Management of autoimmune encephalitis

Risk of Seizure Recurrence Due to Autoimmune Encephalitis With NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, and GABABR Antibodies: Implications for Return to Driving

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with ongoing seizures are usually not allowed to drive. The prognosis for seizure freedom is favorable in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) with antibodies against NMDA receptor (NMDAR), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), and the gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor (GABABR). We hypothesized that after a seizure-free period of 3 months, patients with AIE have a seizure recurrence risk of <20% during the subsequent 12 months. This would render them eligible for noncommercial driving according to driving regulations in several countries.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed follow-up data from patients aged 15 years or older with seizures resulting from NMDAR-, LGI1-, CASPR2-, or GABABR-AIE, who had been seizure-free for ≥3 months. We used Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates for the seizure recurrence risk at 12 months for each antibody group and tested for the effects of potential covariates with regression models.

RESULTS

We included 383 patients with NMDAR-, 440 with LGI1-, 114 with CASPR2-, and 44 with GABABR-AIE from 14 international centers. After being seizure-free for 3 months after an initial seizure period, we calculated the probability of remaining seizure-free for another 12 months (KM estimate) as 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.92) for NMDAR, 0.84 (CI 0.80-0.88) for LGI1, 0.82 (CI 0.75-0.90) for CASPR2, and 0.76 (CI 0.62-0.93) for GABABR.

DISCUSSION

Taking a <20% recurrence risk within 12 months as sufficient, patients with NMDAR-AIE and LGI1-AIE could be considered eligible for noncommercial driving after having been seizure-free for 3 months.

Brazilian consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune encephalitis in the adult and pediatric populations

BACKGROUND

 Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) is a group of inflammatory diseases characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal and glial antigens, leading to subacute psychiatric symptoms, memory complaints, and movement disorders. The patients are predominantly young, and delays in treatment are associated with worse prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

 With the support of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, ABN) and the Brazilian Society of Child Neurology (Sociedade Brasileira de Neurologia Infantil, SBNI), a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of AIE in Brazil was developed using the Delphi method.

METHODS

 A total of 25 panelists, including adult and child neurologists, participated in the study.

RESULTS

 The panelists agreed that patients fulfilling criteria for possible AIE should be screened for antineuronal antibodies in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the tissue-based assay (TBA) and cell-based assay (CBA) techniques. Children should also be screened for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glucoprotein antibodies (anti-MOG). Treatment should be started within the first 4 weeks of symptoms. The first-line option is methylprednisolone plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis, the second-line includes rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide, while third-line treatment options are bortezomib and tocilizumab. Most seizures in AIE are symptomatic, and antiseizure medications may be weaned after the acute stage. In anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis, the panelists have agreed that oral immunosuppressant agents should not be used. Patients should be evaluated at the acute and postacute stages using functional and cognitive scales, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE).

CONCLUSION

 The present study provides tangible evidence for the effective management of AIE patients within the Brazilian healthcare system.

Diagnostic signatures and immune cell infiltration characteristics in anti-GABABR encephalitis

PURPOSE

Anti-gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABABR) encephalitis is an uncommon form of autoimmune encephalitis associated with a poor prognosis and a high fatality rate. We aim to find diagnostic markers for anti- GABABR encephalitis as well as the effects of immune cell infiltration on this pathology.

METHODS

For quantitative proteomic analysis, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation were used in conjunction with LC-MS/MS analysis. To conduct functional correlation analyses, differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified. Following that, we used bioinformatics analysis to screen for and determine the diagnostic signatures of anti- GABABR encephalitis. ROC curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic values. To assess the inflammatory status of anti- GABABR encephalitis, we used cell-type identification by estimating relative subsets of the RNA transcript (CIBERSORT) and explored the link between diagnostic markers and infiltrating immune cells.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 robust DEPs (47 upregulated and 61 downregulated) were identified, of which 11 were immune related. The most impressively enriched pathways were complemented and coagulation cascades, actin cytoskeleton regulation, and cholesterol metabolism; GSEA revealed that the enriched pathways were considerably differentially connected to immune modulation. Eleven immune-related DEPs were chosen for further investigation. We developed a novel diagnostic model based on CSF1R and AZGP1 serum levels using ROC analysis (area under the ROC curve = 1). M1 macrophages and activated natural killer cells are likely to play a role in course of anti- GABABR encephalitis.

CONCLUSION

We identified CSF1R and AZGP1 are possible anti-GABABR encephalitis diagnostic indicators, and immune cell infiltration may have a significant impact on the development and occurrence of anti- GABABR encephalitis.

Anticonvulsive treatment in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). Immunosuppression (IT) is an efficient therapeutic approach, particularly in AIE associated with antibodies against extracellular structures. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) is less clear. However, it may be beneficial in disease refractory to IT or in chronic post-AIE epilepsy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review assessing the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on patients with epileptic seizures due to AIE in whom ASM was used and report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. We included case series (minimum 3 eligible patients), retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. The main outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy of ASM. Secondary outcomes comprise number, type, and adverse effects of ASM. Descriptive statistics were used. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

We screened a total of 3371 studies and included 30 (7 prospective, 23 retrospective). The reports cover a total of 708 patients, the majority (72.5%) suffering from AIE with antibodies against extracellular structures. Type of AIE, seizure frequency, and number and type of ASM used were heterogenous. While most patients profited from IT and/or ASM, the effect of ASM could rarely be isolated. Nine studies report on patients who received ASM monotherapy or were on ASM for a relevant length of time before IT initiation or after IT failure. One study reports a significant association between seizure freedom and use of sodium channel inhibitors. However, levels of evidence were generally low.

CONCLUSION

Few robust data exist on the particular efficacy of ASM in autoimmune epileptic seizures. While these patients generally seem to respond less well to ASM or surgical interventions, sodium channel blockers may have an additional benefit compared to other substances. However, levels of evidence are low and early IT remains the mainstay of AIE therapy. Future trials should address optimal ASM selection and dosing in AIE.

Encephalitis: diagnosis, management and recent advances in the field of encephalitides

Encephalitis describes inflammation of the brain parenchyma, typically caused by either an infectious agent or through an autoimmune process which may be postinfectious, paraneoplastic or idiopathic. Patients can present with a combination of fever, alterations in behaviour, personality, cognition and consciousness. They may also exhibit focal neurological deficits, seizures, movement disorders and/or autonomic instability. However, it can sometimes present non-specifically, and this combined with its many causes make it a difficult to manage neurological syndrome. Despite improved treatments in some forms of encephalitides, encephalitis remains a global concern due to its high mortality and morbidity. Prompt diagnosis and administration of specific and supportive management options can lead to better outcomes. Over the last decade, research in encephalitis has led to marked developments in the understanding, diagnosis and management of encephalitis. In parallel, the number of autoimmune encephalitis syndromes has rapidly expanded and clinically characteristic syndromes in association with pathogenic autoantibodies have been defined. By focusing on findings presented at the Encephalitis Society's conference in December 2021, this article reviews the causes, clinical manifestations and management of encephalitis and integrate recent advances and challenges of research into encephalitis.

Long-term efficacy and safety of different corticosteroid courses plus mycophenolate mofetil for autoimmune encephalitis with neuronal surface antibodies without tumor

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of different-course corticosteroids plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as maintenance therapy in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) with neuronal surface antibodies (NSAbs) without tumor and explore the optimal course of corticosteroids.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with definite AE without tumor were enrolled consecutively between June 2015 and November 2020 and retrospectively divided three groups according to the course of treatment with corticosteroid, i.e., a group of patients with a course of 3-6 months (Group 3-6mo), 6-12 months (Group 6-12mo), and >12 months (Group >12mo). Demographic data, clinical manifestation and ancillary tests results were recorded. The dosage and courses of corticosteroid treatment, the recovery of neurological function, the occurrence of adverse effects, and relapses were followed up.

Results

A total of 55 patients were included in the final analysis. The numbers of patients in Group 3-6 mo, Group 6-12 mo, and Group >12 mo was 14, 17, and 24, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients in Group >12 mo showed a decreased level of consciousness at the onset (12, 50%) than in Group 3-6 mo and Group 6-12 mo (2,14.3%; 3, 17.6%) (p = 0.033). The incidence of MRI abnormalities was significantly higher in Group 6-12 mo and Group >12 mo (10, 58.8%; 16, 66.7%) than in Group 3-6 mo (3, 21.4%) (P=0.023). Ordinal regression analysis indicated that decreased level of consciousness was associated with the course of corticosteroid (OR=3.838, 95% CI: 1.103-13.323, P=0.035). No significant difference was observed between the three groups regarding the cumulative dose of corticosteroids administered during the first three months of long-term treatment (P>0.05). Additionally, no significant difference in the cumulative dosage of corticosteroids was found between patients in Group 6-12 months and Group >12 months during the first 6 months after beginning long-term treatment. The mRS scores of the three groups were not statistically significant before and after first-line treatment or at the last follow-up. Bonferroni multiple comparison test indicated that the mRS scores of patients in Group 6-12 months and Group >12 months were not statistically significant at 3 months and 12 months after the start of long-term treatment. During the follow-up, 50 (90.9%) patients achieved satisfactory neurological function (mRS score ≤2). Five patients (9.1%) experienced a first relapse and 2 of them were overlapped with both anti-NMDA receptor and glial antibodies. The incidence of adverse effects was significantly higher in Group >12 mo (17, 70.8%) than in Group 3-6 mo (3, 21.4%) and Group 6-12 mo (5, 29.4%) (P=0.003).

Conclusions

The beneficial effects of oral corticosteroid treatment may do not persist beyond 12 months and may even contribute to an increased incidence of adverse effects. In order to optimize the effectiveness and safety of treatment, we recommend a corticosteroid course of 3-12 months. Patients with reduced levels of consciousness may be more inclined to choose longer courses of corticosteroids for long-term treatment. Patients with an "overlapping syndrome" may require more intense immunotherapy to prevent relapse.

Clinical analysis of 173 pediatric patients with antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system: a single-center cohort study

Background

Antibody-mediated disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) have seen a gradual rise in their incidence and prevalence. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and short-term prognosis of children with antibody-mediated CNS autoimmune diseases at Hunan Children's Hospital.

Methods

We collected the clinical data of 173 pediatric patients diagnosed with antibody-mediated CNS autoimmune diseases between June 2014 and June 2021 and analyzed their demographics, clinical features, imaging and laboratory data, treatment, and prognosis.

Results

A total of 187 patients tested positive for anti-neural antibodies and 173 patients were finally diagnosed with antibody-mediated CNS autoimmune diseases after excluding the 14 false-positive cases through clinical phenotypic evaluation and follow-up of treatment outcomes. Of the 173 confirmed patients, 97 (56.06%) were positive for anti-NMDA-receptor antibody, 48 (27.75%) for anti-MOG antibody, 30 (17.34%) for anti-GFAP antibody, 5 (2.89%) for anti-CASPR2 antibody, 3 (1.73%) for anti-AQP4 antibody, 2 (1.16%) for anti-GABABR antibody, and 1 (0.58%) for anti-LGI1antibody. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis was the most commonly seen among the patients, followed by MOG antibody-associated disorders and autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy. Psycho-behavioral abnormalities, seizures, involuntary movements, and speech disorder were the most common clinical presentations of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, while fever, headache, and disturbance of consciousness or vision were the most seen among patients with MOG antibody-associated disorders or autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy. The coexistence of multiple anti-neural antibodies was detected in 13 patients, among which 6 cases had coexistent anti-NMDAR and anti-MOG antibodies (including 1 case with anti-GFAP antibody also), 3 cases had coexistent anti-NMDAR and anti-GFAP antibodies, 3 cases had coexistent anti-MOG and anti-GFAP antibodies, 1 case had coexistent anti-NMDAR and anti-CASPR2 antibodies, and 1 case had coexistent anti-GABABR and anti-CASPR2 antibodies. All the survivors were followed up for at least 12 months; 137 recovered completely, 33 had varying sequelae, and 3 died; 22 had one or more relapses.

Conclusion

Antibody-mediated CNS autoimmune diseases occur in children of all ages. Most such pediatric patients have a good response to immunotherapy. Despite the low mortality rate, some survivors have a non-negligible risk of developing relapses.

Increased formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in patients with anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis

Background

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been found to play an important role in several nervous system diseases. However, their role in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the possible role of NETs in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Materials and methods

Eleven patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and ten healthy participants were enrolled. Plasma NETs levels were detected using an immunofluorescence assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, we examined 10 plasma cytokines in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and analyzed the correlation between citrullinated histone 3 levels and cytokine release.

Results

Peripheral blood neutrophils from patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were more susceptible to NET generation. When compared with controls, cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis showed elevated levels of IL-1 α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, MCP-1, and TNF-α (p < 0.05). Moreover, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels were positively correlated with H3Cit levels.

Conclusion

We provide evidence that NETs may play a role in anti-NMDAR encephalitis, providing clues for elucidation of the pathogenesis of this disease.

Efficacy and safety of blood derivatives therapy in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Blood derivatives therapy is a conventional clinical treatment, while the treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is relatively novel. To provide clinical references for treating AD, this meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blood derivatives therapy on the patients with AD.

METHODS

A systematic articles search was performed for eligible studies published up to December 6, 2021 through the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov , Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and Wanfang databases. The included articles were screened by using rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study selection and data-extraction were performed by two authors independently. Random effects model or fixed effects model was used. Quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4. The study was designed and conducted according to the Preferring Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

RESULTS

A total of three plasma administrations (two plasma exchange and one young plasma infusion) and five intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) randomized controlled trials with a sample size of 1148 subjects diagnosed with AD were included. There was no significant difference in cognitive improvement and all-cause discontinuation between intervention and placebo groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79-1.54). And Intervention groups showed not a statistically significant improvement in cognition of included subjects measured by the ADAS-Cog (MD 0.36, 95% CI 0.87-1.59), ADCS-ADL (MD -1.34, 95% CI - 5.01-2.32) and NPI (MD 2.20, 95% CI 0.07-4.32) score compared to the control groups. IVIG is well tolerated for AD patients even under the maximum dose (0.4 g/kg), but it is inferior to placebo in Neuropsychiatric Inventory scale in AD patients (MD 2.19, 95% CI 0.02-4.37).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of blood derivatives therapy for AD are limited. It is necessary to perform well-designed randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes focusing on the appropriate blood derivatives for the specific AD sub-populations in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021233886.

Coexistence of multiple anti-neuronal antibodies in autoimmune encephalitis in China: A multi-center study

Background

Given that the combination of multiple antibodies in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is rare and its clinical significance is unclear, this study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and significance of overlapping multiple anti-neuronal antibodies in patients with AE.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognostic details of 22 patients with multiple coexisting antibodies from multiple clinical centers in China.

Results

Among the 276 patients who were AE antibody-positive, 22 (7.97%) had two or more antibodies. Among the 22 patients with coexisting AE-related antibodies, 14 patients (63.63%) were combined of cell surface and intracellular antibody, and the remaining 8 patients (36.36%) were detected to be cell surface antibody positive only. The main symptoms of the 22 patients in this cohort included fever, seizures, memory impairment, cognitive decline, and sleep disorders. Five (22.73%) patients had tumors, among whom four had small-cell lung cancers, and one had mediastinal tumors. A total of 20 patients were treated with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin, and 18 showed varying degrees of symptomatic improvement after first-line immunotherapy. Three patients died of tumor progression or chemotherapy complications.

Conclusion

The coexistence of multiple anti-neuronal antibodies in patients with AE may cause a superimposition and diversification of clinical manifestations. Combined paraneoplastic antibody positivity may be suggestive of an underlying malignancy.

Thyroid Function and Low Free Triiodothyronine in Chinese Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis

Background and Objectives

Low free triiodothyronine (FT3) is usually associated with worse functional outcome in critical illness; however, the information on thyroid dysfunction and autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is limited. This study aims to evaluate the clinical prognostic value of thyroid function and low-T3 syndrome in patients with multiple subtypes of AE.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we identified the hospital records of 319 candidate patients with AE admitted between January 2016 and December 2020. We then extracted the clinical features and outcomes. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were used to evaluate the patients’ neurological function. The serum levels of FT3, free thyroxine (FT4), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were measured upon admission. Normal thyroid stimulating hormone level with FT3 below the lower limit of the reference interval (2.63 nmol/L) was defined as low-T3 syndrome.

Results

A total of 237 AE cases remained after screening. Among these, 57.81% (137/237) were men and the average age at onset was 41 y (interquartile range, 12–61 y). We found that 83.54% (198/237) of the patients had a good prognosis, and 16.46% (39/237) had a poor prognosis. Abnormal thyroid function was observed in 30.80% of these patients, with a relatively greater prevalence in the group with a poor prognosis (p < 0.001). The serum FT3 levels in the poor-prognosis group were significantly lower than those in the good-prognosis group (p < 0.001). Low-T3 syndrome occurred in 15.19% of AE cases and was more frequent in patients with poor prognosis (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Abnormal thyroid function in AE is frequent, and serum FT3 levels in patients with poor prognosis are significantly lower than in those with good prognosis. Low-T3 syndrome could be a potential candidate for predicting the prognosis of AE following future research.

The safety and efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune encephalitis

OBJECTIVE

Although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the first-line immunotherapy in autoimmune encephalitis, all supporting evidence comes from retrospective case series. Here, we performed a prospective clinical trial of IVIG for functional recovery in autoimmune encephalitis.

METHODS

This single-arm, open-label study assessed the efficacy and safety of 10% intravenous IVIG treatment in newly diagnosed patients with possible autoimmune encephalitis. Patients received IVIG (0.4 g/kg/day) for 5 days. Rescue immunotherapy was permitted when the patient deteriorated before day 8 or showed no improvement at day 8. The primary outcome was the change in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at day 8 and 29. The secondary outcomes were the mRS score improvement and the score changes and improvements on four other clinical scales.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 patients received IVIG (intension-to-treat, ITT), and 18 patients completed the study according to the protocol (per-protocol, PP). mRS improved significantly at days 8 and 29 compared to baseline in both the ITT and PP populations. Other secondary outcomes also improved significantly at day 8, 15, and 29 versus baseline. In the PP population, 6/18 patients achieved favorable outcomes with IVIG alone (mRS = 0~2 at day 8), and 12/18 patients received rescue immunotherapy. Five adverse events were reported in relation to IVIG, all of which were mild.

INTERPRETATION

IVIG improved neurological functional outcomes, and the improvement was evident by day 8. Adverse effects were tolerable. These data provide the prospective evidence regarding the efficacy of IVIG in improving the functional outcomes of autoimmune encephalitis.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Anti-NMDAR, Anti-LGI1, and Anti-GABABR Encephalitis

Objective

We aimed to investigate the mortality rate and identify the predictors of death in patients with anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, and anti-GABABR encephalitis.

Methods

Patients with anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, and anti-GABABR encephalitis were recruited from the Neurology Department of the First Hospital of Jilin University from March 2015 to November 2021. The primary outcome variable was a binary variable of death vs. survival. The potential risk factors for mortality were evaluated. The mortality rates were determined, and the independent predictors of death were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 100 hospitalized patients with anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, or anti-GABABR encephalitis were included in the final analysis. Fifteen patients (15%) died during a median follow-up period of 18 months. The mortality rates were 10% for anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 2.8% for anti-LGI1 encephalitis, and 41.7% for anti-GABABR encephalitis. The multivariable analysis results showed that older age at onset [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.017, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.009–1.136; p = 0.023] was independently associated with an increased risk of death. Antibody type was also associated with mortality. Patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis had 13.458-fold greater odds of dying than patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis (adjusted OR = 13.458, 95% CI = 1.270–142.631; p = 0.031).

Conclusion

The general mortality rate of anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, and anti-GABABR encephalitis was 15%. Age at onset and type of autoimmune encephalitis antibody were independent predictors of death in these patients.

Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Prognosis of Children With Antibody-Mediated Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prevalence of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is gradually increasing in pediatric patients (between the ages of 3 months and 16 years). The aim of this retrospective observational study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and short-term prognosis of children with antibody-mediated AE at Hunan Children's Hospital.

METHODS

Antibody analysis of blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid was performed in suspected AE patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, Hunan Children's Hospital from June 2014 to June 2021. Ultimately, 103 patients were diagnosed with antibody-mediated AE and were enrolled in this study. Clinical data and corresponding demographic, clinical characteristics, laboratory and imaging data, treatment, and prognosis data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In our study, 103 AE patients with antibody-positive were identified. The main subtype of AE in our cohort was anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Few patients have anti-CASPR2 encephalitis, anti-GABABR encephalitis, or anti-LGI1 encephalitis. In our AE patients, the most common clinical manifestations were behavioral symptoms, seizures, and involuntary movements, with seizures being the most common initial symptom. All patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Forty-five (43.7%) patients had abnormal MRI findings. And 96 (93.2%) patients had abnormal EEG results. All 103 patients were given first-line immunotherapy, 21 of which were also treated with the combination of the second-line immunotherapy. All surviving patients were followed up for at least 6 months. Seventy-seven patients recovered completely, 23 had sequelae of different degrees, and 3 died. Eight patients had one or more relapses during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

AE is a treatable disease that can occur in children of all ages. The mortality rate is low, as most patients have a good response to immune therapy. Compared with the older children, infants and young children (≤ 3 years old) with anti-NMDAR encephalitis have a higher incidence of fever and status epilepticus, more severe condition, higher PICU admission rate and worse prognosis. AE patients with high maximum mRS scores and PICU admissions may require second-line immunotherapy.

Role of Increased Syncytin-1 Expression in Pathogenesis of Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis

PURPOSE

Syncytin-1 may play a role in several neuropsychiatric disorders, but its function in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the possible mechanism of action of syncytin-1 in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and eight controls were recruited. The protein levels of syncytin-1 in serum were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the transcript levels of syncytin-1 were determined using real-time quantitative PCR. Flow cytometry was used for peripheral blood lymphocyte subset detection. Further, the relationship between syncytin-1 levels and clinical features of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets was analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with those in controls, higher syncytin-1 levels and percentage of B cells (CD3-CD19+) were observed in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Among anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients, the level of syncytin-1 positively correlated with the proportion of B cells and modified Rankin scale score at onset and after immunotherapy and negatively correlated with the proportion of CD3+ T cells.

CONCLUSION

An increased expression of Syncytin-1 is associated with the pathogenesis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, providing evidence for elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease and suggesting novel therapeutic targets. Further, this study clarifies the role of syncytin-1 in neuroimmune disorders.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis in the East of China: A Multi-Center Study

Objective: This study aimed to investigate epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, and long-term outcomes of patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in the east of China.

Methods: From January 2015 to December 2019, 226 potential AE patients were recruited from five clinical centers, and a total of 185 patients who met the diagnostic criteria were included in the study. We retrospectively reviewed clinical features, auxiliary examinations, details of treatments, and outcomes of AE, and identified risk factors of poor prognosis. Modified Rankin Scale scores were used to evaluate neurological function, and scores of 3–6 indicated a poor-prognosis.

Results: Patients with five main subtypes of AE were enrolled in the study, as follows: anti-NMDAR (79), anti-LGI1 (55), anti-CASPR2 (30), anti-GABABR (16), and anti-AMPAR (5). Among 185 patients, 58.38% (108/185) were male and 41.62% (77/185) were female. The median age at disease onset was 41 years (interquartile range, 17–62). The most common clinical manifestations of AE were seizures (146, 78.92%) and memory deficit (123, 66.49%). A total of 95 (51.35%) patients had abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging results. Electroencephalographic findings were abnormal in 131 (70.81%) patients, and 168 (90.81%) and 26 (14.05%) patients were treated with first- and second-line immunotherapies, respectively. All surviving patients were followed-up for at least 1 year (range 12–36 months). Good clinical outcomes were achieved in 117 (63.24%), while 68 (36.76%) patients had a poor prognosis. Further, 33 (17.84%) patients relapsed and 10 (5.41%) died within 1 year post-discharge. Older patients tended to have a poorer prognosis, and the occurrence of mental behavioral disorders, movement disorders, disturbance of consciousness, central hypoventilation, and tumors were overrepresented in the poor-prognosis group.

Conclusions: AE is a treatable disease, and most patients have a good prognosis. There are differences in the clinical manifestations of patients with different AE subtypes. Some with AE will relapse, and long-term follow-up is of great significance for further research.

Neuropsychological Evaluations in Limbic Encephalitis

Limbic encephalitis (LE) can cause dynamic and permanent impairment of cognition and behavior. In clinical practice, the question arises as to which cognitive and behavioral domains are affected by LE and which assessment is suited to monitor the disease progress and the success of treatment. Current findings on cognition and behavior in LE are reviewed and discussed based on current guidelines and consensus papers. In addition, we outline approaches for the neuropsychological monitoring of LE and its treatment. Dependent on disease acuity and severity, LE leads to episodic long-term memory dysfunction in different variants (e.g., anterograde memory impairment, accelerated long-term forgetting, and affection of autobiographical memory) and executive deficits. In addition, affective disorders are very common. More severe psychiatric symptoms may occur as well. In the course of the disease, dynamic phases with functional recovery must be differentiated from residual defect states. Evidence-based neuropsychological diagnostics should be conducted ideally before treatment initiation and reassessments are indicated when any progress is suggested, and when decisive anti-seizure or immunomodulatory treatment changes are made. Cognition and behavior may but must not run in synchrony with seizures, MRI pathology, or immune parameters. Cognitive and behavioral problems are integral aspects of LE and represent important biomarkers of disease acuity, progress, and therapy response beyond and in addition to parameters of immunology, neurological symptoms, and brain imaging. Thus, evidence-based neuropsychological assessments are essential for the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected or diagnosed limbic encephalitis, for treatment decisions, and disease and treatment monitoring.