Liver Transplantation of HCV-viremic Donors Into HCV-negative Recipients in the United States: Increasing Frequency With Profound Geographic Variation

Trends in candidate HCV NAT+ listing and associated impacts on liver transplantation waitlist outcomes

Direct-acting antiviral agents have facilitated the utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ organs in HCV nucleic acid amplification test (NAT)- recipients. We evaluated trends in HCV NAT+ listing and impact on transplant probability, waitlist mortality, and likelihood of receiving HCV NAT+ organs using the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset of adult patients waitlisted for liver transplantation from 1/2016-9/2023. Multivariable regression models accounting for competing risks were fit to study waitlist outcomes. 21,776 patients were initially listed for HCV NAT+ organs while 45,378 were not. The percentage of waitlisted patients listed for these organs increased significantly from 2016 to 2023 (8.8% to 60.8%, p<0.001). Initial HCV NAT+ listing was associated with a waitlist mortality benefit in 2021-2023 (SHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.79, p<0.001) and 17% reduced hazard of overall mortality (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89, p<0.001). 16.0% of the total protective effect associated with HCV NAT+ listing on overall survival was mediated through actual receipt of HCV NAT+ organs (TERERI of -0.160 and a PIE of -0.026; p<0.001). Patients not listed for HCV NAT+ organs in the modern era are relatively disadvantaged in terms of waitlist outcomes. While listings have risen over time, there remains center-level and geographic variation.

Center and Individual Willingness to Consider Heart and Lung Offers From Donors With Hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Transplants with hearts and lungs from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV D+) have been proven safe and effective since development of direct-acting antivirals, yet the presence of HCV + persists as a reason to decline organs.

METHODS

We identified adult candidates listed January 1, 2015-March 8, 2023 for heart or lung transplant using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We identified individual-level and center-level characteristics associated with listing to consider HCV D+ offers using multilevel logistic regression in a multivariable framework.

RESULTS

Over the study period, the annual percentage of candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers increased for both heart (9.5%-74.3%) and lung (7.8%-59.5%), as did the percentage of centers listing candidates for HCV D+ heart (52.9%-91.1%) and lung (32.8%-82.8%) offers. Candidates at centers with more experience with HCV D+ transplants were more likely to consider HCV D+ organ offers. After adjustment, listing center explained 70% and 78% of the residual variance in willingness to consider HCV D+ hearts and lungs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although listing for consideration of HCV D+ offers has increased, it varies by transplant center. Center-level barriers to consideration of HCV D+ organs reduce recipients' transplant access.

Regional Differences and Temporal Changes in the Utilization of HCV-Viremic Donors in Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Despite the data demonstrating an increased utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic kidneys, the acceptance and incorporation of HCV-viremic kidneys are not universal. We aimed to identify regional differences and their temporal changes in the utilization of HCV-viremic kidneys.

METHODS

Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, HCV-viremic kidneys utilized in kidney transplants from March 15, 2019, to March 14, 2023, were included. The utilization of HCV-viremic kidneys across the United States and center-level clustering of HCV-viremic donor kidney transplants into HCV NAT-negative recipients (HCV D+/R- transplants) using Gini coefficients were examined.

RESULTS

Significant regional variations were observed, with regions 3, 10, and 11 accounting for 51% of all HCV-viremic kidney utilization. Region 9 benefited the most from HCV-viremic kidney transplants with a high influx of kidney imports from other regions (284.9% gain). Region 8 and region 6 encountered the most substantial losses, with net losses of -44.2% and -41.1%, respectively. HCV D+/R- transplants were concentrated in specific high-volume centers, but trends indicated a gradual increase in a more equitable distribution across centers over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variations can be observed in the utilization of HCV-viremic kidneys throughout the United States. These variations highlight opportunities for kidney transplant centers in specific regions to adopt policies for HCV-viremic kidney transplants, thereby expanding their donor pool. Encouragingly, an increasing number of kidney transplant centers are adopting HCV D+/R- kidney transplants, indicating positive progress. These trends suggest a more balanced access to HCV-viremic kidneys ahead.

Effect of the opioid crisis on the liver transplantation donor pool: A national analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade there has been a surge in overdose deaths due to the opioid crisis. We sought to characterize the temporal change in overdose donor (OD) use in liver transplantation (LT), as well as associated post-LT outcomes, relative to the COVID-19 era.

METHODS

LT candidates and donors listed between January 2016 and September 2022 were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Trends in LT donors and changes related to OD were assessed pre- versus post-COVID-19 (February 2020).

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2022, most counties in the United States experienced an increase in overdose-related deaths (n = 1284, 92.3%) with many counties (n = 458, 32.9%) having more than a doubling in drug overdose deaths. Concurrently, there was an 11.2% increase in overall donors, including a 41.7% increase in the number of donors who died from drug overdose. In pre-COVID-19 overdose was the 4th top mechanism of donor death, while in the post-COVID-19 era, overdose was the 2nd most common cause of donor death. OD was younger (OD: 35 yrs, IQR 29-43 vs. non-OD: 43 yrs, IQR 31-56), had lower body mass index (≥35 kg/cm2, OD: 31.2% vs. non-OD: 33.5%), and was more likely to be HCV+ (OD: 28.9% vs. non-OD: 5.4%) with lower total bilirubin (≥1.1 mg/dL, OD: 12.9% vs. non-OD: 20.1%) (all p < .001). Receipt of an OD was not associated with worse graft survival (HR .94, 95% CI .88-1.01, p = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid deaths markedly increased following the COVID-19 pandemic, substantially altering the LT donor pool in the United States.

Current Status of Liver Transplantation in North America

Liver transplantation indications continue to evolve in North America. Several recent changes have occurred in the field with changes in the allocation system, new performance metrics, expansion of transplant oncology, and utilization of ex vivo perfusion devices and techniques. Deceased donor liver transplantation continues to be the primary modality of liver transplantation in North America, with an ongoing focus on advancing the use of living donor liver transplantation, especially in those patients who may not have favorable access to deceased donor allografts.

Outcomes of kidney, liver, and simultaneous liver and kidney transplants from hepatitis c infected donors to hepatitis c naïve recipients: A large single center experience

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAAs), the non-use rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donor organs (D+) has decreased significantly. We present the donor, recipient, and transplant allograft characteristics, along with recipient outcomes, in one of the largest cohorts of HCV-D+ transplants into HCV-naïve recipients (R-).

METHODS

Charts of HCV D+/R- kidney (KT), liver (LT), and simultaneous liver-kidney (SLKT) transplant recipients between January 2019 and July 2022 were reviewed. Primary outcomes of interest included waitlist times and 1-year graft failure. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, post-transplant complications, effectiveness of DAA therapy, and characteristics of patients who relapsed from initial DAA therapy.

RESULTS

Fifty-five HCV D+/R- transplants at our center [42 KT (26 nucleic acid testing positive [NAT+], 16 NAT-), 12 LT (eight NAT+, four NAT-), and one SLKT (NAT+)] had a median waitlist time of 69 days for KT, 87 days for LT, and 15 days for SLKT. There were no graft failures at 1 year. All viremic recipients were treated with a 12-week course of DAAs, of which 100% achieved end of treatment response (EOTR)-85.7% (n = 30) achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) and 14.3% relapsed (n = 5; four KT, one LT). All relapsed recipients were retreated and achieved SVR. The most common post-transplantation complications include BK virus infection (n = 9) for KT and non-allograft infections (n = 4) for LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has demonstrated no graft failures or recipient deaths at 1 year, and despite a 14.3% relapse rate, we achieved 100% SVR. Complications rates of D+/R- appeared comparable to national D-/R- complication rates. Further studies comparing D+/R- to D-/R- outcomes are needed.

Geographic disparities in access to liver transplantation

Since the Final Rule regarding transplantation was published in 1999, organ distribution policies have been implemented to reduce geographic disparity. While a recent change in liver allocation, termed acuity circles, eliminated the donor service area as a unit of distribution to decrease the geographic disparity of waitlisted patients to liver transplantation, recently published results highlight the complexity of addressing geographic disparity. From geographic variation in donor supply, as well as liver disease burden and differing model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores of candidates and MELD scores necessary to receive liver transplantation, to the urban-rural disparity in specialty care access, and to neighborhood deprivation (community measure of socioeconomic status) in liver transplant access, addressing disparities of access will require a multipronged approach at the patient, transplant center, and national level. Herein, we review the current knowledge of these disparities-from variation in larger (regional) to smaller (census tract or zip code) levels to the common etiologies of liver disease, which are particularly affected by these geographic boundaries. The geographic disparity in liver transplant access must balance the limited organ supply with the growing demand. We must identify patient-level factors that contribute to their geographic disparity and incorporate these findings at the transplant center level to develop targeted interventions. We must simultaneously work at the national level to standardize and share patient data (including socioeconomic status and geographic social deprivation indices) to better understand the factors that contribute to the geographic disparity. The complex interplay between organ distribution policy, referral patterns, and variable waitlisting practices with the proportion of high MELD patients and differences in potential donor supply must all be considered to create a national policy strategy to address the inequities in the system.

Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection

The Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases have collaboratively developed evidence-based guidance regarding the diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection since 2013. A panel of clinicians and investigators with extensive infectious diseases or hepatology expertise specific to HCV infection periodically review evidence from the field and update existing recommendations or introduce new recommendations as evidence warrants. This update focuses on changes to the guidance since the previous 2020 published update, including ongoing emphasis on recommended universal screening; management recommendations for incomplete treatment adherence; expanded eligibility for simplified chronic HCV infection treatment in adults with minimal monitoring; updated treatment and retreatment recommendations for children as young as 3 years old; management and treatment recommendations in the transplantation setting; and screening, treatment, and management recommendations for unique and key populations.

Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis Masquerading Acute Rejection in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Donor Liver Graft

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis is a rare complication that manifests in patients receiving organ transplantation from seropositive (hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus) donors. We report a rare case of such a phenomenon in the immediate post-transplant period.

DCD Hepatitis C Virus-positive Donor Livers Can Achieve Favorable Outcomes With Liver Transplantation and Are Underutilized

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors (antibody-positive [Ab + ] or nucleic acid test positive [NAT + ] donors) have been underutilized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization of livers from HCV-positive with donation after circulatory death (DCD) and to assess outcomes in recipients of these grafts.

METHODS

Data between 2015 and 2019 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The utilization rates and graft survival among 8455 DCD liver and nonliver donors and 2278 adult DCD liver transplantation (LT) recipients were reviewed on the basis of donor HCV Ab/NAT status.

RESULTS

The utilization of Ab + /NAT - donors <40 y and Ab + /NAT + donors ≥40 y was low than utilization of HCV-negative donors ( P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified HCV status (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.48 in Ab + /NAT - , and OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-2.05 in Ab + /NAT + ) as an independent predictor of nonutilization of liver grafts. The rate of significant liver fibrosis was comparable in Ab + /NAT - (3.5%; P  = 0.84) but was higher in Ab + /NAT + (8.7%; P  = 0.03) than that in Ab - /NAT - donors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated comparable 3-y patient survival in recipients of HCV-positive grafts compared with recipients of HCV-negative grafts ( P  = 0.63; 85.6% in Ab - /NAT - , 80.4% in Ab + /NAT - , and 88.7% in Ab + /NAT + ).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates are similar between HCV-positive and HCV-negative DCD LT. However, HCV-positive donors are particularly underutilized for DCD LT.

Improving Liver Transplant Outcomes for Hepatitis C Virus Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Era

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has transformed the outcomes of liver transplant (LT) with hepatitis C virus (HCV). This study aimed to analyze the effects of DAA treatment for HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in LT.

METHODS

We included patients confirmed with HCC on explant, analyzed data from United Network for Organ Sharing, and defined the pre-DAA era (2012-2013) and DAA era (2014-2016).

RESULTS

HCV-associated HCC cases totaled 4778 (62%) during the study period. In the DAA era, the median recipient age was older and the median days on the waiting list were longer. For the donor, median age, body mass index, and the rate of HCV significantly increased in the DAA era. In pathology, the median largest tumor size was significantly higher; however, the rate of completed tumor necrosis was significant higher in the DAA era. The 3-year graft/patient survival had significantly improved in the DAA era. In multivariable analysis, the DAA era (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.91) had significantly affected the 3-year graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA has a significant beneficial effect on LT. In the DAA era, graft survival for HCV-associated HCC has been significantly improving.

Special Considerations in the Management of HIV and Viral Hepatitis Coinfections in Liver Transplantation

Modern therapies for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus have become so effective that patients treated for these conditions can have normal life-expectancies. Suitable livers for transplantation remain a scarce and valuable resource. As such, significant efforts have been made to expand donation criteria at many centers. This constant pressure, coupled with the increasing effectiveness of antiviral therapies, has meant that more and more patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be considered appropriate donors in the right circumstances. Patients with these infections are also more likely to be considered appropriate transplantation recipients than in the past. The treatment of HBV, HCV, and HIV after liver transplantation (LT) can be challenging and complicated by viral coinfections. The various pharmaceutical agents used to treat these infections, as well as the immunosuppressants used post-LT must be carefully balanced for maximum efficacy, and to avoid resistance and drug–drug interactions.

The Use of Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Organs in Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Recipients

The use of hepatitis C virus (HCV) -positive organs in HCV-negative recipients with posttransplant antiviral treatment has increasingly been studied since the introduction of new direct-acting antivirals. This article reviews existing experience in liver and kidney transplant. Fifteen studies with 218 HCV D+/R- liver transplants, with 182 from viremic donors, show a sustained viral response for 12 weeks (SVR12) rate of 99.5%. Nine studies involving 204 HCV donor-positive recipient-negative kidney transplant recipients had an SVR12 rate of 99.5%. Complications are infrequent. Preemptive treatment in kidney transplant of for only 4 weeks or even 4 days showed surprising success rates.

Revolution in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus infection in current era

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global public health problem, particularly in developing part of the world. Significant advances have been made in the early diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Its management has been particularly revolutionized during the past two decades. In this review, we summarize the major advances in the diagnostic and management armamentarium for chronic HCV infection. The focus of the present review is on the newer directly acting anti-viral agents, which have revolutionized the management of chronic HCV infection. Management of uncomplicated chronic HCV infection and of specific complications and special at-risk populations of patients will be covered in detail. Despite the advent and approval of highly effective and well tolerable oral agents, still many challenges remain, particularly the affordability, the equitable distribution and access to later drugs. The World Health Organization aims to eliminate viral hepatitis including HCV by 2030 since its poses a major public health threat. There is an urgent need to ensure uniform and early access to diagnostic and therapeutic facilities throughout the world if the later goal has to be realized.

Proposal and validation of a liver graft discard score for liver transplantation from deceased donors: a multicenter Italian study

Several studies have explored the risk of graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT) in recent years. Conversely, risk factors for graft discard before or at procurement have poorly been investigated. The study aimed at identifying a score to predict the risk of liver-related graft discard before transplantation. Secondary aims were to test the score for prediction of biopsy-related negative features and post-LT early graft loss. A total of 4207 donors evaluated during the period January 2004–Decemeber 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The group was split into a training set (n = 3,156; 75.0%) and a validation set (n = 1,051; 25.0%). The Donor Rejected Organ Pre-transplantation (DROP) Score was proposed: − 2.68 + (2.14 if Regional Share) + (0.03*age) + (0.04*weight)-(0.03*height) + (0.29 if diabetes) + (1.65 if anti-HCV-positive) + (0.27 if HBV core) − (0.69 if hypotension) + (0.09*creatinine) + (0.38*log10AST) + (0.34*log10ALT) + (0.06*total bilirubin). At validation, the DROP Score showed the best AUCs for the prediction of liver-related graft discard (0.82; p < 0.001) and macrovesicular steatosis ≥ 30% (0.71; p < 0.001). Patients exceeding the DROP 90th centile had the worse post-LT results (3-month graft loss: 82.8%; log-rank P = 0.024).The DROP score represents a valuable tool to predict the risk of liver function-related graft discard, steatosis, and early post-LT graft survival rates. Studies focused on the validation of this score in other geographical settings are required.

Psychosocial Evaluation in Liver Transplantation for Patients with Alcohol-Related Liver Disease

Content available: Author Interview and Audio Recording.

"Raising HOPE": Improved Outcomes for HIV/HCV-coinfected Liver Transplant Recipients in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era

The 2013 HIV Organ Policy Equity Act has increased liver transplantation (LT) in HIV⁺ patients; however, transplant centers may remain reluctant to perform LT in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients due to inferior outcomes. We aimed to assess how direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have impacted HIV⁺/HCV⁺-coinfected LT recipient outcomes.

Novel treatments for alcoholic hepatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current article aims to review the latest literature on updates in therapeutics for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), integration of treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) into the management of ALD, and the role of liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

ALD has recently become the most common indication for liver transplantation due to the increasing prevalence of AUD and the paucity of therapeutic options. There is broad consensus on the importance of early identification of AUD and the incorporation of its treatment in the management of ALD. New targets for treatment of alcoholic hepatitis include the gut-liver axis, anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidants, and drugs with hepatic regenerative potential. Fecal transplantation in particular has had favorable outcomes at 1 year. n-Acetylcysteine in addition to corticosteroids, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, and IL-22 have also shown improved short-term outcomes. A number of other therapies are being studied in clinical trials and their results are anxiously awaited.

SUMMARY

In summary, there are several promising therapeutic options under clinical investigation for the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis and ALD; however, alcohol abstinence is key. In the absence of other effective therapies, liver transplantation for ALD remains a life-saving treatment with excellent patient and graft survival.

Innovations in liver transplantation in 2020, position of the Belgian Liver Intestine Advisory Committee (BeLIAC)

Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only curative option for patients suffering from end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure and selected hepatocellular carcinomas and access to the LT-waiting list is limited to certain strict indications. However, LT has shown survival advantages for patients in certain indications such as acute alcoholic hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma outside Milan criteria and colorectal cancer metastases. These newer indications increase the pressure in an already difficult context of organ shortage. Strategies to increase the transplantable organ pool are therefore needed. We will discuss here the use of HCV positive grafts as the use of normothermic isolated liver perfusion. Belgian Liver Intestine Advisory Committee (BeLIAC) from the Belgian Transplant Society (BTS) aims to guarantee the balance between the new indications and the available resources.

Hepatitis C viraemic organs in solid organ transplantation

Although rates of organ donation and solid organ transplantation have been increasing over the last few decades, demand for organs still greatly exceeds supply. Several strategies have been utilised to increase organ supply, including utilisation of high-risk (e.g. HCV antibody-positive) donors. In this context, organs from HCV antibody-positive donors have been used in recipients with chronic HCV since the early 1990s. Recently, transplantation of HCV-viraemic organs into HCV-naïve recipients has garnered significant interest, owing to the development of safe and highly effective direct-acting antivirals and increased experience of treating HCV in the post-transplant setting. Preliminary studies based largely in the US have shown excellent outcomes in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation. This practice has the potential to significantly increase transplantation rates and decrease waitlist mortality; however, intentionally transmitting an infectious disease to recipients has important practical and ethical implications. Further, the generalisability of the US experience to other countries is limited by significant differences in HCV-viraemic donor populations. This review summarises the current data on this practice, discusses barriers to implementation, and highlights areas that warrant further study.

Hepatitis C-positive liver transplantation: outcomes and current practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The coincidence of the opioid epidemic and the approval of direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has resulted in an imbalance in HCV viraemic donors relative to HCV viraemic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Although ethical concerns exist about knowingly infecting patients with HCV in the absence of prospective, protocolized studies, transplantation of HCV-positive liver allografts into HCV-negative recipients has increased exponentially in recent years. For this reason, we sought to review outcomes, cost-effectiveness and ethical concerns associated with this practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Short-term outcomes in terms of patient and graft survival are equivalent to those who received HCV-negative allografts without an increase in acute rejection, biliary or vascular complications. Few cases of treatment failure have been reported and complications related to the virus itself such as fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and membranous glomerulonephritis are rare and reversible with prompt direct-acting antiretroviral treatment. The practice appears cost-effective and modelling suggests a survival benefit for patients willing to accept HCV-positive organs compared with those who do not.

SUMMARY

In light of the preponderance of current data, one could argue it is unethical to withhold HCV-positive grafts from HCV-negative recipients who have undergone thorough informed consent.

Practice Habits, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Hepatologists to Alcohol Use Disorder Medication: Sobering Gaps and Opportunities

The prevalence of alcohol use disorder (AUD) and alcohol-associated liver disease is increasing in the United States. Efficacious AUD pharmacotherapies, while available, are, for protean reasons, underutilized. Hepatology providers may be in a position to bridge the pharmacotherapeutic gap between availability and utilization of AUD pharmacotherapies. Our aim was to ascertain the current practice, knowledge and attitudes of hepatology physicians in the United States, and identify opportunities on how to increase AUD medication prescribing.

METHODS

A web-based survey, developed by an expert panel, was administered to hepatology physicians working at all transplant centers in the United States.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 131/658 (20%). There was significant support (two-thirds of respondents) for hepatology providers prescribing AUD medications; however, only 1 in 4 was comfortable prescribing these medications. The majority felt additional education is needed to prescribe AUD medications. The practice of hepatology providers prescribing AUD medications is common, with >50% of respondents having done so. Baclofen was the most popular medication prescribed. Hepatology providers perceived suboptimal ancillary addiction services. Although AUD prescribers had higher rates of AUD pharmacotherapy knowledge compared with nonprescribers, approximately 50% still had inadequate knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

AUD medication prescribing is a common practice among hepatology providers who appear eager to increase this practice through more education as they attempt to bridge the pharmacotherapeutic gap. This informative survey provides guidance for professional societies on how best to disseminate the requisite education required to optimize the care of patients with AUD.