Eplet matching can serve as a rational strategy for immune risk mitigation. Herein, we review the evolution of HLA (in) compatibility assessment for organ allocation. We outline challenges in the implementation of eplet-based donor:recipient matching, including unavailability of allele-level donor genotypes for 11 HLA loci at the time of organ allocation and difficulty in assessing the hierarchy of immune risk associated with particular HLA eplet mismatches. Opportunities to address some of the current shortcomings of donor genotyping and HLAMatchmaker are also discussed. While there is a demonstrated benefit in the application of HLAMatchmaker for donor: recipient HLA (in)compatibility assessment, evolving long-read genotyping methods, compilation of large data sets with allele-level genotypes, and standardization of methods to verify eplets as determinants of immune-mediated injuries are required before HLA eplet matching is implemented in organ allocation to improve upon transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Lemieux
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Hossein Mohammadhassanzadeh
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - William Klement
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claude Daniel
- Division of Hematology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Division of Nephrology and the Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A blueprint for electronic utilization of ambiguous molecular HLA typing data in organ allocation systems and virtual crossmatch. Hum Immunol 2020; 81:65-72. [PMID: 32057520 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Virtual crossmatch (VXM) compares a transplant candidate's unacceptable antigens to the HLA typing of the donor before an organ offer is accepted and, in selected cases, supplant a prospective physical crossmatch. However, deceased donor typing can be ambiguous, leading to uncertainty in compatibility prediction. We have developed a prototype web application that utilizes ambiguous HLA molecular typing data to predict which unacceptable antigens are present in the donor HLA genotype as donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The application compares a candidate's listed unacceptable antigens to computed probabilities of all possible two-field donor HLA alleles and UNOS antigens. The VIrtual CrossmaTch for mOleculaR HLA typing (VICTOR) tool can be accessed at http://www.transplanttoolbox.org/victor. We reanalyzed historical VXM cases where a transplant center's manual interpretation of molecular typing results influenced offer evaluation. We found that interpretation of ambiguous donor molecular typing data using imputation could one day influence VXM decisions if the DSA predictions were rigorously validated. Standardized interpretation of molecular typing data, if applied to the match run, could also change which offers are made. HLA typing ambiguity has been an underappreciated source of immunological risk in organ transplantation. The VICTOR tool can serve as a testbed for development of allocation policies with the aim of decreasing offers refused due to HLA incompatibility.
Collapse
|
16
|
Morris AB, Sullivan HC, Krummey SM, Gebel HM, Bray RA. Out with the old, in with the new: Virtual versus physical crossmatching in the modern era. HLA 2019; 94:471-481. [PMID: 31515937 DOI: 10.1111/tan.13693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The virtual crossmatch (VXM) is gaining acceptance as an alternative approach to assess donor:recipient compatibility prior to transplantation. In contrast to a physical crossmatch, the virtual crossmatch does not require viable donor cells but rather relies on complete HLA typing of the donor and current antibody assessment of the recipient. Thus, the VXM can be performed in minutes which allows for faster transplant decisions thereby increasing the likelihood that organs can be shipped across significant distances yet safely transplanted. Here, we present a brief review of the past 50 years of histocompatibility testing; from the original complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch in 1969 to the new era of molecular HLA typing, solid-phase antibody testing and virtual crossmatching. These advancements have shaped a paradigm shift in our approach to transplantation. That is, foregoing a prospective physical crossmatch in favor of a VXM. In this review, we undertake an in-depth analysis of the pros- and cons- of physical and virtual crossmatching.Finally, we provide objective data on the selected use of the VXM which demonstrate the value of a VXM in lieu of the traditional physical crossmatch for safe and efficient organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna B Morris
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - H C Sullivan
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Bray
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|