Elevated Bronchoalveolar Lavage Eosinophilia Correlates With Poor Outcome After Lung Transplantation

Relationship between immune cells and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction

A major cause of death for lung transplant recipients (LTRs) is the advent of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which has long plagued the long-term post-transplant prognosis and quality of survival of transplant patients. The intricacy of its pathophysiology and the irreversibility of its illness process present major obstacles to the clinical availability of medications. Immunotherapeutic medications are available, but they only aim to slow down the course of CLAD rather than having any therapeutic impact on the disease's development. For this reason, understanding the pathophysiology of CLAD is essential for both disease prevention and proven treatment. The immunological response in particular, in relation to chronic lung allograft dysfunction, has received a great deal of interest recently. Innate immune cells like natural killer cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, and mononuclear macrophages, as well as adaptive immunity cells like T and B cells, play crucial roles in this process through the release of chemokines and cytokines. The present review delves into changes and processes within the immune microenvironment, with a particular focus on the quantity, subtype, and characteristics of effector immune cells in the peripheral and transplanted lungs after lung transplantation. We incorporate and solidify the documented role of immune cells in the occurrence and development of CLAD with the advancements in recent years.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Clinical Manifestations and Immunologic Mechanisms

The term "chronic lung allograft dysfunction" has emerged to describe the clinical syndrome of progressive, largely irreversible dysfunction of pulmonary allografts. This umbrella term comprises 2 major clinical phenotypes: bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. Here, we discuss the clinical manifestations, diagnostic challenges, and potential therapeutic avenues to address this major barrier to improved long-term outcomes. In addition, we review the immunologic mechanisms thought to propagate each phenotype of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, discuss the various models used to study this process, describe potential therapeutic targets, and identify key unknowns that must be evaluated by future research strategies.

The Immunopathology of Pulmonary Rejection after Murine Lung Transplantation

To improve outcomes following lung transplantation, it is essential to understand the immunological mechanisms that result in chronic graft failure. The associated clinical syndrome is termed chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which is known to be induced by alloimmune-dependent (i.e., rejection) and alloimmune-independent factors (e.g., infections, reflux and environmental factors). We aimed to explore the alloimmune-related mechanism, i.e., pulmonary rejection. In this study, we use a murine orthotopic left lung transplant model using isografts and allografts (C57BL/6 or BALB/c as donors to C57BL/6 recipients), with daily immunosuppression (10 mg/kg cyclosporin A and 1.6 mg/kg methylprednisolone). Serial sacrifice was performed at days 1, 7 and 35 post-transplantation (n = 6 at each time point for each group). Left transplanted lungs were harvested, a single-cell suspension was made and absolute numbers of immune cells were quantified using multicolor flow cytometry. The rejection process followed the principles of a classic immune response, including innate but mainly adaptive immune cells. At day 7 following transplantation, the numbers of interstitial macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, NK cells, NKT cells, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T and B cells were increased in allografts compared with isografts. Only dendritic cells and CD4+ T cells remained elevated at day 35 in allografts. Our study provides insights into the immunological mechanisms of true pulmonary rejection after murine lung transplantation. These results might be important in further research on diagnostic evaluation and treatment for CLAD.

BAL Fluid Eosinophilia Associates With Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction Risk: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death among lung transplant recipients. Eosinophils, effector cells of type 2 immunity, are implicated in the pathobiology of many lung diseases, and prior studies suggest their presence associates with acute rejection or CLAD after lung transplantation.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does histologic allograft injury or respiratory microbiology correlate with the presence of eosinophils in BAL fluid (BALF)? Does early posttransplant BALF eosinophilia associate with future CLAD development, including after adjustment for other known risk factors?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed BALF cell count, microbiology, and biopsy data from a multicenter cohort of 531 lung recipients with 2,592 bronchoscopies over the first posttransplant year. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the correlation of allograft histology or BALF microbiology with the presence of BALF eosinophils. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine the association between ≥ 1% BALF eosinophils in the first posttransplant year and definite CLAD. Expression of eosinophil-relevant genes was quantified in CLAD and transplant control tissues.

RESULTS

The odds of BALF eosinophils being present was significantly higher at the time of acute rejection and nonrejection lung injury histologies and during pulmonary fungal detection. Early posttransplant ≥ 1% BALF eosinophils significantly and independently increased the risk for definite CLAD development (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.04; P = .009). Tissue expression of eotaxins, IL-13-related genes, and the epithelial-derived cytokines IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphoprotein were significantly increased in CLAD.

INTERPRETATION

BALF eosinophilia was an independent predictor of future CLAD risk across a multicenter lung recipient cohort. Additionally, type 2 inflammatory signals were induced in established CLAD. These data underscore the need for mechanistic and clinical studies to clarify the role of type 2 pathway-specific interventions in CLAD prevention or treatment.

Eosinophilic Lung Diseases

The eosinophilic lung diseases may manifest as chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, or as the Löffler syndrome (generally of parasitic etiology). The diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia is made when both characteristic clinical-imaging features and alveolar eosinophilia are present. Peripheral blood eosinophils are generally markedly elevated; however, eosinophilia may be absent at presentation. Lung biopsy is not indicated except in atypical cases after multidisciplinary discussion. The inquiry to possible causes (medications, toxic drugs, exposures, and infections especially parasitic) must be meticulous. Idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia may be misdiagnosed as infectious pneumonia. Extrathoracic manifestations raise the suspicion of a systemic disease especially eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Airflow obstruction is frequent in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and hypereosinophilic obliterative bronchiolitis. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy, but relapses are common. Therapies targeting interleukin 5/interleukin-5 are increasingly used in eosinophilic lung diseases.

[Chronic lung allograft dysfunction in 2022, past and updates]

INTRODUCTION

While short-term results of lung transplantation have improved considerably, long-term survival remains below that achieved for other solid organ transplants.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE

The main cause of late mortality is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which affects nearly half of the recipients 5 years after transplantation. Immunological and non-immune risk factors have been identified. These factors activate the innate and adaptive immune system, leading to lesional and altered wound-healing processes, which result in fibrosis affecting the small airways or interstitial tissue. Several phenotypes of CLAD have been identified based on respiratory function and imaging pattern. Aside from retransplantation, which is possible for only small number of patients, no treatment can reverse the CLAD process.

PERSPECTIVES

Current therapeutic research is focused on anti-fibrotic treatments and photopheresis. Basic research has identified numerous biomarkers that could prove to be relevant as therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION

While the pathophysiological mechanisms of CLAD are better understood than before, a major therapeutic challenge remains.

Biomarkers for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Ready for Prime Time?

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major hurdle impairing lung transplant outcome. Parallel to the better clinical identification and characterization of CLAD and CLAD phenotypes, there is an increasing urge to find adequate biomarkers that could assist in the earlier detection and differential diagnosis of CLAD phenotypes, as well as disease prognostication. The current status and state-of-the-art of biomarker research in CLAD will be discussed with a particular focus on radiological biomarkers or biomarkers found in peripheral tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage' and circulating blood' in which significant progress has been made over the last years. Ultimately, although a growing number of biomarkers are currently being embedded in the follow-up of lung transplant patients, it is clear that one size does not fit all. The future of biomarker research probably lies in the rigorous combination of clinical information with findings in tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage' or blood. Only by doing so, the ultimate goal of biomarker research can be achieved, which is the earlier identification of CLAD before its clinical manifestation. This is desperately needed to improve the prognosis of patients with CLAD after lung transplantation.

Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle

Lung transplantation is the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage chronic lung diseases. However, chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains the leading obstacle to improved long-term outcomes. Traditionally, lung allograft rejection has been considered primarily as a manifestation of cellular immune responses. However, in reality, an array of complex, interacting and multifactorial mechanisms contribute to its emergence. Alloimmune-dependent mechanisms, including T-cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, as well as non-alloimmune injuries, have been implicated. Moreover, a role has emerged for autoimmune responses to lung self-antigens in the development of chronic graft injury. The aim of this review is to summarise the immune processes involved in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, with advanced insights into the role of innate immune pathways and crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity, and to identify gaps in current knowledge.

Markers of rejection of a lung allograft: state of the art

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) affects approximately 50% of all lung transplant recipients by 5 post-operative years and is the leading cause of death in lung transplant recipients. Early CLAD diagnosis or ideally prediction of CLAD is essential to enable early intervention before significant lung injury occurs. New technologies have emerged to facilitate biomarker discovery, including epigenetic modification and single-cell RNA sequencing. This review examines new and existing technologies for biomarker discovery and the current state of research on biomarkers for identifying lung transplant rejection.

Inflammation on bronchoalveolar lavage cytology is associated with decreased chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant recipients undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to detect antecedents of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), but routine assessment of BAL cytology is controversial. We hypothesized that inflammation on BAL cytology would predict CLAD-free survival.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective cohort, associations between cytology results and clinical characteristics were compared using generalized-estimating equation-adjusted regression. The association between BAL inflammation and CLAD or death risk was assessed using time-dependent Cox models.

RESULTS

 In 3,365 cytology reports from 451 subjects, inflammation was the most common finding (6.2%, 210 cases), followed by fungal forms (5.3%, 178 cases, including 24 cases of suspected Aspergillus). Inflammation on BAL cytology was more common in procedures for symptoms (8.5%) versus surveillance (3.2%, P<0.001). Inflammation on cytology was associated with automated neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, acute cellular rejection, infection, and portended a 2.2-fold hazard ratio (CI 1.2-4.0, P = 0.007) for CLAD or death. However, inflammation by cytology did not inform CLAD-free survival risk beyond automated BAL cell counts (P = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation on BAL cytology is clinically significant, suggesting acute rejection or infection and increased risk of CLAD or death. However, other indicators of allograft inflammation can substitute for much of the information provided by BAL cytology. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effector immune cells in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: a Systematic Review

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the major barrier to long‐term survival after lung transplantation and improved insight into its underlying immunological mechanisms is critical to better understand the disease and to identify treatment targets. We systematically searched the electronic databases of PubMed and EMBASE for original research publications, published between January 2000 and April 2021, to comprehensively assess current evidence on effector immune cells in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from lung transplant recipients with CLAD. Literature search revealed 1351 articles, 76 of which met the criteria for inclusion in our analysis. Our results illustrate significant complexity in both innate and adaptive immune cell responses in CLAD, along with presence of numerous immune cell products, including cytokines, chemokines and proteases associated with tissue remodelling. A clear link between neutrophils and eosinophils and CLAD incidence has been seen, in which eosinophils more specifically predisposed to restrictive allograft syndrome. The presence of cytotoxic and T‐helper cells in CLAD pathogenesis is well‐documented, although it is challenging to draw conclusions about their role in tissue processes from predominantly bronchoalveolar lavage data. In restrictive allograft syndrome, a more prominent humoral immune involvement with increased B cells, immunoglobulins and complement deposition is seen. Our evaluation of published studies over the last 20 years summarizes the complex multifactorial immunopathology of CLAD onset and progression. It highlights the phenotype of several key effector immune cells involved in CLAD pathogenesis, as well as the paucity of single cell resolution spatial studies in lung tissue from patients with CLAD.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Restrictive allograft syndrome after lung transplantation

Despite recent advances over the past decade in lung transplantation including improved surgical technique and immunotherapy, the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains a significant barrier to recipient survival. Aside from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, a restrictive phenotype called restrictive allograft syndrome has recently been recognized and affects up to 35% of all patients with CLAD. The main characteristics of RAS include a persistent and unexplained decline in lung function compared to baseline and persistent parenchymal infiltrates on imaging. The median survival after diagnosis of RAS is 6 to 18 months, significantly shorter than other forms of CLAD. Treatment options are limited, as therapies used for BOS are typically ineffective at halting disease progression. Specific medications such as fibrinolytics are lacking large, multicenter prospective studies. In this manuscript, we discuss the definition, mechanism, and characteristics of RAS while highlighting the similarities and differences between other forms of CLAD. We also review the diagnoses along with current and potential treatment options that are available for patients. Finally, we discuss the existing knowledge gaps and areas for future research to improve patient outcomes and understanding of RAS.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Review of CT and Pathologic Findings

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the most common cause of mortality in lung transplant recipients after the 1st year of transplantation. CLAD has traditionally been classified into two distinct obstructive and restrictive forms: bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. However, CLAD may manifest with a spectrum of imaging and pathologic findings and a combination of obstructive and restrictive physiologic abnormalities. Although the initial CT manifestations of CLAD may be nonspecific, the progression of findings at follow-up should signal the possibility of CLAD and may be present on imaging studies prior to the development of functional abnormalities of the lung allograft. This review encompasses the evolution of CT findings in CLAD, with emphasis on the underlying pathogenesis and pathologic condition, to enhance understanding of imaging findings. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the radiologist with the initial and follow-up CT findings of the obstructive, restrictive, and mixed forms of CLAD, for which early diagnosis and treatment may result in improved survival. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Peripheral Blood Eosinophilia Is Associated with Poor Outcome Post-Lung Transplantation

Eosinophils play a role in many chronic lung diseases. In lung transplantation (LTx), increased eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was associated with worse outcomes. However, the effect of peripheral blood eosinophilia after LTx has not been investigated thoroughly. A retrospective study was performed including all LTx patients between 2011-2016. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free and graft survival were compared between patients with high and low blood eosinophils using an 8% threshold ever during follow-up. A total of 102 patients (27.1%) had high blood eosinophils (≥8%) (45 before CLAD and 17 after, 40 had no CLAD) and 274 (72.9%) had low eosinophils (<8%). Patients with high blood eosinophils demonstrated worse graft survival (p = 0.0001) and CLAD-free survival (p = 0.003) compared to low eosinophils. Patients with both high blood and high BAL (≥2%) eosinophils ever during follow-up had the worst outcomes. Within the high blood eosinophil group, 23.5% had RAS compared to 3% in the group with low eosinophils (p < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis, the association between high blood eosinophils and graft and CLAD-free survival remained significant (p = 0.036, p = 0.013) independent of high BAL eosinophils and infection at peak blood eosinophilia, among others. LTx recipients with ever ≥8% blood eosinophils demonstrate inferior graft and CLAD-free survival, specifically RAS, which requires further prospective research.

Eosinophils in transbronchial biopsies: a predictor of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and reduced survival after lung transplantation - a retrospective single-center cohort study

Long-term outcomes after lung transplantation remain inferior to those of other solid organ groups. The significance of eosinophils detected on transbronchial biopsies (TBBx) after lung transplantation and their relationship to long-term outcomes remain unknown. A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed of patients transplanted between January 01, 2001, and July 31, 2018, who had at least 1 TBBx with evaluable parenchymal tissue. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the associations between eosinophil detection and: all-cause mortality and Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD). 8887 TBBx reports from 1440 patients were reviewed for the mention of eosinophils in the pathology report. 112 (7.8%) patients were identified with eosinophils on at least one TBBx. The median (95% CI) survival time for all patients was 8.28 (7.32-9.31) years. Multivariable analysis, adjusted for clinical variables known to affect post-transplant outcomes, showed that the detection of eosinophils was independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.24-1.85, p < 0.01) and CLAD (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.70, P = 0.01). Eosinophils detected in TBBx are associated with an increased risk of CLAD and death. There may be benefit in specifically reporting the presence of eosinophils in TBBx reports and incorporating their presence in clinical decision-making.

Surveillance Bronchoscopy for the Care of Lung Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation is often the only treatment for end-stage lung disease. Following lung transplantation, infections and transplant rejections are major obstacles to short- and long-term success. Therefore, close monitoring for these complications is required after lung transplantation. The role of prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies after lung transplantation is controversial. Thus, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the therapeutic implications of surveillance bronchoscopies in 110 consecutive lung transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of 400 prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies of 110 consecutive lung transplant recipients were analyzed. Positive results (pathologic histology, microbiology, or virology) were further investigated for their effect on clinical decision making. Additionally, cellular composition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred five surveillance bronchoscopies showed pathologic findings. In 81 cases clinical treatment was changed based on the results. That is, 20% of all prescheduled bronchoscopies directly influenced clinical decision making. Furthermore, analyses of BAL indicate that increased alveolar eosinophils are associated with an increased risk of transplant rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies identify clinically unsuspected but therapeutically relevant pathologic findings in approximately 20% of cases. BAL cell composition may confer additional information, especially in cases when biopsy is not possible.

Late-onset "acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia" impairs long-term lung allograft function and survival

Acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia (AFOP) after lung transplantation is associated with a rapid decline in pulmonary function. However, the relation with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains unclear. We investigated the association between detection of AFOP in lung allograft biopsies with clinically important endpoints.We reviewed lung allograft biopsies from 468 patients who underwent lung transplantation at the University Hospitals Leuven (2011-2017). AFOP was categorised as early new-onset (≤90 days post-transplant) or late new-onset (>90 days post-transplant); and associated with CLAD-free survival, graft survival, donor-specific antibodies, airway and blood eosinophilia.Early and late AFOP was detected in 24 (5%) and 30 (6%) patients, respectively. CLAD-free survival was significantly lower in patients with late AFOP (median survival 2.42 years; p<0.0001) compared with patients with early or without AFOP and specifically associated with development of restrictive allograft syndrome (OR 28.57, 95% CI 11.34-67.88; p<0.0001). Similarly, graft survival was significantly lower in patients with late AFOP (median survival 4.39 years; p<0.0001) compared with patients with early AFOP or without AFOP. Late AFOP was furthermore associated with detection of circulating donor-specific antibodies (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.17-10.60; p=0.0004) compared with patients with early or without AFOP, and elevated airway and blood eosinophilia (p=0.043 and p=0.045, respectively) compared with early AFOP patients.Late new-onset AFOP is associated with a worse prognosis and high risk of CLAD development, specifically restrictive allograft syndrome. Our findings indicate that late new-onset AFOP might play a role in the early pathogenesis of restrictive allograft syndrome.

An official JRS statement: The principles of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement and interpretation of the results in clinical practice

Nitric oxide (NO) is produced in the body and has been shown to have diverse actions in the abundance of research that has been performed on it since the 1970s, leading to Furchgott, Murad, and Ignarro receiving the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1998. NO is produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NOS is broadly distributed, being found in the nerves, blood vessels, airway epithelium, and inflammatory cells. In asthma, inflammatory cytokines induce NOS activity in the airway epithelium and inflammatory cells, producing large amounts of NO. Measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a simple, safe, and quantitative method of assessing airway inflammation. The FeNO measurement method has been standardized and, in recent years, this noninvasive test has been broadly used to support the diagnosis of asthma, monitor airway inflammation, and detect asthma overlap in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Since the normal upper limit of FeNO for healthy Japanese adults is 37 ppb, values of 35 ppb or more are likely to be interpreted as a signature of inflammatory condition presenting features with asthma, and this value is used in clinical practice. Research is also underway for clinical application of these measurements in other respiratory diseases such as COPD and interstitial lung disease. Currently, there remains some confusion regarding the significance of these measurements and the interpretation of the results. This statement is designed to provide a simple explanation including the principles of FeNO measurements, the measurement methods, and the interpretation of the measurement results.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement for the standardization of bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplantation

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a key clinical and research tool in lung transplantation (LTx). However, BAL collection and processing are not standardized across LTx centers. This International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation-supported consensus document on BAL standardization aims to clarify definitions and propose common approaches to improve clinical and research practice standards. The following 9 areas are covered: (1) bronchoscopy procedure and BAL collection, (2) sample handling, (3) sample processing for microbiology, (4) cytology, (5) research, (6) microbiome, (7) sample inventory/tracking, (8) donor bronchoscopy, and (9) pediatric considerations. This consensus document aims to harmonize clinical and research practices for BAL collection and processing in LTx. The overarching goal is to enhance standardization and multicenter collaboration within the international LTx community and enable improvement and development of new BAL-based diagnostics.

Deciphering the role of eosinophils in solid organ transplantation

Eosinophils are rare granulocytes that belong to the innate arm of the immune system. This cell population is traditionally defined as a destructive and cytotoxic mediator in asthma and helminth infection. Limited data in transplantation have suggested that eosinophils play a similar role in potentiating deleterious organ inflammation and immunologic rejection. Contrary to this long-held notion, recent data have uncovered the possibility that eosinophils play an alternative role in immune homeostasis, defense against a wide range of pathogens, as well as downregulation of deleterious inflammation. Specifically, translational data from small animal models of lung transplantation have demonstrated a critical role for eosinophils in the downregulation of alloimmunity. These findings shed new light on the unique immunologic features of the lung allograft and demonstrate that environmental polarization may alter the phenotype and function of leukocyte populations previously thought to be static in nature. In this review, we provide an update on eosinophils in the homeostasis of the lung as well as other solid organs.

Emerging biomarkers in chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Introduction: Lung transplantation remains an important treatment for patients with end stage lung disease. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the greatest limiting factor for long term survival. As the diagnosis of CLAD is based on pulmonary function tests, significant lung injury is required before a diagnosis is feasible, likely when irreversible damage has already occurred. Therefore, research is ongoing for early CLAD recognition, with biomarkers making up a substantial amount of this research.Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to describe available biomarkers, focusing on those which aid in predicting CLAD and distinguishing between different CLAD phenotypes. We describe biomarkers presenting in bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) as well as circulating in peripheral blood, both of which offer an appealing alternative to lung biopsy.Expert opinion: Development of CLAD involves complex, multiple immune and nonimmune mechanisms. Therefore, evaluation of potential CLAD biomarkers serves a dual purpose: clinically, the goal remains early detection and identification of patients at increased risk. Simultaneously, biomarkers offer insight into the different mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of CLAD, leading to the development of possible interventions. The ultimate goal is the development of both preventive and early intervention strategies for CLAD to improve the overall survival of our lung transplant recipients.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome after lung transplantation: why are there two distinct forms of chronic lung allograft dysfunction?

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) had been considered to be the representative form of chronic rejection or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation. In BOS, small airways are affected by chronic inflammation and obliterative fibrosis, whereas peripheral lung tissue remains relatively intact. However, recognition of another form of CLAD involving multiple tissue compartments in the lung, termed restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS), raised a fundamental question: why there are two phenotypes of CLAD? Increasing clinical and experimental data suggest that RAS may be a prototype of chronic rejection after lung transplantation involving both cellular and antibody-mediated alloimmune responses. Some cases of RAS are also induced by fulminant general inflammation in lung allografts. However, BOS involves alloimmune responses and the airway-centered disease process can be explained by multiple mechanisms such as external alloimmune-independent stimuli (such as infection, aspiration and air pollution), exposure of airway-specific autoantigens and airway ischemia. Localization of immune responses in different anatomical compartments in different phenotypes of CLAD might be associated with lymphoid neogenesis or the de novo formation of lymphoid tissue in lung allografts. Better understanding of distinct mechanisms of BOS and RAS will facilitate the development of effective preventive and therapeutic strategies of CLAD.

Using Bronchoalveolar Lavage to Evaluate Changes in Pulmonary Diseases

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a procedure that can be used to collect samples from human and animal lungs to efficiently evaluate the immune response and the potentially pathological changes by examining both the compositions of cells and fluid from lavage. There are observable changes including inflammatory response in human and animal lungs exposed to environmental exposures such as toxic chemicals and microorganisms, or under pathophysiological conditions in respiratory system. The profile of inflammatory cells in BAL provides a qualitative description of inflammatory response, and the secretion in BAL fluid contains secreted proteins of inflammatory mediators and albumin as a quantitative measurement of inflammation and tissue injury in the lungs. Mouse is the most common model system being used for pulmonary disease-related research. A consistent experimental approach on how to lavage mouse lungs and collect samples from mouse lungs is important for a reproducible evaluation of pathological and physiological changes in mouse lung especially for the analysis of inflammation.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome-free survival after lung transplantation: An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Transplant Registry analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients have low long-term survival and a high incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). However, few long-term, multicenter, and precise estimates of BOS-free survival (a composite outcome of death or BOS) incidence exist.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of primary LTx recipients (1994-2011) reported to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Transplant Registry assessed outcomes through 2012. For the composite primary outcome of BOS-free survival, we used Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression, censoring for loss to follow-up, end of study, and re-LTx. Although standard Thoracic Transplant Registry analyses censor at the last consecutive annual complete BOS status report, our analyses allowed for partially missing BOS data.

RESULTS

Due to BOS reporting standards, 99.1% of the cohort received LTx in North America. During 79,896 person-years of follow-up, single LTx (6,599 of 15,268 [43%]) and bilateral LTx (8,699 of 15,268 [57%]) recipients had a median BOS-free survival of 3.16 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-3.30 years) and 3.58 years (95% CI, 3.53-3.72 years), respectively. Almost 90% of the single and bilateral LTx recipients developed the composite outcome within 10 years of transplantation. Standard Registry analyses "overestimated" median BOS-free survival by 0.42 years and "underestimated" the median survival after BOS by about a half-year for both single and bilateral LTx (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most LTx recipients die or develop BOS within 4 years, and very few remain alive and free from BOS at 10 years post-LTx. Less inclusive Thoracic Transplant Registry analytic methods tend to overestimate BOS-free survival. The Registry would benefit from improved international reporting of BOS and other chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) events.

Update in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major limitation to posttransplant survival. This review highlights the evolving definition of CLAD, risk factors, treatment, and expected outcomes after the development of CLAD.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction phenotypes and treatment

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major hurdle limiting long-term survival post lung transplantation. Given the clinical heterogeneity of CLAD, recently two phenotypes of CLAD have been defined [bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) vs. restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) or restrictive CLAD (rCLAD)]. BOS is characterized by an obstructive pulmonary function, air trapping on CT and obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) on histopathology, while RAS/rCLAD patients show a restrictive pulmonary function, persistent pleuro-parenchymal infiltrates on CT and pleuroparenchymal fibro-elastosis on biopsies. Importantly, the patients with RAS/rCLAD have a severely limited survival post diagnosis of 6-18 months compared to 3-5 years after BOS diagnosis. In this review, we will review historical evidence for this heterogeneity and we will highlight the clinical, radiological, histopathological characteristics of both phenotypes, as well as their risk factors. Treatment of CLAD remains troublesome, nevertheless, we will give an overview of different treatment strategies that have been tried with some success. Adequate phenotyping remains difficult but is clearly needed for both clinical and scientific purposes.

"White-Out" After Lung Transplantation: A Multicenter Cohort Description of Late Acute Graft Failure

Graft failure represents a leading cause of mortality after organ transplantation. Acute late-onset graft failure has not been widely reported. The authors describe the demographics, CT imaging-pathology findings, and treatment of patients presenting with the latter. A retrospective review was performed of lung transplant recipients at two large-volume centers. Acute late-onset graft failure was defined as sudden onset of bilateral infiltrates with an oxygenation index <200 without identifiable cause or concurrent extrapulmonary organ failure. Laboratory, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), radiology, and histology results were assessed. Between 2005 and 2016, 21 patients were identified. Median survival was 19 (IQR 13-36) days post onset. Twelve patients (57%) required intensive care support at onset, 12 (57%) required mechanical ventilation, and 6 (29%) were placed on extracorporeal life support. Blood and BAL analysis revealed elevated neutrophilia, with CT demonstrating diffuse ground-glass opacities. Transbronchial biopsy samples revealed acute fibrinoid organizing pneumonia (AFOP), organizing pneumonia, and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). Assessment of explanted lungs confirmed AFOP and DAD but also identified obliterative bronchiolitis. Patients surviving to discharge without redo transplantation (n = 2) subsequently developed restrictive allograft syndrome. This study describes acute late-onset graft failure in lung allograft recipients, without known cause, which is associated with a dismal prognosis.

Eosinophilic Lung Disease

Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of a number of lung diseases. Recent advances in eosinophil biology have now produced clinically applicable therapies that seek to counter eosinophilia in blood and lungs. This article reviews the basic biology of eosinophils and their role in mediating T-helper 2 cell responses. The current status of anticytokine therapy for eosinophilic lung disease is discussed. A clinical approach to eosinophilic lung disease based on symptoms and radiography is generated. The clinical significance of persistent eosinophilia in lung transplant patients and patients with asthma will receive special emphasis.

Immunological diversity in phenotypes of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: a comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis

Chronic rejection after organ transplantation is defined as a humoral- and cell-mediated immune response directed against the allograft. In lung transplantation, chronic rejection is nowadays clinically defined as a cause of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), consisting of different clinical phenotypes including restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). However, the differential role of humoral and cellular immunity is not investigated up to now. Explant lungs of patients with end-stage BOS (n = 19) and RAS (n = 18) were assessed for the presence of lymphoid (B and T cells) and myeloid cells (dendritic cells, eosinophils, mast cells, neutrophils, and macrophages) and compared to nontransplant control lung biopsies (n = 21). All myeloid cells, with exception of dendritic cells, were increased in RAS versus control (neutrophils, eosinophils, and mast cells: all P < 0.05, macrophages: P < 0.001). Regarding lymphoid cells, B cells and cytotoxic T cells were increased remarkably in RAS versus control (P < 0.001) and in BOS versus control (P < 0.01). Interestingly, lymphoid follicles were restricted to RAS (P < 0.001 versus control and P < 0.05 versus BOS). Our data suggest an immunological diversity between BOS and RAS, with a more pronounced involvement of the B-cell response in RAS characterized by a structural organization of lymphoid follicles. This may impact future therapeutic approaches.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells are Readily Recoverable from Lung Tissue, but not the Alveolar Space, in Healthy Humans

Stromal support is critical for lung homeostasis and the maintenance of an effective epithelial barrier. Despite this, previous studies have found a positive association between the number of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) isolated from the alveolar compartment and human lung diseases associated with epithelial dysfunction. We hypothesised that bronchoalveolar lavage derived MSCs (BAL-MSCs) are dysfunctional and distinct from resident lung tissue MSCs (LT-MSCs). In this study, we comprehensively interrogated the phenotype and transcriptome of human BAL-MSCs and LT-MSCs. We found that MSCs were rarely recoverable from the alveolar space in healthy humans, but could be readily isolated from lung transplant recipients by bronchoalveolar lavage. BAL-MSCs exhibited a CD90^Hi , CD73^Hi , CD45^Neg , CD105^Lo immunophenotype and were bipotent, lacking adipogenic potential. In contrast, MSCs were readily recoverable from healthy human lung tissue and were CD90^{Hi or Lo} , CD73^Hi , CD45^Neg , CD105^Int and had full tri-lineage potential. Transcriptional profiling of the two populations confirmed their status as bona fide MSCs and revealed a high degree of similarity between each other and the archetypal bone-marrow MSC. 105 genes were differentially expressed; 76 of which were increased in BAL-MSCs including genes involved in fibroblast activation, extracellular matrix deposition and tissue remodelling. Finally, we found the fibroblast markers collagen 1A1 and α-smooth muscle actin were increased in BAL-MSCs. Our data suggests that in healthy humans, lung MSCs reside within the tissue, but in disease can differentiate to acquire a profibrotic phenotype and migrate from their in-tissue niche into the alveolar space. Stem Cells 2016;34:2548-2558.

Eosinophilic Lung Diseases

Eosinophilic lung diseases especially comprise eosinophilic pneumonia or as the more transient Löffler syndrome, which is most often due to parasitic infections. The diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia is based on characteristic clinical-imaging features and the demonstration of alveolar eosinophilia, defined as at least 25% eosinophils at BAL. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is common but may be absent at presentation in idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia, which may be misdiagnosed as severe infectious pneumonia. All possible causes of eosinophilia, including drug, toxin, fungus related etiologies, must be thoroughly investigated. Extrathoracic manifestations should raise the suspicion of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Diagnostic value of plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in acute lung allograft rejection: differential cytology

Diagnosis of acute lung allograft rejection is currently based on transbronchial lung biopsies. Additional methods to detect acute allograft dysfunction derived from plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage samples might facilitate diagnosis and ultimately improve allograft survival. This review article gives an overview of the cell profiles of bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma samples during acute lung allograft rejection. The value of these cells and changes within the pattern of differential cytology to support the diagnosis of acute lung allograft rejection is discussed. Current findings on the topic are highlighted and trends for future research are identified.

Predictors of survival in restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the main factor limiting long-term survival after lung transplantation. Besides bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, a restrictive phenotype of CLAD (rCLAD) exists, which is associated with poor prognosis after diagnosis. However, survival determinants for rCLAD remain to be elucidated. Our aim in this study was to establish parameters predicting survival in patients with rCLAD.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with rCLAD in 2 lung transplant centers were assessed in a retrospective manner. Various clinical parameters [demography, pulmonary function, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), histopathology, radiology and blood differentials] at rCLAD diagnosis were correlated with graft survival using unadjusted and adjusted analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients with rCLAD were included with a median graft survival after diagnosis of 1.1 years. Univariate analysis demonstrated that lower-lobe-dominant or diffuse infiltrates on chest computed tomography, presence of an identifiable trigger before rCLAD onset, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, increased BAL neutrophilia, increased BAL eosinophilia and increased blood eosinophils were associated with inferior graft survival after rCLAD diagnosis. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association of location of infiltrates and blood eosinophilia on graft survival.

CONCLUSION

In this study we have identified parameters associated with graft survival after rCLAD diagnosis that may be useful to predict prognosis.

Lung Transplantation

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disorders are currently limited. Lung transplantation remains one of the few viable interventions, but on account of the insufficient donor pool only a minority of these patients actually undergo the procedure each year. Following transplantation there are a number of early and late allograft complications such as primary graft dysfunction, allograft rejection, infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and late injury that is now classified as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The pathologist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and classification of these myriad complications. Although the transplant procedures are performed in selected centers patients typically return to their local centers. When complications arise it is often the responsibility of the local pathologist to evaluate specimens. Therefore familiarity with the pathology of lung transplantation is important.

Application of nitric oxide measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a convenient, non-invasive method for the assessment of active, mainly Th2-driven, airway inflammation, which is sensitive to treatment with standard anti-inflammatory therapy. Consequently, FeNO serves as a valued tool to aid diagnosis and monitoring in several asthma phenotypes. More recently, FeNO has been evaluated in several other respiratory, infectious, and/or immunological conditions. In this short review, we provide an overview of several clinical studies and discuss the status of potential applications of NO measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma.

Low-dose computed tomography volumetry for subtyping chronic lung allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The long-term success of lung transplantation is challenged by the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and its distinct subtypes of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). However, the current diagnostic criteria for CLAD subtypes rely on total lung capacity (TLC), which is not always measured during routine post-transplant assessment. Our aim was to investigate the utility of low-dose 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) lung volumetry for differentiating RAS from BOS.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective evaluation of 63 patients who had developed CLAD after bilateral lung or heart‒lung transplantation between 2006 and 2011, including 44 BOS and 19 RAS cases. Median post-transplant follow-up was 65 months in BOS and 27 months in RAS. The median interval between baseline and the disease-onset time-point for CT volumetry was 11 months in both BOS and RAS. Chronologic changes and diagnostic accuracy of CT lung volume (measured as percent of baseline) were investigated.

RESULTS

RAS showed a significant decrease in CT lung volume at disease onset compared with baseline (mean 3,916 ml vs 3,055 ml when excluding opacities, p < 0.0001), whereas BOS showed no significant post-transplant change (mean 4,318 ml vs 4,396 ml, p = 0.214). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of CT lung volume for differentiating RAS from BOS was 0.959 (95% confidence interval 0.912 to 1.01, p < 0.0001) and the calculated accuracy was 0.938 at a threshold of 85%.

CONCLUSION

In bilateral lung or heart‒lung transplant patients with CLAD, low-dose CT volumetry is a useful tool to differentiate patients who develop RAS from those who develop BOS.

Impact of CLAD Phenotype on Survival After Lung Retransplantation: A Multicenter Study

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major problem after lung transplantation with no definitive treatment except redo lung transplantation (re-LTx) in selected candidates. However, CLAD is not a homogeneous entity and different phenotypes exist. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of CLAD phenotypes on survival after re-LTx for CLAD. Patients who underwent re-LTx for respiratory failure secondary to CLAD in four LTx centers between 2003 and 2013 were included in this retrospective analysis. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive CLAD (rCLAD) were distinguished using pulmonary function, radiology and explant lung histopathology. Patient variables pre- and post-re-LTx were collected and analyzed. A total of 143 patients underwent re-LTx for CLAD resulting in 94 BOS (66%) and 49 rCLAD (34%) patients. Unadjusted and adjusted survival after re-LTx for rCLAD was worse compared to BOS (HR = 2.60, 1.59-4.24; p < 0.0001 and HR = 2.61, 1.51-4.51; p = 0.0006, respectively). Patients waiting at home prior to re-LTx experienced better survival compared to hospitalized patients (HR 0.40; 0.23-0.72; p = 0.0022). Patients with rCLAD redeveloped CLAD earlier and were more likely to redevelop rCLAD. Survival after re-LTx for rCLAD is worse compared to BOS. Consequently, re-LTx for rCLAD should be critically discussed, particularly when additional peri-operative risk factors are present.

Migratory eosinophilic alveolitis caused by radiation therapy

Although radiation pneumonitis is usually confined to irradiated areas, some studies have reported that radiation-induced lymphocytic alveolitis can also spread to the non-irradiated lung. However, there have been few reports of radiation-induced eosinophilic alveolitis. We report the case of a 27-year-old female with radiation pneumonitis, occurring 4 months after radiation therapy for cancer of the left breast. Clinical and radiological relapse followed withdrawal of corticosteroids. Examination of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in patchy airspace consolidations revealed increased eosinophil counts. Finally, clinical and radiological signs resolved rapidly after reintroduction of corticosteroids. Eosinophilic alveolitis may be promoted by radiation therapy. In the present case report, possible mechanisms for radiation-induced eosinophilic alveolitis are also reviewed.

Current views on chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was recently introduced as an overarching term mainly to classify patients with chronic rejection after lung transplantation, although other conditions may also qualify for CLAD. Initially, only the development of a persistent and obstructive pulmonary function defect, clinically identified as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), was considered as chronic rejection, if no other cause could be identified. It became clear in recent years that some patients do not qualify for this definition, although they developed a chronic and persistent decrease in FEV1 , without another identifiable cause. As the pulmonary function decline in these patients was rather restrictive, this was called restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). In the present review, we will further elaborate on these two CLAD phenotypes, with specific attention to the diagnostic criteria, the role of pathology and imaging, the risk factors, outcome, and the possible treatment options.

Eosinophilic Pneumonia

Eosinophilic pneumonia may manifest as chronic or transient infiltrates with mild symptoms, chronic idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia, or the frequently severe acute eosinophilic pneumonia that may be secondary to a variety of causes (drug intake, new onset of tobacco smoking, infection) and that may necessitate mechanical ventilation. When present, blood eosinophilia greater than 1 × 10⁹ eosinophils/L (and preferably greater than 1.5 × 10⁹/L) is of considerable help for suggesting the diagnosis, however it may be absent, as in the early phase of idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia or when patients are already taking corticosteroids. On bronchoalveolar lavage, high eosinophilia (>25 %, and preferably >40 % of differential cell count) is considered diagnostic of eosinophilic pneumonia in a compatible setting, obviating the need of video-assisted thoracic surgical lung biopsy, which is now performed only on very rare occasions with inconsistency between clinical, biological, and imaging features. Inquiry as to drug intake must be meticulous (www.pneumotox.com) and any suspected drug should be withdrawn. Laboratory investigations for parasitic causes must take into account the travel history or residence and the epidemiology of parasites. In patients with associated extrathoracic manifestations, the diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis or of the hypereosinophilic syndromes should be raised. Presence of airflow obstruction can be found in hypereosinophilic asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, or in the recently identified syndrome of hyperosinophilic obliterative bronchiolitis. Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of symptomatic treatment for eosinophilic pneumonias, with a generally dramatic response. Relapses are common when tapering the doses or after stopping treatment especially in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. Cyclophosphamide is necessary only in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and poor-prognostic factors. Imatinib is very effective in the treatment of the myeloproliferative variant of hypereosinophilic syndromes. Anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibodies are promising in the spectrum of eosinophilic disorders.

Restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Where are we now?

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a frequent and troublesome complication after lung transplantation. Apart from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a restrictive phenotype of CLAD (rCLAD) has recently been recognized, which occurs in approximately 30% of CLAD patients. The main characteristics of rCLAD include a restrictive pulmonary function pattern with a persistent decline in lung function (FEV1, FVC and TLC), persistent parenchymal infiltrates and (sub)pleural thickening on chest CT scan, as well as pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis and obliterative bronchiolitis on histopathologic examination. Once diagnosed, median survival is only 6 to 18 months compared with 3 to 5 years with BOS. In this perspective we review the historic evidence for rCLAD and describe the different diagnostic criteria and prognosis. Furthermore, we elaborate on the typical radiologic and histopathologic presentations of rCLAD and highlight risk factors and mechanisms. Last, we summarize some opportunities for further research including the urgent need for adequate therapy. In this perspective we not only assess the current knowledge, but also clarify the existing gaps in understanding this increasingly recognized complication after lung transplantation.