1
|
Weatherton M, Schussler EE, Brigati JR, Ferguson H, Boyd I, England BJ. Is Support in the Anxiety of the Beholder? How Anxiety Interacts with Perceptions of Instructor Support in Introductory Biology Classes. CBE LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION 2024; 23:ar45. [PMID: 39321154 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
High levels of student anxiety are negatively related to degree persistence, academic achievement, and student perceptions of instructor support. Anxiety levels vary along many axes-among classes, within students in the same class, and over time-creating a dynamic emotional landscape in classrooms. In this study, we examined the relationship between student anxiety levels and perceptions of instructor support within three introductory biology classes at two timepoints during a semester. Data on student anxiety levels and perceptions of instructor support were supplemented by open-ended student explanations of instructor support characteristics. We found a significant negative correlation between student anxiety level and instructor support ratings at wk 4 for all three classes. By wk 14, this correlation persisted in classes 1 and 3 but not class 2, where support ratings no longer significantly varied with anxiety levels. Analyses of open responses revealed that lower-anxiety students in classes 1 and 3 were more positive about how the instructors answered questions and higher-anxiety students in class 2 were more positive about their instructor's pedagogical practices. We suggest that these instructor practices should be investigated as potential factors to equalize perceptions of instructor support by students with different anxiety levels in introductory biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryrose Weatherton
- Department of Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | - Elisabeth E Schussler
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | | | - Hope Ferguson
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | - Isabel Boyd
- Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen L, Wang Y, Wu Z, Shan Y, Li T, Hung SC, Xing L, Zhu H, Wang L, Lin W, Li G. Four-dimensional mapping of dynamic longitudinal brain subcortical development and early learning functions in infants. Nat Commun 2023; 14:3727. [PMID: 37349301 PMCID: PMC10287661 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38974-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain subcortical structures are paramount in many cognitive functions and their aberrations during infancy are predisposed to various neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, making it highly essential to characterize the early subcortical normative growth patterns. This study investigates the volumetric development and surface area expansion of six subcortical structures and their associations with Mullen scales of early learning by leveraging 513 high-resolution longitudinal MRI scans within the first two postnatal years. Results show that (1) each subcortical structure (except for the amygdala with an approximately linear increase) undergoes rapid nonlinear volumetric growth after birth, which slows down at a structure-specific age with bilaterally similar developmental patterns; (2) Subcortical local area expansion reveals structure-specific and spatiotemporally heterogeneous patterns; (3) Positive associations between thalamus and both receptive and expressive languages and between caudate and putamen and fine motor are revealed. This study advances our understanding of the dynamic early subcortical developmental patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangjun Chen
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Ya Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Zhengwang Wu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Yue Shan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Tengfei Li
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Sheng-Che Hung
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Lei Xing
- UNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 116 Manning Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Hongtu Zhu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Weili Lin
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen L, Wu Z, Zhao F, Wang Y, Lin W, Wang L, Li G. An attention-based context-informed deep framework for infant brain subcortical segmentation. Neuroimage 2023; 269:119931. [PMID: 36746299 PMCID: PMC10241225 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Precise segmentation of subcortical structures from infant brain magnetic resonance (MR) images plays an essential role in studying early subcortical structural and functional developmental patterns and diagnosis of related brain disorders. However, due to the dynamic appearance changes, low tissue contrast, and tiny subcortical size in infant brain MR images, infant subcortical segmentation is a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a context-guided, attention-based, coarse-to-fine deep framework to precisely segment the infant subcortical structures. At the coarse stage, we aim to directly predict the signed distance maps (SDMs) from multi-modal intensity images, including T1w, T2w, and the ratio of T1w and T2w images, with an SDM-Unet, which can leverage the spatial context information, including the structural position information and the shape information of the target structure, to generate high-quality SDMs. At the fine stage, the predicted SDMs, which encode spatial-context information of each subcortical structure, are integrated with the multi-modal intensity images as the input to a multi-source and multi-path attention Unet (M2A-Unet) for achieving refined segmentation. Both the 3D spatial and channel attention blocks are added to guide the M2A-Unet to focus more on the important subregions and channels. We additionally incorporate the inner and outer subcortical boundaries as extra labels to help precisely estimate the ambiguous boundaries. We validate our method on an infant MR image dataset and on an unrelated neonatal MR image dataset. Compared to eleven state-of-the-art methods, the proposed framework consistently achieves higher segmentation accuracy in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of infant MR images and also exhibits good generalizability in the neonatal dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangjun Chen
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Zhengwang Wu
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Fenqiang Zhao
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Ya Wang
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Weili Lin
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dima D, Modabbernia A, Papachristou E, Doucet GE, Agartz I, Aghajani M, Akudjedu TN, Albajes‐Eizagirre A, Alnæs D, Alpert KI, Andersson M, Andreasen NC, Andreassen OA, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Bargallo N, Baumeister S, Baur‐Streubel R, Bertolino A, Bonvino A, Boomsma DI, Borgwardt S, Bourque J, Brandeis D, Breier A, Brodaty H, Brouwer RM, Buitelaar JK, Busatto GF, Buckner RL, Calhoun V, Canales‐Rodríguez EJ, Cannon DM, Caseras X, Castellanos FX, Cervenka S, Chaim‐Avancini TM, Ching CRK, Chubar V, Clark VP, Conrod P, Conzelmann A, Crespo‐Facorro B, Crivello F, Crone EA, Dannlowski U, Dale AM, Davey C, de Geus EJC, de Haan L, de Zubicaray GI, den Braber A, Dickie EW, Di Giorgio A, Doan NT, Dørum ES, Ehrlich S, Erk S, Espeseth T, Fatouros‐Bergman H, Fisher SE, Fouche J, Franke B, Frodl T, Fuentes‐Claramonte P, Glahn DC, Gotlib IH, Grabe H, Grimm O, Groenewold NA, Grotegerd D, Gruber O, Gruner P, Gur RE, Gur RC, Hahn T, Harrison BJ, Hartman CA, Hatton SN, Heinz A, Heslenfeld DJ, Hibar DP, Hickie IB, Ho B, Hoekstra PJ, Hohmann S, Holmes AJ, Hoogman M, Hosten N, Howells FM, Hulshoff Pol HE, Huyser C, Jahanshad N, James A, Jernigan TL, Jiang J, Jönsson EG, Joska JA, Kahn R, Kalnin A, Kanai R, Klein M, Klyushnik TP, Koenders L, Koops S, Krämer B, Kuntsi J, Lagopoulos J, Lázaro L, Lebedeva I, Lee WH, Lesch K, Lochner C, Machielsen MWJ, Maingault S, Martin NG, Martínez‐Zalacaín I, Mataix‐Cols D, Mazoyer B, McDonald C, McDonald BC, McIntosh AM, McMahon KL, McPhilemy G, Meinert S, Menchón JM, Medland SE, Meyer‐Lindenberg A, Naaijen J, Najt P, Nakao T, Nordvik JE, Nyberg L, Oosterlaan J, de la Foz VO, Paloyelis Y, Pauli P, Pergola G, Pomarol‐Clotet E, Portella MJ, Potkin SG, Radua J, Reif A, Rinker DA, Roffman JL, Rosa PGP, Sacchet MD, Sachdev PS, Salvador R, Sánchez‐Juan P, Sarró S, Satterthwaite TD, Saykin AJ, Serpa MH, Schmaal L, Schnell K, Schumann G, Sim K, Smoller JW, Sommer I, Soriano‐Mas C, Stein DJ, Strike LT, Swagerman SC, Tamnes CK, Temmingh HS, Thomopoulos SI, Tomyshev AS, Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez D, Trollor JN, Turner JA, Uhlmann A, van den Heuvel OA, van den Meer D, van der Wee NJA, van Haren NEM, van't Ent D, van Erp TGM, Veer IM, Veltman DJ, Voineskos A, Völzke H, Walter H, Walton E, Wang L, Wang Y, Wassink TH, Weber B, Wen W, West JD, Westlye LT, Whalley H, Wierenga LM, Williams SCR, Wittfeld K, Wolf DH, Worker A, Wright MJ, Yang K, Yoncheva Y, Zanetti MV, Ziegler GC, Thompson PM, Frangou S. Subcortical volumes across the lifespan: Data from 18,605 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:452-469. [PMID: 33570244 PMCID: PMC8675429 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Age has a major effect on brain volume. However, the normative studies available are constrained by small sample sizes, restricted age coverage and significant methodological variability. These limitations introduce inconsistencies and may obscure or distort the lifespan trajectories of brain morphometry. In response, we capitalized on the resources of the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium to examine age-related trajectories inferred from cross-sectional measures of the ventricles, the basal ganglia (caudate, putamen, pallidum, and nucleus accumbens), the thalamus, hippocampus and amygdala using magnetic resonance imaging data obtained from 18,605 individuals aged 3-90 years. All subcortical structure volumes were at their maximum value early in life. The volume of the basal ganglia showed a monotonic negative association with age thereafter; there was no significant association between age and the volumes of the thalamus, amygdala and the hippocampus (with some degree of decline in thalamus) until the sixth decade of life after which they also showed a steep negative association with age. The lateral ventricles showed continuous enlargement throughout the lifespan. Age was positively associated with inter-individual variability in the hippocampus and amygdala and the lateral ventricles. These results were robust to potential confounders and could be used to examine the functional significance of deviations from typical age-related morphometric patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danai Dima
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Social SciencesCity University of LondonLondonUK
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | | | - Ingrid Agartz
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Department of Psychiatric ResearchDiakonhjemmet HospitalOsloNorway
- Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Moji Aghajani
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical CentreLocation VUmcAmsterdamNetherlands
- Institute of Education & Child StudiesSection Forensic Family & Youth Care, Leiden UniversityNetherlands
| | - Theophilus N. Akudjedu
- Institute of Medical Imaging and Visualisation, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesBournemouth UniversityPooleUK
- Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics and NCBES Galway Neuroscience CentreNational University of IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Anton Albajes‐Eizagirre
- FIDMAG Germanes HospitalàriesMadridSpain
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
| | - Dag Alnæs
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | | | - Micael Andersson
- Department of Integrative Medical BiologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
| | - Nancy C. Andreasen
- Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of MedicineThe University of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Ole A. Andreassen
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Philip Asherson
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Tobias Banaschewski
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental HealthHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
| | - Nuria Bargallo
- Imaging Diagnostic Centre, Hospital ClinicBarcelona University ClinicBarcelonaSpain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institut (IDIBAPS)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Sarah Baumeister
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental HealthHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
| | - Ramona Baur‐Streubel
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyUniversity of WürzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Alessandro Bertolino
- Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense OrgansUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
| | - Aurora Bonvino
- Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense OrgansUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
| | - Dorret I. Boomsma
- Department of Biological PsychologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Stefan Borgwardt
- Department of Psychiatry & PsychotherapyUniversity of LübeckLubeckGermany
| | - Josiane Bourque
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Daniel Brandeis
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental HealthHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
| | - Alan Breier
- Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Rachel M. Brouwer
- Rudolf Magnus Institute of NeuroscienceUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Jan K. Buitelaar
- Donders Center of Medical NeurosciencesRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Donders Centre for Cognitive NeuroimagingRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Geraldo F. Busatto
- Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Randy L. Buckner
- Department of Psychology, Center for Brain ScienceHarvard UniversityCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
- Department of PsychiatryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Vincent Calhoun
- Tri‐Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, USA Neurology, Radiology, Psychiatry and Biomedical EngineeringEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Dara M. Cannon
- Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics and NCBES Galway Neuroscience CentreNational University of IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Xavier Caseras
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and GenomicsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | | | - Simon Cervenka
- Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Stockholm Health Care ServicesStockholm RegionStockholmSweden
| | - Tiffany M. Chaim‐Avancini
- Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Christopher R. K. Ching
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Victoria Chubar
- Department of NeuroscienceKU Leuven, Mind‐Body Research GroupLeuvenBelgium
| | - Vincent P. Clark
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
- Mind Research NetworkAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Patricia Conrod
- Department of PsychiatryUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
| | - Annette Conzelmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and PsychotherapyUniversity of TübingenTubingenGermany
| | - Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
- HU Virgen del Rocio, IBiS, University of SevillaSevillaSpain
| | - Fabrice Crivello
- Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR5293Université de BordeauxTalenceFrance
| | - Eveline A. Crone
- Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural SciencesErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
- Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen, Instituut PsychologieUniversiteit LeidenLeidenNetherlands
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity of MünsterMunsterGermany
| | - Anders M. Dale
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, Department of Neuroscience and Department of RadiologyUniversity of California‐San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Eco J. C. de Geus
- Department of Biological PsychologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Lieuwe de Haan
- Academisch Medisch CentrumUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Greig I. de Zubicaray
- Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Department of Biological PsychologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Erin W. Dickie
- Kimel Family Translational Imaging Genetics LaboratoryCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMHTorontoCanada
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Annabella Di Giorgio
- Biological Psychiatry Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della SofferenzaSan Giovanni Rotondo (FG)Italy
| | - Nhat Trung Doan
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Erlend S. Dørum
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital HTNesoddenNorway
| | - Stefan Ehrlich
- Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental NeurosciencesTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
- Faculty of MedicineUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Susanne Erk
- Division of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyCharité‐Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Thomas Espeseth
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Bjørknes CollegeOsloNorway
| | - Helena Fatouros‐Bergman
- Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Stockholm Health Care ServicesStockholm RegionStockholmSweden
| | - Simon E. Fisher
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Language and Genetics DepartmentMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Jean‐Paul Fouche
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental HealthUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
| | - Barbara Franke
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Department of Human GeneticsRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenNetherlands
- Department of PsychiatryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Thomas Frodl
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyOtto von Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
| | - Paola Fuentes‐Claramonte
- FIDMAG Germanes HospitalàriesMadridSpain
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
| | - David C. Glahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Tommy Fuss Center for Neuropsychiatric Disease Research Boston Children's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Ian H. Gotlib
- Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Hans‐Jörgen Grabe
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medicine Greifswald, University of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)Site Rostock/GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Oliver Grimm
- Department for Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum FrankfurtGoethe UniversitatFrankfurtGermany
| | - Nynke A. Groenewold
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental HealthUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
- Neuroscience InstituteUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
| | | | - Oliver Gruber
- Section for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General PsychiatryHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | - Patricia Gruner
- Department of PsychiatryYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Learning Based Recovery CenterVA Connecticut Health SystemNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Rachel E. Gur
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Tim Hahn
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity of MünsterMunsterGermany
| | - Ben J. Harrison
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry CenterUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Catharine A. Hartman
- Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulationUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenNetherlands
| | - Sean N. Hatton
- Brain and Mind CentreUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Andreas Heinz
- Faculty of MedicineUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Dirk J. Heslenfeld
- Departments of Experimental and Clinical PsychologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Derrek P. Hibar
- Personalized HealthcareGenentech, IncSouth San FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ian B. Hickie
- Brain and Mind CentreUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Beng‐Choon Ho
- Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of MedicineThe University of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Pieter J. Hoekstra
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenNetherlands
| | - Sarah Hohmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental HealthHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
| | - Avram J. Holmes
- Department of PsychologyYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Martine Hoogman
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental HealthUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
| | - Norbert Hosten
- Norbert Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity Medicine Greifswald, University of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Fleur M. Howells
- Language and Genetics DepartmentMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenNetherlands
- Department for Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum FrankfurtGoethe UniversitatFrankfurtGermany
| | | | - Chaim Huyser
- Bascule, Academic Centre for Children and Adolescent PsychiatryDuivendrechtNetherlands
| | - Neda Jahanshad
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Terry L. Jernigan
- Center for Human Development, Departments of Cognitive Science, Psychiatry, and RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jiyang Jiang
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Erik G. Jönsson
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Stockholm Health Care ServicesStockholm RegionStockholmSweden
| | - John A. Joska
- Language and Genetics DepartmentMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Rene Kahn
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Andrew Kalnin
- Department of RadiologyOhio State University College of MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Ryota Kanai
- Department of NeuroinformaticsAraya, IncTokyoJapan
| | - Marieke Klein
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental HealthUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Laura Koenders
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Sanne Koops
- Rudolf Magnus Institute of NeuroscienceUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Bernd Krämer
- Section for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General PsychiatryHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | - Jonna Kuntsi
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jim Lagopoulos
- Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience, Thompson InstituteUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSunshine CoastAustralia
| | - Luisa Lázaro
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and PsychologyHospital Clinic, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Irina Lebedeva
- Mental Health Research CenterRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoskvaRussia
| | - Won Hee Lee
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Klaus‐Peter Lesch
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and PsychotherapyJulius‐Maximilians Universität WürzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Christine Lochner
- SA MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of PsychiatryStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
| | | | - Sophie Maingault
- Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR5293Université de BordeauxTalenceFrance
| | - Nicholas G. Martin
- Queensland Institute of Medical ResearchBerghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Ignacio Martínez‐Zalacaín
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
- Department of PsychiatryBellvitge University Hospital‐IDIBELL, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - David Mataix‐Cols
- Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Stockholm Health Care ServicesStockholm RegionStockholmSweden
| | - Bernard Mazoyer
- Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR5293Université de BordeauxTalenceFrance
| | - Colm McDonald
- Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics and NCBES Galway Neuroscience CentreNational University of IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | | | - Katie L. McMahon
- School of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Health and Biomedical InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Genevieve McPhilemy
- Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics and NCBES Galway Neuroscience CentreNational University of IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Susanne Meinert
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity of MünsterMunsterGermany
| | - José M. Menchón
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
- Department of PsychiatryBellvitge University Hospital‐IDIBELL, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Sarah E. Medland
- Queensland Institute of Medical ResearchBerghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental HealthHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | - Jilly Naaijen
- Donders Centre for Cognitive NeuroimagingRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Pablo Najt
- Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Centre for Neuroimaging and Cognitive Genomics and NCBES Galway Neuroscience CentreNational University of IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Tomohiro Nakao
- Department of Clinical MedicineKyushu UniversityKyushuJapan
| | | | - Lars Nyberg
- Department of Integrative Medical BiologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå Center for Functional Brain ImagingUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
| | - Jaap Oosterlaan
- Department of Clinical NeuropsychologyAmsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Víctor Ortiz‐García de la Foz
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital “Marques de Valdecilla”Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
- Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Yannis Paloyelis
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Paul Pauli
- Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyUniversity of WürzburgWurzburgGermany
- Centre of Mental HealthUniversity of WürzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Giulio Pergola
- Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense OrgansUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
| | - Edith Pomarol‐Clotet
- FIDMAG Germanes HospitalàriesMadridSpain
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
| | - Maria J. Portella
- FIDMAG Germanes HospitalàriesMadridSpain
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant PauUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Steven G. Potkin
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Joaquim Radua
- Centre for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institut (IDIBAPS)BarcelonaSpain
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology & Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Andreas Reif
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)Site Rostock/GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Daniel A. Rinker
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Joshua L. Roffman
- Department of PsychiatryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Pedro G. P. Rosa
- Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Matthew D. Sacchet
- Center for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress ResearchMcLean Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Perminder S. Sachdev
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | | | - Pascual Sánchez‐Juan
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital “Marques de Valdecilla”Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED)MadridSpain
| | | | | | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Mauricio H. Serpa
- Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Lianne Schmaal
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia
- Centre for Youth Mental HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Knut Schnell
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medical Center GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Gunter Schumann
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Centre for Population Neuroscience and Precision Medicine, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology & Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Kang Sim
- Institute of Mental HealthSingaporeSingapore
| | - Jordan W. Smoller
- Center for Genomic MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Iris Sommer
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, Rijksuniversiteit GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGöttingenNetherlands
| | - Carles Soriano‐Mas
- Mental Health Research Networking Center (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
- Department of PsychiatryBellvitge University Hospital‐IDIBELL, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Dan J. Stein
- SA MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of PsychiatryStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
| | | | | | - Christian K. Tamnes
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Department of Psychiatric ResearchDiakonhjemmet HospitalOsloNorway
- PROMENTA Research Center, Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Henk S. Temmingh
- Language and Genetics DepartmentMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Sophia I. Thomopoulos
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Diana Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez
- FIDMAG Germanes HospitalàriesMadridSpain
- Neuroimaging Unit, Technological FacilitiesValdecilla Biomedical Research Institute IDIVALSantanderSpain
| | - Julian N. Trollor
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Jessica A. Turner
- College of Arts and SciencesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Anne Uhlmann
- Language and Genetics DepartmentMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Odile A. van den Heuvel
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical CentreLocation VUmcAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Dennis van den Meer
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtNetherlands
| | - Nic J. A. van der Wee
- Department of PsychiatryLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenNetherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeidenNetherlands
| | - Neeltje E. M. van Haren
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/PsychologyErasmus University Medical Center, Sophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Dennis van't Ent
- Department of Biological PsychologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Theo G. M. van Erp
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
- Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
- Institute of Community MedicineUniversity Medicine, Greifswald, University of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Ilya M. Veer
- Faculty of MedicineUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Dick J. Veltman
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical CentreLocation VUmcAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Aristotle Voineskos
- Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
- Kimel Family Translational Imaging Genetics LaboratoryCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMHTorontoCanada
| | - Henry Völzke
- Institute of Community MedicineUniversity Medicine, Greifswald, University of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), partner site GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Henrik Walter
- Faculty of MedicineUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | | | - Lei Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of RadiologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsinUSA
| | - Thomas H. Wassink
- Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of MedicineThe University of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Bernd Weber
- Institute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognition ResearchUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
| | - Wei Wen
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - John D. West
- Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Lars T. Westlye
- Biological Psychiatry Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della SofferenzaSan Giovanni Rotondo (FG)Italy
| | | | - Lara M. Wierenga
- Developmental and Educational Psychology UnitInstitute of Psychology, Leiden UniversityLeidenNetherlands
| | - Steven C. R. Williams
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Katharina Wittfeld
- Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medicine Greifswald, University of GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Daniel H. Wolf
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Amanda Worker
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Kun Yang
- National High Magnetic Field LaboratoryFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeFloridaUSA
| | - Yulyia Yoncheva
- Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryChild Study Center, NYU Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Marcus V. Zanetti
- Laboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
- Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio‐LibanêsSão PauloBrazil
| | - Georg C. Ziegler
- Division of Molecular Psychiatry, Center of Mental HealthUniversity of WürzburgWurzburgGermany
| | - Paul M. Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sophia Frangou
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gao J, Skouras S, Leung HK, Wu BWY, Wu H, Chang C, Sik HH. Repetitive Religious Chanting Invokes Positive Emotional Schema to Counterbalance Fear: A Multi-Modal Functional and Structural MRI Study. Front Behav Neurosci 2020; 14:548856. [PMID: 33328917 PMCID: PMC7732428 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.548856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction During hard times, religious chanting/praying is widely practiced to cope with negative or stressful emotions. While the underlying neural mechanism has not been investigated to a sufficient extent. A previous event-related potential study showed that religious chanting could significantly diminish the late-positive potential induced by negative stimuli. However, the regulatory role of subcortical brain regions, especially the amygdala, in this process remains unclear. This multi-modal MRI study aimed to further clarify the neural mechanism underlying the effectiveness of religious chanting for emotion regulation. Methodology Twenty-one participants were recruited for a multi-modal MRI study. Their age range was 40–52 years, 11 were female and all participants had at least 1 year of experience in religious chanting. The participants were asked to view neutral/fearful pictures while practicing religious chanting (i.e., chanting the name of Buddha Amitābha), non-religious chanting (i.e., chanting the name of Santa Claus), or no chanting. A 3.0 T Philips MRI scanner was used to collect the data and SPM12 was used to analyze the imaging data. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to explore the potential hemispheric asymmetries in practitioners. Results Compared to non-religious chanting and no chanting, higher brain activity was observed in several brain regions when participants performed religious chanting while viewing fearful images. These brain regions included the fusiform gyrus, left parietal lobule, and prefrontal cortex, as well as subcortical regions such as the amygdala, thalamus, and midbrain. Importantly, significantly more activity was observed in the left than in the right amygdala during religious chanting. VBM showed hemispheric asymmetries, mainly in the thalamus, putamen, hippocampus, amygdala, and cerebellum; areas related to skill learning and biased memory formation. Conclusion This preliminary study showed that repetitive religious chanting may induce strong brain activity, especially in response to stimuli with negative valence. Practicing religious chanting may structurally lateralize a network of brain areas involved in biased memory formation. These functional and structural results suggest that religious chanting helps to form a positive schema to counterbalance negative emotions. Future randomized control studies are necessary to confirm the neural mechanism related to religious chanting in coping with stress and negative emotions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junling Gao
- Buddhism and Science Research Lab, Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Stavros Skouras
- Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hang Kin Leung
- Buddhism and Science Research Lab, Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bonnie Wai Yan Wu
- Buddhism and Science Research Lab, Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Huijun Wu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chunqi Chang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hin Hung Sik
- Buddhism and Science Research Lab, Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oliva A. Parallel Pathways for Mnemonic Processing. Trends Neurosci 2020; 44:79-81. [PMID: 33256999 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
In a recent study, Chen et al. showed that divergent subcortical-hippocampal projections are necessary for mnemonic processing. With a combination of elegant experiments, the authors revealed that, whereas a projection from the supramammillary nucleus (SuM) to dentate gyrus (DG) is needed for contextual memory, social memory requires the SuM-CA2 pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azahara Oliva
- Department of Neuroscience, The Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grossberg S. A Path Toward Explainable AI and Autonomous Adaptive Intelligence: Deep Learning, Adaptive Resonance, and Models of Perception, Emotion, and Action. Front Neurorobot 2020; 14:36. [PMID: 32670045 PMCID: PMC7330174 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological neural network models whereby brains make minds help to understand autonomous adaptive intelligence. This article summarizes why the dynamics and emergent properties of such models for perception, cognition, emotion, and action are explainable, and thus amenable to being confidently implemented in large-scale applications. Key to their explainability is how these models combine fast activations, or short-term memory (STM) traces, and learned weights, or long-term memory (LTM) traces. Visual and auditory perceptual models have explainable conscious STM representations of visual surfaces and auditory streams in surface-shroud resonances and stream-shroud resonances, respectively. Deep Learning is often used to classify data. However, Deep Learning can experience catastrophic forgetting: At any stage of learning, an unpredictable part of its memory can collapse. Even if it makes some accurate classifications, they are not explainable and thus cannot be used with confidence. Deep Learning shares these problems with the back propagation algorithm, whose computational problems due to non-local weight transport during mismatch learning were described in the 1980s. Deep Learning became popular after very fast computers and huge online databases became available that enabled new applications despite these problems. Adaptive Resonance Theory, or ART, algorithms overcome the computational problems of back propagation and Deep Learning. ART is a self-organizing production system that incrementally learns, using arbitrary combinations of unsupervised and supervised learning and only locally computable quantities, to rapidly classify large non-stationary databases without experiencing catastrophic forgetting. ART classifications and predictions are explainable using the attended critical feature patterns in STM on which they build. The LTM adaptive weights of the fuzzy ARTMAP algorithm induce fuzzy IF-THEN rules that explain what feature combinations predict successful outcomes. ART has been successfully used in multiple large-scale real world applications, including remote sensing, medical database prediction, and social media data clustering. Also explainable are the MOTIVATOR model of reinforcement learning and cognitive-emotional interactions, and the VITE, DIRECT, DIVA, and SOVEREIGN models for reaching, speech production, spatial navigation, and autonomous adaptive intelligence. These biological models exemplify complementary computing, and use local laws for match learning and mismatch learning that avoid the problems of Deep Learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Departments of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, Center for Adaptive Systems, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glazer J, King A, Yoon C, Liberzon I, Kitayama S. DRD4 polymorphisms modulate reward positivity and P3a in a gambling task: Exploring a genetic basis for cultural learning. Psychophysiology 2020; 57:e13623. [PMID: 32583892 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Prior work shows that people respond more plastically to environmental influences, including cultural influences, if they carry the 7 or 2-repeat (7/2R) allelic variant of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). The 7/2R carriers are thus more likely to endorse the norms and values of their culture. So far, however, mechanisms underlying this moderation of cultural acquisition by DRD4 are unclear. To address this gap in knowledge, we tested the hypothesis that DRD4 modulates the processing of reward cues existing in the environment. About 72 young adults, preselected for their DRD4 status, performed a gambling task, while the electroencephalogram was recorded. Principal components of event-related potentials aligned to the Reward-Positivity (associated with bottom-up processing of reward prediction errors) and frontal-P3 (associated with top-down attention) were both significantly more positive following gains than following losses. As predicted, the gain-loss differences were significantly larger for 7/2R carriers than for noncarriers. Also, as predicted, the cultural backgrounds of the participants (East Asian vs. European American) did not moderate the effects of DRD4. Our findings suggest that the 7/2R variant of DRD4 enhances (a) the detection of reward prediction errors and (b) controlled attention that updates the context for the reward, thereby suggesting one possible mechanism underlying the DRD4 × Culture interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Glazer
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Anthony King
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Carolyn Yoon
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Israel Liberzon
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Shinobu Kitayama
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Seven Properties of Self-Organization in the Human Brain. BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/bdcc4020010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The principle of self-organization has acquired a fundamental significance in the newly emerging field of computational philosophy. Self-organizing systems have been described in various domains in science and philosophy including physics, neuroscience, biology and medicine, ecology, and sociology. While system architecture and their general purpose may depend on domain-specific concepts and definitions, there are (at least) seven key properties of self-organization clearly identified in brain systems: (1) modular connectivity, (2) unsupervised learning, (3) adaptive ability, (4) functional resiliency, (5) functional plasticity, (6) from-local-to-global functional organization, and (7) dynamic system growth. These are defined here in the light of insight from neurobiology, cognitive neuroscience and Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART), and physics to show that self-organization achieves stability and functional plasticity while minimizing structural system complexity. A specific example informed by empirical research is discussed to illustrate how modularity, adaptive learning, and dynamic network growth enable stable yet plastic somatosensory representation for human grip force control. Implications for the design of “strong” artificial intelligence in robotics are brought forward.
Collapse
|
10
|
Perlovsky L, Schoeller F. Unconscious emotions of human learning. Phys Life Rev 2019; 31:257-262. [DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
11
|
Grossberg S. The Embodied Brain of SOVEREIGN2: From Space-Variant Conscious Percepts During Visual Search and Navigation to Learning Invariant Object Categories and Cognitive-Emotional Plans for Acquiring Valued Goals. Front Comput Neurosci 2019; 13:36. [PMID: 31333437 PMCID: PMC6620614 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This article develops a model of how reactive and planned behaviors interact in real time. Controllers for both animals and animats need reactive mechanisms for exploration, and learned plans to efficiently reach goal objects once an environment becomes familiar. The SOVEREIGN model embodied these capabilities, and was tested in a 3D virtual reality environment. Neural models have characterized important adaptive and intelligent processes that were not included in SOVEREIGN. A major research program is summarized herein by which to consistently incorporate them into an enhanced model called SOVEREIGN2. Key new perceptual, cognitive, cognitive-emotional, and navigational processes require feedback networks which regulate resonant brain states that support conscious experiences of seeing, feeling, and knowing. Also included are computationally complementary processes of the mammalian neocortical What and Where processing streams, and homologous mechanisms for spatial navigation and arm movement control. These include: Unpredictably moving targets are tracked using coordinated smooth pursuit and saccadic movements. Estimates of target and present position are computed in the Where stream, and can activate approach movements. Motion cues can elicit orienting movements to bring new targets into view. Cumulative movement estimates are derived from visual and vestibular cues. Arbitrary navigational routes are incrementally learned as a labeled graph of angles turned and distances traveled between turns. Noisy and incomplete visual sensor data are transformed into representations of visual form and motion. Invariant recognition categories are learned in the What stream. Sequences of invariant object categories are stored in a cognitive working memory, whereas sequences of movement positions and directions are stored in a spatial working memory. Stored sequences trigger learning of cognitive and spatial/motor sequence categories or plans, also called list chunks, which control planned decisions and movements toward valued goal objects. Predictively successful list chunk combinations are selectively enhanced or suppressed via reinforcement learning and incentive motivational learning. Expected vs. unexpected event disconfirmations regulate these enhancement and suppressive processes. Adaptively timed learning enables attention and action to match task constraints. Social cognitive joint attention enables imitation learning of skills by learners who observe teachers from different spatial vantage points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Departments of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
England BJ, Brigati JR, Schussler EE, Chen MM. Student Anxiety and Perception of Difficulty Impact Performance and Persistence in Introductory Biology Courses. CBE LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION 2019; 18:ar21. [PMID: 31120397 PMCID: PMC6755222 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Students respond to classroom activities and achievement outcomes with a variety of emotions that can impact student success. One emotion students experience is anxiety, which can negatively impact student performance and persistence. This study investigated what types of classroom anxiety were related to student performance in the course and persistence in the major. Students in introductory biology classes self-reported their general class, test, communication, and social anxiety; perceived course difficulty; intention to stay in the major; and demographic variables. Final course grades were acquired from instructors. An increase in perception of course difficulty from the beginning to the end of the semester was significantly associated with lower final course grades (N = 337), particularly for females, non-Caucasians, and students who took fewer Advanced Placement (AP) courses. An increase in communication anxiety slightly increased performance. Higher general class anxiety at the beginning of the semester was associated with intention to leave the major (N = 122) at the end of the semester, particularly for females. Females, freshmen, and those with fewer AP courses reported higher general class anxiety and perceived course difficulty. Future research should identify which factors differentially impact student anxiety levels and perceived difficulty and explore coping strategies for students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J. England
- Division of Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
- *Address correspondence to: Benjamin J. England ()
| | | | - Elisabeth E. Schussler
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | - Miranda M. Chen
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laeng B, Kiambarua KG, Hagen T, Bochynska A, Lubell J, Suzuki H, Okubo M. The "face race lightness illusion": An effect of the eyes and pupils? PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201603. [PMID: 30071065 PMCID: PMC6072068 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In an internet-based, forced-choice, test of the ‘face race lightness illusion’, the majority of respondents, regardless of their ethnicity, reported perceiving the African face as darker in skin tone than the European face, despite the mean luminance, contrast and numbers of pixels of the images were identical. In the laboratory, using eye tracking, it was found that eye fixations were distributed differently on the African face and European face, so that gaze dwelled relatively longer onto the locally brighter regions of the African face and, in turn, mean pupil diameters were smaller than for the European face. There was no relationship between pupils’ size and implicit social attitude (IAT) scores. In another experiment, the faces were presented either tachistoscopically (140 ms) or longer (2500 ms) so that, when gaze was prevented from looking directly at the faces in the former condition, the tendency to report the African face as “dark” disappeared, but it was present when gaze was free to move for just a few seconds. We conclude that the presence of the illusion depends on oculomotor behavior and we also propose a novel account based on a predictive strategy of sensory acquisition. Specifically, by differentially directing gaze towards to facial regions that are locally different in luminance, the resulting changes in retinal illuminance yield respectively darker or brighter percepts while attending to each face, hence minimizing the mismatch between visual input and the learned perceptual prototypes of ethnic categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Laeng
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- * E-mail:
| | - Kenneth Gitiye Kiambarua
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Kenya Methodist University, Meru, Kenya
| | - Thomas Hagen
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Agata Bochynska
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jamie Lubell
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, United States of America
| | - Hikaru Suzuki
- Department of Psychology, Senshu University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Matia Okubo
- Department of Psychology, Senshu University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Predictability of what or where reduces brain activity, but a bottleneck occurs when both are predictable. Neuroimage 2018; 167:224-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abraham A. The imaginative mind. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 37:4197-4211. [PMID: 27453527 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The astounding capacity for the human imagination to be engaged across a wide range of contexts is limitless and fundamental to our day-to-day experiences. Although processes of imagination are central to human psychological function, they rarely occupy center stage in academic discourse or empirical study within psychological and neuroscientific realms. The aim of this paper is to tackle this imbalance by drawing together the multitudinous facets of imagination within a common framework. The processes fall into one of five categories depending on whether they are characterized as involving perceptual/motor related mental imagery, intentionality or recollective processing, novel combinatorial or generative processing, exceptional phenomenology in the aesthetic response, or altered psychological states which range from commonplace to dysfunctional. These proposed categories are defined on the basis of theoretical ideas from philosophy as well as empirical evidence from neuroscience. By synthesizing the findings across these domains of imagination, this novel five-part or quinquepartite classification of the human imagination aids in systematizing, and thereby abets, our understanding of the workings and neural foundations of the human imagination. It would serve as a blueprint to direct further advances in the field of imagination while also promoting crosstalk with reference to stimulus-oriented facets of information processing. A biologically and ecologically valid psychology is one that seeks to explain fundamental aspects of human nature. Given the ubiquitous nature of the imaginative operations in our daily lives, there can be little doubt that these quintessential aspects of the mind should be central to the discussion. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4197-4211, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Abraham
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bravo F, Cross I, Hawkins S, Gonzalez N, Docampo J, Bruno C, Stamatakis EA. Neural mechanisms underlying valence inferences to sound: The role of the right angular gyrus. Neuropsychologia 2017; 102:144-162. [PMID: 28602997 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
We frequently infer others' intentions based on non-verbal auditory cues. Although the brain underpinnings of social cognition have been extensively studied, no empirical work has yet examined the impact of musical structure manipulation on the neural processing of emotional valence during mental state inferences. We used a novel sound-based theory-of-mind paradigm in which participants categorized stimuli of different sensory dissonance level in terms of positive/negative valence. Whilst consistent with previous studies which propose facilitated encoding of consonances, our results demonstrated that distinct levels of consonance/dissonance elicited differential influences on the right angular gyrus, an area implicated in mental state attribution and attention reorienting processes. Functional and effective connectivity analyses further showed that consonances modulated a specific inhibitory interaction from associative memory to mental state attribution substrates. Following evidence suggesting that individuals with autism may process social affective cues differently, we assessed the relationship between participants' task performance and self-reported autistic traits in clinically typical adults. Higher scores on the social cognition scales of the AQ were associated with deficits in recognising positive valence in consonant sound cues. These findings are discussed with respect to Bayesian perspectives on autistic perception, which highlight a functional failure to optimize precision in relation to prior beliefs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Bravo
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Music and Science, Cambridge, UK; TU Dresden, Institut für Kunst- und Musikwissenschaft (E.A.R.S.), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Ian Cross
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Music and Science, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Hawkins
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Music and Science, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nadia Gonzalez
- Fundación Científica del Sur Imaging Centre, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge Docampo
- Fundación Científica del Sur Imaging Centre, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Claudio Bruno
- Fundación Científica del Sur Imaging Centre, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tabassum H, Ashafaq M, Parvez S, Raisuddin S. Role of melatonin in mitigating nonylphenol-induced toxicity in frontal cortex and hippocampus of rat brain. Neurochem Int 2016; 104:11-26. [PMID: 28012845 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Revised: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Nonylphenol (NP), an environmental endocrine disruptor mimics estrogen and is a potential toxicant both under in vitro and in vivo conditions. In this study, the effect of melatonin on NP- induced neurotoxicity and cognitive alteration was investigated in adult male Wistar rats. Melatonin supplementation has been known to protect cells from neurotoxic injury. The animals were divided into three groups namely, control (vehicle) which received olive oil orally and treated rats received NP (25 mg/kg, per os) thrice a week for 45 days while the third group i.e., NP + melatonin, animals were co-administered melatonin (10 mg/kg, i.p.) along with NP. On the 46th day, rats were assessed for anxiety, motor co-ordination, grip strength and cognitive performance using Morris water maze test and then sacrificed for biochemical and histopathological assays in brain tissues. Melatonin improved the behavioral performance in NP exposed group. The results showed that NP significantly decreased the activity of acetylcholine esterase (AchE), monoamine oxidase (MAO) and Na+/K+-ATPase, in rat brain tissue along with other enzymes of antioxidant milieu. The outcome of the study shows that NP, like other persistent endocrine disrupting pollutants, creates a potential risk of cognitive, neurochemical and histopathological perturbations as a result of environmental exposure. Taken together, our study demonstrates that melatonin is protective against NP-induced neurotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heena Tabassum
- Department of Medical Elementology and Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi 110 062, India
| | - Mohammad Ashafaq
- Department of Medical Elementology and Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi 110 062, India
| | - Suhel Parvez
- Department of Medical Elementology and Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi 110 062, India
| | - Sheikh Raisuddin
- Department of Medical Elementology and Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi 110 062, India.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grossberg S. Towards solving the hard problem of consciousness: The varieties of brain resonances and the conscious experiences that they support. Neural Netw 2016; 87:38-95. [PMID: 28088645 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2016.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The hard problem of consciousness is the problem of explaining how we experience qualia or phenomenal experiences, such as seeing, hearing, and feeling, and knowing what they are. To solve this problem, a theory of consciousness needs to link brain to mind by modeling how emergent properties of several brain mechanisms interacting together embody detailed properties of individual conscious psychological experiences. This article summarizes evidence that Adaptive Resonance Theory, or ART, accomplishes this goal. ART is a cognitive and neural theory of how advanced brains autonomously learn to attend, recognize, and predict objects and events in a changing world. ART has predicted that "all conscious states are resonant states" as part of its specification of mechanistic links between processes of consciousness, learning, expectation, attention, resonance, and synchrony. It hereby provides functional and mechanistic explanations of data ranging from individual spikes and their synchronization to the dynamics of conscious perceptual, cognitive, and cognitive-emotional experiences. ART has reached sufficient maturity to begin classifying the brain resonances that support conscious experiences of seeing, hearing, feeling, and knowing. Psychological and neurobiological data in both normal individuals and clinical patients are clarified by this classification. This analysis also explains why not all resonances become conscious, and why not all brain dynamics are resonant. The global organization of the brain into computationally complementary cortical processing streams (complementary computing), and the organization of the cerebral cortex into characteristic layers of cells (laminar computing), figure prominently in these explanations of conscious and unconscious processes. Alternative models of consciousness are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Departments of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dresp-Langley B, Grossberg S. Neural Computation of Surface Border Ownership and Relative Surface Depth from Ambiguous Contrast Inputs. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1102. [PMID: 27516746 PMCID: PMC4963386 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The segregation of image parts into foreground and background is an important aspect of the neural computation of 3D scene perception. To achieve such segregation, the brain needs information about border ownership; that is, the belongingness of a contour to a specific surface represented in the image. This article presents psychophysical data derived from 3D percepts of figure and ground that were generated by presenting 2D images composed of spatially disjoint shapes that pointed inward or outward relative to the continuous boundaries that they induced along their collinear edges. The shapes in some images had the same contrast (black or white) with respect to the background gray. Other images included opposite contrasts along each induced continuous boundary. Psychophysical results demonstrate conditions under which figure-ground judgment probabilities in response to these ambiguous displays are determined by the orientation of contrasts only, not by their relative contrasts, despite the fact that many border ownership cells in cortical area V2 respond to a preferred relative contrast. Studies are also reviewed in which both polarity-specific and polarity-invariant properties obtain. The FACADE and 3D LAMINART models are used to explain these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitta Dresp-Langley
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ICube UMR 7357, University of Strasbourg Strasbourg, France
| | - Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Department of Mathematics, Boston University, Boston MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Correll J, Hudson SM, Guillermo S, Earls HA. Of Kith and Kin: Perceptual Enrichment, Expectancy, and Reciprocity in Face Perception. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW 2016; 21:336-360. [PMID: 27407118 DOI: 10.1177/1088868316657250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Race powerfully affects perceivers' responses to faces, promoting biases in attention, classification, and memory. To account for these diverse effects, we propose a model that integrates social cognitive work with two prominent accounts of visual processing: perceptual learning and predictive coding. Our argument is that differential experience with a racial ingroup promotes both (a) perceptual enrichment, including richer, more well-integrated visual representations of ingroup relative to outgroup faces, and (b) expectancies that ingroup faces are normative, which influence subsequent visual processing. By allowing for "top-down" expectancy-based processes, this model accounts for both experience- and non-experience-based influences, such as motivation, context, and task instructions. Fundamentally, we suggest that we treat race as an important psychological dimension because it structures our social environment, which in turn structures mental representation.
Collapse
|
21
|
Marstaller L, Burianová H, Reutens DC. Dynamic competition between large-scale functional networks differentiates fear conditioning and extinction in humans. Neuroimage 2016; 134:314-319. [PMID: 27079532 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The high evolutionary value of learning when to respond to threats or when to inhibit previously learned associations after changing threat contingencies is reflected in dedicated networks in the animal and human brain. Recent evidence further suggests that adaptive learning may be dependent on the dynamic interaction of meta-stable functional brain networks. However, it is still unclear which functional brain networks compete with each other to facilitate associative learning and how changes in threat contingencies affect this competition. The aim of this study was to assess the dynamic competition between large-scale networks related to associative learning in the human brain by combining a repeated differential conditioning and extinction paradigm with independent component analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. The results (i) identify three task-related networks involved in initial and sustained conditioning as well as extinction, and demonstrate that (ii) the two main networks that underlie sustained conditioning and extinction are anti-correlated with each other and (iii) the dynamic competition between these two networks is modulated in response to changes in associative contingencies. These findings provide novel evidence for the view that dynamic competition between large-scale functional networks differentiates fear conditioning from extinction learning in the healthy brain and suggest that dysfunctional network dynamics might contribute to learning-related neuropsychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Marstaller
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; ARC Science of Learning Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Hana Burianová
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - David C Reutens
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; ARC Science of Learning Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Grossberg S. Cortical Dynamics of Figure-Ground Separation in Response to 2D Pictures and 3D Scenes: How V2 Combines Border Ownership, Stereoscopic Cues, and Gestalt Grouping Rules. Front Psychol 2016; 6:2054. [PMID: 26858665 PMCID: PMC4726768 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The FACADE model, and its laminar cortical realization and extension in the 3D LAMINART model, have explained, simulated, and predicted many perceptual and neurobiological data about how the visual cortex carries out 3D vision and figure-ground perception, and how these cortical mechanisms enable 2D pictures to generate 3D percepts of occluding and occluded objects. In particular, these models have proposed how border ownership occurs, but have not yet explicitly explained the correlation between multiple properties of border ownership neurons in cortical area V2 that were reported in a remarkable series of neurophysiological experiments by von der Heydt and his colleagues; namely, border ownership, contrast preference, binocular stereoscopic information, selectivity for side-of-figure, Gestalt rules, and strength of attentional modulation, as well as the time course during which such properties arise. This article shows how, by combining 3D LAMINART properties that were discovered in two parallel streams of research, a unified explanation of these properties emerges. This explanation proposes, moreover, how these properties contribute to the generation of consciously seen 3D surfaces. The first research stream models how processes like 3D boundary grouping and surface filling-in interact in multiple stages within and between the V1 interblob—V2 interstripe—V4 cortical stream and the V1 blob—V2 thin stripe—V4 cortical stream, respectively. Of particular importance for understanding figure-ground separation is how these cortical interactions convert computationally complementary boundary and surface mechanisms into a consistent conscious percept, including the critical use of surface contour feedback signals from surface representations in V2 thin stripes to boundary representations in V2 interstripes. Remarkably, key figure-ground properties emerge from these feedback interactions. The second research stream shows how cells that compute absolute disparity in cortical area V1 are transformed into cells that compute relative disparity in cortical area V2. Relative disparity is a more invariant measure of an object's depth and 3D shape, and is sensitive to figure-ground properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston UniversityBoston, MA, USA; Department of Mathematics, Boston UniversityBoston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Neural Dynamics of the Basal Ganglia During Perceptual, Cognitive, and Motor Learning and Gating. INNOVATIONS IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42743-0_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
24
|
Mathews Z, Cetnarski R, Verschure PFMJ. Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing. Front Psychol 2015; 5:1443. [PMID: 25741290 PMCID: PMC4330879 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction plays a key role in control of attention but it is not clear which aspects of prediction are most prominent in conscious experience. An evolving view on the brain is that it can be seen as a prediction machine that optimizes its ability to predict states of the world and the self through the top-down propagation of predictions and the bottom-up presentation of prediction errors. There are competing views though on whether prediction or prediction errors dominate the formation of conscious experience. Yet, the dynamic effects of prediction on perception, decision making and consciousness have been difficult to assess and to model. We propose a novel mathematical framework and a psychophysical paradigm that allows us to assess both the hierarchical structuring of perceptual consciousness, its content and the impact of predictions and/or errors on conscious experience, attention and decision-making. Using a displacement detection task combined with reverse correlation, we reveal signatures of the usage of prediction at three different levels of perceptual processing: bottom-up fast saccades, top-down driven slow saccades and consciousnes decisions. Our results suggest that the brain employs multiple parallel mechanism at different levels of perceptual processing in order to shape effective sensory consciousness within a predicted perceptual scene. We further observe that bottom-up sensory and top-down predictive processes can be dissociated through cognitive load. We propose a probabilistic data association model from dynamical systems theory to model the predictive multi-scale bias in perceptual processing that we observe and its role in the formation of conscious experience. We propose that these results support the hypothesis that consciousness provides a time-delayed description of a task that is used to prospectively optimize real time control structures, rather than being engaged in the real-time control of behavior itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenon Mathews
- Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems Group, Department of Technology, Information and Communication, Center of Autonomous Systems and Neurorobotics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ryszard Cetnarski
- Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems Group, Department of Technology, Information and Communication, Center of Autonomous Systems and Neurorobotics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul F M J Verschure
- Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems Group, Department of Technology, Information and Communication, Center of Autonomous Systems and Neurorobotics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain ; Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Passeig Llus Companys Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grossberg S, Srinivasan K, Yazdanbakhsh A. Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements. Front Psychol 2015; 5:1457. [PMID: 25642198 PMCID: PMC4294135 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
How does the brain maintain stable fusion of 3D scenes when the eyes move? Every eye movement causes each retinal position to process a different set of scenic features, and thus the brain needs to binocularly fuse new combinations of features at each position after an eye movement. Despite these breaks in retinotopic fusion due to each movement, previously fused representations of a scene in depth often appear stable. The 3D ARTSCAN neural model proposes how the brain does this by unifying concepts about how multiple cortical areas in the What and Where cortical streams interact to coordinate processes of 3D boundary and surface perception, spatial attention, invariant object category learning, predictive remapping, eye movement control, and learned coordinate transformations. The model explains data from single neuron and psychophysical studies of covert visual attention shifts prior to eye movements. The model further clarifies how perceptual, attentional, and cognitive interactions among multiple brain regions (LGN, V1, V2, V3A, V4, MT, MST, PPC, LIP, ITp, ITa, SC) may accomplish predictive remapping as part of the process whereby view-invariant object categories are learned. These results build upon earlier neural models of 3D vision and figure-ground separation and the learning of invariant object categories as the eyes freely scan a scene. A key process concerns how an object's surface representation generates a form-fitting distribution of spatial attention, or attentional shroud, in parietal cortex that helps maintain the stability of multiple perceptual and cognitive processes. Predictive eye movement signals maintain the stability of the shroud, as well as of binocularly fused perceptual boundaries and surface representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, and Department of Mathematics Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karthik Srinivasan
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, and Department of Mathematics Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arash Yazdanbakhsh
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, and Department of Mathematics Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
From brain synapses to systems for learning and memory: Object recognition, spatial navigation, timed conditioning, and movement control. Brain Res 2014; 1621:270-93. [PMID: 25446436 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an overview of neural models of synaptic learning and memory whose expression in adaptive behavior depends critically on the circuits and systems in which the synapses are embedded. It reviews Adaptive Resonance Theory, or ART, models that use excitatory matching and match-based learning to achieve fast category learning and whose learned memories are dynamically stabilized by top-down expectations, attentional focusing, and memory search. ART clarifies mechanistic relationships between consciousness, learning, expectation, attention, resonance, and synchrony. ART models are embedded in ARTSCAN architectures that unify processes of invariant object category learning, recognition, spatial and object attention, predictive remapping, and eye movement search, and that clarify how conscious object vision and recognition may fail during perceptual crowding and parietal neglect. The generality of learned categories depends upon a vigilance process that is regulated by acetylcholine via the nucleus basalis. Vigilance can get stuck at too high or too low values, thereby causing learning problems in autism and medial temporal amnesia. Similar synaptic learning laws support qualitatively different behaviors: Invariant object category learning in the inferotemporal cortex; learning of grid cells and place cells in the entorhinal and hippocampal cortices during spatial navigation; and learning of time cells in the entorhinal-hippocampal system during adaptively timed conditioning, including trace conditioning. Spatial and temporal processes through the medial and lateral entorhinal-hippocampal system seem to be carried out with homologous circuit designs. Variations of a shared laminar neocortical circuit design have modeled 3D vision, speech perception, and cognitive working memory and learning. A complementary kind of inhibitory matching and mismatch learning controls movement. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Brain and Memory.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cao Y, Grossberg S. How the venetian blind percept emerges from the laminar cortical dynamics of 3D vision. Front Psychol 2014; 5:694. [PMID: 25309467 PMCID: PMC4160971 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 06/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The 3D LAMINART model of 3D vision and figure-ground perception is used to explain and simulate a key example of the Venetian blind effect and to show how it is related to other well-known perceptual phenomena such as Panum's limiting case. The model proposes how lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and hierarchically organized laminar circuits in cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 interact to control processes of 3D boundary formation and surface filling-in that simulate many properties of 3D vision percepts, notably consciously seen surface percepts, which are predicted to arise when filled-in surface representations are integrated into surface-shroud resonances between visual and parietal cortex. Interactions between layers 4, 3B, and 2/3 in V1 and V2 carry out stereopsis and 3D boundary formation. Both binocular and monocular information combine to form 3D boundary and surface representations. Surface contour surface-to-boundary feedback from V2 thin stripes to V2 pale stripes combines computationally complementary boundary and surface formation properties, leading to a single consistent percept, while also eliminating redundant 3D boundaries, and triggering figure-ground perception. False binocular boundary matches are eliminated by Gestalt grouping properties during boundary formation. In particular, a disparity filter, which helps to solve the Correspondence Problem by eliminating false matches, is predicted to be realized as part of the boundary grouping process in layer 2/3 of cortical area V2. The model has been used to simulate the consciously seen 3D surface percepts in 18 psychophysical experiments. These percepts include the Venetian blind effect, Panum's limiting case, contrast variations of dichoptic masking and the correspondence problem, the effect of interocular contrast differences on stereoacuity, stereopsis with polarity-reversed stereograms, da Vinci stereopsis, and perceptual closure. These model mechanisms have also simulated properties of 3D neon color spreading, binocular rivalry, 3D Necker cube, and many examples of 3D figure-ground separation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Grossberg
- Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Department of Mathematics, Center for Adaptive Systems, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chang HC, Grossberg S, Cao Y. Where's Waldo? How perceptual, cognitive, and emotional brain processes cooperate during learning to categorize and find desired objects in a cluttered scene. Front Integr Neurosci 2014; 8:43. [PMID: 24987339 PMCID: PMC4060746 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2013] [Accepted: 05/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Where's Waldo problem concerns how individuals can rapidly learn to search a scene to detect, attend, recognize, and look at a valued target object in it. This article develops the ARTSCAN Search neural model to clarify how brain mechanisms across the What and Where cortical streams are coordinated to solve the Where's Waldo problem. The What stream learns positionally-invariant object representations, whereas the Where stream controls positionally-selective spatial and action representations. The model overcomes deficiencies of these computationally complementary properties through What and Where stream interactions. Where stream processes of spatial attention and predictive eye movement control modulate What stream processes whereby multiple view- and positionally-specific object categories are learned and associatively linked to view- and positionally-invariant object categories through bottom-up and attentive top-down interactions. Gain fields control the coordinate transformations that enable spatial attention and predictive eye movements to carry out this role. What stream cognitive-emotional learning processes enable the focusing of motivated attention upon the invariant object categories of desired objects. What stream cognitive names or motivational drives can prime a view- and positionally-invariant object category of a desired target object. A volitional signal can convert these primes into top-down activations that can, in turn, prime What stream view- and positionally-specific categories. When it also receives bottom-up activation from a target, such a positionally-specific category can cause an attentional shift in the Where stream to the positional representation of the target, and an eye movement can then be elicited to foveate it. These processes describe interactions among brain regions that include visual cortex, parietal cortex, inferotemporal cortex, prefrontal cortex (PFC), amygdala, basal ganglia (BG), and superior colliculus (SC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hung-Cheng Chang
- Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Department of Mathematics, Center for Adaptive Systems, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Grossberg
- Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Department of Mathematics, Center for Adaptive Systems, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yongqiang Cao
- Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Department of Mathematics, Center for Adaptive Systems, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
ZHANG YUANCHAO, WEI GAOXIA, ZHUO JUNJIE, LI YOUFA, YE WEI, JIANG TIANZI. Regional Inflation of the Thalamus and Globus Pallidus in Diving Players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45:1077-82. [DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31827f4370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
30
|
Rauss K, Pourtois G. What is Bottom-Up and What is Top-Down in Predictive Coding? Front Psychol 2013; 4:276. [PMID: 23730295 PMCID: PMC3656342 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 04/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Everyone knows what bottom-up is, and how it is different from top-down. At least one is tempted to think so, given that both terms are ubiquitously used, but only rarely defined in the psychology and neuroscience literature. In this review, we highlight the problems and limitations of our current understanding of bottom-up and top-down processes, and we propose a reformulation of this distinction in terms of predictive coding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karsten Rauss
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Adaptive Resonance Theory: How a brain learns to consciously attend, learn, and recognize a changing world. Neural Netw 2013; 37:1-47. [PMID: 23149242 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2012] [Revised: 08/24/2012] [Accepted: 09/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
32
|
Srinivasa N, Bhattacharyya R, Sundareswara R, Lee C, Grossberg S. A bio-inspired kinematic controller for obstacle avoidance during reaching tasks with real robots. Neural Netw 2012; 35:54-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2010] [Revised: 06/19/2012] [Accepted: 07/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
33
|
Schettino A, Loeys T, Bossi M, Pourtois G. Valence-specific modulation in the accumulation of perceptual evidence prior to visual scene recognition. PLoS One 2012; 7:e38064. [PMID: 22675437 PMCID: PMC3364984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2012] [Accepted: 04/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual scene recognition is a dynamic process through which incoming sensory information is iteratively compared with predictions regarding the most likely identity of the input stimulus. In this study, we used a novel progressive unfolding task to characterize the accumulation of perceptual evidence prior to scene recognition, and its potential modulation by the emotional valence of these scenes. Our results show that emotional (pleasant and unpleasant) scenes led to slower accumulation of evidence compared to neutral scenes. In addition, when controlling for the potential contribution of non-emotional factors (i.e., familiarity and complexity of the pictures), our results confirm a reliable shift in the accumulation of evidence for pleasant relative to neutral and unpleasant scenes, suggesting a valence-specific effect. These findings indicate that proactive iterations between sensory processing and top-down predictions during scene recognition are reliably influenced by the rapidly extracted (positive) emotional valence of the visual stimuli. We interpret these findings in accordance with the notion of a genuine positivity offset during emotional scene recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Schettino
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Loeys
- Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Manuela Bossi
- Department of Psychology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gilles Pourtois
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Abstract
Spoken sentence comprehension relies on rapid and effortless temporal integration of speech units displayed at different rates. Temporal integration refers to how chunks of information perceived at different time scales are linked together by the listener in mapping speech sounds onto meaning. The neural implementation of this integration remains unclear. This study explores the role of short and long windows of integration in accessing meaning from long samples of speech. In a cross-linguistic study, we explore the time course of oscillatory brain activity between 1 and 100 Hz, recorded using EEG, during the processing of native and foreign languages. We compare oscillatory responses in a group of Italian and Spanish native speakers while they attentively listen to Italian, Japanese, and Spanish utterances, played either forward or backward. The results show that both groups of participants display a significant increase in gamma band power (55–75 Hz) only when they listen to their native language played forward. The increase in gamma power starts around 1000 msec after the onset of the utterance and decreases by its end, resembling the time course of access to meaning during speech perception. In contrast, changes in low-frequency power show similar patterns for both native and foreign languages. We propose that gamma band power reflects a temporal binding phenomenon concerning the coordination of neural assemblies involved in accessing meaning of long samples of speech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Peña
- 1Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste, Italy
- 2Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
| | - Lucia Melloni
- 2Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
- 3Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Foley NC, Grossberg S, Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of object-based multifocal visual spatial attention and priming: object cueing, useful-field-of-view, and crowding. Cogn Psychol 2012; 65:77-117. [PMID: 22425615 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2011] [Revised: 01/07/2012] [Accepted: 02/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
How are spatial and object attention coordinated to achieve rapid object learning and recognition during eye movement search? How do prefrontal priming and parietal spatial mechanisms interact to determine the reaction time costs of intra-object attention shifts, inter-object attention shifts, and shifts between visible objects and covertly cued locations? What factors underlie individual differences in the timing and frequency of such attentional shifts? How do transient and sustained spatial attentional mechanisms work and interact? How can volition, mediated via the basal ganglia, influence the span of spatial attention? A neural model is developed of how spatial attention in the where cortical stream coordinates view-invariant object category learning in the what cortical stream under free viewing conditions. The model simulates psychological data about the dynamics of covert attention priming and switching requiring multifocal attention without eye movements. The model predicts how "attentional shrouds" are formed when surface representations in cortical area V4 resonate with spatial attention in posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC), while shrouds compete among themselves for dominance. Winning shrouds support invariant object category learning, and active surface-shroud resonances support conscious surface perception and recognition. Attentive competition between multiple objects and cues simulates reaction-time data from the two-object cueing paradigm. The relative strength of sustained surface-driven and fast-transient motion-driven spatial attention controls individual differences in reaction time for invalid cues. Competition between surface-driven attentional shrouds controls individual differences in detection rate of peripheral targets in useful-field-of-view tasks. The model proposes how the strength of competition can be mediated, though learning or momentary changes in volition, by the basal ganglia. A new explanation of crowding shows how the cortical magnification factor, among other variables, can cause multiple object surfaces to share a single surface-shroud resonance, thereby preventing recognition of the individual objects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Foley
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cao Y, Grossberg S. Stereopsis and 3D surface perception by spiking neurons in laminar cortical circuits: a method for converting neural rate models into spiking models. Neural Netw 2011; 26:75-98. [PMID: 22119530 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2011.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2010] [Revised: 10/16/2011] [Accepted: 10/20/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and 3D surface perception is developed and simulated. The model shows how spiking neurons that interact in hierarchically organized laminar circuits of the visual cortex can generate analog properties of 3D visual percepts. The model describes how monocular and binocular oriented filtering interact with later stages of 3D boundary formation and surface filling-in in the LGN and cortical areas V1, V2, and V4. It proposes how interactions between layers 4, 3B, and 2/3 in V1 and V2 contribute to stereopsis, and how binocular and monocular information combine to form 3D boundary and surface representations. The model suggests how surface-to-boundary feedback from V2 thin stripes to pale stripes helps to explain how computationally complementary boundary and surface formation properties lead to a single consistent percept, eliminate redundant 3D boundaries, and trigger figure-ground perception. The model also shows how false binocular boundary matches may be eliminated by Gestalt grouping properties. In particular, the disparity filter, which helps to solve the correspondence problem by eliminating false matches, is realized using inhibitory interneurons as part of the perceptual grouping process by horizontal connections in layer 2/3 of cortical area V2. The 3D sLAMINART model simulates 3D surface percepts that are consciously seen in 18 psychophysical experiments. These percepts include contrast variations of dichoptic masking and the correspondence problem, the effect of interocular contrast differences on stereoacuity, Panum's limiting case, the Venetian blind illusion, stereopsis with polarity-reversed stereograms, da Vinci stereopsis, and perceptual closure. The model hereby illustrates a general method of unlumping rate-based models that use the membrane equations of neurophysiology into models that use spiking neurons, and which may be embodied in VLSI chips that use spiking neurons to minimize heat production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongqiang Cao
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Anterior Prefrontal Cortex Inhibition Impairs Control over Social Emotional Actions. Curr Biol 2011; 21:1766-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2011] [Revised: 08/22/2011] [Accepted: 08/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
38
|
Cao Y, Grossberg S, Markowitz J. How does the brain rapidly learn and reorganize view-invariant and position-invariant object representations in the inferotemporal cortex? Neural Netw 2011; 24:1050-61. [PMID: 21596523 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2011.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2010] [Revised: 04/10/2011] [Accepted: 04/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
All primates depend for their survival on being able to rapidly learn about and recognize objects. Objects may be visually detected at multiple positions, sizes, and viewpoints. How does the brain rapidly learn and recognize objects while scanning a scene with eye movements, without causing a combinatorial explosion in the number of cells that are needed? How does the brain avoid the problem of erroneously classifying parts of different objects together at the same or different positions in a visual scene? In monkeys and humans, a key area for such invariant object category learning and recognition is the inferotemporal cortex (IT). A neural model is proposed to explain how spatial and object attention coordinate the ability of IT to learn invariant category representations of objects that are seen at multiple positions, sizes, and viewpoints. The model clarifies how interactions within a hierarchy of processing stages in the visual brain accomplish this. These stages include the retina, lateral geniculate nucleus, and cortical areas V1, V2, V4, and IT in the brain's What cortical stream, as they interact with spatial attention processes within the parietal cortex of the Where cortical stream. The model builds upon the ARTSCAN model, which proposed how view-invariant object representations are generated. The positional ARTSCAN (pARTSCAN) model proposes how the following additional processes in the What cortical processing stream also enable position-invariant object representations to be learned: IT cells with persistent activity, and a combination of normalizing object category competition and a view-to-object learning law which together ensure that unambiguous views have a larger effect on object recognition than ambiguous views. The model explains how such invariant learning can be fooled when monkeys, or other primates, are presented with an object that is swapped with another object during eye movements to foveate the original object. The swapping procedure is predicted to prevent the reset of spatial attention, which would otherwise keep the representations of multiple objects from being combined by learning. Li and DiCarlo (2008) have presented neurophysiological data from monkeys showing how unsupervised natural experience in a target swapping experiment can rapidly alter object representations in IT. The model quantitatively simulates the swapping data by showing how the swapping procedure fools the spatial attention mechanism. More generally, the model provides a unifying framework, and testable predictions in both monkeys and humans, for understanding object learning data using neurophysiological methods in monkeys, and spatial attention, episodic learning, and memory retrieval data using functional imaging methods in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongqiang Cao
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Obleser J, Kotz SA. Multiple brain signatures of integration in the comprehension of degraded speech. Neuroimage 2011; 55:713-23. [PMID: 21172443 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2010] [Revised: 11/26/2010] [Accepted: 12/06/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Obleser
- Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schettino A, Loeys T, Delplanque S, Pourtois G. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study. Neuroimage 2011; 55:1227-41. [PMID: 21237274 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2010] [Revised: 12/22/2010] [Accepted: 01/05/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that visual object recognition is a proactive process through which perceptual evidence accumulates over time before a decision can be made about the object. However, the exact electrophysiological correlates and time-course of this complex process remain unclear. In addition, the potential influence of emotion on this process has not been investigated yet. We recorded high density EEG in healthy adult participants performing a novel perceptual recognition task. For each trial, an initial blurred visual scene was first shown, before the actual content of the stimulus was gradually revealed by progressively adding diagnostic high spatial frequency information. Participants were asked to stop this stimulus sequence as soon as they could correctly perform an animacy judgment task. Behavioral results showed that participants reliably gathered perceptual evidence before recognition. Furthermore, prolonged exploration times were observed for pleasant, relative to either neutral or unpleasant scenes. ERP results showed distinct effects starting at 280 ms post-stimulus onset in distant brain regions during stimulus processing, mainly characterized by: (i) a monotonic accumulation of evidence, involving regions of the posterior cingulate cortex/parahippocampal gyrus, and (ii) true categorical recognition effects in medial frontal regions, including the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. These findings provide evidence for the early involvement, following stimulus onset, of non-overlapping brain networks during proactive processes eventually leading to visual object recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Schettino
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Corlett PR, Taylor JR, Wang XJ, Fletcher PC, Krystal JH. Toward a neurobiology of delusions. Prog Neurobiol 2010; 92:345-69. [PMID: 20558235 PMCID: PMC3676875 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 251] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2010] [Revised: 05/06/2010] [Accepted: 06/08/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Delusions are the false and often incorrigible beliefs that can cause severe suffering in mental illness. We cannot yet explain them in terms of underlying neurobiological abnormalities. However, by drawing on recent advances in the biological, computational and psychological processes of reinforcement learning, memory, and perception it may be feasible to account for delusions in terms of cognition and brain function. The account focuses on a particular parameter, prediction error--the mismatch between expectation and experience--that provides a computational mechanism common to cortical hierarchies, fronto-striatal circuits and the amygdala as well as parietal cortices. We suggest that delusions result from aberrations in how brain circuits specify hierarchical predictions, and how they compute and respond to prediction errors. Defects in these fundamental brain mechanisms can vitiate perception, memory, bodily agency and social learning such that individuals with delusions experience an internal and external world that healthy individuals would find difficult to comprehend. The present model attempts to provide a framework through which we can build a mechanistic and translational understanding of these puzzling symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P R Corlett
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health Centre, Abraham Ribicoff Research Facility, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roepstorff A, Niewöhner J, Beck S. Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Netw 2010; 23:1051-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2010] [Accepted: 08/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
43
|
Grossberg S, Vladusich T. How do children learn to follow gaze, share joint attention, imitate their teachers, and use tools during social interactions? Neural Netw 2010; 23:940-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2010] [Accepted: 07/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study we tested whether the predictability of stimuli affects responses in primary visual cortex (V1). The results of this study indicate that visual stimuli evoke smaller responses in V1 when their onset or motion direction can be predicted from the dynamics of surrounding illusory motion. We conclude from this finding that the human brain anticipates forthcoming sensory input that allows predictable visual stimuli to be processed with less neural activation at early stages of cortical processing.
Collapse
|